CN112070406A

CN112070406A - Equipment risk processing method and device for power transmission equipment and electronic device

Info

Publication number: CN112070406A
Application number: CN202010955359.XA
Authority: CN
Inventors: 杨博; 叶宽; 赵蕾; 谢欢; 朱戎; 李大志; 李洪斌; 周恺
Original assignee: State Grid Corp of China SGCC; State Grid Beijing Electric Power Co Ltd
Current assignee: State Grid Corp of China SGCC; State Grid Beijing Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-09-11
Filing date: 2020-09-11
Publication date: 2020-12-11
Anticipated expiration: 2040-09-11
Also published as: CN112070406B

Abstract

The invention discloses an equipment risk processing method and device for power transmission equipment and an electronic device. Wherein, the method comprises the following steps: acquiring influence factors of equipment risks of power transmission equipment, wherein the power transmission equipment comprises: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk; determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors; and determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level. The method and the device solve the technical problem that how to process equipment risks of the power transmission equipment cannot be determined in the prior art.

Description

Equipment risk processing method and device for power transmission equipment and electronic device

Technical Field

The invention relates to the field of data processing, in particular to a method and a device for processing equipment risk of power transmission equipment and an electronic device.

Background

With the development of economy, people have higher and higher power quality and increasingly increased power grid load, serious threats are caused to the safe and reliable operation of a power grid, how to comprehensively evaluate the influence factors of equipment risks of power transmission equipment, effectively avoid economic losses and social influences caused by power failure accidents, improve the safe reliability of the power grid equipment, and promote the working efficiency to become the development targets of various power grid enterprises.

In view of the above problems, no effective solution has been proposed.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for processing equipment risks of power transmission equipment and an electronic device, and at least solves the technical problem that how to process the equipment risks of the power transmission equipment cannot be determined in the prior art.

According to an aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided an equipment risk processing method for power transmission equipment, including: acquiring influence factors of equipment risks of power transmission equipment, wherein the power transmission equipment comprises: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk; determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors; and determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level.

Optionally, obtaining the influence factors of the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment includes at least one of: acquiring equipment running state information of the power transmission equipment; acquiring equipment defect and hidden danger information and equipment state evaluation information of the power transmission equipment; acquiring equipment historical state information of the power transmission equipment; acquiring equipment importance degree information of the power transmission equipment; and acquiring equipment management level information of the power transmission equipment.

Optionally, determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors includes: acquiring historical risk levels of the equipment risks of the power transmission equipment in a historical time period; acquiring the incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level; and determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relation.

Optionally, the obtaining a historical risk level of the power transmission equipment with the equipment risk in a historical time period includes: acquiring the frequency of the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment in the historical time period; acquiring a single risk grade of the equipment risk each time; determining the historical risk level based on the number and the single risk level.

Optionally, determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relationship includes: acquiring the voltage grade and the importance grade of the power transmission equipment; determining a first adjusting coefficient of the voltage grade and a second adjusting coefficient of the importance grade, wherein the first adjusting coefficient is used for adjusting voltage values of different grades, and the second adjusting coefficient is used for adjusting importance degrees of different power transmission equipment; and determining the current risk level according to the correlation, the first adjustment coefficient and the second adjustment coefficient.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided an equipment risk processing apparatus for power transmission equipment, including: an obtaining module, configured to obtain an influence factor of an equipment risk of a power transmission equipment, where the power transmission equipment includes: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk; the determining module is used for determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors; and the processing module is used for determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level.

Optionally, the determining module is further configured to obtain a historical risk level of the power transmission equipment when the equipment risk occurs in a historical time period; acquiring the incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level; and determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relation.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided a non-volatile storage medium storing a plurality of instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor and to execute the equipment risk processing method of the power transmission equipment of any item.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided a processor configured to execute a program, where the program is configured to execute any one of the above-described equipment risk processing methods of a power transmission apparatus when executed.

According to another aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided an electronic apparatus, including a memory in which a computer program is stored, and a processor configured to execute the computer program to perform the equipment risk processing method of any one of the above power transmission devices.

In an embodiment of the present invention, influence factors of equipment risk of power transmission equipment are obtained, where the power transmission equipment includes: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk; determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors; the risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level is determined, and the purpose of effectively determining the strategy for processing the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment is achieved, so that the technical effect of effectively processing the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment is achieved, and the technical problem that how to process the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment cannot be determined in the prior art is solved.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention without limiting the invention. In the drawings:

fig. 1 is a flowchart of an equipment risk processing method of a power transmission equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 2 is a flow chart of an alternative method of equipment risk handling of a power transmission equipment according to an embodiment of the invention;

fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an equipment risk processing device of a power transmission equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present invention and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

Example 1

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an embodiment of an equipment risk processing method for a power transmission equipment, it is noted that the steps illustrated in the flowchart of the drawings may be executed in a computer system such as a set of computer executable instructions, and that although a logical order is illustrated in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps illustrated or described may be executed in an order different from that herein.

Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an equipment risk processing method for a power transmission equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 1, the method includes the steps of:

step S102, obtaining influence factors of equipment risk of power transmission equipment, wherein the power transmission equipment comprises: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk;

step S104, determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors;

and step S106, determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level.

In an alternative embodiment, the influencing factor of the equipment risk refers to a factor influencing an equipment risk index, and optionally, as shown in fig. 2, the influencing factor mainly relates to at least one of the following: information reflecting the operating state of the equipment, information reflecting the health state of the equipment (facility), information reflecting the historical state of the equipment, information reflecting the degree of importance of the equipment, and information reflecting the management level of each unit equipment.

In an alternative embodiment, the factor of influence of equipment risk of the power transmission equipment is acquired, and the factor of influence comprises at least one of the following:

step S202, acquiring equipment running state information of the power transmission equipment;

step S204, acquiring equipment defect and hidden danger information and equipment state evaluation information of the power transmission equipment;

step S206, acquiring device history state information of the power transmission device;

step S208, acquiring equipment importance degree information of the power transmission equipment;

step S210 is to acquire device management level information of the power transmission device.

In the above alternative embodiment, as also shown in fig. 2, the influencing factor of the equipment risk index is mainly selected from at least one of the following: (1) information reflecting the operating state of the device, such as: load conditions, etc.; (2) information reflecting the health status of the equipment (facility), such as: equipment (facility) defect and equipment hidden trouble condition, equipment (facility) state evaluation result (including fire-fighting and technical and defense facilities); (3) information reflecting the historical status of the device, such as: faults and unplanned outage conditions of the equipment in the last year, and the operation life of the transformer substation and the transmission line; (4) information reflecting the degree of importance of the device, such as: voltage class of the device, degree of influence of device failure; (5) information reflecting the management level of each unit device, such as: the method comprises the following steps of evaluating the working development condition of equipment state, managing and discovering the defects, troubleshooting and managing the hidden dangers, implementing the management and control measures, searching and analyzing the faults and the like.

In an alternative embodiment, determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors includes:

step S302, acquiring historical risk levels of the equipment risks of the power transmission equipment in a historical time period;

step S304, acquiring the incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level;

step S306, determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relationship.

In the optional embodiment, historical risk levels of the power transmission equipment with the equipment risks in historical time periods are obtained; acquiring the incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level; and determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relation.

In an optional embodiment, obtaining a historical risk level of the power transmission equipment at which the equipment risk occurs in a historical time period includes:

step S402, acquiring the number of times that the power transmission equipment has the equipment risk in the historical time period;

step S406, obtaining a single risk grade of the equipment risk each time;

step S408, determining the historical risk level based on the number of times and the single risk level.

In the above optional embodiment, based on the number of times that the power transmission equipment has the equipment risk in the historical time period and a single risk level at which the equipment risk occurs each time, the historical risk level may be determined by taking an absolute value of the risk level according to the number of times based on a product of the number of times and the single risk level.

In an optional embodiment, determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relationship includes:

step S502, acquiring the voltage grade and the importance grade of the power transmission equipment;

step S504, determining a first adjustment coefficient of the voltage class and a second adjustment coefficient of the importance class, where the first adjustment coefficient is used for adjusting voltage values of different classes, and the second adjustment coefficient is used for adjusting importance degrees of different power transmission devices;

step S506, determining the current risk level according to the correlation, the first adjustment coefficient and the second adjustment coefficient.

As an alternative embodiment, the equipment risk index F of the substation_z＝(Z_f+Z_q+Z_y+Z_g+Z_p)×T_Z×T_D×T_N(ii) a Equipment risk index F for transmission lines_x＝(X_f+X_q+X_y+X_g+X_p)×T_Z×T_D×T_N(ii) a Wherein, F_z: a device risk index of the substation; f_x: equipment risk index of the transmission line; z_f: the main transformer load rate of the transformer substation (the same year in the last year); z_q: a substation equipment defect condition; z_y: potential danger conditions of substation equipment; z_g: a failure condition of equipment in the substation (within one year); z_p: evaluating the state of the substation equipment; x_f: transmission line load rate (last year synchronization); x_q: the defect condition of the transmission line body; x_y: the hidden danger condition of the power transmission line body; x_g: transmission line fault conditions (within one year); x_p: evaluating the state of the power transmission line; t is_Z: an importance degree adjustment coefficient; t is_D: a voltage level adjustment factor; t is_N: and adjusting the coefficient of the operating life.

As an alternative embodiment, the value criteria of the first alternative current risk level are shown in table 1 below:

TABLE 1

As an alternative embodiment, the value criteria of the first alternative adjustment coefficient are shown in table 2 below:

TABLE 2

As an alternative embodiment, the first alternative environmental risk current risk level judgment criteria is shown in table 3 below:

TABLE 3

In another alternative embodiment, the method for calculating the risk index of the equipment and the definition of the related parameters are as follows:

F_Pz＝(PZ_f+PZ_q+PZ_y+PZ_g+PZ_p)×T_Z；

F_Px＝(PX_f+PX_q+PX_y+PX_g+PX_p)×T_Z；

F_Pz: equipment risk index of the opening and closing station; f_Px: an equipment risk index for the distribution line; PZ_f: the main power supply load rate of the switching station (the same year in the last year); PZ_q: open and close station equipment defect conditions; PZ_y: open and close station equipment hidden danger conditions; PZ_g: failure of equipment in the switching station (within one year); PZ_p: evaluating the state of the switching station equipment; PX_f: distribution line load rate (year of year); PX_q: a distribution line body defect condition; PX_y: distribution line body hidden danger conditions; PX_g: distribution line fault conditions (within one year); PX_p: evaluating the state of the distribution line; t is_Z: the importance degree adjusts the coefficient.

As an alternative embodiment, the value criteria of the second current risk level are shown in table 4 below:

TABLE 4

As an alternative embodiment, the value standard of the second alternative adjustment coefficient is shown in table 5 below:

TABLE 5

As an alternative embodiment, the first alternative environmental risk current risk level judgment criteria is shown in table 6 below:

TABLE 6

F_s: unit equipment risk index (calculated by the ratio of the transformer substation, the transmission line, the switching station and the distribution line with risk to the total number of the power lines of the administration station of the unit); t is_G: a device management adjustment factor; z_ⅠThe number of transformer substation stations with I-level risk in the unit; z_ⅡThe number of transformer substation stations with class II risk in the unit; z_ⅢThe number of transformer substation stations with class III risk in the unit; z_ⅣThe number of transformer substation stations with IV-level risk in the unit; z_nThe total number of the transformer substation managed by the unit. X_Ⅰ: the number of the transmission lines with I-level risk in the unit is determined; x_Ⅱ: the number of the transmission lines with class II risk in the unit is determined; x_Ⅲ: the number of the transmission lines with class III risk in the unit is determined; x_Ⅳ: the number of transmission lines with IV-level risk in the unit is determined; x_nThe total number of the transmission lines administered by the unit.

PZ_ⅠOpening and closing station with class I risk for this unitCounting; PZ_ⅡThe number of open/close stations with class II risk in the unit; PZ_ⅢThe number of open/close stations with class III risk in the unit; PZ_ⅣThe number of open/close stations with IV-level risk in the unit; PZ_nThe total number of stations of the switching station administered by the unit.

PX_Ⅰ: the number of distribution lines with I-level risk in the unit is the number of the distribution lines; PX_Ⅱ: the number of distribution lines with class II risk in the unit is the number of the distribution lines with class II risk; PX_Ⅲ: the number of distribution lines with class III risk in the unit is shown; PX_Ⅳ: the number of distribution lines with IV-level risks in the unit is shown; PX_nThe total number of distribution lines administered by the unit.

In an alternative embodiment, the adjustment coefficient value criterion for device management may be calculated by the following formula and the specific definition shown in table 7:

T_G＝(T_G1+T_G2+T_G3+T_G4+T_G5)；

TABLE 7

As an alternative embodiment, the judgment criteria for the current risk level of the third alternative environmental risk are shown in table 8 below:

TABLE 8

As an optional embodiment, for the load rate case, determining a risk handling policy corresponding to the D risk level: 1. defining the responsible person of the team related to the unit as the responsible person for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the equipment is specially patrolled every two weeks, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the patrolling quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented.

As an optional embodiment, for the load rate case, determining a risk handling policy corresponding to the C risk level: 1. the person responsible for the department of operation and inspection of the unit is determined to be the person responsible for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, equipment special inspection is added once every week, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented.

As an optional embodiment, for the load rate case, determining a risk handling policy corresponding to the B risk level: 1. the main and auxiliary main authorities of the main pipe of the unit operation and inspection department are determined to be responsible persons for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added every three days, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (modification) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. and negotiating a load optimization scheme and an emergency treatment scheme with a scheduling department.

As an optional embodiment, for the load rate case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the a risk level is determined: 1. the main responsibility of the unit operation and inspection department is determined as the responsible person for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the equipment is specially patrolled once every day, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the patrolling quality is improved, and the transformer station arranges personnel to watch when necessary; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (modification) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. and negotiating a load optimization scheme and an emergency disposal scheme with a dispatching department, and performing emergency disposal linkage drilling.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the D risk level is determined: 1. defining the responsible person of the team related to the unit as the responsible person for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the equipment is specially patrolled every two weeks, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the patrolling quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented; 5. the spare parts of the vulnerable equipment are supplemented in time by combining the defect processing condition of the equipment; 6. performing state evaluation analysis on key equipment, and organizing defect elimination work by combining an annual power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan; 7. the security guard can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for the defective parts of the fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place for the control.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the C risk level is determined: 1. the person responsible for the department of operation and inspection of the unit is determined to be the person responsible for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, defining differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit, and defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, equipment special inspection is added once per week, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented; 5. the spare parts of the vulnerable equipment are supplemented in time by combining the defect processing condition of the equipment; 6. performing state evaluation analysis on key equipment, and organizing defect elimination work by combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan; 7. the security guard can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for the defective parts of the fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place for the control.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the B risk level is determined: 1. the main and auxiliary main authorities of the main pipe of the unit operation and inspection department are determined to be responsible persons for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added every three days, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (modification) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. the spare parts of the vulnerable equipment are supplemented in time by combining the defect processing condition of the equipment; 6. performing evaluation and analysis on the state of key equipment, and arranging a temporary power failure plan or combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan according to the degree of urgency and weakness to organize defect elimination work; 7. the security guard strengthens the special patrol and patrols the defective parts of the fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place for the prevention and the control once every 1 hour; 8. and negotiating with a scheduling department to optimize the emergency disposal scheme.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the a risk level is determined: 1. the main responsibility of the unit operation and inspection department is determined as the responsible person for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, defining differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the monitoring of the operation of key equipment is enhanced, the special inspection of the equipment is added once every day, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the inspection quality is improved, and the transformer station arranges personnel to watch when necessary; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (modification) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. the spare parts of the vulnerable equipment are supplemented in time by combining the defect processing condition of the equipment; 6. performing evaluation and analysis on the state of key equipment, and arranging a temporary power failure plan or combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan according to the degree of urgency and weakness to organize defect elimination work; 7. the security guard strengthens the special patrol and patrols the defective parts of the fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place for the prevention and the control once every 1 hour; 8. and negotiating with a dispatching department to optimize an emergency disposal scheme, and performing emergency disposal linkage drilling.

As an optional embodiment, for a hidden danger situation, a risk handling policy corresponding to the D risk level is determined: 1. defining the responsible person of the team related to the unit as the responsible person for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added every two weeks, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the inspection quality is improved, and the nursing to the hidden danger area is enhanced; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, care of hidden danger areas is enhanced, and the control is implemented strictly; 5. performing state evaluation analysis on key equipment, and organizing hidden danger elimination work by combining an annual power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan; 6. the security guard can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for the hidden trouble parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the C risk level is determined: 1. the person responsible for the department of operation and inspection of the unit is determined to be the person responsible for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, equipment special inspection is added once every week, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the inspection quality is improved, and the nursing to hidden danger areas is enhanced; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, care of hidden danger areas is enhanced, and the control is implemented strictly; 5. performing state evaluation analysis on key equipment, and organizing hidden danger elimination work by combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan; 6. the security guard can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for the hidden trouble parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the B risk level is determined: 1. the main and auxiliary main authorities of the main pipe of the unit operation and inspection department are determined to be responsible persons for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added every three days, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the sections with hidden dangers are subjected to continuous inspection, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated aiming at possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (transformation) operation process, and sections with hidden dangers are subjected to uninterrupted inspection and are strictly implemented; 5. performing evaluation and analysis on the state of key equipment, and arranging a temporary power failure plan or combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan according to the degree of urgency and the severity, and organizing and performing hidden danger elimination work; 6. the security guard strengthens the special patrol and patrols the hidden trouble parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place for the prevention and the control once every 1 hour; 7. and negotiating with a scheduling department to optimize the emergency disposal scheme.

As an alternative embodiment, for the defect case, the risk handling policy corresponding to the a risk level is determined: 1. the main responsibility of the unit operation and inspection department is determined as the responsible person for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the equipment is specially patrolled once every day, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the sections with hidden dangers are continuously patrolled, the patrolling quality is improved, and the transformer station arranges personnel to watch when necessary; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated aiming at possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (transformation) operation process, and sections with hidden dangers are subjected to uninterrupted inspection and are strictly implemented; 5. performing evaluation and analysis on the state of key equipment, and arranging a temporary power failure plan or combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan according to the degree of urgency and the severity, and organizing and performing hidden danger elimination work; 6. the security guard can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for the hidden trouble parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place. 7. Professional maintenance personnel of the fire-fighting facilities or operation monitoring and certified personnel on duty of the fire-fighting facilities are on duty within 24 hours of the station. 8. And negotiating with a dispatching department to optimize an emergency disposal scheme, and performing emergency disposal linkage drilling.

As an alternative embodiment, for the state evaluation situation, the risk processing policy corresponding to the D risk level is determined: 1. defining the responsible person of the team related to the unit as the responsible person for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the equipment is specially patrolled every two weeks, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the patrolling quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented; 5. combining the annual power failure plan and the equipment operation and maintenance work plan, organizing and making equipment state evaluation abnormal state elimination work; 6. the security personnel can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for key parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or parts with inadequate control.

As an alternative embodiment, for the state evaluation situation, the risk processing policy corresponding to the C risk level is determined: 1. the person responsible for the department of operation and inspection of the unit is determined to be the person responsible for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault disposal plan in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, equipment special inspection is added once every week, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented; 5. combining the monthly power failure plan and the equipment operation and maintenance work plan, organizing and making equipment state evaluation abnormal state elimination work; 6. the security personnel can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for key parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or parts with inadequate control.

As an alternative embodiment, for the state evaluation situation, the risk processing policy corresponding to the B risk level is determined: 1. the main and auxiliary main authorities of the main pipe of the unit operation and inspection department are determined to be responsible persons for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added every three days, the infrared temperature measurement, the charged detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (modification) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. according to the severity and urgency, arranging a temporary power failure plan or combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan, and organizing and making equipment state evaluation abnormal state elimination work; 6. the security personnel strengthen the special patrol and patrol the key parts of the fire-fighting and defense facilities or the parts which are not in place for 1 hour; 7. and negotiating with a scheduling department to optimize the emergency disposal scheme.

As an alternative embodiment, for the state evaluation situation, the risk processing policy corresponding to the a risk level is determined: 1. the main responsibility of the unit operation and inspection department is determined as the responsible person for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a key equipment fault emergency repair fault handling plan in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing a drill; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the equipment is specially patrolled once every day, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the patrolling quality is improved, and the transformer station arranges personnel to watch when necessary; 4. when major equipment carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (modification) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. according to the severity and urgency, arranging a temporary power failure plan or combining a monthly power failure plan and an equipment operation and maintenance work plan, and organizing and making equipment state evaluation abnormal state elimination work; 6. the security guard can carry out special patrol once every 1 hour for the hidden trouble parts of fire-fighting and technical facilities or the parts which are not in place. 7. Professional maintenance personnel of the fire-fighting facilities or operation monitoring and certified personnel on duty of the fire-fighting facilities are on duty within 24 hours of the station. 8. And negotiating with a dispatching department to optimize an emergency disposal scheme, and performing emergency disposal linkage drilling.

As an alternative embodiment, for the fault condition, the risk handling policy corresponding to the D risk level is determined: 1. defining the responsible person of the team related to the unit as the responsible person for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault rush-repair fault handling plan with faults in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment with faults is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added once every two weeks, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment with faults carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented; 5. preventive measures against failure, emergency control measures, and recovery measures are made and implemented.

As an optional embodiment, for the failure condition, determining a risk handling policy corresponding to the C risk level: 1. the person responsible for the department of operation and inspection of the unit is determined to be the person responsible for the management measures of equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair; 2. compiling a key equipment fault rush-repair fault handling plan with faults in advance, and determining related spare parts and emergency repair teams; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment with faults is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, equipment special inspection is added once a week, the infrared temperature measurement and the live detection of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment with faults carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, and the control measures are strictly implemented; 5. preventive measures against failure, emergency control measures, and recovery measures are made and implemented.

As an alternative embodiment, for the failure condition, the risk handling policy corresponding to the B risk level is determined: 1. the main and auxiliary main authorities of the main pipe of the unit operation and inspection department are determined to be responsible persons for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a fault handling plan for emergency repair of key equipment with faults in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing drilling; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment with faults is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, the special inspection of the equipment is added every three days, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, and the inspection quality is improved; 4. when major equipment with faults carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (transformation) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. preventive measures against failure, emergency control measures, and recovery measures are made and implemented. 6. And negotiating with a scheduling department to optimize the equipment fault emergency disposal scheme.

As an optional embodiment, for the failure condition, determining a risk handling policy corresponding to the a risk level: 1. the main responsibility of the unit operation and inspection department is determined as the responsible person for equipment operation and maintenance and emergency repair management measures; 2. compiling a fault handling plan for emergency repair of key equipment with faults in advance, defining related spare parts and emergency repair teams, and organizing drilling; 3. the operation monitoring of key equipment with faults is enhanced, the differentiated operation and maintenance control measures of the unit are clarified, equipment is specially patrolled once every day, the infrared temperature measurement, the live detection and the like of the equipment are enhanced, the patrolling quality is improved, and the transformer station arranges personnel on duty when necessary; 4. when major equipment with faults carries out equipment maintenance work, a maintenance process and quality control measures are determined, dangerous points existing in operation are analyzed, targeted and complete control measures are formulated, an emergency disposal scheme is formulated according to possible abnormity or faults in the maintenance (transformation) operation process, and the emergency disposal scheme is strictly implemented; 5. setting and implementing preventive measures, emergency control measures and recovery measures for preventing faults; 6. and negotiating with a dispatching department to optimize an equipment fault emergency disposal scheme, and performing emergency disposal linkage drilling.

According to the method and the device, the risk processing strategy of the current risk level of the equipment risk is determined based on the influence factors of the equipment risk, the information of the equipment operation, the equipment health, the historical state and the management level of each unit of equipment is accurately reflected, the basis is provided for the aspects of equipment state monitoring, maintenance, safe and stable operation and the like, the equipment safety management work can be conveniently carried out by each professional and each level of personnel, and the equipment is safely and effectively controlled.

Example 2

According to an embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus embodiment for implementing the equipment risk processing method for the power transmission equipment is further provided, fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an equipment risk processing apparatus for the power transmission equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 3, the equipment risk processing apparatus for the power transmission equipment includes: an acquisition module 30, a determination module 32 and a processing module 34, wherein:

an obtaining module 30, configured to obtain an influencing factor of an equipment risk of a power transmission equipment, where the power transmission equipment includes: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk; a determining module 32, configured to determine a current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factor; and a processing module 34, configured to determine a risk processing policy corresponding to the current risk level.

In an optional embodiment, the determining module is further configured to obtain a historical risk level of the power transmission equipment when the equipment risk occurs within a historical time period; acquiring the incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level; and determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the association relation.

It should be noted that the above modules may be implemented by software or hardware, for example, for the latter, the following may be implemented: the modules can be located in the same processor; alternatively, the modules may be located in different processors in any combination.

It should be noted here that the above-mentioned acquiring module 30, determining module 32 and processing module 34 correspond to steps S102 to S106 in embodiment 1, and the above-mentioned modules are the same as the examples and application scenarios realized by the corresponding steps, but are not limited to what is disclosed in embodiment 1 above. It should be noted that the modules described above may be implemented in a computer terminal as part of an apparatus.

It should be noted that, reference may be made to the relevant description in embodiment 1 for alternative or preferred embodiments of this embodiment, and details are not described here again.

The equipment risk processing device of the power transmission equipment may further include a processor and a memory, where the acquiring module 30, the determining module 32, the processing module 34, and the like are stored in the memory as program units, and the processor executes the program units stored in the memory to implement corresponding functions.

The processor comprises a kernel, and the kernel calls a corresponding program unit from the memory, wherein one or more than one kernel can be arranged. The memory may include volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or nonvolatile memory such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM), and the memory includes at least one memory chip.

According to the embodiment of the application, the embodiment of the nonvolatile storage medium is also provided. Optionally, in this embodiment, the nonvolatile storage medium includes a stored program, and the apparatus in which the nonvolatile storage medium is located is controlled to execute the apparatus risk processing method for the power transmission apparatus when the program runs.

Optionally, in this embodiment, the nonvolatile storage medium may be located in any one of a group of computer terminals in a computer network, or in any one of a group of mobile terminals, and the nonvolatile storage medium includes a stored program.

Optionally, the apparatus in which the non-volatile storage medium is controlled to perform the following functions when the program is executed: acquiring influence factors of equipment risks of power transmission equipment, wherein the power transmission equipment comprises: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk; determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors; and determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level.

According to the embodiment of the application, the embodiment of the processor is also provided. Optionally, in this embodiment, the processor is configured to execute a program, where the program executes the method for processing the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment.

An embodiment of the present application provides an electronic apparatus, which includes a memory and a processor, where the memory stores a computer program, and the processor is configured to execute the computer program to perform an equipment risk processing method for any one of the power transmission equipment.

The present application also provides a computer program product adapted to perform a program of initializing the steps of the apparatus risk handling method of any of the above-mentioned power transmission apparatuses, when executed on a data processing apparatus.

The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.

In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.

In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology can be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units may be a logical division, and in actual implementation, there may be another division, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, units or modules, and may be in an electrical or other form.

The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.

In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.

The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable non-volatile storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a non-volatile storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to perform all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned nonvolatile storage medium includes: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic or optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.

The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and decorations can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these modifications and decorations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. An equipment risk processing method for a power transmission equipment, comprising:

acquiring influence factors of equipment risk of power transmission equipment, wherein the power transmission equipment comprises: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk;

determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors;

and determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the obtaining of the impact factors of equipment risk of the power transmission equipment comprises at least one of:

acquiring equipment running state information of the power transmission equipment;

acquiring equipment defect and hidden danger information and equipment state evaluation information of the power transmission equipment;

acquiring equipment historical state information of the power transmission equipment;

acquiring equipment importance degree information of the power transmission equipment;

and acquiring equipment management level information of the power transmission equipment.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the current risk level of the equipment risk as a function of the influencing factors comprises:

acquiring historical risk levels of the equipment risks of the power transmission equipment in a historical time period;

acquiring an incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level;

and determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the incidence relation.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein obtaining a historical risk level for the power transmitting equipment at which the equipment risk occurred over a historical period of time comprises:

acquiring the number of times of occurrence of the equipment risk of the power transmission equipment in the historical time period;

obtaining a single risk level of each occurrence of the equipment risk;

determining the historical risk level based on the number of times and the single risk level.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein determining the current risk level of the equipment risk from the correlation comprises:

acquiring the voltage grade and the importance grade of the power transmission equipment;

determining a first adjusting coefficient of the voltage grade and a second adjusting coefficient of the importance grade, wherein the first adjusting coefficient is used for adjusting voltage values of different grades, and the second adjusting coefficient is used for adjusting importance degrees of different power transmission equipment;

and determining the current risk level according to the association relation and the first adjusting coefficient and the second adjusting coefficient.

6. An equipment risk processing apparatus of a power transmission equipment, comprising:

an obtaining module, configured to obtain an influence factor of an equipment risk of a power transmission equipment, where the power transmission equipment includes: the influence factors are used for reflecting factors influencing the equipment risk;

the determining module is used for determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the influence factors;

and the processing module is used for determining a risk processing strategy corresponding to the current risk level.

7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the determining module is further configured to obtain a historical risk level of the power transmission equipment at risk for the equipment during a historical time period; acquiring an incidence relation between the influence factors and the historical risk level; and determining the current risk level of the equipment risk according to the incidence relation.

8. A non-volatile storage medium, characterized in that it stores a plurality of instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor and to perform a method of equipment risk handling of a power transmission apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

9. A processor, characterized in that the processor is configured to execute a program, wherein the program is configured to execute the equipment risk processing method of the power transmission equipment according to any one of claims 1 to 5 when executed.

10. An electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor is configured to execute the computer program to perform the equipment risk processing method for a power transmitting equipment according to any one of claims 1 to 5.