CN111260242A - Evaluation system and method - Google Patents
Evaluation system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111260242A CN111260242A CN202010080715.8A CN202010080715A CN111260242A CN 111260242 A CN111260242 A CN 111260242A CN 202010080715 A CN202010080715 A CN 202010080715A CN 111260242 A CN111260242 A CN 111260242A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- credit
- information
- module
- index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 194
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 45
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000012946 outsourcing Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005034 decoration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003326 Quality management system Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an evaluation system and method. Wherein, this system includes: the system comprises an evaluation system design module and an evaluation system application module, wherein the evaluation system design module is used for making an evaluation scheme and an evaluation standard; and the evaluation system application module is connected with the evaluation system design module and is used for evaluating according to the evaluation scheme and the evaluation standard. The invention solves the technical problem of low management efficiency of the electric power safety production system caused by lack of establishment of a management system for electric power safety production in the prior art.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of electronic technology application, in particular to an evaluation system and method.
Background
With the transformation promotion of urban construction modes in China, the electric power safety production also faces new development and examination. The development of the electric power matching engineering enables the overall construction task of the electric power company to show a trend of being greatly increased in a short time, the safe production risk forms a more and more extensive situation, and the management and control difficulty of the operation safety, the construction quality and the safety risk is further increased. Meanwhile, the power production is a huge system project with numerous enterprises participating, most of power project construction and field operation tasks are participated in outsourcing enterprises, various power outsourcing construction enterprises are hundreds of families at all, and the management complexity is greatly improved. Based on the management perspective of an electric power company, the safety quality management system of the existing electric power construction enterprise has the following defects:
(1) the management system is to be perfected, the existing management system mainly aims at the related responsibility, flow and requirement of the internal security quality management of a company, the system aiming at the security quality management of an outsourcing enterprise is relatively imperfect, and an effective means is lacked for evaluating the security capability of the outsourcing construction enterprise.
(2) The management and control effect needs to be improved, the implementation of the existing management and control mainly bases on the construction qualification admission and construction site supervision of outsourcing enterprises, but from the perspective of promoting the active safety awareness of the outsourcing enterprises, the existing management and control effect is not ideal enough, related punishment measures cannot generate fundamental influence on the outsourcing enterprises, and the management and control pressure conduction is limited.
(3) The cooperative deficiency of safety and quality management is usually carried out on the safety management and the quality management of construction enterprises respectively, but the consistency of the safety management and the quality management on the attribute makes the current mode of separate management and control have certain limitation, and is not beneficial to the optimization of resource management and control effect.
Aiming at the problem that the management efficiency of the electric power safety production system is low due to lack of establishment of a management system for electric power safety production in the prior art, an effective solution is not provided at present.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention provides an evaluation system and method, which at least solve the technical problem of low management efficiency of an electric power safety production system caused by lack of establishment of a management system for electric power safety production in the prior art.
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation system including: the system comprises an evaluation system design module and an evaluation system application module, wherein the evaluation system design module is used for making an evaluation scheme and an evaluation standard; and the evaluation system application module is connected with the evaluation system design module and is used for evaluating according to the evaluation scheme and the evaluation standard.
Optionally, the evaluation system design module includes: the system comprises an evaluation scheme module, a credit index module, an evaluation standard module and a grade evaluation standard, wherein the evaluation scheme module is used for classifying the security quality credit information and configuring a corresponding evaluation algorithm for the classified information; the credit index module is used for configuring a credit capability index, a credit behavior index and a veto performance index in the security quality credit condition; the evaluation standard module is used for configuring corresponding evaluation standards according to the credit capability index, the credit behavior index and the vetoess index; and the grade rating standard is used for configuring the corresponding grade according to the grading standard.
Further, optionally, the security quality credit information includes: basic information and bad information, wherein the basic information comprises: the enterprise safety production administrative license qualification and the related change, continuation and cancellation information; the bad information includes: the method comprises the steps of finding out violation and violation behaviors and construction quality problem information of enterprises in the safety inspection and technical supervision and inspection processes of power companies, and finding out the behaviors of human bodies, power grids, equipment, information safety events, construction quality events and behaviors of violating safety quality violations or causing large social influences due to the responsibility of enterprise personnel.
Optionally, the evaluation algorithm is configured to perform normalization conversion on the positive and negative surface information, and then add the positive and negative surface information according to the weight to obtain a credit evaluation result.
Optionally, the evaluation system application module includes: the system comprises an organization support module, an application mechanism module and a control measure module, wherein the organization support module is used for configuring the functions of each department; the application mechanism module is used for configuring information collection, security quality credit rating and issuing mechanisms; and the management and control measure module is used for formulating section management and control measures according to enterprises of all levels.
According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided an evaluation method applied to the above evaluation system, including: acquiring a preset evaluation scheme and a preset evaluation standard; and evaluating according to a preset evaluation scheme and a preset evaluation standard.
Optionally, before obtaining the evaluation scheme and the evaluation criterion, the method further comprises: and (4) making an evaluation scheme and evaluation criteria.
Further, optionally, the formulating the evaluation scheme and the evaluation criterion comprises: classifying the security quality credit information, and configuring a corresponding evaluation algorithm for the classified information; configuring a credit capability index, a credit behavior index and a veto performance index in a security quality credit condition; configuring corresponding scoring standards according to the credit ability index, the credit behavior index and the overruling index; and configuring the corresponding grade according to the grading standard.
Optionally, the security quality credit information includes: basic information and bad information, wherein the basic information comprises: the enterprise safety production administrative license qualification and the related change, continuation and cancellation information; the bad information includes: the method comprises the steps of finding out violation and violation behaviors and construction quality problem information of enterprises in the safety inspection and technical supervision and inspection processes of power companies, and finding out the behaviors of human bodies, power grids, equipment, information safety events, construction quality events and behaviors of violating safety quality violations or causing large social influences due to the responsibility of enterprise personnel.
Optionally, the evaluation algorithm is configured to perform normalization conversion on the positive and negative surface information, and then add the positive and negative surface information according to the weight to obtain a credit evaluation result.
In the embodiment of the invention, an evaluation system design module and an evaluation system application module are used, wherein the evaluation system design module is used for making an evaluation scheme and an evaluation standard; the evaluation system application module is connected with the evaluation system design module and used for evaluating according to the evaluation scheme and the evaluation standard, so that the aim of improving the management efficiency of the electric power safety production system is fulfilled, the technical effect of wide application in the electric power industry is achieved, and the technical problem of low management efficiency of the electric power safety production system caused by lack of formulation of a management system for electric power safety production in the prior art is solved.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention without limiting the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a construction enterprise security quality credit evaluation index tree in an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of an organization structure in an assessment system according to an embodiment of the invention;
fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation method according to an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present invention and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Example 1
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation system, and fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 1, including: the system comprises an evaluation system design module 12 and an evaluation system application module 14, wherein the evaluation system design module 12 is used for making an evaluation scheme and an evaluation standard; and the evaluation system application module 14 is connected with the evaluation system design module 12 and is used for evaluating according to the evaluation scheme and the evaluation standard.
In the embodiment of the invention, an evaluation system design module and an evaluation system application module are used, wherein the evaluation system design module is used for making an evaluation scheme and an evaluation standard; the evaluation system application module is connected with the evaluation system design module and used for evaluating according to the evaluation scheme and the evaluation standard, so that the aim of improving the management efficiency of the electric power safety production system is fulfilled, the technical effect of wide application in the electric power industry is achieved, and the technical problem of low management efficiency of the electric power safety production system caused by lack of formulation of a management system for electric power safety production in the prior art is solved.
Optionally, the evaluation system design module 12 includes: the system comprises an evaluation scheme module, a credit index module, an evaluation standard module and a grade evaluation standard, wherein the evaluation scheme module is used for classifying the security quality credit information and configuring a corresponding evaluation algorithm for the classified information; the credit index module is used for configuring a credit capability index, a credit behavior index and a veto performance index in the security quality credit condition; the evaluation standard module is used for configuring corresponding evaluation standards according to the credit capability index, the credit behavior index and the vetoess index; and the grade rating standard is used for configuring the corresponding grade according to the grading standard.
Further, optionally, the security quality credit information includes: basic information and bad information, wherein the basic information comprises: the enterprise safety production administrative license qualification and the related change, continuation and cancellation information; the bad information includes: the method comprises the steps of finding out violation and violation behaviors and construction quality problem information of enterprises in the safety inspection and technical supervision and inspection processes of power companies, and finding out the behaviors of human bodies, power grids, equipment, information safety events, construction quality events and behaviors of violating safety quality violations or causing large social influences due to the responsibility of enterprise personnel.
Optionally, the evaluation algorithm is configured to perform normalization conversion on the positive and negative surface information, and then add the positive and negative surface information according to the weight to obtain a credit evaluation result.
Optionally, the evaluation system application module 14 includes: the system comprises an organization support module, an application mechanism module and a control measure module, wherein the organization support module is used for configuring the functions of each department; the application mechanism module is used for configuring information collection, security quality credit rating and issuing mechanisms; and the management and control measure module is used for formulating section management and control measures according to enterprises of all levels.
In summary, fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 2, the evaluation system provided in the embodiment of the present application specifically includes:
in order to strengthen the management of an electric power company in the aspect of safety quality of an electric power construction enterprise, implement the idea and the requirement of the construction of a national credit system and improve the intrinsic safety management level of the electric power industry, the evaluation system provided by the embodiment of the application provides a novel electric power construction enterprise safety quality credit evaluation system.
In consideration of the internal attributes of the evaluation model dynamism and the internal requirements of the practicability, the evaluation system provided by the embodiment of the application constructs the core content and the application mode of the security quality credit system of the power construction enterprise from the design and application aspects of the security quality credit evaluation system (see fig. 2), wherein the system design comprises four parts including an evaluation scheme, a credit index, an evaluation standard and a grade evaluation standard; the system application comprises three parts of organization guarantee, an application mechanism and management and control measures.
Wherein, the evaluation system design comprises:
(1) evaluation protocol
① classification of information
Safety quality credit information of power construction enterprises can be divided into two categories: 1) the basic information comprises the administrative license and qualification of enterprise safety production, and related information such as change, continuation, logout and the like. 2) Bad information comprises information of violations, violations and construction quality problems of enterprises found in the process of security inspection and technical supervision and inspection of power companies, information of personal, power grids, equipment, information security events, construction quality events and the like caused by the responsibility of enterprise personnel, and other behaviors of violating the violations of security quality or causing great social influence.
② evaluation algorithm
The credit evaluation of the security quality adopts an integral mechanism of positive and negative surface information, namely, the positive and negative surface information is subjected to normalization conversion and then is accumulated according to weight to obtain a credit evaluation result. Specifically, the credit evaluation formula is:
security quality credit evaluation score ═ Σ (ai × Xi)
Wherein: ai is evaluation weight of positive and negative plane information
Xi is an evaluation score of positive and negative information
The positive and negative information is normalized, the evaluation score of each item of information is calculated by 100 points of full score, and the interval of credit evaluation score after weighted accumulation is 0-100 points.
(2) Index system
In order to more comprehensively reflect the security quality credit condition of the power construction enterprise, the system is constructed by an index system from two aspects of credit capability and credit behavior, and a veto index is separately set. Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a construction enterprise security quality credit evaluation index tree in an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
(3) Evaluation criteria
On the basis of the indexes, a specific scoring standard is given to the credit evaluation indexes of the safety quality through normalization treatment, and the detailed scoring standard is shown in a table 1:
TABLE 1 evaluation standard of security quality credit evaluation index of power construction enterprise
(4) Rating criterion
The system divides the security quality credit level of the power construction enterprise into four levels according to the credit score:
first order is 90 (inclusive) to 100 minutes;
the second grade is 70 (inclusive) to 90 minutes;
the third stage is 60 (inclusive) to 70 minutes;
the fourth stage is 60 (none) or less.
According to the principle of hierarchical management, the construction enterprise safety quality credit grade is evaluated as an excellent state enterprise at the first level, as a normal state enterprise at the second level, as an attention state enterprise at the third level and as a key attention state enterprise at the fourth level.
The application of the evaluation system comprises the following steps:
(1) tissue security
To ensure the successful development of the security quality credit evaluation work, the electric power company needs to establish an organizational security system for the security quality credit evaluation (see fig. 4, fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of an organizational structure in an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention), and to specify respective responsibilities. Wherein, the safety production leader is responsible for auditing relevant regulations and systems for evaluating the safety quality credit and the evaluation result of the safety quality credit. The security department is responsible for the return management of the security quality credit evaluation, the collection of the credit information of the power construction enterprise, the system input and the like. The operation inspection part is responsible for work such as construction quality information collection and supervision of safety quality credit evaluation result application. And the material department is responsible for taking 'negotiation' and 'forbidden' measures for the power construction enterprises according to the safety quality credit evaluation results and feeding back the company safety quality credit evaluation leaders. The electric academy is responsible for centralizing and organizing collection and input of basic information and auditing and analyzing of safety quality information. The business establishment package company is responsible for collecting basic information of the expansion project construction and inputting the information into the system, and applying a safety quality credit evaluation result in the expansion project range.
(2) Application mechanism
① explicit information aggregation mechanism
The collection of the credit information is the basis for developing credit evaluation, so a normalized information collection mechanism needs to be established to ensure that the credit information is timely, effectively and accurately acquired, thereby forming a scientific management and control basis.
② Security quality Credit rating and issuing mechanism
According to the principle of 'monthly statistics and season release', the safety quality information is counted monthly, the safety quality credit level is assessed quarterly, and after being audited by a company safety quality information assessment leader group, assessment reports are released.
(3) Management and control measure
Different management and control measures are made for enterprises in different states:
① the enterprise in the excellent state sets the excellent enterprise bonus item in the process of bid evaluation, properly improves the probability level of the enterprise for taking over projects, and forms a forward direction guiding and exciting mechanism for each power construction enterprise to change to the excellent enterprise.
② for enterprises in normal state, the safety production manager of the enterprise needs to be in the field and the two-stage inspection of the enterprise needs to be fully covered.
③, enterprises in 'concerned' state take 'forbidden' measures for one year, and the enterprises cannot be involved in various projects of company production, operation, organization and management, and cannot participate in construction in any sub-package form.
④ enterprises in the state of 'key attention' adopt 'forbidden' measures for three years, and have no need of taking part in various projects of company production, operation, organization and management, and have no need of participating in construction in any sub-package form.
The evaluation system provided by the embodiment of the application aims at the problems existing in the safety quality management of the power construction enterprise, and provides a safety quality credit evaluation system of the power construction enterprise based on the management view angle of the power company, and has the following beneficial effects:
(1) the credit evaluation system covers two indexes of credit capability and credit behavior, and index integration is taken as an evaluation core scheme, so that the conditions that the capability and the behavior are combined, the safety and the quality are combined, the quantity and the fairness are combined, and the optimization and the evaluation are combined in the evaluation process of an enterprise are ensured.
(2) The credit evaluation system is constructed through the processes of design, verification, deepening and application, so that the credit evaluation system can objectively, comprehensively and fairly reflect the overall conditions of outsourcing enterprises including construction enterprises, equipment manufacturers, design units and supervision units, and has a supporting function on the management and control of the safety quality of companies.
(3) The credit evaluation system forms a quantifiable credit evaluation scheme by constructing a credit evaluation model based on a comprehensive and dynamic index system, further forms a hierarchical management basis by a credit rating standard, lays a foundation for implementation of subsequent management measures, and has very obvious practical significance in wide application in the power industry.
Example 2
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation method embodiment, it being noted that the steps illustrated in the flowchart of the figure may be performed in a computer system such as a set of computer-executable instructions, and that while a logical order is illustrated in the flowchart, in some cases the steps illustrated or described may be performed in an order different than here.
Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 5, applied to the evaluation system in embodiment 1 above, the method including the steps of:
step S502, acquiring a preset evaluation scheme and a preset evaluation standard;
and step S504, evaluating according to a preset evaluation scheme and a preset evaluation standard.
Optionally, before the evaluation scheme and the evaluation criterion are obtained in step S502, the evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application further includes: and (4) making an evaluation scheme and evaluation criteria.
Further, optionally, the formulating the evaluation scheme and the evaluation criterion comprises: classifying the security quality credit information, and configuring a corresponding evaluation algorithm for the classified information; configuring a credit capability index, a credit behavior index and a veto performance index in a security quality credit condition; configuring corresponding scoring standards according to the credit ability index, the credit behavior index and the overruling index; and configuring the corresponding grade according to the grading standard.
Optionally, the security quality credit information includes: basic information and bad information, wherein the basic information comprises: the enterprise safety production administrative license qualification and the related change, continuation and cancellation information; the bad information includes: the method comprises the steps of finding out violation and violation behaviors and construction quality problem information of enterprises in the safety inspection and technical supervision and inspection processes of power companies, and finding out the behaviors of human bodies, power grids, equipment, information safety events, construction quality events and behaviors of violating safety quality violations or causing large social influences due to the responsibility of enterprise personnel.
Optionally, the evaluation algorithm is configured to perform normalization conversion on the positive and negative surface information, and then add the positive and negative surface information according to the weight to obtain a credit evaluation result.
The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.
In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology can be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units may be a logical division, and in actual implementation, there may be another division, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, units or modules, and may be in an electrical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic or optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and decorations can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these modifications and decorations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An evaluation system, comprising: an evaluation system design module and an evaluation system application module, wherein,
the evaluation system design module is used for making an evaluation scheme and an evaluation standard;
and the evaluation system application module is connected with the evaluation system design module and is used for evaluating according to the evaluation scheme and the evaluation standard.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the evaluation system design module comprises: an evaluation scheme module, a credit indicator module, an evaluation criteria module, and a rating criterion, wherein,
the evaluation scheme module is used for classifying the security quality credit information and configuring a corresponding evaluation algorithm for the classified information;
the credit index module is used for configuring a credit capability index, a credit behavior index and a veto performance index in the security quality credit condition;
the evaluation standard module is used for configuring corresponding scoring standards according to the credit capability index, the credit behavior index and the overruling index;
and the grade evaluation standard is used for configuring a corresponding grade according to the grading standard.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the security quality credit information comprises: basic information and bad information, wherein,
the basic information includes: the enterprise safety production administrative license qualification and the related change, continuation and cancellation information;
the bad information includes: the method comprises the steps of finding out violation and violation behaviors and construction quality problem information of enterprises in the safety inspection and technical supervision and inspection processes of power companies, and finding out the behaviors of human bodies, power grids, equipment, information safety events, construction quality events and behaviors of violating safety quality violations or causing large social influences due to the responsibility of enterprise personnel.
4. The system of claim 2, wherein the evaluation algorithm is configured to perform normalization conversion on the positive and negative information, and then add the positive and negative information according to weights to obtain a credit evaluation result.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the evaluation system application module comprises: an organization and guarantee module, an application mechanism module and a control measure module, wherein,
the organization support module is used for configuring the functions of all departments;
the application mechanism module is used for configuring information collection, security quality credit rating and issuing mechanisms;
and the management and control measure module is used for formulating segmented management and control measures according to enterprises of various levels.
6. An evaluation method applied to the evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 5, comprising:
acquiring a preset evaluation scheme and a preset evaluation standard;
and evaluating according to the preset evaluation scheme and the preset evaluation standard.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein prior to said obtaining an evaluation scenario and evaluation criteria, the method further comprises:
and (4) making an evaluation scheme and evaluation criteria.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the formulating an evaluation scheme and evaluation criteria comprises:
classifying the security quality credit information, and configuring a corresponding evaluation algorithm for the classified information;
configuring a credit capability index, a credit behavior index and a veto performance index in a security quality credit condition;
configuring corresponding scoring standards according to the credit capability index, the credit behavior index and the overruling index;
and configuring corresponding grades according to the grading standard.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the security quality credit information comprises: basic information and bad information, wherein,
the basic information includes: the enterprise safety production administrative license qualification and the related change, continuation and cancellation information;
the bad information includes: the method comprises the steps of finding out violation and violation behaviors and construction quality problem information of enterprises in the safety inspection and technical supervision and inspection processes of power companies, and finding out the behaviors of human bodies, power grids, equipment, information safety events, construction quality events and behaviors of violating safety quality violations or causing large social influences due to the responsibility of enterprise personnel.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the evaluation algorithm is configured to perform normalization conversion on the positive and negative information, and then add the positive and negative information according to weights to obtain a credit evaluation result.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010080715.8A CN111260242A (en) | 2020-02-05 | 2020-02-05 | Evaluation system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010080715.8A CN111260242A (en) | 2020-02-05 | 2020-02-05 | Evaluation system and method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111260242A true CN111260242A (en) | 2020-06-09 |
Family
ID=70952688
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010080715.8A Pending CN111260242A (en) | 2020-02-05 | 2020-02-05 | Evaluation system and method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111260242A (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006243793A (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2006-09-14 | Toshiba Corp | System, method and program for evaluation of power quality |
| JP2012138323A (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2012-07-19 | Kobelco Kaken:Kk | Device for safety evaluation test |
| CN108090681A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-05-29 | 广州供电局有限公司 | Electricity provider evaluation optimization method, system, storage medium and computer equipment |
| CN109559054A (en) * | 2018-12-04 | 2019-04-02 | 国网山东省电力公司无棣县供电公司 | A kind of Phase of Electric Power Projects information processing system |
-
2020
- 2020-02-05 CN CN202010080715.8A patent/CN111260242A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006243793A (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2006-09-14 | Toshiba Corp | System, method and program for evaluation of power quality |
| JP2012138323A (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2012-07-19 | Kobelco Kaken:Kk | Device for safety evaluation test |
| CN108090681A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-05-29 | 广州供电局有限公司 | Electricity provider evaluation optimization method, system, storage medium and computer equipment |
| CN109559054A (en) * | 2018-12-04 | 2019-04-02 | 国网山东省电力公司无棣县供电公司 | A kind of Phase of Electric Power Projects information processing system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 李洪斌等: "电力施工企业安全质量信用评价体系构建研究", 《经营与管理》 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Rowe et al. | Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis | |
| CN112001586B (en) | Enterprise networking big data audit risk control architecture based on block chain consensus mechanism | |
| CN108596443A (en) | A kind of Electricity customers method for evaluating credit rating based on multi-dimensional data | |
| CN110503136A (en) | Platform area line loss exception analysis method, computer readable storage medium and terminal device | |
| CN103825755A (en) | Power secondary system modeling method and system | |
| CN101364284A (en) | Production management system for electrical power system | |
| CN115048990A (en) | Carbon emission metering method and device based on intelligent park operation management scene | |
| CN110659976A (en) | Enterprise technology service credit investigation system based on block chain and management method thereof | |
| CN105574666A (en) | Method and device for evaluating credit level of enterprise based on key data modeling | |
| CN113434575A (en) | Data attribution processing method and device based on data warehouse and storage medium | |
| CN111178676A (en) | Power distribution network project investment assessment method and system | |
| CN113436024A (en) | ESG (electronic service guide) credible index comprehensive service platform based on block chain | |
| CN111127186A (en) | Application method of customer credit rating evaluation system based on big data technology | |
| CN111260242A (en) | Evaluation system and method | |
| CN115719206A (en) | Control system and method based on electric power engineering sub-packet access and secondary matching | |
| CN108733851A (en) | A kind of construction machinery equipment secure data analysis and evaluation system | |
| CN115330404A (en) | System and method for electric power marketing inspection | |
| Ke et al. | Research and application of enterprise big data governance | |
| CN114218216A (en) | Resource management method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Li et al. | Smartcmp: A cloud cost optimization governance practice of smart cloud management platform | |
| CN110189045A (en) | A method of it is supervised for judicial early warning | |
| CN117611107B (en) | Classification and classification system and application system management system | |
| Ma | Design and Implementation of Enterprise Accounting Supervision Platform Based on Big Data | |
| Zhao et al. | The Mechanism of Blockchain Technology Influencing Management Accounting | |
| Zhao et al. | Research on the construction of data pool and the management model of data pool integrating block chain concept for ubiquitous electric power Internet of Things |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200609 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |