CN111415102A - Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method - Google Patents

Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111415102A
CN111415102A CN202010306204.3A CN202010306204A CN111415102A CN 111415102 A CN111415102 A CN 111415102A CN 202010306204 A CN202010306204 A CN 202010306204A CN 111415102 A CN111415102 A CN 111415102A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
toughness
power monitoring
monitoring system
index
evaluation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010306204.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111415102B (en
Inventor
刘文霞
张鹏
刘冰
郝东
龚钢军
李军
江金寿
田建辉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North China Electric Power University
Ordnance Science and Research Academy of China
Original Assignee
North China Electric Power University
Ordnance Science and Research Academy of China
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North China Electric Power University, Ordnance Science and Research Academy of China filed Critical North China Electric Power University
Priority to CN202010306204.3A priority Critical patent/CN111415102B/en
Publication of CN111415102A publication Critical patent/CN111415102A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111415102B publication Critical patent/CN111415102B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/18Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on an entropy method, which comprises the following steps of 1: analyzing toughness characteristics of the power monitoring system from two different dimensions of time and space; step 2: selecting a plurality of toughness evaluation indexes based on the toughness characteristics, and establishing a toughness evaluation index system for the power monitoring system according to the hierarchical structure of the multi-target decision method; and step 3: the quantitative calculation of the index weight is completed by utilizing an entropy method, the weight value of each toughness evaluation index is obtained, and the influence degree of each toughness evaluation index on the system toughness evaluation is judged according to the weight value; and 4, step 4: and calculating the toughness comprehensive score of the power monitoring system as a toughness quantitative evaluation result of the power monitoring system. The method can realize effective evaluation on the toughness of the power monitoring system and ensure the scientificity and accuracy of the evaluation.

Description

Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method
Technical Field
The invention relates to a toughness evaluation method of a power monitoring system based on an entropy method.
Background
The electric power monitoring system is a neural network and a control center of the whole urban electric power system and is also a foundation for guaranteeing safe and stable operation and electric power reliability of the urban electric power system. Although the safety protection technology of the existing power monitoring system guarantees the safe and stable operation of the power system, with the development of information technology and the continuous evolution of information security policies of all countries, the tendency of nationalization of network attacks is obvious, and the attack aiming at the vulnerability of the power monitoring system becomes an important form of political and economic struggle. Moreover, the continuity, the concealment and the destructiveness of the information security attack are obviously enhanced, the information security protection difficulty is greatly increased, and the power monitoring system faces new network and information security risks in all links of transmission, transformation, distribution, use and scheduling. Meanwhile, when information element faults and information transmission abnormity occur in the power monitoring system, the structure of an information network of the system may be changed or the availability and integrity of information may be damaged, thereby indirectly affecting the stable operation of the primary power system.
The toughness of the power monitoring system may be defined as: under the continuous disturbance of information security, the system keeps normal service function characteristics, and the influence of disturbance on the system is reduced to the maximum extent so as to keep normal and stable operation. It positively describes the ability of the system to cope with random continuous disturbances. With the rapid development of information technology, information security disturbance gradually presents high continuity, high concealment and strong destructiveness, and it is necessary to perform toughness evaluation on a power monitoring system.
At present, no relevant documents exist for defining and evaluating the toughness of the power monitoring system, the definition and the evaluation are still in the primary stage, and how to establish a set of complete toughness evaluation theory and dynamic evaluation indexes of the power monitoring system is the theoretical basis of the system for dealing with the emergency safety event and is also the technical guidance for improving the toughness capability of the system facing internal and external information disturbance.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a toughness evaluation method of an electric power monitoring system based on an entropy method, which can realize effective evaluation of the toughness of the electric power monitoring system.
The technical scheme for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows:
an electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on an entropy method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: analyzing toughness characteristics of the power monitoring system from two different dimensions of time and space;
step 2: selecting a plurality of toughness evaluation indexes based on the toughness characteristics, and establishing a toughness evaluation index system for the power monitoring system according to the hierarchical structure of the multi-target decision method;
and step 3: the quantitative calculation of the index weight is completed by utilizing an entropy method, the weight value of each toughness evaluation index is obtained, and the influence degree of each toughness evaluation index on the system toughness evaluation is judged according to the weight value;
and 4, step 4: calculating the toughness comprehensive score of the power monitoring system as a toughness quantitative evaluation result of the power monitoring system;
the time dimension in the step 1 includes before, when and after the security event occurs, and the space dimension includes physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness and application software toughness.
Further, the toughness evaluation index includes the following four types of indexes: physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness and application software toughness.
Further, the toughness evaluation index further includes management toughness.
Furthermore, four subclasses of indexes are set under the physical toughness index, namely the physical environment condition, the power supply stability, the electromagnetic protection safety and the physical equipment access safety.
Furthermore, four subclasses of indexes are set under the network toughness index, namely intrusion prevention degree, network equipment protection rate, network topology structure and network access security.
Furthermore, four subclass indexes are set under the toughness of the host, namely the encryption authentication degree, the host identity authentication condition, the host access security and the resource control coverage rate.
Furthermore, four subclasses of indexes are set under the toughness of the application software, namely the software fault tolerance rate, the software identity authentication condition, the key program backup condition and the software access safety.
Further, four subclasses of indexes are set under the management toughness index, and are respectively a safety audit period condition, an emergency starting plan formulation condition, a safety management system formulation condition and a system operation and maintenance condition.
Further, the toughness evaluation of the power monitoring system by using an entropy method comprises the following steps:
step 3.1: constructing an evaluation data matrix: m power monitoring systems are arranged, and if n rating indexes are provided, the original index matrix is Z ═ Xij}(i=1、2…m,j=1、2…n);
Step 3.2: index normalization processing:
Figure BDA0002455881150000031
step 3.3: calculating the entropy value of the j index:
Figure BDA0002455881150000032
wherein k is a constant, k >0, ln is a natural logarithm;
step 3.4: and (3) calculating the redundancy degree of the j index:
hj=1-ej
step 3.5: calculating the entropy weight of the index j:
Figure BDA0002455881150000041
step 3.6: and (3) calculating the comprehensive toughness score of each power monitoring system:
Figure BDA0002455881150000042
the invention has the following beneficial effects:
the method establishes four indexes of physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness and application software toughness of the power monitoring system, utilizes an entropy method to evaluate the toughness of the monitoring system, and can realize effective evaluation of the toughness of the power monitoring system. The physical toughness is the basis of toughness analysis of the power monitoring system, and physical protection measures such as physical environment conditions, power supply degree, electromagnetic protection degree and the like are the basis for ensuring power monitoring operation in different stages of network security events; the network toughness reflects the elasticity of a topological structure of the system from the side, and measures such as access control, security audit and the like are adopted to improve the toughness of the system for dealing with emergency security events; the toughness of the host embodies the toughness degree of the power monitoring system in the aspect of host safety, and is the potential capability of the computer-related equipment for resisting safety threat events; the application toughness is the reaction force of the power monitoring service system in response to different stages of the occurrence of the power safety event, and comprises the prevention capacity before the occurrence of the event, the reaction capacity when the safety event occurs and the recovery capacity after the safety event occurs.
The method can also set a management toughness index of the power monitoring system, and based on five major indexes of physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness, application software toughness and management toughness, the toughness of the monitoring system is evaluated by using an entropy method, so that the scientificity and accuracy of the toughness evaluation of the power monitoring system are further ensured.
The method has scientificity, systematicness and operability for selecting the toughness evaluation index of the power monitoring system, effectively ensures effective evaluation of the power monitoring system, and can truly reflect the toughness reaction capability of the power monitoring system under the condition of coping with safety events scientifically; the systematicness and the evaluation index can comprehensively reflect the time and space toughness characteristics of the power monitoring system; the operability and the evaluation index can be qualitatively or quantitatively subjected to statistical analysis so as to conveniently finish the quantification of the toughness evaluation index of the power monitoring system.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a design route diagram of the toughness evaluation method of the power monitoring system based on the entropy method;
FIG. 2 is a time dimension profile of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a spatial dimension profile of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention is described in detail with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings, but it should be understood that these embodiments are not intended to limit the present invention, and those skilled in the art should understand that functional, methodological, or structural equivalents or substitutions made by these embodiments are within the scope of the present invention.
The first embodiment is as follows:
as shown in fig. 1, the method for evaluating toughness of an electric power monitoring system based on an entropy method of the present invention includes the following steps:
step 1: and analyzing toughness characteristics of the power monitoring system from two different dimensions of time and space.
Time dimension feature
For toughness analysis of the power monitoring system, the analysis is divided into a time dimension before occurrence of a safety event, a time dimension when the safety event occurs, and a time dimension after the safety event occurs, as shown in fig. 2. Before a security event occurs, the system toughness is mainly embodied as that the system completes related preparation work before the security event occurs by means of measures such as physical isolation of the system, security partitioning of different systems, timing integrity check and the like; when a safety event occurs, the system flexibly reduces the influence of the safety event on the operation of the system by depending on the established response scheme of the system, thereby improving the toughness reaction capability of the system; after a safety event occurs, the system is restored to the normal working state of the system at the fastest speed by starting an emergency scheme and calling a safety management mechanism and related personnel, and the adverse effect on the system is reduced to the maximum extent.
Spatial dimension feature
The toughness analysis of the power monitoring system is characterized in the following four aspects in spatial dimension: physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness, application toughness, as shown in fig. 3. The physical toughness is the basis of toughness analysis of the power monitoring system, and physical protection measures such as physical environment conditions, power supply degree, electromagnetic protection degree and the like are the basis for ensuring power monitoring operation in different stages of network security events; the network toughness reflects the elasticity of a topological structure of the system from the side, and measures such as access control, security audit and the like are adopted to improve the toughness of the system for dealing with emergency security events; the toughness of the host embodies the toughness degree of the power monitoring system in the aspect of host safety, and is the potential capability of the computer-related equipment for resisting safety threat events; the application toughness is the reaction force of the power monitoring service system in response to different stages of the occurrence of the power safety event, and comprises the prevention capacity before the occurrence of the event, the reaction capacity when the safety event occurs and the recovery capacity after the safety event occurs.
Step 2: selecting a plurality of toughness evaluation indexes based on the toughness characteristics, and establishing a toughness evaluation index system for the power monitoring system according to the hierarchical structure of the multi-target decision method;
as shown in table 1 below, five major indexes (a secondary index criterion layer B) of physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness, application software toughness and management toughness of the power monitoring system are set, and based on the five major indexes, an entropy method is used to evaluate the toughness of the monitoring system.
Four subclasses of indexes (three-level index layer C) are set under the physical toughness index, namely the physical environment condition, the power supply stability, the electromagnetic protection safety and the physical equipment access safety.
Four subclasses of indexes (three-level index layer C) are set under the network toughness index, namely intrusion prevention degree, network equipment protection rate, network topology structure and network access security.
Four subclass indexes (three-level index layer C) are set under the toughness of the host, namely encryption authentication degree, host identity authentication condition, host access security and resource control coverage rate.
Four subclass indexes (a third-level index layer C) are set under the toughness of the application software, namely software fault tolerance, software identity authentication, key program backup and software access safety.
Four subclasses of indexes (a three-level index layer C) are set under the management toughness index and are respectively a safety audit period condition, an emergency starting plan formulation condition, a safety management system formulation condition and a system operation and maintenance condition.
In conclusion, 20 subclasses of indexes (three-grade indexes) are set.
TABLE 1 toughness evaluation index system for power monitoring system
Figure BDA0002455881150000071
And step 3: the quantitative calculation of the index weight is completed by utilizing an entropy method, the weight value of each toughness evaluation index is obtained, and the influence degree of each toughness evaluation index on the system toughness evaluation is judged according to the weight value;
the method for evaluating the toughness of the power monitoring system by using the entropy method comprises the following steps:
step 3.1: constructing an evaluation data matrix: m power monitoring systems are arranged, and if n rating indexes are provided, the original index matrix is Z ═ XijJ (i ═ 1,2 … m, j ═ 1,2 … n); in this embodiment, n is 20.
Step 3.2: index normalization processing:
Figure BDA0002455881150000081
step 3.3: calculating the entropy value of the j index:
Figure BDA0002455881150000082
wherein k is a constant, k >0, ln is a natural logarithm;
step 3.4: and (3) calculating the redundancy degree of the j index:
hj=1-ej
step 3.5: calculating the entropy weight of the index j:
Figure BDA0002455881150000083
step 3.6: and (3) calculating the comprehensive toughness score of each power monitoring system:
Figure BDA0002455881150000084
and 4, step 4: and calculating the toughness comprehensive score of the power monitoring system as a toughness quantitative evaluation result of the power monitoring system.
And (3) quantitative result analysis:
by calculating the entropy weights of the index layers Ci (i ═ 1,2.. n), the weighted values of the toughness of the host, the toughness of the network, the physical toughness, the application toughness and the management toughness in the criterion layer can be obtained, the weighted values are the sum of the entropy weights of different indexes of the corresponding index layers, the influence degree of each index layer on the toughness evaluation of the system is judged according to the value, and the importance degree is positively correlated with the value.
By calculating the comprehensive toughness score of each power monitoring system, the toughness of different power monitoring systems under the same evaluation index system can be determined, and the toughness is relatively higher as the score is higher.
Example two:
in the second embodiment, four types of indexes of physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness and application software toughness of the power monitoring system are set, and based on the four types of indexes, an entropy method is used for evaluating the toughness of the monitoring system, that is, 16 small-scale indexes (three-level indexes) are set in total. The rest is the same as the first embodiment.
The above-listed detailed description is only a specific description of a possible embodiment of the present invention, and they are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and equivalent embodiments or modifications made without departing from the technical spirit of the present invention should be included in the scope of the present invention.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrative embodiments, and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims (9)

1. An electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on an entropy method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: analyzing toughness characteristics of the power monitoring system from two different dimensions of time and space;
step 2: selecting a plurality of toughness evaluation indexes based on the toughness characteristics, and establishing a toughness evaluation index system for the power monitoring system according to the hierarchical structure of the multi-target decision method;
and step 3: the quantitative calculation of the index weight is completed by utilizing an entropy method, the weight value of each toughness evaluation index is obtained, and the influence degree of each toughness evaluation index on the system toughness evaluation is judged according to the weight value;
and 4, step 4: calculating the toughness comprehensive score of the power monitoring system as a toughness quantitative evaluation result of the power monitoring system;
the time dimension in the step 1 includes before, when and after the security event occurs, and the space dimension includes physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness and application software toughness.
2. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein: the toughness evaluation index comprises the following four indexes: physical toughness, network toughness, host toughness and application software toughness.
3. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: the toughness evaluation index further includes management toughness.
4. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: four subclasses of indexes are set under the physical toughness index, namely physical environment condition, power supply stability, electromagnetic protection safety and physical equipment access safety.
5. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: four subclasses of indexes are set under the network toughness index, namely intrusion prevention degree, network equipment protection rate, network topology structure and network access security.
6. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: four subclass indexes are set under the toughness of the host, namely encryption authentication degree, host identity authentication condition, host access security and resource control coverage rate.
7. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: four subclass indexes are set under the toughness of the application software, namely software fault tolerance rate, software identity authentication condition, key program backup condition and software access safety.
8. An entropy value method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to claim 3, wherein: four subclasses of indexes are set under the management toughness index, and are respectively a safety audit period condition, an emergency starting plan formulation condition, a safety management system formulation condition and a system operation and maintenance condition.
9. An entropy method-based power monitoring system toughness evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the method for evaluating the toughness of the power monitoring system by using the entropy method comprises the following steps:
step 3.1: constructing an evaluation data matrix: m power monitoring systems are arranged, and if n rating indexes are provided, the original index matrix is Z ═ Xij}(i=1、2…m,j=1、2…n);
Step 3.2: index normalization processing:
Figure FDA0002455881140000031
step 3.3: calculating the entropy value of the j index:
Figure FDA0002455881140000032
wherein k is a constant, k >0, ln is a natural logarithm;
step 3.4: and (3) calculating the redundancy degree of the j index:
hj=1-ej
step 3.5: calculating the entropy weight of the index j:
Figure FDA0002455881140000033
step 3.6: and (3) calculating the comprehensive toughness score of each power monitoring system:
Figure FDA0002455881140000034
CN202010306204.3A 2020-04-17 2020-04-17 Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method Active CN111415102B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010306204.3A CN111415102B (en) 2020-04-17 2020-04-17 Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010306204.3A CN111415102B (en) 2020-04-17 2020-04-17 Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111415102A true CN111415102A (en) 2020-07-14
CN111415102B CN111415102B (en) 2022-05-20

Family

ID=71494952

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010306204.3A Active CN111415102B (en) 2020-04-17 2020-04-17 Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111415102B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112258060A (en) * 2020-10-28 2021-01-22 中国兵器科学研究院 Enterprise quality information capability evaluation index system and evaluation method
CN113191647A (en) * 2021-05-06 2021-07-30 上海应用技术大学 Urban toughness assessment method for emergency management

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2011101186A4 (en) * 2011-09-16 2011-12-22 Daffara, Phillip Dr Urban (Town & City) Resilience Bench-marker (URB)
CN103646352A (en) * 2013-11-14 2014-03-19 国网上海市电力公司 Electric-power emergency system evaluation model construction method based on frangibility
US20150331063A1 (en) * 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Dynamic Modeling and Resilience for Power Distribution
KR20160144853A (en) * 2015-06-09 2016-12-19 (주)인스타페이 Method, system and recording medium for evaluating the credit on the basis of financial and non-financial factor
CN109409729A (en) * 2018-10-19 2019-03-01 中国环境科学研究院 Oil-gas pipeline surrounding cities Vulnerability Assessment
CN110020815A (en) * 2019-05-07 2019-07-16 云南电网有限责任公司 A kind of comprehensive vulnerability inder calculation method of the grid nodes based on analytic network process

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2011101186A4 (en) * 2011-09-16 2011-12-22 Daffara, Phillip Dr Urban (Town & City) Resilience Bench-marker (URB)
CN103646352A (en) * 2013-11-14 2014-03-19 国网上海市电力公司 Electric-power emergency system evaluation model construction method based on frangibility
US20150331063A1 (en) * 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Dynamic Modeling and Resilience for Power Distribution
KR20160144853A (en) * 2015-06-09 2016-12-19 (주)인스타페이 Method, system and recording medium for evaluating the credit on the basis of financial and non-financial factor
CN109409729A (en) * 2018-10-19 2019-03-01 中国环境科学研究院 Oil-gas pipeline surrounding cities Vulnerability Assessment
CN110020815A (en) * 2019-05-07 2019-07-16 云南电网有限责任公司 A kind of comprehensive vulnerability inder calculation method of the grid nodes based on analytic network process

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BIE ZHAOHONG,LIN YANLING,LI GENGFENG,LI FURONG: "Battling the Extreme: A Study on the Power System Resilience", 《PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE》 *
曹波,吴峥,杨杉,贺欣,程鹏: "电力监控系统脆弱性评估模型研究", 《计算机与数字工程》 *
肖智文,王国庆,朱建明,陈洪钩: "面向突发事件的电网韧性能力评价及构建方法", 《系统工程理论与实践》 *
鞠平,王冲,辛焕海,李洪,江道灼,沈赋: "电力系统的柔性、弹性与韧性研究", 《电力自动化设备》 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112258060A (en) * 2020-10-28 2021-01-22 中国兵器科学研究院 Enterprise quality information capability evaluation index system and evaluation method
CN113191647A (en) * 2021-05-06 2021-07-30 上海应用技术大学 Urban toughness assessment method for emergency management

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111415102B (en) 2022-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107819771B (en) Information security risk assessment method and system based on asset dependency relationship
Xiang et al. A game-theoretic study of load redistribution attack and defense in power systems
Yang et al. Anomaly-based intrusion detection for SCADA systems
CN105516130B (en) Data processing method and device
Lou et al. Defending transportation networks against random and targeted attacks
CN111415102B (en) Electric power monitoring system toughness evaluation method based on entropy method
Lau et al. A cybersecurity insurance model for power system reliability considering optimal defense resource allocation
Murray‐Tuite et al. A methodology for assessing transportation network terrorism risk with attacker and defender interactions
CN111756687B (en) Defense measure configuration method and system for coping with network attack
Zhang et al. A cyber-insurance scheme for water distribution systems considering malicious cyberattacks
Mi et al. A method of entropy weight quantitative risk assessment for the safety and security integration of a typical industrial control system
CN117370970A (en) Fault attack protection method based on random fault injection
CN116405242A (en) Safety state identification method for data acquisition and monitoring system
CN110750795B (en) Information security risk processing method and device
Lan Research on cybersecurity risk assessment in SCADA networks based on AHP-RSR
Ma Research on network vulnerability assessment based on attack graph and security metrics
Tian et al. A cybersecurity risk assessment method and its application for instrumentation and control systems in nuclear power plants
Liu et al. Framework of probabilistic risk assessment for security and reliability
Hou et al. Risk assessment method of distribution CPS based on entropy weight fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
Lopez et al. Using Attack Trees to Assess Security Controls for Supervisory Control and data Acquisition Systems (SCADA)
Qi et al. A combined prediction method of industrial internet security situation based on time series
Schneidewind Reliability-security model
Kosenko et al. Analysis of information-telecommunication network risk based on cognitive maps and cause-effect diagram
CN115842681B (en) Risk assessment method and related device for public and private interactive power service system
He et al. Network Security Analysis of Industrial Control System Based on Attack-Defense Tree

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant