CN113351982B - Test debugging method of ultrasonic wire harness welding machine - Google Patents
Test debugging method of ultrasonic wire harness welding machine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113351982B CN113351982B CN202110916225.1A CN202110916225A CN113351982B CN 113351982 B CN113351982 B CN 113351982B CN 202110916225 A CN202110916225 A CN 202110916225A CN 113351982 B CN113351982 B CN 113351982B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- debugging
- factors
- parameter
- factor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K20/00—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating
- B23K20/10—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating making use of vibrations, e.g. ultrasonic welding
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Pressure Welding/Diffusion-Bonding (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, which comprises the following steps: acquiring a uniform distribution table and test debugging factors of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine; constructing a test debugging model according to the uniform distribution table and the test debugging factors; obtaining a middle coefficient and a sensitivity coefficient of a test debugging factor according to the test debugging model; obtaining a target function and constraint conditions of test debugging factors according to the test debugging model; and testing and debugging the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition. The invention can comprehensively consider the test debugging factors and can measure the influence of each test debugging factor through the intermediate coefficient and the sensitivity coefficient, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the test debugging result, being convenient for operation and having strong universality.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of welding machine debugging, in particular to a test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine.
Background
The test debugging of the factor group of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine belongs to the category of engineering experiment design, and the main aim of the test debugging is to ensure that the input parameters and the uncontrollable errors of all factors are the maximum in the joint strength formed by the welding process overlapped with each other at a test point on the premise of ensuring the factor number and the horizontal number, so that the test efficiency of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine is maximized and the test debugging is standardized.
However, in the existing factor group test debugging scheme of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, the model is simple, the number of considered factors is not comprehensive enough, and the scheme generally only changes one factor at a time, so that the accuracy of the result is difficult to ensure.
Disclosure of Invention
The present invention is directed to solving, at least to some extent, one of the technical problems in the art described above. Therefore, the invention aims to provide a test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, which can comprehensively consider test debugging factors and can measure the influence of each test debugging factor through a middle coefficient and a sensitive coefficient, thereby ensuring the accuracy of a test debugging result, being convenient to operate and having strong universality.
In order to achieve the purpose, the embodiment of the invention provides a test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, which comprises the following steps: acquiring a uniform distribution table and test debugging factors of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine; constructing a test debugging model according to the uniform distribution table and the test debugging factors; obtaining a middle coefficient and a sensitivity coefficient of the test debugging factor according to the test debugging model; obtaining a target function and constraint conditions of the test debugging factors according to the test debugging model; and testing and debugging the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition.
According to the test debugging method of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, provided by the embodiment of the invention, the test debugging model is built according to the uniform distribution table and the test debugging factors, the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition of the test debugging factors are obtained according to the test debugging model, and the test debugging is carried out on the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition, so that the test debugging factors can be considered comprehensively, the influence of each test debugging factor can be measured through the intermediate coefficient and the sensitivity coefficient, the accuracy of the test debugging result can be ensured, the operation is convenient, and the universality is strong.
In addition, the test debugging method for the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine provided by the embodiment of the invention can also have the following additional technical characteristics:
according to one embodiment of the invention, the trial tuning factors include weld amplitude, weld pressure, weld time, horn area, tooth depth and joint cross-sectional area.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the uniform distribution table is
。
According to one embodiment of the invention, the test debugging model is a test point parameter distribution model of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, and comprises an inherent deviation process, a high-order error line and a difference parameter of the test point, a response process of the test debugging factor at the test point, and a parameter of the test debugging factor in a debugging parameter starting and stopping sequence in the response process of the test debugging factor at the test point.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the difference parameter of the test point is an amount of the test point exceeding the high-order error line, and the specific expression is:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is a difference parameter of the test point,min order to test the number of factors,S i ’(d) Is as followsiThe response process of each test debugging factor at the test point,
in the form of a high-order error line,din order to have a long interval, the interval is long,
in order to be the amount of variation in the interval length,
is a horizontal parameter interval.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the response process of the trial debugging factor at the trial point is a parameter within a debugging parameter start-stop order, and the specific expression is:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,H iis as followsiThe response process of each test debugging factor at the test point is positioned in the parameter within the debugging parameter starting and stopping sequence,nand debugging the horizontal number for the test of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the intermediate coefficient is calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe intermediate coefficients of the individual trial tuning factors,pis the number of factors during the test period,
to include the sum of the squared residuals of the p factors,
fitting standard deviation containing m factors;
the sensitivity coefficient is calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe sensitivity coefficient of each test debugging factor,p-kfor the number of trial debug factors during trial debug,kin order to have a low number of sensitivities,
the number of crossovers is.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the objective function expression is:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,Min S i is as followsiAn objective function of the individual trial tuning factors,Din order to adjust the number of steps in the debugging period,p-kfor the number of trial debug factors during trial debug,
test 1 factors were adjustedp-kThe sum of the response processes of the parameters of the test debugging factors at the test point,S i(d) And the response process of the parameter of the output of the ith test debugging factor at the test point.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the constraint condition comprises an error balance constraint, a maximum parameter level constraint of the trial debugging factors, a parameter level constraint of the trial debugging factors at the end of a trial debugging period, and an allowable amplitude constraint of the trial debugging factor output.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the test debugging of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition comprises the following steps: respectively determining the factor number of the test debugging factors and the debugging sequence of the test debugging factors according to the intermediate coefficient and the sensitivity coefficient; and calculating the optimal solution of the target function by adopting a global control grouping algorithm according to the debugging sequence, the factor number and the constraint condition so as to obtain a test debugging result of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a test commissioning method of an ultrasonic wire harness welder in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a plot of a test point parameter profile for an ultrasonic beam welder, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a global control packet algorithm according to one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a global control packet algorithm according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to an embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the test debugging method of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the embodiment of the present invention includes the following steps:
and S1, acquiring the uniform distribution table and test debugging factors of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the trial and error factors may include welding amplitude, welding pressure, welding time, welding head area, tooth depth and joint cross-sectional area, and the uniform distribution table may be
。
S2, constructing a test debugging model according to the uniform distribution table and the test debugging factors;
in one embodiment of the invention, the table may be uniformly distributed
Randomly extracting test debugging factors, namely welding amplitude, welding pressure, welding time, welding head area, welding tooth depth and joint sectional area, to construct a test debugging model. As shown in fig. 2, the test debugging model is a test point parameter distribution model of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, and may specifically include an inherent deviation process, a high-order error line, a difference parameter of the test point, a response process of the test debugging factor at the test point, and a parameter in which the response process of the test debugging factor at the test point is within a debugging parameter start-stop order.
In particular, as shown in figure 2,S(d) Can indicate the test pointThe process of the inherent deviation of (a) is,S ε a high order error line for the trial point may be represented,H cea difference parameter may be represented for the test point,S i ’(d) Can represent the firstiThe response process of each test debugging factor at the test point,d i 、d i+1 can represent the starting and stopping sequence of debugging parameters,H ican representS i ’(d) Is located ind i，d i+1]The parameter (c) of (d).
More specifically, the present invention is to provide a novel,H cethat is, the difference parameter of the test point may be the amount by which the test point exceeds the high order error line, and the expression may be:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is a difference parameter of the test point,min order to test the number of factors,
in the form of a high-order error line,din order to have a long interval, the interval is long,
in order to be the amount of variation in the interval length,
is a horizontal parameter interval.
More specifically, the present invention is to provide a novel,H ii.e. byS i ’(d) Is located ind i，d i+1]The expression of the parameter(s) of (c) may be:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,ntest debugging level number for ultrasonic wire harness welding machine。
It should be noted that, in the following description,H ii.e. byS i ’(d) Is located ind i，d i+1]The parameters of (1) take into account the generation of overall errors and can reflect the distribution difference of test debugging factors, wherein, if the parameters are generated
If so, the strength of each test debugging factor can be controlled in the factor allowable range by utilizing the available debugging range of the test debugging factor; if it is
It indicates that the uncontrollable model error has a certain influence on the intensity.
In one embodiment of the present invention, test tuning factors, i.e., weld amplitude, weld pressure, weld time, weld head area, weld tooth depth, and joint cross-sectional area pairs, can be usedH ceI.e. the difference parameter of the test point.
In addition, it should be noted that design parameters are also required for trial and error factors. Specifically, for the secondiFor each trial debugging factor, the available debugging range at the current parameter level can be set asL i The subsequent adjustment amount ish i The factor control coefficient isc i Then the subsequently adjusted input level changes to
Furthermore, in consideration of observation errors, a debugging range needs to be reserved
And reserve debug scope
The following formula can be used for calculation:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe adjustment parameters of the test debugging factors during the test debugging.
In addition, for the secondiFor each test debugging factor, the first one can be setiThe design parameters of the horizontal distribution of the test debugging factors are
And can be calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,nthe test debugging level number of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine,L i，max the maximum debug range available at the current parameter level,L i，min the minimum debugging range available at the current parameter level.
First, theiAverage design parameter of individual test debugging factor
Can be calculated by the following formula:
first, theiThe distribution coefficient of the horizontal actual design parameters of the individual trial tuning factors can be calculated by the following formula:
first, theiThe horizontal actual design parameters of the individual trial tuning factors can be calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
。
and S3, obtaining the intermediate coefficient and the sensitivity coefficient of the test debugging factor according to the test debugging model.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the intermediate coefficient may be calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe intermediate coefficients of the individual trial tuning factors,pis the number of factors during the test period,
to comprisepThe sum of the squared residuals of the individual factors,
to comprisemThe standard deviation of the fit for each of the factors,mthe factor number was adjusted for the test.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the sensitivity factor may be calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe sensitivity coefficient of each test debugging factor,p-kfor the number of trial debug factors during trial debug,kin order to have a low number of sensitivities,
the number of crossovers is.
And S4, obtaining the target function and the constraint condition of the test debugging factor according to the test debugging model.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the objective function may be calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,Min S i is as followsiAn objective function of the individual trial tuning factors,Din order to adjust the number of steps in the debugging period,p-kfor the number of trial debug factors during trial debug,
test 1 factors were adjustedp-kThe sum of the response processes of the parameters of the test debugging factors at the test point.
In one embodiment of the invention, the constraints may include error balance constraints, maximum parametric level constraints for trial debug factors, parametric level constraints for trial debug factors at the end of a trial debug period, trial debug factor output allowable magnitude constraints.
Specifically, the error balance constraint isiTest debugging factors are given inDThe specific expression of the constraint parameters output by the steps is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiTest debugging factors are given inDThe parameters to be input in the beginning of the step,
is as followsiTest debugging factors are given inDThe parameters of the calculation are started in steps,
debugging the factor for the ith testStep 1 to stepDAverage parameters of the response course of the step at the test point.
Specifically, the expression of the highest parametric level constraint for the trial debug factors is:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe highest parametric level constraints of the trial tuning factors,
is as followsiTest debugging factor IdThe level of the sub-parameter is,
is as followsiThe start-up parameter level of the trial tuning factors,
to test the parameter levels of the tuning factors,
is as followsiAnd testing the level of the debugging factor to actually design parameters.
Specifically, the expression of the parameter level constraint of the trial debugging factor at the end of the trial debugging period is:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe trial debug factors are constrained at the parameter level at the end of the debug period,
is as followsiTest debugging factor allowance control at the end of debugging periodParameter level constraints are made.
In particular, trial debug factor output allows amplitude constraints
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe amplitude of the adjacent secondary parameters of the test debugging factors,
is as followsiAnd testing the allowable parameter amplitude of the debugging factor.
And S5, testing and debugging the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition.
Specifically, the factor number of the test debugging factors and the debugging sequence of the test debugging factors are respectively determined according to the intermediate coefficients and the sensitive coefficients, and the optimal solution of the target function can be calculated by adopting a global control grouping algorithm according to the debugging sequence, the factor number and the constraint conditions, so as to obtain the test debugging result of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine. The number of the test debugging factors can be determined according to the size of each intermediate coefficient, and the debugging sequence of the test debugging factors can be determined from high to low according to the sequence of each sensitive coefficient.
More specifically, the global control grouping algorithm shown in fig. 3 may be adopted, and a local optimal solution, that is, an optimal test debugging method, may be obtained by gradually introducing constraint conditions, that is, gradually introducing an error balance constraint, a maximum parameter level constraint of the test debugging factors, a parameter level constraint of the test debugging factors at the end of the test debugging period, and a test debugging factor output allowable amplitude constraint to solve the objective function. As shown in fig. 3, the global control packet algorithm includes the following steps:
s501, solving an objective function according to constraint conditions, namely error balance constraint, maximum parameter level constraint of test debugging factors, parameter level constraint of the test debugging factors at the end of a test debugging period, and output allowable amplitude constraint of the test debugging factors to obtain an initial expected optimal solution;
s502, further carrying out test debugging calculation according to error balance constraint, checking the output allowable amplitude constraint of test debugging factors, if the constraint condition is met, executing the step S503, otherwise, correcting parameters and executing the step S502 again;
s503, further checking the highest parameter level constraint of the test debugging factors, if the constraint condition is met, executing the step S504, otherwise, modifying the parameters and transferring to the step S502;
s504, further checking the lowest parameter level constraint of the test debugging factors at the end of the test debugging period, if the constraint condition is met, outputting the calculation result, and if the constraint condition is not met, modifying the parameters and transferring to the step S502.
More specifically, as shown in fig. 4, the global control packet algorithm includes the following steps:
s01, inputting basic data (t, b, a) and preset information (S1, h1, Sj), wherein a is welding amplitude, b is welding pressure, t is welding time, S1 is welding head area, h1 is welding tooth depth, and Sj is joint sectional area;
s02, initial conditions and control conditions are determined, wherein,nthe test debugging horizontal number of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine,mThe MSE is the mean square error;
s03, calculating the parameter distribution of the test points;
s04, IO =1, M = M, entering a debugging mode, calling 1, namely, the overall fitting program segment executes the step S05, wherein IO is an interface state, and M is a variable assignment;
s05, testing, debugging and calculating;
s06, returning to 1, namely returning to call 1 to use the overall fitting parameters, specifically regression parameters, as the basis for determining the intermediate coefficients and the corresponding factor groups; and return 2, i.e. return the parameters for calculating the intermediate coefficients;
s07, for the process of calculating a plurality of subsets and parameters formed by integral fitting, judging whether all the subsets are traversed or intermediate coefficient conditions are met, if so, executing a step S08, and if not, executing a step S12;
s08, for the intermediate result formed in the S07 process and the parameter calculation process, judging whether the sensitivity condition is met or all subsets are traversed, if yes, executing the step S09, if not, executing the step S10, and returning to 3, namely returning to calculate the parameter of the sensitivity coefficient;
s09, outputting a test debugging result;
s10, adjusting the parameters of [ d-1, d +1 ];
s11, IO = p, M = p-k, entering a debugging mode, calling 3, namely calculating the sensitivity coefficient, and returning to the step S05;
s12, calculatingmI.e. number of test factors;
s13, adjusting the factor combination;
s14, IO =1, M = p, enters the debug mode, calls 2, i.e., calculates the intermediate coefficients, and returns to step S05.
It should be noted that the error balance in step S502 is a sum of squares of residuals obtained after traversing all subsets, that is, the SSE is fluctuating, the fluctuation range is the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval in the parameter interval, and the evaluation conditions are specifically the intermediate coefficient and the sensitive coefficient. Wherein, the highest parameter in step S503 is a parameter before adjustment, and the specific range is not greater than the upper limit of the confidence interval of the parameter before adjustment; the lowest parameter in step S504 is the adjusted parameter, and the specific range is not less than the lower limit of the confidence interval of the adjusted parameter.
According to the test debugging method of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine, provided by the embodiment of the invention, the test debugging model is built according to the uniform distribution table and the test debugging factors, the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition of the test debugging factors are obtained according to the test debugging model, and the test debugging is carried out on the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition, so that the test debugging factors can be considered comprehensively, the influence of each test debugging factor can be measured through the intermediate coefficient and the sensitivity coefficient, the accuracy of the test debugging result can be ensured, the operation is convenient, and the universality is strong.
In the description of the present invention, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implying any number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. The meaning of "plurality" is two or more unless specifically limited otherwise.
In the present invention, unless otherwise expressly stated or limited, the terms "mounted," "connected," "secured," and the like are to be construed broadly and can, for example, be fixedly connected, detachably connected, or integrally formed; can be mechanically or electrically connected; either directly or indirectly through intervening media, either internally or in any other relationship. The specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood by those skilled in the art according to specific situations.
In the present invention, unless otherwise expressly stated or limited, the first feature "on" or "under" the second feature may be directly contacting the first and second features or indirectly contacting the first and second features through an intermediate. Also, a first feature "on," "over," and "above" a second feature may be directly or diagonally above the second feature, or may simply indicate that the first feature is at a higher level than the second feature. A first feature being "under," "below," and "beneath" a second feature may be directly under or obliquely under the first feature, or may simply mean that the first feature is at a lesser elevation than the second feature.
In the description herein, references to the description of the term "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "an example," "a specific example," or "some examples," etc., mean that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the invention. In this specification, the schematic representations of the terms used above are not necessarily intended to refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples. Furthermore, various embodiments or examples and features of different embodiments or examples described in this specification can be combined and combined by one skilled in the art without contradiction.
Claims (5)
1. A test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welding machine is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring test debugging factors of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine and an even distribution table of the test debugging factors, wherein the even distribution table is
The test debugging factors comprise welding amplitude, welding pressure, welding time, welding head area, welding tooth depth and joint sectional area;
constructing a test debugging model according to the uniform distribution table and the test debugging factors, specifically, randomly extracting the test debugging factors from the uniform distribution table to construct the test debugging model, wherein the test debugging model is a test point parameter distribution model of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine;
obtaining a middle coefficient and a sensitivity coefficient of the test debugging factor according to the test debugging model, specifically, calculating the middle coefficient by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe intermediate coefficients of the individual trial tuning factors,pis the number of factors during the test period,
to comprisepResidual error of each factorSum of squares of
IncludedmThe standard deviation of the fit for each of the factors,
the sensitivity coefficient is calculated by the following formula:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe sensitivity coefficient of each test debugging factor,p-kfor the number of trial debug factors during trial debug,kin order to have a low number of sensitivities,
the number of crossovers;
obtaining an objective function and constraint conditions of the test debugging factors according to the test debugging model, wherein specifically, the objective function expression is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,Min S i is as followsiAn objective function of the individual trial tuning factors,Din order to adjust the number of steps in the debugging period,
test 1 factors were adjustedp-kThe sum of the response processes of the parameters of the test debugging factors at the test point,S i(d) The response process of the parameter at the test point for the output of the ith trial adjustment factor,
the constraint conditions include an error balance constraint, a maximum parameter level constraint for the trial debug factor, a parameter level constraint for the trial debug factor at the end of a trial debug period, an output allowable amplitude constraint for the trial debug factor,
wherein the error balance constraint isiTest debugging factors are given inDThe specific expression of the constraint parameters output by the steps is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiTest debugging factors are given inDThe parameters to be input in the beginning of the step,
is as followsiTest debugging factors are given inDThe parameters of the calculation are started in steps,
debugging factors for the ith test from step 1 to theDThe average parameter of the response process of the step at the test point,
the expression of the maximum parameter level constraint of the trial debugging factors is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe highest parametric level constraints of the trial tuning factors,
is as followsiTest debugging factor IdThe level of the sub-parameter is,
is as followsiThe start-up parameter level of the trial tuning factors,
to test the parameter levels of the tuning factors,
is as followsiThe level of the trial-and-error factor is the actual design parameter,
the expression of the parameter level constraint of the test debugging factors at the end of the test debugging period is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe trial debug factors are constrained at the parameter level at the end of the debug period,
is as followsiTrial commissioning factors allow control parameter level constraints at the end of the commissioning period,
the expression of the output allowable amplitude constraint of the test debugging factor is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is as followsiThe amplitude of the adjacent secondary parameters of the test debugging factors,
is as followsiTesting the allowable parameter amplitude of the debugging factor;
and testing and debugging the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition.
2. The test debugging method of an ultrasonic wire harness welder according to claim 1, wherein said test point parameter distribution model comprises inherent deviation process, high order error line, difference parameter of said test point, and parameters of response process of said test debugging factor at said test point and of response process of said test debugging factor at said test point within a debugging parameter start-stop order.
3. The test debugging method of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to claim 2, wherein the difference parameter of the test point is the amount by which the test point exceeds the high-order error line, and the specific expression is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
is a difference parameter of the test point,min order to test the number of factors,S i ’(d) Is as followsiThe response process of each test debugging factor at the test point,
in the form of a high-order error line,din order to have a long interval, the interval is long,
in order to be the amount of variation in the interval length,
is a horizontal parameter interval.
4. The test debugging method of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to claim 3, wherein the response process of the test debugging factor at the test point is a parameter within a debugging parameter start-stop order, and the specific expression is as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,H iis as followsiThe response process of each test debugging factor at the test point is positioned in the parameter within the debugging parameter starting and stopping sequence,nand debugging the horizontal number for the test of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine.
5. The test debugging method of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine according to claim 4, wherein the test debugging of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine is performed according to the intermediate coefficient, the sensitivity coefficient, the objective function and the constraint condition, and comprises the following steps:
respectively determining the factor number of the test debugging factors and the debugging sequence of the test debugging factors according to the intermediate coefficient and the sensitivity coefficient;
and calculating the optimal solution of the target function by adopting a global control grouping algorithm according to the debugging sequence, the factor number and the constraint condition so as to obtain a test debugging result of the ultrasonic wire harness welding machine.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110916225.1A CN113351982B (en) | 2021-08-11 | 2021-08-11 | Test debugging method of ultrasonic wire harness welding machine |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110916225.1A CN113351982B (en) | 2021-08-11 | 2021-08-11 | Test debugging method of ultrasonic wire harness welding machine |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113351982A CN113351982A (en) | 2021-09-07 |
| CN113351982B true CN113351982B (en) | 2021-11-16 |
Family
ID=77522917
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110916225.1A Active CN113351982B (en) | 2021-08-11 | 2021-08-11 | Test debugging method of ultrasonic wire harness welding machine |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113351982B (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2007237256A (en) * | 2006-03-09 | 2007-09-20 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Apparatus and method for ultra-sonic joining |
| CN107885895A (en) * | 2016-09-30 | 2018-04-06 | 长城汽车股份有限公司 | The optimization method and optimization device of a kind of powertrain mounting system |
| CN109774164A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-05-21 | 广州桃琳软件科技有限公司 | A kind of production management method based on rotating disc type ultrasonic welding machine |
| CN111203628A (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2020-05-29 | 无锡先导智能装备股份有限公司 | Welding detection method and welding equipment |
| CN112427797A (en) * | 2020-11-04 | 2021-03-02 | 珠海泰坦新动力电子有限公司 | Visual debugging method, device, system and medium for welding machine |
-
2021
- 2021-08-11 CN CN202110916225.1A patent/CN113351982B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2007237256A (en) * | 2006-03-09 | 2007-09-20 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Apparatus and method for ultra-sonic joining |
| CN107885895A (en) * | 2016-09-30 | 2018-04-06 | 长城汽车股份有限公司 | The optimization method and optimization device of a kind of powertrain mounting system |
| CN111203628A (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2020-05-29 | 无锡先导智能装备股份有限公司 | Welding detection method and welding equipment |
| CN109774164A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-05-21 | 广州桃琳软件科技有限公司 | A kind of production management method based on rotating disc type ultrasonic welding machine |
| CN112427797A (en) * | 2020-11-04 | 2021-03-02 | 珠海泰坦新动力电子有限公司 | Visual debugging method, device, system and medium for welding machine |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 层叠式锂电池制造中金属极片的超声波焊接工艺优化方法;李东;《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库（硕士） 工程科技II辑》;20130715(第07期);第C042-1171页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113351982A (en) | 2021-09-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110988690B (en) | Battery state of health correction method, device, management system and storage medium | |
| WO2019085426A1 (en) | Automatic lithium battery sorting method, storage medium, and battery sorting device | |
| CN109543941B (en) | Method for determining accident strategy fixed value of nuclear power plant based on containment working condition | |
| EP1841037A2 (en) | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining parameter values associated with an electrical grid | |
| CN105929333B (en) | The inspection method of secondary cell | |
| CN111667550A (en) | Test method for judging quality of fitting curve | |
| CN108205114B (en) | Method and system for predicting service life of battery | |
| CN112381671B (en) | Broadband oscillation risk assessment method for new energy station grid-connected power system | |
| CN109345113B (en) | Wind turbine performance evaluation method and medium | |
| CN113351982B (en) | Test debugging method of ultrasonic wire harness welding machine | |
| CN104090166B (en) | A kind of power network line on-line parameter identification method for considering the big error dot of state estimation | |
| US20200341065A1 (en) | Safety estimation device for batteries and safety estimation method for batteries | |
| CN111537888A (en) | Data-driven echelon battery SOC prediction method | |
| CN116008811A (en) | Online joint estimation method and system for residual capacity, SOC and self-discharge capacity of battery | |
| CN109217304A (en) | Line parameter circuit value discrimination method based on the measurement of WAMS system quantities | |
| CN117593854A (en) | Intelligent water supply system | |
| CN104679656B (en) | A kind of combined test method of adaptive adjustment defects detection rate | |
| CN116739415A (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for evaluating software development efficiency | |
| CN112421616B (en) | Method and system for identifying device parameters in main network of power grid | |
| CN112622664B (en) | System and method for detecting temperature in charging pile | |
| CN110866338B (en) | Method and device for solving apparent impedance model based on coupling impedance model | |
| US20230089279A1 (en) | A method for controlling a renewable power plant during voltage events | |
| US20210302502A1 (en) | Method, computer-implemented tool and battery management system for estimating states of health of batteries storing electrical enery and battery energy storage system | |
| TW202201019A (en) | Secondary cell inspection method and secondary cell inspection device | |
| CN112577456A (en) | Measuring equipment point inspection method, operation control device and computer readable storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CP01 | Change in the name or title of a patent holder | ||
| CP01 | Change in the name or title of a patent holder |
Address after: 213164 1st floor, block C, Tianhong science and technology building, Changzhou science and Education City, Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province Patentee after: China National Machinery Institute Group Jiangsu Branch Co.,Ltd. Address before: 213164 1st floor, block C, Tianhong science and technology building, Changzhou science and Education City, Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province Patentee before: Jiangsu Branch Co., Ltd. of Mechanical Science Research Institute |