CN110858353B

CN110858353B - Method and system for obtaining case judge result

Info

Publication number: CN110858353B
Application number: CN201810941506.0A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 张雅婷; 周鑫; 李泉志; 孙常龙; 刘晓钟; 司罗
Original assignee: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
Current assignee: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
Priority date: 2018-08-17
Filing date: 2018-08-17
Publication date: 2023-05-05
Anticipated expiration: 2038-08-17
Also published as: CN110858353A

Abstract

The invention discloses a method and a system for acquiring a case judge result. Wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate. The invention solves the technical problem of low accuracy of the judge result of legal cases in the prior art.

Description

Method and system for obtaining case judge result

Technical Field

The invention relates to the legal field, in particular to a method and a system for acquiring a case judge result.

Background

With the development of the Internet, a plurality of devices realize intellectualization, and bring a plurality of convenience to the life and work of people. The intelligent judicial system or intelligent systems such as Internet court converts information in paper or picture form into text messages through OCR (Optical Character Recognition) technology, and performs information structuring processing on a plurality of extracted text messages, so that users (such as judges) can complete transaction disputes, lawsuits of intellectual property keys and the like through the Internet, work tasks of legal workers are reduced, and work efficiency of the legal workers is improved.

However, the existing intelligent judicial system or intelligent systems such as Internet court only judges cases according to the information submitted before court trial, and new information possibly generated in the court trial process is ignored, so that the accuracy of the obtained judging result is low.

Aiming at the problem of low accuracy of the judge result of legal cases in the prior art, no effective solution is proposed at present.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a system for acquiring a case referee result, which are used for at least solving the technical problem of low accuracy of the referee result of legal cases in the prior art.

According to an aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method for acquiring a case referee result, including: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

According to another aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: displaying the case information of the case to be refereed submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; and displaying that the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

According to another aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed, which is submitted before court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer dialect and evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an initial judge result; and receiving a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result; and adjusting an initial referee result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain the referee result, wherein the legal logic diagram at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

According to another aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result; analyzing the case information based on the legal logic atlas and combining the anti-dialect result to obtain a referee result, wherein the referee result is used for representing the case information and the legal fact entity obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

According to another aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a referee result system for acquiring a case, including: a processor; and a memory, coupled to the processor, for providing instructions to the processor for processing the steps of: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

In the embodiment of the invention, the case information of the case to be refereed, which is submitted before the court trial, and the court trial record in the court trial process are acquired, and based on the legal logic atlas, the case information and the court trial record are analyzed together, so that the referee result is determined, and compared with the mode of neglecting the court trial record and determining the referee result by only using the case information, the proposal in the application maps the information possibly changed or modified in the court trial process into the legal logic atlas, so that the referee result has higher accuracy.

Therefore, the technical problem of low accuracy of the judge result of the legal case in the prior art is solved by the embodiment of the application.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention and do not constitute a limitation on the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of the hardware architecture of a computer terminal (or mobile device) for implementing a method of acquiring case referee results;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method of obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a legal logic diagram according to example 1 of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of an alternative legal logic diagram according to example 1 of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an interactive interface presented to a judge by an algorithm according to embodiment 1 of the present application;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a method of obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application;

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a method of obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 2 of the present application;

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a method of obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 3 of the present application;

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a method of obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 4 of the present application;

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 5 of the present application;

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 6 of the present application;

FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 7 of the present application;

FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 8 of the present application; and

fig. 14 is a block diagram of a computer terminal according to embodiment 9 of the present invention.

Detailed Description

In order that those skilled in the art will better understand the present invention, a technical solution in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in which it is apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any inventive effort, shall fall within the scope of the present invention.

It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and the claims of the present invention and the above figures are used for distinguishing between similar objects and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used may be interchanged where appropriate such that the embodiments of the invention described herein may be implemented in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

First, partial terms or terminology appearing in describing embodiments of the present application are applicable to the following explanation:

the logic key points are as follows: i.e. a certain node on the legal logic map, i.e. typically a discriminant entity.

The focus of the dispute: the core focus of the anti-debate of the original and the interviewee parties. In this application, the dispute focus may be mapped to a node on a logical graph. In terms of expression, in court trial records, the original and interviewed parties are typically discussed in terms of one or more sets of conversations around a point of dispute.

Example 1

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided an embodiment of a method of obtaining case referee results, it being noted that the steps shown in the flowchart of the figures may be performed in a computer system, such as a set of computer-executable instructions, and, although a logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in an order other than that shown.

The method embodiment provided in the first embodiment of the present application may be executed in a mobile terminal, a computer terminal or a similar computing device. Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of a hardware configuration of a computer terminal (or mobile device) for implementing a method of acquiring case referee results. As shown in fig. 1, the computer terminal 10 (or mobile device 10) may include one or more processors 102 (shown as 102a, 102b, … …,102 n) which may include, but are not limited to, a microprocessor MCU or a processing device such as a programmable logic device FPGA, a memory 104 for storing data, and a transmission module 106 for communication functions. In addition, the method may further include: a display, an input/output interface (I/O interface), a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port (which may be included as one of the ports of the I/O interface), a network interface, a power supply, and/or a camera. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the configuration shown in fig. 1 is merely illustrative and is not intended to limit the configuration of the electronic device described above. For example, the computer terminal 10 may also include more or fewer components than shown in FIG. 1, or have a different configuration than shown in FIG. 1.

It should be noted that the one or more processors 102 and/or other data processing circuits described above may be referred to generally herein as "data processing circuits. The data processing circuit may be embodied in whole or in part in software, hardware, firmware, or any other combination. Furthermore, the data processing circuitry may be a single stand-alone processing module, or incorporated, in whole or in part, into any of the other elements in the computer terminal 10 (or mobile device). As referred to in the embodiments of the present application, the data processing circuit acts as a processor control (e.g., selection of the path of the variable resistor termination to interface).

The memory 104 may be used to store software programs and modules of application software, such as program instructions/data storage devices corresponding to the method for obtaining case referee results in the embodiment of the present invention, and the processor 102 executes the software programs and modules stored in the memory 104, thereby executing various functional applications and data processing, that is, implementing the above-mentioned vulnerability detection method of application programs. Memory 104 may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic storage devices, flash memory, or other non-volatile solid-state memory. In some examples, the memory 104 may further include memory located remotely from the processor 102, which may be connected to the computer terminal 10 via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

The transmission means 106 is arranged to receive or transmit data via a network. The specific examples of the network described above may include a wireless network provided by a communication provider of the computer terminal 10. In one example, the transmission device 106 includes a network adapter (Network Interface Controller, NIC) that can connect to other network devices through a base station to communicate with the internet. In one example, the transmission device 106 may be a Radio Frequency (RF) module for communicating with the internet wirelessly.

The display may be, for example, a touch screen type Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) that may enable a user to interact with a user interface of the computer terminal 10 (or mobile device).

It should be noted here that, in some alternative embodiments, the computer device (or mobile device) shown in fig. 1 described above may include hardware elements (including circuitry), software elements (including computer code stored on a computer-readable medium), or a combination of both hardware and software elements. It should be noted that fig. 1 is only one example of a specific example, and is intended to illustrate the types of components that may be present in the computer device (or mobile device) described above.

In the above-described operating environment, the present application provides a method for obtaining case referee results as shown in fig. 2. Fig. 2 is a flowchart of a method of acquiring case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application.

Step S21, acquiring case information of the to-be-refereed cases submitted before the court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

Specifically, the case information of the case to be refereed refers to information which is inherent to legal cases and has been submitted before court trial. In the executing process, the case information of the case to be judged can be obtained by the information extraction or data mining module, and the information extraction or information mining module can extract the case information of the legal case from the legal document corresponding to the legal case and can mine the case information from other paths. For example: the prosecution, the answer, and the debate can be legal documents, and the evidence information can be network data, for example, for a claim dispute of a counterfeit and inferior commodity, the information such as commodity price, actual transaction price, refund, seller reputation, buying point reputation, and the like can be extracted from the evidence transaction log as evidence.

The court trial records refer to the text records of all trial interaction real conditions in the court trial process. Wherein the complaint information may include prosecution information of the original notice to the notice in the court trial process, and the prosecution information may include prosecution of the original notice/the counsel or the representative lawyer in the court trial process; the source of the new evidence information is still not limited, and the new evidence information can be a new witness's witness in the court trial process, and can be evidence information which is presented in the court trial process by original notices or notices and is different from evidence information submitted before the court trial. In addition, the court trial record can also comprise information such as comments and the like stated by the judge in the court trial process.

In the step S21, the process of acquiring the case information may be performed before the court trial, and the process of acquiring the record may be performed during the court trial or after the court trial is completed.

Step S23, analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

Optionally, fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a legal logic diagram according to embodiment 1 of the present application, where in fig. 3, "number of litigation in the national referee net", "number of litigation in the internet court" and "whether to report abuses" are elements, "whether to report self-certifying abuses", "whether to be warned of self-certifying abuses", "whether to be more than 3 times in the national referee net", "whether to be more than 3 times in the internet court" are distinguishing points, and "or" are logic gates ".

It should be noted that, the legal logic diagram mainly includes:

(1) An entity. In this application, the entities of the legal logic atlas mainly include objective facts elements and legal elements. As shown in fig. 3, the objective fact element is "number of litigation of original national referee net" and "number of litigation of original internet court", and the legal element is "whether to notice abused or not".

(2) Relationship. In this application, relationships of legal logic graphs may refer to attribute relationships, logical relationships. For example, in FIG. 3, the relationship between various legal elements is an OR relationship.

(3) And (5) triad. The application mainly comprises the following three types: an "objective fact element-attribute relationship-objective fact element" (e.g., "original notice-attribute relationship-identification number"), "objective fact element-logical relationship-legal element" (e.g., "commodity description-logical relationship-whether a medical effect is advertised"), "legal element-logical relationship-legal element" (e.g., "whether an original price is fictitious-logical relationship-whether a discount price is wrong").

Based on the legal logic atlas, the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed, namely the case information and the court trial record are used as input information of the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas is traversed, so that a final judge result is obtained.

In an alternative embodiment, after the trial record and the case information are acquired, the case information and the trial record are mapped into legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas outputs a final judge result according to the case information and the trial record.

In another alternative embodiment, after the case information is acquired, the case information may be input into a legal logic atlas, and a referee result obtained according to the case information may be acquired. After the court trial record is obtained, the court trial record can be input into the legal logic atlas, the judge result obtained according to the court trial record is obtained, and when the judge result obtained according to the case information is different from the judge result obtained according to the court trial record, the judge result obtained according to the case information is adjusted by using the judge result obtained according to the court trial record, so that the final judge result is obtained.

It should be noted that, before the court trial, the original notice or the notice needs to submit the corresponding case information to the court, and the judge may pre-judge the case according to the case information submitted before the court trial, but in the court trial process, the original notice or the notice may provide new evidence, and the answer information and the complaint information may be different from the answer book and the prosecution submitted before the court trial, so if the judge result is obtained by analyzing the case information submitted before the court trial based on the legal logic map, the court trial record generated in the court trial process may be ignored, thereby resulting in inaccurate judge result.

According to the method and the device for determining the judging result, the case information of the case to be judged, which is submitted before the court trial, and the court trial record in the court trial process are obtained, and based on the legal logic map, analysis is carried out according to the case information and the court trial record together, so that the judging result is determined.

As an alternative embodiment, the analysis processing is performed on the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic map to obtain the judge result, including: traversing the case information and the court trial record in a legal logic map, and taking the obtained legal fact entity as a judge result; in the traversing process, mapping case information and court trial records onto legal logic maps respectively, and acquiring information for generating a judge result if the case information and the court trial records are mapped onto corresponding nodes successfully.

Specifically, the legal facts refer to objective conditions that legal relationships can be generated, changed and eliminated. The law enforcement entity refers to a node in the law logic map that represents law enforcement.

In the above scheme, the case information and the court trial record are traversed in the legal logic atlas to obtain the judge result, the traversal can be used for representing searching or searching in the legal logic atlas, in the traversing process, the case information and the court trial record need to be mapped to the corresponding node of the legal logic atlas, and in the case information or the court trial record mapped to the node on the legal logic atlas, the mapped node can be assigned according to the case information and the court trial record.

In an alternative embodiment, the case information may include prosecution, answer, evidence information, and so on, and in order to determine the mapped node of the case information in the legal logic map, keywords in the case information may be obtained through information extraction, for example: original notice information in the prosecution book, notice information in the answer book and the like, and searching nodes corresponding to the keywords in the legal logic map, namely, the nodes mapped on the legal logic map by the case information.

The court trial records comprise complaint information, answer information, new evidence information and the like, and in the process of traversing the law logic atlas, the court trial records can be converted into corresponding vectors by carrying out semantic analysis on the court trial records, and the nodes mapped on the law logic atlas are determined by the vectors corresponding to each statement in the court trial records.

After determining the nodes mapped by the case information and the court trial records in the legal logic atlas, the mapped nodes can be assigned according to the case information or the court trial records, and the assignment is the information of the user generated judge result.

Still taking fig. 3 as an example, for the node "number of litigation of original notice in the chinese referee document net", the number of litigation of original notice in the chinese referee document net may be extracted from the case information and mapped to the node, so that the node "number of litigation of original notice in the chinese referee document net" in the legal logic map obtains the information for generating the referee result.

As an optional embodiment, traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas, and taking the obtained legal fact entity as a judge result, including: extracting at least one logic gist from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record, wherein the logic gist corresponds to a node in the legal logic atlas; obtaining at least one point of dispute based on the at least one logical point; mapping from the legal logic map to obtain a first judgment fact based on each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and combining the second judgment facts obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment facts to generate legal fact entities.

Specifically, at least one logic gist is extracted from the court trial records, and the logic gist corresponding to the court trial records can be found from legal logic atlas. In an alternative embodiment, each node in the legal logic graph has corresponding description information for describing information such as the name, attribute, etc. of the node. The keyword of each sentence in the court trial record obtained by carrying out semantic analysis on the court trial record can be matched with the description information of the node according to the keyword, so that the corresponding relation between the court trial record and the node in the legal logic map is obtained.

The above-mentioned dispute focus refers to a node having an important influence meaning on the referee result, and after determining a node mapped in the legal logic atlas of the court trial record, the dispute focus needs to be determined based on the logic gist. The manner of determining the dispute focus may be to take preset nodes in the legal logic atlas from the nodes serving as the dispute focus or to extract the dispute focus from the logic gist according to preset rules.

The context information corresponding to the dispute focus refers to information associated with the dispute focus in the court trial record. In the above scheme, the first judgment fact is obtained by mapping the court trial record in the legal logic map and assigning the dispute focus in the legal logic map, the second judgment fact is obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map and assigning the dispute focus in the legal logic map, and the legal fact entity for representing the judgment result is obtained by traversing the legal logic map according to the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact.

As an alternative embodiment, extracting at least one logical point from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record includes: identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record; based on the identified keywords, matching with nodes in the legal logic graph, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following: name, attribute, and semantic information; and taking the node with the similarity exceeding the threshold value in the matching result as a logic gist.

According to the scheme, the nodes on the logic map are mapped for the first time in the court trial record, the logic gist corresponding to each sentence is identified, and the nodes in the legal logic map have corresponding description information, for example: name, attribute, semantic information, etc., node attributes may be used to indicate whether the node is a legal facts entity or an objective facts entity, and semantic information is used to describe the node further. The primary mapping mainly depends on that semantic information of nodes on the map comprises names of the nodes, attribute remarks of the nodes and semantic information of each sentence

In an alternative embodiment, TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequency, a common weighting technique for information retrieval data mining) may be used to obtain keywords from the court trial records, match the keywords of the court trial records with nodes in the legal logic atlas, determine the similarity between each keyword and each node, and use the node with similarity exceeding a threshold as a logic gist. If the similarity between a keyword and a plurality of nodes exceeds a threshold, the node with the highest similarity with the keyword can be determined as a logic key point.

As an alternative embodiment, deriving at least one dispute focus based on at least one logical point comprises: acquiring sentences containing at least one logic gist, and marking the logic gist, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations; clustering the marked at least one logical point to generate at least one dispute focus.

After the logical gist is extracted from the legal logic atlas, each sentence in the court trial record is marked with a logical gist, and the sentences are marked with the marks as the sentences of the marked logical gist. In an alternative embodiment, each sentence in the court trial record is marked with at least one identifier, the identifier is used for representing a logic gist in the legal logic atlas, and the sentence with the uniform identifier is taken as the sentence of the logic gist corresponding to the identifier. The purpose of the above-described scheme is to identify and extract one or more sets of conversations surrounding the dispute focus, facilitating assignment calculation for each dispute focus.

When marking the logic points, in an alternative embodiment, only part of the logic points in all the logic points can be marked, and in the case that only part of the logic points are marked, only part of the marked logic points are clustered in the subsequent clustering process, and the processing mode can enable the system to have higher processing efficiency in the process of acquiring the disputed focus; in another alternative embodiment, all the logic points may be marked or not marked, and the embodiment of marking all the logic points or not marking all the logic points realizes that all the logic points are clustered in the subsequent clustering process, and the obtained result accuracy of the disputed focus is relatively higher compared with the scheme of marking part of the logic points.

Since the logical gist may be a child node on the logical atlas and the dispute focus is generally considered as a core gist, the marked logical gist may be clustered, and a preferred clustering manner is hierarchical clustering (Hierarchical Agglomerate Clustering), so that the nodes important in the logical atlas are obtained, and the dispute focus obtained by clustering may be used as the dispute focus. The hierarchical clustering process mainly depends on the dependency relationship among all logic points in the logic map. Because the links of each node in the legal logic graph are directional, the direction of hierarchical clustering is the same as the direction in the legal logic graph.

As an alternative embodiment, after clustering the annotated at least one logical gist to generate at least one dispute focus, the method further comprises: classifying all the dispute foci to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute foci, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute foci; and taking sentences corresponding to each group of disputed focuses as context information.

In the above scheme, after hierarchical clustering is performed on the logic points, a threshold may be defined manually or automatically, and a plurality of "classes" currently divided by the threshold are used as a plurality of corresponding dispute focuses, and sentences contained in each "class" are used as context materials for determining assignment of the dispute focuses.

As an alternative embodiment, mapping the first decision facts from the legal logic atlas based on each dispute focus and context information corresponding to each dispute focus includes: acquiring statement content of each dispute focus from the context information of the corresponding dispute focus; mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into a legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts; and performing global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain first judgment facts, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining actual judgment facts corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic graph when conflict exists between any two or more local judgment facts.

In particular, the above statement content of the dispute focus is used to represent the statement of the original notice or the informed of the dispute focus in the court trial record. The local judgment facts are used to represent judgment facts corresponding to the dispute focus, and the judgment facts represent judgment results of the dispute focus.

And mapping the statement content corresponding to the dispute focus into a legal logic atlas, namely assigning the focus according to the statement content corresponding to the dispute focus, so as to obtain the local judgment fact.

The global optimization process may be global assignment optimization (global optimization), and if conclusions from two or more local determination facts are contradictory, the two or more local determination facts collide, and when a conflict exists between any two or more local determination facts, the actual determination corresponding to the dispute focus is determined in real time through dependency maximization.

Dependency refers to a relationship in which a change in one of the multiple points of dispute affects another of the multiple points of disputes, and in an alternative embodiment, global optimization is used to select as actual decision real-time local decision facts that minimize the number of collisions in the overall legal logic map, or local decision facts that make the number of collisions in the overall legal logic map less than a preset value.

As an alternative embodiment, combining the second decision facts obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first decision facts to generate legal fact entities includes: under the condition of successful mapping to the first judgment facts and the second judgment facts, determining an activation area of case information and court trial records in the legal logic atlas, wherein the mapping is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic atlas are activated, and the activation area is formed by the area where the activated nodes in the legal logic atlas are located; and in the activation area, processing the case information and the court trial record by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain legal fact entities serving as judge results.

Specifically, the activated region refers to a region of a node corresponding to original complaint content in a legal logic diagram, wherein the region of the node in the legal logic diagram refers to an upstream node and a downstream node having a direct or indirect connection relationship with the node, and similarly, the inactivated region refers to a region of a node corresponding to original complaint content in the legal logic diagram.

Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of an alternative legal logic diagram according to embodiment 1 of the present application, and in combination with fig. 4, the referee result includes refund and triple compensation, where node 41 is used to indicate whether price fraud is occurring, node 42 is used to indicate whether there is an absolute description, node 43 is used to indicate whether medical terms are applicable, and node 44 is used to indicate whether the original is a consumer, where the original does not mention litigation on the reported absolute description, i.e. the trial element corresponding to node 42 is the content of the original not mentioning litigation, and thus, node 42, and all its upstream nodes are inactive areas (represented by black circles in fig. 4), and the original mentioning litigation on other discrimination points, and thus, other nodes and their upstream nodes are all in active areas (represented by white circles in fig. 4).

Specifically, the uncertain reasoning technology refers to a process of reasoning a certain degree of uncertainty, but a reasonable or nearly reasonable conclusion by using uncertain indication or rule from the evidence of uncertainty. When the uncertain reasoning technology is applied to the scheme, the case information and the court trial record have certain uncertainty, and the legal indication map has certain uncertainty, so that the deduced legal fact entity also has certain uncertainty, but is reasonable.

As an alternative embodiment, in the activation area, the case information is processed by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain a referee result, including: based on the association information and the direction information among a plurality of nodes in the legal logic atlas, traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas to obtain nodes for pointing to judge results corresponding to the case information; and taking the legal fact entity pointed by the obtained node as a judge result.

Specifically, since the association relationship (for example, the logical relationship) among the plurality of nodes in the legal logic atlas has directionality, the legal logic atlas can be traversed along the logical relationship direction according to the logical reasoning rule in the legal logic atlas until the legal entity is pointed, and the pointed legal entity is used as the final judge result.

As an alternative embodiment, in the activation area, the case information is processed by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain a referee result, including: vectorizing each node in the legal logic map to obtain a legal logic map based on vectorization representation; on the legal logic map based on vectorization representation, randomly walking on the legal logic map based on case information and court trial records, and determining a probability value corresponding to each walking node; and under the condition that the probability value of the node which is moved is larger than the preset probability, continuing to move the next node until the node for representing the judging result is obtained.

Optionally, according to the logic inference rule in the legal logic atlas, traversing on the logic atlas along the logic relation direction, calculating the probability value corresponding to each node, and comparing the probability value of the node with the preset probability value, for example, the probability value corresponding to the node 1 is 80%, the preset probability value is 90%, and the probability value of the node 1 is smaller than the preset probability value, so that the judge inference module does not judge the case to be judged by adopting the content corresponding to the node 1, and does not traverse the next node of the node 1. If the probability value corresponding to the node 2 is 95%, and the preset probability value is 90%, and the probability value of the node 2 is greater than the preset probability value, the judge reasoning module judges the case to be judged by adopting the content corresponding to the node 2, and continues to traverse the next node of the node 2.

As an optional embodiment, after analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic map to obtain the judge result, the method further includes: receiving feedback information of a target object aiming at a judging result; and adjusting the judge result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

Specifically, the feedback information can be sent by a judge, the disputed focus is a risk point when the judge is judged, and after the algorithm feeds back the finally obtained judge result and the disputed focus to the judge through an interactive interface, the judge determines whether to determine or modify the disputed focus, and the information is the feedback information. After the judge modifies the assignment of the dispute focus, the judge result needs to be adjusted according to the dispute focus modified by the judge.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing an interactive interface of an algorithm presented to a judge according to embodiment 1 of the present application, and in combination with FIG. 5, a question point is used to represent a risk point, i.e. a dispute focus, and an inspection point is a referee result, wherein each question or inspection point is followed by an opinion given by the algorithm, wherein a black solid circle indicates that the algorithm suggests approval, a white solid circle indicates that the algorithm suggests disapproval, and a label with "no" and "approved" is provided for the judge to select after each question and inspection point, and the judge feeds back information to the system by selecting the label with "disapproval" or "approved", and the system re-traverses the law logic diagram according to the information fed back by the judge, so as to adjust the referee result.

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining a case referee result according to embodiment 1 of the present application, and in conjunction with fig. 6, in general, although the original and reported complaints and dialects are presented before the court trial, both parties provide new information during the court trial stage, such as: appeal, evidence, etc. Therefore, the algorithm obtains more accurate judging results through the information updating and complementing in the court trial stage.

Firstly, acquiring case information (which can comprise prosecution books, answer books and evidences) submitted before court trial through information extraction/data mining, and then acquiring legal logic atlas constructed in advance.

When the system judges cases, not only case information submitted before court trial is mapped in legal logic atlas, but also court trial records generated in the court trial process are analyzed and mapped in the legal logic atlas.

The system automatically performs judge reasoning based on legal logic atlas according to the case information and court trial record, and displays the reasoning result on the interactive interface of the judge, the judge feeds back according to the dispute focus and the reasoning result displayed in the interface to indicate whether to agree with the result of automatic reasoning of the system, and the system adjusts the reasoning result according to the feedback information of the judge to obtain the final judge result.

The scheme is characterized in that in the court trial stage, the anti-dialectic contents of both parties of the dispute problem are extracted in a structured mode and mapped on a logic map, so that more accurate information is provided for the system to judge and reason. More specifically, element extraction and dispute focus identification are performed according to court trial content, the dispute focus is mapped on a logic map, and questions and replies of two parties for dispute focus and questions of a judge for original informed questions are dynamically mapped and assigned to activated nodes in the logic map.

It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the foregoing method embodiments are all described as a series of acts, but it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by the order of acts described, as some steps may be performed in other orders or concurrently in accordance with the present invention. Further, those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required for the present invention.

From the description of the above embodiments, it will be clear to a person skilled in the art that the method according to the above embodiments may be implemented by means of software plus the necessary general hardware platform, but of course also by means of hardware, but in many cases the former is a preferred embodiment. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied essentially or in a part contributing to the prior art in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium (e.g. ROM/RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) comprising several instructions for causing a terminal device (which may be a mobile phone, a computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform the method of the various embodiments of the present invention.

Example 2

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided a method for obtaining a case referee result, and fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining a case referee result according to embodiment 2 of the present application, as shown in fig. 7, where the method includes:

step S71, displaying case information of the to-be-refereed cases submitted before the court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

The court trial records refer to the text records of all trial interaction real conditions in the court trial process. Wherein the complaint information may include prosecution information of the original notice to the notice in the court trial process, and the prosecution information may include prosecution of the original notice/the counsel or the representative lawyer in the court trial process; the source of the new evidence information is still not limited, and the new evidence information can be a new witness's witness in the court trial process, and can be evidence information which is presented in the court trial process by original notices or notices and is different from evidence information submitted before the court trial.

Step S73, analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

As an optional embodiment, after the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed based on the legal logic atlas, so as to obtain a judge result, the method further includes: displaying feedback information input by a target object aiming at a judging result; and displaying the judge result adjusted based on the feedback information.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing an interactive interface of an algorithm presented to a judge according to an embodiment of the present application, and in combination with FIG. 7, a problem point is used to represent a risk point, i.e. a dispute focus, and an inspection point is a referee result, wherein each problem or inspection point is followed by an opinion given by the algorithm, wherein a black solid circle indicates that the algorithm suggests approval, a white solid circle indicates that the algorithm suggests disapproval, labels with "no" and "approved" are provided for the judge to select after each problem and inspection point, the judge feeds back information to the system by selecting the "disapproval" or "approved" label, and the system re-traverses the law logic diagram according to the information fed back by the judge, and adjusts the referee result.

Example 3

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided a method for obtaining a case referee result, and fig. 8 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining a case referee result according to embodiment 3 of the present application, as shown in fig. 8, where the method includes:

step S81, acquiring case information of a case to be refereed, which has been submitted before a court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer dialect and evidence information.

And step S83, analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an initial judge result.

It should be noted that, the legal logic diagram mainly includes:

Specifically, the case information is analyzed and processed based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an initial judge result, or the case information is extracted to obtain a keyword, the keyword is mapped into the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas is traversed to obtain the initial judge result determined according to the case information.

Step S85, receiving a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

Specifically, the court trial record refers to the text record of all trial interaction real conditions in the court trial process. Wherein the complaint information may include prosecution information of the original notice to the notice in the court trial process, and the prosecution information may include prosecution of the original notice/the counsel or the representative lawyer in the court trial process; the source of the new evidence information is still not limited, and the new evidence information can be a new witness's witness in the court trial process, and can be evidence information which is presented in the court trial process by original notices or notices and is different from evidence information submitted before the court trial.

And step S87, analyzing and processing the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result.

Specifically, since the court trial records record the anti-dialectic contents of the original and the informed parties to the dispute problem in the court trial stage, the anti-dialectic contents recorded in the court trial records are extracted in a structured mode, mapped on a legal logic map, and assigned to the mapped nodes in the logic map based on the questions and replies of the original informed questions and the disputes of the two parties to the dispute focus, so that an anti-dialectic result is obtained, namely, the result of analysis of the court trial records by the legal logic map.

Step S89, adjusting an initial referee result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain the referee result, wherein the legal logic diagram at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

Since both the original and the interview may be presented with new information during the court trial, for example: appeal, evidence, etc., so that the initial outcome can be adjusted using the anti-dialect outcome in order to output a more accurate referee outcome. For example, the initial referee result and the anti-dialect result are subjected to a preset logic operation, so that a final referee result is obtained.

The embodiment of the application acquires case information of the case to be refereed, which has been submitted before the court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer dialect and evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an initial judge result; and receiving a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result; and adjusting an initial referee result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain the referee result, wherein the legal logic diagram at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate. Compared with the mode of neglecting the trial records and determining the judge result by only using the case information, the scheme maps the information possibly changed or modified in the trial process into the legal logic map, so that the judge result has higher accuracy.

Example 4

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided a method for obtaining a case referee result, and fig. 9 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining a case referee result according to embodiment 4 of the present application, as shown in fig. 9, where the method includes:

step S91, acquiring case information of the to-be-refereed cases submitted before the court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

And step S93, analyzing and processing the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result.

Step S95, analyzing the case information based on the legal logic atlas and combining the anti-dialect result to obtain a referee result, wherein the referee result is used for representing the case information and the legal fact entity obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

The case information is analyzed and processed based on the legal logic atlas, and the case information can be extracted to obtain keywords, the keywords are mapped into the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas is traversed to obtain an reasoning result obtained by reasoning according to the case information.

In an alternative embodiment, anti-dialectic information can be obtained based on legal logic atlas according to court trial records, and then reasoning is performed according to case information to obtain a corresponding reasoning result. In the reasoning process, combining the anti-dialectic result, carrying out dynamic mapping on assignment of the dispute focus to obtain a final reasoning result.

In an alternative embodiment, anti-dialectic information can be obtained based on legal logic atlas according to court trial record, reasoning is performed according to case information to obtain corresponding reasoning results, and then adjustment is performed on the anti-dialectic information according to the reasoning results to obtain final reasoning results.

The embodiment of the application acquires the case information of the to-be-refereed case submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result; and analyzing the case information based on the legal logic atlas, and combining the anti-dialectic result to obtain a referee result. Compared with the mode of neglecting the trial records and determining the judge result by only using the case information, the scheme maps the information possibly changed or modified in the trial process into the legal logic map, so that the judge result has higher accuracy.

Example 5

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided an apparatus for acquiring case referee results for implementing the method for acquiring case referee results in embodiment 1, where fig. 10 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for acquiring case referee results according to embodiment 5 of the present application, and as shown in fig. 10, the apparatus 100 includes:

the obtaining module 102 is configured to obtain case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial, and a court trial record in a court trial process, where the case information includes at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

The analysis module 104 is configured to analyze and process the case information and the court trial record based on a legal logic atlas, so as to obtain a judge result, where the legal logic atlas at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

It should be noted that, the above-mentioned obtaining module 102 and the analyzing module 104 correspond to step S21 to step S23 in embodiment 1, and the two modules are the same as the examples and application scenarios implemented by the corresponding steps, but are not limited to the disclosure of the above-mentioned embodiment one. It should be noted that the above-described module may be operated as a part of the apparatus in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

As an alternative embodiment, the analysis module comprises: the traversal submodule is used for traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas, and the obtained legal fact entity is used as a judge result; in the traversing process, mapping case information and court trial records onto legal logic maps respectively, and acquiring information for generating a judge result if the case information and the court trial records are mapped onto corresponding nodes successfully.

As an alternative embodiment, the traversal submodule includes: the first extraction unit is used for extracting at least one logic gist from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record, wherein the logic gist corresponds to a node in the legal logic atlas; a second extraction unit for deriving at least one dispute focus based on at least one logical point; a mapping unit, configured to map a first decision fact from the legal logic map based on each dispute focus and context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and the combining unit is used for combining the second judgment facts obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment facts to generate legal fact entities.

As an alternative embodiment, the first extraction unit comprises: the identifying subunit is used for identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record; the matching subunit is used for matching with the nodes in the legal logic atlas based on the identified keywords, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following components: name, attribute, and semantic information; and the first determination subunit is used for taking the node with the similarity exceeding the threshold value in the matching result as a logic gist.

As an alternative embodiment, the second extraction unit comprises: the first acquisition subunit is used for acquiring sentences containing at least one logic gist and marking the logic gist, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations; and the generation subunit is used for clustering the marked at least one logic key point and generating at least one dispute focus.

As an alternative embodiment, the second extraction unit further comprises: the classification subunit is used for classifying all the disputed focuses after clustering the marked at least one logic key point to generate at least one dispute focus to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute focuses, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute focuses; and the second determination subunit is used for taking sentences corresponding to each group of disputed focuses as context information.

As an alternative embodiment, the mapping unit comprises: a second acquisition subunit, configured to acquire, from the context information of each dispute focus, a statement content of the corresponding dispute focus; the mapping sub-module is used for mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into a legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts; and the optimization sub-module is used for carrying out global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain a first judgment fact, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining the actual judgment fact corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic map when conflict exists between any two or more local judgment facts.

As an alternative embodiment, the combining unit includes: the third determining subunit is used for determining the case information and the activation area recorded in the legal logic atlas in the case of successful mapping to the first judging facts and the second judging facts, wherein the mapping success is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic atlas are activated, and the activation area is formed by the area where the activated nodes in the legal logic atlas are located; and the processing subunit is used for processing the case information and the court trial record by using an uncertainty reasoning technology in the activation area to obtain legal fact entities serving as judge results.

As an alternative embodiment, the processing subunit comprises: the third obtaining subunit is used for traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas based on the association information and the direction information among the plurality of nodes in the legal logic atlas to obtain the node for pointing to the judge result corresponding to the case information; and the fourth acquisition subunit is used for taking the legal fact entity pointed by the acquired node as a judge result.

As an alternative embodiment, the processing subunit comprises: the vectorization processing unit carries out vectorization processing on each node in the legal logic atlas to obtain the legal logic atlas based on vectorization representation; the fourth determining subunit is used for randomly walking on the legal logic atlas based on the vectorization representation and on the legal logic atlas based on the case information and the court trial record to determine the probability value corresponding to each node which is walked; and the walking subunit is used for continuing to walk the next node until the node for representing the judging result is obtained under the condition that the probability value of the walking node is larger than the preset probability.

As an alternative embodiment, the above device further comprises: the receiving module is used for receiving feedback information of the target object aiming at the judge result after analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic map to obtain the judge result; and the adjusting module is used for adjusting the judge result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

Example 6

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided an apparatus for acquiring case referee results for implementing the method for acquiring case referee results in embodiment 2, where fig. 11 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for acquiring case referee results according to embodiment 6 of the present application, and as shown in fig. 11, the apparatus 110 includes:

the first display module 112 is configured to display case information of a case to be refereed, which has been submitted before a court trial, and a court trial record in a court trial process, where the case information includes at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

The second display module 114 is configured to display that the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, where the legal logic map at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

It should be noted that, the first display module 112 and the second display module 114 correspond to steps S71 to S73 in embodiment 2, and the two modules are the same as the examples and application scenarios implemented by the corresponding steps, but are not limited to the disclosure of the first embodiment. It should be noted that the above-described module may be operated as a part of the apparatus in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

As an alternative embodiment, the above device further comprises: the third display module is used for displaying feedback information input by the target object for the judge result after analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain the judge result; and the fourth display module is used for displaying the judge result adjusted based on the feedback information.

Example 7

There is further provided an apparatus for acquiring case referee results for implementing the method for acquiring case referee results in embodiment 3, fig. 12 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for acquiring case referee results according to embodiment 7 of the present application, as shown in fig. 12, and the apparatus 120 includes:

the obtaining module 122 is configured to obtain case information of a case to be refereed, which has been submitted before a court trial, where the case information includes at least one of the following: prosecution, answer dialect and evidence information.

And the processing module 124 is used for analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an initial judge result.

The receiving module 126 is configured to receive a court trial record in a court trial process, where the court trial record includes at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

And the analysis module 128 is used for analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result.

The adjustment module 1210 is configured to adjust an initial referee result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain a referee result, where the legal logic diagram at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

It should be noted that, the above-mentioned obtaining module 122, processing module 124, receiving module 126, analyzing module 128 and analyzing module 128 correspond to steps S81 to S89 in embodiment 3, and the five modules are the same as the corresponding steps in terms of implementation and application, but are not limited to the disclosure of the above-mentioned embodiment one. It should be noted that the above-described module may be operated as a part of the apparatus in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

Example 8

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided an apparatus for acquiring case referee results for implementing the method for acquiring case referee results in embodiment 4, where fig. 13 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for acquiring case referee results according to embodiment 8 of the present application, and as shown in fig. 13, the apparatus 130 includes:

the obtaining module 132 is configured to obtain case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial, and a court trial record in a court trial process, where the case information includes at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

the processing module 134 is configured to analyze and process the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas, so as to obtain an anti-dialect result;

the combination module 136 is configured to analyze the case information based on a legal logic atlas, and combine the anti-dialect result to obtain a referee result, where the referee result is used to characterize the case information and the legal fact entity obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

It should be noted that, the above-mentioned obtaining module 132, processing module 134 and combining module 136 correspond to steps S91 to S95 in embodiment 4, and the five modules are the same as the examples and application scenarios implemented by the corresponding steps, but are not limited to the disclosure of the above-mentioned embodiment one. It should be noted that the above-described module may be operated as a part of the apparatus in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

Example 9

Embodiments of the present invention may provide a computer terminal, which may be any one of a group of computer terminals. Alternatively, in the present embodiment, the above-described computer terminal may be replaced with a terminal device such as a mobile terminal.

Alternatively, in this embodiment, the above-mentioned computer terminal may be located in at least one network device among a plurality of network devices of the computer network.

In this embodiment, the computer terminal may execute the program code of the following steps in the vulnerability detection method of the application program: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate. .

Alternatively, fig. 14 is a block diagram of a computer terminal according to embodiment 9 of the present invention. As shown in fig. 9, the computer terminal a may include: one or more (only one shown) processors 902, memory 904, and an external device 906.

The memory may be used to store software programs and modules, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the security vulnerability detection method and device in the embodiments of the present invention, and the processor executes various functional applications and data processing by running the software programs and modules stored in the memory, thereby implementing the above-mentioned method for detecting a system vulnerability attack. The memory may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic storage devices, flash memory, or other non-volatile solid-state memory. In some examples, the memory may further include memory remotely located with respect to the processor, which may be connected to terminal a through a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

The processor may call the information and the application program stored in the memory through the transmission device to perform the following steps: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: traversing the case information and the court trial record in a legal logic map, and taking the obtained legal fact entity as a judge result; in the traversing process, mapping case information and court trial records onto legal logic maps respectively, and acquiring information for generating a judge result if the case information and the court trial records are mapped onto corresponding nodes successfully.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: extracting at least one logic gist from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record, wherein the logic gist corresponds to a node in the legal logic atlas; obtaining at least one point of dispute based on the at least one logical point; mapping from the legal logic map to obtain a first judgment fact based on each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and combining the second judgment facts obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment facts to generate legal fact entities.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record; based on the identified keywords, matching with nodes in the legal logic graph, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following: name, attribute, and semantic information; and taking the node with the similarity exceeding the threshold value in the matching result as a logic gist.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: acquiring sentences containing at least one logic gist, and marking the logic gist, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations; clustering the marked at least one logical point to generate at least one dispute focus.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: after clustering at least one marked logical point to generate at least one dispute focus, classifying all the dispute focuses to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute focuses, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute focuses; and taking sentences corresponding to each group of disputed focuses as context information.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: acquiring statement content of each dispute focus from the context information of the corresponding dispute focus; mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into a legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts; and performing global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain first judgment facts, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining actual judgment facts corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic graph when conflict exists between any two or more local judgment facts.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: under the condition of successful mapping to the first judgment facts and the second judgment facts, determining an activation area of case information and court trial records in the legal logic atlas, wherein the mapping is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic atlas are activated, and the activation area is formed by the area where the activated nodes in the legal logic atlas are located; and in the activation area, processing the case information and the court trial record by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain legal fact entities serving as judge results.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: based on the association information and the direction information among a plurality of nodes in the legal logic atlas, traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas to obtain nodes for pointing to judge results corresponding to the case information; and taking the legal fact entity pointed by the obtained node as a judge result.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: vectorizing each node in the legal logic map to obtain a legal logic map based on vectorization representation; on the legal logic map based on vectorization representation, randomly walking on the legal logic map based on case information and court trial records, and determining a probability value corresponding to each walking node; and under the condition that the probability value of the node which is moved is larger than the preset probability, continuing to move the next node until the node for representing the judging result is obtained.

Optionally, the above processor may further execute program code for: after the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, receiving feedback information of a target object aiming at the judge result; and adjusting the judge result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

The embodiment of the invention provides a method for acquiring a case judge result. The method and the device have the advantages that the case information of the case to be refereed, which is submitted before the court trial, and the court trial record in the court trial process are obtained, and based on the legal logic atlas, analysis is carried out together according to the case information and the court trial record, so that the referee result is determined, and compared with the mode that the referee result is determined by only using the case information in the mode that the court trial record is ignored, the scheme in the method and the device map the information possibly changed or modified in the court trial process in the legal logic atlas, so that the referee result has higher accuracy.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the configuration shown in fig. 14 is merely illustrative, and the computer terminal may be a smart phone (such as an Android phone, an iOS phone, etc.), a tablet computer, a palm-phone computer, a mobile internet device (Mobile Internet Devices, MID), a PAD, etc. Fig. 14 is not limited to the structure of the electronic device. For example, the computer terminal a may also include more or fewer components (such as a network interface, a display device, etc.) than shown in fig. 14, or have a different configuration than shown in fig. 14.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps in the various methods of the above embodiments may be implemented by a program for instructing a terminal device to execute in association with hardware, the program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and the storage medium may include: flash disk, read-Only Memory (ROM), random-access Memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), magnetic or optical disk, and the like.

Example 4

The embodiment of the invention also provides a storage medium. Alternatively, in this embodiment, the storage medium may be used to store program code executed by the method for acquiring case referees according to the first embodiment.

Alternatively, in this embodiment, the storage medium may be located in any one of the computer terminals in the computer terminal group in the computer network, or in any one of the mobile terminals in the mobile terminal group.

Alternatively, in the present embodiment, the storage medium is configured to store program code for performing the steps of: acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, discrimination point and logic gate.

The foregoing embodiment numbers of the present invention are merely for the purpose of description, and do not represent the advantages or disadvantages of the embodiments.

In the foregoing embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of the embodiments are emphasized, and for a portion of this disclosure that is not described in detail in this embodiment, reference is made to the related descriptions of other embodiments.

In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology content may be implemented in other manners. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely exemplary, and the division of the units, such as the division of the units, is merely a logical function division, and may be implemented in another manner, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not performed. Alternatively, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed with each other may be through some interfaces, units or modules, or may be in electrical or other forms.

The units described as separate units may or may not be physically separate, and units shown as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

In addition, each functional unit in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated in one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated in one unit. The integrated units may be implemented in hardware or in software functional units.

The integrated units, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as stand-alone products, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied essentially or in part or all of the technical solution or in part in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium, including instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a random access Memory (RAM, random Access Memory), a removable hard disk, a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, or other various media capable of storing program codes.

The foregoing is merely a preferred embodiment of the present invention and it should be noted that modifications and adaptations to those skilled in the art may be made without departing from the principles of the present invention, which are intended to be comprehended within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for obtaining a case referee result, comprising:

acquiring case information of a case to be refereed submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, distinguishing key point and logic gate;

the method for analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain a judge result comprises the following steps: traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas; extracting at least one logic gist from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record, wherein the logic gist corresponds to a node in the legal logic atlas; obtaining at least one point of dispute based on the at least one logical point; mapping from the legal logic map to obtain a first judgment fact based on each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and combining the second judgment facts obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment facts to generate legal fact entities, and taking the obtained legal fact entities as judgment results.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein during traversing, the case information and the court trial record are mapped onto the legal logic atlas, respectively, and if mapping onto a corresponding node is successful, information for generating the referee result is obtained.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein extracting at least one logical point from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record comprises:

identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record;

based on the identified keywords, matching with nodes in the legal logic graph, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following: name, attribute, and semantic information;

and taking the node with the similarity exceeding the threshold value in the matching result as the logic gist.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein deriving at least one dispute focus based on the at least one logical point comprises:

acquiring sentences containing the at least one logic gist, and marking the logic gist, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations;

clustering the marked at least one logical gist to generate the at least one dispute focus.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein after clustering the at least one logical point of annotation to generate the at least one dispute focus, the method further comprises:

classifying all the dispute foci to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute foci, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute foci;

and taking sentences corresponding to each group of disputed focuses as the context information.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein mapping the first decision fact from the legal logic map based on each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus comprises:

acquiring statement content of each dispute focus from the context information of the corresponding dispute focus;

mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into the legal logic atlas to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts;

and carrying out global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain the first judgment facts, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining the actual judgment facts corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic atlas when conflict exists between any two or more local judgment facts.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein combining the second decision facts mapped by the case information in the legal logic map with the first decision facts to generate the legal fact entity comprises:

determining an activation region of the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas under the condition of successful mapping to the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact, wherein the mapping success is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic atlas are activated, and the activation region is composed of the region where the activated nodes in the legal logic atlas are located;

and processing the case information and the court trial record in the activation area by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain legal fact entities serving as the judge result.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein processing the case information and the court trial record within the activation region using an uncertainty inference technique to obtain a legal facts entity as a result of the referee comprises:

traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas based on the association information and the direction information among the plurality of nodes in the legal logic atlas, and acquiring nodes for pointing to judge results corresponding to the case information;

And taking the legal fact entity pointed by the acquired node as the judge result.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein processing the case information and the court trial record within the activation region using an uncertainty inference technique to obtain a legal facts entity as a result of the referee comprises:

vectorizing each node in the legal logic atlas to obtain a legal logic atlas based on vectorization representation;

on the legal logic atlas based on the vectorization representation, randomly walking on the legal logic atlas based on the case information and the court trial record, and determining a probability value corresponding to each walking node;

and under the condition that the probability value of the node which is moved is larger than the preset probability, continuing to move the next node until the node for representing the judging result is obtained.

10. The method according to claim 8 or 9, wherein after analyzing the case information and the court trial record based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, the method further comprises:

receiving feedback information of a target object aiming at the judge result;

And adjusting the judge result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

11. A method for obtaining a referee result for a case, comprising:

displaying case information of the to-be-refereed cases submitted before the court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information, the court trial record including at least one of: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

and displaying that the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed based on legal logic patterns to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic patterns at least comprise: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, distinguishing key point and logic gate;

12. The method of claim 11, wherein after displaying the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic map for analysis, the method further comprises:

displaying feedback information input by a target object aiming at the judge result;

and displaying the judge result adjusted based on the feedback information.

13. A method for obtaining a case referee result, comprising:

acquiring case information of a case to be refereed, which is submitted before court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer dialect and evidence information;

analyzing and processing the case information based on legal logic atlas to obtain an initial judge result;

receiving a court trial record in a court trial process, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

analyzing and processing the court trial record based on the legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result;

and adjusting the initial referee result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain a referee result, wherein the legal logic diagram at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, distinguishing key point and logic gate;

The method comprises the steps of analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial record based on legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result, wherein the method comprises the following steps of: traversing the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic atlas; extracting at least one logic gist from the legal logic atlas based on the court trial record, wherein the logic gist corresponds to a node in the legal logic atlas; obtaining at least one point of dispute based on the at least one logical point; mapping from the legal logic map to obtain a first judgment fact based on each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and combining the second judgment facts obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment facts to generate legal fact entities, and taking the obtained legal fact entities as anti-dialectic results.

14. A method for obtaining a case referee result, comprising:

Analyzing and processing the court trial records based on legal logic atlas to obtain an anti-dialectic result;

analyzing the case information based on the legal logic atlas, and combining the anti-dialect result to obtain a referee result, wherein the referee result is used for representing the case information and legal fact entities obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic atlas, and the legal logic atlas at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association relation and direction information between each node, each node being for characterizing one of: element, distinguishing key point and logic gate;

15. A system for obtaining case referee results, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory, coupled to the processor, for providing instructions to the processor to process the following processing steps: