CN112328920A - Label authentication method, labeling method and respective devices - Google Patents
Label authentication method, labeling method and respective devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112328920A CN112328920A CN202011230807.6A CN202011230807A CN112328920A CN 112328920 A CN112328920 A CN 112328920A CN 202011230807 A CN202011230807 A CN 202011230807A CN 112328920 A CN112328920 A CN 112328920A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- label
- user
- tag
- authentication
- information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 55
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001149 cognitive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004984 smart glass Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/955—Retrieval from the web using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL]
- G06F16/9562—Bookmark management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/958—Organisation or management of web site content, e.g. publishing, maintaining pages or automatic linking
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The embodiment of the specification provides a tag authentication method, a labeling method and respective devices, wherein the tag authentication method comprises the following steps: responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication; receiving feedback of the second user for the tag; calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback; and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
Description
Technical Field
The embodiment of the specification relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to a label authentication method and a label labeling method. One or more embodiments of the present specification also relate to a label authentication apparatus, a label labeling method, a computing device, and a computer-readable storage medium.
Background
With the popularization and development of the internet, more and more users browse information on the internet. To enable users to obtain critical information more quickly, labels for the information have come to mind. For example, some enterprises have tags on the network that represent characteristics of those enterprises. Currently, the tagging of information on network platforms is mainly derived from official certification. For example, some enterprises have a "high and new technology industry" label defined by the country.
Although the official channel authenticated label has authority, the official channel authenticated label is difficult to represent the cognition of most users, and the difficulty of understanding information by the general public is increased.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, the embodiments of the present specification provide a tag authentication method and a tag labeling method. One or more embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a label authentication apparatus, a label labeling apparatus, a computing device, and a computer-readable storage medium, so as to solve technical deficiencies in the prior art.
According to a first aspect of embodiments of the present specification, there is provided a tag authentication method including: responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication; receiving feedback of the second user for the tag; calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback; and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
Optionally, the method further comprises: judging whether the first user is a user passing user level authentication; if not, performing user level authentication on the first user; and in the case that the user level authentication is passed, setting a weight for calculating the label score according to the level of the first user, and/or setting a range for participating in authentication of a second user according to the level of the first user, wherein the higher the level, the greater the weight, the higher the level, the greater the range of the second user.
Optionally, the sending, in response to the first user setting a tag for the first information, a message for setting the tag for the first information to a second user participating in authentication includes: setting a tag for the first information in response to a first user, and judging whether the tag is a tag selected from an official tag library or a user-defined tag; if the label is selected from the official label library, entering the step of sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication; if the label is a user-defined label, checking the label according to a preset label checking rule; and if the verification is passed, entering the step of sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication.
Optionally, the calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback includes: under the condition that the feedback is used for representing approval of the label, increasing the label score of the label according to a preset score value-added rule; and in the case that the feedback is used for representing objection to the label, reducing the label score of the label according to a preset score reduction rule.
Optionally, the tag has a corresponding validity period. The judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score comprises the following steps: and under the condition that the label is in the validity period, judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
Optionally, the determining, according to the tag score, whether the tag passes user authentication includes: judging whether the label score meets a preset authentication requirement or not; if the label score reaches a preset authentication requirement, triggering a preset manual review process; and determining that the tag passes the user authentication under the condition that the preset manual auditing process passes the auditing.
Optionally, the method further comprises: under the condition that the tag is a user-defined tag, correspondingly adding the first information and the tag to a user-defined tag library and setting the tag to be in a user authentication state, wherein the tag in the user-defined tag library, which belongs to the user authentication state, is visible to the second user and invisible to other users; and under the condition that the tag is determined to pass the user authentication, setting the state of the tag in a user-defined tag library as a user authentication passing state, wherein the tag belonging to the user authentication passing state in the user-defined tag library is visible for the second user and other users.
Optionally, the method further comprises: and under the condition that the label is determined to pass the user authentication, when a network platform displays the first information, displaying the label marked by the first information.
According to a second aspect of embodiments of the present specification, there is provided a tag authentication apparatus including: and the label message sending module is configured to respond to the first user setting the label for the first information and send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication. A feedback message receiving module configured to receive feedback of the second user for the tag. A tag score calculation module configured to calculate a tag score for the tag based on the feedback. And the user authentication judging module is configured to judge whether the label passes the user authentication according to the label score.
According to a third aspect of the embodiments of the present specification, there is provided a tag labeling method applied to a client, including: providing a label setting inlet on an interface of the client; responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score; and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
According to a fourth aspect of the embodiments of the present specification, there is provided a label labeling apparatus configured at a client, including: a tab entry module configured to provide a tab settings entry at an interface of the client. The label setting module is configured to respond to the situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, send a corresponding label setting message to a server side, enable the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication through the label setting message, receive feedback of the second user for the label, calculate the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judge whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score. A tag display module configured to display the tag labeled for the first information when the first information is displayed on an interface.
According to a fifth aspect of embodiments herein, there is provided a label labeling system, comprising: a first client configured to provide a tab setting portal at an interface of the client; responding to a label set for the first information by the user through the label set inlet, and sending a corresponding label set message to the server; and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information. The server side is configured to respond to the received label setting message, send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receive feedback of the second user for the label, calculate the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judge whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score. The second client is configured to respond to the received message which is sent by the server and used for setting the label for the first information, and the label marked for the first information is displayed on an interface; and responding to the feedback of the second user for the label, and sending the feedback to the server.
According to a sixth aspect of embodiments herein, there is provided a computing device comprising: a memory and a processor; the memory is to store computer-executable instructions, and the processor is to execute the computer-executable instructions to: responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication; receiving feedback of the second user for the tag; calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback; and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
According to a seventh aspect of embodiments herein, there is provided a computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the tag authentication method according to any of the embodiments herein.
According to an eighth aspect of embodiments herein, there is provided a computing device comprising: a memory and a processor; the memory is to store computer-executable instructions, and the processor is to execute the computer-executable instructions to: providing a label setting inlet at the interface; responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score; and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
According to a ninth aspect of embodiments herein, there is provided a computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the label labeling method according to any of the embodiments herein.
One embodiment of the present specification provides a tag authentication method, where in response to a first user setting a tag for first information, the method sends a message for setting the tag for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receives feedback of the second user for the tag, and calculates a tag score of the tag according to the feedback, so as to determine whether the tag passes user authentication or not according to the tag score. Therefore, the user authentication is carried out according to the label score, the recognition degree of the common public for matching the information and the label can be represented, the label authenticated by the user is a label easier to understand by the common public, and the difficulty in understanding the information by the common public can be reduced.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a tag authentication method provided in an embodiment of the present specification;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a tag authentication method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a tag authentication device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a tag authentication device according to another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a label labeling method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of a label labeling apparatus according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a label labeling system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 8 is a block diagram of a computing device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present description. This description may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein, as those skilled in the art will be able to make and use the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
The terminology used in the description of the one or more embodiments is for the purpose of describing the particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the description of the one or more embodiments. As used in one or more embodiments of the present specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It should also be understood that the term "and/or" as used in one or more embodiments of the present specification refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein in one or more embodiments to describe various information, these information should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one type of information from another. For example, a first can also be referred to as a second and, similarly, a second can also be referred to as a first without departing from the scope of one or more embodiments of the present description. The word "if" as used herein may be interpreted as "at … …" or "when … …" or "in response to a determination", depending on the context.
First, the noun terms to which one or more embodiments of the present specification relate are explained.
Labels, symbols representing some characteristic of the information, such as words and phrases, etc.
In the present specification, a label authentication method and a label labeling method are provided, and the present specification relates to a label authentication apparatus, a label labeling apparatus, a computing device, and a computer-readable storage medium, which are described in detail one by one in the following embodiments.
Fig. 1 shows a flowchart of a tag authentication method provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, which includes steps 102 to 108.
Step 102: and responding to the first user to set the label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication.
The range of the second user participating in the authentication may be set according to the implementation environment requirement, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present specification. For example, assuming that the first user is a user of instant messaging software, the tag authentication method may be applied to a server side of the instant messaging software, and when the first user sets a tag for the first information in a friend circle of the instant messaging software, a friend in the friend circle of the first user may be used as a second user. For another example, assuming that the first user is a user in a microblog, the tag authentication method may be applied to a server side of the microblog website, and when the first user sets a tag for the first information in the microblog, the microblog user who pays attention to the first user may be used as the second user.
Step 104: receiving feedback of the second user for the tag.
For example, the feedback may include: messages for indicating approval, messages for indicating objection, messages for indicating disinterest, and the like.
Step 106: and calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present specification, a specific manner of calculating the label score according to the feedback is not limited, and all the received feedback of the second user may be converted into corresponding parameters according to the implementation environment requirements, and participate in calculation in a formula preset with other related parameters, weights, operation relationships, and the like. For example, in a case where the feedback is used to indicate approval for the tag, the tag score of the tag may be increased according to a preset score increment rule; in the case where the feedback is used to indicate an objection to the label, the label score of the label may be reduced according to a preset score reduction rule. For example, the preset score increment rule is: under the condition that the feedback indicates approval, the score corresponding to the feedback is positive, and the preset score reduction rule is as follows: in the case that the feedback indicates objection, the score corresponding to the feedback is negative, so that the label score can be obtained by accumulating the scores corresponding to all the received feedbacks.
Step 108: and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
The specific judgment condition of the user authentication can be set according to the requirement of the implementation environment. For example, a tag score threshold may be preset, and a tag may be considered to pass user authentication when the calculated tag score meets or exceeds the tag score threshold. For another example, a determination condition having a plurality of parameters may be set by integrating other related factors, and the label score may be determined as one of the parameters in the determination condition. For example, in an embodiment of the present specification, it may be determined whether the label score meets a preset authentication requirement; if the label score reaches a preset authentication requirement, triggering a preset manual review process; and determining that the tag passes the user authentication under the condition that the preset manual auditing process passes the auditing. In the embodiment, the cognitive degree of the ordinary public can be reflected through the label value, the label can be further audited at an official angle through a preset manual auditing process, and the label authenticated by the user can meet the general cognitive degree of the user and the authority of the authentication.
The method responds to the situation that a first user sets a label for first information, sends a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receives feedback of the second user for the label, and calculates the label score of the label according to the feedback, so that whether the label passes user authentication or not can be judged according to the label score. Therefore, the user authentication is carried out according to the label score, the recognition degree of the common public for matching the information and the label can be represented, the label authenticated by the user is a label easier to understand by the common public, and the difficulty in understanding the information by the common public can be reduced.
It is understood that, in the case that the tag is determined to pass the user authentication, the tag labeled with the first information may be presented when the first information is presented by the network platform. For example, the tag authentication method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be applied to authentication and tagging of enterprise tags, where a common user tags an enterprise, and displays a corresponding tag for the enterprise after a tag score calculated according to feedback of other users reaches a standard, so as to display an unofficial tag for the user and the enterprise, and reflect an image of the enterprise from the perspective of the masses.
In view of the difference between user influences, the acceptance degree of the labels set by the user by the general public also differs, and therefore in one or more embodiments of the present specification, different user grades are further set according to the factors of the credit, industry understanding, network influence and the like of the user, and the factors of the user grades are involved in label authentication, so that the label scores show the influence of the user. Specifically, the method provided by the embodiment of the present specification may further include: judging whether the first user is a user passing user level authentication; if not, performing user level authentication on the first user; and in the case that the user level authentication is passed, setting a weight for calculating the label score according to the level of the first user, and/or setting a range for participating in authentication of a second user according to the level of the first user, wherein the higher the level, the greater the weight, the higher the level, the greater the range of the second user.
The specific way of the weight participating in the calculation of the label score is not limited, and the effect of enabling the label score to show the influence of the user can be achieved as long as the weight for calculating the label score is set based on the grade of the user and the calculation result of the label score is influenced by the weight correspondingly. For example, the formula for calculating the label score may be: the label score is equal to the weight corresponding to the first user's rank multiplied by the sum of the scores corresponding to all the second user's feedback. With this equation, the higher the rank, the higher the weight, the higher the calculated label score.
The specific way in which the weight participates in setting the second user range is not limited. For example, it is assumed that a first user is a user of the instant messaging software, a range of a second user corresponding to a certain user level is friends and circles of the first user, and a range of a second user corresponding to a level higher than the user level may include friends and circles of the first user and users that can accept advertisement promotion in the instant messaging software platform. For another example, assume that a first user is a user in the microblog, a range of a second user corresponding to a certain user level is a user who pays attention to the microblog of the first user, and a range of a second user corresponding to a level higher than the user level may include a user who pays attention to the microblog of the first user and other users who pay attention to the first information or related information.
In order to facilitate setting a tag for a user, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, the sending a message for setting the tag for the first information to a second user participating in authentication in response to the first user setting the tag for the first information includes: setting a tag for the first information in response to a first user, and judging whether the tag is a tag selected from an official tag library or a user-defined tag; if the label is selected from the official label library, entering the step of sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication; if the label is a user-defined label, checking the label according to a preset label checking rule; and if the verification is passed, entering the step of sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication.
For example, the preset tag audit rule may include: and checking whether the validity of the label content includes sensitive words violating the network platform specification language, whether the label meets the text format requirement and the like, and checking the association relation between the label content and the first information basically.
In the embodiment, the official tag library is set so that the user can select the tags of the official channels, the user is allowed to set the self-defined tags, and the legality of the tags is checked, so that the user can select the tags provided by the official channels or the self-defined tags as required, the difficulty of setting the tags by the user is reduced, the two tags can be authenticated in a user feedback mode, the tags passing the authentication can represent the approval of the ordinary public, and the difficulty of understanding the information by the ordinary public is reduced.
In order to avoid excessive occupation of resources such as a network and guarantee the effectiveness of feedback, in one or more embodiments of the present description, the tag has a corresponding validity period. The judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score comprises the following steps: and under the condition that the label is in the validity period, judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score. For example, the validity period corresponding to the tag may be a period of one week or two weeks, and when the tag is set to exceed one week or two weeks, it is considered that the tag feedback has been basically collected, and the influence of continuous collection on the authentication result is not great, but excessive occupation of resources such as a network may be caused. For example, in an implementation environment, for a first user, the validity period corresponding to a tag may be represented in the following form: the label of the label by the first user has an effective labeling period, and when the effective labeling period is exceeded, the label is invalid and cannot be seen by other users, but the first user of the label creator can still view the label set by the first user.
In order to effectively manage the user-defined tag after the user sets the user-defined tag and before the authentication is finished, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, the first information and the tag may be correspondingly added to a user-defined tag library and set to a user authentication state in the case that the tag is the user-defined tag, where the tag belonging to the user authentication state in the user-defined tag library is visible to the second user and invisible to other users; and under the condition that the tag is determined to pass the user authentication, setting the state of the tag in a user-defined tag library as a user authentication passing state, wherein the tag belonging to the user authentication passing state in the user-defined tag library is visible for the second user and other users. In the embodiment, the range of the visible user of the user-defined tag is distinguished through two states of the user authentication middle state and the user authentication passing state in the user-defined tag library, so that more selectable ranges are provided for setting tags for other users, and other users can select the visible tag from the user-defined tag library to label information. If the other users select the user-defined tags which are already approved by the tag auditing rules, the step of sending the message for setting the tags to the users participating in the authentication can be directly entered to start a new round of user authentication.
The tag authentication method provided in the present specification is further described below with reference to fig. 2, taking the application of the tag authentication method in an enterprise tag as an example. Fig. 2 shows a flowchart of a processing procedure of a tag authentication method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, and specific steps include step 202 to step 224.
Step 202: and judging whether the first user is the user passing the user level authentication.
Step 204: if not, performing user-level authentication on the first user.
For example, the user-level authentication mode may be set according to the implementation environment requirements, and for example, authentication may be performed according to authentication information input by the user.
Step 206: and judging whether the first user passes the user level authentication.
If not, then a return may be made to step 204 to continue user-level authentication of the first user.
For example, the first user may be required to enter new authentication information for authentication.
Step 208: if the user level authentication is passed, it is determined whether the first user selects a tag from an official tag library.
If so, step 216 is entered.
Step 210: and if not, receiving a user-defined label set for the enterprise information by the first user.
Step 212: and judging whether the user-defined label is a label which passes the preset label auditing rule.
For example, the review in this step may be a review of whether the relationship between the tag and the enterprise is reasonably matched, whether the tag is legal, or the like.
If the user-defined tab passes the audit, step 216 is entered.
Step 214: and if the label is not the label which is audited according to the preset label audit rule, auditing the user-defined label set by the first user according to the preset label audit rule.
If the audit is passed, step 216 is entered.
Step 216: and sending a message for setting the label for the enterprise information to a second user participating in authentication.
In combination with one or more of the above embodiments, the tags may have a corresponding expiration date. According to the corresponding validity period of the label, the labeling process of the label is of a labeling period, when the labeling period is exceeded, the label is invalid and cannot be seen by other users, but the creator of the label can also view the label of the creator.
Step 218: receiving feedback of the second user for the tag.
Step 220: and calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback.
Step 222: and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
In an embodiment, when the score of the tag reaches a preset score, manual review may be further performed, and when the manual review also passes, it is indicated that the tag matches the enterprise information, so as to determine that the user authentication passes.
Step 224: and under the condition that the label is determined to pass the user authentication, when the network platform displays the enterprise information, displaying the label marked by the enterprise information.
For example, in this embodiment, an official enterprise tag library may be pre-constructed, in which some enterprise tags that have been recognized by the public and expected to be labeled by users may be pre-stored, such as "high new technology enterprise", "2020 nethong corporation", and the like. The official enterprise tag library can be a tag source when a user marks an enterprise, and the user can also apply for a custom tag. After the user-defined tag is approved, the user-defined tag can enter a tag library for marking and using by users in the whole network. When the user marks the enterprise, official grade authentication can be performed firstly, and different grades can influence the weight of the label marked by the user, namely the weight for calculating the score of the label. When the label value marked by a user for a certain enterprise reaches the approved value, manual review can be performed, and all users can see the labels of the enterprise after user authentication after the review is passed.
In combination with one or more of the above embodiments, the user-defined tab in step 210 may be in either of two states. One state is that the user authentication is passed, if the user self-defined label passed by the user authentication can be seen by all users, the other state is failed, if the user self-defined label is failed, part of the users can see the label, and when the feedback of the part of the users is given back, the label score exceeds the preset score, a manual review stage is carried out, so that the user authentication is completed.
In step 220, the user may feed back any or all of two types of information, one is whether the tag is reasonable, and the other is whether the tag is matched with the enterprise. For example, for the official label "2020 Ten size Red company", since it is already the official label, it can be determined that it is reasonable, so the user can only feed back whether the label matches the business information.
According to the embodiment, the common user marks the label for the enterprise, after the score of the label marked for the enterprise by the user reaches the standard, the label subjected to user authentication is displayed for the user and the enterprise, the image of the enterprise is reflected from the perspective of the masses, and the difficulty in understanding the enterprise information by the masses can be reduced.
Corresponding to the above method embodiment, the present specification further provides a tag authentication apparatus embodiment, and fig. 3 shows a schematic structural diagram of a tag authentication apparatus provided in an embodiment of the present specification. As shown in fig. 3, the apparatus includes: a tag message sending module 302, a feedback message receiving module 304, a tag score calculating module 306, and a user authentication judging module 308.
The tag message sending module 302 may be configured to send a message to a second user participating in authentication, in response to the first user setting a tag for the first information, the message setting the tag for the first information.
The feedback message receiving module 304 may be configured to receive feedback of the second user for the tag.
The tag score calculation module 306 may be configured to calculate a tag score for the tag based on the feedback.
The user authentication determining module 308 may be configured to determine whether the tag passes the user authentication according to the tag score.
Therefore, the device responds to the situation that the first user sets the label for the first information, sends the message for setting the label for the first information to the second user participating in authentication, receives the feedback of the second user for the label, and calculates the label score of the label according to the feedback, so that whether the label passes the user authentication or not can be judged according to the label score. The device sets up the label for the information by ordinary user, calculates the label score based on the feedback of the user of participating in the authentication, is equivalent to the rationality based on the angle reflection label of masses cognition, consequently, carries out user authentication according to the label score, can represent the general masses to the approved degree of information and label matching, and the label through user authentication is the label that is easier to ordinary masses to understand, can reduce the understanding degree of ordinary masses to the information.
Fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram illustrating a tag authentication apparatus according to another embodiment of the present disclosure. In view of the difference between the influences of the users, the labels set by the users may also have difference in the acceptance degree of the common people, and therefore, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, as shown in fig. 4, the label authentication apparatus may further include: a user level judging module 310, a user level authenticating module 312 and a parameter setting module 314.
The user level determination module 310 may be configured to determine whether the first user is a user authenticated by a user level.
The user level authentication module 312 may be configured to perform user level authentication on the first user if the user level determination module 310 determines that the user level authentication is negative.
The parameter setting module 314 may be configured to set a weight for calculating the label score according to the rank of the first user and/or set a range for a second user participating in authentication according to the rank of the first user, where the higher the rank is, the greater the weight is, the higher the rank is, the greater the range for the second user is.
In order to facilitate setting a tag by a user, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, as shown in fig. 4, the tag message sending module 302 may include: a tag type judging sub-module 3022, an official tag message sending sub-module 3024, a user tag auditing sub-module 3026, and a user tag message sending sub-module 3028.
The tag type determination submodule 3022 may be configured to determine whether the tag is a tag selected from an official tag library or a user-defined tag in response to the first user setting the tag for the first information.
The official tag message transmitting sub-module 3024 may be configured to enter the step of transmitting a message setting the tag for the first information to the second user participating in the authentication if the tag type judgment sub-module 3022 judges that it is the official tag selected from the official tag library.
The user tag auditing submodule 3026 may be configured to audit the tag according to a preset tag auditing rule if the tag type determining submodule 3022 determines that the tag is a user-defined tag.
The user tag message sending sub-module 3028 may be configured to enter the step of sending a message for setting the tag for the first information to the second user participating in the authentication if the user tag audit sub-module 3026 passes the audit.
In the embodiment, the official tag library is set so that the user can select the tags of the official channels, the user is allowed to set the self-defined tags, and the legality of the tags is checked, so that the user can select the tags provided by the official channels or the self-defined tags as required, the difficulty of setting the tags by the user is reduced, the two tags can be authenticated in a user feedback mode, the tags passing the authentication can represent the approval of the ordinary public, and the difficulty of understanding the information by the ordinary public is reduced.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present specification, a specific manner of calculating the label score according to the feedback is not limited, and all the received feedback of the second user may be converted into corresponding parameters according to the implementation environment requirements, and participate in calculation in a formula preset with other related parameters, weights, operation relationships, and the like. For example, the tag score calculation module 306 may include: the tag score increasing submodule 3062 may be configured to increase the tag score of the tag according to a preset score increment rule, if the feedback is used to indicate approval for the tag. The tag score reduction sub-module 3064 may be configured to reduce the tag score of the tag according to a preset score reduction rule if the feedback is used to indicate an objection to the tag.
In order to avoid excessive occupation of resources such as a network and guarantee the effectiveness of feedback, in one or more embodiments of the present description, the tag has a corresponding validity period. As shown in fig. 4, the user authentication determination module 308 may be configured to determine whether the tag is authenticated by the user according to the tag score if the tag is within the validity period.
In order to effectively manage the user-defined tag after the user sets the user-defined tag and before the authentication is finished, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, as shown in fig. 4, the tag authentication apparatus may further include: the user tag storage module 316 may be configured to, when the tag is a user-defined tag, correspondingly add the first information and the tag to a user-defined tag library and set the user-defined tag library to be in a user authentication state, where the tag in the user-defined tag library that belongs to the user authentication state is visible to the second user and is invisible to other users. The authentication pass setting module 318 may be configured to, in a case where it is determined that the tag is a tag that passes user authentication, set a state of the tag in a user-defined tag library, in which tags belonging to a user authentication pass state are visible to the second user and other users, as a user authentication pass state.
In the embodiments of the present specification, the specific determination condition that passes the user authentication may be set according to the requirements of the implementation environment. For example, a tag score threshold may simply be preset, and a tag is considered to be authenticated by the user when the calculated tag score meets or exceeds the tag score threshold. For another example, a determination condition having a plurality of parameters may be set by integrating other related factors, and the label score may be determined as one of the parameters in the determination condition. For example, as shown in fig. 4, the user authentication determining module 308 may include: score judging submodule 3082, manual review submodule 3084 and authentication passing submodule 3086.
The score determining sub-module 3082 may be configured to determine whether the tag score meets a preset authentication requirement.
The manual review submodule 3084 may be configured to trigger a preset manual review process if the tag score meets a preset certification requirement.
The authentication passing sub-module 3086 may be configured to determine that the tag passes the user authentication if the preset manual review process passes the review.
In one or more embodiments of the present specification, as shown in fig. 4, the tag authentication apparatus may further include: the tag presentation module 320 may be configured to present the tag labeled with the first information when the network platform presents the first information if the tag determines that the user authentication is passed. For example, the tag authentication device provided in the embodiments of the present description may be applied to authentication and labeling of enterprise tags, where a common user labels an enterprise, and displays a corresponding tag for the enterprise after a tag score calculated according to feedback of other users reaches a standard, so as to display an unofficial tag for the user and the enterprise, and reflect an image of the enterprise from the perspective of the masses.
The above is a schematic scheme of a tag authentication apparatus of the present embodiment. It should be noted that the technical solution of the tag authentication apparatus and the technical solution of the tag authentication method described above belong to the same concept, and for details that are not described in detail in the technical solution of the tag authentication apparatus, reference may be made to the description of the technical solution of the tag authentication method described above.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a label labeling method that may be applied to a client according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, including steps 502 to 506.
Step 502: and providing a label setting inlet on the interface of the client.
Step 504: responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score.
Step 506: and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
Therefore, according to the tag labeling method provided by the embodiment of the specification, a user can set a tag at a client, so that a server sends a corresponding message to other users to participate in authentication, the score of the tag is calculated based on the feedback of the user participating in the authentication, which is equivalent to reflecting the reasonability of the tag based on the cognition of the masses, and the tag labeled by the user can reflect the characteristics of the information from the cognition of the masses.
Corresponding to the above method embodiment, the present specification further provides an embodiment of a label labeling device configured at a client, and fig. 6 shows a schematic structural diagram of the label labeling device provided in an embodiment of the present specification. As shown in fig. 6, the apparatus includes: a label entry module 602, a label setup module 604, and a label display module 606.
The tab entry module 602 may be configured to provide a tab setting entry at the client interface.
The tag setting module 604 may be configured to, in response to a user setting a tag for first information through the tag setting entry, send a corresponding tag setting message to a server, where the tag setting message enables the server to send a message for setting the tag for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receive feedback of the second user for the tag, calculate a tag score of the tag according to the feedback, and determine whether the tag passes user authentication or not according to the tag score.
The tag presentation module 606 may be configured to present the tag labeled for the first information when the first information is presented on the interface.
The above is a schematic scheme of a label labeling apparatus of this embodiment. It should be noted that the technical solution of the label labeling apparatus and the technical solution of the label labeling method belong to the same concept, and details that are not described in detail in the technical solution of the label labeling apparatus can be referred to the description of the technical solution of the label labeling method.
Fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram illustrating a label labeling system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As shown in fig. 7, the label labeling system may include: a first client 702, a server 704, and a second client 706.
The first client 702 may be configured to provide a tab setting portal at an interface of the client; responding to a label set for the first information by the user through the label set inlet, and sending a corresponding label set message to the server; and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
The server 704 may be configured to, in response to receiving the tag setting message, send a message for setting the tag for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receive feedback of the second user for the tag, calculate a tag score of the tag according to the feedback, and determine whether the tag passes user authentication or not according to the tag score.
The second client 706 may be configured to, in response to receiving the message sent by the server and used for setting the tag for the first information, display the tag labeled for the first information on an interface; and responding to the feedback of the second user for the label, and sending the feedback to the server.
The second client 706 may include a plurality of second clients as shown in fig. 7, corresponding to the scope of the second user participating in the authentication.
The server side of the system responds to the situation that the first user sets the label for the first information, sends the information for setting the label for the first information to the second user participating in authentication, receives the feedback of the second user for the label, and calculates the label score of the label according to the feedback, so that whether the label passes the user authentication or not can be judged according to the label score. Therefore, the system sets the label for the information by the common user, calculates the label score based on the feedback of the user participating in authentication, and is equivalent to reflecting the reasonability of the label based on the cognition angle of the masses, so that the user authentication is performed according to the label score, the recognition degree of the common masses on the matching of the information and the label can be represented, the label authenticated by the user is a label easier to understand by the common masses, and the difficulty in understanding the information by the common masses can be reduced.
FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a computing device 800, according to one embodiment of the present description. The components of the computing device 800 include, but are not limited to, memory 810 and a processor 820. The processor 820 is coupled to the memory 810 via a bus 830, and the database 850 is used to store data.
Computing device 800 also includes access device 840, access device 840 enabling computing device 800 to communicate via one or more networks 860. Examples of such networks include the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), a Personal Area Network (PAN), or a combination of communication networks such as the internet. Access device 840 may include one or more of any type of network interface (e.g., a Network Interface Card (NIC)) whether wired or wireless, such as an IEEE802.11 Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) wireless interface, a worldwide interoperability for microwave access (Wi-MAX) interface, an ethernet interface, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface, a cellular network interface, a bluetooth interface, a Near Field Communication (NFC) interface, and so forth.
In one embodiment of the present description, the above-described components of computing device 800, as well as other components not shown in FIG. 8, may also be connected to each other, such as by a bus. It should be understood that the block diagram of the computing device architecture shown in FIG. 8 is for purposes of example only and is not limiting as to the scope of the description. Those skilled in the art may add or replace other components as desired.
Computing device 800 may be any type of stationary or mobile computing device, including a mobile computer or mobile computing device (e.g., tablet, personal digital assistant, laptop, notebook, netbook, etc.), a mobile phone (e.g., smartphone), a wearable computing device (e.g., smartwatch, smartglasses, etc.), or other type of mobile device, or a stationary computing device such as a desktop computer or PC. Computing device 800 may also be a mobile or stationary server.
In one aspect, processor 820 may be used to execute the following computer-executable instructions:
responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication;
receiving feedback of the second user for the tag;
calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback;
and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
The above is an illustrative scheme of a computing device of the present embodiment. It should be noted that the technical solution of the computing device and the technical solution of the tag authentication method belong to the same concept, and details that are not described in detail in the technical solution of the computing device can be referred to the description of the technical solution of the tag authentication method.
In another aspect, processor 820 may be used to execute the following computer-executable instructions:
providing a label setting inlet on an interface of a client;
responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score;
and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
The above is an illustrative scheme of a computing device of the present embodiment. It should be noted that the technical solution of the computing device and the technical solution of the label labeling method belong to the same concept, and details that are not described in detail in the technical solution of the computing device can be referred to the description of the technical solution of the label labeling method.
An embodiment of the present specification also provides a computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions that, when executed by a processor, are operable to:
responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication;
receiving feedback of the second user for the tag;
calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback;
and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
The above is an illustrative scheme of a computer-readable storage medium of the present embodiment. It should be noted that the technical solution of the storage medium belongs to the same concept as the technical solution of the above-mentioned tag authentication method, and details that are not described in detail in the technical solution of the storage medium can be referred to the description of the technical solution of the above-mentioned tag authentication method.
Another embodiment of the present specification also provides a computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions that, when executed by a processor, are to:
providing a label setting inlet on an interface of a client;
responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score;
and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
The above is an illustrative scheme of a computer-readable storage medium of the present embodiment. It should be noted that the technical solution of the storage medium and the technical solution of the label labeling method belong to the same concept, and details that are not described in detail in the technical solution of the storage medium can be referred to the description of the technical solution of the label labeling method.
The foregoing description has been directed to specific embodiments of this disclosure. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims may be performed in a different order than in the embodiments and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing may also be possible or may be advantageous.
The computer instructions comprise computer program code which may be in the form of source code, object code, an executable file or some intermediate form, or the like. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, usb disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, Read-Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier wave signals, telecommunications signals, software distribution medium, and the like. It should be noted that the computer readable medium may contain content that is subject to appropriate increase or decrease as required by legislation and patent practice in jurisdictions, for example, in some jurisdictions, computer readable media does not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunications signals as is required by legislation and patent practice.
It should be noted that, for the sake of simplicity, the foregoing method embodiments are described as a series of acts, but those skilled in the art should understand that the present embodiment is not limited by the described acts, because some steps may be performed in other sequences or simultaneously according to the present embodiment. Further, those skilled in the art should also appreciate that the embodiments described in this specification are preferred embodiments and that acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required for an embodiment of the specification.
In the above embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
The preferred embodiments of the present specification disclosed above are intended only to aid in the description of the specification. Alternative embodiments are not exhaustive and do not limit the invention to the precise embodiments described. Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the embodiments and the practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best understand and utilize the embodiments. The specification is limited only by the claims and their full scope and equivalents.
Claims (16)
1. A tag authentication method, comprising:
responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication;
receiving feedback of the second user for the tag;
calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback;
and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
judging whether the first user is a user passing user level authentication;
if not, performing user level authentication on the first user;
and in the case that the user level authentication is passed, setting a weight for calculating the label score according to the level of the first user, and/or setting a range for participating in authentication of a second user according to the level of the first user, wherein the higher the level, the greater the weight, the higher the level, the greater the range of the second user.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein responsive to the first user tagging the first information, sending a message to the second user participating in the authentication to tag the first information comprises:
setting a tag for the first information in response to a first user, and judging whether the tag is a tag selected from an official tag library or a user-defined tag;
if the label is selected from the official label library, entering the step of sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication;
if the label is a user-defined label, checking the label according to a preset label checking rule;
and if the verification is passed, entering the step of sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication.
4. The method of claim 1, the calculating, from the feedback, a label score for the label comprising:
under the condition that the feedback is used for representing approval of the label, increasing the label score of the label according to a preset score value-added rule;
and in the case that the feedback is used for representing objection to the label, reducing the label score of the label according to a preset score reduction rule.
5. The method of claim 1, the tag having a corresponding expiration date;
the judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score comprises the following steps:
and under the condition that the label is in the validity period, judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the tag is authenticated by the user according to the tag score comprises:
judging whether the label score meets a preset authentication requirement or not;
if the label score reaches a preset authentication requirement, triggering a preset manual review process;
and determining that the tag passes the user authentication under the condition that the preset manual auditing process passes the auditing.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
under the condition that the tag is a user-defined tag, correspondingly adding the first information and the tag to a user-defined tag library and setting the tag to be in a user authentication state, wherein the tag in the user-defined tag library, which belongs to the user authentication state, is visible to the second user and invisible to other users;
and under the condition that the tag is determined to pass the user authentication, setting the state of the tag in a user-defined tag library as a user authentication passing state, wherein the tag belonging to the user authentication passing state in the user-defined tag library is visible for the second user and other users.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
and under the condition that the label is determined to pass the user authentication, when a network platform displays the first information, displaying the label marked by the first information.
9. A tag authentication apparatus comprising:
a tag message transmission module configured to transmit a message for setting a tag for first information to a second user participating in authentication in response to the first user setting the tag for the first information;
a feedback message receiving module configured to receive feedback of the second user for the tag;
a tag score calculation module configured to calculate a tag score for the tag based on the feedback;
and the user authentication judging module is configured to judge whether the label passes the user authentication according to the label score.
10. A label labeling method is applied to a client and comprises the following steps:
providing a label setting inlet on an interface of the client;
responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score;
and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
11. A label labeling device configured at a client comprises:
a tag entry module configured to provide a tag setup entry at an interface of the client;
the label setting module is configured to respond to the situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, send a corresponding label setting message to a server side, enable the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication through the label setting message, receive feedback of the second user for the label, calculate the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judge whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score;
a tag display module configured to display the tag labeled for the first information when the first information is displayed on an interface.
12. A label tagging system comprising:
a first client configured to provide a tab setting portal at an interface of the client; responding to a label set for the first information by the user through the label set inlet, and sending a corresponding label set message to the server; displaying the label labeled for the first information when the first information is displayed on an interface;
the server side is configured to respond to the received label setting message, send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receive feedback of the second user for the label, calculate the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judge whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score;
the second client is configured to respond to the received message which is sent by the server and used for setting the label for the first information, and the label marked for the first information is displayed on an interface; and responding to the feedback of the second user for the label, and sending the feedback to the server.
13. A computing device, comprising:
a memory and a processor;
the memory is to store computer-executable instructions, and the processor is to execute the computer-executable instructions to:
responding to the first user to set a label for the first information, and sending a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication;
receiving feedback of the second user for the tag;
calculating a label score of the label according to the feedback;
and judging whether the label passes the user authentication or not according to the label score.
14. A computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, carry out the steps of the tag authentication method of any one of claims 1 to 8.
15. A computing device, comprising:
a memory and a processor;
the memory is to store computer-executable instructions, and the processor is to execute the computer-executable instructions to:
providing a label setting inlet at the interface;
responding to a situation that a user sets a label for first information through the label setting inlet, sending a corresponding label setting message to a server side, wherein the label setting message enables the server side to send a message for setting the label for the first information to a second user participating in authentication, receiving feedback of the second user for the label, calculating the label score of the label according to the feedback, and judging whether the label passes user authentication or not according to the label score;
and when the first information is displayed on an interface, displaying the label marked for the first information.
16. A computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, carry out the steps of the label labeling method of claim 10.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011230807.6A CN112328920A (en) | 2020-11-06 | 2020-11-06 | Label authentication method, labeling method and respective devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011230807.6A CN112328920A (en) | 2020-11-06 | 2020-11-06 | Label authentication method, labeling method and respective devices |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112328920A true CN112328920A (en) | 2021-02-05 |
Family
ID=74315668
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011230807.6A Pending CN112328920A (en) | 2020-11-06 | 2020-11-06 | Label authentication method, labeling method and respective devices |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112328920A (en) |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101174265A (en) * | 2006-11-04 | 2008-05-07 | 吴风勇 | Method for recording and estimating search action of users |
| EP1981242A2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2008-10-15 | Sun Microsystems Inc. | Method and system for securing a commercial grid network |
| CN101963966A (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2011-02-02 | 李占胜 | Method for sorting search results by adding labels into search results |
| WO2015014134A1 (en) * | 2013-08-02 | 2015-02-05 | 小米科技有限责任公司 | Methods and apparatuses for building tag library and searching for user |
| CN104731806A (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-24 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and terminal for quickly finding user information in social network |
| CN107491479A (en) * | 2017-07-05 | 2017-12-19 | 上海大学 | A kind of label management method based on ontology library |
| CN108881339A (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2018-11-23 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Push method, user tag generation method, device and equipment |
| CN110334202A (en) * | 2019-03-28 | 2019-10-15 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | User interest label construction method and relevant device based on news application software |
-
2020
- 2020-11-06 CN CN202011230807.6A patent/CN112328920A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101174265A (en) * | 2006-11-04 | 2008-05-07 | 吴风勇 | Method for recording and estimating search action of users |
| EP1981242A2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2008-10-15 | Sun Microsystems Inc. | Method and system for securing a commercial grid network |
| CN101963966A (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2011-02-02 | 李占胜 | Method for sorting search results by adding labels into search results |
| WO2015014134A1 (en) * | 2013-08-02 | 2015-02-05 | 小米科技有限责任公司 | Methods and apparatuses for building tag library and searching for user |
| CN104731806A (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-24 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and terminal for quickly finding user information in social network |
| CN108881339A (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2018-11-23 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Push method, user tag generation method, device and equipment |
| CN107491479A (en) * | 2017-07-05 | 2017-12-19 | 上海大学 | A kind of label management method based on ontology library |
| CN110334202A (en) * | 2019-03-28 | 2019-10-15 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | User interest label construction method and relevant device based on news application software |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107872772B (en) | Method and device for detecting fraud short messages | |
| Wong et al. | The right to data portability in practice: exploring the implications of the technologically neutral GDPR | |
| US20100057548A1 (en) | Targeted customer offers based on predictive analytics | |
| Wong et al. | How portable is portable? Exercising the GDPR's right to data portability | |
| WO2021057142A1 (en) | Credit-based interaction credit assessment method and apparatus | |
| CN107808346B (en) | Evaluation method and evaluation device for potential target object | |
| CN109685536B (en) | Method and apparatus for outputting information | |
| US20160180282A1 (en) | Systems and methods for crowdfunding and crowdsourcing a project | |
| CN112204610A (en) | Neural network based electronic content | |
| CN111985857A (en) | Auditing method and device | |
| US11470032B2 (en) | Method for recommending groups and related electronic device | |
| CN111127222B (en) | Business service processing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| KR20210105024A (en) | Server and method for providing user customized content produced by celebrity | |
| CN113221005B (en) | Customer service pushing method, server and related products | |
| US20190155851A1 (en) | Information filtering | |
| CN112000862B (en) | Data processing method and device | |
| EP3879418B1 (en) | Identity verification method and device | |
| CN112328920A (en) | Label authentication method, labeling method and respective devices | |
| CN112328937B (en) | Information delivery method and device | |
| CN111191901B (en) | Service processing method and device based on block chain | |
| CN109146464A (en) | A kind of auth method and device, a kind of calculating equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114757757A (en) | Wind control method | |
| US20180218334A1 (en) | Electronic Personal Networking System, Messaging Apparatus, and Persistent Introduction Process | |
| US8353008B2 (en) | Authentication detection | |
| CN111080451A (en) | Contract execution processing method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |