CN111598418A

CN111598418A - Balance-based item sorting method, balance-based item sorting device, balance-based item sorting equipment and storage medium

Info

Publication number: CN111598418A
Application number: CN202010355387.8A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 蔡伟; 梁威
Original assignee: Thinvent Digital Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Thinvent Digital Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-04-29
Filing date: 2020-04-29
Publication date: 2020-08-28

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a balance-based item sorting method, a balance-based item sorting device, balance-based item sorting equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring project information of a plurality of projects to be sequenced; determining a plurality of evaluation dimensions of the project according to the project information; calculating the balance degree of each project according to the plurality of evaluation dimensions; and sorting the plurality of items according to the balance degree. In this way, the balance degree of the comprehensive multi-aspect evaluation dimension of the project can be obtained, and the obtained balance degree is a unique numerical value, so that the user can objectively and exactly measure the balance degree of the project. And sorting the items based on the balance degree, and displaying a sorting result, so that an analysis result of the balance degree of the items is displayed more intuitively.

Description

Balance-based item sorting method, balance-based item sorting device, balance-based item sorting equipment and storage medium

Technical Field

Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to the field of computer technology, and more particularly, to a method, apparatus, device, and storage medium for ranking items based on a degree of balance.

Background

With the development and popularization of software technology, project management software is deeply applied in the project industry. The factors such as resource allocation and importance of projects are balanced, and which project among projects is high in balance, and the projects are compared according to a single dimension, for example, investment projects are respectively sorted according to the dimensions such as industry importance, project capital expenditure amount or project period value, and then business personnel check each sorting result and subjectively determine the importance of different projects.

At present, the judgment of the project balance degree in a project group is mainly carried out by people, the influence of subjective judgment of experts is serious, and the result is often inaccurate.

Disclosure of Invention

According to the embodiment of the invention, a balance-based item sorting method, a balance-based item sorting device, a balance-based item sorting equipment and a storage medium are provided.

In a first aspect of the present invention, a method for ranking items based on a balance is provided, the method comprising:

acquiring project information of a plurality of projects to be sequenced;

determining a plurality of evaluation dimensions of the project according to the project information;

calculating the balance degree of each project according to the plurality of evaluation dimensions;

and sorting the plurality of items according to the balance degree.

The foregoing aspect and any possible implementation manner further provide an implementation manner, where the calculating the degree of balance of each item according to the multiple evaluation dimensions includes calculating the degree of balance M according to the following formula:

where n represents the number of evaluation dimensions, i represents the number of evaluation dimensions, Xi represents the score of the ith evaluation dimension, and ai represents the weighting factor of the ith evaluation dimension.

The above aspect and any possible implementation further provide an implementation, and after the plurality of items are sorted according to the balance, the plurality of items are presented in the sort on a user terminal interface.

The above aspects and any possible implementations further provide an implementation in which the project is an investment project, and the evaluation dimension includes a plurality of project industry importance, project capital expenditure amount, project benefit value, project period, project manpower, and policy engagement.

The above-mentioned aspect and any possible implementation manner further provide an implementation manner, where a value range of Xi is 1 or more and Xi or less and 100 or less, and a sum of the weight factors is 100%.

The above-described aspect and any possible implementation further provide an implementation that the obtaining a plurality of items to be sorted includes:

the item information of the item is acquired,

the item information includes at least one item of an item name and an item number.

In a second aspect of the invention, a balance-based item ranking apparatus is provided. The device includes:

the acquisition module acquires the project information of a plurality of projects to be sequenced;

a determining module that determines a plurality of evaluation dimensions of the project according to the project information;

the calculation module is used for calculating the balance degree of each project according to the plurality of evaluation dimensions;

and the sorting module sorts the plurality of items according to the balance degree.

In a third aspect of the invention, an electronic device is provided. The electronic device includes: a memory having a computer program stored thereon and a processor implementing the method as described above when executing the program.

In a fourth aspect of the invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method as according to the first aspect of the invention.

The project balance degree is calculated based on multiple evaluation dimensions to obtain the project balance degree so as to sequence the projects, a standard for objectively, uniformly and definitely measuring the project balance degree is provided, and accurate and effective evaluation on the projects is realized. And the plurality of items are sorted based on the calculated balance degree and the sorting result is displayed, so that the analysis result of the balance degree of the items is visually displayed, and the efficiency of item management is improved.

It should be understood that the statements herein reciting aspects are not intended to limit the critical or essential features of any embodiment of the invention, nor are they intended to limit the scope of the invention. Other features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description.

Drawings

The above and other features, advantages and aspects of various embodiments of the present invention will become more apparent by referring to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like or similar reference characters designate like or similar elements, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for ranking items based on balance according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an apparatus for ranking items based on a degree of equalization according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary electronic device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, but not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be obtained by a person skilled in the art without any inventive step based on the embodiments of the present invention, are within the scope of the present invention.

In addition, the term "and/or" herein is only one kind of association relationship describing an associated object, and means that there may be three kinds of relationships, for example, a and/or B, which may mean: a exists alone, A and B exist simultaneously, and B exists alone. In addition, the character "/" herein generally indicates that the former and latter related objects are in an "or" relationship.

FIG. 1 shows a flow diagram of a method 100 for equity-based item ranking, the method 100 comprising:

step S102, acquiring item information of a plurality of items to be sorted.

The project information of the projects is pre-stored in a background database, and when a user uses the project management software system, a project group can be selected from a project list, wherein the project group comprises a plurality of projects to be sequenced. The system acquires the corresponding item information of a plurality of items from the database according to the selection of the user, wherein the item information comprises an item name, an item number, an item type, an item period, an item fund, an item person and/or the like. Optionally, the project includes an investment project, a product development project, an engineering project, and the like.

Step S104, a plurality of evaluation dimensions of the project are determined according to the project information.

And determining at least two evaluation dimensions of the project according to the project type, wherein the evaluation dimensions comprise project industry importance, project capital expense amount, project benefit value, project period, project manpower and the like. And acquiring the project data corresponding to the evaluation dimension.

Each evaluation dimension is represented by a score of 1-100. The method comprises the steps of presetting a specific scoring standard and a scoring mode for each evaluation dimension, setting the scoring standard according to the requirements of a project in the industry field to which the project belongs, wherein the scoring mode comprises expert evaluation and scoring model calculation, taking project data corresponding to the evaluation dimension as a basis, evaluating or calculating to obtain the score of the evaluation dimension, for example, evaluating and scoring by an expert according to the preset standard or calculating the score by a scoring model generated by pre-training, specifically comprising the steps of training and generating the scoring model of each dimension based on historical project data in a machine learning mode, and inputting the data of the evaluation dimension of the project to be evaluated into the scoring model to obtain the corresponding score.

And step S106, calculating the balance degree of each item according to a plurality of evaluation dimensions.

The degree of equalization is denoted by M, which is calculated as:

wherein n represents the number of evaluation dimensions, n ≧ 2, i represents the number of evaluation dimensions, X_iScore representing the ith evaluation dimension, a_iA weighting factor representing the ith evaluation dimension.

Further, X_iHas a value range of 1 to X_iIs less than or equal to 100. The sum of the weight factors is 100%, the user sets the weight factor of the evaluation dimension according to the content represented by the specific evaluation dimension, the weight factor represents the importance degree of the evaluation dimension, and the weight factor can be set by the user according to needs or selected from preset schemes.

And S108, sequencing the plurality of items according to the balance degree.

And sequencing the items in sequence according to the balance degrees obtained in the steps and the sequence of the balance degrees from large to small.

And step S110, after the plurality of items are sorted according to the balance, displaying the plurality of items on a user terminal interface according to the sorting.

After the plurality of items are sorted, the plurality of items are presented on the user terminal interface in the order, including item information and a balance of the items. The presentation means include lists, graphs, charts and the like.

Based on the above item sorting method, the embodiment takes the investment items as an example for description, and the specific implementation of the item sorting of other items, such as product development items, engineering items, and the like, is similar to the specific implementation of the investment items, and is not described herein again.

When a plurality of items of which the item types are investment items are selected for sorting in this embodiment, step S102, acquiring item information of the plurality of items to be sorted includes:

a user selects an investment project group from a project list storing and displaying investment projects, and the system acquires project information of a plurality of projects corresponding to the investment project group from a background database storing the investment projects in advance according to the selection of the user, wherein the project information comprises project names, project numbers, project periods, project funds, project estimation benefits, project industry and the like.

When a plurality of items of which the item types are investment items are selected for ranking in the present embodiment, the step S104 of determining a plurality of evaluation dimensions of the items according to the item information includes:

the evaluation dimension of the project type which is the investment project comprises a plurality of project industry importance, project capital expenditure amount, project benefit value, project period, project manpower and policy engagement degree.

In this embodiment, the evaluation dimensions of the investment projects are five, including the project industry importance, the project capital expenditure amount, the project benefit value, the project period, and the policy engagement. And each evaluation dimension is represented by a score of 1-100, and the score of the evaluation dimension is preset according to the specific content of the evaluation dimension.

Specifically, for the importance of the project industry, a user divides the industry according to the national economy industry classification (GB/T4754-2011), sets importance scores of about 50 main investment industries in a third-party investment field expert evaluation mode, and resets the industry scores according to the change of investment conditions every year, wherein the score ranges from 1 to 100.

For the project capital expense amount, a user performs industry division according to national economy industry classification (GB/T4754-2011), basic fund amounts of about 50 main investment industries are set in a third-party investment field expert evaluation mode, the industry basic fund amount is reset according to the change of investment conditions every year, the project fund amount/the industry basic fund amount is the project capital expense amount, and the score interval is 1-100.

And for the project benefit value, evaluating the project by a third-party investment field expert evaluation mode to set a benefit score, wherein the score interval is 1-100.

And for the project period, performing project period score evaluation on the project in a third-party investment field expert evaluation mode, wherein the project period is not less than 90 points within 1 year, the project period of 2 years is not less than 80 points, the project period of 3 years is not less than 70 points, and the score interval is 1-100.

For the policy contract degree, a user divides the industry according to the national economy industry classification (GB/T4754-2011), evaluates the policy contract degree of a project in a third party investment field expert evaluation mode, evaluates the project policy contract degree, and basically evaluates the industry indicated by the current-year government work report, wherein the policy contract degree is not less than 90 points, the industry policy contract degree indicated by the last-year policy hotspot industry is not less than 80 points, the industry policy contract degree indicated by the government work report in 3 years is not less than 70 points, and the score interval is 1-100.

When a plurality of items of which the item types are investment items are selected for ranking in the present embodiment, in step S106, the degree of balance of each item is calculated from the above five evaluation dimensions.

The degree of equalization is denoted by M, which is calculated as:

wherein n represents the number of evaluation dimensions, and n is 5; i represents the number of the evaluation dimension; x_iScore, X respectively, representing the ith evaluation dimension₁Score, X, representing the project industry importance₂A score, X, representing the amount of capital expenditure of the project₃Score, X, representing the value of the benefit of the project₄Score, X, representing the period of the project₅A score representing the degree of policy engagement, and, X_iHas a value range of 1 to X_i≤100；a_iWeight factor representing the ith evaluation dimension, a₁Weight factor representing the importance of the project industry, a₂A weight factor representing the amount of capital expenditure of the project, a₃Weight factor representing the value of the benefit of the project, a₄Weight factor representing the period of the item, a₅Weight factors representing policy engagement degree, sum of weight factors (a)₁+a₂+a₃+a₄+a₅) Is 100%.

Preferably, in this embodiment, the project industry importance, the project capital expenditure amount, the project benefit value, the project period, and the policy engagement degree are selected as the evaluation dimensions of the investment project, and the weighting factors are set to a for the evaluation dimensions₁＝18％、a₂＝18％、a₃＝18％、a₄18% and a₅＝28％。

For example, the item information, the evaluation dimensions, and the scores and weighting factors thereof for a plurality of items of an investment item are shown in Table 1,

TABLE 1

The balance between the construction project a and the construction project B is calculated from the scores corresponding to the evaluation dimensions and the evaluation dimensions of the projects shown in table 1, as follows:

M_A＝80×18％+60×18％+80×18％+75×18％+95×28％＝79.7

M_B＝90×18％+50×18％+90×18％+85×18％+90×28％＝81.9

when a plurality of items with item types as investment items are selected for ranking in this embodiment, step S108, ranking the plurality of items according to the balance degree includes:

the balance M obtained according to the above calculation formula_AAnd M_BSequencing the investment projects, namely the construction projects A and the construction projects B according to a sequencing rule that the investment projects, namely the construction projects A and the construction projects B are subjected to the balance degree M_AAnd M_BAnd sequencing from big to small to obtain the sequence of the construction project B and the construction project A.

When a plurality of items of which the item types are investment items are selected for sorting in the embodiment, the step S110, after sorting the plurality of items, presenting the plurality of items in a sorting order on the user terminal interface includes:

the investment projects, namely construction project a and construction project B, are presented on a user terminal interface in an order according to the ordering of the investment projects.

For example, according to the items and their balance shown in Table 1, the items are sorted from the highest balance to the lowest balance and shown in Table 2,

TABLE 2

Item numbering	Name of item	Degree of equalization
			B	Construction project B	81.9
A	Construction project A	79.7

As shown in table 2, the balance of the construction project B is greater than that of the construction project a, and the construction projects B and a construction project a are shown in the list in this order.

In this embodiment, the item ordering is presented in a list. In some embodiments, the manner of ordered presentation is not limited to lists, and may be presented in the form of charts or icons.

It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the above-mentioned method embodiments are described as a series of acts or combination of acts, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited by the order of acts, as some steps may occur in other orders or concurrently in accordance with the invention. Further, those skilled in the art should also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are exemplary embodiments and that the acts and modules illustrated are not necessarily required to practice the invention.

The above is a description of method embodiments, and the embodiments of the present invention are further described below by way of apparatus embodiments.

FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a balance-based item ranking apparatus 200 according to an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus 200 may be used by the balance-based item ranking method 100 of fig. 1. As shown in fig. 2, the apparatus 200 includes:

an obtaining module 202, which obtains project information of a plurality of projects to be sorted;

a determining module 204, configured to determine a plurality of evaluation dimensions of the project according to the project information;

a calculating module 206, which calculates the balance of each item according to the plurality of evaluation dimensions;

a sorting module 208 for sorting the plurality of items according to the balance.

It can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the described module may refer to the corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiment, and is not described herein again.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic block diagram of an electronic device 300 that may be used to implement an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus 300 may be used to implement the balance-based item ranking method 100 shown in fig. 1. As shown in fig. 3, device 300 includes a Central Processing Unit (CPU)301 that may perform various appropriate actions and processes in accordance with computer program instructions stored in a Read Only Memory (ROM)302 or loaded from a storage unit 308 into a Random Access Memory (RAM) 303. In the RAM 303, various programs and data necessary for the operation of the device 300 can also be stored. The CPU 301, ROM302, and RAM 303 are connected to each other via a bus 304. An input/output (I/O) interface 305 is also connected to bus 304.

Various components in device 300 are connected to I/O interface 305, including: an input unit 306 such as a keyboard, a mouse, or the like; an output unit 307 such as various types of displays, speakers, and the like; a storage unit 308 such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, or the like; and a communication unit 309 such as a network card, modem, wireless communication transceiver, etc. The communication unit 309 allows the device 300 to exchange information/data with other devices via a computer network such as the internet and/or various telecommunication networks.

The processing unit 301 performs the various methods and processes described above, such as the method 100. For example, in some embodiments, the method 100 may be implemented as a computer software program tangibly embodied in a machine-readable medium, such as the storage unit 308. In some embodiments, part or all of the computer program may be loaded and/or installed onto device 300 via ROM302 and/or communication unit 309. When the computer program is loaded into RAM 303 and executed by CPU 301, one or more steps of method 100 described above may be performed. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the CPU 301 may be configured to perform the method 100 by any other suitable means (e.g., by way of firmware).

The functions described herein above may be performed, at least in part, by one or more hardware logic components. For example, without limitation, exemplary types of hardware logic components that may be used include: a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), an Application Specific Standard Product (ASSP), a system on a chip (SOC), a load programmable logic device (CPLD), and the like.

Program code for implementing the methods of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages. These program codes may be provided to a processor or controller of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus, such that the program codes, when executed by the processor or controller, cause the functions/operations specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram to be performed. The program code may execute entirely on the machine, partly on the machine, as a stand-alone software package partly on the machine and partly on a remote machine or entirely on the remote machine or server.

In the context of the present invention, a machine-readable medium may be a tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The machine-readable medium may be a machine-readable signal medium or a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of a machine-readable storage medium would include an electrical connection based on one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

Further, while operations are depicted in a particular order, this should be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Under certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Likewise, while several specific implementation details are included in the above discussion, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention. Certain features that are described in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination.

Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

Claims

1. A balance-based item ordering method is characterized by comprising the following steps:

acquiring project information of a plurality of projects to be sequenced;

and sorting the plurality of items according to the balance degree.

2. The balance-based item ranking method of claim 1,

the calculating the balance degree of each item according to the plurality of evaluation dimensions comprises calculating the balance degree M according to the following formula:

where n denotes the number of evaluation dimensions, i denotes the number of evaluation dimensions, X_iScore representing the ith evaluation dimension, a_iA weighting factor representing the ith evaluation dimension.

3. The balance-based item ranking method of claim 1,

and after the plurality of items are sorted according to the balance, presenting the plurality of items according to the sorting on a user terminal interface.

4. The balance-based project ranking method of claim 1 wherein the projects are investment projects and the evaluation dimensions comprise a plurality of project industry importance, project capital expenditure amount, project benefit value, project period, project manpower, and policy engagement.

5. The balance-based item ranking method of claim 2,

said X_iHas a value range of 1 to X_i≤100，

The sum of the weight factors is 100%.

6. The balance-based item sorting method according to claim 1, wherein the obtaining a plurality of items to be sorted comprises:

the item information of the item is acquired,

7. An apparatus for ranking items based on a degree of equalization, comprising:

8. An electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having stored thereon a computer program, wherein the processor, when executing the program, implements the method of any of claims 1-6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which program, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method of any one of claims 1 to 6.