CN108304386A - A kind of logic-based rule infers the method and device of legal documents court verdict - Google Patents
A kind of logic-based rule infers the method and device of legal documents court verdict Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108304386A CN108304386A CN201810178757.8A CN201810178757A CN108304386A CN 108304386 A CN108304386 A CN 108304386A CN 201810178757 A CN201810178757 A CN 201810178757A CN 108304386 A CN108304386 A CN 108304386A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- logic
- collection
- rule
- event
- court
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004821 distillation Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 48
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007115 recruitment Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002747 voluntary effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000005389 magnetism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/30—Semantic analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
- G06F16/35—Clustering; Classification
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/20—Natural language analysis
- G06F40/279—Recognition of textual entities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/182—Alternative dispute resolution
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses the method and devices that a kind of logic-based rule infers legal documents court verdict, it is related to judicial domain, the present invention extracts key content from judgement document, and by semantic cutting key content at semantic segment, outgoing event is extracted from semantic segment again, and is expressed as event elements, contextually relationship, each event elements are associated to form affair logic collection of illustrative plates, and learn logic collection of illustrative plates generation model.According to the frequency that every logic rules are won victory in a document, the weight of every rule is calculated.To new document, composed using model is generated to generate event logic chart, and according to the weight of every logic in logic collection of illustrative plates, automated reasoning goes out court verdict.The affair logic collection of illustrative plates that the present invention generates indicates the key element and internal logical relationship of case in an intuitive fashion, and the logical thinking form that judge handles a case is melted into logic rules, anticipation in advance is as a result, facilitate lawsuit both sides to assess lawsuit result, selection reconciliation mode etc..
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to judicial decision fields more particularly to a kind of logic-based rule to infer legal documents court verdict
Method and device.
Background technology
In judicial domain, after appellant submits lawsuit material, appellant wishes to the material based on submission, according to history
The judgement of similar case in material, is inferred to the result of this lawsuit.Conventional method mainly has following several：1) using crucial
Word matching carrys out case as searching class.This method search precision is low, otherwise search result is very few (to be free of the pass in history archive
Keyword, but containing synonym, near synonym) or it is excessive (Keyword Selection is improper).To the document retrieved, can only substantially push away
Break current case as a result, and cannot accurately derive court verdict from the conclusion logic of law；2) it is advised using logic
Then infer that the method for legal consequences is proved to using very limited, be only capable of doing Accurate Reasoning according to content as defined in law article, it can not
It is applicable in ever-changing legal case in reality.
A kind of method and dress of automatic judgement judgement document court verdict are proposed in Chinese patent CN106815201A
It sets.Law court assert attitude part and is identified in this method interception document, and victory or defeat is searched within the scope of preset characters and tells key
Word assert attitude by Keywords matching law court.This method only provides the identification for the result that decided a case, for not
The case of judgement is executed both without reference to meaning or without the function of predicting court verdict, and entire method is not related to the administration of justice
Keyword search is only simply utilized in logic, when variant or conflict occurs in keyword, may return to error result or nothing
As a result it returns.
Therefore, those skilled in the art is dedicated to developing a kind of logic-based rule and infers legal documents court verdict
Method and device, extracts key content from judgement document, and by semantic cutting key content at semantic segment, then from language
Outgoing event is extracted in adopted segment, and is expressed as event elements, contextually relationship, and each event elements are associated into shape
It is composed at event logic chart, and learns logic collection of illustrative plates generation model.According to the frequency that every logic rules are won victory in a document,
Calculate the weight of every rule.To new document, composed using model is generated to generate event logic chart, and according to logic collection of illustrative plates
In every logic weight, automated reasoning goes out court verdict.
Invention content
In view of the drawbacks described above of the prior art, technical problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a kind of logic-based rule
The method and device for then inferring legal documents court verdict is arrived using the knowledge in legal profession field according to history archive study
Feature, formed affair logic collection of illustrative plates, to infer the possible outcome of new law documentation, to solve in existing method only
It relies on keyword search and ignores legal profession knowledge and judicial logic, lead to not push away judicial decision in a case result
Disconnected problem.
To achieve the above object, the present invention provides the sides that a kind of logic-based rule infers legal documents court verdict
Method includes the following steps：
Step S101：Disclosed judge's text is acquired；
Step S102：The judgement document of acquisition is subjected to key content extraction, and by semantic cutting key content Chinese idiom
Adopted segment；
Step S103：Event keyword extraction, central issue extraction are carried out from semantic segment and appeal extraction, event
Including main body, action, receptor three classes, forms event elements according to the context of word and indicate；
Step S104：Contextually relationship associates each event node unit to form affair logic collection of illustrative plates；
Step S105：Based on the affair logic collection of illustrative plates that step S104 is formed, learn logic collection of illustrative plates generation model, according to
Every logic rules are directed to the frequency of winning victory of all kinds of appeals in all sample judgement documents, calculate the weight of every rule；
Step S106：It is the case relevant documentation for forming court verdict that user, which inputs pleadings, court's trial notes etc.,；
Step S107：The model generated using step S105 closes document input by user in step S106 automatically
Key contents extraction, semantic segmentation form event elements, ultimately form logic collection of illustrative plates；
Step S108：According to the weight of every logic in logic collection of illustrative plates, automated reasoning goes out court verdict.
Further, the key content extraction refers to automatically identifying the viewpoint of law court to collected judgement document
The key contents such as the evidence accepted and believed, and ignore the statement part of both sides in case Concrete facts, automatically using law court
Standard form and keyword draw a circle to approve core content.
Further, the semantic cutting refers to the core content that will be extracted, and is split according to different grain size, point
The benchmark cut is to make pauses in reading unpunctuated ancient writings naturally according to branch, fullstop etc. or the Semantic center of sentence paragraph, the text fragments after segmentation
Different semantic clusters is constituted, is divided using method of the artificial mark in conjunction with text cluster.
Further, the event keyword extraction refers to the text cluster that will have been concluded, combination algorithm cluster, Yi Jifa
Keyword in allusion quotation carries out artificial conclude and merges.
Further, the central issue extraction refers to law court's viewpoint part described in judgement document, quotes correlation method
Law item carries out semantic point come the judgement key element for summarizing case and existing central issue, by cited law law article
Analysis, extracts the central issue of case.
Further, it refers to the court decision result part described in judgement document that the case, which appeals extraction, identifies table
Show the keyword of court verdict, and traces back to extract corresponding appeal above accordingly.
Further, event elements expression refers to that outgoing event is extracted from text cluster, the element of event be divided into main body,
Action, receptor three classes are expressed as triple (main body, action, receptor) according to the context of word, form event elements.
Further, event node unit association refers to the contextually causality in text cluster, will be each
A event elements associate to form logic rules, and the identical node merging of each logic rules then generates affair logic collection of illustrative plates,
And take out generation model.
Further, the computational methods of the weight of the logic are：For a certain rule, its weight definition is text
Quantity containing the rule and the number of documents won a lawsuit, divided by all documents containing the rule in shelves set, that is, " victory
Just claim weight ".
The present invention provides the devices that a kind of logic-based rule infers legal documents court verdict, including data acquisition module
Block, text cutting module, central issue, appeal and Event Distillation module, logic collection of illustrative plates generation module, reasoning from logic module；
The core content of the data acquisition module identification document, and extract；
The content of extraction is split by the text cutting module by the methods of punctuate, semanteme naturally；
The central issue, appeal and Event Distillation module are by sentence segment, sentence, the profession in paragraph after segmentation
Field centre word extracts, by centre word classify based on, action, object etc., and constitute minimum semantic primitive；
The logic collection of illustrative plates generation module sets up logical relation according to the context causality between each semantic primitive
Figure all establishes every document true logic relation picture；
The reasoning from logic module calculates the weight of every logical relation by the frequency occurred in collection of document,
For new law documentation, logic rules set is automatically generated, and every is assigned according to the weight for learning out in collection of document
The corresponding weight of rule, infers the result of case using reasoning from logic network algorithm and weight later.
Logic-based rule proposed by the present invention infers that the method for legal documents court verdict has fully considered legal case
Internal relation and professional knowledge, the affair logic collection of illustrative plates of generation indicates case with a kind of compression but intuitive way
Most critical element and internal logical relationship, and the logical thinking form that judge is handled a case is melted into logic rules, anticipation in advance is tied
Fruit facilitates lawsuit both sides to assess lawsuit result, selection reconciliation mode etc..
The technique effect of the design of the present invention, concrete structure and generation is described further below with reference to attached drawing, with
It is fully understood from the purpose of the present invention, feature and effect.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the method schematic diagram of the preferred embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 2 is the apparatus structure schematic diagram of the preferred embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 3 is the logic collection of illustrative plates schematic diagram of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Specific implementation mode
Multiple preferred embodiments that the present invention is introduced below with reference to Figure of description, keep its technology contents more clear and just
In understanding.The present invention can be emerged from by many various forms of embodiments, and protection scope of the present invention not only limits
The embodiment that Yu Wenzhong is mentioned.
In the accompanying drawings, the identical component of structure is indicated with same numbers label, everywhere the similar component of structure or function with
Like numeral label indicates.The size and thickness of each component shown in the drawings are to be arbitrarily shown, and there is no limit by the present invention
The size and thickness of each component.In order to keep diagram apparent, some places suitably exaggerate the thickness of component in attached drawing.
As shown in Figure 1, logic-based rule infers that legal documents court verdict method includes the following steps：
Step S101：Disclosed judge's text is acquired.
Step S102：The judgement document of acquisition is subjected to key content extraction, and by semantic cutting key content Chinese idiom
Adopted segment.
Step S103：Extract outgoing event, central issue and appeal from semantic segment, event include main body, action, by
Body three classes are expressed as event elements according to the context of word.
Step S104：Contextually relationship associates each event elements to form affair logic collection of illustrative plates.
Step S105：Based on the affair logic collection of illustrative plates that step S104 is formed, learn logic collection of illustrative plates generation model, according to
Every logic rules are directed to the frequency of winning victory of all kinds of appeals in all sample judgement documents, calculate the weight of every rule.
Step S106：It is the case relevant documentation for forming court verdict that user, which inputs pleadings, court's trial notes etc.,.
Step S107：The model that S106 documents input by user are generated using S105, automatic progress key content extraction,
Semantic segmentation forms event elements, ultimately forms logic collection of illustrative plates.
Step S108：According to the weight of every logic in logic collection of illustrative plates, automated reasoning goes out court verdict.
Wherein, key content extracting method is as follows：
To collected judgement document, the viewpoint of law court is automatically identified and the key contents such as the evidence accepted and believed, suddenly
The statement part of both sides slightly in case Concrete facts.Automatically relevant core is drawn a circle to approve using the standard form of law court and keyword
Intracardiac appearance.
Semantic cutting method is as follows：
The core content that previous step is extracted, is split, the benchmark of segmentation is according to branch, sentence according to different grain size
The Semantic center of number equal natures punctuate or sentence paragraph, the text fragments after segmentation constitute different semantic clusters.It uses
It is artificial to mark the method in conjunction with text cluster to divide.
Keyword extracting method is as follows：
The text cluster that previous step is concluded, it is artificial to conclude simultaneously, and the keyword in combination algorithm cluster and code.
Central issue extracting method is as follows：
Law court's viewpoint part described in judgement document, it will usually quote relevant law law article and be closed to summarize the judgement of case
Law law article cited herein is carried out semantic analysis by key element and existing central issue, and the dispute for extracting case is burnt
Point.
Case appeals extracting method as follows：
The court decision result part described in judgement document, identification indicate the keyword of court verdict, such as " give really
Recognize ", " unassisted ", " rejection " etc., and trace back to extract corresponding appeal above accordingly.
Event elements representation method is as follows：
Outgoing event is extracted from text cluster, the element of event is divided into main body, action, receptor three classes, according to the front and back pass of word
System is expressed as triple (main body, action, receptor), forms event elements.
Event node unit relationship and generation method are as follows：
In text cluster, contextually causality, each event elements is associated to form logic rules, respectively
The identical node merging of a logic rules then generates affair logic collection of illustrative plates, and takes out generation model.
Logic rules weighing computation method is as follows：
For a certain rule, its weight definition is in collection of document containing the rule and the number of documents won a lawsuit,
Divided by the quantity of all documents containing the rule, that is, " weight of winning a lawsuit ".
The logic rules inference method of document is as follows：
To new document, each logic rules are generated using model is generated, assign weight, and be connected to become affair logic
Collection of illustrative plates.Using inference technologies such as Markov Logic Networks, the result of entire logic collection of illustrative plates is inferred.
As shown in Fig. 2, the present invention provides the device that a kind of logic-based rule infers legal documents court verdict, packet
Include data acquisition module, text cutting module, central issue, appeal and Event Distillation module, logic collection of illustrative plates generation module patrols
Collect reasoning module；
Data acquisition module identifies the core content of document, and extracts；Text cutting module presses the content of extraction
Naturally the methods of punctuate, semanteme are split；Central issue, appeal and Event Distillation module are by the sentence segment after segmentation, sentence
Son, the professional domain centre word in paragraph extract, by centre word classify based on, action, object etc., and constitute minimum
Semantic primitive；Logic collection of illustrative plates generation module sets up logical relation according to the context causality between each semantic primitive
Figure all establishes every document true logic relation picture；The weight of every logical relation is passed through document sets by reasoning from logic module
The frequency occurred in conjunction is calculated, and for new law documentation, automatically generates logic rules set, and according to collection of document
The weight of middle study out is assigned per the corresponding weight of rule, is inferred later using reasoning from logic network algorithm and weight
The result of case.
With reference to specific example, the present invention is further explained.
With《Yuan XX and other labour dispute first sentence papers of civil judgment of Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd》[Reference Number：
(2017) 0105 people of Shanghai just No. 8382] it is specific embodiment, the text is as follows for document：
Plaintiff：Yuan XX, female, on April 12nd, 1979 are born, Han nationality, firmly Xuhui District of Shanghai.
Defendant：Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd, residence ground Shanghai City Chongming area.
Legal representative：Open XX, general manager.
Proceedings with a reference agent：Money XX, female.
Proceedings with a reference agent：Lee XX, Shanghai XX lawyer's offices lawyer.
Plaintiff Yuan XX tells other labour dispute a cases of defendant Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd, and the court is in April, 2017
After 26 put on record, apply through both parties, be applicable in summary procedure in accordance with the law, trial, July 14 in 2017 are appointed by judge's Lou XX
Day opens a court session to be tried.Plaintiff Yuan XX, proceedings with a reference agent Lee XX of defendant Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd
It presents in court third party claim.Termination has been tried in this case.
Plaintiff Yuan XX proposes claims to the court, it is desirable that the plaintiff that makes a binding court decision on civil or economic cases does not undertake payment defendant's violation competitive restriction and disobeys
The obligation of about golden 50,000 yuan of RMB.True and reason：Plaintiff serves as hiring manager on January 28th, 2016 registration defendant
Position, both sides sign the labour contract in time limit on January 27th, 2019, and agreement monthly base pay is 3,000 yuan, performance pay
5,000 yuan, 15,000 yuan of post (post) subsidy, 1,900 yuan of housing allowance maintains secrecy and takes 100 yuan.Both sides separately sign《Competing industry limit
Agreement processed》, agreement competitive restriction is voluntary, and defendant is pressed by 30% standard of the basic wage of the last one on-job month of plaintiff
Moon payment plaintiff's competitive restriction compensation payment；Once defendant does not press about orientation plaintiff and pays compensation payment, that is, show that defendant has exempted original
Corresponding competitive restriction obligation is accused, defendant no longer needs to row and the such exemption of plaintiff, defendant is notified not to be able to any shape in any form
Formula (including but not limited to arbitration or lawsuit) requires plaintiff to pay unpaid compensation payment.On August 26th, 2016, plaintiff is from defendant
It leaves office at place.Defendant does not inform that plaintiff fulfils competitive restriction obligation when leaving office, and defendant does not also press both sides after in August, 2016
Promissory payment plaintiff's competitive restriction compensation payment, plaintiff have reason to believe it without undertaking corresponding competitive restriction obligation, therefore different
Meaning payment violates 50,000 yuan of competitive restriction penalty.Law court is asked to support the claims of plaintiff.
Plaintiff is to prove its statement, and following evidence material is provided to the court：
1, labour contract.It is intended to prove bipartite labor relation.
2, confidentiality agreement.It is intended to prove bipartite secrecy agreement.
3, competitive restriction agreement.It is intended to prove the competitive restriction agreement of both sides.
Defendant is without demur to the authenticity of above-mentioned evidence, but does not confirm fact to be proved.
Defendant Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd argues that plaintiff enters on January 28th, 2016 at defendant, serves as people
Power Resources Department hiring manager.Both sides sign the labour contract stopped time limit on January 27th, 2019, another to sign《Competitive restriction is assisted
View》If agreement plaintiff violates the obligation of the competitive restriction under this agreement item, should be liable for breach of contract, to defendant's payment of breach of contract damages
50,000 yuan.On August 26th, 2016, plaintiff resign.Secondary month, plaintiff was i.e. to there are the enterprise of direct competitive relationship loads with defendant
Thing of leting people management position, the behavior violate competitive restriction obligation, and plaintiff should pay defendant's competitive restriction according to protocol conventions and disobey
About 50,000 yuan of gold.Defendant obeys arbitral award, and the claims of plaintiff are rejected by request law court.
Defendant is to prove its statement, and following evidence material is provided to the court：
1, labour contract.It is intended to prove the labor relation situation of both sides, wherein about competitive restriction arranging with both sides separately
It signs《Competitive restriction agreement》Subject to.
2, competitive restriction agreement.It is intended to prove the competitive restriction obligation of plaintiff and liability for breach of contract.
3, notice of meeting and daily recruitment relevant e-mail.It is intended to prove the senior executive of plaintiff system defendant and bear
The personnel for having confidentiality obligations belong to legal competitive restriction personnel.
4, leaving office proves.It is intended to prove that both sides severed labor relations on the 26th in August in 2016.
5, " supremo 1 is to 1 " webpage.It is intended to prove that " supremo 1 is to 1 " of defendant's operation is that be engaged in middle and primary schools one-to-one online
The teaching platform of guidance.
6, " Onlly classroom " webpage notarization, website record information, project presentation notarization.It is intended to prove plaintiff
Most it is later than the Onlly classroom that the registration on the 31st of August in 2016 has competitive relation with defendant, violates competitive restriction obligation.
7, industrial and commercial registration information.It is intended to prove the business scope of Onlly classroom sponsor.
8, lawyer's letter.It is intended to prove that defendant sends lawyer's letter to plaintiff on November 11st, 2016 and it is reminded to fulfil competing industry
The fact for limiting obligation.
9, record is delivered.It is intended to prove that plaintiff signed for lawyer's letter on November 12nd, 2016, but does not make any time
It is multiple.
The authenticity of the above-mentioned evidence of plaintiff is without demur, but does not confirm fact to be proved.
For the consentient evidence material of plaintiff and defendant, the court is assert.
Assert through trial true as follows in the court：Plaintiff serves as Human Resource Department on January 28th, 2016 registration defendant
Hiring manager, the work such as responsible person's recruitment and interview.Both sides sign the time limit as on January 27,28 days to 2019 January in 2016
Labour contract, agreement monthly base pay be 3,000 yuan, 5,000 yuan of performance pay, 15,000 yuan of post (post) subsidy, firmly
Room subsidizes 1,900 yuan, and secrecy takes 100 yuan.Both sides in signing on the same day《Confidentiality agreement》And《Competitive restriction agreement》,《Competitive restriction
Agreement》5.1st article of agreement, plaintiff is same to be intended in the labour contract time limit, and 2 years from leaving office, was not obtaining defendant in advance
In the case of written consent or written confirmation, plaintiff will not serve as same defendant's business and form competitive relation or have similar traffic
Shareholder, partner, employee, consultant, administrative staff, director, manager, agent, partner, the investor of entity etc.；With quilt
Accuse form competitive relation or have the scope of business of similar traffic include but not limited to K12 online educations exploitation and service operation,
The exploitation etc. of related online education software and hardware；With defendant formed competitive relation or have the enterprise of similar traffic refer to be engaged in it is above-mentioned competing
Strive the enterprise of business；5.4th article of agreement, defendant monthly provide compensation payment to competitive restriction after plaintiff leaves office and expire, monthly send out
The compensation goldstandard put is the 30% of the basic wage of the last one on-job month of plaintiff；5.5th article of agreement：In competitive restriction
In phase, once defendant, which does not press 5.4 treaty of this agreement orientation plaintiff, pays compensation payment, that is, it is corresponding to show that defendant has exempted plaintiff
Competitive restriction is voluntary, and defendant no longer needs to go that the such exemption of plaintiff, plaintiff is notified not to be able to any in any way under such situation
Mode (including but not limited to arbitration or lawsuit) requires defendant to pay unpaid compensation payment.Both sides simultaneously arrange the competing industry of plaintiff's violation
Limitation obligation, it should be liable for breach of contract, to 50000 yuan of defendant's payment of breach of contract damages.
In mid-August, 2016, because personal reason application is left office, both sides' labor relation solved plaintiff on the 26th in August in 2016
It removes.Secondary month, plaintiff entered the work of Onlly education group, " Onlly classroom " division department's management work of human resource is served as, by upper
Extra large Onlly intelligence cube educational training Co., Ltd pays social insurance premiums for it.
On November 11st, 2016, defendant send lawyer's letter by being presented to plaintiff soon, remind plaintiff should be according to after leaving office
Protocol conventions to defendant fulfil confidentiality obligations and competitive restriction obligation, and require plaintiff in receive in 3 working days of lawyer's letter from
Onlly classroom is left office, and provides related proof of leaving office to defendant.Plaintiff has signed for the lawyer's letter in next day, but does not give reply.
Defendant did not paid competitive restriction compensation payment to plaintiff.
According to the related web site information that defendant provides, " supremo 1 is to 1 " system is engaged in middle and primary schools online one by what defendant runed
The teaching platform taught one." Onlly classroom " is taught by Shanghai Onlly intelligence cube educational training Co., Ltd and Shanghai Onlly
It educates training Co., Ltd to sponsor, is the authoritative teaching platform of the one-to-one Web-based instruction service of absorbed middle and primary schools.August 31 in 2016
Day, project presentation is held in Onlly classroom, fastens first K12 online teaching item that extra large Onlly education group formally invests
Mesh publishes the front photochrome for having plaintiff in the project presentation related web site news.
On November 23rd, 2016, defendant propose request for arbitration to Changning district, Shanghai labor and personnel dispute arbitration commission,
It is required that plaintiff continues to fulfil competitive restriction obligation, and pays and violate 500,000 yuan of competitive restriction penalty.Committee ruling plaintiff
It should continue to fulfil competitive restriction obligation, and pay defendant and violate 50,000 yuan of competitive restriction penalty, remaining request to defendant
Support is not given.Plaintiff refuses to obey arbitral award, appeals to the court.
In trial, since plaintiff and defendant cause much controversies to the fact, cause this case that can not reconcile.
Think that the central issue of this case is whether plaintiff violates competitive restriction agreement in the court.Legal provisions, labourer disobey
Anti- competitive restriction agreement, it should be according to about orientation employing unit payment of breach of contract damages.Plaintiff endorsed competitive restriction association with defendant
View should fulfil competitive restriction obligation.Plaintiff's time month i.e. registration and enterprise of the defendant with horizontal competition relationship after leaving office,
Violate both sides' signing《Competitive restriction agreement》.Defendant indicates that since plaintiff leaves office secondary month be to violate competitive restriction agreement,
Therefore its company does not pay the counterplea opinion of competitive restriction compensation payment, the fact that found out with this case, is consistent, which has reasonable
Property, the court is adopted.Plaintiff does not pay competitive restriction compensation payment with defendant and serves as reasons, and advocates that defendant has exempted its competing industry
Limitation obligation, has no real basis, and the court not adopts.To sum up, there is the behavior for violating competitive restriction in plaintiff, should be according to
Both sides' agreement is liable for breach of contract, and the not abnormal height of penalty of both sides' agreement, the court is no longer adjusted.Plaintiff requires not hold
The claims that payment defendant violates 50,000 yuan of competitive restriction penalty are carried on a shoulder pole, true and legal basis is lacked, the court refuses branch
It holds.Foundation《People's Republic of China's Labor Contract Law》Article 23 second item,《The Supreme People's Court works about trial
The explanation (four) of Disputed case applicable law some problem》The regulation of Article 7, judgement are as follows：
One, the claims of plaintiff Yuan XX are rejected；
Two, plaintiff Yuan XX should continue to fulfil and defendant Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd in this judgement effective date
It signs《Competitive restriction agreement》；
Three, plaintiff Yuan XX should pay defendant Shanghai XX network technology Co., Ltd in this judgement effective date in seven days
Violate 50,000 yuan of competitive restriction agreement penalty RMB.
If not by this judgement it is specified during fulfil payment money obligation, should be according to《The People's Republic of China (PRC) is civil
The law of legal procedure》229th article of regulation doubles the debt interest during delays in payment is fulfiled.
Legitimation fee RMB 10 yuan halves because this case is applicable in summary procedure trial and collects 5 yuan of RMB of meter, by original
Accuse Yuan's XX burdens.
Such as refuse to obey this judgement, petition for appeal can be submitted to the court, and press other side from court verdict is sent in 15 days
The number of party proposes copy, appeals in Shanghai City First Intermediate People's Court.
Court verdict original text terminates.
Semantic segment cutting is carried out to court verdict, logic rules generate and the result such as following table of the weight of logic rules：
Following table is that the inference rule of the present invention generates example：
For the above case, it is 0.12 that appeal rate of winning a lawsuit, which is calculated, in the weight adduction based on every logic rules.
As shown in figure 3, being the logic collection of illustrative plates schematic diagram of the present embodiment, content is judge's text in one row box of left side in figure
The event elements that are extracted in book and its between logical relation, intermediate box content is the central issue of this case and each event
Logical relation between unit, right side box are the appeal of this case, and final appeal supports situation according to each event elements needle
The probability adduction of getting the upper hand of of this appeal is obtained.
It should be understood by those skilled in the art that, embodiments herein can be provided as method, system or computer journey
Sequence product.Therefore, complete hardware embodiment, complete software embodiment or combining software and hardware aspects can be used in the application
The form of embodiment.Moreover, the application can be used in one or more wherein include computer usable program code calculating
The computer program implemented in machine usable storage medium (including but not limited to magnetic disk storage, CD-ROM, optical memory etc.)
The form of product.
The application is with reference to method, the flow of equipment (system) and computer program product according to the embodiment of the present application
Figure and/or block diagram describe.It should be understood that can be realized by computer program instructions each in flowchart and/or the block diagram
The combination of flow and/or box in flow and/or box and flowchart and/or the block diagram.These computers can be provided
Processor of the program instruction to all-purpose computer, special purpose computer, Embedded Processor or other programmable data processing devices
To generate a machine so that the instruction executed by computer or the processor of other programmable data processing devices generates
For realizing the function of being specified in one flow of flow chart or multiple flows and/or one box of block diagram or multiple boxes
Device.
These computer program instructions, which may also be stored in, can guide computer or other programmable data processing devices with spy
Determine in the computer-readable memory that mode works so that instruction stored in the computer readable memory, which generates, includes
The manufacture of command device, the command device are realized in one flow of flow chart or multiple flows and/or one box of block diagram
Or the function of being specified in multiple boxes.
These computer program instructions also can be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that count
Series of operation steps are executed on calculation machine or other programmable devices to generate computer implemented processing, in computer
Or the instruction executed on other programmable devices is provided for realizing in one flow of flow chart or multiple flows and/or box
The step of function of being specified in one box of figure or multiple boxes.
In a typical configuration, computing device include one or more processors (CPU), input/output interface,
Network interface and memory.
Memory may include computer-readable medium in volatile memory, random access memory (RAM) and/
Or the forms such as Nonvolatile memory, such as read-only memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM).Memory is computer-readable Jie
The example of matter.
Computer-readable medium includes permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media can be by any method
Or technology realizes information storage.Information can be computer-readable instruction, data structure, the module of program or other data.
The example of the storage medium of computer include, but are not limited to phase transition internal memory (PRAM), static RAM (SRAM),
Dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other kinds of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electricity can
Erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) (EEPROM), fast flash memory bank or other memory techniques, read-only disc read only memory (CD-ROM) (CD-
ROM), digital versatile disc (DVD) or other optical storages, magnetic tape cassette, tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetism are deposited
Equipment or any other non-transmission medium are stored up, can be used for storage and can be accessed by a computing device information.According to boundary herein
Fixed, computer-readable medium does not include temporary computer readable media (transitory media), such as the data-signal of modulation and
Carrier wave.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described in detail above.It should be appreciated that the ordinary skill of this field is without wound
The property made labour, which according to the present invention can conceive, makes many modifications and variations.Therefore, all technician in the art
Pass through the available skill of logical analysis, reasoning, or a limited experiment on the basis of existing technology under this invention's idea
Art scheme, all should be in the protection domain being defined in the patent claims.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of method that logic-based rule infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that include the following steps：
Step S101：Disclosed judge's text is acquired；
Step S102：The judgement document of acquisition is subjected to key content extraction, and by semantic cutting key content at semantic piece
Section；
Step S103：Event keyword extraction, central issue extraction are carried out from semantic segment and appeals extraction, and event includes master
Body, action, receptor three classes form event elements according to the context of word and indicate；
Step S104：Contextually relationship associates each event node unit to form affair logic collection of illustrative plates；
Step S105：Based on the affair logic collection of illustrative plates that step S104 is formed, learns logic collection of illustrative plates generation model, be patrolled according to every
The frequency of winning victory that rule is directed to all kinds of appeals in all sample judgement documents is collected, the weight of every rule is calculated；
Step S106：It is the case relevant documentation for forming court verdict that user, which inputs pleadings, court's trial notes etc.,；
Step S107：The model generated using step S105 carries out key content automatically to document input by user in step S106
Extraction, semantic segmentation form event elements, ultimately form logic collection of illustrative plates；
Step S108：According to the weight of every logic in logic collection of illustrative plates, automated reasoning goes out court verdict.
2. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that the pass
Key contents extraction refers in the key such as evidence for automatically identifying the viewpoint of law court to collected judgement document and having accepted and believed
Hold, and ignore the statement part of both sides in case Concrete facts, draws a circle to approve core using the standard form of law court and keyword automatically
Intracardiac appearance.
3. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that institute's predicate
Justice cutting refers to the core content that will be extracted, and is split according to different grain size, the benchmark of segmentation is according to branch, fullstop etc.
Naturally the Semantic center of punctuate or sentence paragraph, the text fragments after segmentation constitute different semantic clusters, use artificial mark
The method in conjunction with text cluster is noted to divide.
4. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that the thing
Part keyword extraction refers to the text cluster that will have been concluded, and the keyword in combination algorithm cluster and code is manually concluded
Merge.
5. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that described to strive
It refers to law court's viewpoint part described in judgement document to discuss focus extraction, and reference relevant law law article is closed to summarize the judgement of case
Cited law law article is carried out semantic analysis, extracts the central issue of case by key element and existing central issue.
6. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that the case
It refers to the court decision result part described in judgement document that part, which appeals extraction, the keyword of identification expression court verdict, and according to
This is traced back to extracts corresponding appeal above.
7. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that the thing
The expression of part unit refers to that outgoing event is extracted from text cluster, and the element of event is divided into main body, action, receptor three classes, according to word
Context is expressed as triple (main body, action, receptor), forms event elements.
8. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that the thing
The association of part node unit refers in text cluster, and contextually causality, each event elements are associated to be formed and are patrolled
Volume rule, the identical node merging of each logic rules then generates affair logic collection of illustrative plates, and takes out generation model.
9. the method that logic-based rule as described in claim 1 infers legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that described to patrol
Volume the computational methods of weight be：For a certain rule, its weight definition is to contain the rule in collection of document and win
The number of documents told, divided by all documents containing the rule quantity, that is, " weight of winning a lawsuit ".
10. a kind of logic-based rule infers the device of legal documents court verdict, which is characterized in that including data acquisition module
Block, text cutting module, central issue, appeal and Event Distillation module, logic collection of illustrative plates generation module, reasoning from logic module；
The core content of the data acquisition module identification document, and extract；
The content of extraction is split by the text cutting module by the methods of punctuate, semanteme naturally；
The central issue, appeal and Event Distillation module by after segmentation sentence segment, sentence, in the professional domain in paragraph
Heart word extracts, by centre word classify based on, action, object etc., and constitute minimum semantic primitive；
The logic collection of illustrative plates generation module sets up logic relation picture according to the context causality between each semantic primitive, right
Every document all establishes true logic relation picture；
The reasoning from logic module calculates the weight of every logical relation by the frequency occurred in collection of document, for
New law documentation automatically generates logic rules set, and is assigned per rule according to the weight for learning out in collection of document
Corresponding weight infers the result of case using reasoning from logic network algorithm and weight later.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810178757.8A CN108304386A (en) | 2018-03-05 | 2018-03-05 | A kind of logic-based rule infers the method and device of legal documents court verdict |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810178757.8A CN108304386A (en) | 2018-03-05 | 2018-03-05 | A kind of logic-based rule infers the method and device of legal documents court verdict |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108304386A true CN108304386A (en) | 2018-07-20 |
Family
ID=62849114
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810178757.8A Pending CN108304386A (en) | 2018-03-05 | 2018-03-05 | A kind of logic-based rule infers the method and device of legal documents court verdict |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108304386A (en) |
Cited By (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109359175A (en) * | 2018-09-07 | 2019-02-19 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic device, the method for lawsuit data processing and storage medium |
| CN109409625A (en) * | 2018-08-16 | 2019-03-01 | 上海绿狮智能信息科技股份有限公司 | The method that a kind of pair of legal affairs carries out quantitative evaluation |
| CN109472724A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-03-15 | 深圳萨摩耶互联网金融服务有限公司 | Automatic generation method and system, the electronic equipment of charging document |
| CN109815467A (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2019-05-28 | 广州恒巨信息科技有限公司 | A kind of Judicial mediation document intelligent generation method, system and device |
| CN109919368A (en) * | 2019-02-26 | 2019-06-21 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of law article recommendation forecasting system and method based on associated diagram |
| CN110175605A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-27 | 北京市律典通科技有限公司 | Electronics trial data processing method and device based on element formula |
| CN110232447A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-09-13 | 杭州实在智能科技有限公司 | Legal case depth reasoning method |
| CN110377759A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-25 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Event relation map construction method and device |
| CN110825880A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2020-02-21 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Case winning rate determining method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
| CN110837562A (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2020-02-25 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Case processing method, device and system |
| CN110858353A (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2020-03-03 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and system for obtaining case referee result |
| CN110889502A (en) * | 2019-10-15 | 2020-03-17 | 东南大学 | Deep learning-based dispute focus generation method |
| CN110929039A (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2020-03-27 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Data processing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN110955760A (en) * | 2018-09-26 | 2020-04-03 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Evaluation method of judgment result and related device |
| CN111291548A (en) * | 2020-02-12 | 2020-06-16 | 中科鼎富（北京）科技发展有限公司 | Method and device for acquiring information from court documents |
| CN111367879A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2020-07-03 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Legal document processing method and device |
| CN111538832A (en) * | 2019-02-02 | 2020-08-14 | 富士通株式会社 | Apparatus and method for event annotation of document and recording medium |
| CN111797230A (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2020-10-20 | 南京擎盾信息科技有限公司 | Legal three-layer theory automatic reasoning method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN111798344A (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2020-10-20 | 北京金堤科技有限公司 | Method and device for determining subject name, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN111898361A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2020-11-06 | 南京擎盾信息科技有限公司 | Legal text parsing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112199466A (en) * | 2020-09-08 | 2021-01-08 | 深圳价值在线信息科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for identifying associated regulation of mail |
| CN112307726A (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-02-02 | 浙江大学 | Automatic court opinion generation method guided by causal deviation removal model |
| CN112329891A (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2021-02-05 | 浙江大学 | Auxiliary case decision method, device and medium combining bidirectional attention and case decision logic |
| WO2021051866A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2021-03-25 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and apparatus for determining case judgment result, device, and computer-readable storage medium |
| WO2021057202A1 (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2021-04-01 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Method and apparatus for processing judgement result |
| CN112988957A (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2021-06-18 | 共道网络科技有限公司 | Case pre-judgment result generation method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN113010684A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-06-22 | 北京法意科技有限公司 | Construction method and system of civil complaint and judgment map |
| CN113535871A (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2021-10-22 | 杨粤湘 | Vehicle destination prediction method, device, equipment and medium based on travel map |
| CN117273008A (en) * | 2023-08-30 | 2023-12-22 | 北京华夏电通科技股份有限公司 | Referee document generation method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN117349388A (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-01-05 | 南京智绘星图信息科技有限公司 | Data timeliness determination method and electronic equipment |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103500208A (en) * | 2013-09-30 | 2014-01-08 | 中国科学院自动化研究所 | Deep layer data processing method and system combined with knowledge base |
| CN106296495A (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2017-01-04 | 点击律(上海)网络科技有限公司 | The Forecasting Methodology of a kind of lawsuit result and system |
| CN106610932A (en) * | 2015-10-27 | 2017-05-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Corpus processing method and device and corpus analyzing method and device |
| CN106991092A (en) * | 2016-01-20 | 2017-07-28 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | The method and apparatus that similar judgement document is excavated based on big data |
| US20170308795A1 (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2017-10-26 | FiscalNote, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a virtual whipboard |
| CN107330820A (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2017-11-07 | 北京智诚律法科技有限公司 | A kind of forecasting system and method for lawsuit result |
| CN107577785A (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2018-01-12 | 南京大学 | A kind of level multi-tag sorting technique suitable for law identification |
-
2018
- 2018-03-05 CN CN201810178757.8A patent/CN108304386A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103500208A (en) * | 2013-09-30 | 2014-01-08 | 中国科学院自动化研究所 | Deep layer data processing method and system combined with knowledge base |
| CN106610932A (en) * | 2015-10-27 | 2017-05-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Corpus processing method and device and corpus analyzing method and device |
| CN106991092A (en) * | 2016-01-20 | 2017-07-28 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | The method and apparatus that similar judgement document is excavated based on big data |
| US20170308795A1 (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2017-10-26 | FiscalNote, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a virtual whipboard |
| CN106296495A (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2017-01-04 | 点击律(上海)网络科技有限公司 | The Forecasting Methodology of a kind of lawsuit result and system |
| CN107330820A (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2017-11-07 | 北京智诚律法科技有限公司 | A kind of forecasting system and method for lawsuit result |
| CN107577785A (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2018-01-12 | 南京大学 | A kind of level multi-tag sorting technique suitable for law identification |
Cited By (51)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109409625A (en) * | 2018-08-16 | 2019-03-01 | 上海绿狮智能信息科技股份有限公司 | The method that a kind of pair of legal affairs carries out quantitative evaluation |
| CN109409625B (en) * | 2018-08-16 | 2021-09-14 | 上海绿狮智能信息科技股份有限公司 | Method for quantitatively evaluating legal affairs |
| CN110837562B (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2023-05-02 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Case processing method, device and system |
| CN110837562A (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2020-02-25 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Case processing method, device and system |
| CN110858353A (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2020-03-03 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and system for obtaining case referee result |
| CN110858353B (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2023-05-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and system for obtaining case judge result |
| CN109359175A (en) * | 2018-09-07 | 2019-02-19 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic device, the method for lawsuit data processing and storage medium |
| CN109359175B (en) * | 2018-09-07 | 2023-04-07 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic device, litigation data processing method, and storage medium |
| CN110955760A (en) * | 2018-09-26 | 2020-04-03 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Evaluation method of judgment result and related device |
| CN110955760B (en) * | 2018-09-26 | 2023-07-04 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Evaluation method of judgment result and related device |
| CN109472724A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-03-15 | 深圳萨摩耶互联网金融服务有限公司 | Automatic generation method and system, the electronic equipment of charging document |
| CN109815467A (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2019-05-28 | 广州恒巨信息科技有限公司 | A kind of Judicial mediation document intelligent generation method, system and device |
| CN111367879A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2020-07-03 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Legal document processing method and device |
| CN111538832A (en) * | 2019-02-02 | 2020-08-14 | 富士通株式会社 | Apparatus and method for event annotation of document and recording medium |
| CN109919368B (en) * | 2019-02-26 | 2020-11-17 | 西安交通大学 | Law recommendation prediction system and method based on association graph |
| CN109919368A (en) * | 2019-02-26 | 2019-06-21 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of law article recommendation forecasting system and method based on associated diagram |
| CN110232447A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-09-13 | 杭州实在智能科技有限公司 | Legal case depth reasoning method |
| CN110175605A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-27 | 北京市律典通科技有限公司 | Electronics trial data processing method and device based on element formula |
| CN110377759A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-25 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Event relation map construction method and device |
| CN110377759B (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2022-02-11 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Method and device for constructing event relation graph |
| WO2021051931A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2021-03-25 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and device for determining probability of winning legal case, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium |
| WO2021051866A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2021-03-25 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and apparatus for determining case judgment result, device, and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN110825880A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2020-02-21 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Case winning rate determining method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
| WO2021057202A1 (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2021-04-01 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Method and apparatus for processing judgement result |
| CN110889502B (en) * | 2019-10-15 | 2024-02-06 | 东南大学 | Deep learning-based dispute focus generation method |
| CN110889502A (en) * | 2019-10-15 | 2020-03-17 | 东南大学 | Deep learning-based dispute focus generation method |
| CN110929039A (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2020-03-27 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Data processing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN110929039B (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2023-09-29 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Data processing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| WO2021073409A1 (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2021-04-22 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Data processing method, apparatus and device and storage medium |
| CN112988957A (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2021-06-18 | 共道网络科技有限公司 | Case pre-judgment result generation method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN112988957B (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2023-04-07 | 共道网络科技有限公司 | Case pre-judgment result generation method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN111291548A (en) * | 2020-02-12 | 2020-06-16 | 中科鼎富（北京）科技发展有限公司 | Method and device for acquiring information from court documents |
| CN111797230A (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2020-10-20 | 南京擎盾信息科技有限公司 | Legal three-layer theory automatic reasoning method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN111797230B (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2021-07-13 | 南京擎盾信息科技有限公司 | Legal three-layer theory automatic reasoning method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN111798344A (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2020-10-20 | 北京金堤科技有限公司 | Method and device for determining subject name, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN111798344B (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2023-09-22 | 北京金堤科技有限公司 | Principal name determining method and apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium |
| CN111898361A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2020-11-06 | 南京擎盾信息科技有限公司 | Legal text parsing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112199466B (en) * | 2020-09-08 | 2024-04-12 | 深圳价值在线信息科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for identifying associated rule of mail |
| CN112199466A (en) * | 2020-09-08 | 2021-01-08 | 深圳价值在线信息科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for identifying associated regulation of mail |
| CN112307726B (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2023-08-04 | 浙江大学 | Automatic court view generation method guided by causal deviation removal model |
| CN112307726A (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-02-02 | 浙江大学 | Automatic court opinion generation method guided by causal deviation removal model |
| CN112329891B (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2022-05-31 | 浙江大学 | Auxiliary case decision method, device and medium combining bidirectional attention and case decision logic |
| CN112329891A (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2021-02-05 | 浙江大学 | Auxiliary case decision method, device and medium combining bidirectional attention and case decision logic |
| CN113010684A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-06-22 | 北京法意科技有限公司 | Construction method and system of civil complaint and judgment map |
| CN113010684B (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2024-02-09 | 北京法意科技有限公司 | Construction method and system of civil complaint judging map |
| CN113535871B (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2024-02-27 | 杨粤湘 | Travel map-based vehicle destination prediction method, device, equipment and medium |
| CN113535871A (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2021-10-22 | 杨粤湘 | Vehicle destination prediction method, device, equipment and medium based on travel map |
| CN117273008A (en) * | 2023-08-30 | 2023-12-22 | 北京华夏电通科技股份有限公司 | Referee document generation method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN117273008B (en) * | 2023-08-30 | 2024-06-04 | 北京华夏电通科技股份有限公司 | Referee document generation method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN117349388A (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-01-05 | 南京智绘星图信息科技有限公司 | Data timeliness determination method and electronic equipment |
| CN117349388B (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-02-20 | 南京智绘星图信息科技有限公司 | Data timeliness determination method and electronic equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108304386A (en) | A kind of logic-based rule infers the method and device of legal documents court verdict | |
| Sabrina et al. | Lingual dominance and symbolic power in the discourse of using the PeduliLindungi application as a digital payment tool | |
| Ahl et al. | Towards judicial transparency in China: The new public access database for court decisions | |
| Baud et al. | Accounting ethics and the fragmentation of value | |
| Graham et al. | The international civil service: changing role and concepts | |
| Tran | Vietnamese technical trainees in Japan voice concerns amidst COVID-19 | |
| Neu et al. | Diffusing financial practices in Latin American higher education: understanding the intersection between global influence and the local context | |
| Finau et al. | Resistance is fertile: A Bourdieusian analysis of accounting and land reform in Fiji | |
| Rosenthal | Perspectives of directors of civilian oversight of law enforcement agencies | |
| Ardelia et al. | The acquisition of paraphrasing and its impact on teaching and learning quotations to avoid plagiarism | |
| Li et al. | The characteristics of local government debt governance: evidence from qualitative and social network analysis of Chinese policy texts | |
| Resnik | Mature Aggregation and Angst: Reframing Complex Litigation by Echoing Francis McGovern's Early Insights into Remedial Innovation | |
| Deignan et al. | Payback and punishment | |
| US11314938B2 (en) | Extracting actionable items from documents and assigning the actionable items to responsible parties | |
| Dueck et al. | HURIDOCS Events Standard Formats: A Tool for Documenting Human Rights Violations, English | |
| Krienert et al. | Crime and employment: Critical issues in crime reduction for corrections | |
| Li | Application Analysis of AI Technology in Tax Collection and Administration in China | |
| Dobrescu | Development in turbulent times: the many faces of inequality within Europe | |
| Schlanger | Jail strip-search cases: patterns and participants | |
| Zhang | Win in Chinese Courts: Practice Guide to Civil Litigation in China | |
| Matasio | Records Management in Friends Church (Quakers) in Kenya | |
| Wojcik et al. | Exploring Research Visibility of the FinAI COST Action Members: a Bibliometric Analysis of Topics | |
| Chasse | Access to Justice--Unaffordable Legal Services' Concepts and Solutions | |
| Csáki et al. | NLP in the Legal Profession: How about Small Languages? | |
| Wu | An analysis of the roots of modern Chinese Labour Law with particular reference to the PRC Labour Law 1994-crossing the river by feeling the stones |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180720 |