CN111310940B - Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system - Google Patents
Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111310940B CN111310940B CN201911425464.6A CN201911425464A CN111310940B CN 111310940 B CN111310940 B CN 111310940B CN 201911425464 A CN201911425464 A CN 201911425464A CN 111310940 B CN111310940 B CN 111310940B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- maintenance
- equipment
- year
- annual
- inspection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for rating maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system equipment, which comprises the steps of calculating periodic maintenance working hours and annual fault handling working hours by analyzing the type, maintenance characteristics and maintenance mode of urban rail transit equipment, constructing a personnel rating algorithm based on the total working hours of an annual maintenance plan, and finally measuring and calculating the quantity of personnel. The method has the advantages of high algorithm precision, simplicity, high scientificity, resource saving and efficiency improvement.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of rating of rail transit equipment maintainers, and particularly relates to a method for rating equipment maintainers of an urban rail transit signal system.
Background
At present, the existing personnel quota is more about the personnel configuration optimization of an enterprise operation line, and the following defects exist: the method is suitable for relatively few rating related researches of equipment maintenance personnel of the urban rail transit signal system; secondly, the labor quota assessment research has more problems from theory to practice, such as quota definition, working contents of different work types and measurement units of the working quota.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to develop a method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system.
The technical solution for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows: a method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system comprises the following specific steps:
step 1, analyzing a maintenance mode of urban rail transit equipment, and dividing the mode into daily maintenance, weekly inspection, monthly inspection, seasonal inspection, semi-annual inspection and annual inspection; counting the maintenance modes and the number of different devices and the unit maintenance duration in different maintenance modes, and performing step 2;
step 2, calculating the total time of a maintenance plan of certain equipment needing daily maintenance;
step 3, counting the total amount of the signal system equipment and the total man-hour of the maintenance plan to obtain the total man-hour of all the equipment maintenance plans;
step 4, acquiring annual fault handling man-hours according to the number of monthly faults and the average fault maintenance man-hours;
step 5, accounting annual maintenance total working hours according to standard operation efficiency;
step 6, calculating annual maintenance man-hour of each person;
and 7, calculating the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
Wherein, in the step 2, the total time of the maintenance plan of the daily maintenance equipment is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q 11 ＝A 1 ×T 11 ×m 11
in the formula, the number of years of daily maintenance of one device is assumed to be A 1 Annual inspection times are A 2 The number of years in monthly test is A 3 The annual number of season check is A 4 The number of year of half year examination is A 5 Annual inspection times are A 6 (ii) a The number of daily maintenance years of one device is 11, and the unit daily maintenance time of the device 11 is T 11 The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m 11 The total time of maintenance planning Q of the equipment 11 can be obtained 11 。
Wherein, the total man-hour of the maintenance plans of all the devices is calculated in the step 3, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
wherein i and j respectively represent the j dimension value of the ith individual, and the daily maintenance annual number of the equipment is A 1 Annual inspection times are A 2 The number of years of monthly examinations is A 3 The annual number of season check is A 4 The number of year of half year examination is A 5 Annual inspection times are A 6 ；
The equipment needing daily maintenance is 11, 12, 13, … … and 1n, the equipment needing weekly inspection is 21, 22, 23, … … and 2n, the equipment needing monthly inspection is 31, 32, 33, … … and 3n, the equipment needing quarterly inspection is 41, 42, 43, … … and 4n, the equipment needing semiannual inspection is 51, 52, 53, … … and 5n, and the equipment needing annual inspection is 61, 62, 63, … … and 6n (the same equipment can appear in different repair courses);
the daily maintenance time per unit of the equipment 11 is T 11 The daily inspection time of 12 units of equipment is T 12 And the daily inspection time of 13 units of equipment is T 13 By analogy, the daily maintenance time of the equipment 1n is T 1n . Similarly, the unit cycle inspection time of the equipment 2n is T 2n The 3n unit monthly test time of the equipment is T 3n The 4n unit season check time of the equipment is T 4n The half-year inspection time of 5n units of equipment is T 5n The annual inspection time of the equipment 6n unit is T 6n ；
The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m 11 (ii) a The number of the equipments 12 for daily maintenance is m 12 The number of the equipments 13 for daily maintenance is m 13 By analogy, the number of the equipment 1n for daily maintenance is m 1n . The same can be obtained, the number of the week check 2n is m 2n The number of monthly checks 3n is m 3n The number of season check 4n is m 4n The number of 5n in the half-year test is m 5n The number of annual inspection 6n is m 6n ；
In the step 4, the calculation year fault processing man-hour is realized by the following algorithm:
Q annual fault ＝F×T F ×12
Wherein F is the number of monthly failures and T F For mean time between failure and repair, 12 months of the year, Q Annual fault Working hours for annual fault handling;
wherein, the total maintenance man-hour in the calculation year in the step 5 is realized by the following algorithm:
Q on duty a year ＝V×52×8
Q Major guarantee of year ＝8·a·b
Q Others ＝52×8·b
Q＝Q Detection of +Q Annual fault +Q On duty a year +Q Major guarantee of year +Q Others
In the formula, V is the number of days on duty required by urban rail transit workers each week, 52 refers to the number of weeks included in one year, and 8 refers to the working time of the workers in one day. a is the major guarantee days (rest days) of the year, and b is the number of people required to be guaranteed in major accidents. Q Annual valueClass Is the number of hours on duty per year, Q Major guarantee of year For a major guarantee of the number of man hours per year, Q Others are For maintenance man-hour, Q is the total man-hour of annual maintenance;
in the step 6, the annual maintenance man-hour of each person is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q each person ＝8×(365-d-e-2×52)-52·c
c is the man-hour of the comprehensive management of the per-year-per-year, d is the holiday days such as the per-year-per-year holiday and the event, e is the day of the legal holiday, Q Each person The total working hours are maintained for each person year;
wherein, in the step 7, the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
R＝Q(λ·Q each person )
Lambda is the total working hour utilization rate (value is calculated according to a measurement and calculation description matrix table, the value is generally 0.9), and R is the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
Compared with the existing algorithm, the method has the remarkable advantages that: (1) the invention is suitable for the quota of the maintenance personnel of the urban rail transit signal system equipment, and the working quota unit is working hours; (2) the working hour calculation method is provided, the algorithm is high in precision, simple and easy, high in scientificity, resource saving and efficiency improving.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for quoting maintenance personnel for equipment of an urban rail transit signal system according to the invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the drawings and examples.
A method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system comprises the following specific steps:
(1) analyzing maintenance modes of the urban rail transit equipment, and dividing the modes into daily maintenance, weekly check, monthly check, seasonal check, semi-annual check and annual check; counting the maintenance modes and the number of different devices and the unit maintenance duration in different maintenance modes;
suppose the daily annual number of maintenance of a piece of equipment is A 1 The annual number of annual inspection is A 2 Annual number of monthly examinationsNumber A 3 The annual number of season check is A 4 The number of year of half year examination is A 5 Annual inspection times are A 6 ；
(2) Calculating the total time of a maintenance plan of certain equipment needing daily maintenance, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Q 11 ＝A 1 ×T 11 ×m 11
in the formula, it is assumed that one device requiring daily maintenance is 11, and the unit daily maintenance time of the device 11 is T 11 The number of daily maintenance equipment 11 is m 11 The total time of maintenance planning Q of the equipment 11 can be obtained 11 ；
(3) And obtaining the total man hours of all equipment maintenance plans, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
wherein i and j respectively represent the j dimension value of the ith individual, and the daily maintenance annual number of the equipment is A 1 The annual number of annual inspection is A 2 The number of years of monthly examinations is A 3 The annual number of season check is A 4 The number of year of half year examination is A 5 Annual inspection times are A 6 ；
The equipment needing daily maintenance is 11, 12, 13, … … and 1n, the equipment needing weekly inspection is 21, 22, 23, … … and 2n, the equipment needing monthly inspection is 31, 32, 33, … … and 3n, the equipment needing quarterly inspection is 41, 42, 43, … … and 4n, the equipment needing semi-annual inspection is 51, 52, 53, … … and 5n, the equipment needing annual inspection is 61, 62, 63, … … and 6n, and the same equipment can appear in different repair courses;
the daily maintenance time per unit of the equipment 11 is T 11 The daily inspection time of 12 units of equipment is T 12 And the daily inspection time of 13 units of equipment is T 13 By analogy, the daily maintenance time of the equipment 1n is T 1n (ii) a Similarly, the unit cycle inspection time of the equipment 2n is T 2n The 3n unit monthly test time of the equipment is T 3n The 4n unit season check time of the equipment is T 4n The half-year inspection time of 5n units of equipment is T 5n The annual inspection time of the equipment 6n unit is T 6n ；
The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m 11 (ii) a The number of the equipments 12 for daily maintenance is m 12 The number of the equipments 13 for daily maintenance is m 13 By analogy, the number of the equipment 1n for daily maintenance is m 1n (ii) a Similarly, the number of the weekly inspection 2n is m 2n The number of monthly checks 3n is m 3n The number of season check 4n is m 4n The number of 5n in the half-year test is m 5n The number of annual inspection 6n is m 6n ；
(4) Obtaining annual fault processing man-hour, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Q annual fault ＝F×T F ×12
Wherein F is the number of monthly failures and T F For mean time between failure and repair, 12 months of the year, Q Annual fault Working hours for annual fault handling;
(5) and (3) accounting the annual maintenance total working hours according to the standard operation efficiency, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Q on duty a year ＝V×52×8
Q Major guarantee of year ＝8·a·b
Q Others are ＝52×8·b
Q＝Q Examination of +Q Year fault +Q On duty each year +Q Major guarantee of year +Q Others
In the formula, V is the duty days needed by urban rail transit workers each week, 52 refers to the number of weeks contained in one year, and 8 refers to the working time of the workers in one day. a is the major guarantee days of the year, namely the rest day, and b is the number of guarantee people required by major accidents; q On duty a year For working hours on duty every year, Q Major guarantee of year For a major guarantee of working hours per year, Q Others For other maintenance man-hours, Q is the total man-hour of annual maintenance;
(6) and obtaining annual maintenance man-hour of each person, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Q each person ＝8×(365-d-e-2×52)-52·c
c is the man-hour of the comprehensive management of the per-year-per-year, d is the number of days of holidays such as the per-year-per-year and the like, and e is the statutory festival-per-yearDays of the day, Q Each person The total working hours are maintained for each person year;
(7) obtaining the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
R＝Q(λ·Q each person )
Lambda is the total working hour utilization rate (value is calculated according to a measurement and calculation description matrix table, and the value is generally 0.9), and R is the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
Claims (7)
1. A method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, analyzing a maintenance mode of urban rail transit equipment, and dividing the mode into daily maintenance, weekly inspection, monthly inspection, seasonal inspection, semi-annual inspection and annual inspection; counting the maintenance modes and the number of different devices and the unit maintenance duration in different maintenance modes, and performing step 2;
step 2, calculating the total man-hour of a maintenance plan of certain equipment needing daily maintenance;
step 3, counting the total amount of the signal system equipment and the total maintenance plan working hours to obtain the total maintenance plan working hours of all the equipment;
step 4, acquiring annual fault handling man-hours according to the number of monthly faults and the average fault maintenance man-hours;
step 5, accounting annual maintenance total working hours according to standard operation efficiency;
step 6, calculating annual maintenance man-hour of each person;
and 7, calculating the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: and (3) calculating the total overhaul plan man-hour of the daily maintenance equipment in the step 2, wherein the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q 11 ＝A 1 ×T 11 ×m 11
in the formula, the number of years of daily maintenance of one device is assumed to be A 1 (ii) a Equipment for daily maintenance of one equipmentIs prepared as 11, and the daily maintenance time of the unit of the equipment 11 is T 11 The number of daily maintenance equipment 11 is m 11 The total time of maintenance planning Q of the equipment 11 can be obtained 11 。
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: and 3, calculating the total maintenance plan man-hour of all the equipment, wherein the algorithm is realized as follows:
wherein i and j respectively represent the j dimension value of the ith individual, and the daily maintenance annual number of the equipment is A 1 Annual inspection times are A 2 The number of years of monthly examinations is A 3 The annual number of season check is A 4 The number of year of half year examination is A 5 Annual inspection times are A 6 ；
The equipment needing daily maintenance is 11, 12, 13, … … and 1n, the equipment needing weekly inspection is 21, 22, 23, … … and 2n, the equipment needing monthly inspection is 31, 32, 33, … … and 3n, the equipment needing quarterly inspection is 41, 42, 43, … … and 4n, the equipment needing semi-annual inspection is 51, 52, 53, … … and 5n, the equipment needing annual inspection is 61, 62, 63, … … and 6n, and the same equipment can appear in different repair courses;
the daily maintenance time per unit of the equipment 11 is T 11 The daily inspection time of 12 units of equipment is T 12 And the daily inspection time of 13 units of equipment is T 13 By analogy, the daily maintenance time of the equipment 1n is T 1n (ii) a Similarly, the unit cycle inspection time of the equipment 2n is T 2n The 3n unit monthly test time of the equipment is T 3n The 4n unit season check time of the equipment is T 4n The unit half-year inspection time of the equipment 5n is T 5n The annual inspection time of the equipment 6n unit is T 6n ；
The number of the daily maintenance equipment 11 is m 11 (ii) a The number of the equipments 12 for daily maintenance is m 12 The number of the equipments 13 for daily maintenance is m 13 Thereby, it is possible to obtainBy analogy, the number of the daily maintenance devices 1n is m 1n (ii) a Similarly, the number of the weekly inspection 2n is m 2n The number of monthly checks 3n is m 3n The number of season check 4n is m 4n The number of 5n in the half-year test is m 5n The number of annual inspection 6n is m 6n 。
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: in the calculation year fault processing working hours in the step 4, the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q annual fault ＝F×T F ×12
Wherein F is the number of monthly failures and T F For mean time between failure and repair, 12 months of the year, Q Year fault The year failure processing time is.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: and 5, calculating the annual maintenance total man-hour, wherein the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q on duty a year ＝V×52×8
Q Major guarantee of year ＝8·a·b
Q Others are ＝52×8·b
Q＝Q Examination of +Q Year fault +Q On duty a year +Q Major guarantee of year +Q Others
In the formula, V is the number of days on duty required by urban rail transit workers each week, 52 refers to the number of weeks contained in one year, and 8 refers to the working time of the workers in one day; a is the important guarantee days of the year, namely the rest day, and b is the guarantee number required by major accidents; q On duty a year Is the number of hours on duty per year, Q Major guarantee of year For a major guarantee of the number of man hours per year, Q Others The maintenance man-hour is Q, and the annual maintenance total man-hour is Q.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: in the step 6, the annual maintenance man-hour of each person is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q each person ＝8×(365-d-e-2×52)-52·c
c is the man-hour of the comprehensive management of the per-year-per-year, d is the days of the per-year-per-year holidays and the holidays, e is the days of the legal festivals and holidays, Q Each person The total man-hour is maintained for each person.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: in the step 7, the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
R＝Q/(λ·Q each person )
Lambda is the total working hour utilization rate, and R is the quota of urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911425464.6A CN111310940B (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2019-12-31 | Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911425464.6A CN111310940B (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2019-12-31 | Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111310940A CN111310940A (en) | 2020-06-19 |
| CN111310940B true CN111310940B (en) | 2022-09-27 |
Family
ID=71161572
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911425464.6A Active CN111310940B (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2019-12-31 | Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111310940B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113392996A (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2021-09-14 | 中国人民解放军32181部队 | Guarantee task model construction method based on minimum task unit |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104361439A (en) * | 2014-11-04 | 2015-02-18 | 罗劲 | Elevator maintenance time calculating method |
| JP5679537B1 (en) * | 2014-03-27 | 2015-03-04 | ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 | Personnel allocation planning apparatus and method, and program |
| CN109272158A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-01-25 | 安徽云轨信息科技有限公司 | A kind of city railway vehicle frame overhaul system and method |
-
2019
- 2019-12-31 CN CN201911425464.6A patent/CN111310940B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5679537B1 (en) * | 2014-03-27 | 2015-03-04 | ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 | Personnel allocation planning apparatus and method, and program |
| CN104361439A (en) * | 2014-11-04 | 2015-02-18 | 罗劲 | Elevator maintenance time calculating method |
| CN109272158A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-01-25 | 安徽云轨信息科技有限公司 | A kind of city railway vehicle frame overhaul system and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111310940A (en) | 2020-06-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111259334B (en) | Abnormal water consumption monitoring and early warning method for large users of industrial enterprises | |
| US20120271670A1 (en) | Methods, technology, and systems for quickly enhancing the operating and financial performance of energy systems at large facilities, interpreting usual and unusual patterns in energy consumption, identifying, quantifying, and monetizing hidden operating and financial waste, and accurately measuring the results of implemented energy management solutions, in the shortest amount of time with minimal cost and effort | |
| US20140350989A1 (en) | Maintenance procedure system and method | |
| CN104123590A (en) | 95598 customer service center operation monitoring system and method | |
| CN104794554A (en) | Electric power marketing inspection monitoring system based on software platform support | |
| CN109214682A (en) | The job performance of a kind of couple of employee carries out the method and system of quantitative assessment | |
| CN111310940B (en) | Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system | |
| CN107085746A (en) | A kind of elevator maintenance enterprise management system based on cloud platform | |
| Wang et al. | Does transportation mean transplantation? Impact of new airline routes on sharing of cadaveric kidneys | |
| Al-Zubaidi et al. | Maintenance manpower modelling for a hospital building complex | |
| CN114818382A (en) | Green assessment method for carbon emission of enterprise | |
| CN117078209A (en) | Method, system and device for managing supervision project and computer storage medium | |
| CN107220921B (en) | Verification method for data collected by energy consumption online monitoring system | |
| Hjalmarsson et al. | Quantifying leanness combining value stream mapping with a data envelopment analysis based method—a case study at a Swedish logistics company | |
| Duffuaa et al. | Systematic and effective maintenance capacity planning | |
| Ramadani et al. | Performance Analysis of Road and Bridge Planning Consultants in Highway Work in Banjarbakula | |
| Carvalho et al. | Total Quality Management: the case of an electricity distribution company | |
| CN112287293A (en) | Method and device for repairing passenger flow data | |
| Alkhalidi et al. | Guidelines for establishing water energy balance database–implementation barriers and recommendations | |
| JP7334528B2 (en) | Power generation cost calculation server for hydroelectric power station, power generation cost calculation system for hydroelectric power station, and power generation cost calculation method for hydroelectric power station | |
| CN109978298A (en) | A kind of manufacturing industry duties Information Management System | |
| CN107154870A (en) | A kind of flow monitoring method based on power automatic system | |
| TWI768201B (en) | An evaluation of credit and loan rating of simulation systems | |
| CN115936329A (en) | Intelligent management and control method for power grid power failure plan | |
| Wildermuth et al. | Evaluation of the Maintenance Management Information Systems of the United States Postal Service |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |