CN112561245A

CN112561245A - Collaborative management method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Info

Publication number: CN112561245A
Application number: CN202011353500.5A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 王春冰; 李贤民; 谢红云; 张黎明; 卢超; 平嘉临; 张超; 段奇志; 范一鹏; 毛万朝
Original assignee: China General Nuclear Power Corp; China Nuclear Power Engineering Co Ltd; CGN Power Co Ltd; Shenzhen China Guangdong Nuclear Engineering Design Co Ltd
Current assignee: China General Nuclear Power Corp; China Nuclear Power Engineering Co Ltd; CGN Power Co Ltd; Shenzhen China Guangdong Nuclear Engineering Design Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-11-27
Filing date: 2020-11-27
Publication date: 2021-03-26
Anticipated expiration: 2040-11-27
Also published as: CN112561245B

Abstract

The application relates to a collaborative management method, a collaborative management device, a computer device and a storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station; determining a target verification person corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset first corresponding relation; the first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel; sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to a target verification worker, and receiving an actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station; and determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to an applicant. By adopting the method, the efficient cooperative office work between the applicant and the verification personnel can be realized.

Description

Collaborative management method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Technical Field

The present application relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a collaborative management method, an apparatus, a computer device, and a storage medium.

Background

In the current social development, environmental pollution and energy shortage are global problems to be solved urgently. Nuclear power generation has the advantages of low pollution, high energy density, stable power generation cost and the like, so that nuclear power becomes an important energy form for worldwide research, and the construction of nuclear power plants is rising day by day.

Due to the particularity of high energy and high radiation of nuclear energy, the construction of the nuclear power station has strict requirements on safety, quality, construction period and schedule of each project, and the construction of the nuclear power station can be safely and efficiently carried out only by the close cooperation of multiple departments and multiple personnel.

Particularly, in the design and debugging stage of the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station, frequent communication and intercommunication between two departments need to be designed and debugged to work cooperatively, the design and debugging are used as two independent departments, and business traffic between an upstream department and a downstream department is mostly communicated through a letter, so that the efficiency is low, and centralized management is inconvenient.

Disclosure of Invention

In view of the foregoing, it is necessary to provide a collaborative management method, apparatus, computer device, and storage medium for solving the above technical problems.

A collaborative management method, comprising:

receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

determining a target verification person corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset first corresponding relation; the first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel;

sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to a target verification worker, and receiving an actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

and determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to an applicant.

In one embodiment, the method further includes:

determining a target verification process corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset second corresponding relation; the second corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification processes; the target verification process comprises a task link to be confirmed when a program file to be verified runs on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

and sending the target verification process to a target verification person.

In one embodiment, before sending the target verification process to the target verification personnel, the method further includes:

receiving a plan verification date of plan implementation verification, and determining a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in a target verification process according to the plan verification date and an application date of verification application;

associating the scheduled finishing time with the corresponding task link to form a target verification flow with the scheduled finishing time;

correspondingly, the target verification process is sent to the target verification personnel, and the method comprises the following steps:

and sending the target verification process with the planned completion time to a target verification person.

In one embodiment, the method further includes:

receiving the actual completion time recorded by the target verification personnel for completing the corresponding task link;

and if the actual completion time is later than the planned completion time, sending an overdue prompt to the target verification personnel.

In one embodiment, the method further includes:

acquiring a first ratio of the number of completed task links to the number of all task links in a target verification process;

acquiring a first time difference between the current date and the planned verification date and a second time difference between the application date of the verification application and the planned verification date, and calculating a second ratio of the first time difference to the second time difference;

and determining whether to send out an overdue reminder to an applicant or not according to the first ratio, the second ratio and a preset ratio.

In one embodiment, the first ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of completed task links by the number of all task links in the target verification process; the second ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the first time difference by the second time difference; whether to send out the excess period according to first ratio, second ratio and preset ratio and remind to the applicant, include:

and if the first ratio is smaller than the preset ratio and the second ratio is larger than the preset ratio, sending an overdue prompt to an applicant.

In one embodiment, the method further includes:

receiving a delay application and a delay completion moment corresponding to a task link to be delayed;

replacing the same task link in the target verification process with the corresponding plan completion time by adopting the delay completion time corresponding to the task link to be delayed to obtain a target verification process with the delay completion time;

and sending the target verification process with the postponed completion moment to a target verification person.

A collaborative management apparatus comprising:

the data receiving module is used for receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

the personnel determining module is used for determining a target verification personnel corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset first corresponding relation; the first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel;

the result transceiving module is used for sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verification personnel and receiving the actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

and the verification feedback module is used for determining a collaborative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result and feeding the collaborative verification result back to the applicant.

A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the computer program:

A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored which, when executed by a processor, carries out the steps of:

The cooperative management method, the cooperative management device, the computer equipment and the storage medium receive the verification application of the target verification type, the program file to be verified comprising the program code for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station and the expected verification result, and determines the target verification personnel corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to the preset corresponding first corresponding relation, to send the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verification personnel, and receive the actual verification result obtained by the program file to be verified running on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station, further determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to the applicant who proposes the verification application, thereby realizing efficient cooperative work between the applicant and the verification personnel, and the digital management of verification application in the cooperative operation of the foreground and the background of the design and debugging of the instrument control of the nuclear power station is facilitated.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a diagram of an application environment of a collaborative management method according to an embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method of collaborative management according to an embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a design and commissioning process of instrumentation and control equipment of a nuclear power plant according to an embodiment;

FIG. 4 is a schematic flow chart illustrating the approval process in one embodiment;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a privilege change process in one embodiment;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a cooperative management method according to another embodiment;

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a cooperative management method according to another embodiment;

FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a cooperative management method according to another embodiment;

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a cooperative management method according to another embodiment;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a deferred application process according to an embodiment;

FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a cooperative management method according to another embodiment;

FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a cooperation management apparatus in one embodiment;

FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an internal structure of a computer device according to an embodiment.

Detailed Description

In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the present application is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application.

The collaborative management method provided by the application can be applied to the application environment shown in fig. 1. The upstream terminal 102 and the downstream terminal 106 communicate with the server 104 via a network, respectively. An applicant initiates a verification application of a target verification type through the upstream terminal 102, and uploads a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station. The server 104 receives a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result, and determines a target verification person corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset first corresponding relation; the first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel. The server 104 sends the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verifier, and the target verifier sends the actual verification result obtained by running the program file to be verified on the instrument control device of the nuclear power station to the server 104 through the downstream terminal 106. The server 104 determines a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeds back the cooperative verification result to the applicant. The upstream terminal 102 and the downstream terminal 106 may be, but not limited to, various personal computers, notebook computers, smart phones, tablet computers, and portable wearable devices, and the server 104 may be implemented by an independent server or a server cluster composed of a plurality of servers.

In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, a collaborative management method is provided, which is described by taking the application of the method to the server in fig. 1 as an example, and includes the following steps:

s210, receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result.

The program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station.

The instrumentation and Control device of the nuclear power plant is a Distributed Control System (DCS) applied to the nuclear power plant, and is used for controlling the operation of each device in the nuclear power plant.

As shown in fig. 3, in the process of designing and debugging the instrumentation and control device of the nuclear power plant, firstly, a designer needs to set up a virtual DCS platform through an engineering simulator to simulate the operating environment of the real DCS of the nuclear power plant, and then the designer runs a design file (program file) on the virtual DCS platform to perform background verification on the design file and obtain a background verification result. The designer compares the background verification result with the target result, repeatedly performs background verification and design file modification until the background verification result obtained by the operation of the modified design file on the virtual DCS platform reaches the target result, and then sends the modified design file to a debugging person (downstream department) through a mail, and the debugging person operates the modified design file in the semi-virtual DCS platform constructed by the engineering simulator connected with the field equipment so as to perform foreground verification on the modified design file and obtain a foreground verification result. And the debugging personnel feeds back the obtained foreground verification result to the corresponding designer through a mail, and the designer confirms whether the design file needs to be further modified according to the foreground verification result. If the design file does not need to be modified, the final design file can be operated on the real DCS of the nuclear power station; if the design file needs to be modified, the designer modifies the design file and continues to perform the background verification and the foreground verification. Through the process, the cooperative operation of the front platform and the back platform of the instrument control design and debugging of the nuclear power station is realized.

Optionally, in the cooperative operation process of the foreground and background of the nuclear power plant instrument control design and debugging, a designer needs to provide verification applications for verification of design files, the verification applications can be divided into different types of verification applications according to verification objects, verification contents, verification scales or verification departments, and the verification personnel/verification departments corresponding to the different types of verification applications are different.

Optionally, the expected verification result may be whether the nuclear power equipment controlled by the nuclear power plant instrument control equipment is operating, or may be a specific operation index of the nuclear power equipment, such as start-up duration, output electric quantity, output power, and the like.

Specifically, the server receives a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result, which are proposed by an applicant. For example, the server receives a verification request of an applicant for the start-stop control of a nuclear reactor in a nuclear power plant, and receives a program file to be verified and an expected verification result uploaded by the applicant. The program file to be verified is a design file which runs on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station to realize the control of the starting and stopping of the nuclear reactor, and the expected verification result is an expected operation index, such as starting duration, output nuclear power and the like, of the nuclear reactor.

S220, determining a target verification person corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to the preset first corresponding relation.

The first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel.

And S230, sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to a target verifier, and receiving an actual verification result.

And the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station.

Specifically, the server extracts a target verifier corresponding to the target verification type in a preset first corresponding relationship, and sends a program file to be verified and an expected verification result to the target verifier. And the target verification personnel operates the received program file to be verified in the semi-virtual DCS platform to obtain an actual verification result, and uploads the actual verification result to the server.

And S240, determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to an applicant.

Specifically, the server compares the actual verification result with the expected verification result, for example, whether the actual verification result is the same as the expected verification result or whether the actual verification result meets a preset error range, so as to obtain a collaborative verification result, and feeds back the collaborative verification result to the applicant who provided the verification application.

Optionally, the collaborative verification result may include verification success or verification failure. For example, if the actual verification result is the same as the expected verification result, or meets a preset error range, the cooperative verification result is successful; and if the actual verification result is different from the expected verification result or the preset error range is not met, the cooperative verification result is verification failure. Optionally, the collaborative verification result may further include a specific error between the operation index in the actual verification result and the expected verification result.

Optionally, before S220 and before S240, the collaborative management method further includes an approval process inside the applicant and inside the target verifier, and a specific process is shown in fig. 4. The applicant initiates a target-validation-type validation application process, fills in/modifies validation requirements, such as a planned validation day, and submits validation material, such as the program file to be validated as described above. The server forwards the verification requirement and the verification material of the verification application to the upper level of the applicant, and the upper level of the applicant performs requirement verification. If the verification is not passed, the verification application is returned to the applicant, and a reason for the failure is sent to prompt the applicant to further modify the verification application. And if the verification is passed, executing S220-S230, confirming each verification condition (task link) by the target verification personnel according to the target verification process, clarifying the target verification personnel with an applicant (demander) when a certain verification condition is not passed, returning the verification application to the applicant if the applicant still needs to verify, and sending the verification condition which is not passed to prompt the applicant to further modify the verification application. If the applicant confirms that the verification is not carried out any more, the flow information is directly recorded and filed and stored in a warehouse. And after the target verification personnel performs verification, the superior of the target verification personnel is required to verify the actual verification result, if the verification is not passed, the verification is required to be performed again so as to verify the obtained new actual verification result, if the verification is passed, S240 is executed to confirm the verification result with the demander, if the demander confirms that the actual verification result meets the requirement, the flow information is recorded, and the flow is filed, stored and ended. And if the demander confirms that the actual verification result does not meet the requirement, returning to re-implement verification to obtain a new actual verification result.

Optionally, the collaborative management method further includes authorization management of different persons, and a specific process is shown in fig. 5. The method comprises the steps that an applicant starts an authority change process, an authorized new or modified application is submitted, namely, the application for adding or modifying the authority of the applicant or other personnel is submitted, a server checks the role/level of the applicant, for example, if the applicant is not group leader, the application is sent to the group leader for checking, if the checking is not passed, the applicant is returned for modification, if the checking is passed, the system management group leader checking is entered, and if the applicant is group leader, the system management group leader checking is directly entered. If the system management group leader does not pass the audit, returning to the applicant for modification, if the system management group leader passes the audit, distributing the permission change task to the group members, completing the authorization configuration by the group members, returning to the confirmation of the demand side, and ending the process after the confirmation of the demand side.

In this embodiment, the server receives a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified including a program code for controlling the operation of the instrumentation and control device of the nuclear power plant, and an expected verification result, and determines the target verification personnel corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to the preset corresponding first corresponding relation, to send the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verification personnel, and receive the actual verification result obtained by the program file to be verified running on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station, further determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to the applicant who proposes the verification application, thereby realizing efficient cooperative work between the applicant and the verification personnel, and the digital management of verification application in the cooperative operation of the foreground and the background of the design and debugging of the instrument control of the nuclear power station is facilitated.

In an embodiment, to improve the ordering of collaborative offices, as shown in fig. 6, the collaborative management method further includes:

s610, determining a target verification process corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to the preset second corresponding relation.

The second corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification processes. The target verification process comprises a task link to be confirmed when a program file to be verified runs on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station.

Optionally, the authentication applications of different authentication types correspond to different authentication processes. For example, the verification process corresponding to the small-scale experimental verification application includes: procedure data verification-implementation site verification. The program data verification comprises the verification of whether the uploaded program file to be verified is complete or whether the uploaded program file to be verified and an expected verification result correspond to each other. Performing site verification includes verifying that personnel are available to verify that the site is available on a planned verification day. The verification process corresponding to the large-scale test verification application comprises the following steps: process data verification-technical support verification-implementation site verification. The technical support verification comprises verification of whether a verification person can perform supervision at an implementation site on a planned verification day.

And S620, sending the target verification process to a target verification person.

Specifically, the server extracts a target verification process corresponding to the target verification type from a preset second corresponding relationship, and sends the target verification process to the target verification staff. Alternatively, the target verification persons may be one or two. When one target verification person is available, the server sends a target verification flow to the target verification person, and the target verification person verifies each task link in the received target verification flow one by one; and after the target verification process is verified in the last task link, the server sends the target verification process to the target verification personnel corresponding to the next task link in sequence, and each target verification personnel verifies the corresponding task link.

In this embodiment, the server determines, according to the preset second correspondence, a target verification process corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type, and sends the target verification process to the target verification staff, and because the target verification process includes a task link to be confirmed when the program file to be verified is run on the instrument control device of the nuclear power station, the target verification staff can confirm the task links in the target verification process one by one, so that the orderliness of cooperative office work is improved.

In one embodiment, to improve the aging management of the collaborative office, as shown in fig. 7, before S620, the method further includes:

and S710, receiving a plan verification date of the plan implementation verification, and determining a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in the target verification process according to the plan verification date and the application date of the verification application.

Specifically, the server receives a plan verification date of plan implementation verification input by an applicant, acquires an application date of a received verification application, and determines a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in a target verification process according to the plan verification date and the application date. For example, the planned verification date is 10, the application date of the verification application is 5, the server determines the time length available for completing the target verification process according to the planned verification date and the application date, that is, the planned verification date-application date-1 (the planned verification date is not currently calculated) is 10-5-1 or 4 days, the time length (4 days) available for completing the target verification process is evenly distributed to each task link in the target verification process, and the planned completion time corresponding to each task link is correspondingly obtained. For example, if the target verification process includes three task links of program data verification, technical support verification and site verification, the time length (4 days) available for completing the target verification process is averagely distributed to the 3 task links, the time length available for completing each task link is 4/3 days, the time length is 16 hours when the time length is converted into an hour, and the planned completion time corresponding to each task link in the target verification process can be obtained by further combining the specific time of the application day.

And S720, associating the scheduled finishing time with the corresponding task link to form a target verification process with the scheduled finishing time.

Accordingly, S620 includes:

Specifically, the server associates the obtained plan completion time with the corresponding task link to form a target verification flow with the plan completion time, and sends the target verification flow with the plan completion time to the target verification personnel to prompt the target verification personnel to complete the corresponding task link according to time limit, so that the timeliness management of the cooperative office is improved, and meanwhile, the verification is ensured to be carried out according to time.

Optionally, to further improve the verification efficiency, as shown in fig. 8, the method further includes:

and S810, receiving the actual completion time recorded by the target verification personnel for completing the corresponding task link.

And S820, if the actual completion time is later than the planned completion time, sending an overdue prompt to the target verification personnel.

Optionally, the expiration prompt may be in a form of a popup window, or may be in a form of a label on the target verification process. Optionally, the task link corresponding to the expiration may be marked with a striking color, or the task link corresponding to the expiration may be marked with a character.

Specifically, after the target verifier completes the corresponding task link, the actual completion time of the task link is recorded into the server, and the server compares the actual completion time of the task link with the planned completion time and determines whether to send out an overdue prompt to the target verifier according to the comparison result. And if the actual completion time of the task link is later than the planned completion time, sending an overdue prompt to a target verifier. And if the actual completion time of the task link is not later than the planned completion time, not sending an overdue prompt to the target verification personnel.

Optionally, when the target verification person is a person, if the previous task link is out of date, the server sends a popup window type out of date prompt to the target verification person, and if the next task link is still out of date, the server continues to send the popup window type out of date prompt to the target verification person to prompt the target verification person to accelerate verification and avoid delaying verification until a certain task link is not out of date, and the server stops sending out the out of date prompt to the target verification person. When the target verification personnel are multiple persons and each task link corresponds to one person, the server sends out a popup window type overdue prompt to the target verification personnel corresponding to the next task link when the previous task link is overdue so as to prompt the target verification personnel of the next task link to accelerate verification, delay verification is avoided, and when a certain task link is not overdue, the server stops sending out the overdue prompt to the target verification personnel corresponding to the next task node of the task node which is not overdue.

Optionally, to improve the flexibility of collaborative office, as shown in fig. 9, the method further includes:

s910, receiving a delay application and a delay completion moment corresponding to a task link to be delayed.

Optionally, the deferred application includes that the target verifier provides a deferred application to a scheduled completion time of the corresponding task link when any task link in the target verification process fails to verify, the deferred application may also include that the target verifier expects that verification cannot be performed on a scheduled verification day according to a schedule, and the applicant provides a deferred application to a scheduled verification day by temporarily modifying a program file.

If the deferred application is the deferred application performed at the planned completion moment of the task link, the task link to be deferred is a specific task link in the target task flow; and if the postponing application is an application for postponing a plan verification day, the task links to be postponed are all task links in the target task flow.

Specifically, the server receives the deferred application and the deferred completion time corresponding to the task link to be deferred, for example, the server receives the deferred application of the target verifier for the task link whose technical support verifies the technical support, and receives the deferred completion time corresponding to the task link, which is recorded by the target verifier.

And S920, replacing the plan completion time corresponding to the same task link in the target verification process with the postpone completion time corresponding to the task link to be postponed to obtain the target verification process with the postpone completion time.

And S930, sending the target verification process with the delay completion time to a target verification person.

Specifically, if the postponing completion time is earlier than the planning completion time of the next task node, replacing the planning completion time corresponding to the same task link in the target verification process with the postponing completion time corresponding to the task link to be postponed to obtain the target verification process with the postponing completion time, and sending the target verification process with the postponing completion time to the target verification personnel to prompt the target verification personnel to verify each task link one by one according to the target verification process with the postponing completion time. And if the delay completion time is later than the plan completion time of the next task node and is earlier than the plan verification day, replacing the plan completion time corresponding to the same task link in the target verification flow with the delay completion time corresponding to the task link to be delayed, determining the verification time available for the rest of the task links according to the delay completion time and the plan verification day, and determining the new plan completion time of each rest of the task links according to the verification time available for the rest of the task links and the rest of the task links to obtain a new target verification flow. And if the delay completion time is later than the plan verification date, reminding an applicant to delay the plan verification date.

Alternatively, the specific process of the deferred application is shown in fig. 10. The method comprises the steps that an applicant starts a verification application flow, a verification plan is input, if the verification plan is planned on a verification day, a target verifier starts verification work, verification is carried out one by one according to the target verification flow, progress is input regularly, namely the completion condition of each task link, as an actual completion moment, a server compares the actual completion moment with the plan completion time of the corresponding task link, whether the node (the task link) is overdue is confirmed, if the node (the task link) is not overdue and the overdue risk exists, an early warning prompt is sent to the applicant, if the node (the task link) is overdue, the target verifier is prompted to initiate a postpone application to fill in postpone reasons and specific adjustment contents, if the task link needing to be postponed and the corresponding postpone completion moment. Correspondingly, the server sends the deferred application to the superior of the target verification personnel for verification, if the verification is passed, the intelligent verification plan is correspondingly regulated and verified according to the modified verification plan until the verification is completed according to the date, and the process is ended. And if the audit is not passed, returning to the target verifier to modify the deferred application.

Optionally, the collaborative management method further includes change management of a specific verification plan in the verification application, including not only change of a deadline time, but also change of an uploaded program file to be verified, a target verification person, and a task link in a target verification process. Specifically, the change management is classified into input type change management and output type change management, and the change management proposed for changing the verification requirement is input type change management, and the change management proposed for changing the verification result is output type change management.

In this embodiment, the server determines a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in the completion target verification process according to a plan verification date and an application date of the verification application, forms a target verification process with the plan completion time, and sends the target verification process with the plan completion time to the target verifier, so as to prompt the target verifier to sequentially complete each task link in the target verification process according to the plan completion time, and receive an actual completion time at which the corresponding task link is completed, and send an overdue prompt to the target verifier when the actual completion time is later than the plan completion time, thereby further improving verification efficiency. Meanwhile, a deferred application can be initiated based on an applicant or a verifier, so that the flexibility of system office is improved.

In one embodiment, to further improve the efficiency of collaborative office, as shown in fig. 11, the method further includes:

s1110, a first ratio of the number of completed task links to the number of all task links in the target verification process is obtained.

Wherein, the task link receiving the actual completion moment is the completed task link. The first ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of completed task links by the number of all task links in the target verification process.

For example, the target verification process: program data verification, technical support verification and site verification implementation, wherein the method comprises 3 task links, the number of all task links in the target verification process is 3, if the program data verification in the 3 task links receives the actual completion time, the number of the task links completed in the target verification process is 1, and the first ratio is 1/3.

S1120, acquiring a first time difference between the current date and the application date of the verification application and a second time difference between the application date of the verification application and the planned verification date, and calculating a second ratio of the first time difference to the second time difference.

And the second ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the first time difference by the second time difference.

For example, the current date is 8, the date of application of the certification application is 5, the planned certification date is 10, the first time difference is 8-5-3, the second time difference is 10-5, and the second ratio is 3/5.

S1130, whether an overdue reminder is sent to an applicant or not is determined according to the first ratio, the second ratio and a preset ratio.

Specifically, if the first ratio is smaller than the preset ratio and the second ratio is larger than the preset ratio, an overdue reminder is sent to an applicant.

Optionally, the predetermined ratio is 1/2. When the first ratio is 1/3 and the second ratio is 3/5, the first ratio 1/3 is smaller than a preset ratio 1/2, the second ratio 3/5 is larger than a preset ratio 1/2, the fact that the current task progress (the first ratio) is not over half and the time progress (the second ratio) is over half indicates that the current task progress (the first ratio) is over half, and the whole target verification process has an overdue risk, an overdue prompt is sent to an applicant, so that the applicant further supervises the work of the target verifier, the cooperative office efficiency is improved, and the whole verification progress is prevented from being delayed.

Optionally, the collaborative management method further includes management of archiving and saving the files, such as security level management, where people in different departments and levels have different consulting authorities, and files in different levels also have corresponding different consulting authorities. For example, classification management is performed, and the classification is performed according to the relevance of the content, the specialty, the equipment, the system and the like of the file design, so that a knowledge base which is convenient for a user to query and share information is formed. Such as push management, for example, users subscribing to relevant file information send updated file material periodically or in time, and so on.

It should be understood that although the various steps in the flow charts of fig. 1-11 are shown in order as indicated by the arrows, the steps are not necessarily performed in order as indicated by the arrows. The steps are not performed in the exact order shown and described, and may be performed in other orders, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Moreover, at least some of the steps in fig. 1-11 may include multiple steps or multiple stages, which are not necessarily performed at the same time, but may be performed at different times, which are not necessarily performed in sequence, but may be performed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least some of the other steps.

In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 12, there is provided a cooperation management apparatus including: a data receiving module 1201, a personnel determining module 1202, a result transceiving module 1203 and a verification feedback module 1203, wherein:

the data receiving module 1201 is configured to receive a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified, and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

the personnel determining module 1202 is configured to determine a target verification personnel corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset first corresponding relationship; the first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel;

the result transceiving module 1203 is configured to send the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verification staff, and receive an actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

the verification feedback module 1204 is configured to determine a collaborative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feed back the collaborative verification result to the applicant.

In one embodiment, the above apparatus further comprises: a target flow module;

the target process module is used for determining a target verification process corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset second corresponding relation; the second corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification processes; the target verification process comprises a task link to be confirmed when a program file to be verified runs on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station; and sending the target verification process to a target verification person.

In one embodiment, the above apparatus further comprises: a time generation module;

the time generation module is used for receiving a plan verification day of the plan implementation verification and determining a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in the target verification flow according to the plan verification day and an application day of the verification application; associating the scheduled finishing time with the corresponding task link to form a target verification flow with the scheduled finishing time; correspondingly, the result transceiving module is also used for sending the target verification process with the planned completion time to the target verification personnel.

In one embodiment, the above apparatus further comprises: an expiration reminding device;

the overdue reminding device is used for receiving the actual completion time of completing the corresponding task link, which is recorded by the target verification personnel; and if the actual completion time is later than the planned completion time, sending an overdue prompt to the target verification personnel.

In one embodiment, the apparatus further includes: a device for reminding the expiration;

the time-out reminding device is used for acquiring a first ratio of the number of completed task links to the number of all task links in the target verification process; acquiring a first time difference between the current date and the planned verification date and a second time difference between the application date of the verification application and the planned verification date, and calculating a second ratio of the first time difference to the second time difference; and determining whether to send out an overdue reminder to an applicant or not according to the first ratio, the second ratio and a preset ratio.

In one embodiment, the first ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of completed task links by the number of all task links in the target verification process; the second ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the first time difference by the second time difference; the overdue reminding device is specifically used for: and sending out an overdue prompt to an applicant under the condition that the first ratio is smaller than the preset ratio and the second ratio is larger than the preset ratio.

In one embodiment, the apparatus further includes: a deferred application module;

the delay application module is used for receiving a delay application and a delay completion moment corresponding to a task link to be delayed; replacing the same task link in the target verification process with the corresponding plan completion time by adopting the delay completion time corresponding to the task link to be delayed to obtain a target verification process with the delay completion time; and sending the target verification process with the postponed completion moment to a target verification person.

For specific limitations of the collaborative management apparatus, reference may be made to the above limitations of the collaborative management method, which are not described herein again. The modules in the cooperative management apparatus may be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, and a combination thereof. The modules can be embedded in a hardware form or independent from a processor in the computer device, and can also be stored in a memory in the computer device in a software form, so that the processor can call and execute operations corresponding to the modules.

In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in fig. 13. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a communication interface, a display screen, and an input device connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The communication interface of the computer device is used for carrying out wired or wireless communication with an external terminal, and the wireless communication can be realized through WIFI, an operator network, NFC (near field communication) or other technologies. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement a collaborative management method. The display screen of the computer equipment can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer equipment can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, a key, a track ball or a touch pad arranged on the shell of the computer equipment, an external keyboard, a touch pad or a mouse and the like.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the architecture shown in fig. 13 is merely a block diagram of some of the structures associated with the disclosed aspects and is not intended to limit the computing devices to which the disclosed aspects apply, as particular computing devices may include more or less components than those shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having a computer program stored therein, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the computer program:

receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station; determining a target verification person corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset first corresponding relation; the first corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification personnel; sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to a target verification worker, and receiving an actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station; and determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to an applicant.

In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of:

determining a target verification process corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset second corresponding relation; the second corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification processes; the target verification process comprises a task link to be confirmed when a program file to be verified runs on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station; and sending the target verification process to a target verification person.

receiving a plan verification date of plan implementation verification, and determining a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in a target verification process according to the plan verification date and an application date of verification application; associating the scheduled finishing time with the corresponding task link to form a target verification flow with the scheduled finishing time; and sending the target verification process with the planned completion time to a target verification person.

receiving the actual completion time recorded by the target verification personnel for completing the corresponding task link; and if the actual completion time is later than the planned completion time, sending an overdue prompt to the target verification personnel.

acquiring a first ratio of the number of completed task links to the number of all task links in a target verification process; acquiring a first time difference between the current date and the planned verification date and a second time difference between the application date of the verification application and the planned verification date, and calculating a second ratio of the first time difference to the second time difference; and determining whether to send out an overdue reminder to an applicant or not according to the first ratio, the second ratio and a preset ratio.

In one embodiment, the first ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of completed task links by the number of all task links in the target verification process; the second ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the first time difference by the second time difference; the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of:

receiving a delay application and a delay completion moment corresponding to a task link to be delayed; replacing the same task link in the target verification process with the corresponding plan completion time by adopting the delay completion time corresponding to the task link to be delayed to obtain a target verification process with the delay completion time; and sending the target verification process with the postponed completion moment to a target verification person.

In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, having a computer program stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, performs the steps of:

In one embodiment, the computer program when executed by the processor further performs the steps of:

In one embodiment, the first ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of completed task links by the number of all task links in the target verification process; the second ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the first time difference by the second time difference; the computer program when executed by the processor further realizes the steps of:

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above can be implemented by hardware instructions of a computer program, which can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, can include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided herein can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile Memory may include Read-Only Memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash Memory, optical storage, or the like. Volatile Memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache Memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM can take many forms, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) or Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), among others.

The technical features of the above embodiments can be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described, but should be considered as the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.

The above-mentioned embodiments only express several embodiments of the present application, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, which falls within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent shall be subject to the appended claims.

Claims

1. A collaboration management method, the method comprising:

receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verification personnel, and receiving an actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

and determining a cooperative verification result according to the actual verification result and the expected verification result, and feeding back the cooperative verification result to the applicant.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining a target verification process corresponding to the verification application of the target verification type according to a preset second corresponding relation; the second corresponding relation comprises corresponding relations between verification applications of different verification types and verification processes; the target verification process comprises a task link to be confirmed when the program file to be verified runs on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

and sending the target verification process to the target verification personnel.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein before sending the target verification process to the target verification personnel, further comprising:

receiving a plan verification date of plan implementation verification, and determining a plan completion time corresponding to each task link in the target verification process according to the plan verification date and the application date of the verification application;

associating the plan completion time with the corresponding task link to form a target verification process with the plan completion time;

correspondingly, the sending the target verification process to the target verification personnel includes:

and sending the target verification process with the plan completion time to the target verification personnel.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

acquiring a first ratio of the number of the completed task links to the number of all task links in the target verification process;

acquiring a first time difference between a current date and the planned verification date and a second time difference between the application date of the verification application and the planned verification date, and calculating a second ratio of the first time difference to the second time difference;

and determining whether to send out an overdue prompt to the applicant or not according to the first ratio, the second ratio and a preset ratio.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the first ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of completed task links by the number of all task links in the target verification process; the second ratio is a quotient obtained by dividing the first time difference by the second time difference; the determining whether to send an overdue reminder to the applicant according to the first ratio, the second ratio and a preset ratio includes:

and if the first ratio is smaller than the preset ratio and the second ratio is larger than the preset ratio, sending an overdue prompt to the applicant.

7. The method according to any one of claims 3 to 6, further comprising:

replacing the same task link in the target verification process with the corresponding plan completion time by adopting the delay completion time corresponding to the task link to be delayed to obtain the target verification process with the delay completion time;

and sending the target verification process with the postponed completion moment to the target verification personnel.

8. A collaborative management apparatus, the apparatus comprising:

the data receiving module is used for receiving a verification application of a target verification type, a program file to be verified and an expected verification result; the program file comprises program codes for controlling the operation of instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

the result transceiving module is used for sending the program file to be verified and the expected verification result to the target verification personnel and receiving an actual verification result; the actual verification result is an operation result obtained by operating the program file to be verified on the instrument control equipment of the nuclear power station;

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, wherein the processor implements the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing the computer program.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.