CN111310940A - Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system - Google Patents

Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111310940A
CN111310940A CN201911425464.6A CN201911425464A CN111310940A CN 111310940 A CN111310940 A CN 111310940A CN 201911425464 A CN201911425464 A CN 201911425464A CN 111310940 A CN111310940 A CN 111310940A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
maintenance
equipment
annual
year
inspection
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201911425464.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111310940B (en
Inventor
徐永能
王笑天
范博
彭佳欣
陈亚鑫
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing University of Science and Technology filed Critical Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201911425464.6A priority Critical patent/CN111310940B/en
Publication of CN111310940A publication Critical patent/CN111310940A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111310940B publication Critical patent/CN111310940B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for rating maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system equipment, which comprises the steps of calculating periodic maintenance working hours and annual fault handling working hours by analyzing the type, maintenance characteristics and maintenance mode of urban rail transit equipment, constructing a personnel rating algorithm based on the total working hours of an annual maintenance plan, and finally measuring and calculating the quantity of personnel. The method has the advantages of high algorithm precision, simplicity, high scientificity, resource saving and efficiency improvement.

Description

Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of rating of rail transit equipment maintainers, and particularly relates to a method for rating equipment maintainers of an urban rail transit signal system.
Background
The existing personnel quota is more and relates to personnel configuration optimization of an enterprise operation line, and the defects that ① is suitable for less related research on the quota of equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system, ② labor quota assessment research has more problems from theory to practice, such as quota definition, and working contents of different work types and measurement units of the working quota are not solved.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to develop a method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system.
The technical solution for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows: a method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system comprises the following specific steps:
step 1, analyzing a maintenance mode of urban rail transit equipment, and dividing the mode into daily maintenance, weekly inspection, monthly inspection, seasonal inspection, semi-annual inspection and annual inspection; counting the maintenance modes and the number of different devices and the unit maintenance duration in different maintenance modes, and performing step 2;
step 2, calculating the total time of a maintenance plan of certain equipment needing daily maintenance;
step 3, counting the total amount of the signal system equipment and the total maintenance plan working hours to obtain the total maintenance plan working hours of all the equipment;
step 4, acquiring annual fault handling man-hours according to the number of monthly faults and the average fault maintenance man-hours;
step 5, accounting annual maintenance total working hours according to standard operation efficiency;
step 6, calculating annual maintenance man-hour of each person;
and 7, calculating the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
Wherein, in the step 2, the total time of the maintenance plan of the daily maintenance equipment is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q11＝A1×T11×m11
in the formula, the number of years of daily maintenance of one device is assumed to be A1The annual number of annual inspection is A2The number of years of monthly examinations is A3The annual number of season check is A4The number of year of half year examination is A5Annual inspection times are A6(ii) a The number of daily maintenance years of one device is 11, and the unit daily maintenance time of the device 11 is T11The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m11The total time of maintenance planning Q of the equipment 11 can be obtained11。
Wherein, the total man-hour of the maintenance plans of all the devices is calculated in the step 3, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Figure BDA0002353465330000021
wherein i and j respectively represent the j dimension value of the ith individual, and the daily maintenance annual number of the equipment is A1The annual number of annual inspection is A2The number of years of monthly examinations is A3The annual number of season check is A4The number of year of half year examination is A5Annual inspection times are A6；
The equipment needing daily maintenance is 11, 12, 13, … … and 1n, the equipment needing weekly inspection is 21, 22, 23, … … and 2n, the equipment needing monthly inspection is 31, 32, 33, … … and 3n, the equipment needing quarterly inspection is 41, 42, 43, … … and 4n, the equipment needing semiannual inspection is 51, 52, 53, … … and 5n, and the equipment needing annual inspection is 61, 62, 63, … … and 6n (the same equipment can appear in different repair courses);
the daily maintenance time per unit of the equipment 11 is T11The daily inspection time of 12 units of equipment is T12And the daily inspection time of 13 units of equipment is T13By analogy, the daily maintenance time of the equipment 1n is T1n. Similarly, the unit cycle inspection time of the equipment 2n is T2nThe 3n unit monthly test time of the equipment is T3nThe 4n unit season check time of the equipment is T4nThe half-year inspection time of 5n units of equipment is T5nThe annual inspection time of the equipment 6n unit is T6n；
The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m11(ii) a The number of the equipments 12 for daily maintenance is m12The number of the equipments 13 for daily maintenance is m13By analogy, the number of the equipment 1n for daily maintenance is m1n. Similarly, the number of the weekly inspection 2n is m2nThe number of monthly checks 3n is m3nThe number of season check 4n is m4nThe number of 5n in the half-year test is m5nThe number of annual inspection 6n is m6n；
In the step 4, the calculation year fault processing man-hour is realized by the following algorithm:
Qannual fault＝F×TF×12
Wherein F is the number of monthly failures and TFFor mean time between failure and repair, 12 months of the year, QAnnual faultWorking hours for annual fault handling;
wherein, the total maintenance man-hour in the calculation year in the step 5 is realized by the following algorithm:
Qon duty a year＝V×52×8
QMajor guarantee of year＝8·a·b
QOthers＝52×8·b
Q＝QDetection of+QAnnual fault+QOn duty a year+QMajor guarantee of year+QOthers
In the formula, V is the number of days on duty required by urban rail transit workers each week, 52 refers to the number of weeks included in one year, and 8 refers to the working time of the workers in one day. a is the number of days of major guarantee per year (day of rest), and b is the number of people required for major accidents. QOn duty a yearIs the number of hours on duty per year, QMajor guarantee of yearFor a major guarantee of the number of man hours per year, QOthersFor maintenance man-hour, Q is the total man-hour of annual maintenance;
in the step 6, the annual maintenance man-hour of each person is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Qeach person＝8×(365-d-e-2×52)-52·c
c is the man-hour of the comprehensive management of the per-year-per-year, d is the holiday days such as the per-year-per-year holiday and the event, e is the day of the legal holiday, QEach personThe total working hours are maintained for each person year;
wherein, in the step 7, the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
R＝Q(λ·Qeach person)
Lambda is the total working hour utilization rate (value is calculated according to a measurement and calculation description matrix table, the value is generally 0.9), and R is the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
Compared with the existing algorithm, the method has the remarkable advantages that: (1) the invention is suitable for the quota of the maintenance personnel of the urban rail transit signal system equipment, and the working quota unit is working hours; (2) the working hour calculation method is provided, the algorithm is high in precision, simple and easy, high in scientificity, resource saving and efficiency improving.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for quoting maintenance personnel for equipment of an urban rail transit signal system according to the invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the drawings and examples.
A method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system comprises the following specific steps:
(1) analyzing a maintenance mode of the urban rail transit equipment, and dividing the mode into daily maintenance, weekly check, monthly check, seasonal check, semi-annual check and annual check; counting the maintenance modes and the number of different devices and the unit maintenance duration in different maintenance modes;
suppose that the daily maintenance annual number of one device is A1The annual number of annual inspection is A2The number of years of monthly examinations is A3The annual number of season check is A4The number of year of half year examination is A5Annual inspection times are A6；
(2) Calculating the total time of a maintenance plan of certain equipment needing daily maintenance, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Q11＝A1×T11×m11
in the formula, it is assumed that one device requiring daily maintenance is 11, and the unit daily maintenance time of the device 11 is T11The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m11The total time of maintenance planning Q of the equipment 11 can be obtained11；
(3) And obtaining the total man hours of all equipment maintenance plans, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002353465330000041
wherein i and j respectively represent the j dimension value of the ith individual, and the daily maintenance annual number of the equipment is A1The annual number of annual inspection is A2The number of years of monthly examinations is A3The annual number of season check is A4The number of year of half year examination is A5Annual inspection times are A6；
The equipment needing daily maintenance is 11, 12, 13, … … and 1n, the equipment needing weekly inspection is 21, 22, 23, … … and 2n, the equipment needing monthly inspection is 31, 32, 33, … … and 3n, the equipment needing quarterly inspection is 41, 42, 43, … … and 4n, the equipment needing semi-annual inspection is 51, 52, 53, … … and 5n, the equipment needing annual inspection is 61, 62, 63, … … and 6n, and the same equipment can appear in different repair courses;
the daily maintenance time per unit of the equipment 11 is T11The daily inspection time of 12 units of equipment is T12And the daily inspection time of 13 units of equipment is T13By analogy, the daily maintenance time of the equipment 1n is T1n(ii) a Similarly, the unit cycle inspection time of the equipment 2n is T2nThe 3n unit monthly test time of the equipment is T3nThe 4n unit season check time of the equipment is T4nThe half-year inspection time of 5n units of equipment is T5nThe annual inspection time of the equipment 6n unit is T6n；
The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m11(ii) a The number of the equipments 12 for daily maintenance is m12The number of the equipments 13 for daily maintenance is m13By analogy, the number of the equipment 1n for daily maintenance is m1n(ii) a Similarly, the number of the weekly inspection 2n is m2nThe number of monthly checks 3n is m3nThe number of season check 4n is m4nThe number of 5n in the half-year test is m5nThe number of annual inspection 6n is m6n；
(4) Obtaining annual fault processing man-hour, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Qannual fault＝F×TF×12
Wherein F is the number of monthly failures and TFFor mean time between failure and repair, 12 months of the year, QAnnual faultWorking hours for annual fault handling;
(5) and (3) accounting the annual maintenance total working hours according to the standard operation efficiency, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Qon duty a year＝V×52×8
QMajor guarantee of year＝8·a·b
QOthers＝52×8·b
Q＝QDetection of+QAnnual fault+QOn duty a year+QMajor guarantee of year+QOthers
In the formula, V is the number of days on duty required by urban rail transit workers each week, 52 refers to the number of weeks included in one year, and 8 refers to the working time of the workers in one day. a is the important guarantee days of the year, namely the rest day, and b is the guarantee number required by major accidents; qOn duty a yearFor working hours on duty every year, QMajor guarantee of yearFor great guarantee of working hours per year, QOthersFor other maintenance man-hours, Q is the total man-hour of annual maintenance;
(6) and obtaining annual maintenance man-hour of each person, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Qeach person＝8×(365-d-e-2×52)-52·c
c is the man-hour of the comprehensive management of the per-year-per-year, d is the holiday days such as the per-year-per-year holiday and the event, e is the day of the legal holiday, QEach personThe total working hours are maintained for each person year;
(7) obtaining the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
R＝Q(λ·Qeach person)
Lambda is the total working hour utilization rate (value is calculated according to a measurement and calculation description matrix table, and the value is generally 0.9), and R is the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.

Claims (7)

1. A method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of an urban rail transit signal system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, dividing maintenance modes of urban rail transit equipment into daily maintenance, weekly check, monthly check, seasonal check, semi-annual check and annual check; counting the maintenance modes and the number of different devices and the unit maintenance duration in different maintenance modes, and performing step 2;
step 2, calculating the total time of a maintenance plan of certain equipment needing daily maintenance;
step 3, counting the total amount of the signal system equipment and the total maintenance plan working hours to obtain the total maintenance plan working hours of all the equipment;
step 4, acquiring annual fault handling man-hours according to the number of monthly faults and the average fault maintenance man-hours;
step 5, accounting annual maintenance total working hours according to standard operation efficiency;
step 6, calculating annual maintenance man-hour of each person;
and 7, calculating the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
2. The urban rail transit maintenance personnel rating method of claim 1, wherein: and (3) calculating the total maintenance plan man-hour of the daily maintenance equipment in the step 2, wherein the algorithm is realized as follows:
Q11＝A1×T11×m11
in the formula, the number of years of daily maintenance of one device is assumed to be A1The annual number of annual inspection is A2The number of years of monthly examinations is A3The annual number of season check is A4The number of year of half year examination is A5Annual inspection times are A6(ii) a The number of daily maintenance years of one device is 11, and the unit daily maintenance time of the device 11 is T11The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m11The total time of maintenance planning Q of the equipment 11 can be obtained11。
3. The urban rail transit maintenance personnel rating method of claim 1, wherein: and 3, calculating the total maintenance plan man-hour of all the equipment, wherein the algorithm is realized as follows:
Figure FDA0002353465320000011
wherein i and j respectively represent the j dimension value of the ith individual, and the daily maintenance annual number of the equipment is A1The annual number of annual inspection is A2The number of years of monthly examinations is A3The annual number of season check is A4The number of year of half year examination is A5Annual inspection times are A6；
The equipment needing daily maintenance is 11, 12, 13, … … and 1n, the equipment needing weekly inspection is 21, 22, 23, … … and 2n, the equipment needing monthly inspection is 31, 32, 33, … … and 3n, the equipment needing quarterly inspection is 41, 42, 43, … … and 4n, the equipment needing semiannual inspection is 51, 52, 53, … … and 5n, and the equipment needing annual inspection is 61, 62, 63, … … and 6n (the same equipment can appear in different repair courses);
the daily maintenance time per unit of the equipment 11 is T11The daily inspection time of 12 units of equipment is T12And the daily inspection time of 13 units of equipment is T13By analogy, the daily maintenance time of the equipment 1n is T1n. Similarly, the unit cycle inspection time of the equipment 2n is T2nThe 3n unit monthly test time of the equipment is T3nThe 4n unit season check time of the equipment is T4nThe half-year inspection time of 5n units of equipment is T5nThe annual inspection time of the equipment 6n unit is T6n；
The number of the equipments 11 for daily maintenance is m11(ii) a The number of the equipments 12 for daily maintenance is m12The number of the equipments 13 for daily maintenance is m13By analogy, the number of the equipment 1n for daily maintenance is m1n. Similarly, the number of the weekly inspection 2n is m2nThe number of monthly checks 3n is m3nThe number of season check 4n is m4nThe number of 5n in the half-year test is m5nThe number of annual inspection 6n is m6n。
4. The urban rail transit maintenance personnel rating method of claim 1, wherein: in the working hours of calculating annual fault processing in the step 4, the algorithm is realized as follows:
Qannual fault＝F×TF×12
Wherein F is the number of monthly failures and TFFor mean time between failure and repair, 12 months of the year, QAnnual faultThe year failure processing time is.
5. The urban rail transit maintenance personnel rating method of claim 1, wherein: and 5, calculating the annual maintenance total working hours, and realizing an algorithm as follows:
Qon duty a year＝V×52×8
QMajor guarantee of year＝8·a·b
QOthers＝52×8·b
Q＝QDetection of+QAnnual fault+QOn duty a year+QMajor guarantee of year+QOthers
In the formula, V is the number of days on duty required by urban rail transit workers each week, 52 refers to the number of weeks included in one year, and 8 refers to the working time of the workers in one day. a is the number of days of major guarantee per year (day of rest), and b is the number of people required for major accidents. QOn duty a yearIs the number of hours on duty per year, QMajor guarantee of yearFor a major guarantee of the number of man hours per year, QOthersThe maintenance man-hour is Q, and the annual maintenance total man-hour is Q.
6. The urban rail transit maintenance personnel rating method of claim 1, wherein: in the step 6, the annual maintenance man-hour of each person is calculated, and the algorithm is realized as follows:
Qeach person＝8×(365-d-e-2×52)-52·c
c is the man-hour of the comprehensive management of the per-year-per-year, d is the holiday days such as the per-year-per-year holiday and the event, e is the day of the legal holiday, QEach personThe total man-hour is maintained for each person.
7. The urban rail transit maintenance personnel rating method of claim 1, wherein: and 7, calculating the quota of the urban rail transit maintenance personnel, wherein the algorithm is realized as follows:
R＝Q/(λ·Qeach person)
Lambda is the total working hour utilization rate, and R is the quota of urban rail transit maintenance personnel.
CN201911425464.6A 2019-12-31 2019-12-31 Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system Active CN111310940B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911425464.6A CN111310940B (en) 2019-12-31 2019-12-31 Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911425464.6A CN111310940B (en) 2019-12-31 2019-12-31 Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111310940A true CN111310940A (en) 2020-06-19
CN111310940B CN111310940B (en) 2022-09-27

Family

ID=71161572

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911425464.6A Active CN111310940B (en) 2019-12-31 2019-12-31 Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111310940B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113392996A (en) * 2021-06-25 2021-09-14 中国人民解放军32181部队 Guarantee task model construction method based on minimum task unit

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104361439A (en) * 2014-11-04 2015-02-18 罗劲 Elevator maintenance time calculating method
JP5679537B1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2015-03-04 ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 Personnel allocation planning apparatus and method, and program
CN109272158A (en) * 2018-09-14 2019-01-25 安徽云轨信息科技有限公司 A kind of city railway vehicle frame overhaul system and method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5679537B1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2015-03-04 ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 Personnel allocation planning apparatus and method, and program
CN104361439A (en) * 2014-11-04 2015-02-18 罗劲 Elevator maintenance time calculating method
CN109272158A (en) * 2018-09-14 2019-01-25 安徽云轨信息科技有限公司 A kind of city railway vehicle frame overhaul system and method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113392996A (en) * 2021-06-25 2021-09-14 中国人民解放军32181部队 Guarantee task model construction method based on minimum task unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111310940B (en) 2022-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111259334B (en) Abnormal water consumption monitoring and early warning method for large users of industrial enterprises
CN104268678A (en) Preventative device maintenance method based on dynamic reliability
CN111191878A (en) Abnormal analysis based station area and electric energy meter state evaluation method and system
CN104123590A (en) 95598 customer service center operation monitoring system and method
CN111539604A (en) Enterprise rework and production recovery index measuring and monitoring method based on electric power data
CN104794554A (en) Electric power marketing inspection monitoring system based on software platform support
CN103048967A (en) Building resource consumption monitoring and management system
CN109948877B (en) Power consumption anomaly accurate analysis method based on anomaly event combination
CN111650901A (en) Intelligent unattended factory system for cement production line
CN107085746A (en) A kind of elevator maintenance enterprise management system based on cloud platform
CN103942726A (en) Intelligent inspection method for condition evaluation work of power grid equipment
CN111310940B (en) Method for rating equipment maintenance personnel of urban rail transit signal system
CN108805429A (en) " one continuous line " hardware and software platform fine-grained management method for taiwan area line loss
CN114371438B (en) Measuring equipment misalignment judgment method based on Internet of things
CN114818382A (en) Green assessment method for carbon emission of enterprise
CN104574211A (en) Power grid dispatching operating risk early warning method and system based on risk source
CN117348561A (en) Analysis management and control system for equipment shutdown
CN117078209A (en) Method, system and device for managing supervision project and computer storage medium
Frantasov et al. Information and measurement system for electric power losses accounting in railway transport
CN111915100A (en) High-precision freight prediction method and freight prediction system
CN107220921B (en) Verification method for data collected by energy consumption online monitoring system
CN114781855A (en) DEA model-based logistics transmission efficiency analysis method, device, equipment and medium
CN104281934A (en) Operation evaluation method applicable to full life cycle management of network distribution device
Ramadani et al. Performance Analysis of Road and Bridge Planning Consultants in Highway Work in Banjarbakula
CN114167342A (en) Evaluation method for running health state of relay protection device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant