CN112434838A - Isolation deduction model and evaluation method - Google Patents
Isolation deduction model and evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112434838A CN112434838A CN201910777960.1A CN201910777960A CN112434838A CN 112434838 A CN112434838 A CN 112434838A CN 201910777960 A CN201910777960 A CN 201910777960A CN 112434838 A CN112434838 A CN 112434838A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- isolation
- ticket
- instruction
- equipment
- conflict
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 285
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 64
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 39
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003904 radioactive pollution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004904 shortening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002900 solid radioactive waste Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of power plant maintenance and operation, and particularly discloses an isolation deduction model and an assessment method. The method specifically comprises the following steps: 1. establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base; 2. setting a preset command for equipment maintenance; 3. collecting maintenance operation work order information; 4. establishing an equipment state conflict matrix model; 5. carrying out isolation deduction evaluation; 6. and (5) adjusting the work order information base according to the equipment conflict evaluation result, and repeatedly deducing according to the step 5, so that the conflict times are reduced, and the optimal maintenance operation scheme is obtained. The isolation deduction model and the assessment method can provide an optimal working scheme for the daily and overhaul periods of the power plant, and greatly reduce the problem of work delay or waiting caused by conflict of work tickets during the daily or overhaul period of the power plant, thereby avoiding possible overhaul work overdue risks and ensuring the safe and reliable operation of a unit during the daily or overhaul period of the power plant.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of power plant maintenance and operation, and particularly relates to an isolation deduction model and an assessment method.
Background
With the implementation of national energy strategy, the nuclear power industry is developing vigorously, and meanwhile, the requirements of the supervision department on nuclear power safety are higher and higher. The operation department, as a direct responsibility department for the safe and stable operation of the power plant, needs to provide safe conditions for the maintenance of the facilities of the power plant by timely and accurately controlling the states of the system, the equipment, the components and the like, so as to ensure the production safety of the power plant in the production preparation and operation stages. This operational behavior of the operation department is called isolation, and specifically includes: operating some kind of running equipment, and cutting off or emptying a working source; closing or opening the equipment facilities and locking and disabling any operations on such equipment; hang tags, alert such devices of special functions and status, etc. The following conditions must be simultaneously fulfilled for the installation of the power plant to be able to serve as an isolation device: firstly, the separation work can be completely carried out; the other is that its isolated state can be forcibly locked. Generally, before a repair job is performed, a job of creating a work environment for the repair is called an isolation listing task; after the maintenance work is completed, the work of restoring the state of the equipment facilities before the maintenance is called an isolation deck-picking task. The isolation listing task and the isolation picking task are used as a preorder task and a postorder task of the work order task and form a complete process of maintenance work together with the work order task.
During the annual overhaul of the power plant, it is usually necessary to complete the implementation of tens of thousands of work orders in a short time, and before the implementation of the work activities, the relevant personnel are clear of the lessons obtained from the operation experience and the risk analysis results of the power plant, and countermeasures have been prepared for the problems which may occur significantly to reduce the potential risks. The information management system is simple and effective and is considered by people to ensure timely contact, coordination, approval and management of work activities. Device state changes to protect personnel, equipment, and the environment during work activities (e.g., hanging security tags) are effectively managed, enforced, and validated. Effective radioactive and pollution work control is implemented to maintain the radioactive dosage to be reasonable and feasible as low as possible, reduce the radioactive pollution of personnel and prevent unnecessary solid radioactive waste from being generated. Prior to work, knowledge of the radioactive environment conditions is sufficient to make appropriate decisions. Good working conditions are kept, industrial safety production management is adopted, and high-standard personal safety is realized.
Most of the work orders relate to equipment isolation, but due to the exclusive characteristic of the equipment facility state in a certain time period, the work orders are determined to be developed according to a certain plan, and the condition that the equipment state conflicts in a certain time period to influence the development of related maintenance work is avoided. The planning of these work orders directly affects the overhaul schedule and thus the production efficiency of the power plant. In order to ensure the reasonability and high efficiency of work order plan arrangement during overhaul, before overhaul, the reasonability of the current overhaul work plan can be checked through an isolation deduction model setting and conflict processing method, the conflict type of the equipment state is identified, and the plan, operation and maintenance departments are guided to optimize the overhaul work plan.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide an isolation deduction model and an evaluation method, which can realize the prejudgment of equipment state conflict and label type conflict in isolation work by simulating the whole work implementation process before the overhaul and daily maintenance work of a power plant, thereby optimizing a work plan, reducing the equipment conflict probability in actual work, realizing the optimal control of the work plan, shortening the maintenance period and improving the operation benefit of the power plant.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows: an isolation deduction model and an evaluation method specifically comprise the following steps:
step 1, establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base;
step 2, setting a preset command for equipment maintenance;
step 3, collecting maintenance operation work order information;
step 4, establishing an equipment state conflict matrix model;
step 4.1, establishing a main ticket conflict model of the main equipment;
aiming at main equipment for maintenance and operation of a power plant, establishing a main equipment matrix type main ticket conflict model by taking a main equipment previous isolation ticket type as a longitudinal axis and a main equipment subsequent isolation ticket type as a transverse axis, wherein the main equipment matrix type main ticket conflict model can assign values to elements in a matrix according to actual conditions and clearly determines whether conflicts are generated between two successive isolation tickets or not;
step 4.2, establishing an edge collision model of the boundary equipment;
for the power plant maintenance operation boundary equipment, establishing a matrix type edge conflict model of the boundary equipment by taking the prior instruction type as a vertical axis and the instruction type as a horizontal axis, and assigning values to the edge conflict model according to the combination of the two instruction types in sequence to determine whether conflict is generated or conflict prompt is formed between the two instruction types in sequence;
step 5, carrying out isolation deduction evaluation;
taking a maintenance operation work plan as a time axis, carrying out simulation deduction on the whole work maintenance process, and carrying out conflict evaluation from three dimensions of equipment state conflict, isolation ticket type conflict and object equipment and boundary equipment conflict according to an equipment state uniqueness principle;
and 6, adjusting the work order information base according to the equipment conflict evaluation result, and repeatedly deducing according to the step 5 to reduce the number of conflicts and obtain an optimal maintenance operation scheme.
The specific steps of evaluating the equipment state in the step 5 are as follows: and (4) checking whether any two work ticket safety measure instructions applied during maintenance work need to change the state of a certain same boundary device or not according to the step 4 side conflict model, determining whether different instructions cause the conflict of the same boundary device or not, and if the two work tickets have inconsistent requirements on the state setting of the same boundary device, ensuring that the two work tickets have the possibility of conflict, and continuing the work of the other ticket only by stopping the certain ticket.
The specific steps for carrying out the isolation ticket type conflict assessment in the step 5 are as follows: and when confirming that a certain maintenance device applies for the isolation ticket, determining whether the device performs other types of ticket operation and conflicts or not according to the assignment in the main ticket conflict model in the step 4.
The conflict assessment of the object device and the boundary device in the step 5 comprises the following specific steps: if the situation exists, a conflict occurs, and a certain work ticket needs to be stopped.
The main equipment isolation ticket in the step 4 comprises 7 types including an isolation work isolation ticket W, a special test isolation ticket T, an intervention isolation ticket I, a use external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and a run isolation ticket O.
The instruction types in the step 4 comprise an isolation instruction, a test instruction and a suggestion instruction, and each type of instruction corresponds to the state of the equipment, wherein the isolation instruction comprises an isolation instruction LD, an isolation instruction LC and an isolation instruction LO, wherein the instruction LD represents disconnection/locking, and the instruction LC represents disconnection/locking; instruction LO indicates open/lock; the test instruction comprises a test instruction D, a test instruction C, a test instruction I and a test instruction O, wherein the instruction D represents disconnection/occupation, the instruction C represents closing/occupation, the instruction I represents pushing/occupation, and the instruction O represents opening/occupation; the suggested instructions include a suggested instruction D, a suggested instruction C, a suggested instruction I, and a suggested instruction O, wherein instruction D indicates open, instruction C indicates closed, instruction I indicates push, and instruction O indicates open.
The specific relationship between the instruction type and the device state in the step 6 is as follows: isolating instructions LD, LC, LO, the corresponding master control device may be XX; the test instructions O, D, C and LN are only XX corresponding to the main control equipment; the recommendation O, D, C, LN is not a master class device.
The corresponding relation between the isolation tickets of different types and the instruction types is specifically as follows: for three types of isolation tickets of a special test isolation ticket T, a special operation isolation ticket X and an external source isolation ticket R, the corresponding instruction types comprise an isolation instruction, a test instruction and a suggestion instruction; for three isolation tickets of an isolation work isolation ticket W, an administrative isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O, the corresponding instruction types are an isolation instruction and a suggestion instruction respectively; for the intervention isolation ticket I, the corresponding instruction category is the suggested instruction.
The step 1 specifically comprises:
establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base, performing information management on the power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base, establishing a related equipment information table, wherein the equipment information table comprises related information such as equipment codes, equipment names, equipment daily states, equipment current states, equipment positions and the like, and updating information in time; the device code is used as a unique identifier of the device, and the device state indicates whether the device has compatibility or not.
The step 2 specifically comprises:
common working steps and a safety measure instruction information base required by related equipment maintenance are established, a user can conveniently and quickly call the common working steps and the safety measure instruction information base, and meanwhile, the isolation safety measure instruction in the finished isolation ticket is subjected to instruction presetting for subsequent maintenance and isolation calling;
the preset work of the related equipment comprises the following steps: the system comprises an isolation ticket type, a WOT work order number, an isolation ticket number, a work classification, a centralized ticket fetching mode, a self-service mode, a main line identification, a device classification, a main and sub type, a work description, an instruction order type, a system number, a standby number, a factory building, a room number, an elevation, a start time and an end time;
the preset instructions of the related equipment comprise: machine group number, system number, device name/instruction content, device location, instruction sequence number, raw status, isolated status, instruction type, annotation instruction identification, inspector.
The specific steps of collecting the maintenance operation work order information in the step 3 are as follows:
and extracting the work order information which is already planned and approved and finishes scheduling from the existing production management system, wherein the work order information at least comprises the attribute contents of each field of maintenance equipment information, a work order number, work content, planned start time, planned completion time, isolation ticket number, isolation ticket type, work order preorder task number and work order postorder task number.
The main device isolation ticket conflict judgment specifically comprises the following steps:
the main equipment isolation ticket types comprise 7 types including an isolation work isolation ticket W, a special test isolation ticket T, an intervention isolation ticket I, a use external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and a running isolation ticket O, and the corresponding relation between the types of the isolation tickets on the main equipment and the conflict of the types of the isolation tickets to be processed is specifically as follows: when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is an isolation work isolation ticket W or an intervention isolation ticket I, the main equipment can process the compatible isolation work isolation ticket W and the intervention isolation ticket I but cannot process the special test isolation ticket T, use an external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O, and incompatible isolation work isolation tickets W and intervention isolation tickets I;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is a special test isolation ticket T or an external source isolation ticket R or a special operation isolation ticket X, the 7 types of isolation tickets of all the types cannot be processed on the main equipment;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is the administrative isolation ticket A, the main equipment can process other 6 types of isolation tickets except the administrative isolation ticket A;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main device is the operation isolation ticket O, all the 7 types of isolation tickets can be processed on the main device.
The specific step of performing the master device conflict judgment in the step 5 is as follows:
(1) determining whether the device is the boundary device of other devices which are isolating, and if so, canceling the application;
(2) determining whether the device is the main device which is being isolated, and if so, judging the compatibility of the type of the isolation ticket and the device state;
(3) and under the condition that the two steps are judged to be negative, the main equipment of the ticket is shown to be irrelevant to the existing isolation of the power plant, namely, the equipment does not have any isolation ticket, and the approval processing of the application ticket is carried out.
The specific step of determining the conflict of the boundary device in the step 5 is as follows: the border device is checked for compatibility with other border devices, and if so, the ticket is approved, and if not, the user can consider performing other processing operations.
The step 6 specifically comprises:
and (4) obtaining a deduction result according to the steps, obtaining a conflict work order task number, a conflict device number, a plan starting time and a plan finishing time, adjusting the work order time, the ticket type and a safety measure instruction, repeating the step (5) to carry out deduction, reducing the number of conflicts and obtaining an optimal maintenance operation scheme.
The invention has the following remarkable effects: the isolation deduction model and the assessment method can provide an optimal working scheme for the daily and overhaul periods of the power plant, and greatly reduce the problem of work delay or waiting caused by conflict of work tickets during the daily or overhaul period of the power plant, thereby avoiding possible overhaul work overdue risks and ensuring the safe and reliable operation of a unit during the daily or overhaul period of the power plant.
Detailed Description
An isolation deduction model and an evaluation method are provided, the method comprises the following steps:
step 1, establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base;
establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base, performing information management on the power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base, establishing a related equipment information table, wherein the equipment information table comprises related information such as equipment codes, equipment names, equipment daily states, equipment current states, equipment positions and the like, and updating information in time; the device code is used as a unique identifier of the device, and the device state represents whether the device has compatibility or not;
step 2, setting a preset command for equipment maintenance;
common working steps and a safety measure instruction information base required by related equipment maintenance are established, a user can conveniently and quickly call the common working steps and the safety measure instruction information base, and meanwhile, the isolation safety measure instruction in the finished isolation ticket is subjected to instruction presetting for subsequent maintenance and isolation calling;
the preset work of the related equipment comprises the following steps: the system comprises an isolation ticket type, a WOT work order number, an isolation ticket number, a work classification, a centralized ticket fetching mode, a self-service mode, a main line identification, a device classification, a main and sub type, a work description, an instruction order type, a system number, a standby number, a factory building, a room number, an elevation, a start time and an end time;
the preset instructions of the related equipment comprise: the system comprises a machine set number, a system number, an equipment name/instruction content, an equipment position, an instruction sequence number, an original state, an isolation state, an instruction type, an annotation instruction identifier and a checker;
step 3, collecting maintenance operation work order information;
extracting work order information which is planned and approved and finishes scheduling from the existing production management system, wherein the work order information at least comprises maintenance equipment information, a work order number, work content, planned start time, planned completion time, an isolation ticket number, an isolation ticket type, a work order preorder task number and each field attribute content of a work order postorder task number;
step 4, establishing an equipment state conflict matrix model;
step 4.1, establishing a main ticket conflict model of the main equipment;
aiming at main equipment for maintenance and operation of a power plant, establishing a main equipment matrix type main ticket conflict model by taking a main equipment prior isolation ticket type as a longitudinal axis and a main equipment subsequent isolation ticket type as a transverse axis, wherein the main ticket conflict model can assign values to elements in the matrix according to actual conditions to determine whether conflicts are generated between two kinds of previous isolation tickets or not, for example, the main equipment isolation ticket types comprise 7 types which are respectively an isolation work isolation ticket W, a special test isolation ticket T, an intervention isolation ticket I, an external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, a political isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O; the main master ticket conflict model including the 7 types of isolation tickets is assigned with the value shown in table 1:
TABLE 1 Master Ticket Conflict model configuration
| W (rear) | T (rear) | I (rear) | R (rear) | X (rear) | A (rear) | O (rear) | |
| W (first) | ○ | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| T (first) | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| I (first) | ○ | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| R (first) | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| X (first) | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| A (first) | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ |
| O (first) | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Wherein, the collision is represented by ●, and the non-collision is represented by O; for example, the ordinate R (first) and the abscissa X (last) in table 1 correspond to ●, which indicates that the master device conflicts between the previous foreign ticket R and the subsequent special job ticket X; other conflict situations can be obtained from table 1;
step 4.2, establishing an edge collision model of the boundary equipment;
for the power plant maintenance operation boundary equipment, establishing a matrix type edge conflict model of the boundary equipment by taking a prior instruction type as a vertical axis and an instruction type as a horizontal axis, assigning values to the edge conflict model according to the combination of the two instruction types, and determining whether conflict is generated or conflict prompt is formed between the two instruction types, wherein the instruction types comprise an isolation instruction, a test instruction and a suggestion instruction, and the instruction of each type corresponds to the state of the equipment; for example, the isolation instructions include an isolation instruction LD, an isolation instruction LC, and an isolation instruction LO, where instruction LD represents disconnect/lock and instruction LC represents close/lock; instruction LO indicates open/lock; the test instruction comprises a test instruction D, a test instruction C, a test instruction I and a test instruction O, wherein the instruction D represents disconnection/occupation, the instruction C represents closing/occupation, the instruction I represents pushing/occupation, and the instruction O represents opening/occupation; the suggested instructions comprise a suggested instruction D, a suggested instruction C, a suggested instruction I and a suggested instruction O, wherein the instruction D represents disconnection, the instruction C represents closing, the instruction I represents pushing, and the instruction O represents opening; the edge-edge collision model assignments for the above 3 classes of 11 instruction types are shown in table 2:
TABLE 2 edge Conflict matrix model configuration
In table 2, collision is represented by ●, non-collision is represented by o, and collision indication is represented by x; there is a conflict with any combination of instructions, whether preceding or following the trial instruction in table 2; the two-by-two combination conflict assignments of the 11 instructions can be directly obtained from the table 2;
the specific relationship between each instruction type and the equipment state is as follows: isolation commands LD (open/lock), LC (close/lock), LO (open/lock), and the corresponding master device may be XX (Just hang the brand) (ii) a Test instructions o. (open/engage), d. (open/engage), c. (close/engage), LN (neutral/lock), the corresponding master control device may only be XX (only (open/engage))Just hang the brand) (ii) a Suggesting instructions O (open), D (open), C (close), LN (neutral point/lock), which cannot be the master control device;
the correspondence between the different types of isolation tickets and the instruction types is specifically as follows: for three types of isolation tickets of a special test isolation ticket T, a special operation isolation ticket X and an external source isolation ticket R, the corresponding instruction types comprise an isolation instruction, a test instruction and a suggestion instruction; for three isolation tickets of an isolation work isolation ticket W, an administrative isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O, the corresponding instruction types are an isolation instruction and a suggestion instruction respectively; for the intervention isolation ticket I, the corresponding instruction category is a suggested instruction;
step 5, carrying out isolation deduction evaluation;
taking a maintenance operation work plan as a time axis, performing simulation deduction on the whole work maintenance process, and performing conflict evaluation from three dimensions of equipment state conflict, isolation ticket type conflict and object equipment and boundary equipment conflict according to an equipment state uniqueness principle, wherein the equipment state conflict evaluation specifically comprises the steps of checking whether any two work ticket safety measure instructions applied during maintenance work need to change the state of a certain same boundary equipment or not for a certain time node, determining whether different instructions cause the conflict of the same boundary equipment or not according to a side conflict model, and if the state setting requirements of the two work tickets on the same boundary equipment are inconsistent, determining that the two work tickets have the possibility of conflict, and continuing the work of the other ticket only by stopping the certain ticket; the isolation ticket type conflict assessment specifically comprises the steps that when a certain maintenance device is confirmed to apply for an isolation ticket, whether conflict exists when the device performs other types of ticket operation is determined according to assignment in a main ticket conflict model; the conflict evaluation of the object equipment and the boundary equipment is to specifically check whether the same equipment exists as the object equipment or the boundary equipment, if so, conflict is generated, and a certain work ticket needs to be stopped;
specifically, when 7 types of isolation tickets for the main equipment include an isolation work isolation ticket W, a special test isolation ticket T, an intervention isolation ticket I, an external source isolation ticket R, a special work isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket a and an operation isolation ticket O, the corresponding relationship between the types of isolation tickets existing on the main equipment and the conflict of the types of isolation tickets to be processed is as follows:
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is an isolation work isolation ticket W or an intervention isolation ticket I, the main equipment can process the compatible isolation work isolation ticket W and the intervention isolation ticket I but cannot process the special test isolation ticket T, use an external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O, and incompatible isolation work isolation tickets W and intervention isolation tickets I;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is a special test isolation ticket T or an external source isolation ticket R or a special operation isolation ticket X, the 7 types of isolation tickets of all the types cannot be processed on the main equipment;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is the administrative isolation ticket A, the main equipment can process other 6 types of isolation tickets except the administrative isolation ticket A;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is the operation isolation ticket O, all the 7 types of isolation tickets can be processed on the main equipment;
the conflict judgment of the main device comprises the following specific steps:
(1) determining whether the device is the boundary device of other devices which are isolating, and if so, canceling the application;
(2) determining whether the device is the main device which is being isolated, and if so, judging the compatibility of the type of the isolation ticket and the device state;
(3) if the two steps are judged to be negative, the main equipment of the ticket is not related to the existing isolation of the power plant, namely, the equipment does not have any isolation ticket, and the approval processing of the application ticket can be carried out;
the collision judgment of the boundary device specifically includes: checking whether the boundary equipment is compatible with other boundary equipment, if so, indicating that the ticket can be approved, and if not, considering other processing operations by the user;
step 6, adjusting a work order information base according to the equipment conflict assessment result, and repeatedly deducing according to the step 5 to reduce the number of conflicts and obtain an optimal maintenance operation scheme;
and (4) obtaining a deduction result according to the steps, obtaining a conflict work order task number, a conflict device number, a plan starting time and a plan finishing time, adjusting the work order time, the ticket type and a safety measure instruction, repeating the step (5) to carry out deduction, reducing the number of conflicts and obtaining an optimal maintenance operation scheme.
Claims (15)
1. An isolation deduction model and an evaluation method are characterized in that: the method specifically comprises the following steps:
step 1, establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base;
step 2, setting a preset command for equipment maintenance;
step 3, collecting maintenance operation work order information;
step 4, establishing an equipment state conflict matrix model;
step 4.1, establishing a main ticket conflict model of the main equipment;
aiming at main equipment for maintenance and operation of a power plant, establishing a main equipment matrix type main ticket conflict model by taking a main equipment previous isolation ticket type as a longitudinal axis and a main equipment subsequent isolation ticket type as a transverse axis, wherein the main equipment matrix type main ticket conflict model can assign values to elements in a matrix according to actual conditions and clearly determines whether conflicts are generated between two successive isolation tickets or not;
step 4.2, establishing an edge collision model of the boundary equipment;
for the power plant maintenance operation boundary equipment, establishing a matrix type edge conflict model of the boundary equipment by taking the prior instruction type as a vertical axis and the instruction type as a horizontal axis, and assigning values to the edge conflict model according to the combination of the two instruction types in sequence to determine whether conflict is generated or conflict prompt is formed between the two instruction types in sequence;
step 5, carrying out isolation deduction evaluation;
taking a maintenance operation work plan as a time axis, carrying out simulation deduction on the whole work maintenance process, and carrying out conflict evaluation from three dimensions of equipment state conflict, isolation ticket type conflict and object equipment and boundary equipment conflict according to an equipment state uniqueness principle;
and 6, adjusting the work order information base according to the equipment conflict evaluation result, and repeatedly deducing according to the step 5 to reduce the number of conflicts and obtain an optimal maintenance operation scheme.
2. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the specific steps of evaluating the equipment state in the step 5 are as follows: and (4) checking whether any two work ticket safety measure instructions applied during maintenance work need to change the state of a certain same boundary device or not according to the step 4 side conflict model, determining whether different instructions cause the conflict of the same boundary device or not, and if the two work tickets have inconsistent requirements on the state setting of the same boundary device, ensuring that the two work tickets have the possibility of conflict, and continuing the work of the other ticket only by stopping the certain ticket.
3. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the specific steps for carrying out the isolation ticket type conflict assessment in the step 5 are as follows: and when confirming that a certain maintenance device applies for the isolation ticket, determining whether the device performs other types of ticket operation and conflicts or not according to the assignment in the main ticket conflict model in the step 4.
4. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the conflict assessment of the object device and the boundary device in the step 5 comprises the following specific steps: if the situation exists, a conflict occurs, and a certain work ticket needs to be stopped.
5. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the main equipment isolation ticket in the step 4 comprises 7 types including an isolation work isolation ticket W, a special test isolation ticket T, an intervention isolation ticket I, a use external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and a run isolation ticket O.
6. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the instruction types in the step 4 comprise an isolation instruction, a test instruction and a suggestion instruction, and each type of instruction corresponds to the state of the equipment, wherein the isolation instruction comprises an isolation instruction LD, an isolation instruction LC and an isolation instruction LO, wherein the instruction LD represents disconnection/locking, and the instruction LC represents disconnection/locking; instruction LO indicates open/lock; the test instruction comprises a test instruction D, a test instruction C, a test instruction I and a test instruction O, wherein the instruction D represents disconnection/occupation, the instruction C represents closing/occupation, the instruction I represents pushing/occupation, and the instruction O represents opening/occupation; the suggested instructions include a suggested instruction D, a suggested instruction C, a suggested instruction I, and a suggested instruction O, wherein instruction D indicates open, instruction C indicates closed, instruction I indicates push, and instruction O indicates open.
7. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the specific relationship between the instruction type and the device state in the step 6 is as follows: isolating instructions LD, LC, LO, the corresponding master control device may be XX; the test instructions O, D, C and LN are only XX corresponding to the main control equipment; the recommendation O, D, C, LN is not a master class device.
8. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 5, wherein: the corresponding relation between the isolation tickets of different types and the instruction types is specifically as follows: for three types of isolation tickets of a special test isolation ticket T, a special operation isolation ticket X and an external source isolation ticket R, the corresponding instruction types comprise an isolation instruction, a test instruction and a suggestion instruction; for three isolation tickets of an isolation work isolation ticket W, an administrative isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O, the corresponding instruction types are an isolation instruction and a suggestion instruction respectively; for the intervention isolation ticket I, the corresponding instruction category is the suggested instruction.
9. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the step 1 specifically comprises:
establishing a power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base, performing information management on the power plant maintenance operation related equipment information base, establishing a related equipment information table, wherein the equipment information table comprises related information such as equipment codes, equipment names, equipment daily states, equipment current states, equipment positions and the like, and updating information in time; the device code is used as a unique identifier of the device, and the device state indicates whether the device has compatibility or not.
10. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the step 2 specifically comprises:
common working steps and a safety measure instruction information base required by related equipment maintenance are established, a user can conveniently and quickly call the common working steps and the safety measure instruction information base, and meanwhile, the isolation safety measure instruction in the finished isolation ticket is subjected to instruction presetting for subsequent maintenance and isolation calling;
the preset work of the related equipment comprises the following steps: the system comprises an isolation ticket type, a WOT work order number, an isolation ticket number, a work classification, a centralized ticket fetching mode, a self-service mode, a main line identification, a device classification, a main and sub type, a work description, an instruction order type, a system number, a standby number, a factory building, a room number, an elevation, a start time and an end time;
the preset instructions of the related equipment comprise: machine group number, system number, device name/instruction content, device location, instruction sequence number, raw status, isolated status, instruction type, annotation instruction identification, inspector.
11. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the specific steps of collecting the maintenance operation work order information in the step 3 are as follows:
and extracting the work order information which is already planned and approved and finishes scheduling from the existing production management system, wherein the work order information at least comprises the attribute contents of each field of maintenance equipment information, a work order number, work content, planned start time, planned completion time, isolation ticket number, isolation ticket type, work order preorder task number and work order postorder task number.
12. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 3, wherein: the main device isolation ticket conflict judgment specifically comprises the following steps:
the main equipment isolation ticket types comprise 7 types including an isolation work isolation ticket W, a special test isolation ticket T, an intervention isolation ticket I, a use external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and a running isolation ticket O, and the corresponding relation between the types of the isolation tickets on the main equipment and the conflict of the types of the isolation tickets to be processed is specifically as follows: when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is an isolation work isolation ticket W or an intervention isolation ticket I, the main equipment can process the compatible isolation work isolation ticket W and the intervention isolation ticket I but cannot process the special test isolation ticket T, use an external source isolation ticket R, a special operation isolation ticket X, an administrative isolation ticket A and an operation isolation ticket O, and incompatible isolation work isolation tickets W and intervention isolation tickets I;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is a special test isolation ticket T or an external source isolation ticket R or a special operation isolation ticket X, the 7 types of isolation tickets of all the types cannot be processed on the main equipment;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main equipment is the administrative isolation ticket A, the main equipment can process other 6 types of isolation tickets except the administrative isolation ticket A;
when the existing isolation ticket of the main device is the operation isolation ticket O, all the 7 types of isolation tickets can be processed on the main device.
13. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the specific step of performing the master device conflict judgment in the step 5 is as follows:
(1) determining whether the device is the boundary device of other devices which are isolating, and if so, canceling the application;
(2) determining whether the device is the main device which is being isolated, and if so, judging the compatibility of the type of the isolation ticket and the device state;
(3) and under the condition that the two steps are judged to be negative, the main equipment of the ticket is shown to be irrelevant to the existing isolation of the power plant, namely, the equipment does not have any isolation ticket, and the approval processing of the application ticket is carried out.
14. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the specific step of determining the conflict of the boundary device in the step 5 is as follows: the border device is checked for compatibility with other border devices, and if so, the ticket is approved, and if not, the user can consider performing other processing operations.
15. The isolation deduction model and assessment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the step 6 specifically comprises:
and (4) obtaining a deduction result according to the steps, obtaining a conflict work order task number, a conflict device number, a plan starting time and a plan finishing time, adjusting the work order time, the ticket type and a safety measure instruction, repeating the step (5) to carry out deduction, reducing the number of conflicts and obtaining an optimal maintenance operation scheme.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910777960.1A CN112434838B (en) | 2019-08-22 | 2019-08-22 | Isolation deduction model and evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910777960.1A CN112434838B (en) | 2019-08-22 | 2019-08-22 | Isolation deduction model and evaluation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112434838A true CN112434838A (en) | 2021-03-02 |
| CN112434838B CN112434838B (en) | 2023-07-18 |
Family
ID=74689771
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910777960.1A Active CN112434838B (en) | 2019-08-22 | 2019-08-22 | Isolation deduction model and evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112434838B (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113111967A (en) * | 2021-04-30 | 2021-07-13 | 中核武汉核电运行技术股份有限公司 | Isolation deduction method and device for nuclear power station problem equipment |
| CN114386925A (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2022-04-22 | 中核核电运行管理有限公司 | Isolation conflict mediation method and device for nuclear power plant |
| CN115050124A (en) * | 2021-03-09 | 2022-09-13 | 核动力运行研究所 | Method and system for processing main ticket and sub ticket of nuclear power isolation license |
| CN115098626A (en) * | 2022-06-10 | 2022-09-23 | 中核核电运行管理有限公司 | Accurate matching method for nuclear power plant isolation information |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004070917A (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2004-03-04 | Konica Minolta Holdings Inc | Work management system, work management method, and work management program |
| JP2006163954A (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-22 | Canon Finetech Inc | Conflict guide display method and program |
| CN102915479A (en) * | 2012-09-25 | 2013-02-06 | 陕西陕煤黄陵矿业有限公司 | Power plant asset management system |
| US20140040913A1 (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2014-02-06 | Andreas Wuttke | Job plan verification |
| CN103631227A (en) * | 2013-11-26 | 2014-03-12 | 中国广核集团有限公司 | Isolation method and isolation system |
| CN104240152A (en) * | 2014-09-15 | 2014-12-24 | 陈慧超 | Power plant equipment on-line state and configuration state management system |
| CN104347131A (en) * | 2013-08-01 | 2015-02-11 | 中广核工程有限公司 | Nuclear power station driving command execution method and system |
| US9906398B1 (en) * | 2013-03-11 | 2018-02-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Remote management of device settings |
| CN109242231A (en) * | 2017-07-10 | 2019-01-18 | 菜鸟智能物流控股有限公司 | Scheduling method of energy consumption equipment and related equipment |
| CN109389291A (en) * | 2018-09-12 | 2019-02-26 | 江苏核电有限公司 | A kind of nuclear power station debugging test operation and maintenance activity distribution system |
| CN109982330A (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2019-07-05 | 海能达通信股份有限公司 | Frequency spectrum resource dispatching method and device |
-
2019
- 2019-08-22 CN CN201910777960.1A patent/CN112434838B/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004070917A (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2004-03-04 | Konica Minolta Holdings Inc | Work management system, work management method, and work management program |
| JP2006163954A (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-22 | Canon Finetech Inc | Conflict guide display method and program |
| US20140040913A1 (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2014-02-06 | Andreas Wuttke | Job plan verification |
| CN102915479A (en) * | 2012-09-25 | 2013-02-06 | 陕西陕煤黄陵矿业有限公司 | Power plant asset management system |
| US9906398B1 (en) * | 2013-03-11 | 2018-02-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Remote management of device settings |
| CN104347131A (en) * | 2013-08-01 | 2015-02-11 | 中广核工程有限公司 | Nuclear power station driving command execution method and system |
| CN103631227A (en) * | 2013-11-26 | 2014-03-12 | 中国广核集团有限公司 | Isolation method and isolation system |
| CN104240152A (en) * | 2014-09-15 | 2014-12-24 | 陈慧超 | Power plant equipment on-line state and configuration state management system |
| CN109242231A (en) * | 2017-07-10 | 2019-01-18 | 菜鸟智能物流控股有限公司 | Scheduling method of energy consumption equipment and related equipment |
| CN109982330A (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2019-07-05 | 海能达通信股份有限公司 | Frequency spectrum resource dispatching method and device |
| CN109389291A (en) * | 2018-09-12 | 2019-02-26 | 江苏核电有限公司 | A kind of nuclear power station debugging test operation and maintenance activity distribution system |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 云子;: "海南核电大修准备之项目及时间控制管理", 设备管理与维修, no. 2 * |
| 徐家树;覃征;叶志强;: "核电站设备的辅助隔离", 哈尔滨工业大学学报, no. 08 * |
| 王刚;: "一体化电厂资源管理系统中设备和人身安全管理", 电力信息化, no. 07 * |
| 邓肖田田;: "核能发电企业ERP信息化集成平台的建设", 信息与电脑(理论版), no. 14 * |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115050124A (en) * | 2021-03-09 | 2022-09-13 | 核动力运行研究所 | Method and system for processing main ticket and sub ticket of nuclear power isolation license |
| CN115050124B (en) * | 2021-03-09 | 2024-01-12 | 核动力运行研究所 | Nuclear power isolation license main sub-ticket processing method and system |
| CN113111967A (en) * | 2021-04-30 | 2021-07-13 | 中核武汉核电运行技术股份有限公司 | Isolation deduction method and device for nuclear power station problem equipment |
| CN114386925A (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2022-04-22 | 中核核电运行管理有限公司 | Isolation conflict mediation method and device for nuclear power plant |
| CN115098626A (en) * | 2022-06-10 | 2022-09-23 | 中核核电运行管理有限公司 | Accurate matching method for nuclear power plant isolation information |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112434838B (en) | 2023-07-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN112434838A (en) | Isolation deduction model and evaluation method | |
| CN103745293B (en) | A kind of RCM analysis methods | |
| CN104851052A (en) | Intelligent error preventing method and system used for outputting dispatching operation ticket | |
| CN112258065A (en) | Method, device and equipment for determining maintenance and dispatching sequence | |
| CN114418538A (en) | Operation and maintenance work order processing method and device | |
| CN110704700B (en) | One-key sequence control equipment state intelligent simulation method based on expert knowledge rule base | |
| CN112527778B (en) | Abnormal defect elimination management system and method based on abnormal information database increment | |
| CN107085416B (en) | Feedback control method and system for station bad information | |
| CN106557839B (en) | Equipment maintenance strategy optimization method and system based on big data | |
| CN110782145B (en) | Power dispatching plan decision making system, method and equipment | |
| WO2004070498A2 (en) | System and method for controlling jobs of a production device | |
| CN108879661B (en) | Method and equipment for checking switching operation through correlation history ticket | |
| CN115577708A (en) | Automatic order dispatching method for maintenance operation of heating ventilation terminal equipment based on NLP | |
| JP7160503B2 (en) | Building information processing equipment | |
| CN112434079A (en) | Secondary equipment abnormity discrimination decision method and device based on big data | |
| JP2021068010A (en) | Plan generation system construction support device, and plan generation system construction support method | |
| CN111199460A (en) | Power grid dispatching and maintenance application form processing method and system | |
| Costa et al. | Improving procedures for production and maintenance control towards industry 4.0 implementation | |
| Shimada | Development of Environment for Logical Process Safety Management Based on the Business Process Model | |
| CN108596341A (en) | A kind of method for diagnosing faults based on expert system | |
| CN115826506B (en) | Water treatment control system and control device | |
| CN113672647B (en) | Planned power outage specification verification method and device | |
| CN118114910A (en) | Intelligent factory management method based on big data analysis | |
| CN115796827A (en) | Distribution and recovery method for electric power overhaul tool | |
| Li et al. | The Research on Auto-Assignment Method of Service Orders Based on Rule Reasoning |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |