CN114038258A - Learning ability analysis method - Google Patents
Learning ability analysis method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114038258A CN114038258A CN202111417710.0A CN202111417710A CN114038258A CN 114038258 A CN114038258 A CN 114038258A CN 202111417710 A CN202111417710 A CN 202111417710A CN 114038258 A CN114038258 A CN 114038258A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- target
- subject
- ability
- student
- learning
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007786 learning performance Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002194 synthesizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The method comprises the steps of determining at least one target subject to be answered by a target student; obtaining answers which are respectively made by target students to each target subject; respectively judging whether the answer corresponding to each target question is a correct answer or not to obtain the answer result of each target question; respectively acquiring target subject ability and target ability evaluation parameter information thereof corresponding to each target subject based on the answer result of each target subject; the learning ability index of the target student is obtained based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof, so that real-time subject ability feedback analysis is timely obtained through accompanying exercise of the student, personalized learning is carried out according to the subject ability analysis, the exercise effect of the student is improved, burden reduction and efficiency improvement are provided for teachers, and the real-time subject ability analysis feedback is favorably obtained for subject managers.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to a learning ability analysis method.
Background
The education department sets out a core literacy system for the development of students in each school period, and the core literacy system needs accurate judgment of the learning conditions of the students by teachers, so that the learning conditions of the students can be diagnosed and fed back in time. Under the existing environment, the number of students for exercise is large, information fragmentation is realized, students' scores need to be manually input and counted by teachers, and the learning condition of the students is analyzed according to self teaching experiences. The manual statistical analysis is complex in operation, a great deal of energy of teachers can be consumed in file management statistics, and greater workload can be brought to the teachers by inputting computers for statistical analysis, so that in an actual application scene, only periodical statistical analysis can be performed on important examination results, and disciplinary capability analysis of student accompanying exercise is not realized. And (3) stage analysis, wherein the analysis result is delayed, and real-time feedback data cannot be obtained, so that the learning ability of students cannot be known timely and comprehensively, and effective teaching intervention guidance is performed.
Disclosure of Invention
An object of the application is to provide a learning ability analysis method, which realizes that students can timely obtain self-disciplinary ability feedback analysis after completing exercise, and perform personalized learning, and simultaneously, the method can reduce burden and improve efficiency for teachers and timely know the disciplinary ability of each student.
According to an aspect of the present application, there is provided a learning ability analysis method, wherein the method includes:
determining at least one target topic to be answered by the target student;
obtaining answers which are respectively made by the target students to each target question;
respectively judging whether the answer corresponding to each target question is a correct answer or not to obtain the answer result of each target question;
respectively acquiring target subject ability and target ability evaluation parameter information thereof corresponding to each target subject based on each target subject answer result;
and obtaining the learning ability index of the target student based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof.
Further, in the above method, the obtaining answers respectively made by the target students to each target topic includes:
and responding to the input operation of the target students, and acquiring answers made by the target students to each target topic.
Further, in the above method, the input operation includes one or more of a text input operation, a voice input operation, an input operation of triggering a preset key, and an action input operation.
Further, in the above method, the target student includes at least one bit, wherein the method further includes:
and obtaining the comprehensive learning capacity corresponding to the at least one target student according to the learning capacity index of each target student of the at least one target student.
Further, in the above method, the method further includes:
and creating an item bank corresponding to at least one discipline ability, wherein the item bank corresponding to each discipline ability comprises at least one item and corresponding ability evaluation parameter information thereof.
Further, in the above method, the determining at least one target topic to be answered by the target student comprises:
and screening out at least one target topic to be replied by the target student from the topic library corresponding to the at least one subject ability.
Compared with the prior art, the method and the system have the advantages that at least one target topic to be answered by the target student is determined; obtaining answers which are respectively made by the target students to each target question; respectively judging whether the answer corresponding to each target question is a correct answer or not to obtain the answer result of each target question; respectively acquiring target subject ability and target ability evaluation parameter information thereof corresponding to each target subject based on each target subject answer result; the learning ability index of the target student is obtained based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof, so that real-time subject ability feedback analysis is timely obtained through accompanying exercise of the student, personalized learning is carried out according to the subject ability analysis, the exercise effect of the student is improved, meanwhile, the burden reduction and the efficiency increase are realized for teachers, the fact that subject managers obtain real-time subject ability analysis feedback is facilitated, and targeted teaching and teaching activities are timely carried out.
Drawings
Other features, objects and advantages of the present application will become more apparent upon reading of the following detailed description of non-limiting embodiments thereof, made with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 shows a flow diagram of a learning ability analysis method according to the present application;
fig. 2 shows a schematic flow diagram of a learning ability analysis method according to an aspect of the present application in a practical application scenario.
The same or similar reference numbers in the drawings identify the same or similar elements.
Detailed Description
The present application is described in further detail below with reference to the attached figures.
As shown in fig. 1, one aspect of the present application provides a flow diagram of a learning ability analysis method, which may be implemented in a computer language such as Net core, where the method includes step S11, step S12, step S13, step S14, and step S15, and specifically includes the following steps:
at step S11, at least one target topic to be answered by the target student is determined.
And step S12, obtaining answers made by the target students to each target topic respectively.
And step S13, respectively judging whether the answer corresponding to each target question is a correct answer, and obtaining the answer result of each target question.
For example, if the target student is student a, in an actual application scenario, student a exercises target subjects 01 and 02, where a correct answer of target subject 01 is 37.8, a correct answer of target subject 02 is 9, student a enters answer 36.8 at a position corresponding to target subject 01 after the exercise, enters answer 9 at a position corresponding to target subject 02, and after obtaining the answer input by student a, judges an answer result of each target subject, so that the answer result of student a to target subject 01 is wrong, and the answer result to target subject 02 is correct.
And step S14, respectively acquiring target subject ability and target ability evaluation parameter information thereof corresponding to each target topic based on each target topic answer result.
It should be noted that, if the answer result of the target question is correct, the acquired target subject capability of the target question is recorded to reach the standard, and meanwhile, the target capability evaluation parameter information of the target question is recorded; if the answer result of the target question is wrong, the obtained target subject ability of the target question is recorded as not-up-to-standard, and meanwhile, target ability evaluation parameter information of the target question is recorded, so that the answer result is analyzed in time, the target subject ability recorded in a personalized manner and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof are obtained, and result feedback is more accurate.
Here, the target ability evaluation parameter information includes, but is not limited to, a target parameter corresponding to subject ability and a parameter value corresponding thereto, a learning level parameter and a parameter value corresponding thereto, a difficulty level parameter and a parameter value corresponding thereto, a content field parameter and a parameter value corresponding thereto, and the like, when an answer result of a target topic is correct, the target subject ability is up to standard, and each parameter value of the target ability evaluation parameter information of the target topic is up to standard, and when an answer result of the target topic is wrong, the target subject ability is not up to standard, and each parameter value of the target ability evaluation parameter information of the target topic is not up to standard, so that directional value determination of the target ability evaluation parameter information corresponding to the target topic is achieved under the condition of different answer results.
And step S15, obtaining the learning ability index of the target student based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof.
Here, the learning ability index of the target student includes data information such as chart information corresponding to the target evaluation parameter information and achievement rates of the subject abilities of each item.
Through the steps S11 to S15, the purpose that students can obtain personal individual subject ability feedback analysis by completing exercise questions is achieved, the students and teachers can learn at the present stage more clearly according to the subject ability analysis results, multiple times of learning and contact are conducted on insufficient places, the exercise effect of the students is improved, meanwhile, the teachers can conduct targeted teaching on all students in time, and burden of the teachers is relieved.
In a preferred embodiment of the application, a student A completes 10 target subjects, wherein subjects with subject capacity of "quantity relation" are a target subject 01 and a target subject 05, subjects with subject capacity of "reasoning capacity" are a target subject 06 and a target subject 10, answers input by the student A to the 10 target subjects are obtained, after the answers of the 10 target subjects are judged, if the target subject 01, the target subject 03, the target subject 07 and the target subject 10 are correct answers, and the target subject 04 and the target subject 06 are wrong answers, the subject capacities of the target subject 01, the target subject 03, the target subject 07 and the target subject 10 are recorded to reach the standard, and target capacity evaluation parameter information of the target subject 01, the target subject 03, the target subject 07 and the target subject 10 is recorded at the same time; the subject ability of the target subjects 04 and 06 is recorded as not-standard, the target ability evaluation parameter information of the target subjects 04 and 06 is recorded at the same time, and the target evaluation parameter information of the learning ability of the student A is obtained based on the target subject ability and the target ability evaluation parameter information corresponding to each target subject of the student A, wherein the expression form of the target evaluation parameter information can be a form of chart information, and can also be a data information form such as achievement rate of each subject ability.
In this embodiment, based on the answer result of each target question, the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the target student can be obtained through analysis, where the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the target student is (number of questions that the target student answers correctly/number of questions related to the certain subject ability in the practice question to be analyzed) × 100%.
For example, the student a completes 10 target subjects, which include a target subject 01, a target subject 02, a target subject 03 and a target subject 04 with subject capabilities, and determines that the answer results of the target subject 01 and the target subject 02 are correct and the answer results of the target subject 03 and the target subject 04 are incorrect according to the practice of the student on the 10 target subjects, so that the target subject capabilities corresponding to the target subject 01 and the target subject 02 are recorded as being up to standard, and simultaneously, target capability evaluation parameter information corresponding to the target subject 01 and the target subject 02 is recorded; the target subject capacity corresponding to the target subject 03 and the target subject 04 is recorded as not-up-to-standard, and simultaneously, the recording target capacity evaluation parameter information of the target subject 03 and the target subject 04 is recorded, and according to the answer results of the target student to the target subject 01, the target subject 02, the target subject 03 and the target subject 04, the achievement rate of the student in the subject capacity of one class is (2/4) × 100% ═ 50%.
Next, in the above embodiment of the present application, the total achievement rate of a certain subject ability of M target students can be obtained according to the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the M target students, where the total achievement rate of a certain subject ability of M target students is (the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the 1 st student + the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the 2 nd student + … … + the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the M th student)/M, where M is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2. In a preferred embodiment of the present application, M is preferably 3, for example, it is known that the achievement rate of a subject ability of the 1 st student is 10%, the achievement rate of a subject ability of the 2 nd student is 8.8%, and the achievement rate of a subject ability of the 3 rd student is 50%, and then the total achievement rate of a subject ability of the 3 rd student is (15% + 25% + 50%)/3 is 30%, so that the total achievement rate of a subject ability of the 3 rd student is calculated to be 30%, the calculation of the total achievement rate of the plurality of students is realized, and the total subject learning level and ability of the plurality of students are further reflected.
Next to the above embodiment of the present application, the step S12 of obtaining answers respectively made by the target students to each target topic specifically includes: and responding to the input operation of the target students, and acquiring answers made by the target students to each target topic respectively. Here, the input operation includes one or more of a text input operation, a voice input operation, an input operation of triggering a preset key, and an action input operation.
For example, if the student a wants to use the number 10 as the answer of the target topic 01, the student a may perform the text input operation of the number 10 through a computer keyboard or a mobile phone input method, may perform the voice input operation of the voice "ten" through a computer microphone or a mobile phone microphone, and may perform the action input operation of the action "ten" through a method of expressing "ten" with both hands; if the student a has a different idea after analyzing the target question to be answered, the student a may trigger a preset button, for example: adding rows to complete the input operation of own idea; if the student A needs to finish pronunciation and dictation of daily English words according to requirements, the student A can speak corresponding word pronunciation while finishing spelling of the English words through voice input operation and character input operation, so that the student can conveniently carry out arbitrary conversion of input operation according to different question requirements to enable the student to practice no longer to be limited, the participation of the student in the answering process is improved, the enthusiasm and the interestingness of the student on answering are also improved, and the application range of the application in practical application scenes is further widened.
Following the above embodiment of the present application, the target student includes at least one bit, wherein the method further includes: and obtaining the comprehensive learning capacity corresponding to the at least one target student according to the learning capacity index of each target student of the at least one target student.
Here, the expression form of the integrated learning ability may include, but is not limited to, an integrated learning ability diagram, an integrated learning ability table, an integrated learning ability bar, an integrated learning achievement rate, and the like, so as to reflect the integrated learning ability collectively presented by the respective target students.
For example, according to the learning ability indexes of all students in a first class of a fifth grade and all students in a second class of the fifth grade, the data of the learning ability indexes of all students in each class are summarized to obtain the comprehensive learning ability of the whole of the first class of the fifth grade and the comprehensive learning ability of the whole of the second class of the fifth grade, and data information such as different contents corresponding to comprehensive target evaluation parameter information and comprehensive achievement rates of all subject abilities is presented, so that the whole learning condition is conveniently known, the learning condition of the students is comprehensively analyzed, the subject managers are helped to obtain real-time subject ability analysis feedback, and teaching and research activities are carried out in time. Following the above embodiment of the present application, the method further includes: and creating an item bank corresponding to at least one discipline ability, wherein the item bank corresponding to each discipline ability comprises at least one item and corresponding ability evaluation parameter information thereof.
It should be noted that the capability evaluation parameter information corresponding to each topic in the topic library includes: capability assessment parameters and capability assessment parameter values, wherein the capability assessment parameters include subject capabilities, goals, learning levels, difficulty, content areas, and learning level parameter values include, but are not limited to, learning, understanding, exercising, synthesizing, and the like.
For example, the topic 1 is entered into the question bank, and the question stem of the topic 1 is: "the height of small child is 115 cm, small is smaller than small child, and the small size cannot be (). A.1 m 20 mm B.109 cm C.1 m 20 cm ", the correct answer to topic 1 is: c, and the corresponding capability assessment parameter information is: the subject ability is 'reasoning ability', the aim is 'unit conversion between meters and centimeters can be performed, the unit conversion between a compound unit containing the meters and the centimeters is included, the simple mathematic problem is solved,' the learning level is 'comprehensive', the difficulty level is '4', the content field is 'graph and geometry', obviously, the problem is different from most of problem libraries, the problem of the application not only comprises a problem stem, but also comprises capability assessment parameter information corresponding to the problem, the problem classification is more precise, student exercises are more targeted, and a foundation is laid for later-stage student personalized analysis.
In this embodiment, according to creating a question bank corresponding to at least one subject ability and the answers made by the target students to the questions in the question bank, the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of each target student and the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of some students can be obtained through analysis.
Setting the number of all exercise questions to be analyzed as T, N being each discipline ability, TNThe number of questions, Z, associated with each discipline ability in the practice question to be analyzedX NThe students with number X answer correct number of questions, wherein X is 1, 2, 3, … …, (m-1) or m, m is total number of students, DX NFor the achievement rate of a certain subject ability of the student, then: dX N＝(ZX N/TN)×100％；DN is totalFor part of students in whole class, whole school or certain areaOverall achievement rate of department ability, thenN is total＝(D1 N+D2 N+……+Dm N)/m。
Next, in the above embodiment of the present application, the determining at least one target topic to be answered by the target student includes: and screening out at least one target topic to be replied by the target student from the topic library corresponding to the at least one subject ability.
It should be noted that when the target student filters the target subject to be answered, the target student can randomly filter the subject database, and can also directionally specify the exercise filtering for the subject database. For example, according to the statistics of the last learning ability index, the achievement rate that the learning level of the student A needs to be enhanced to be 'understanding', the student B needs to carry out breakthrough practice on the subject with the grade of '3', the whole learning ability index of the student C is stable, the student A can screen the subject with the learning level of 'understanding' in the subject library for practice, the student B can screen the subject with the difficulty registered to be '3' in the subject library for practice, the student C can select random screening subjects for practice, the fact that the student selects the subjects in the subject library according to the requirement of the student A is achieved, the practice effect of the student is improved, the medicine is given according to the symptoms, the learning defects are timely made up, and therefore the learning performance of the student is effectively improved.
As shown in FIG. 2, a new topic 01 is entered into the question bank, wherein the question stem of the topic 01 is "one object falls from high altitude and lands after 3 seconds. It is known that the first second falls over a distance of 4.9 meters, and each subsequent second falls over a distance of 9.8 meters more than the previous second. The object is spaced from the ground by () meter before falling, the subject ability in the target ability evaluation parameter information associated with the subject 01 is 'number relation', the target is 'knowing that the operation law and subtraction property of integer addition are applicable to decimal addition and subtraction', the learning level is 'comprehensive', the difficulty level is '3', and the content field is 'number and operation'. The correct answer of the new subject 01 is recorded as '44.1', and the filling of the correct answer is regarded as that the subject ability reaches the standard. And the other answers are wrong answers, and the subject ability corresponding to the question does not reach the standard. If the student submits the answer of '44.1', the answer is correct, and the subject ability record of the acquired subject reaches the standard; if the answer submitted by the student is not '44.1', the answer is wrong, and the subject ability of the acquired subject is recorded as not reaching the standard.
And acquiring and recording target ability evaluation parameter information of the subject 01 according to the result of the answer submitted by the students, presenting a chart and data of the learning ability of the target student based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof, and completing the ability analysis of a single subject of a single student.
Through all the embodiments of the application, various application roles such as education management departments, schools, teachers, students and the like can obtain real-time discipline capability analysis reports; weak subject ability and advantage ability of students can be positioned; the learning data is automatically counted and analyzed, and the analysis precision and accuracy are high; subject ability analysis and tracking of development can be performed for each subject.
In summary, the present application determines at least one target topic to be answered by the target student; obtaining answers which are respectively made by the target students to each target question; respectively judging whether the answer corresponding to each target question is a correct answer or not to obtain the answer result of each target question; respectively acquiring target subject ability and target ability evaluation parameter information thereof corresponding to each target subject based on each target subject answer result; the learning ability index of the target student is obtained based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof, so that real-time subject ability feedback analysis is timely obtained through accompanying exercise of the student, personalized learning is carried out according to the subject ability analysis, the exercise effect of the student is improved, meanwhile, the burden reduction and the efficiency increase are realized for teachers, the fact that subject managers obtain real-time subject ability analysis feedback is facilitated, and targeted teaching and teaching activities are timely carried out.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the present application is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrative embodiments, and that the present application may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the application being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein. Any reference sign in a claim should not be construed as limiting the claim concerned. Furthermore, it is obvious that the word "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps, and the singular does not exclude the plural. A plurality of units or means recited in the apparatus claims may also be implemented by one unit or means in software or hardware. The terms first, second, etc. are used to denote names, but not any particular order.
Claims (6)
1. A learning ability analysis method, wherein the method comprises:
determining at least one target topic to be answered by the target student;
obtaining answers which are respectively made by the target students to each target question;
respectively judging whether the answer corresponding to each target question is a correct answer or not to obtain the answer result of each target question;
respectively acquiring target subject ability and target ability evaluation parameter information thereof corresponding to each target subject based on each target subject answer result;
and obtaining the learning ability index of the target student based on the target subject ability corresponding to each target subject and the target ability evaluation parameter information thereof.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the obtaining answers respectively made by the target students to each of the target topics comprises:
and responding to the input operation of the target students, and acquiring answers made by the target students to each target topic.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the input operation comprises one or more of a text input operation, an input operation triggering a preset key, a voice input operation, an input operation triggering a preset key, and an action input operation.
4. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the target student comprises at least one digit, wherein the method further comprises:
and obtaining the comprehensive learning capacity corresponding to the at least one target student according to the learning capacity index of each target student of the at least one target student.
5. The method of any of claims 1-3, wherein the method further comprises:
and creating an item bank corresponding to at least one discipline ability, wherein the item bank corresponding to each discipline ability comprises at least one item and corresponding ability evaluation parameter information thereof.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the determining at least one target topic to be answered by the target student comprises:
and screening out at least one target topic to be replied by the target student from the topic library corresponding to the at least one subject ability.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111417710.0A CN114038258A (en) | 2021-11-25 | 2021-11-25 | Learning ability analysis method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111417710.0A CN114038258A (en) | 2021-11-25 | 2021-11-25 | Learning ability analysis method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114038258A true CN114038258A (en) | 2022-02-11 |
Family
ID=80145716
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111417710.0A Pending CN114038258A (en) | 2021-11-25 | 2021-11-25 | Learning ability analysis method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114038258A (en) |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106340219A (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2017-01-18 | 广东小天才科技有限公司 | Topic recommendation method and system and related equipment |
| CN107563924A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-09 | 哈尔滨成长科技有限公司 | Test paper generation method, medium and electronic equipment |
| CN109118861A (en) * | 2017-06-26 | 2019-01-01 | 蒋兵兵 | A kind of individualized intelligent tutoring system |
| CN110189238A (en) * | 2019-05-22 | 2019-08-30 | 网易有道信息技术(北京)有限公司江苏分公司 | Method, apparatus, medium and the electronic equipment of assisted learning |
| KR20200012431A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2020-02-05 | (주)웅진씽크빅 | Method for providing an information of a question analysis using big data |
| CN111914176A (en) * | 2020-08-07 | 2020-11-10 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and device for recommending subjects |
| CN112614030A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-06 | 贵州树精英教育科技有限责任公司 | Learning ability level diagnosis system |
-
2021
- 2021-11-25 CN CN202111417710.0A patent/CN114038258A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106340219A (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2017-01-18 | 广东小天才科技有限公司 | Topic recommendation method and system and related equipment |
| CN109118861A (en) * | 2017-06-26 | 2019-01-01 | 蒋兵兵 | A kind of individualized intelligent tutoring system |
| CN107563924A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-09 | 哈尔滨成长科技有限公司 | Test paper generation method, medium and electronic equipment |
| KR20200012431A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2020-02-05 | (주)웅진씽크빅 | Method for providing an information of a question analysis using big data |
| CN110189238A (en) * | 2019-05-22 | 2019-08-30 | 网易有道信息技术(北京)有限公司江苏分公司 | Method, apparatus, medium and the electronic equipment of assisted learning |
| CN111914176A (en) * | 2020-08-07 | 2020-11-10 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and device for recommending subjects |
| CN112614030A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-06 | 贵州树精英教育科技有限责任公司 | Learning ability level diagnosis system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Garfield | Assessing statistical reasoning | |
| Platzer | The role of Quizlet in vocabulary acquisition. | |
| O Olumorin et al. | Computer-based tests: a system of assessing academic performance in university of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria | |
| CN110716917A (en) | Reading evaluation method and system based on integral system | |
| KR101488178B1 (en) | System of a sham examination and study using application | |
| Sondergeld et al. | Objective standard setting in educational assessment and decision making | |
| CN112766807A (en) | Method for evaluating teaching quality of students | |
| Jacobs et al. | Item difficulty analysis of a high-stakes mathematics examination using Rasch analysis | |
| Elrod et al. | A comparison of students’ quantitative reasoning skills in STEM and non-STEM math pathways | |
| Dichoso et al. | Test item analyzer using point-biserial correlation and p-values | |
| CN111553555A (en) | Training method, training device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114038258A (en) | Learning ability analysis method | |
| Wang et al. | Using Burke's Dramatistic Pentad to Interpret Chinese" Gao-Kao" High Stakes Testing and Stressing-Paralleled Testing in the US as Cross-Cultural Context | |
| Abbott | Assessing student understanding of* measurement and uncertainty | |
| Hitchcock et al. | Hierarchical linear modeling with qualitative data that have been quantitized | |
| ADENIRAN et al. | THE STAKEHOLDERS’RESPONSIBILITIES IN MANAGING EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS, IN LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA | |
| Katz et al. | Investigating the factor structure of the iSkills™ assessment | |
| CN112785176A (en) | Comprehensive quality evaluation processing method for students | |
| Arkhipova et al. | Specific aspects of information and communication technologies application by teachers within the inclusive education | |
| Buriro et al. | Social media tools at developing academic writing skills | |
| Pouezevara et al. | Using information and communication technologies to support EGRA | |
| Ofem et al. | Predictive Analysis of Research Competence on Thesis Completion Rate among Postgraduate Students in Universities in South-South Geopolitical Region, Nigeria. | |
| Yildirim et al. | Using the Delphi Technique and Focus-Group Interviews to Determine Item Bias on the Mathematics Section of the Level Determination Exam for 2012. | |
| Huang et al. | Analysis of Students' Error In Solving Probability Problem: A Case Study In Guangxi | |
| CN111915227B (en) | Teaching evaluation data analysis method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |