CN110147928A - Project is put in storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium - Google Patents
Project is put in storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110147928A CN110147928A CN201910298643.1A CN201910298643A CN110147928A CN 110147928 A CN110147928 A CN 110147928A CN 201910298643 A CN201910298643 A CN 201910298643A CN 110147928 A CN110147928 A CN 110147928A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- score
- project
- unit
- scoring
- fund
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 108
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to data processing technique, a kind of project storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium are provided.The server includes a series of functional modules, pass through these functional modules, server is detected and receives the project storage scoring request of client sending, then, it obtains the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index, project scoring is calculated according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule, corresponding index is assessed according to unit and unit scoring is calculated in default second computation rule, it scores further according to the project, the unit scoring and default third computation rule calculate project storage scoring, the project storage is finally exported to score and feed back to the client.Using the present invention, project storage assessment is divided into project scoring and unit two dimensions of scoring, comprehensively and accurately overall merit is made to project storage assessment.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to data processing field more particularly to a kind of project storage appraisal procedures, server and storage medium.
Background technique
The project evaluation (Project Evaluation) is exactly in direct investment activity, feasible to investment project progress
On the basis of Journal of Sex Research, from the angle of enterprise's entirety to the plan of quasi- investment construction project, design and implement scheme carry out it is comprehensive
Technical and economic proof and evaluation, so that it is determined that the prospect of investment project future development.
It is put in storage link in project, project own situation and its unit situation are assessed and given a mark, as project examination
A reference frame.Project storage scoring, can be used as the antecedent supervision of project overall flow, can also be used as project reply
The reference frame appropriated with budget.
Currently, the factor for the method consideration assessed project and given a mark is not single, comprehensive, cause assessment result inaccurate
Really.
Summary of the invention
In view of the foregoing, the present invention provides a kind of project storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium.Its purpose exists
Comprehensively and accurately overall merit is made in the project for treating storage.
To achieve the above object, the present invention provides a kind of data recovery control method, this method comprises:
Receiving step: detecting and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues；
Obtaining step: obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index；
It calculates step: project is calculated and comments according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Point, including fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score, according to institute
State that unit assesses corresponding index and default second computation rule is calculated unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and
Unit CREDIT SCORE calculates project storage further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule
Scoring；
Output step: it exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
Preferably, the corresponding index of the project evaluation includes: similar item unit price of procurement, the non-buying gold of similar item
Volume, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence, performance objective evaluation score and the project application
Text, it includes: department's expenditure performance review score, unit credit rating information and unit prize that the unit, which assesses corresponding index,
Punish information.
Preferably, the calculation formula of fund reasonability score described in first computation rule includes: fund reasonability
Score=buying class fund reasonability score × non-buying class fund reasonability the score of K1+ × K2+ history item fund reasonability
Score × K3, wherein K1 is the weight for purchasing class fund reasonability score, and K2 is non-buying class fund reasonability score weight,
K3 is history item fund reasonability score weight；
The calculation formula of project recommendation score described in first computation rule includes: project recommendation score=item
Mesh source score × K4+ policy basis score × K5+ fund guarantee sequence score × K6, wherein K4 is that item source obtains fraction
Weight, K5 are policy basis score weight, and K6 is fund guarantee sequence score weight.
Preferably, the calculation formula of the scoring of project described in first computation rule includes: that project scoring=fund is closed
Rationality score+project recommendation score+performance objective evaluates score × K8+ file integrality score × K9, wherein K8 is performance
Target evaluates score weight, and K9 is file integrality score weight；
The calculation formula of the scoring of unit described in second computation rule includes: that unit scoring=unit performance appraisal obtains
Point × K10+ unit CREDIT SCORE × K11, wherein K10 is unit performance appraisal score weight, and K11 is unit CREDIT SCORE power
Weight.
Preferably, the calculation formula of the storage of project described in third computation rule scoring includes: project storage scoring
=project scoring × K12+ unit scoring × K13, wherein K12 is project scoring weight, and K13 is unit scoring weight.
To achieve the above object, the present invention also provides a kind of server, which includes: memory and processor,
It is characterized in that, stored items are put in storage appraisal procedure on the memory, and the project storage appraisal procedure is held by the processor
Row is, it can be achieved that following steps:
Receiving step: detecting and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues；
Obtaining step: obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index；
It calculates step: project is calculated and comments according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Point, including fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score, according to institute
State that unit assesses corresponding index and default second computation rule is calculated unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and
Unit CREDIT SCORE calculates project storage further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule
Scoring；
Output step: it exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
Preferably, the corresponding index of the project evaluation includes: similar item unit price of procurement, the non-buying gold of similar item
Volume, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence, performance objective evaluation score and the project application
Text, it includes: department's expenditure performance review score, unit credit rating information and unit prize that the unit, which assesses corresponding index,
Punish information.
Preferably, the calculation formula of fund reasonability score described in first computation rule includes: fund reasonability
Score=buying class fund reasonability score × non-buying class fund reasonability the score of K1+ × K2+ history item fund reasonability
Score × K3, wherein K1 is the weight for purchasing class fund reasonability score, and K2 is non-buying class fund reasonability score weight,
K3 is history item fund reasonability score weight；
The calculation formula of project recommendation score described in first computation rule includes: project recommendation score=item
Mesh source score × K4+ policy basis score × K5+ fund guarantee sequence score × K6, wherein K4 is that item source obtains fraction
Weight, K5 are policy basis score weight, and K6 is fund guarantee sequence score weight.
Preferably, the calculation formula of the scoring of project described in first computation rule includes: that project scoring=fund is closed
Rationality score+project recommendation score+performance objective evaluates score × K8+ file integrality score × K9, wherein K8 is performance
Target evaluates score weight, and K9 is file integrality score weight；
The calculation formula of the scoring of unit described in second computation rule includes: that unit scoring=unit performance appraisal obtains
Point × K10+ unit CREDIT SCORE × K11, wherein K10 is unit performance appraisal score weight, and K11 is unit CREDIT SCORE power
Weight.
To achieve the above object, the present invention also provides a kind of computer readable storage medium, the computer-readable storages
It include that project is put in storage appraisal procedure in medium, it can be achieved that as described above when the project storage appraisal procedure is executed by processor
Project is put in storage the arbitrary steps in appraisal procedure.
Project storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium proposed by the present invention, solve project and are assessed and beaten
The factor for dividing method to consider is single and not comprehensive, leads to the problem of assessment result inaccuracy, by the way that the project evaluation to be divided into: project
Scoring and unit two dimensions of scoring, unit score are taken into account, in project score, it is contemplated that fund reasonability, policy
Compliance, project performance target and file integrity degree, unit score are then included in unit performance appraisal and credit information two dimensions
Degree, makes comprehensively and accurately overall merit to project.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the applied environment figure that project of the present invention is put in storage appraisal procedure preferred embodiment；
Fig. 2 is the schematic diagram of server preferred embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 3 is the module diagram that project is put in storage appraisal procedure preferred embodiment in Fig. 2；
Fig. 4 is the flow chart that project of the present invention is put in storage appraisal procedure preferred embodiment；
The embodiments will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings for the realization, the function and the advantages of the object of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
In order to make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the present invention clearer, with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments, right
The present invention is further elaborated.It should be appreciated that described herein, specific examples are only used to explain the present invention, not
For limiting the present invention.Based on the embodiments of the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art are not before making creative work
Every other embodiment obtained is put, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It is the applied environment figure of project storage appraisal procedure preferred embodiment of the present invention shown in referring to Fig.1.Server 1 is pacified
Appraisal procedure 10 is put in storage equipped with project.Multiple client 3 connects server 1 by network 2.Network 2 can be local area network, wide area
Net, Metropolitan Area Network (MAN), the network of personal area network etc. type；It can be cable network, or wireless network.Client 3 can
Think desktop PC, notebook, tablet computer, mobile phone or it is other application software is installed, can pass through network 2 and clothes
The terminal installation that business device 1 is communicated.
It is the schematic diagram of 1 preferred embodiment of server of the present invention referring to shown in Fig. 2.
Server 1 includes but is not limited to memory 11, processor 12.
Wherein, memory 11 include at least a type of readable storage medium storing program for executing, the readable storage medium storing program for executing include flash memory,
Hard disk, multimedia card, card-type memory (for example, SD or DX memory etc.), random access storage device (RAM), static random are visited
It asks memory (SRAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), may be programmed read-only deposit
Reservoir (PROM), magnetic storage, disk, CD etc..In some embodiments, the memory 11 can be the server
1 internal storage unit, such as the hard disk or memory of the server 1.In further embodiments, the memory 11 can also be with
It is the External memory equipment of the server 1, such as the plug-in type hard disk that the server 1 is equipped with, intelligent memory card (Smart
Media Card, SMC), secure digital (Secure Digital, SD) card, flash card (Flash Card) etc..Certainly, described
Memory 11 can also both including the server 1 internal storage unit and also including its External memory equipment.In the present embodiment,
Memory 11 is installed on the operating system and types of applications software of the server 1 commonly used in storage, such as project storage is commented
Estimate the program code etc. of program 10.It has exported or will export in addition, memory 11 can be also used for temporarily storing
Various types of data.
Processor 12 can be in some embodiments central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU),
Controller, microcontroller, microprocessor or other data processing chips.The processor 12 is commonly used in the control server 1
Overall operation, such as execute data interaction or communication it is relevant control and processing etc..In the present embodiment, the processor 12
For running the program code that stores in the memory 11 or processing data, such as operation project storage appraisal procedure 10
Program code etc..
Fig. 2 illustrates only the server 1 with component 11-12 and project storage appraisal procedure 10, it should be understood that
It is, it is not required that implement all components shown, the implementation that can be substituted is more or less component.
Optionally, the server 1 can also include user interface, user interface may include display (Display),
Input unit such as keyboard (Keyboard), optional user interface can also include standard wireline interface and wireless interface.It can
Selection of land, in some embodiments, display can be light-emitting diode display, liquid crystal display, touch-control liquid crystal display and organic
Light emitting diode (Organic Light-Emitting Diode, OLED) touches device etc..Wherein, display can also be appropriate
Referred to as display screen or display unit, for showing the information handled in the server 1 and for showing visual user circle
Face.
The server 1 can also include radio frequency (Radio Frequency, RF) circuit, sensor and voicefrequency circuit etc.,
Details are not described herein.
It in the above-described embodiments, can be real when processor 12 executes the project storage appraisal procedure 10 stored in memory 11
Existing following steps:
Receiving step: detecting and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues；
Obtaining step: obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index；
It calculates step: project is calculated and comments according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Point, including fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score, according to institute
State that unit assesses corresponding index and default second computation rule is calculated unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and
Unit CREDIT SCORE calculates project storage further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule
Scoring；
Output step: it exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
About being discussed in detail for above-mentioned steps, journey of following Fig. 3 about project storage 10 embodiment of appraisal procedure is please referred to
The explanation of sequence module map and Fig. 4 about the flow chart of project storage appraisal procedure embodiment.
In other embodiments, the project storage appraisal procedure 10 can be divided into multiple modules, multiple module
It is stored in memory 12, and is executed by processor 13, to complete the present invention.The so-called module of the present invention is to refer to complete
The series of computation machine program instruction section of specific function.
It is the Program modual graph that project is put in storage 10 1 embodiment of appraisal procedure in Fig. 2 referring to shown in Fig. 3.In the present embodiment
In, project storage appraisal procedure 10 can be divided into: receiving module 110 obtains module 120, computing module 130 and defeated
Module 140 out.
Receiving module 110, the project storage scoring request issued for detecting and receiving the client.
In one embodiment, the user of the client of 110 pairs of initiation project storage scoring requests of receiving module uses
The identification of family identity information, subscriber identity information identification is by then executing the obtaining step, and subscriber identity information identification failure is then
The storage scoring of refusal project requests and generates warning information.
Module 120 is obtained, assesses corresponding index for obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit.
In the present embodiment, the corresponding index of the project evaluation includes: similar item unit price of procurement, the non-buying gold of similar item
Volume, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence, performance objective evaluation score and the project application
Text, it includes: department's expenditure performance review score, unit credit rating information and unit rewards and punishments letter that unit, which assesses corresponding index,
Breath.
The corresponding index of the acquisition project evaluation can be to be obtained from system in conjunction with similar item, the dependency number of similar item
According to the related data for being the top10% project obtained in the similar item reference model of project application link, above-mentioned similar terms
The non-procurement value of mesh unit price of procurement, similar item, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence
And project application text index is obtained from system.Performance objective evaluates score and department's expenditure performance review Scoring Guidelines can be with
It is obtained from performance systems, unit credit rating information and unit rewards and punishments information index can be obtained from external website.
Similar item unit price of procurement index can be the unit price of procurement of similar item class assets, history item amount declared
Index can be the amount declared according to project name and the matched history item of function subject, during item source index can be
Centre arrangement project, provincial arrangement project, municaipal Party committee and government identify project or unit fulfilling needs to arrange project, policy basis index
It can be the situation that is consistent between the true situation of policy and project and policy, fund guarantee sequence index can be according to project
Importance, urgency and exploitativeness are divided into rigid project and elastic project, and it is necessary that project application text index can be project
It presents a paper and the nonessential quantity presented a paper.
The computing module 130, based on according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Calculation show that project scores, including fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality
Score assesses corresponding index according to the unit and unit scoring, including unit achievement is calculated in default second computation rule
Effect evaluation score and unit CREDIT SCORE, further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule meter
The storage scoring of calculating project.
In one embodiment, the calculation formula of fund reasonability score includes: fund reasonability in the first computation rule
Score=buying class fund reasonability score × non-buying class fund reasonability the score of K1+ × K2+ history item fund reasonability
Score × K3, wherein K1 is the weight for purchasing class fund reasonability score, and K2 is non-buying class fund reasonability score weight,
K3 is history item fund reasonability score weight；
The calculation formula of the recommendatory score of project includes: that project recommendation score=item source obtains in first computation rule
Point × K4+ policy basis score × K5+ fund guarantee sequence score × K6, wherein K4 is item source score weight, and K5 is political affairs
For plan according to score weight, K6 is fund guarantee sequence score weight.
Wherein, class fund reasonability score computation method is purchased are as follows:
For the i-th class assets, the unit price of procurement average value of such assets first in calculating similar item, if similar item the
The unit price of procurement of declaring of i class assets is Pi, the monovalent average value of similar item the i-th class assetsPinThe unit price of procurement for indicating the i-th class assets of n-th of similar item, if in similar item
Without such assets, the unit price of procurement that its unit price is similar item is defaulted.By the unit price and similar terms of project the i-th class assets
Purpose the i-th class assets average value PmeanIt makes comparisons, if:
|Pi-Pmean|/Pmean≤ 10%, score S=100；
10% < | Pi-Pmean|/Pmean≤ 30%, score S=85；
30% < | Pi-Pmean|/Pmean≤ 50%, score S=70；
|Pi-Pmean|/Pmean> 50%, score S=55.
Buying class fund reasonability is scored at the average value of all kinds of assets scores in the project:
Purchase class fund reasonability score=(S1+S2+…+Sn)/n, wherein project purchasing n class assets, SnFor this
The score of n-th class assets in project.
Non- buying class fund reasonability score computation method are as follows:
For the non-buying class amount of money of the i-th class, the average value of the non-buying class amount of money first in calculating similar item, if similar terms
The non-buying class amount of money of the i-th class of mesh is fi, the average value of the non-buying class amount of money of the i-th class of similar itemfinThe non-buying class amount of money of i-th class of n-th of similar item is indicated, if in similar item
Without such non-procurement payment, the non-buying class fund for defaulting the project is reasonable.By non-buying class amount of money fiIt is non-with similar item
Purchase the average value f of the class amount of moneymeanIt makes comparisons, if:
|fi-fmean|/fmean≤ 10%, score S=100；
10% < | fi-fmean|/fmean≤ 30%, score S=85；
30% < | fi-fmean|/fmean≤ 50%, score S=70；
|fi-fmean|/fmean> 50%, score S=55.
The non-buying class fund reasonability score of project is the weighted average of non-procurement value score of all categories, and weight is
This fund accounts for the total value of all non-buying class amount of money.That is:
History item fund reasonability score computation method are as follows:
History item judgment criteria: 1, project name is consistent；2, function subject is consistent.Text matches are utilized, item is compared
The growth rate of mesh amount declared and history item amount declared, if:
Growth rate≤10%, score=100；
10% < growth rate≤20%, score=85；
20% < growth rate≤40%, score=65；
Growth rate > 40%, score=45.
Item source score computation method are as follows:
Item source is if for central arrangement project, item source score=100；If provincial arrangement project, project is come
Source score=85；It identifies project if municaipal Party committee and government, item source score=70；If needing to arrange project for unit fulfilling,
Item source score=55.
Policy basis score computation method are as follows:
Judge from whether policy is true with whether policy categories content is consistent two dimensions.
For certain policy basis, it is believed that a policy is 5 points.Its last score are as follows:
(1) judge whether policy is true: the policy basis that user is uploaded, i.e., the title of policy and code are in data warehouse
Policy document library in retrieved.The policy is true if retrieving successfully, and enters the inspection of Section 2 content；Retrieval not at
Function, this policy are scored at 0.
(2) policy for successfully (obtaining 5 points) is retrieved for the first step, carries out its detection whether being consistent with the contents of a project: will
The title of project and its content of text of upload are segmented, the meter of vectorization and cosine similarity with the Content of policy of upload
It calculates.Similarity is higher than a certain threshold value and then illustrates that the two is related, i.e., project is consistent with Content of policy；On the contrary then content is not inconsistent.Content
It is not inconsistent, score is then 0.
(3) the policy item number that policy item number × 5- policy that this score=100- is not retrieved and the contents of a project are not inconsistent ×
5。
Fund guarantee sequence score computation method are as follows:
According to the importance, urgency and exploitativeness of project, it is classified as rigid project and elastic project, last year has pacified
Row's project (A class), score=100；Rigid project (B class), score=80；Elastic project (C1 class), score=60；Elastic project
(C2 class), score=50；Elastic project (C3 class), score=40；Elastic project (C4 class), score=30.
File integrality score computation method are as follows:
Project application text is by project application book, project appropriation budget detail list, project feasibility report and project appraisal
Report (being expounded through peer review opinion) composition.Therefore it is above-mentioned four that file, which must be mentioned,.
Nonessential present a paper can have policy basis, Audit Report etc., then file integrality score=nonessential submission
File number × 5, highest bonus point are 10 points.
Unit CREDIT SCORE calculation method are as follows:
Unit credit rating is the unit of AAA or level-one, score=50；Unit credit rating is the unit of AA or second level,
Score=40；Unit credit rating is the unit of A or three-level, score=30；
The information that unit violates disciplines if it exists, then once subtract 5 point；The information of commendation or prize-winning situation if it exists, once
Add 5 points.If there is unit credit rating information, divides on the basis of 50 and added and subtracted；If without unit credit rating information, with
It is added and subtracted on the basis of 100.
In another embodiment, the calculation formula of project scoring includes: in the first computation rule
Project scoring=fund reasonability score+project recommendation score+performance objective evaluation score × K8+ file is complete
Property score × K9, wherein K8 be performance objective evaluate score weight, K9 be file integrality score weight；
The calculation formula of unit scoring includes: in second computation rule
Unit scoring=unit performance appraisal score × K10+ unit CREDIT SCORE × K11, wherein K10 is unit performance
Score weight is evaluated, K11 is unit CREDIT SCORE weight.
It in another embodiment, further include that project storage is calculated and comments according to project scoring, unit scoring
Point.
The calculation formula of project storage scoring includes: project storage scoring=project scoring × K12+ in third computation rule
Unit scoring × K13, wherein K12 is project scoring weight, and K13 is unit scoring weight.
The output module 140, for exporting the project storage scoring and feeding back to the client.
As shown in figure 4, being the flow chart of project storage appraisal procedure preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Step S10 detects and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues.In the storage assessment of the project of reception
Before request, subscriber identity information identification, user identity letter are carried out to the user of the client of the project of initiation storage scoring request
By then executing the obtaining step, project storage scoring is then refused in subscriber identity information identification failure requests and generates for breath identification
Warning information.
Step S20, obtains the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index.
The corresponding index of the project evaluation includes: similar item unit price of procurement, the non-procurement value of similar item, history item Shen
Report the amount of money, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence, performance objective evaluation score and project application text, unit assessment
Corresponding index includes: department's expenditure performance review score, unit credit rating information and unit rewards and punishments information.
The corresponding index of the acquisition project evaluation can be to be obtained from system in conjunction with similar item, the dependency number of similar item
According to the related data for being the top10% project obtained in the similar item reference model of project application link, above-mentioned similar terms
The non-procurement value of mesh unit price of procurement, similar item, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence
And project application text index is obtained from system.Performance objective evaluates score and department's expenditure performance review Scoring Guidelines can be with
It is obtained from performance systems, unit credit rating information and unit rewards and punishments information index can be obtained from external website.
Similar item unit price of procurement index can be the unit price of procurement of similar item class assets, history item amount declared
Index can be the amount declared according to project name and the matched history item of function subject, during item source index can be
Centre arrangement project, provincial arrangement project, municaipal Party committee and government identify project or unit fulfilling needs to arrange project, policy basis index
It can be the situation that is consistent between the true situation of policy and project and policy, fund guarantee sequence index can be according to project
Importance, urgency and exploitativeness are divided into rigid project and elastic project, and it is necessary that project application text index can be project
It presents a paper and the nonessential quantity presented a paper.
Project scoring is calculated according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule in step S30,
Including fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score, according to the list
Corresponding index is assessed in position and unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and unit is calculated in default second computation rule
CREDIT SCORE calculates project storage scoring further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule.
Further, in the first computation rule the calculation formula of fund reasonability score include: fund reasonability score=
The buying non-buying class fund reasonability score of class fund reasonability score × K1+ × K2+ history item fund reasonability score ×
K3, wherein K1 is the weight for purchasing class fund reasonability score, and K2 is non-buying class fund reasonability score weight, and K3 is to go through
History project funds reasonability score weight；
The calculation formula of the recommendatory score of project includes: that project recommendation score=item source obtains in first computation rule
Point × K4+ policy basis score × K5+ fund guarantee sequence score × K6, wherein K4 is item source score weight, and K5 is political affairs
For plan according to score weight, K6 is fund guarantee sequence score weight.
Purchase class fund reasonability score computation method are as follows:
For the i-th class assets, the unit price of procurement average value of such assets first in calculating similar item, if similar item the
The unit price of procurement of declaring of i class assets is Pi, the monovalent average value of similar item the i-th class assetsPinThe unit price of procurement for indicating the i-th class assets of n-th of similar item, if in similar item
Without such assets, the unit price of procurement that its unit price is similar item is defaulted.By the unit price and similar terms of project the i-th class assets
Purpose the i-th class assets average value PmeanIt makes comparisons, if:
|Pi-Pmean|/Pmean≤ 10%, score S=100；
10% < | Pi-Pmean|/Pmean≤ 30%, score S=85；
30% < | Pi-Pmean|/Pmean≤ 50%, score S=70；
|Pi-Pmean|/Pmean> 50%, score S=55.
Buying class fund reasonability is scored at the average value of all kinds of assets scores in the project:
Purchase class fund reasonability score=(S1+S2+…+Sn)/n, wherein project purchasing n class assets, SnFor this
The score of n-th class assets in project.
Non- buying class fund reasonability score computation method are as follows:
For the non-buying class amount of money of the i-th class, the average value of the non-buying class amount of money first in calculating similar item, if similar terms
The non-buying class amount of money of the i-th class of mesh is fi, the average value of the non-buying class amount of money of the i-th class of similar itemfinThe non-buying class amount of money of i-th class of n-th of similar item is indicated, if in similar item
Without such non-procurement payment, the non-buying class fund for defaulting the project is reasonable.By non-buying class amount of money fiIt is non-with similar item
Purchase the average value f of the class amount of moneymeanIt makes comparisons, if:
|fi-fmean|/fmean≤ 10%, score s=100；
10% < | fi-fmean|/fmean≤ 30%, score s=85；
30% < | fi-fmean|/fmean≤ 50%, score s=70；
|fi-fmean|/fmean> 50%, score s=55.
The non-buying class fund reasonability score of project is the weighted average of non-procurement value score of all categories, and weight is
This fund accounts for the total value of all non-buying class amount of money.That is:
History item fund reasonability score computation method are as follows:
History item judgment criteria: 1, project name is consistent；2, function subject is consistent.Text matches are utilized, item is compared
The growth rate of mesh amount declared and history item amount declared, if:
Growth rate≤10%, score=100；
10% < growth rate≤20%, score=85；
20% < growth rate≤40%, score=65；
Growth rate > 40%, score=45.
Item source score computation method are as follows:
Item source is if central arrangement project, item source score=100；If provincial arrangement project, item source
Score=85；It identifies project if municaipal Party committee and government, item source score=70；If needing to arrange project, item for unit fulfilling
Mesh source score=55.
Policy basis score computation method are as follows:
Judge from whether policy is true with whether policy categories content is consistent two dimensions.
For certain policy basis, it is believed that a policy is 5 points.Its last score are as follows:
(1) judge whether policy is true: the policy basis that user is uploaded, i.e., the title of policy and code are in data warehouse
Policy document library in retrieved.The policy is true if retrieving successfully, and enters the inspection of Section 2 content；Retrieval not at
Function, this policy are scored at 0.
(2) policy for successfully (obtaining 5 points) is retrieved for the first step, carries out its detection whether being consistent with the contents of a project: will
The title of project and its content of text of upload are segmented, the meter of vectorization and cosine similarity with the Content of policy of upload
It calculates.Similarity is higher than a certain threshold value and then illustrates that the two is related, i.e., project is consistent with Content of policy；On the contrary then content is not inconsistent.Content
It is not inconsistent, score is then 0.
(3) the policy item number that policy item number × 5- policy that this score=100- is not retrieved and the contents of a project are not inconsistent ×
5。
Fund guarantee sequence score computation method are as follows:
According to the importance, urgency and exploitativeness of project, it is classified as rigid project and elastic project, last year has pacified
Row's project (A class), score=100；Rigid project (B class), score=80；Elastic project (C1 class), score=60；Elastic project
(C2 class), score=50；Elastic project (C3 class), score=40；Elastic project (C4 class), score=30.
File integrality score computation method are as follows:
Project application text is by project application book, project appropriation budget detail list, project feasibility report and project appraisal
Report (being expounded through peer review opinion) composition.Therefore it is above-mentioned four that file, which must be mentioned,.
Nonessential present a paper can have policy basis, Audit Report etc., then file integrality score=nonessential submission
File number × 5, highest bonus point are 10 points.
Unit CREDIT SCORE calculation method are as follows:
Unit credit rating is the unit of AAA or level-one, score=50；Unit credit rating is the unit of AA or second level,
Score=40；Unit credit rating is the unit of A or three-level, score=30；
The information that unit violates disciplines if it exists, then once subtract 5 point；The information of commendation or prize-winning situation if it exists, once
Add 5 points.If there is unit credit rating information, divides on the basis of 50 and added and subtracted；If without unit credit rating information, with
It is added and subtracted on the basis of 100.
Further, the calculation formula of project scoring includes: in the first computation rule
Project scoring=fund reasonability score+project recommendation score+performance objective evaluation score × K8+ file is complete
Property score × K9, wherein K8 be performance objective evaluate score weight, K9 be file integrality score weight；
The calculation formula of unit scoring includes: in second computation rule
Unit scoring=unit performance appraisal score × K10+ unit CREDIT SCORE × K11, wherein K10 is unit performance
Score weight is evaluated, K11 is unit CREDIT SCORE weight.
Further, the calculation formula of project storage scoring includes:
The calculation formula of project storage scoring includes: project storage scoring=project scoring × K12+ in third computation rule
Unit scoring × K13, wherein K12 is project scoring weight, and K13 is unit scoring weight.
Step S40 exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
In addition, the embodiment of the present invention also proposes a kind of computer readable storage medium, which can
To be hard disk, multimedia card, SD card, flash card, SMC, read-only memory (ROM), Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory EPROM
(EPROM), any one in portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), USB storage etc. or several timess
Meaning combination.It include that project is put in storage appraisal procedure 10 in the computer readable storage medium, the project is put in storage appraisal procedure 10
Following operation is realized when being executed by processor:
Receiving step: detecting and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues；
Obtaining step: obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index；
It calculates step: project is calculated and comments according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Point, including fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score, according to institute
State that unit assesses corresponding index and default second computation rule is calculated unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and
Unit CREDIT SCORE calculates project storage further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule
Scoring；
Output step: it exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
The specific embodiment of the computer readable storage medium of the present invention is specific with above-mentioned project storage appraisal procedure
Embodiment is roughly the same, and details are not described herein.
It should be noted that the serial number of the above embodiments of the invention is only for description, do not represent the advantages or disadvantages of the embodiments.And
The terms "include", "comprise" herein or any other variant thereof is intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that packet
Process, device, article or the method for including a series of elements not only include those elements, but also including being not explicitly listed
Other element, or further include for this process, device, article or the intrinsic element of method.Do not limiting more
In the case where, the element that is limited by sentence "including a ...", it is not excluded that including process, device, the article of the element
Or there is also other identical elements in method.
Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can be understood that above-described embodiment side
Method can be realized by means of software and necessary general hardware platform, naturally it is also possible to by hardware, but in many cases
The former is more preferably embodiment.Based on this understanding, technical solution of the present invention substantially in other words does the prior art
The part contributed out can be embodied in the form of software products, which is stored in one as described above
In storage medium (such as ROM/RAM, magnetic disk, CD), including some instructions are used so that terminal device (it can be mobile phone,
Computer, server or network equipment etc.) execute method described in each embodiment of the present invention.
The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, all to utilize this hair
Equivalent structure or equivalent flow shift made by bright specification and accompanying drawing content is applied directly or indirectly in other relevant skills
Art field, is included within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of project is put in storage appraisal procedure, it is applied to server, which connects one or more clients, special
Sign is, the described method comprises the following steps:
Receiving step: detecting and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues；
Obtaining step: obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index；
It calculates step: project scoring, packet is calculated according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score are included, according to the unit
It assesses corresponding index and unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and unit letter is calculated in default second computation rule
With score, project storage scoring is calculated further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule；
Output step: it exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
2. project as described in claim 1 is put in storage appraisal procedure, which is characterized in that the corresponding index packet of the project evaluation
It includes: the non-procurement value of similar item unit price of procurement, similar item, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, money
Golden guarantee sequence, performance objective evaluation score and project application text, it includes: described that the unit, which assesses corresponding index,
Unit performance appraisal score, unit credit rating information and unit rewards and punishments information.
3. project as claimed in claim 2 is put in storage appraisal procedure, it is characterised in that:
The calculation formula of fund reasonability score described in first computation rule includes: fund reasonability score=buying class
The non-buying class fund reasonability score of fund reasonability score × K1+ × K2+ history item fund reasonability score × K3,
In, K1 is the weight for purchasing class fund reasonability score, and K2 is non-buying class fund reasonability score weight, and K3 is history item
Fund reasonability score weight；
The calculation formula of project recommendation score described in first computation rule includes: that project recommendation score=project is come
Source score × K4+ policy basis score × K5+ fund guarantee sequence score × K6, wherein K4 is item source score weight, K5
For policy basis score weight, K6 is fund guarantee sequence score weight.
4. project as described in claim 1 is put in storage appraisal procedure, it is characterised in that:
The calculation formula of the scoring of project described in first computation rule includes: project scoring=fund reasonability score+item
The recommendatory score of mesh+performance objective evaluates score × K8+ file integrality score × K9, wherein K8 is that performance objective is evaluated
Fraction weight, K9 are file integrality score weight；
Unit described in second computation rule scoring calculation formula include: unit scoring=unit performance appraisal score ×
K10+ unit CREDIT SCORE × K11, wherein K10 is unit performance appraisal score weight, and K11 is unit CREDIT SCORE weight.
5. project as described in claim 1 is put in storage appraisal procedure, which is characterized in that project described in the third computation rule
The calculation formula of storage scoring includes: project storage scoring=project scoring × K12+ unit scoring × K13, wherein K12 is item
Mesh scoring weight, K13 are unit scoring weight.
6. a kind of server, which includes: memory and processor, which is characterized in that stored items on the memory
It is put in storage appraisal procedure, the project storage appraisal procedure is executed by the processor, realize following steps:
Receiving step: detecting and receives the project storage scoring request that the client issues；
Obtaining step: obtaining the corresponding index of the project evaluation and unit assesses corresponding index；
It calculates step: project scoring, packet is calculated according to the corresponding index of the project evaluation and default first computation rule
Fund reasonability score, project recommendation score, performance objective evaluation score and file integrality score are included, according to the unit
It assesses corresponding index and unit scoring, including unit performance appraisal score and unit letter is calculated in default second computation rule
With score, project storage scoring is calculated further according to project scoring, unit scoring and default third computation rule；
Output step: it exports the project storage and scores and feed back to the client.
7. server as claimed in claim 6, which is characterized in that the corresponding index of the project evaluation includes: similar item
The non-procurement value of unit price of procurement, similar item, history item amount declared, item source, policy basis, fund guarantee sequence,
The performance objective evaluation score and project application text, it includes: that the unit performance is commented that the unit, which assesses corresponding index,
Valence score, unit credit rating information and unit rewards and punishments information.
8. server as claimed in claim 7, it is characterised in that:
The calculation formula of fund reasonability score described in first computation rule includes: fund reasonability score=buying class
The non-buying class fund reasonability score of fund reasonability score × K1+ × K2+ history item fund reasonability score × K3,
In, K1 is the weight for purchasing class fund reasonability score, and K2 is non-buying class fund reasonability score weight, and K3 is history item
Fund reasonability score weight；
The calculation formula of project recommendation score described in first computation rule includes: that project recommendation score=project is come
Source score × K4+ policy basis score × K5+ fund guarantee sequence score × K6, wherein K4 is item source score weight, K5
For policy basis score weight, K6 is fund guarantee sequence score weight.
9. server as claimed in claim 6, it is characterised in that:
The calculation formula of the scoring of project described in first computation rule includes: project scoring=fund reasonability score+item
The recommendatory score of mesh+performance objective evaluates score × K8+ file integrality score × K9, wherein K8 is that performance objective is evaluated
Fraction weight, K9 are file integrality score weight；
Unit described in second computation rule scoring calculation formula include: unit scoring=unit performance appraisal score ×
K10+ unit CREDIT SCORE × K11, wherein K10 is unit performance appraisal score weight, and K11 is unit CREDIT SCORE weight.
10. a kind of computer readable storage medium, which is characterized in that include that project is put in storage in the computer readable storage medium
Appraisal procedure, it can be achieved that as described in any one of claims 1 to 5 when the project storage appraisal procedure is executed by processor
Project is put in storage the step of appraisal procedure.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910298643.1A CN110147928A (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2019-04-15 | Project is put in storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910298643.1A CN110147928A (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2019-04-15 | Project is put in storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110147928A true CN110147928A (en) | 2019-08-20 |
Family
ID=67588557
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910298643.1A Pending CN110147928A (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2019-04-15 | Project is put in storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110147928A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110610350A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2019-12-24 | 深圳市元征科技股份有限公司 | Project management method, device and equipment |
| CN111598418A (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-28 | 思创数码科技股份有限公司 | Balance-based item sorting method, balance-based item sorting device, balance-based item sorting equipment and storage medium |
| CN112183969A (en) * | 2020-09-15 | 2021-01-05 | 北京每日优鲜电子商务有限公司 | Payment equipment operation control method and device for supply order and electronic equipment |
| CN113159537A (en) * | 2021-04-06 | 2021-07-23 | 南方电网能源发展研究院有限责任公司 | Evaluation method and device for new technical project of power grid and computer equipment |
-
2019
- 2019-04-15 CN CN201910298643.1A patent/CN110147928A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110610350A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2019-12-24 | 深圳市元征科技股份有限公司 | Project management method, device and equipment |
| CN111598418A (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-28 | 思创数码科技股份有限公司 | Balance-based item sorting method, balance-based item sorting device, balance-based item sorting equipment and storage medium |
| CN112183969A (en) * | 2020-09-15 | 2021-01-05 | 北京每日优鲜电子商务有限公司 | Payment equipment operation control method and device for supply order and electronic equipment |
| CN113159537A (en) * | 2021-04-06 | 2021-07-23 | 南方电网能源发展研究院有限责任公司 | Evaluation method and device for new technical project of power grid and computer equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107945024B (en) | Method for identifying internet financial loan enterprise operation abnormity, terminal equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110147928A (en) | Project is put in storage appraisal procedure, server and storage medium | |
| CN109829776B (en) | Merchant risk assessment method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Bradley | FinTech's Double Edges | |
| US20140258169A1 (en) | Method and system for automated verification of customer reviews | |
| CN109543096A (en) | Data query method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| KR102089666B1 (en) | Method for automatically aggregating and evaluating seller credit rate using big data and ai auto classification server | |
| CN110135942A (en) | Products Show method, apparatus and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN110246031A (en) | Appraisal procedure, system, equipment and the storage medium of business standing | |
| US20200279336A1 (en) | Scoring trustworthiness, competence, and/or compatibility of any entity for activities including recruiting or hiring decisions, composing a team, insurance underwriting, credit decisions, or shortening or improving sales cycles | |
| Saxena et al. | Big data and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in Omani banks: A case study | |
| US20230116362A1 (en) | Scoring trustworthiness, competence, and/or compatibility of any entity for activities including recruiting or hiring decisions, composing a team, insurance underwriting, credit decisions, or shortening or improving sales cycles | |
| CN111241161A (en) | Invoice information mining method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111582932A (en) | Inter-scene information pushing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112511632B (en) | Object pushing method, device and equipment based on multi-source data and storage medium | |
| KR102047859B1 (en) | Corporate credit rating server based on deep learning and method for corporate credit rating using the same | |
| CN112085332A (en) | Data processing method, data processing device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Khadivizand et al. | Towards intelligent feature engineering for risk-based customer segmentation in banking | |
| CN116342305A (en) | Travel expense reimbursement method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115550077A (en) | Real-time online detection danger source data and trigger automatic defense method | |
| CN109472709A (en) | Insurance price calculation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| KR20130135810A (en) | System and a method for trading stocks automatically based on opinion mining, and a storage medium storing a program thereof | |
| JP2021136033A (en) | Information processing device, information processing method and program | |
| CN108268482A (en) | Information-pushing method, device and equipment | |
| CN110147927A (en) | Financial position of the enterprise appraisal procedure, server and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20190820 |