CN114006849A - Wired connection network quality evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium - Google Patents

Wired connection network quality evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114006849A
CN114006849A CN202111155836.5A CN202111155836A CN114006849A CN 114006849 A CN114006849 A CN 114006849A CN 202111155836 A CN202111155836 A CN 202111155836A CN 114006849 A CN114006849 A CN 114006849A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
data
driving parameter
test
supportable
parameter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202111155836.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN114006849B (en
Inventor
朱垚
权少强
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shenzhen Lianzhou International Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shenzhen Lianzhou International Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shenzhen Lianzhou International Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Shenzhen Lianzhou International Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN202111155836.5A priority Critical patent/CN114006849B/en
Publication of CN114006849A publication Critical patent/CN114006849A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN114006849B publication Critical patent/CN114006849B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/50Testing arrangements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B3/00Line transmission systems
    • H04B3/02Details
    • H04B3/46Monitoring; Testing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0823Errors, e.g. transmission errors
    • H04L43/0829Packet loss
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0823Errors, e.g. transmission errors
    • H04L43/0847Transmission error
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/16Threshold monitoring

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of communication, and discloses a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring the actual line length of the connected network cable; traversing and testing the driving parameters to obtain a critical value of the driving parameters; acquiring a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length; if the actual line length is larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is good; and if the actual line length is not larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is poor. The invention provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network, which can evaluate the network quality of a wired connection mode.

Description

Wired connection network quality evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, a device, and a storage medium for evaluating quality of a wired connection network.
Background
The wired connection method is the most common connection method in the existing connection network because of its advantages such as low price and convenient installation.
In the wiring stage of the wired connection mode, the network cable is tested by depending on a network cable tester, special equipment needs to be purchased firstly, and then the equipment can only carry out simple on-off and correct line sequence connection test, and key parameters directly influencing network communication stability such as network quality or whether the length of the network cable is too long cannot be detected.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network, which are used for evaluating the network quality of a wired connection mode.
In order to solve the above technical problem, in a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating quality of a wired connection network, where the method includes:
acquiring the actual line length of the connected network cable;
traversing and testing the driving parameters to obtain a critical value of the driving parameters;
acquiring a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length;
if the actual line length is larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is good;
and if the actual line length is not larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is poor.
As a preferable aspect, the method further includes:
acquiring a drive parameter default value;
based on the relation between a preset driving parameter and a supportable wire length, acquiring a second supportable wire length corresponding to the preset driving parameter according to the default value of the driving parameter;
when the network connection quality is good, comparing the drive parameter default value with the drive parameter critical value;
if the default value of the driving parameter is not less than the critical value of the driving parameter, acquiring a wire length allowance based on the second supportable wire length and the actual wire length;
and if the drive parameter default value is smaller than the drive parameter critical value, acquiring a drive parameter output value based on the drive parameter critical value.
As a preferred scheme, the traversing test of the driving parameters to obtain the critical value of the driving parameters specifically includes:
sending first test data to test equipment under each drive parameter;
receiving first return data returned by the test equipment, wherein the first return data is data received by the test equipment based on the first test data;
comparing the received data with the first test data, and calculating a first data packet loss rate and/or a first data error rate;
and acquiring the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated first data packet loss rate and/or first data error rate.
As a preferred scheme, the traversing test of the driving parameters to obtain the critical value of the driving parameters specifically includes:
sending second test data to the test equipment under each drive parameter;
receiving second return data and third test data returned by the test equipment, wherein the second return data is a second data packet loss rate and/or a second data error rate calculated by the test equipment based on the second test data;
comparing the data received based on the third test data with the third test data, and calculating a third data packet loss rate and/or a third data error rate;
and acquiring the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated second data packet loss rate and/or second data error rate and third data packet loss rate and/or third data error rate.
In order to solve the above technical problem, in a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus for evaluating quality of a wired connection network, where the apparatus includes:
the actual line length acquisition module is used for acquiring the actual line length of the connected network cable;
the driving parameter critical value acquisition module is used for performing traversal test on the driving parameters to acquire a driving parameter critical value;
the first supportable wire length acquisition module is used for acquiring a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length;
the first evaluation module is used for judging that the network connection quality is good if the actual wire length is larger than the first supportable wire length;
and the second evaluation module is used for judging that the network connection quality is poor if the actual line length is not greater than the first supportable line length.
As a preferable aspect, the apparatus further includes:
the driving parameter default value acquisition module is used for acquiring a driving parameter default value;
the second supportable wire length acquisition module is used for acquiring a second supportable wire length corresponding to the preset drive parameter according to the default value of the drive parameter based on the relation between the preset drive parameter and the supportable wire length;
the driving parameter comparison module is used for comparing the default value of the driving parameter with the critical value of the driving parameter when the network connection quality is good;
a line length allowance obtaining module, configured to obtain a line length allowance based on the second supportable line length and the actual line length if the default value of the driving parameter is not smaller than the critical value of the driving parameter;
and the driving parameter adjusting module is used for acquiring a driving parameter output value based on the driving parameter critical value if the driving parameter default value is smaller than the driving parameter critical value.
As a preferred scheme, the driving parameter critical value obtaining module specifically includes:
the first data sending unit is used for sending first test data to the test equipment under each driving parameter;
the first data receiving unit is used for receiving first return data returned by the test equipment, wherein the first return data is data received by the test equipment based on the first test data;
the first calculation unit is used for comparing the received data with the first test data and calculating a first data packet loss rate and/or a first data error rate;
and the first driving parameter critical value obtaining unit is used for obtaining the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated first data packet loss rate and/or first data error rate.
As a preferred scheme, the driving parameter critical value obtaining module specifically includes:
the second data sending unit is used for sending second test data to the test equipment under each driving parameter;
a second data receiving unit, configured to receive second return data and third test data returned by the test device, where the second return data is a second data packet loss rate and/or a second data error rate calculated by the test device based on the second test data;
the second calculating unit is used for comparing the data received based on the third test data with the third test data and calculating a third data packet loss rate and/or a third data error rate;
and the second driving parameter critical value obtaining unit is used for obtaining the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated second data packet loss rate and/or second data error rate and third data packet loss rate and/or third data error rate.
In order to solve the above technical problem, in a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a communication apparatus, including:
a memory for storing a computer program;
a processor for executing the computer program;
wherein the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the method for wired connection network quality assessment according to any of the first aspect.
In order to solve the above technical problem, in a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program that, when executed, implements the wired connection network quality evaluation method according to any one of the first aspects.
Compared with the prior art, the method, the device, the equipment and the storage medium for evaluating the quality of the wired connection network provided by the embodiment of the invention have the beneficial effects that: after the actual line length of the network cable and the supportable line length corresponding to the driving parameter critical value are obtained, the actual line length of the network cable and the supportable line length corresponding to the driving parameter critical value are compared, the connection quality of a wired connection mode can be judged and evaluated quickly, and when the network connection quality is poor, problems can be diagnosed and positioned, so that the network connection quality is guaranteed.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical features of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly described below, and it is apparent that the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained based on the drawings without inventive labor.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a method for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a preferred embodiment of a device for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network according to the present invention;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a preferred embodiment of a wired connection network quality evaluation device provided by the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to clearly understand the technical features, objects and effects of the present invention, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is provided with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. The following examples are intended to illustrate the invention, but are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Other embodiments, which can be derived by those skilled in the art from the embodiments of the present invention without inventive step, shall fall within the scope of the present invention.
In the description of the present invention, it should be understood that the numbers themselves, such as "first", "second", etc., are used only for distinguishing the described objects, do not have a sequential or technical meaning, and cannot be understood as defining or implying the importance of the described objects.
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the method includes:
s11: acquiring the actual line length of the connected network cable;
s12: traversing and testing the driving parameters to obtain a critical value of the driving parameters;
s13: acquiring a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length;
s14: if the actual line length is larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is good;
s15: and if the actual line length is not larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is poor.
It should be noted that the network port driving signal of the wired communication device usually includes a plurality of driving parameters, such as A, B, C, and each driving parameter has a plurality of adjustable levels, such as 1-16 levels. Before the implementation of the present invention, the driving parameters need to be subjected to a combined traversal test, and a supportable line length obtained by the test under each combination is correspondingly obtained (which may be simply determined according to the link instability or the link failure, when the driving parameter is adjusted to a certain value, and is continuously reduced, the link instability or the link failure is caused, the driving parameter configuration value is a critical value, or may be determined according to the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate, when the driving parameter is adjusted to a certain value, and is continuously reduced, the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate is greater than a preset threshold value, the driving parameter configuration value is a critical value), and the finally obtained test result is the corresponding relationship between the driving parameter and the supportable line length. The correspondence is a reference relationship obtained under laboratory conditions, and may be one-dimensional, multidimensional, linear, or nonlinear, and for ease of understanding, the following description will be given by taking one-dimensional as an example. As an example, the correspondence between the driving parameters and the supportable line lengths is shown in table 1.
TABLE 1
Drive parameter configuration values A1~A3 A4~A7 A8~A11 A12~A16
Supportable line length 105m 115m 120m 130m
When the invention is embodied, firstly, the actual line length L of the connected network line is determined through the CVT line length detection function of the network chip of the wired communication equipment. And then, in the actual application environment, performing a combined traversal test on the driving parameters to find out a critical value An of the driving parameters, so as to obtain a corresponding relation of An-L in the actual application environment. Then, a first supportable line length L1 corresponding to An is found out from the stored relationship between the preset driving parameters and the supportable line length, so as to obtain the corresponding relationship of An-L1 under the laboratory conditions. And finally, comparing the length of the L with that of the L1, wherein if the L is larger than the L1, the user wiring network is superior to the laboratory standard, and the network connection quality is excellent, and if the L is not larger than the L1, the user wiring network is inferior to the laboratory standard, and the network connection quality is poor.
As an example, in an actual application environment, the VCT detection line length is obtained as L90 m, the driving parameter threshold value is obtained as a5, and the supportable line length corresponding to the driving parameter threshold value a5 under a laboratory condition is obtained as L1 m, and since L is less than L1, it can be determined that the network connection quality is poor.
Preferably, when the network connection quality is poor, the diagnosis and positioning of specific problem points such as poor network cable quality, poor network connector quality, or excessive bending of the network cable are performed in combination with the plurality of driving parameters.
As another example, in an actual application environment, the VCT detection line length is 118m, the driving parameter threshold value is a5, and the supportable line length corresponding to the driving parameter threshold value a5 under a laboratory condition is L1 m, which is greater than L1, so that it can be determined that the network connection quality is good.
According to the quality evaluation method for the wired connection network, after the actual line length of the network cable and the supportable line length corresponding to the driving parameter critical value are obtained, the actual line length of the network cable and the supportable line length are compared, the connection quality of the wired connection mode can be judged and evaluated quickly, and when the network connection quality is poor, problems can be diagnosed and positioned, so that the network connection quality is guaranteed.
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises:
s16: acquiring a drive parameter default value;
s17: based on the relation between a preset driving parameter and a supportable wire length, acquiring a second supportable wire length corresponding to the preset driving parameter according to the default value of the driving parameter;
s18: when the network connection quality is good, comparing the drive parameter default value with the drive parameter critical value;
s19: if the default value of the driving parameter is not less than the critical value of the driving parameter, acquiring a wire length allowance based on the second supportable wire length and the actual wire length;
s110: and if the drive parameter default value is smaller than the drive parameter critical value, acquiring a drive parameter output value based on the drive parameter critical value.
Specifically, in the wired communication device, a default value a0 of the driving parameter is preset, and after the default value a0 of the driving parameter is obtained, the second supportable wire length L2 corresponding to a0 is found out based on the stored relationship between the preset driving parameter and the supportable wire length. When the network connection quality is good (namely when L is more than L1), comparing A0 with An, if A0 is more than or equal to An, the drive parameter default value can maintain the good connection of the network, and further calculating to obtain a wire length margin L3 which is L2-L; if a0 < An, it means that the default value of the driving parameter cannot be used to connect to the network well, and the output value of the driving parameter needs to be adjusted to be larger than the critical value of the driving parameter, and the wire length margin can be further obtained after the adjustment. After the wire length margin is obtained, it can also be fed back to the user or the wiring person. Or it may also suggest to adjust the driving parameters to higher values, ensuring that the network connection is more stable.
As an example, the default value of the driving parameter is a9, the critical value of the driving parameter is a5, the length of the VCT detection line is L118 m, and the supportable line length of a9 is L2 m 120m, at this time, a9 is greater than a5, then a9 can maintain good connection of the network, and calculate the line length margin L3-L2-L120-118 m 2m, then the network can be timely increased by 2m, the network can also maintain good connection, and the line length margin is intuitively fed back to the user or the wiring personnel in a manner that the network can increase the length. Further, it is also possible to propose to adjust the driving parameters to a12 to a16, where the line length margin L3-L2-L130-118-12 m, and the mesh line increasing length becomes 12 m.
In a preferred embodiment, the performing a traversal test on the driving parameter to obtain a critical value of the driving parameter specifically includes:
s121: sending first test data to test equipment under each drive parameter;
s122: receiving first return data returned by the test equipment, wherein the first return data is data received by the test equipment based on the first test data;
s123: comparing the received data with the first test data, and calculating a first data packet loss rate and/or a first data error rate;
s124: and acquiring the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated first data packet loss rate and/or first data error rate.
Specifically, in this embodiment, the test device does not support the test data sending function and the data statistics function, in this case, the test device only sends the test request to the test device of the opposite end through the local wired communication device, and the test device enters the test mode after receiving the test request. The wire communication equipment at the local end configures the driving parameters as An, the testing equipment at the remote end configures the network chip as a loop mode, and at the moment, the testing equipment receives any testing data and returns the testing data to the wire communication equipment at the local end as it is. And the wired communication equipment at the local terminal counts the received return data, compares the received return data with the sent test data, and calculates the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate. And after An is traversed, comparing the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate obtained by the respective tests of A1-A16 with a preset threshold, wherein if the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate are less than a certain driving parameter configuration value and are greater than the preset threshold, the driving parameter configuration value is the driving parameter critical value.
In the embodiment, the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate are used as the judgment criteria to determine the driving parameter threshold, so that compared with the case of whether the link is stable, an accurate network connection quality evaluation result can be obtained.
In a preferred embodiment, the performing a traversal test on the driving parameter to obtain a critical value of the driving parameter specifically includes:
s121': sending second test data to the test equipment under each drive parameter;
s122': receiving second return data and third test data returned by the test equipment, wherein the second return data is a second data packet loss rate and/or a second data error rate calculated by the test equipment based on the second test data;
s123': comparing the data received based on the third test data with the third test data, and calculating a third data packet loss rate and/or a third data error rate;
s124': and acquiring the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated second data packet loss rate and/or second data error rate and third data packet loss rate and/or third data error rate.
Specifically, in this embodiment, the test device has a test data transmission function and a data statistics function, in this case, the wired communication device at the home terminal transmits a test request to the test device at the opposite terminal, and the test device enters the test mode after receiving the test request. The wired communication equipment of the local terminal configures the driving parameters into An, sends the configuration parameters to the remote testing equipment before starting to send the testing data, and informs the testing equipment of the format of the testing data to be sent and the number of messages in the data transceiving test to be carried out. After the wired communication device at the home terminal sends a specific test data message to the test device, the test device needs to count the number of the received test data messages, calculate the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate based on the previously received test data format and the number of the messages, and then return the calculation result to the wired communication device at the home terminal. Meanwhile, the remote testing device also sends testing data, that is, the third testing data, to the local wired communication device with the same driving parameter configuration An, the data does not depend on the received data sent by the wired communication device, but the same testing data format and the same number of messages are sent by the local wired communication device through early notification of the local wired communication device at the beginning, and the local wired communication device further performs data packet loss rate and/or data error rate based on the received data. And after An is traversed, comparing the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate obtained by the respective tests of A1-A16 with a preset threshold, wherein if the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate are less than a certain driving parameter configuration value and are greater than the preset threshold, the driving parameter configuration value is the driving parameter critical value.
In the embodiment, the data packet loss rate and/or the data error rate are used as the judgment standard to determine the critical value of the driving parameter, and compared with the method that whether link is stable or not can obtain an accurate network connection quality evaluation result, the test is accurately refined to the two directions of sending and receiving, the two directions do not influence each other, and the network connection quality evaluation result can be obtained more objectively.
It should be noted that the above evaluation process is only one rate mode for the wired communication device, and the present invention can also perform evaluation in different rate modes. For example, network communication is common in 10M, 100M, 1000M, 2.5G, 5G, 10G, etc., and different communication devices may support one or more rate modes. Under different speed modes, adjustable driving parameters, defined and configurable values are different, and corresponding relations of line lengths are different, so that training, learning and evaluation processes of the corresponding relations under different speed modes are independent processes, and network quality evaluation of each speed mode can be realized.
It should be understood that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned wired connection network quality assessment method can be implemented by a computer program, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium and can implement the steps of the above-mentioned wired connection network quality assessment method when being executed by a processor. Wherein the computer program comprises computer program code, which may be in the form of source code, object code, an executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, usb disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, Read-Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier wave signals, telecommunications signals, software distribution medium, and the like. It should be noted that the computer readable medium may contain other components which may be suitably increased or decreased as required by legislation and patent practice in jurisdictions, for example, in some jurisdictions, in accordance with legislation and patent practice, the computer readable medium does not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunications signals.
Fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a wired connection network quality evaluation apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, which is capable of implementing all the processes of the wired connection network quality evaluation method described in any of the above embodiments and achieving corresponding technical effects.
As shown in fig. 2, the apparatus includes:
an actual line length obtaining module 21, configured to obtain an actual line length of a connected network line;
the driving parameter critical value obtaining module 22 is configured to perform traversal test on the driving parameter to obtain a driving parameter critical value;
a first supportable wire length obtaining module 23, configured to obtain a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length;
the first evaluation module 24 is configured to determine that the network connection quality is good if the actual line length is greater than the first supportable line length;
and a second evaluation module 25, configured to determine that the network connection quality is poor if the actual line length is not greater than the first supportable line length.
In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus further comprises:
a driving parameter default value obtaining module 26, configured to obtain a driving parameter default value;
a second supportable wire length obtaining module 27, configured to obtain, based on a relationship between a preset driving parameter and a supportable wire length, a second supportable wire length corresponding to the preset driving parameter according to the driving parameter default value;
a driving parameter comparing module 28, configured to compare the default driving parameter with the critical driving parameter value when the network connection quality is good;
a line length allowance obtaining module 29, configured to obtain a line length allowance based on the second supportable line length and the actual line length if the default value of the driving parameter is not smaller than the critical value of the driving parameter;
the driving parameter adjusting module 210 is configured to obtain a driving parameter output value based on the driving parameter critical value if the driving parameter default value is smaller than the driving parameter critical value.
In a preferred embodiment, the driving parameter critical value obtaining module 22 specifically includes:
a first data transmitting unit 221, configured to transmit first test data to the test device under each driving parameter;
a first data receiving unit 222, configured to receive first return data returned by the test device, where the first return data is data received by the test device based on the first test data;
the first calculating unit 223 is configured to compare the received data with the first test data, and calculate a first data packet loss rate and/or a first data error rate;
the first driving parameter threshold obtaining unit 224 is configured to obtain the driving parameter threshold according to the calculated first data packet loss rate and/or first data error rate.
In a preferred embodiment, the driving parameter critical value obtaining module 22 specifically includes:
a second data transmitting unit 221' for transmitting second test data to the test device under each driving parameter;
a second data receiving unit 222' configured to receive second return data and third test data returned by the test device, where the second return data is a second data packet loss rate and/or a second data error rate calculated by the test device based on the second test data;
the second calculating unit 223' is configured to compare the data received based on the third test data with the third test data, and calculate a third data packet loss rate and/or a third data error rate;
the second driving parameter critical value obtaining unit 224' is configured to obtain the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated second data packet loss rate and/or second data error rate and the third data packet loss rate and/or third data error rate.
Fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a preferred embodiment of a wired connection network quality assessment apparatus according to the present invention, which is capable of implementing all processes of the wired connection network quality assessment method described in any of the above embodiments and achieving corresponding technical effects.
As shown in fig. 3, the apparatus includes:
a memory 31 for storing a computer program;
a processor 32 for executing the computer program;
wherein the processor 32, when executing the computer program, implements the method for evaluating the quality of the wired connection network according to any of the above embodiments.
Illustratively, the computer program may be divided into one or more modules/units, which are stored in the memory 31 and executed by the processor 32 to accomplish the present invention. The one or more modules/units may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of performing specific functions, which are used to describe the execution process of the computer program in the quality evaluation device of the wired connection network.
The Processor 32 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, discrete Gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, etc. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.
The memory 31 may be used to store the computer programs and/or modules, and the processor 32 may implement various functions of the wired connection network quality evaluation device by running or executing the computer programs and/or modules stored in the memory 31 and calling data stored in the memory 31. The memory 31 may mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store an operating system, an application program required by at least one function (such as a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.), and the like; the storage data area may store data (such as audio data, a phonebook, etc.) created according to the use of the cellular phone, and the like. In addition, the memory 31 may include a high speed random access memory, and may also include a non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), at least one magnetic disk storage device, a Flash memory device, or other volatile solid state storage device.
It should be noted that the above-mentioned wired connection network quality evaluation device includes, but is not limited to, a processor and a memory, and those skilled in the art will understand that the schematic diagram of the structure in fig. 3 is only an example of the above-mentioned wired connection network quality evaluation device, and does not constitute a limitation of the wired connection network quality evaluation device, and may include more components than those shown in the figure, or combine some components, or different components.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, several equivalent obvious modifications and/or equivalent substitutions can be made without departing from the technical principle of the present invention, and these obvious modifications and/or equivalent substitutions should also be regarded as the scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A method for assessing the quality of a wired connection network, the method comprising:
acquiring the actual line length of the connected network cable;
traversing and testing the driving parameters to obtain a critical value of the driving parameters;
acquiring a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length;
if the actual line length is larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is good;
and if the actual line length is not larger than the first supportable line length, judging that the network connection quality is poor.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
acquiring a drive parameter default value;
based on the relation between a preset driving parameter and a supportable wire length, acquiring a second supportable wire length corresponding to the preset driving parameter according to the default value of the driving parameter;
when the network connection quality is good, comparing the drive parameter default value with the drive parameter critical value;
if the default value of the driving parameter is not less than the critical value of the driving parameter, acquiring a wire length allowance based on the second supportable wire length and the actual wire length;
and if the drive parameter default value is smaller than the drive parameter critical value, acquiring a drive parameter output value based on the drive parameter critical value.
3. The method for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network according to claim 1, wherein the step of performing a traversal test on the driving parameters to obtain the critical values of the driving parameters comprises:
sending first test data to test equipment under each drive parameter;
receiving first return data returned by the test equipment, wherein the first return data is data received by the test equipment based on the first test data;
comparing the received data with the first test data, and calculating a first data packet loss rate and/or a first data error rate;
and acquiring the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated first data packet loss rate and/or first data error rate.
4. The method for evaluating the quality of a wired connection network according to claim 1, wherein the step of performing a traversal test on the driving parameters to obtain the critical values of the driving parameters comprises:
sending second test data to the test equipment under each drive parameter;
receiving second return data and third test data returned by the test equipment, wherein the second return data is a second data packet loss rate and/or a second data error rate calculated by the test equipment based on the second test data;
comparing the data received based on the third test data with the third test data, and calculating a third data packet loss rate and/or a third data error rate;
and acquiring the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated second data packet loss rate and/or second data error rate and third data packet loss rate and/or third data error rate.
5. An apparatus for evaluating quality of a wired connection network, the apparatus comprising:
the actual line length acquisition module is used for acquiring the actual line length of the connected network cable;
the driving parameter critical value acquisition module is used for performing traversal test on the driving parameters to acquire a driving parameter critical value;
the first supportable wire length acquisition module is used for acquiring a first supportable wire length corresponding to a preset driving parameter critical value according to the relation between the driving parameter and the supportable wire length;
the first evaluation module is used for judging that the network connection quality is good if the actual wire length is larger than the first supportable wire length;
and the second evaluation module is used for judging that the network connection quality is poor if the actual line length is not greater than the first supportable line length.
6. The apparatus for evaluating quality of a wired connection network according to claim 5, further comprising:
the driving parameter default value acquisition module is used for acquiring a driving parameter default value;
the second supportable wire length acquisition module is used for acquiring a second supportable wire length corresponding to the preset drive parameter according to the default value of the drive parameter based on the relation between the preset drive parameter and the supportable wire length;
the driving parameter comparison module is used for comparing the default value of the driving parameter with the critical value of the driving parameter when the network connection quality is good;
a line length allowance obtaining module, configured to obtain a line length allowance based on the second supportable line length and the actual line length if the default value of the driving parameter is not smaller than the critical value of the driving parameter;
and the driving parameter adjusting module is used for acquiring a driving parameter output value based on the driving parameter critical value if the driving parameter default value is smaller than the driving parameter critical value.
7. The apparatus for evaluating quality of a wired connection network according to claim 6, wherein the driving parameter threshold obtaining module specifically comprises:
the first data sending unit is used for sending first test data to the test equipment under each driving parameter;
the first data receiving unit is used for receiving first return data returned by the test equipment, wherein the first return data is data received by the test equipment based on the first test data;
the first calculation unit is used for comparing the received data with the first test data and calculating a first data packet loss rate and/or a first data error rate;
and the first driving parameter critical value obtaining unit is used for obtaining the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated first data packet loss rate and/or first data error rate.
8. The apparatus for evaluating quality of a wired connection network according to claim 6, wherein the driving parameter threshold obtaining module specifically comprises:
the second data sending unit is used for sending second test data to the test equipment under each driving parameter;
a second data receiving unit, configured to receive second return data and third test data returned by the test device, where the second return data is a second data packet loss rate and/or a second data error rate calculated by the test device based on the second test data;
the second calculating unit is used for comparing the data received based on the third test data with the third test data and calculating a third data packet loss rate and/or a third data error rate;
and the second driving parameter critical value obtaining unit is used for obtaining the driving parameter critical value according to the calculated second data packet loss rate and/or second data error rate and third data packet loss rate and/or third data error rate.
9. A wired connection network quality evaluation device, characterized in that the device comprises:
a memory for storing a computer program;
a processor for executing the computer program;
wherein the processor implements the wired connection network quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 when executing the computer program.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed, implements the wired connection network quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
CN202111155836.5A 2021-09-28 2021-09-28 Method, device, equipment and storage medium for evaluating quality of wired connection network Active CN114006849B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111155836.5A CN114006849B (en) 2021-09-28 2021-09-28 Method, device, equipment and storage medium for evaluating quality of wired connection network

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111155836.5A CN114006849B (en) 2021-09-28 2021-09-28 Method, device, equipment and storage medium for evaluating quality of wired connection network

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114006849A true CN114006849A (en) 2022-02-01
CN114006849B CN114006849B (en) 2023-09-05

Family

ID=79922138

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202111155836.5A Active CN114006849B (en) 2021-09-28 2021-09-28 Method, device, equipment and storage medium for evaluating quality of wired connection network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114006849B (en)

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101499822A (en) * 2009-03-04 2009-08-05 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Outputting power regulating system and method for terminal port on Ethernet switch
US20090252054A1 (en) * 2008-04-02 2009-10-08 Ozdal Barkan Reduced Power Transmission
CN101777935A (en) * 2009-01-12 2010-07-14 瑞昱半导体股份有限公司 Network communication device for improving connection quality and method thereof
US20110243206A1 (en) * 2010-03-30 2011-10-06 Texas Instruments Incorporated Power back-off mode and circuit for 100baset
US8190790B1 (en) * 2011-05-31 2012-05-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Storage apparatus and method of controlling the same
US20130070908A1 (en) * 2010-06-01 2013-03-21 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Network testing
CN103647675A (en) * 2013-12-30 2014-03-19 中博信息技术研究院有限公司 Method for automatically optimizing quality of digital subscriber line (DSL) broadband
US20140198667A1 (en) * 2011-05-17 2014-07-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Measurement method
JP2015201146A (en) * 2014-04-10 2015-11-12 古河電気工業株式会社 System and program for optimizing position of joint
CN108417231A (en) * 2018-02-28 2018-08-17 四川斐讯信息技术有限公司 A kind of the line length detection method and system of DDR wirings
WO2021088735A1 (en) * 2019-11-04 2021-05-14 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Link detection method and apparatus, electronic device, and computer-readable medium
CN113162814A (en) * 2020-01-22 2021-07-23 厦门网宿有限公司 Method and system for generating network quality reference library and central server
CN113179103A (en) * 2021-03-26 2021-07-27 深圳市联洲国际技术有限公司 Method and device for optimizing receiving performance of communication system

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090252054A1 (en) * 2008-04-02 2009-10-08 Ozdal Barkan Reduced Power Transmission
CN101777935A (en) * 2009-01-12 2010-07-14 瑞昱半导体股份有限公司 Network communication device for improving connection quality and method thereof
CN101499822A (en) * 2009-03-04 2009-08-05 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Outputting power regulating system and method for terminal port on Ethernet switch
US20110243206A1 (en) * 2010-03-30 2011-10-06 Texas Instruments Incorporated Power back-off mode and circuit for 100baset
US20130070908A1 (en) * 2010-06-01 2013-03-21 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Network testing
US20140198667A1 (en) * 2011-05-17 2014-07-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Measurement method
US8190790B1 (en) * 2011-05-31 2012-05-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Storage apparatus and method of controlling the same
CN103647675A (en) * 2013-12-30 2014-03-19 中博信息技术研究院有限公司 Method for automatically optimizing quality of digital subscriber line (DSL) broadband
JP2015201146A (en) * 2014-04-10 2015-11-12 古河電気工業株式会社 System and program for optimizing position of joint
CN108417231A (en) * 2018-02-28 2018-08-17 四川斐讯信息技术有限公司 A kind of the line length detection method and system of DDR wirings
WO2021088735A1 (en) * 2019-11-04 2021-05-14 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Link detection method and apparatus, electronic device, and computer-readable medium
CN113162814A (en) * 2020-01-22 2021-07-23 厦门网宿有限公司 Method and system for generating network quality reference library and central server
CN113179103A (en) * 2021-03-26 2021-07-27 深圳市联洲国际技术有限公司 Method and device for optimizing receiving performance of communication system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN114006849B (en) 2023-09-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109462860B (en) Throughput optimization method and apparatus, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium
CN111327471B (en) Network quality analysis method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN108494602B (en) OTA parameter adjusting method and device and intelligent terminal
CN111984477B (en) PCIe equipment signal parameter dynamic correction device and method
CN111274153A (en) Automatic testing method and device and electronic equipment
CN113207146B (en) Wireless communication network quality monitoring system and method
CN114006849A (en) Wired connection network quality evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN110972311B (en) Bandwidth selection method, device and storage medium based on WLAN
CN111343647B (en) Method, apparatus, device and medium for user perception evaluation
US20230291829A1 (en) Systems, methods, and storage media for testing local loops of telecommunications networks
CN110381529B (en) WIFI hotspot testing method, control method, testing device and control system
CN117033278A (en) Data transmission method and system for multiple types of interfaces
CN114710801B (en) Processing method and device of evaluation parameters of network performance, storage medium and equipment
CN111464618A (en) Message pushing method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN116755024A (en) Method and device for testing electric energy meter communication interface and readable storage medium
CN109327852B (en) Cell quality calculation method, parameter configuration method and related equipment
CN115174437A (en) Network connection stability detection method and system
US7388906B2 (en) Method for detecting bridged taps on telephony cable
CN113079522A (en) OTT service quality testing method, OTT service quality testing device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN111026622B (en) Method and device for testing maximum service request quantity of tested system
CN117440427B (en) WiFi network networking quality diagnosis method, device and equipment
WO2021212385A1 (en) Data testing method and device, server, and data processing system
CN112214486B (en) Data storage method, system and device
CN117318847B (en) Frequency shifting device testing method, system, device and medium
CN114040511B (en) Communication device, OBO counter value method thereof, electronic device and storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant