CN113487392A - Enterprise evaluation method and device - Google Patents

Enterprise evaluation method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113487392A
CN113487392A CN202110854315.2A CN202110854315A CN113487392A CN 113487392 A CN113487392 A CN 113487392A CN 202110854315 A CN202110854315 A CN 202110854315A CN 113487392 A CN113487392 A CN 113487392A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
enterprise
evaluated
information
evaluation
industry
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110854315.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
不公告发明人
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chengdu Shulian Cloud Computing Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Chengdu Shulian Cloud Computing Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chengdu Shulian Cloud Computing Technology Co ltd filed Critical Chengdu Shulian Cloud Computing Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202110854315.2A priority Critical patent/CN113487392A/en
Publication of CN113487392A publication Critical patent/CN113487392A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08—Auctions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The embodiment of the application discloses an enterprise evaluation method and a device thereof, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring enterprise information of an enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated. The enterprise is evaluated through the bidding information of the enterprise, and the evaluation accuracy is improved.

Description

Enterprise evaluation method and device
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to an enterprise evaluation method and an enterprise evaluation device.
Background
With the development of science and technology, the division of labor in various industries in the society is more detailed at present, and various enterprises are developed in competition and cooperation. Therefore, how to scientifically and objectively seek enterprise partners or build enterprise ecological cooperation circles to enable the capabilities of the partners and the own enterprise capabilities to form a scale effect of advantage complementation and collaborative development is the problem that modern enterprises think the most.
Traditional enterprises are evaluated by expert experience when seeking partners or constructing an enterprise ecosphere. The method cannot ensure that the experts complete the evaluation at an objective angle, and the evaluation results of different experts may have differences and cannot be unified, so that the accuracy of the evaluation results is low.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application provides an enterprise evaluation method and device, and the enterprise is evaluated through bidding information of the enterprise, so that the accuracy of evaluation is improved.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an enterprise evaluation method, where the method includes: acquiring enterprise information of an enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
According to the technical scheme, the enterprise is evaluated through the bidding information of the enterprise, and the evaluation accuracy is improved.
In one implementation mode, the bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated in N industries, wherein N is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
In the technical scheme, bidding information of an enterprise to be evaluated in N industries and each industry is considered, so that data is more complete, and the objectivity and the accuracy of evaluation are never improved.
In one implementation manner, determining an evaluation result of an enterprise to be evaluated according to enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes: and aiming at each industry in the N industries, determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry.
In the technical scheme, if the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be used for representing the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated, the competitiveness of the enterprise in a certain industry can be evaluated through the scheme.
In one implementation manner, determining an evaluation result of an enterprise to be evaluated according to enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries and each industry.
In the technical scheme, if the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be used for representing the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated, the comprehensive competitiveness of the enterprise can be evaluated through the scheme.
In one implementation manner, determining an evaluation result of an enterprise to be evaluated according to bid and bid information of each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in N industries comprises: aiming at each industry in N industries, determining an evaluation result of an enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each industry and the corresponding weight of each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries.
In one implementation mode, the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated further comprises one or more non-bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated; determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the evaluation result comprises the following steps: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated and the weight corresponding to the bidding information and the weight corresponding to each non-bidding information in the one or more non-bidding information.
In the technical scheme, one or more non-bidding information is considered, so that the evaluation result is more comprehensive, objective and accurate.
In one implementation mode, the type and quantity of the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated are one or more; each enterprise information includes a first information value; determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the evaluation result comprises the following steps: for each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information, determining a second information value corresponding to the enterprise information according to an information value range to which a first information value included in the enterprise information belongs; the second information value is an information value corresponding to the information value range, and the information values corresponding to different information value ranges are different; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the second information value corresponding to each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information.
In the technical scheme, the second information value with small value difference can be obtained through conversion according to the first information value in different types of enterprise information, so that the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be determined according to the second information values corresponding to different types of enterprise information.
In one implementation, the number of enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the method further comprises the following steps: and outputting the evaluation value of each enterprise to be evaluated in the plurality of enterprises to be evaluated according to the high-low order of the evaluation values.
In the technical scheme, if the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be used for representing the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated, the comprehensive competitiveness ranking of the enterprise can be carried out through the scheme.
In one implementation, the number of enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the method further comprises the following steps: and aiming at each industry in the N industries, outputting the evaluation value of each to-be-evaluated enterprise in the industry according to the high-low order of the evaluation value in the industry.
In the technical scheme, if the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be used for representing the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated, the enterprise competitiveness can be ranked according to the industry through the scheme.
In one implementation, the bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes: and (4) the amount of the bid items and/or the amount of the bid items of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In one implementation, the one or more non-bidding information includes enterprise business data and/or enterprise loyalty data.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an enterprise rating apparatus, which includes means for performing the method of the first aspect.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an enterprise evaluation apparatus, where the enterprise evaluation apparatus includes a processor and a memory, and the processor and the memory are connected to each other, where the memory is used to store program instructions, and the processor is used to call the program instructions in the memory to execute the method of the first aspect.
In a fourth aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a computer-readable storage medium storing program instructions, which when executed by a processor, perform the method of the first aspect.
In the embodiment of the invention, the enterprise is evaluated according to the objective enterprise bidding information, which is beneficial to improving the accuracy of evaluation.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments are briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of an enterprise evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating another enterprise rating method provided by an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an enterprise evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of another enterprise evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, but not all, embodiments of the present application. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of an enterprise evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present application. The main execution units in steps S101 to S102 are electronic devices or chips in the electronic devices, and the electronic devices are described below as an example of the main execution units of the enterprise evaluation method.
The electronic device related in this embodiment may be a terminal device or a server, and the terminal device may also be referred to as a terminal (terminal), a User Equipment (UE), a Mobile Station (MS), a Mobile Terminal (MT), and the like. The terminal device may be a mobile phone (mobile phone), a wearable device, a smart television, a tablet computer (Pad), a computer with a wireless transceiving function, a Virtual Reality (VR) terminal device, an Augmented Reality (AR) terminal device, a wireless terminal in industrial control (industrial control), a wireless terminal in self-driving (self-driving), a wireless terminal in remote surgery (remote medical supply), a wireless terminal in smart grid (smart grid), a wireless terminal in transportation safety (transportation safety), a wireless terminal in smart city (smart city), a wireless terminal in smart home (smart home), and so on. The embodiment of the present application does not limit the specific technology and the specific device form adopted by the terminal device.
As shown in FIG. 1, the enterprise valuation method can include, but is not limited to, the following steps:
step S101: acquiring enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
The enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated is input into the electronic equipment by a user. Or the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated may be generated by the electronic device itself, that is, the electronic device may obtain the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated from a local area. Or the electronic device may acquire the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated from other devices (such as other terminal devices or other servers). For example, the information may be obtained from a server corresponding to a certain network. The number of the enterprises to be evaluated may be one or more. When the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple, the enterprise information of different enterprises to be evaluated may be obtained from the same device or from different devices, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present application.
The bid information for the business to be evaluated may include bid information and/or bid information. The bid information for the business to be evaluated may include one or more of: bidding information of an enterprise to be evaluated in N industries in each industry; the amount of the bid-winning item, the time of the bid/bid, the frequency of the bid/bid, the amount of the bid-winning item in a certain period of time (e.g., in the last year), the amount of the bid-winning item in a certain period of time, and the like of the enterprise to be evaluated. The number of winning bid items for each enterprise to be evaluated may be one or more. The number of winning bid items for each enterprise to be evaluated may be one or more. The amount of the bid items for each enterprise to be evaluated may be: the bid amount corresponding to each bid item may also be a total bid amount summarized by all bid items, which is not limited in the embodiments of the present application. The aforementioned N is an integer of 1 or more.
Step S102: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
After the electronic device acquires the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated, the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be determined according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated. The evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can represent the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated.
The enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated is objective, public and accurate information, and the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated, so that the accuracy of the evaluation result is improved. Therefore, enterprise decision-makers can be effectively helped to accurately seek partners, an enterprise ecological cooperation circle is constructed, the enterprise synergistic effect is played to the maximum extent, and the market share is occupied.
The enterprise evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the application can determine the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in a certain industry and can also determine the evaluation results of the enterprise to be evaluated in a plurality of industries. The enterprise evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the application can be used for evaluating the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated in a certain industry and can also be used for evaluating the comprehensive competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated. It is to be appreciated that the obtained business information for the business to be evaluated can include business information within one or more industries.
In one implementation, the electronic device may determine the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in a certain industry by: the specific implementation manner of determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated by the electronic device according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated may be: and aiming at each industry in the N industries, determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry.
In one implementation, the electronic device may determine the evaluation results of the enterprise to be evaluated in multiple industries by: the specific implementation manner of determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated by the electronic device according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated may be: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries and each industry. At this time, the evaluation results of the enterprises to be evaluated are determined jointly according to the bidding information of the N industries.
The specific implementation manner of determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bid and ask information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries and each industry may be as follows: aiming at each industry in N industries, determining an evaluation result of an enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each industry and the corresponding weight of each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries. For example, the result of weighted summation between the evaluation result and the weight of each industry in the N industries may be used as the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated. The weight corresponding to each industry can be set by the electronic equipment in a default mode or can be customized by a user, and the weight can be modified as required. The weights corresponding to different industries may be the same or different, and this is not limited in this application embodiment.
In one implementation mode, the number of the types of the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated can be one or more; each enterprise information includes a first information value; the specific implementation manner of determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated by the electronic device according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated may be: for each type of the one or more types of enterprise information, determining a second information value corresponding to the type of enterprise information according to an information value range to which a first information value included in the type of enterprise information belongs; the second information value is an information value corresponding to an information value range, and the information values corresponding to different information value ranges are different; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the second information value corresponding to each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information.
In this embodiment of the application, a plurality of information value ranges may be preset for each type of enterprise information, and the plurality of information value ranges may include a value size of a first information value included in the enterprise information that may be acquired in an actual situation. Therefore, the acquired first information value can be ensured to be within a certain information value range, and the corresponding second information value can be further determined. For example, taking the enterprise information as the amount of the winning bid item, and the amount of the winning bid item corresponds to 3 information value ranges and 3 second information values, the corresponding relationship between the information value ranges and the second information values may be as shown in table 1.
TABLE 1 correspondence between information value ranges and information value ranges
Information value range (winning bid item quantity) Second information value
(20,∞) 3
[10,20] 2
(0,10) 1
As can be seen from table 1, if the first information value in the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated is 11, the second information value corresponding to the enterprise information is 2. The evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be determined according to the second information values corresponding to the different types of enterprise information. For example, the difference between the first information values of the amount of the winning bid item and the amount of the winning bid item is large, the value of the amount of the winning bid item may be several tens of thousands, and the value of the second information value of the amount of the winning bid item and the amount of the winning bid item may be within 10.
In one implementation, the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated may include an evaluation value. The higher the evaluation value of the enterprise to be evaluated, the stronger the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated can be represented. By comparing the evaluation values, quantitative results can be provided for the users, and thus enterprises with strong competitiveness can be found quickly as partners. In one implementation, in a case where the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is plural, the electronic device may output the evaluation value of each of the plural enterprises to be evaluated in order of the high or low evaluation value. The comprehensive competitiveness of a plurality of enterprises can be sequenced, and enterprise users can more intuitively know which enterprises have stronger comprehensive competitiveness.
In one implementation, in a case that the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple, for each of the N industries, the electronic device may output the evaluation value of each of the enterprises to be evaluated in the industry in an order of high and low of the evaluation value in the industry. In other words, the comprehensive competitiveness of a plurality of enterprises can be sequenced in different industries, and enterprise users can more intuitively know which enterprises have stronger comprehensive competitiveness in a certain industry.
By implementing the embodiment of the application, the enterprise is evaluated through the bidding information of the enterprise, and the evaluation accuracy is improved.
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of another enterprise evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present application. The execution subject is an electronic device or a chip in the electronic device, and the electronic device is taken as an example of the execution subject of the enterprise evaluation method.
Step S201: acquiring enterprise information of an enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated and one or more non-bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
Wherein the one or more non-bidding information may include, but is not limited to: enterprise business data and/or enterprise loyalty data. The enterprise business data may include one or more of: the address location (such as the province) of the enterprise to be evaluated, the establishment date or the registered capital, and the like. The enterprise trustworthiness data may include one or more of: the information of losing credit, the information of keeping credit, the information of administrative penalty or the tax credit level of the enterprise to be evaluated and the like.
It should be noted that the rest of the content in step S201 may refer to the specific description in step S101 in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1, and is not described herein again.
Step S202: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated and the weight corresponding to the bidding information and the weight corresponding to each non-bidding information and each non-bidding information in the one or more non-bidding information.
Optionally, the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated, the weighted sum result between each type of non-bidding information and the corresponding weight may be used as the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In the embodiment of the application, the weights corresponding to the bidding information and various non-bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated can be set by default by the electronic device or can be defined by a user, and the weights can be modified as required. The weights corresponding to different non-bidding information may be the same or different, and this is not limited in this embodiment of the present application. Optionally, the weight corresponding to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated may be higher than the weight corresponding to the non-bidding information.
It should be noted that the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated is used for representing the competitiveness of the enterprise to be evaluated for example, and the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can be flexibly applied to enterprise analysis under multiple dimensions and multiple scenes, and is not limited to the competitive analysis. For example, the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated can also be used for evaluating the enterprise risk level of the enterprise to be evaluated. If the user wants the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated to be used for evaluating the enterprise risk level of the enterprise to be evaluated, the weight corresponding to the enterprise integrity data of the enterprise to be evaluated can be higher than the weight corresponding to other non-bidding information and can also be higher than the weight corresponding to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
It should be noted that the enterprise evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application may be implemented by a mathematical model, and various parameters (for example, the mentioned weights, the second information values, the correspondence between the information value ranges and the second information values, and the like) in the embodiment of the present application may be obtained by training the model.
By way of example, how to determine the weights in the model and how to determine the evaluation values of the business to be evaluated will be described below by taking the example that the non-bidding information includes business data and business integrity data:
A. comprehensive evaluation
The calculation formula of the evaluation value of the enterprise to be evaluated is as follows: sn ═ Gn + Zn + Cn
Wherein, Sn represents the comprehensive evaluation value of the nth enterprise, and Gn, Zn and Cn represent evaluation values of the enterprise in 3 dimensions of enterprise business data, bid and bid information and enterprise integrity data, respectively. 1< ═ n < Y, Y is the number of enterprises to be evaluated, and Y > -1.
Zn1+ Zn 2. Zn1 represents an evaluation value corresponding to the amount of the bid winning items of the nth enterprise; zn2 represents an evaluation value corresponding to the amount of the winning bid item for the nth business. Illustratively, the bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated corresponds to a weight of 50%. Wherein, the weight of the amount of the winning bid items and the amount of the winning bid items is 25 percent.
Figure BDA0003182378970000091
Wherein Qn is the bid price of the nth enterpriseNumber of items, QmaxFor the largest winning bid item quantity, Q, of the enterpriseminThe minimum bid amount for the enterprise.
Figure BDA0003182378970000092
Wherein Mn is the sum of the bid items of the nth enterprise, MmaxFor the maximum bid amount of the winning bid item, MminThe minimum amount of the bid items for the enterprise.
B. Industry-wide assessment
The calculation formula of the evaluation value of the enterprise to be evaluated in the ith industry is as follows: sni Gn + Zni + Cn
Sni represents the evaluation value of the nth enterprise in the ith industry, and Gn, Zni and Cn represent the evaluation values of the enterprise in 3 dimensions of enterprise business data, bid and bid information of the ith industry and enterprise integrity data respectively. 1< ═ i < the aforementioned N, N being the total number of industries.
Zni ═ Zni1+ Zni 2. Zni1 represents the evaluation value corresponding to the amount of winning bid items of the nth enterprise in the ith industry; zni2 represents the evaluation value corresponding to the amount of the bid item in the ith industry for the nth enterprise. And the weight corresponding to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated is 50%. Wherein, the weight of the amount of the winning bid items and the amount of the winning bid items is 25 percent.
Figure BDA0003182378970000093
Qni represents the winning bid item quantity of the nth enterprise in the ith industry, QimaxThe largest bid amount, Q, for the enterprise in the ith industryiminThe minimum bid amount for the enterprise in the ith industry.
Figure BDA0003182378970000094
Where Mni is the amount of the item bid by the nth enterprise in the ith industry, MimaxFor the largest winning bid item amount of the enterprise in the ith industry, MiminThe minimum amount of the bid items for the enterprise in the ith industry.
Illustratively, the business data of the business to be evaluated corresponds to a weight of 25%. The weights of the region, the established date and the registered capital are 5%, 10% and 10%, respectively.
Gn＝G1+G2+G3
Wherein, G1, G2, G3 represent the evaluation values corresponding to the area where the business is located, the established date and the registered capital, respectively. For the region: factors of the enterprise territory can influence whether to cooperate and communicate with the enterprise. For example, the weights may be divided according to whether the enterprise to be evaluated and the enterprise corresponding to the user are in the same province. For example, in the same province, the corresponding weight is 5%; in different provinces, the corresponding weight is 3%. And the corresponding established date: illustratively, the weight division is performed at 3-year and 5-year separation periods. For example, the duration of the establishment is more than 5 years, and the corresponding weight is 10%; the establishment duration is 3 to 5 years (including 3 years and 5 years), corresponding to a weight of 5%; the length of establishment was 3 years or less, corresponding to a weight of 2%. Corresponding to the registered capital: and dividing different registered capital intervals for weight design. For example, the registered capital is above 5 million, corresponding to a weight of 10%; the registered capital is in the interval of 1 million to 5 million (including boundary values), and the corresponding weight is 5%; the capital registered is under 1 million, corresponding to a weight of 2%.
Illustratively, the enterprise trustworthiness data for the enterprise to be rated corresponds to a weight of 25%. The weight of the administrative punishment, the loss of credit and the tax credit level is respectively 10%, 10% and 5%.
Cn＝C1+C2+C3
Wherein, C1, C2 and C3 represent the evaluation values corresponding to the administrative penalty, the loss of credit and the tax credit level of the enterprise respectively. It is understood that, if the larger the evaluation value is, the stronger the competitiveness is, the larger the number of administrative penalties is, the smaller the corresponding evaluation value is. Similarly, if the larger the evaluation value is, the stronger the competitiveness is, the larger the number of lost messages is, the smaller the corresponding evaluation value is. The corresponding evaluation value may be a negative number.
By implementing the embodiment of the application, the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated is determined according to the bidding information and each non-bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated, so that the evaluation result is more comprehensive, objective and accurate.
The method of embodiments of the present invention is described above and the apparatus of embodiments of the present invention is further described below.
Fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an enterprise evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. The enterprise rating apparatus 300 includes a processing unit 301.
The processing unit 301 is configured to acquire enterprise information of an enterprise to be evaluated, where the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes bid and bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated;
the processing unit 301 is further configured to determine an evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In one implementation manner, the bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes bid information of each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in N industries, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
In one implementation, the processing unit 301 is further configured to determine, for each industry of the N industries, an evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to bid and bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry.
In one implementation, the processing unit 301 is further configured to determine an evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to bid and bid information of each of the N industries of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In one implementation, the processing unit 301 is further configured to determine, for each industry of the N industries, an evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to bid and bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each industry and the weight corresponding to each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries.
In one implementation, the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated further includes one or more non-bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated; the processing unit 301 is further configured to determine an evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated and the weight corresponding to the bidding information, and according to each type of non-bidding information and the weight corresponding to each type of non-bidding information in the one or more types of non-bidding information.
In one implementation mode, the category number of the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated is one or more; each enterprise information includes a first information value; the processing unit 301 is further configured to determine, for each piece of enterprise information in the one or more pieces of enterprise information, a second information value corresponding to the piece of enterprise information according to an information value range to which a first information value included in the piece of enterprise information belongs; the second information value is an information value corresponding to the information value range, and the information values corresponding to different information value ranges are different; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the second information value corresponding to each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information.
In one implementation, the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the enterprise evaluation apparatus further includes an output unit 302 configured to output an evaluation value of each of the plurality of enterprises to be evaluated in an order of high and low of the evaluation values.
In one implementation, the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the enterprise evaluation device further includes an output unit 302, configured to output, for each industry within the N industries, an evaluation value of each enterprise to be evaluated in the industry in the order of the evaluation values in the industry.
In one implementation, the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes: the amount of the winning bid items and/or the amount of the winning bid items of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In one implementation, the one or more types of non-bidding information includes business and business integrity data.
It should be noted that, the implementation of each operation may also correspond to the corresponding description of the method embodiments shown in fig. 1 to fig. 2.
Fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of another enterprise evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. The enterprise evaluation device in the present embodiment shown in fig. 4 may include: one or more processors 401 and memory 402. The processor 401 and the memory 402 are connected by a bus 403. The memory 402 is used to store instructions. The Processor 401 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), and may also be other general purpose processors, Digital Signal Processors (DSP), Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC), Field-Programmable Gate arrays (FPGA) or other Programmable logic devices, discrete Gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.
The memory 402 may include both read-only memory and random access memory, and provides instructions and data to the processor 401. A portion of the memory 402 may also include non-volatile random access memory. For example, the memory 402 may also store device type information.
Processor 401 is operative to execute program instructions stored in memory 402 to perform the following operations:
acquiring enterprise information of an enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated;
and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In one implementation, the bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes bid information of each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated within N industries, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
In one implementation, processor 401 is further configured to perform the following operations: and aiming at each industry in the N industries, determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry.
In one implementation, processor 401 is further configured to perform the following operations: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries and each industry.
In one implementation, processor 401 is further configured to perform the following operations: aiming at each industry in the N industries, determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each industry and the corresponding weight of each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries.
In one implementation, the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated further includes one or more non-bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated; processor 401 is also configured to perform the following operations: and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated and the weight corresponding to the bidding information and the weight corresponding to each type of non-bidding information and each type of non-bidding information in the one or more types of non-bidding information.
In one implementation mode, the category number of the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated is one or more; each enterprise information includes a first information value; processor 401 is also configured to perform the following operations: for each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information, determining a second information value corresponding to the enterprise information according to an information value range to which a first information value included in the enterprise information belongs; the second information value is an information value corresponding to the information value range, and the information values corresponding to different information value ranges are different; and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the second information value corresponding to each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information.
In one implementation, the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the enterprise evaluation apparatus may further include an output device 404, and the processor 401 is further configured to invoke the output device 404 to output the evaluation value of each enterprise to be evaluated in the plurality of enterprises to be evaluated in the order of the evaluation values.
In one implementation, the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the enterprise evaluation apparatus may further include an output device 404, and the processor 401 is further configured to invoke the output device 404 to output, for each industry of the N industries, an evaluation value of each enterprise to be evaluated in the industry in the order of high and low evaluation values of the industry.
In one implementation, the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated includes: the amount of the winning bid items and/or the amount of the winning bid items of the enterprise to be evaluated.
In one implementation, the one or more types of non-bidding information includes business and business integrity data.
It should be noted that, the implementation of each operation may also correspond to the corresponding description of the method embodiments shown in fig. 1 to fig. 2.
In a further embodiment of the invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, which stores a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of the embodiment shown in fig. 1-2.
The computer readable storage medium may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device in any of the foregoing embodiments, for example, a hard disk or a memory of the electronic device. The computer readable storage medium may also be an external storage device of the electronic device, such as a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), and the like provided on the electronic device. Further, the computer readable storage medium may also include both an internal storage unit and an external storage device of the electronic device. The computer-readable storage medium is used for storing the computer program and other programs and data required by the electronic device. The computer readable storage medium may also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is to be output.
In another embodiment of the invention, a computer program product is provided, which when run on a processor implements the method of the embodiment shown in fig. 1-2.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the elements and algorithm steps of the examples described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied in electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both, and that the components and steps of the examples have been described in a functional general in the foregoing description for the purpose of illustrating clearly the interchangeability of hardware and software. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
It can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the terminal and the unit described above may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
In the embodiments provided in the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed terminal and method can be implemented in other manners. For example, the above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the unit is only one logical functional division, and other divisions may be realized in practice, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may also be an electric, mechanical or other form of connection.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment of the present invention.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention essentially contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (14)

1. An enterprise evaluation method, comprising:
acquiring enterprise information of an enterprise to be evaluated, wherein the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated;
and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated.
2. The enterprise evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the bid information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises bid information of each of N industries within which the enterprise to be evaluated is located, wherein N is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises:
and aiming at each industry in the N industries, determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry.
4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises:
and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries and each industry.
5. The enterprise valuation method of claim 4,
the determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries and each industry comprises the following steps:
aiming at each industry in the N industries, determining an evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry according to bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry;
and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each industry and the weight corresponding to each industry of the enterprise to be evaluated in the N industries.
6. The business evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the business information of the business to be evaluated further comprises one or more non-bidding information of the business to be evaluated;
the determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises the following steps:
and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated and the weight corresponding to the bidding information, and according to each type of non-bidding information and the weight corresponding to each type of non-bidding information in the one or more types of non-bidding information.
7. The enterprise evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the number of the types of the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated is one or more; each enterprise information includes a first information value;
the determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the enterprise information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises the following steps:
for each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information, determining a second information value corresponding to the enterprise information according to an information value range to which a first information value included in the enterprise information belongs; the second information value is an information value corresponding to the information value range, and the information values corresponding to different information value ranges are different;
and determining the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the second information value corresponding to each enterprise information in the one or more enterprise information.
8. The enterprise evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the method further comprises the following steps:
and outputting the evaluation value of each enterprise to be evaluated in the plurality of enterprises to be evaluated according to the high-low order of the evaluation values.
9. The enterprise evaluation method according to any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein the number of the enterprises to be evaluated is multiple; the evaluation result of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises an evaluation value; the method further comprises the following steps:
and outputting the evaluation value of each to-be-evaluated enterprise in the industries according to the high-low sequence of the evaluation values in the industries aiming at each industry in the N industries.
10. The enterprise evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the bidding information of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises: and the amount of the bid items and/or the amount of the bid items of the enterprise to be evaluated.
11. The enterprise evaluation method of claim 6, wherein the one or more types of non-bidding information comprises enterprise business data and/or enterprise loyalty data.
12. An enterprise rating apparatus comprising means for performing the enterprise rating method of any of claims 1-11.
13. An enterprise rating device comprising a processor and a memory, the memory having stored therein program instructions, the processor executing the program instructions stored in the memory to cause the device to perform the enterprise rating method of any of claims 1-11.
14. A computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed, cause the enterprise valuation method of any of claims 1-11 to be performed.
CN202110854315.2A 2021-07-27 2021-07-27 Enterprise evaluation method and device Pending CN113487392A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110854315.2A CN113487392A (en) 2021-07-27 2021-07-27 Enterprise evaluation method and device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110854315.2A CN113487392A (en) 2021-07-27 2021-07-27 Enterprise evaluation method and device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113487392A true CN113487392A (en) 2021-10-08

Family

ID=77943048

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110854315.2A Pending CN113487392A (en) 2021-07-27 2021-07-27 Enterprise evaluation method and device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113487392A (en)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106228310A (en) * 2016-08-02 2016-12-14 西南石油大学 A kind of Enterprise Integrated assessment method based on enterprise's basic act track and system
CN106355471A (en) * 2016-08-31 2017-01-25 天津京东智联科技发展有限公司 Bidding data processing method and system
CN106910025A (en) * 2017-03-03 2017-06-30 深圳市博信诺达经贸咨询有限公司 The method and system of big data valuation of enterprise
CN108985600A (en) * 2018-07-03 2018-12-11 龙马智芯（珠海横琴）科技有限公司 Analysis method, computer readable storage medium and the analytical equipment of enterprise competitiveness
CN112700313A (en) * 2020-12-08 2021-04-23 企查查科技有限公司 Bidding information analysis method, equipment and storage device
CN112767117A (en) * 2020-12-30 2021-05-07 北京知因智慧科技有限公司 Method and device for evaluating enterprise status in group
CN113011899A (en) * 2021-02-10 2021-06-22 北京信息科技大学 Enterprise credit evaluation method, device, equipment and computer storage medium

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106228310A (en) * 2016-08-02 2016-12-14 西南石油大学 A kind of Enterprise Integrated assessment method based on enterprise's basic act track and system
CN106355471A (en) * 2016-08-31 2017-01-25 天津京东智联科技发展有限公司 Bidding data processing method and system
CN106910025A (en) * 2017-03-03 2017-06-30 深圳市博信诺达经贸咨询有限公司 The method and system of big data valuation of enterprise
CN108985600A (en) * 2018-07-03 2018-12-11 龙马智芯（珠海横琴）科技有限公司 Analysis method, computer readable storage medium and the analytical equipment of enterprise competitiveness
CN112700313A (en) * 2020-12-08 2021-04-23 企查查科技有限公司 Bidding information analysis method, equipment and storage device
CN112767117A (en) * 2020-12-30 2021-05-07 北京知因智慧科技有限公司 Method and device for evaluating enterprise status in group
CN113011899A (en) * 2021-02-10 2021-06-22 北京信息科技大学 Enterprise credit evaluation method, device, equipment and computer storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108833458B (en) Application recommendation method, device, medium and equipment
TWI743428B (en) Method and device for determining target user group
CN108537289B (en) Training method and device of data recognition model and storage medium
CN107369091B (en) Product recommendation method and device and financial product recommendation method
CN109345108A (en) Method for allocating tasks, device, equipment and storage medium
CN110264156B (en) Project management method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN108711067A (en) Choosing method, terminal device and the medium of electricity pin period
CN111930366B (en) Rule engine implementation method and system based on JIT real-time compilation
CN106302579A (en) The distribution method of a kind of task and server
CN110046805A (en) Risk subscribers find method and device
CN112036631B (en) Purchasing quantity determining method, purchasing quantity determining device, purchasing quantity determining equipment and storage medium
CN112650921A (en) Object recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN108667877B (en) Method and device for determining recommendation information, computer equipment and storage medium
CN111091245A (en) Method and device for determining participation in ordered energy utilization enterprises
CN107067276A (en) Determine the method and device of object influences power
CN109472312A (en) Application assessment method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium
US20130013244A1 (en) Pattern based test prioritization using weight factors
CN108961071B (en) Method for automatically predicting combined service income and terminal equipment
CN113487392A (en) Enterprise evaluation method and device
CN113038242B (en) Method, device and equipment for determining display position of live broadcast card and storage medium
CN110968547A (en) Information screening method and system
CN115309876A (en) Method and device for calculating recommendation degree of awakening word, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN114201696A (en) Message pushing method and device, storage medium and computer equipment
CN113822704A (en) Method and device for calculating discount cost, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
CN113837368A (en) Control method and device for evaluating data value of each participant in federal learning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination