CN111353697A - Method and device for evaluating execution condition of accident handling procedure - Google Patents
Method and device for evaluating execution condition of accident handling procedure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111353697A CN111353697A CN202010121268.6A CN202010121268A CN111353697A CN 111353697 A CN111353697 A CN 111353697A CN 202010121268 A CN202010121268 A CN 202010121268A CN 111353697 A CN111353697 A CN 111353697A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- stage
- standard
- curve
- execution
- target
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 114
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
- G06Q50/2057—Career enhancement or continuing education service
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method and a device for evaluating the execution condition of an accident handling procedure, which comprises the following steps: recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling rule by the student, and obtaining the execution time of each stage according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage; comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene to obtain curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter; comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage; and generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage. By the method and the device, the data are automatically acquired and automatically evaluated, so that the evaluation is more objective.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of safety management of nuclear power plants, in particular to a method and a device for evaluating the execution condition of an accident handling procedure.
Background
At present, the evaluation of the accident handling procedures executed by operators in the nuclear power plant is mainly carried out by training on a full-range simulator according to a preset simulator scene, and teachers observe various performances and unit control effects in the training process of the operators, so that the evaluation of the accident procedures executed by the operators is carried out. However, the method too depends on subjective judgment of the instructor, and due to different attention points and cognition of different instructors, the evaluation result deviation is large, the observation attention of the instructor is limited, all execution information of an operator cannot be captured, and all relevant unit and equipment parameter curves cannot be called in time to observe the control effect, so that the evaluation result is one-sided.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention mainly aims to provide a method and a device for evaluating the execution condition of an accident handling procedure, and aims to solve the technical problem that the accuracy of evaluation of operator accident procedure execution in a manual observation mode in the prior art is low.
In order to achieve the above object, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating execution of an accident handling procedure, where the method includes:
recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling rule by the student, and obtaining the execution time of each stage according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage;
comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene to obtain curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter;
comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage;
and generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage.
Optionally, before the recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time tag of each stage in the process of the student executing the accident handling procedure and obtaining the execution duration of each stage according to the recorded execution time tag of each stage, the method further includes:
and creating standard execution time lengths corresponding to all stages in a standard scene and standard change curves corresponding to all characteristic parameters in the standard scene.
Optionally, the creating of the standard execution time corresponding to each stage in the standard scene and the standard variation curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scene include:
recording qualified change curves of all the characteristic parameters and qualified execution duration of all the stages of N qualified operators in the process of executing the accident handling procedures to obtain N qualified change curves corresponding to all the characteristic parameters and N qualified execution durations corresponding to all the stages;
taking the mean curve of the N qualified change curves corresponding to each characteristic parameter as a standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in a standard scene;
and taking the average time length of the N qualified execution time lengths corresponding to the stages as the standard execution time length corresponding to each stage in a standard scene, wherein N is a positive integer.
Optionally, the generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage includes:
detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages;
and if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference.
Optionally, after the generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage, the method further includes:
and acquiring the target characteristic parameters and/or the improvement strategies corresponding to the target stage, and displaying the improvement strategies.
In addition, to achieve the above object, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an apparatus for evaluating an execution situation of an accident handling procedure, where the apparatus for evaluating an execution situation of an accident handling procedure includes:
the recording module is used for recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling rule by the student, and obtaining the execution duration of each stage according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage;
the comparison module is used for comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene respectively to obtain the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter; comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage;
and the evaluation module is used for generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure further includes:
and the creating module is used for creating the standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in the standard scene and the standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scene.
Optionally, the creating module is configured to:
recording qualified change curves of all the characteristic parameters and qualified execution duration of all the stages of N qualified operators in the process of executing the accident handling procedures to obtain N qualified change curves corresponding to all the characteristic parameters and N qualified execution durations corresponding to all the stages;
taking the mean curve of the N qualified change curves corresponding to each characteristic parameter as a standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in a standard scene;
and taking the average time length of the N qualified execution time lengths corresponding to the stages as the standard execution time length corresponding to each stage in a standard scene, wherein N is a positive integer.
Optionally, the evaluation module is configured to:
detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages;
and if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure further includes:
and the display module is used for acquiring the target characteristic parameters and/or the improvement strategies corresponding to the target stages and displaying the improvement strategies.
In the invention, the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling rule by the student are recorded, and the execution time of each stage is obtained according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage; comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene to obtain curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter; comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage; and generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage. By the aid of the method and the system, the condition that the operator executes the accident handling rule is evaluated without depending on subjective judgment of an instructor, and evaluation is more objective by means of automatic data acquisition and automatic evaluation.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a method for evaluating the performance of an incident handling procedure according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating time stamps of respective sub-stages corresponding to an initial diagnosis stage in an embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the variation of SG water level during an accident handling procedure according to an embodiment;
fig. 4 is a functional block diagram of an embodiment of the device for evaluating the execution of the accident handling procedure according to the present invention.
The implementation, functional features and advantages of the objects of the present invention will be further explained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Detailed Description
It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of an embodiment of the method for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure according to the present invention. In one embodiment, a method of evaluating the performance of an incident treatment protocol includes:
step S10, recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling regulation by the student, and obtaining the execution duration of each stage according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage;
in this embodiment, the accident handling procedure is not limited, and the accident handling procedure may be a simple shutdown and DOS execution procedure, or other accident handling procedures. The execution process of the accident handling procedure is divided into several stages. For example, the execution process of the accident handling procedure is divided into four sub-phases of initial diagnosis, control, monitoring, redirection, and each sub-phase is further subdivided into a plurality of sub-phases. And recording the execution time labels of the sub-stages by the trainees in the process of executing the accident handling rule, so as to obtain the execution time length of each sub-stage. Taking the example of the simple shutdown execution of the DOS protocol, the accident protocol execution process is divided into 4 stages of initial diagnosis, control, monitoring and redirection, and each stage is subdivided into 1 or more stage targets, namely each sub-stage is subdivided into a plurality of sub-stages. The procedural execution logic, as exemplified by a loop operator, can further subdivide the initial diagnostic, control, monitoring, and redirection 4 stages. The initial diagnosis stage is divided into 6 stage targets, a preliminary operation module, shutdown action confirmation, support function diagnosis, primary circuit radioactivity and error dilution diagnosis, primary/secondary circuit leakage diagnosis and orientation-to-stabilization sequence, wherein the targets in each stage are as follows:
① preliminary operation module isolating possible dilution sources;
② confirming that the shutdown action is normal;
③ support function diagnosis, diagnosing whether the support function is lost;
④ diagnosing the radioactivity and dilution error of the primary circuit to determine if the radioactivity of the primary circuit is high or the dilution error occurs;
⑤ one/two-circuit leakage diagnosis, whether one/two-circuit leakage occurs is diagnosed.
The control stage is divided into 5 stage targets, namely a temperature control module, a supply configuration module, an RCV configuration module, a stable loop pressure and a voltage stabilizer liquid level control, wherein the stage targets are as follows:
① temperature control module for controlling loop temperature at required value;
② replenishment configuration module for completing REA replenishment configuration correctly;
③ RCV configuration module for completing RCV configuration correctly;
④ stabilizing the loop pressure by controlling the loop pressure at a desired value;
⑤ controlling the liquid level of the voltage stabilizer to be-4 m-1.4 m.
The monitoring stage has a stage target, and the main pump monitoring module:
① Main Pump monitoring Module, Main Pump monitoring;
the reorientation phase has two phase targets, reorientation diagnosis and exit from the SOP protocol:
① redirect diagnosis;
② exit the SOP procedure.
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of time tags of each sub-division stage corresponding to the initial diagnosis stage in an embodiment. As shown in fig. 2, the execution duration of each phase can be obtained according to the execution time tag of each phase. The SOP accident procedure execution platform can be used for recording execution time tags of all personnel executing each stage of the accident handling procedure, and therefore time data of each stage can be counted.
In the embodiment, the characteristic parameters refer to relevant parameters of six state functions needing attention in the whole accident procedure execution process, for example, a simple shutdown execution DOS procedure, the characteristic parameters include, but are not limited to, intermediate range neutron flux, △ Tsat, pressure vessel water level, SG radioactivity, SG pressure, containment radioactivity, primary circuit average temperature, stabiliser liquid level and primary circuit pressure, variation trend curves of the characteristic parameters can be collected by using an SOP accident procedure execution platform, so that variation curves corresponding to the characteristic parameters are obtained, and referring to FIG. 3, FIG. 3 is a variation curve of the SG water level in the accident procedure execution process in the embodiment.
Step S20, comparing the variation curve of each characteristic parameter with the standard variation curve under the corresponding standard scene respectively to obtain the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter;
in this embodiment, if a change curve a of the average temperature of the loop, a change curve B of the liquid level of the voltage stabilizer, and a change curve C of the pressure of the loop are recorded, the change curve a is compared with a standard change curve a of the average temperature of the loop under a standard scene, the change curve B is compared with a standard change curve B of the liquid level of the voltage stabilizer under the standard scene, and the change curve C is compared with a standard change curve C of the liquid level of the voltage stabilizer under the standard scene. Taking the comparison of the variation curve a with the standard variation curve a as an example, that is, comparing the vertical coordinate difference of the two curves at the same time point, the maximum vertical coordinate difference can be taken as the deviation amplitude of the two curves, that is, the deviation amplitude of the curve corresponding to the average temperature of the primary loop. In the same way, curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to other characteristic parameters can be obtained. Of course, the deviation amplitudes of the two curves can be calculated in other mathematical manners, so that the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters are obtained.
Step S30, comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage;
in this embodiment, the execution duration of each stage is compared with the standard execution duration in the corresponding standard scenario, that is, the execution duration of a certain stage is compared with the standard execution duration in the standard scenario. For example, the execution duration of a stage is T1, and the standard execution duration of the stage under the standard scenario is T2, that is, T1 is compared with T2, and the obtained time difference is the time difference corresponding to the stage. Thus, the time difference corresponding to each stage can be obtained.
And step S40, generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation ranges corresponding to the characteristic parameters and the time differences corresponding to the stages.
In this embodiment, curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and time differences corresponding to the stages are obtained, that is, a plurality of curve deviation amplitudes and a plurality of time differences are obtained. And generating evaluation information with different evaluation grades according to the deviation amplitudes of the curves and the time differences. The overall principle is as follows: the larger the curve deviation width and/or the larger the time difference, the lower the evaluation level of the evaluation information.
For example, a portion to be improved and a level to be improved are determined based on the execution time difference at each stage, the deviation widths of the characteristic parameter curves are classified, the quality of control by the performer is evaluated, and the evaluation is based on the level of the deviation width and whether or not a directional error has occurred. And analyzing the part with higher deviation rate of the rule execution, and determining the reason with higher deviation rate, wherein the reason is divided into solving directions such as training, rule optimization, auxiliary information interface optimization and the like. And (4) counting deviation rates aiming at teams, such as operation values, operation places, all-nuclear power bases and the like, and finding weak items of accident procedures executed by teams at all levels.
In this embodiment, the change curves of the characteristic parameters and the execution time labels of the stages in the process of executing the accident handling procedure by the trainee are recorded, and the execution duration of each stage is obtained according to the recorded execution time labels of the stages; comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene to obtain curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter; comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage; and generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage. Through the embodiment, the condition that the operator executes the accident handling regulation is evaluated without depending on the subjective judgment of the instructor, and the evaluation is more objective through the automatic data acquisition and evaluation mode.
Further, in an embodiment, before step S10, the method further includes:
and creating standard execution time lengths corresponding to all stages in a standard scene and standard change curves corresponding to all characteristic parameters in the standard scene.
In an optional embodiment, the standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in the standard scenario and the standard variation curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scenario may be created based on actual processing experience.
In another optional embodiment, the creating a standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in a standard scenario and a standard variation curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scenario includes:
recording qualified change curves of all the characteristic parameters and qualified execution duration of all the stages of N qualified operators in the process of executing the accident handling procedures to obtain N qualified change curves corresponding to all the characteristic parameters and N qualified execution durations corresponding to all the stages; taking the mean curve of the N qualified change curves corresponding to each characteristic parameter as a standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in a standard scene; and taking the average time length of the N qualified execution time lengths corresponding to the stages as the standard execution time length corresponding to each stage in a standard scene, wherein N is a positive integer.
In this embodiment, after an accident scene introduction is performed on a certain number of qualified operators to make the control strategies and targets clear, a scene test is performed on a simulator, so as to record the execution duration and the characteristic parameter variation curve of each stage corresponding to each qualified operator, select the middle value of the execution duration and the characteristic parameter curve of each stage of all persons as a reference, and create the standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in a standard scene and the standard variation curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scene.
Further, in one embodiment, step S40 includes:
detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages; and if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference.
In this embodiment, when the deviation range of the curve corresponding to a certain characteristic parameter is smaller, it indicates that the change curve of the characteristic parameter is qualified in the process of executing the accident handling procedure by the current trainee, and when the time difference corresponding to a certain stage is smaller, it indicates that the handling action of the current trainee in the process of executing the accident handling procedure is qualified. Therefore, a preset amplitude and a preset time difference can be set according to actual conditions. Detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages; if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, it indicates that the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference are problematic in the process of executing the accident handling procedure by the current student, and therefore, evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference is generated.
Further, in an embodiment, after the step S40, the method further includes:
and acquiring the target characteristic parameters and/or the improvement strategies corresponding to the target stage, and displaying the improvement strategies.
In this embodiment, in addition to generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on a target characteristic parameter corresponding to a target curve deviation amplitude and/or a target stage corresponding to a target time difference, an improvement scheme needs to be further provided. And when target characteristic parameters and/or target stages which need to be improved exist, the improvement strategies corresponding to the target characteristic parameters and/or the target stages are acquired from the stored information, and are displayed, so that the trainee is guided to optimize the operation action.
Referring to fig. 4, fig. 4 is a functional module diagram of an embodiment of the device for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure according to the present invention. In one embodiment, the apparatus for evaluating the performance of an incident treatment protocol comprises:
the recording module 10 is configured to record a change curve of each characteristic parameter and an execution time tag of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling procedure by the trainee, and obtain an execution duration of each stage according to the recorded execution time tag of each stage;
a comparison module 20, configured to compare the variation curve of each feature parameter with a standard variation curve in a corresponding standard scene, respectively, to obtain a curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each feature parameter; comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage;
and the evaluation module 30 is configured to generate evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage.
Further, in an embodiment, the apparatus for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure further includes:
and the creating module 40 is configured to create a standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in a standard scene and a standard variation curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scene.
Further, in an embodiment, the creating module 40 is configured to:
recording qualified change curves of all the characteristic parameters and qualified execution duration of all the stages of N qualified operators in the process of executing the accident handling procedures to obtain N qualified change curves corresponding to all the characteristic parameters and N qualified execution durations corresponding to all the stages;
taking the mean curve of the N qualified change curves corresponding to each characteristic parameter as a standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in a standard scene;
and taking the average time length of the N qualified execution time lengths corresponding to the stages as the standard execution time length corresponding to each stage in a standard scene, wherein N is a positive integer.
Further, in an embodiment, the evaluation module 30 is configured to:
detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages;
and if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference.
Further, in an embodiment, the apparatus for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure further includes:
and the display module is used for acquiring the target characteristic parameters and/or the improvement strategies corresponding to the target stages and displaying the improvement strategies.
The specific embodiment of the apparatus for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure according to the present invention is substantially the same as the embodiments of the method for evaluating the execution condition of the accident handling procedure, and is not described herein again.
It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or system that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or system. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or system that comprises the element.
The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.
Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art will clearly understand that the method of the above embodiments can be implemented by software plus a necessary general hardware platform, and certainly can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases, the former is a better implementation manner. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium (e.g., ROM/RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) as described above and includes instructions for enabling a terminal device (e.g., a mobile phone, a computer, a server, or a network device) to execute the method according to the embodiments of the present invention.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and all modifications of equivalent structures and equivalent processes, which are made by using the contents of the present specification and the accompanying drawings, or directly or indirectly applied to other related technical fields, are included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method of evaluating the performance of an incident treatment protocol, the method comprising:
recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling rule by the student, and obtaining the execution time of each stage according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage;
comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene to obtain curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter;
comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage;
and generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage.
2. The method for evaluating the execution of the accident handling procedure according to claim 1, wherein before the recording the variation curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time tag of each stage during the course of the accident handling procedure performed by the trainee, and obtaining the execution time of each stage according to the recorded execution time tag of each stage, the method further comprises:
and creating standard execution time lengths corresponding to all stages in a standard scene and standard change curves corresponding to all characteristic parameters in the standard scene.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the creating of the standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in the standard scenario and the standard variation curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scenario comprises:
recording qualified change curves of all the characteristic parameters and qualified execution duration of all the stages of N qualified operators in the process of executing the accident handling procedures to obtain N qualified change curves corresponding to all the characteristic parameters and N qualified execution durations corresponding to all the stages;
taking the mean curve of the N qualified change curves corresponding to each characteristic parameter as a standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in a standard scene;
and taking the average time length of the N qualified execution time lengths corresponding to the stages as the standard execution time length corresponding to each stage in a standard scene, wherein N is a positive integer.
4. A method of assessing the performance of an accident management procedure according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the generating assessment information based on the magnitude of curve deviation for each characteristic parameter and the time difference for each phase comprises:
detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages;
and if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference.
5. The method of evaluating the performance of an accident management procedure of claim 4, wherein after generating the evaluation information based on the curve deviation magnitudes corresponding to the respective characteristic parameters and the time differences corresponding to the respective phases, further comprising:
and acquiring the target characteristic parameters and/or the improvement strategies corresponding to the target stage, and displaying the improvement strategies.
6. An apparatus for evaluating the performance of an incident treatment protocol, the apparatus comprising:
the recording module is used for recording the change curve of each characteristic parameter and the execution time label of each stage in the process of executing the accident handling rule by the student, and obtaining the execution duration of each stage according to the recorded execution time labels of each stage;
the comparison module is used for comparing the change curve of each characteristic parameter with a standard change curve under a corresponding standard scene respectively to obtain the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter; comparing the execution duration of each stage with the standard execution duration under the corresponding standard scene to obtain the time difference corresponding to each stage;
and the evaluation module is used for generating evaluation information according to the curve deviation amplitude corresponding to each characteristic parameter and the time difference corresponding to each stage.
7. The apparatus for evaluating the performance of incident treatment procedures of claim 6, further comprising:
and the creating module is used for creating the standard execution duration corresponding to each stage in the standard scene and the standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the standard scene.
8. The apparatus for evaluating performance of an incident treatment protocol of claim 7, wherein the creation module is to:
recording qualified change curves of all the characteristic parameters and qualified execution duration of all the stages of N qualified operators in the process of executing the accident handling procedures to obtain N qualified change curves corresponding to all the characteristic parameters and N qualified execution durations corresponding to all the stages;
taking the mean curve of the N qualified change curves corresponding to each characteristic parameter as a standard change curve corresponding to each characteristic parameter in a standard scene;
and taking the average time length of the N qualified execution time lengths corresponding to the stages as the standard execution time length corresponding to each stage in a standard scene, wherein N is a positive integer.
9. An apparatus for assessing performance of an incident handling protocol according to any one of claims 6 to 8, wherein the assessment module is configured to:
detecting whether a target curve deviation amplitude larger than a preset amplitude exists in the curve deviation amplitudes corresponding to the characteristic parameters and detecting whether a target time difference larger than a preset time difference exists in the time differences corresponding to the stages;
and if the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target time difference exist, generating evaluation information for prompting improvement on the target characteristic parameter corresponding to the target curve deviation amplitude and/or the target stage corresponding to the target time difference.
10. The apparatus for evaluating the performance of incident treatment procedures of claim 9, further comprising:
and the display module is used for acquiring the target characteristic parameters and/or the improvement strategies corresponding to the target stages and displaying the improvement strategies.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010121268.6A CN111353697A (en) | 2020-02-26 | 2020-02-26 | Method and device for evaluating execution condition of accident handling procedure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010121268.6A CN111353697A (en) | 2020-02-26 | 2020-02-26 | Method and device for evaluating execution condition of accident handling procedure |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111353697A true CN111353697A (en) | 2020-06-30 |
Family
ID=71197383
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010121268.6A Pending CN111353697A (en) | 2020-02-26 | 2020-02-26 | Method and device for evaluating execution condition of accident handling procedure |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111353697A (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101702274A (en) * | 2009-11-10 | 2010-05-05 | 西南石油大学 | Portable drilling simulation system and operation method thereof |
| CN102024091A (en) * | 2009-09-17 | 2011-04-20 | 上海市电力公司超高压输变电公司 | Intelligent evaluation system for simulation training in substation based on terminal logics |
| CN106779294A (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2017-05-31 | 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 | Airplane operation error detection method and system |
-
2020
- 2020-02-26 CN CN202010121268.6A patent/CN111353697A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102024091A (en) * | 2009-09-17 | 2011-04-20 | 上海市电力公司超高压输变电公司 | Intelligent evaluation system for simulation training in substation based on terminal logics |
| CN101702274A (en) * | 2009-11-10 | 2010-05-05 | 西南石油大学 | Portable drilling simulation system and operation method thereof |
| CN106779294A (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2017-05-31 | 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 | Airplane operation error detection method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107832774A (en) | A kind of page exception detection method and device | |
| CN108446197A (en) | A kind of control protection board automatic checkout system and method | |
| CN110968864B (en) | Emergency response processing method and device for security event | |
| MXPA01009656A (en) | Simulator cart. | |
| US20230344857A1 (en) | Multidimensional security situation real-time representation method and system and applicable to network security | |
| KR102069442B1 (en) | The operation support and monitoring system in the nuclear power plant | |
| CN115392037A (en) | Equipment fault prediction method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111814354B (en) | Simulation test method, system, medium and electronic device for instrument performance | |
| CN113889271A (en) | Mental health test method and device for students | |
| CN106815137A (en) | Ui testing method and apparatus | |
| US20220113714A1 (en) | Integrity index detecting method for device by means of control output signal | |
| CN110400044A (en) | Transformer equipment live detection moves operational method, terminal and platform | |
| JPH06309585A (en) | Pre-alarm device | |
| CN114295930A (en) | Power system fault processing aid decision-making method, device and equipment | |
| CN112905451B (en) | Automatic testing method and device for application program | |
| CN111353697A (en) | Method and device for evaluating execution condition of accident handling procedure | |
| CN117112403A (en) | Product automatic testing method, device, system and photovoltaic equipment | |
| CN114942890B (en) | User interface testing method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN116308121A (en) | Inspection prompting device, method and equipment for power equipment | |
| CN101025746B (en) | Method and apparatus for inferring relationships between test results | |
| CN114691903A (en) | Intelligent course testing method and system, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| Braarud et al. | A graded approach to the human factors validation of turbine control system digital upgrade and control room modernization | |
| Spurgin et al. | Advanced simulator data mining for operators’ performance assessment | |
| CN110134108B (en) | Code defect testing method and device | |
| CN116825140B (en) | Voice interaction method and system for standardizing action flow in operation ticket |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |