CN110858353A

CN110858353A - Method and system for obtaining case referee result

Info

Publication number: CN110858353A
Application number: CN201810941506.0A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 张雅婷; 周鑫; 李泉志; 孙常龙; 刘晓钟; 司罗
Original assignee: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
Current assignee: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
Priority date: 2018-08-17
Filing date: 2018-08-17
Publication date: 2020-03-03
Anticipated expiration: 2038-08-17
Also published as: CN110858353B

Abstract

The invention discloses a method and a system for acquiring case referee results. Wherein, the method comprises the following steps: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates. The invention solves the technical problem of low accuracy of the judgment result of the legal case in the prior art.

Description

Method and system for obtaining case referee result

Technical Field

The invention relates to the field of laws, in particular to a method and a system for acquiring case referee results.

Background

With the development of the internet, a plurality of devices realize intellectualization, and bring a plurality of convenience for the life and work of people. The intelligent system such as an intelligent judicial system or an internet court converts information in a paper or picture form into text messages by an OCR (Optical character recognition) technology, and performs information structuring on a plurality of extracted text messages, so that a user (for example, a judge) can complete transaction disputes, litigation of keys of intellectual property rights and the like through the internet, thereby reducing the work tasks of law workers and improving the work efficiency of the law workers.

However, in the existing intelligent systems such as the intelligent judicial system or the internet court and the like, cases are judged only according to information submitted before court trial, and newly added information possibly generated in the court trial process is ignored, so that the accuracy of the obtained judgment result is low.

Aiming at the problem of low accuracy of judgment results of legal cases in the prior art, no effective solution is provided at present.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a system for obtaining case judgment results, which at least solve the technical problem of low accuracy of judgment results of legal cases in the prior art.

According to an aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method for obtaining case referee results, including: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: and displaying case information of the to-be-cut case submitted before the court trial and court trial records in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; and displaying the case information and the court trial records to be analyzed and processed based on the legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: acquiring case information of a case to be judged which is submitted before a court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic map to obtain an initial judgment result; receiving a court trial record in a court trial process, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result; adjusting the initial judgment result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result; analyzing the case information based on the legal logic map, and combining an anti-discriminative result to obtain a referee result, wherein the referee result is used for representing the case information and a legal fact entity obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic map, and the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is also provided a system for obtaining a referee result of a case, including: a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor for providing instructions to the processor for processing the following processing steps: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

In the embodiment of the invention, the case information of the case to be judged which is submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process are obtained, and the case information and the court trial record are jointly analyzed based on the legal logic map, so that the referee result is determined.

Therefore, the technical problem that the accuracy of the judgment result of the legal case is low in the prior art is solved by the embodiment of the application.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention without limiting the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a hardware structure of a computer terminal (or mobile device) for implementing a method for obtaining case referee results;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a legal logic map according to example 1 of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of an alternative legal logic map according to example 1 of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an interactive interface presented to a judge by an algorithm according to example 1 of the present application;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application;

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 2 of the present application;

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 3 of the present application;

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 4 of the present application;

FIG. 10 is a schematic view of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to example 5 of the present application;

FIG. 11 is a schematic view of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 6 of the present application;

FIG. 12 is a schematic view of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 7 of the present application;

FIG. 13 is a schematic view of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to the embodiment 8 of the present application; and

fig. 14 is a block diagram of a computer terminal according to embodiment 9 of the present invention.

Detailed Description

In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present invention and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

First, some terms or terms appearing in the description of the embodiments of the present application are applicable to the following explanations:

the key points of the logic are as follows: i.e. a certain node on the legal logic map, i.e. usually a discriminant entity.

The dispute focus is as follows: the core focus of the former and the latter is resistant to the differentiation. In the present application, the dispute focus may be mapped to a node on the logical graph. In presentation, the court trial records are typically discussed around a dispute focus in the form of one or more sets of conversations.

Example 1

There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an embodiment of a method of obtaining case referent results, to the extent that the steps illustrated in the flowchart of the figure can be performed in a computer system such as a set of computer-executable instructions, and although a logical order is illustrated in the flowchart, in some cases the steps illustrated or described can be performed in an order different than here.

The method provided by the first embodiment of the present application may be executed in a mobile terminal, a computer terminal, or a similar computing device. Fig. 1 shows a hardware configuration block diagram of a computer terminal (or mobile device) for implementing a method for obtaining case referee results. As shown in fig. 1, the computer terminal 10 (or mobile device 10) may include one or more (shown as 102a, 102b, … …, 102 n) processors 102 (the processors 102 may include, but are not limited to, a processing device such as a microprocessor MCU or a programmable logic device FPGA, etc.), a memory 104 for storing data, and a transmission module 106 for communication functions. Besides, the method can also comprise the following steps: a display, an input/output interface (I/O interface), a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port (which may be included as one of the ports of the I/O interface), a network interface, a power source, and/or a camera. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the structure shown in fig. 1 is only an illustration and is not intended to limit the structure of the electronic device. For example, the computer terminal 10 may also include more or fewer components than shown in FIG. 1, or have a different configuration than shown in FIG. 1.

It should be noted that the one or more processors 102 and/or other data processing circuitry described above may be referred to generally herein as "data processing circuitry". The data processing circuitry may be embodied in whole or in part in software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. Further, the data processing circuit may be a single stand-alone processing module, or incorporated in whole or in part into any of the other elements in the computer terminal 10 (or mobile device). As referred to in the embodiments of the application, the data processing circuit acts as a processor control (e.g. selection of a variable resistance termination path connected to the interface).

The memory 104 may be used to store software programs and modules of application software, such as program instructions/data storage devices corresponding to the method for obtaining case judgment results in the embodiment of the present invention, and the processor 102 executes various functional applications and data processing by running the software programs and modules stored in the memory 104, so as to implement the vulnerability detection method of the application program. The memory 104 may include high speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic storage devices, flash memory, or other non-volatile solid-state memory. In some examples, the memory 104 may further include memory located remotely from the processor 102, which may be connected to the computer terminal 10 via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

The transmission device 106 is used for receiving or transmitting data via a network. Specific examples of the network described above may include a wireless network provided by a communication provider of the computer terminal 10. In one example, the transmission device 106 includes a Network adapter (NIC) that can be connected to other Network devices through a base station to communicate with the internet. In one example, the transmission device 106 can be a Radio Frequency (RF) module, which is used to communicate with the internet in a wireless manner.

The display may be, for example, a touch screen type Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) that may enable a user to interact with a user interface of the computer terminal 10 (or mobile device).

It should be noted here that in some alternative embodiments, the computer device (or mobile device) shown in fig. 1 described above may include hardware elements (including circuitry), software elements (including computer code stored on a computer-readable medium), or a combination of both hardware and software elements. It should be noted that fig. 1 is only one example of a particular specific example and is intended to illustrate the types of components that may be present in the computer device (or mobile device) described above.

Under the operating environment, the application provides a method for obtaining case referee results as shown in fig. 2. Fig. 2 is a flowchart of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application.

Step S21, obtaining case information of the case to be judged submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

Specifically, the case information of the case to be refereed refers to information inherent to the legal case itself and already submitted before the court trial. In the execution process of the steps, the case information of the case to be judged can be obtained by the information extraction or data mining module, and the information extraction or information mining module can not only extract the case information of the legal case from the legal document corresponding to the legal case, but also mine the case information from other ways. For example: the prosecution and the answer of the books can be legal documents, and the evidence information can be retained network data, for example, for a claim dispute of a counterfeit and shoddy commodity, information such as commodity price, actual transaction price, refund, seller credit and buying point credit can be extracted from an evidence transaction log as evidence.

Court trial records refer to written records reflecting the actual conditions of all trial interactions synchronously in the court trial process. The complaint information can comprise complaint information of original reports on the reports in the court trial process, and the answer information can comprise the dialect of the original reports/the reports or representative lawyers in the court trial process for answering the statement, the notice or the complaint; the source of the new evidence information is still not limited, and the new evidence information can be testimony of a new witness in the court trial process, can be provided in the court trial process of an original report or a reported report, and is different from the evidence information of the evidence information submitted before the court trial. In addition, information such as opinions stated by the judges during the court trial may also be included in the court trial record.

In the above-described step S21, the process of acquiring the case information may be performed before the court trial, and the process of acquiring the record may be performed during the court trial or after the court trial is completed.

Step S23, analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

Alternatively, fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a legal logic map according to embodiment 1 of the present application, where "number of litigation actions in the chinese judge document network", "number of litigation actions in the internet court" and "whether to return an abuse" are elements in fig. 3, whether to return a self-perceived abuse "," whether to refer to a self-perceived abuse "," whether to return the chinese judge document network litigation 3 times or more "," whether to return the internet court litigation 3 times or more "are decision points, or" is a logic gate.

It should be noted that the composition of the legal logic map mainly includes:

(1) an entity. In the present application, the entities of the legal logical map mainly include objective factual elements and legal elements. In fig. 3, the objective fact elements are "number of litigation in the web of referees in china" and "number of litigation in the internet court", and the legal element is "whether to abuse the material".

(2) And (4) relationship. In the present application, the relationship of the legal logical map may refer to an attribute relationship and a logical relationship. For example, in FIG. 3, the relationship between the various legal elements is an "OR" relationship.

(3) A triplet. The following three are mainly included in the application: "objective fact element-attribute relationship-objective fact element" (e.g., "original report-attribute relationship-identification number"), "objective fact element-logical relationship-legal element" (e.g., "commodity description-logical relationship-whether or not there is a medical effect advertised"), "legal element-logical relationship-legal element" (e.g., "whether or not original price is fictional-logical relationship-whether or not price is discounted wrong").

And analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on the legal logic map, wherein the case information and the court trial records can be used as input information of the legal logic map, and the legal map is traversed to obtain a final judgment result.

In an alternative embodiment, after the case information and the case information are obtained, the case information and the case information are mapped into a legal logic map, and the legal logic map outputs a final judgment result according to the case information and the case information.

In another alternative embodiment, after the case information is acquired, the case information may be input to the legal logic map, and the referee result obtained according to the case information may be acquired. After the court trial record is obtained, the court trial record can be input into the legal logic map, a referee result obtained according to the court trial record is obtained, and under the condition that the referee result obtained according to the case information is different from the referee result obtained according to the court trial record, the referee result obtained according to the case information is used for adjusting the referee result obtained according to the case information, so that a final referee result is obtained.

It should be noted here that, before court trial, corresponding case information needs to be submitted to a court, a judge may pre-judge the case according to the case information submitted before court trial, but during court trial, the original report or the reported report may provide new evidence, and the answer information and the complaint information may be different from the answer and the prosecution submitted before court trial, so if the case information submitted before court trial is analyzed based on the legal logic map to obtain the result of the judgment, court trial records generated during the court trial may be omitted, and the result of the judgment is inaccurate.

In the above embodiments of the present application, the case information of the case to be judged that has been submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process are obtained, and the analysis is performed according to the case information and the court trial record based on the legal logic map, so as to determine the referee result.

As an alternative embodiment, the case information and the court trial records are analyzed and processed based on the legal logic map to obtain the referee result, which includes: traversing the case information and the court trial records in a legal logic map to obtain legal fact entities serving as judgment results; in the traversing process, case information and court trial records are respectively mapped to the legal logic map, and if the case information and the court trial records are successfully mapped to corresponding nodes, information used for generating a judgment result is acquired.

Specifically, the legal facts refer to objective conditions that can cause legal relationships to be generated, changed and eliminated by law. Legal fact entity refers to a node in the legal logical graph for representing legal fact.

In the above scheme, the case information and the court trial records are traversed in the legal logical graph to obtain the judgment result, the traversal can be used for representing that the case information and the court trial records are searched or searched in the legal logical graph, in the traversing process, the case information and the court trial records need to be mapped to corresponding nodes of the legal logical graph, and in the process of mapping the case information or the court trial records to nodes on the legal logical graph, the nodes mapped to the case information and the court trial records can be assigned according to the case information and the court trial records.

In an alternative embodiment, the case information may include a prosecution, an answer, evidence information, and the like, and in order to determine the node of the mapping of the case information in the legal logic map, keywords in the case information may be obtained through information extraction, for example: and searching nodes corresponding to the keywords in the legal logic map, namely the nodes mapped by the case information on the legal logic map, for original information in the prosecution book, the information to be reported in the answer book and the like.

The court trial records comprise complaint information, answer information, new evidence information and the like, and in the process of traversing the legal logical map, the court trial records can be converted into corresponding vectors through semantic analysis on the court trial records, and the nodes mapped on the legal logical map are determined through the vectors corresponding to each statement in the court trial records.

After determining the nodes mapped in the legal logical graph by the case information and the court trial records, assigning the mapped nodes according to the case information or the court trial records, wherein the assignment is the information for generating the judgment result by the user.

Still taking fig. 3 as an example, for the node "number of litigation of the original report in the chinese umpire document network", the number of litigation of the original report in the chinese umpire document network may be extracted from the case information and mapped to the node, so that the node "number of litigation of the original report in the chinese umpire document network" in the legal logic map acquires information for generating the umpire result.

As an alternative embodiment, the case information and the court trial records are traversed in the legal logic map, and the obtained legal fact entity is used as a referee result, which includes: extracting at least one logic main point from the legal logic map based on the court trial record, wherein the logic main point corresponds to a node in the legal logic map; deriving at least one dispute focus based on the at least one logical gist; mapping to obtain a first judgment fact from a legal logic map based on each dispute focus and context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and combining the second judgment fact obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment fact to generate a legal fact entity.

Specifically, the extraction of at least one logical point may be to find the logical point corresponding to the court trial record from the legal logical map. In an alternative embodiment, each node in the legal logic map has corresponding description information for describing the name, attribute, and other information of the node. The method can perform matching according to the keywords of each sentence in the court trial record obtained by performing semantic analysis on the court trial record and the description information of the nodes, so as to obtain the corresponding relation between the court trial record and the nodes in the legal logical graph.

The dispute focus refers to a node which has important influence on the judgment result, and after the node mapped in the legal logic map of the court trial record is determined, the dispute focus needs to be determined based on the logic key point. The mode of determining the dispute focus may be to select a preset node in the legal logical graph as the dispute focus, or to extract the dispute focus from the logical main points according to a preset rule.

The context information corresponding to the dispute focus refers to the information associated with the dispute focus in the court trial record. In the scheme, the court trial records are mapped in the legal logic map to assign values to dispute focuses in the legal logic map so as to obtain a first judgment fact, case information is mapped in the legal logic map to assign values to dispute focuses in the legal logic map so as to obtain a second judgment fact, and the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact are traversed in the legal logic map so as to obtain a legal fact entity for expressing judgment results.

As an alternative embodiment, the method for extracting at least one logical point from the legal logical map based on the court trial record comprises the following steps: identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record; and matching with nodes in the legal logic map based on the identified keywords, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following: name, attribute, and semantic information; and taking the nodes with the similarity exceeding the threshold value in the matching result as the logic points.

In the scheme, the initial mapping is performed in the court trial record according to the nodes on the logical map, the corresponding logical main points of each sentence are identified, and the nodes in the legal logical map have corresponding description information, such as: name, attribute and semantic information, the node attribute can be used for representing whether the node is a legal fact entity or an objective fact entity, and the semantic information is used for further describing the node. The primary mapping mainly depends on the semantic information of the nodes on the graph, including the names of the nodes, the attribute notes of the nodes and the semantic information of each sentence

In an alternative embodiment, a TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequency, a commonly used weighting technique for information retrieval data mining) may be used to obtain keywords from court trial records, match the keywords of the court trial records with nodes in a legal logical graph, determine the similarity between each keyword and each node, and take the nodes with the similarity exceeding a threshold as logical key points. If the similarity between a keyword and a plurality of nodes exceeds a threshold value, the node with the maximum similarity to the keyword can be determined as a logic main point.

As an alternative embodiment, deriving at least one dispute focus based on at least one logical gist includes: obtaining sentences containing at least one logic essential point, and labeling the logic essential point, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations; and clustering at least one logic point of the label to generate at least one dispute focus.

After the logical key points are extracted from the legal logical map, each sentence in the court trial record is labeled with a logical key point, and the sentences are marked as the sentences of the labeled logical key points. In an alternative embodiment, each sentence in the court trial record is marked with at least one identifier, the identifier is used for representing a logical main point in the legal logical map, and the sentences with uniform identifiers are used as the sentences of the logical main points corresponding to the identifiers. The above scheme aims to identify and extract one or more groups of conversations around the dispute focus, facilitating the calculation of the assignment at each dispute focus.

It should be noted that, when labeling the logical essential points, in an optional embodiment, only some of all the logical essential points may be labeled, and only some of the labeled logical essential points are clustered in a subsequent clustering process under the condition that only some of the logical essential points are labeled, so that the processing method can enable the system to have higher processing efficiency in the process of obtaining a dispute focus; in another optional embodiment, all the logical points may be labeled or not labeled, and the embodiment in which all the logical points are labeled or not labeled realizes that all the logical points are clustered in the subsequent clustering process, and the obtained result accuracy of the dispute focus is relatively higher compared with the scheme in which part of the logical points are labeled.

Because the logical key points can be child nodes on the logical graph, and the dispute focus is generally regarded as a core key point, the marked logical key points can be clustered, and the preferred Clustering mode is hierarchical Clustering (hierarchical Clustering), so that nodes which are more important in the logical graph can be obtained, and the dispute focus obtained by Clustering can be used as the dispute focus. The hierarchical clustering process mainly depends on the dependency relationship among all the logic main points in the logic map. Since the connection of each node in the legal logic map is directional, the direction of hierarchical clustering is the same as that in the legal logic map.

As an alternative embodiment, after clustering at least one logical gist of a callout to generate at least one dispute focus, the method further comprises: classifying all the dispute focuses to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute focuses, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute focuses; and taking the statement corresponding to each group of dispute focuses as context information.

In the above scheme, after the logical key points are hierarchically clustered, a threshold value may be defined manually or automatically, a plurality of "classes" currently divided by the threshold value are used as a plurality of corresponding dispute focuses, and sentences included in each "class" are used as context materials for determining the assignment of the dispute focuses later.

As an alternative embodiment, the mapping, based on each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus, the first determination fact from the legal logic map includes: obtaining statement content of corresponding dispute focuses from the context information of each dispute focus; mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into a legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts; and performing global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain a first judgment fact, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining the actual judgment fact corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic map when any two or more local judgment facts are in conflict.

Specifically, the statement of the dispute focus is used to indicate the statement of the original report or the reported dispute focus in the court trial record. The local decision fact is used to indicate a decision fact corresponding to a dispute focus, which indicates a decision result for the dispute focus.

And mapping the statement content corresponding to the dispute focus into the legal logic map, namely assigning the focus according to the statement content corresponding to the dispute focus so as to obtain a local judgment fact.

The global optimization process may be global assignment optimization (global optimization), where if the conclusions obtained from two or more local decision facts are contrary, the two or more local decision facts are in conflict, and when there is a conflict between any two or more local decision facts, the actual decision corresponding to the dispute focus is determined in real time by maximizing the dependency relationship.

The dependency relationship refers to a relationship in which a change in one dispute focus affects another dispute focus among a plurality of dispute focuses, and in an alternative embodiment, the global optimization process is used to select a local judgment fact that minimizes the number of conflicts in the entire legal logic map as an actual judgment real time, or select a local judgment fact that makes the number of conflicts in the entire legal logic map smaller than a preset value as an actual judgment fact.

As an alternative embodiment, the step of combining the second determination fact obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logical map with the first determination fact to generate the legal fact entity includes: under the condition of successful mapping to the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact, determining an activation region of case information and court trial records in the legal logic map, wherein the successful mapping is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic map are activated, and the activation region is formed by the region where the activated nodes in the legal logic map are located; and in the activation area, case information and court trial records are processed by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain legal fact entities serving as judgment results.

Specifically, the activated region refers to a region of a node corresponding to the content of the original announcement, which is in the legal logic map, where the region of the node in the legal logic map refers to an upstream node and a downstream node that have a direct or indirect connection relationship with the node, and similarly, the inactivated region is a region of a node corresponding to the content of the original announcement, which is not claimed, in the legal logic map.

Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of an alternative legal logic map according to embodiment 1 of the present application, and in conjunction with fig. 4, the referee result includes refund payment and triple reimbursement, where a node 41 is used to indicate whether price fraud is occurring, a node 42 is used to indicate whether absolute description is available, a node 43 is used to indicate whether medical terminology is applicable, and a node 44 is used to indicate whether the original is a consumer, where the original has no absolute description to mention litigation for the advised, that is, the corresponding trial element of the node 42 is the content of the original that has not proposed litigation, and therefore, the node 42 and all the nodes upstream thereof are inactive regions (black circles are used in fig. 4), and the original proposes litigation for other determination points, and therefore, other nodes and nodes upstream thereof are active regions (white circles are used in fig. 4).

Specifically, the uncertain reasoning technology refers to a process of reasoning out a certain degree of uncertainty, but in accordance with or near reasonable conclusions, by using uncertain indications or rules based on evidence with uncertainty. When the uncertain reasoning technology is applied to the scheme, the deduced legal fact entity has certain uncertainty, but is reasonable, because the case information and the court trial records have certain uncertainty and the legal indication map has certain uncertainty.

As an alternative embodiment, in the activation area, case information is processed by using an uncertainty inference technique to obtain a referee result, including: based on the associated information and the direction information among a plurality of nodes in the legal logic map, case information and court trial records are traversed in the legal logic map, and nodes for pointing to referee results corresponding to the case information are obtained; and taking the legal fact entity pointed by the acquired node as a judgment result.

Specifically, since the association relationships (e.g., logical relationships) between a plurality of nodes in the legal logical graph have directionality, the legal logical graph can be traversed in the direction of the logical relationships according to the logical inference rules in the legal logical graph until the legal fact entity is pointed, and the pointed legal fact entity is used as the final referee result.

As an alternative embodiment, in the activation area, case information is processed by using an uncertainty inference technique to obtain a referee result, including: vectorizing each node in the legal logic map to obtain a legal logic map based on vectorization expression; on the basis of a legal logic map expressed by vectorization, randomly walking on the legal logic map on the basis of case information and court trial records, and determining a probability value corresponding to each node where the walking is to be performed; and under the condition that the probability value of the walking node is greater than the preset probability, continuously walking the next node until the node for representing the judgment result is obtained.

Optionally, traversing on the logical graph along the logical relationship direction according to a logical inference rule in the legal logical graph, calculating a probability value corresponding to each node, and comparing the probability value of the node with a preset probability value, for example, the probability value corresponding to the node 1 is 80%, the preset probability value is 90%, the probability value of the node 1 is smaller than the preset probability value, the referee inference module judges the case without using the content corresponding to the node 1, and does not traverse on the next node of the node 1. If the probability value corresponding to the node 2 is 95% and the preset probability value is 90%, and the probability value of the node 2 is greater than the preset probability value, the judging reasoning module judges the case to be judged by adopting the content corresponding to the node 2 and continuously traverses the next node of the node 2.

As an alternative embodiment, after analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain the referee result, the method further comprises: receiving feedback information of the target object aiming at the judgment result; and adjusting the judging result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

Specifically, the feedback information may be sent by the judge, the dispute focus is a risk point when the judge judges, and after the algorithm feeds back the finally obtained judge result and dispute focus to the judge through the interactive interface, the judge determines whether to determine or modify the dispute focus, and the information is the feedback information. After the officer modifies the assignment of the dispute focus, the referee result needs to be adjusted according to the dispute focus modified by the officer.

Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of an interactive interface displayed to a judge by an algorithm according to embodiment 1 of the present application, and is combined with fig. 5, where a problem point is used to indicate a risk point, i.e., a dispute focus, and an inspection point is an referee result, where there is an opinion given by the algorithm after each problem or inspection point, where a black solid circle indicates that the algorithm is recommended to be approved, a white solid circle indicates that the algorithm is recommended to be not approved, and after each problem and inspection point, there are "no" and "approved" labels for the judge to select, and the judge feeds back information to the system by selecting the "not approved" or "approved" label, and the system traverses the legal logic map again according to the information fed back by the judge to adjust the referee result.

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 1 of the present application, and in combination with fig. 6, although the original case and the informed case were submitted with the beginning of prosecution and the form of answer and evidence before the trial, in the normal situation, both parties will provide new information in the court trial stage, for example: appeal, evidence, etc. Therefore, the scheme obtains a more accurate judgment result through the algorithm by updating and complementing the information in the court trial stage.

Firstly, through information extraction/data mining, case information (which can comprise a prosecution book, an answer book and evidence) submitted before a trial is obtained, and then a legal logic map constructed in advance is obtained.

When the system judges the cases, not only the case information intersected before the court trial needs to be mapped in the legal logic map, but also the court trial records generated in the court trial process need to be analyzed and mapped in the legal logic map.

The system automatically carries out judgment reasoning based on the legal logic map according to case information and court trial records, displays a reasoning result on an interactive interface of a judge, the judge feeds back according to a dispute focus and the reasoning result displayed in the interface to show whether to accept the result of the automatic reasoning of the system, and the system adjusts the reasoning result according to the feedback information of the judge to obtain a final judgment result.

The scheme structurally extracts the disputed contents of both parties in the court trial stage, which are reported to solve the disputed problems, and maps the disputed contents on the logic map, thereby providing more accurate information for the system to carry out judgment reasoning. More specifically, element extraction and dispute focus identification are carried out according to court trial contents, the dispute focus is mapped on the logic map, and the dynamic mapping and assignment are carried out on the answer of two parties to the dispute focus and the question and answer of a judge to the original reported answer as activated nodes in the logic map.

It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the above-mentioned method embodiments are described as a series of acts or combination of acts, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited by the order of acts, as some steps may occur in other orders or concurrently in accordance with the invention. Further, those skilled in the art should also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are preferred embodiments and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required by the invention.

Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that the method according to the above embodiments can be implemented by software plus a necessary general hardware platform, and certainly can also be implemented by hardware, but the former is a better implementation mode in many cases. Based on such understanding, the technical solutions of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium (such as ROM/RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) and includes instructions for enabling a terminal device (such as a mobile phone, a computer, a server, or a network device) to execute the method according to the embodiments of the present invention.

Example 2

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining case referee results, fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 2 of the present application, and as shown in fig. 7, the method includes:

step S71, displaying case information of the case to be judged which is submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

Court trial records refer to written records reflecting the actual conditions of all trial interactions synchronously in the court trial process. The complaint information can comprise complaint information of original reports on the reports in the court trial process, and the answer information can comprise the dialect of the original reports/the reports or representative lawyers in the court trial process for answering the statement, the notice or the complaint; the source of the new evidence information is still not limited, and the new evidence information can be testimony of a new witness in the court trial process, can be provided in the court trial process of an original report or a reported report, and is different from the evidence information of the evidence information submitted before the court trial.

Step S73, analyzing and processing case information and court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following steps: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

As an alternative embodiment, after displaying the case information and the court trial records for analysis processing based on the legal logic map to obtain the referee result, the method further comprises: displaying feedback information input by the target object aiming at the judgment result; and displaying the referee result adjusted based on the feedback information.

Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of an interactive interface displayed to a judge by an algorithm according to an embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 7, a problem point is used to indicate a risk point, i.e., a dispute focus, and an inspection point is an referee result, wherein an opinion is given by the algorithm after each problem or inspection point, a black solid circle indicates that the algorithm is recommended to be approved, a white solid circle indicates that the algorithm is recommended to be not approved, a label of "not any" and "approved" is provided after each problem and inspection point for the judge to select, the judge feeds back information to the system by selecting the label of "not approved" or "approved", and the system traverses the legal logic map again according to the information fed back by the judge to adjust the referee result.

Example 3

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining case referee results, fig. 8 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 3 of the present application, and as shown in fig. 8, the method includes:

step S81, obtaining case information of the case to be judged submitted before the court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answering, and evidence information.

And step S83, analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic map to obtain an initial judgment result.

It should be noted that the composition of the legal logic map mainly includes:

Specifically, the case information is analyzed and processed based on the legal logic map to obtain the initial judgment result, or the case information is subjected to information extraction to obtain a keyword, the keyword is mapped to the legal logic map, and the initial judgment result determined according to the case information is obtained by traversing the legal logic map.

Step S85, receiving court trial records in the court trial process, wherein the court trial records comprise at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

Specifically, court trial records refer to written records that synchronously reflect the actual conditions of all trial interactions in the court trial process. The complaint information can comprise complaint information of original reports on the reports in the court trial process, and the answer information can comprise the dialect of the original reports/the reports or representative lawyers in the court trial process for answering the statement, the notice or the complaint; the source of the new evidence information is still not limited, and the new evidence information can be testimony of a new witness in the court trial process, can be provided in the court trial process of an original report or a reported report, and is different from the evidence information of the evidence information submitted before the court trial.

And step S87, analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result.

Specifically, because the court trial records record the anti-dispute contents of both parties originally reported to the dispute problem in the court trial stage, the anti-dispute contents recorded in the court trial records are structurally extracted and mapped on the legal logic map, and the mapped nodes in the logic map are assigned based on the answers of both parties to the dispute focus and the question and reply of the judge to the original reported answer, so as to obtain the anti-dispute result, namely the analysis result of the court trial records by the legal logic map.

Step S89, adjusting the initial judgment result based on the anti-dialectic result to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

Because the original notice and the defendant are likely to put forward new information in the court trial process, for example: appeal, evidence, etc., so the initial outcome can be adjusted using the dispute outcome in order to output a more accurate referee outcome. For example, the initial referee result and the anti-discriminant result are subjected to a preset logic operation, so as to obtain a final referee result.

The above embodiments of the present application obtain case information of a pending case that has been submitted before a court trial, where the case information includes at least one of: prosecution, answer, and evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic map to obtain an initial judgment result; receiving a court trial record in a court trial process, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result; adjusting the initial judgment result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates. Compared with the mode of ignoring court trial records and only using case information to determine the referee result, the scheme maps the information which is possibly changed or modified in the court trial process into the legal logic map, so that the referee result has higher accuracy.

Example 4

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method for obtaining case referee results, fig. 9 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 4 of the present application, and as shown in fig. 9, the method includes:

step S91, obtaining case information of the case to be judged submitted before the court trial and the court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

And step S93, analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result.

Step S95, analyzing the case information based on the legal logic map, and combining the dispute result to obtain a judge result, wherein the judge result is used for representing the case information and the legal fact entity obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic map, and the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

The case information is analyzed and processed based on the legal logic map, and the case information can be subjected to information extraction to obtain key words, the key words are mapped into the legal logic map, and inference results obtained according to case information inference are obtained by traversing the legal logic map.

In an optional embodiment, the discriminative information can be obtained based on the legal logic map according to the court trial record, and then reasoning is carried out according to the case information to obtain a corresponding reasoning result. And in the reasoning process, combining the dispute focus assignment with the dispute result to carry out dynamic mapping to obtain a final reasoning result.

In an optional embodiment, the discriminative information can be obtained based on the legal logic map according to the court trial record, inference is carried out according to the case information to obtain a corresponding inference result, and then the discriminative information is adjusted according to the inference result to obtain a final inference result.

The embodiments of the application acquire case information of a case to be judged which is submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process; analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result; and analyzing the case information based on the legal logic map, and combining the anti-discriminative result to obtain a referee result. Compared with the mode of ignoring court trial records and only using case information to determine the referee result, the scheme maps the information which is possibly changed or modified in the court trial process into the legal logic map, so that the referee result has higher accuracy.

Example 5

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided an apparatus for obtaining case referee results for implementing the method for obtaining case referee results in the above embodiment 1, and fig. 10 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 5 of the present application, as shown in fig. 10, the apparatus 100 includes:

the obtaining module 102 is configured to obtain case information of a to-be-refered case that has been submitted before a court trial, and a court trial record in a court trial process, where the case information includes at least one of: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

An analysis module 104, configured to analyze and process the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a referee result, where the legal logic map at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

It should be noted here that the above-mentioned obtaining module 102 and the analyzing module 104 correspond to steps S21 to S23 in embodiment 1, and the two modules are the same as the corresponding steps in the implementation example and application scenario, but are not limited to the disclosure of the above-mentioned embodiment one. It should be noted that the modules described above as part of the apparatus may be run in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

As an alternative embodiment, the analysis module comprises: the traversal submodule is used for traversing the case information and the court trial records in the legal logic map to obtain a legal fact entity as a judgment result; in the traversing process, case information and court trial records are respectively mapped to the legal logic map, and if the case information and the court trial records are successfully mapped to corresponding nodes, information used for generating a judgment result is acquired.

As an alternative embodiment, the traversing sub-module comprises: the first extraction unit is used for extracting at least one logic main point from the legal logic map based on the court trial record, wherein the logic main point corresponds to a node in the legal logic map; a second decimation unit for deriving at least one dispute focus based on at least one logical gist; the mapping unit is used for mapping each dispute focus and the context information corresponding to each dispute focus to obtain a first judgment fact from the legal logic map; and the combining unit is used for combining the second judgment fact obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment fact to generate a legal fact entity.

As an alternative embodiment, the first decimation unit comprises: the recognition subunit is used for recognizing keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record; a matching subunit, configured to match, based on the identified keyword, a node in the legal logic graph, where the node includes at least one of: name, attribute, and semantic information; and the first determining subunit is used for taking the nodes with the similarity exceeding the threshold in the matching result as the logical points.

As an alternative embodiment, the second extraction unit comprises: the system comprises a first acquisition subunit, a second acquisition subunit and a third acquisition subunit, wherein the first acquisition subunit is used for acquiring sentences containing at least one logic essential point and marking the logic essential point, and the sentences form one or more groups of conversations; and the generating subunit is used for clustering at least one logic point of the label to generate at least one dispute focus.

As an alternative embodiment, the second extracting unit further includes: the classification subunit is configured to, after clustering the at least one labeled logical key point and generating at least one dispute focus, classify all the dispute focuses to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute focuses, where each classification includes a group of dispute focuses; and the second determining subunit is used for taking the statement corresponding to each group of dispute focus as context information.

As an alternative embodiment, the mapping unit includes: the second acquiring subunit is used for acquiring statement contents of corresponding dispute focuses from the context information of each dispute focus; the mapping submodule is used for mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into the legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts; and the optimization submodule is used for carrying out global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain a first judgment fact, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining the actual judgment fact corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic map when any two or more local judgment facts conflict.

As an alternative embodiment, the combining unit comprises: the third determining subunit is used for determining the active areas of the case information and the court trial records in the legal logic map under the condition of successful mapping to the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact, wherein the successful mapping is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic map are activated, and the active areas are formed by areas where the activated nodes in the legal logic map are located; and the processing subunit is used for processing the case information and the court trial records by using an uncertainty reasoning technology in the activation area to obtain the legal fact entity as a judgment result.

As an alternative embodiment, the processing subunit comprises: the third acquiring subunit is used for recording the case information and the court trial in the legal logical map for traversal on the basis of the correlation information and the direction information among the nodes in the legal logical map, and acquiring nodes for pointing to referee results corresponding to the case information; and the fourth acquiring subunit is used for taking the legal fact entity pointed by the acquired node as a judgment result.

As an alternative embodiment, the processing subunit comprises: the vectorization processing unit carries out vectorization processing on each node in the legal logic map to obtain the legal logic map based on vectorization expression; the fourth determining subunit is used for performing random walking on the legal logic map based on case information and court trial records on the legal logic map based on vectorization expression, and determining the probability value corresponding to each walking node; and the walking subunit is used for continuously walking the next node under the condition that the probability value of the walking node is greater than the preset probability until the node used for representing the judgment result is obtained.

As an alternative embodiment, the apparatus further comprises: the receiving module is used for receiving feedback information of the target object aiming at the referee result after analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain the referee result; and the adjusting module is used for adjusting the judging result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

Example 6

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided an apparatus for obtaining case referee results for implementing the method for obtaining case referee results in embodiment 2 described above, and fig. 11 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 6 of the present application, as shown in fig. 11, the apparatus 110 includes:

the first display module 112 is configured to display case information of the to-be-refered case that has been submitted before the court trial, and court trial records in the court trial process, where the case information includes at least one of the following: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

A second display module 114, configured to display a case information and a court trial record that are analyzed and processed based on a legal logic map, so as to obtain a referee result, where the legal logic map at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

It should be noted that the first display module 112 and the second display module 114 correspond to steps S71 to S73 in embodiment 2, and the two modules are the same as the corresponding steps in the implementation example and the application scenario, but are not limited to the disclosure in the first embodiment. It should be noted that the modules described above as part of the apparatus may be run in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

As an alternative embodiment, the apparatus further comprises: the third display module is used for displaying feedback information input by the target object aiming at the referee result after the case information and the court trial record are analyzed and processed based on the legal logic map to obtain the referee result; and the fourth display module is used for displaying the judgment result adjusted based on the feedback information.

Example 7

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided an apparatus for obtaining case referee results for implementing the method for obtaining case referee results in the above embodiment 3, and fig. 12 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 7 of the present application, as shown in fig. 12, the apparatus 120 includes:

the obtaining module 122 is configured to obtain case information of the to-be-refered case that has been submitted before the court trial, where the case information includes at least one of: prosecution, answering, and evidence information.

And the processing module 124 is used for analyzing and processing the case information based on the legal logic map to obtain an initial judgment result.

A receiving module 126, configured to receive a court trial record in a court trial process, where the court trial record includes at least one of: complaint information, answer information, and new evidence information.

And the analysis module 128 is used for analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain an anti-dialect result.

An adjusting module 1210, configured to adjust an initial referee result based on the resistant result to obtain a referee result, where the legal logic map at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

It should be noted here that the acquiring module 122, the processing module 124, the receiving module 126, the analyzing module 128, and the analyzing module 128 correspond to steps S81 to S89 in embodiment 3, and the five modules are the same as the corresponding steps in the implementation example and application scenario, but are not limited to the disclosure in the first embodiment. It should be noted that the modules described above as part of the apparatus may be run in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

Example 8

According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided an apparatus for obtaining case referee results for implementing the method for obtaining case referee results in the above embodiment 4, and fig. 13 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for obtaining case referee results according to embodiment 8 of the present application, as shown in fig. 13, the apparatus 130 includes:

an obtaining module 132, configured to obtain case information of the to-be-refered case that has been submitted before the court trial, and a court trial record in the court trial process, where the case information includes at least one of: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

the processing module 134 is used for analyzing and processing the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result;

a combining module 136, configured to analyze the case information based on the legal logic map, and combine the dispute result to obtain a referee result, where the referee result is used to characterize the case information and a legal fact entity obtained by traversing the court trial record in the legal logic map, and the legal logic map at least includes: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

It should be noted that the acquiring module 132, the processing module 134 and the combining module 136 correspond to steps S91 to S95 in embodiment 4, and the five modules are the same as the corresponding steps in the implementation example and application scenario, but are not limited to the disclosure in the first embodiment. It should be noted that the modules described above as part of the apparatus may be run in the computer terminal 10 provided in the first embodiment.

Example 9

The embodiment of the invention can provide a computer terminal which can be any computer terminal device in a computer terminal group. Optionally, in this embodiment, the computer terminal may also be replaced with a terminal device such as a mobile terminal.

Optionally, in this embodiment, the computer terminal may be located in at least one network device of a plurality of network devices of a computer network.

In this embodiment, the computer terminal may execute the program code of the following steps in the vulnerability detection method of the application program: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates. .

Alternatively, fig. 14 is a block diagram of a computer terminal according to embodiment 9 of the present invention. As shown in fig. 9, the computer terminal a may include: one or more processors 902 (only one shown), memory 904, and an external device 906.

The memory may be used to store software programs and modules, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the security vulnerability detection method and apparatus in the embodiments of the present invention, and the processor executes various functional applications and data processing by operating the software programs and modules stored in the memory, that is, the above-mentioned method for detecting a system vulnerability attack is implemented. The memory may include high speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic storage devices, flash memory, or other non-volatile solid-state memory. In some examples, the memory may further include memory remotely located from the processor, and these remote memories may be connected to terminal a through a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

The processor can call the information and application program stored in the memory through the transmission device to execute the following steps: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: traversing the case information and the court trial records in a legal logic map to obtain legal fact entities serving as judgment results; in the traversing process, case information and court trial records are respectively mapped to the legal logic map, and if the case information and the court trial records are successfully mapped to corresponding nodes, information used for generating a judgment result is acquired.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: extracting at least one logic main point from the legal logic map based on the court trial record, wherein the logic main point corresponds to a node in the legal logic map; deriving at least one dispute focus based on the at least one logical gist; mapping to obtain a first judgment fact from a legal logic map based on each dispute focus and context information corresponding to each dispute focus; and combining the second judgment fact obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment fact to generate a legal fact entity.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record; and matching with nodes in the legal logic map based on the identified keywords, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following: name, attribute, and semantic information; and taking the nodes with the similarity exceeding the threshold value in the matching result as the logic points.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: obtaining sentences containing at least one logic essential point, and labeling the logic essential point, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations; and clustering at least one logic point of the label to generate at least one dispute focus.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: after clustering at least one labeled logic main point and generating at least one dispute focus, classifying all dispute focuses to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute focuses, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute focuses; and taking the statement corresponding to each group of dispute focuses as context information.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: obtaining statement content of corresponding dispute focuses from the context information of each dispute focus; mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into a legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts; and performing global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain a first judgment fact, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining the actual judgment fact corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic map when any two or more local judgment facts are in conflict.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: under the condition of successful mapping to the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact, determining an activation region of case information and court trial records in the legal logic map, wherein the successful mapping is used for representing that the nodes in the legal logic map are activated, and the activation region is formed by the region where the activated nodes in the legal logic map are located; and in the activation area, case information and court trial records are processed by using an uncertainty reasoning technology to obtain legal fact entities serving as judgment results.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: based on the associated information and the direction information among a plurality of nodes in the legal logic map, case information and court trial records are traversed in the legal logic map, and nodes for pointing to referee results corresponding to the case information are obtained; and taking the legal fact entity pointed by the acquired node as a judgment result.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: vectorizing each node in the legal logic map to obtain a legal logic map based on vectorization expression; on the basis of a legal logic map expressed by vectorization, randomly walking on the legal logic map on the basis of case information and court trial records, and determining a probability value corresponding to each node where the walking is to be performed; and under the condition that the probability value of the walking node is greater than the preset probability, continuously walking the next node until the node for representing the judgment result is obtained.

Optionally, the processor may further execute the program code of the following steps: analyzing and processing case information and court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, and then receiving feedback information of a target object aiming at the judge result; and adjusting the judging result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

The embodiment of the invention provides a method for acquiring case referee results. Compared with a mode of neglecting the court trial records and only using the case information to determine the referee result, the scheme in the application maps the information which is possibly changed or modified in the court trial process into the legal logic map, so that the referee result has higher accuracy.

It can be understood by those skilled in the art that the structure shown in fig. 14 is only an illustration, and the computer terminal may also be a terminal device such as a smart phone (e.g., an Android phone, an iOS phone, etc.), a tablet computer, a palmtop computer, a Mobile Internet Device (MID), a PAD, and the like. Fig. 14 is a diagram illustrating a structure of the electronic device. For example, the computer terminal a may also include more or fewer components (e.g., network interfaces, display devices, etc.) than shown in fig. 14, or have a different configuration than shown in fig. 14.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps in the methods of the above embodiments may be implemented by a program instructing hardware associated with the terminal device, where the program may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and the storage medium may include: flash disks, Read-Only memories (ROMs), Random Access Memories (RAMs), magnetic or optical disks, and the like.

Example 4

The embodiment of the invention also provides a storage medium. Optionally, in this embodiment, the storage medium may be configured to store the program code executed by the method for obtaining a case referee result provided in the first embodiment.

Optionally, in this embodiment, the storage medium may be located in any one of computer terminals in a computer terminal group in a computer network, or in any one of mobile terminals in a mobile terminal group.

Optionally, in this embodiment, the storage medium is configured to store program code for performing the following steps: acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the prosecution book, the answer book and the evidence information, the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information; analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judge result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.

In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.

In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology can be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only one type of division of logical functions, and there may be other divisions when actually implemented, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, units or modules, and may be in an electrical or other form.

The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.

In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.

The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic or optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.

The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and decorations can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these modifications and decorations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for obtaining case referee results is characterized by comprising the following steps:

acquiring case information of a to-be-cut case submitted before a court trial and a court trial record in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following information: the court trial record comprises a prosecution book, a debate book and evidence information, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

analyzing and processing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the case information and the court trial records based on a legal logic map to obtain a referee result comprises:

traversing the case information and the court trial records in the legal logic map to obtain legal fact entities serving as the judgment results;

and in the traversing process, mapping the case information and the court trial records to the legal logical map respectively, and if the case information and the court trial records are mapped to the corresponding nodes successfully, acquiring information for generating the judgment result.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein traversing the case information and the court trial records in the legal logic map to obtain legal fact entities as the referee results comprises:

extracting at least one logic main point from the legal logic map based on the court trial record, wherein the logic main point corresponds to a node in the legal logic map;

deriving at least one dispute focus based on the at least one logical gist;

mapping to obtain a first judgment fact from the legal logic map based on each dispute focus and context information corresponding to each dispute focus;

and combining a second judgment fact obtained by mapping the case information in the legal logic map with the first judgment fact to generate the legal fact entity.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein extracting at least one logical gist from the legal logic map based on the court trial record comprises:

identifying keywords contained in one or more sentences in the court trial record;

matching nodes in the legal logic graph based on the identified keywords, wherein the nodes comprise at least one of the following: name, attribute, and semantic information;

and taking the nodes with the similarity exceeding a threshold value in the matching result as the logic main points.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein deriving at least one dispute focus based on the at least one logical gist comprises:

obtaining sentences containing at least one logic point, and labeling the logic point, wherein the sentences form one or more groups of conversations;

and clustering the at least one marked logic main point to generate the at least one dispute focus.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein after clustering the at least one logical gist of a callout to generate the at least one dispute focus, the method further comprises:

classifying all the dispute focuses to obtain a plurality of groups of dispute focuses, wherein each classification comprises a group of dispute focuses;

and taking the statement corresponding to each group of dispute focuses as the context information.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein mapping a first decision fact from the legal logic map based on each dispute focus and context information corresponding to each dispute focus comprises:

obtaining statement content of corresponding dispute focuses from the context information of each dispute focus;

mapping the statement content corresponding to each dispute focus into the legal logic map to obtain a plurality of local judgment facts;

and performing global optimization processing based on the plurality of local judgment facts to obtain the first judgment fact, wherein the global optimization processing is used for determining the actual judgment fact corresponding to each dispute focus based on the maximization of the dependency relationship in the legal logic map when any two or more local judgment facts conflict.

8. The method of claim 3, wherein combining the second determination fact mapped by the case information in the legal logical map with the first determination fact to generate the legal fact entity comprises:

in the case of successful mapping to the first judgment fact and the second judgment fact, determining an activation region of the case information and the court trial record in the legal logic map, wherein successful mapping is used for representing that the node in the legal logic map is activated, and the activation region is formed by a region in which the activated node in the legal logic map is located;

and in the activation region, using an uncertainty reasoning technology to process the case information and the court trial record to obtain a legal fact entity serving as the judgment result.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein within the activation zone, using uncertainty inference techniques to process the case information and the trial records to obtain legal fact entities as a result of the referees, comprises:

traversing the case information and the court trial records in the legal logic map based on the associated information and the direction information among the plurality of nodes in the legal logic map to obtain nodes for pointing to referee results corresponding to the case information;

and taking the legal fact entity pointed by the acquired node as the judgment result.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein within the activation zone, using uncertainty inference techniques to process the case information and the trial records to obtain legal fact entities as a result of the referees, comprises:

vectorizing each node in the legal logic map to obtain a legal logic map based on vectorization expression;

on the basis of the legal logical map represented by vectorization, randomly walking on the legal logical map on the basis of the case information and the court trial records, and determining a probability value corresponding to each node to which the walking is to be performed;

and under the condition that the probability value of the walking node is greater than the preset probability, continuously walking the next node until the node for representing the judgment result is obtained.

11. The method of claim 9 or 10, wherein after analyzing the case information and the court trial records based on the legal logic map to obtain a referee result, the method further comprises:

receiving feedback information of the target object aiming at the judgment result;

and adjusting the judgment result of the case to be judged according to the feedback information.

12. A method for obtaining case referee results is characterized by comprising the following steps:

displaying case information of the to-be-cut case submitted before the court trial and court trial records in the court trial process, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following cases: the court trial record comprises a prosecution book, a debate book and evidence information, wherein the court trial record comprises at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

and displaying the case information and the court trial records to be analyzed and processed based on a legal logic map to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises the following components: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein after displaying the case information and the court trial record for analysis based on the legal logic map to obtain a referee result, the method further comprises:

displaying feedback information input by the target object aiming at the judgment result;

and displaying the referee result adjusted based on the feedback information.

14. A method for obtaining case referee results is characterized by comprising the following steps:

acquiring case information of a case to be judged which is submitted before a court trial, wherein the case information comprises at least one of the following: prosecution, answer, and evidence information;

analyzing and processing the case information based on a legal logic map to obtain an initial judgment result;

receiving court trial records in a court trial process, wherein the court trial records comprise at least one of the following: complaint information, answer information and new evidence information;

analyzing and processing the court trial record based on the legal logic map to obtain a dialectic result;

adjusting the initial judgment result based on the anti-dialect result to obtain a judgment result, wherein the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

15. A method for obtaining case referee results is characterized by comprising the following steps:

analyzing the case information based on the legal logic map, and obtaining a referee result by combining the anti-discriminative result, wherein the referee result is used for representing the case information and legal fact entities obtained by traversing the court trial records in the legal logic map, and the legal logic map at least comprises: a plurality of nodes, association between each node and direction information, each node being for characterizing one of: elements, decision points, and logic gates.

16. A system for obtaining case referee results, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor for providing instructions to the processor for processing the following processing steps: