CN110618405B - Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability - Google Patents

Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110618405B
CN110618405B CN201910982920.0A CN201910982920A CN110618405B CN 110618405 B CN110618405 B CN 110618405B CN 201910982920 A CN201910982920 A CN 201910982920A CN 110618405 B CN110618405 B CN 110618405B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
interference
efficiency
radar
jamming
calculation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201910982920.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110618405A (en
Inventor
戎华
姜宁
陈明荣
吕明山
王龙涛
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PLA Naval University of Engineering
Original Assignee
PLA Dalian Naval Academy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by PLA Dalian Naval Academy filed Critical PLA Dalian Naval Academy
Priority to CN201910982920.0A priority Critical patent/CN110618405B/en
Publication of CN110618405A publication Critical patent/CN110618405A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110618405B publication Critical patent/CN110618405B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/38Jamming means, e.g. producing false echoes

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of electronic countermeasure, and relates to a radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on an interference mechanism and decision-making capability. The method is based on the radar active interference combat mechanism, takes the full flow and system hierarchy of equipment combat into consideration, selects parameters such as signal interception, signal sorting recognition, interference aiming, interference opportunity, interference pattern and interference power to scientifically construct an efficiency calculation index system, and dynamically calculates the signal analysis recognition efficiency and the interference pattern efficiency of an out-of-library radiation source target in the active interference combat process according to the personnel decision capability level on the basis of considering the combat performance of the equipment. The invention systematically researches each link relating to radar active interference fighting use, and can be specifically applied to the fields of fighting efficiency evaluation of different types of radar active interference equipment and the like.

Description

一种基于干扰机理与决策能力的雷达有源干扰效能测算方法A radar active jamming effectiveness measurement method based on jamming mechanism and decision-making ability

技术领域technical field

本发明属于电子对抗技术领域,具体涉及一种基于干扰机理与决策能力的雷达有源干扰效能测算方法。The invention belongs to the technical field of electronic countermeasures, and in particular relates to a method for measuring and calculating radar active jamming effectiveness based on jamming mechanism and decision-making ability.

背景技术Background technique

雷达有源干扰是雷达电子对抗中的重要环节,主要用来破坏对方雷达对我方目标的搜索、定位和跟踪,提高我平台的生命力和战斗力。其作战效能的准确计算,可为指挥员科学决策干扰和正确使用装备提供理论支撑。王睿在《距离指标对雷达噪声干扰效能的影响》一文中重点探讨了距离指标对雷达干扰的影响;罗金亮在《有源压制性干扰的干扰模糊区建模与仿真》一文中在相关评估准则基础上采用干扰模糊区的概念来计算雷达干扰效果;徐跃在《基于雷达探测距离的干扰效能评估》一文中引入频率瞄准因子和反对抗因子来改进基于雷达探测距离的干扰效能评枯模型;邹峰在《舰载雷达有源干扰效能评估研究》一文中从干扰信号层、干扰机层、系统层三个层次构建了雷达有源干扰效能评估指标。Radar active jamming is an important link in radar electronic countermeasures. It is mainly used to destroy the search, positioning and tracking of our targets by the opponent's radar, and improve the vitality and combat effectiveness of our platform. The accurate calculation of its combat effectiveness can provide theoretical support for the commander's scientific decision-making on interference and the correct use of equipment. Wang Rui focused on the influence of distance indicators on radar jamming in the article "The Effect of Distance Index on the Efficiency of Radar Noise Jamming"; In the paper, the concept of jamming ambiguity area is used to calculate the effect of radar jamming; Xu Yue introduced the frequency aiming factor and anti-resistance factor in the article "Jamming Effectiveness Evaluation Based on Radar Detection Range" to improve the jamming effectiveness evaluation model based on radar detection range; Zou In the article "Research on the Effectiveness Evaluation of Shipborne Radar Active Jamming", Feng constructed the radar active jamming effectiveness evaluation index from three levels: jamming signal layer, jamming machine layer, and system layer.

综述相关文献,目前关于有源干扰效能计算方法主要包括以下两类模式:一种基于固有能力的静态效能计算方法,一般采用专家评判法、多方案对比法、模糊综合评判法等进行解算,主要反映了系统本身性能和固有能力,不能体现出作战效能的动态性;另一种则是基于作战效果的动态效能计算方法,计算装备被用来执行特定作战任务所能达到目标的有效程度,不仅要考虑本装备的作战性能,而且要结合实时战场环境与作战态势,目前此类方法多集中于计算干扰指标对目标的影响程度,而有源干扰作战过程中库外辐射源目标的识别与干扰中人员的决策能力水平影响因素则未涉及。Summarizing the relevant literature, the current active interference effectiveness calculation methods mainly include the following two types of models: a static effectiveness calculation method based on inherent capabilities, generally using expert judgment method, multi-scheme comparison method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, etc. It mainly reflects the performance and inherent capabilities of the system itself, and cannot reflect the dynamics of combat effectiveness; the other is a dynamic effectiveness calculation method based on combat effects, which calculates the effectiveness of equipment used to perform specific combat tasks to achieve goals, Not only the combat performance of the equipment must be considered, but also the real-time battlefield environment and combat situation must be combined. At present, such methods mostly focus on calculating the influence degree of interference indicators on the target, while the identification of radiation sources and targets outside the library during active interference operations The influencing factors of the decision-making ability level of the personnel in the disturbance were not involved.

因此,为准确计算雷达有源干扰装备在实际作战运用的水平,其效能计算应主要从以下两个方面展开。一是根据干扰机理和作战流程,将有源干扰作战中的侦察、决策、干扰等环节作为一个系统有机整体,科学构建雷达有源干扰计算指标体系;二是在实际有源干扰作战时,人员决策能力水平高低直接决定库外干扰目标识别、干扰样式的选取等指标参数,即要考虑我方人员决策能力水平在库外辐射源目标作战过程中的重要影响。鉴于此,在进行雷达有源干扰效能计算时,应综合考虑有源干扰机理和人员决策能力水平等因素,结合静态效能和动态效能,准确计算有源干扰装备效能。Therefore, in order to accurately calculate the level of radar active jamming equipment used in actual combat, its effectiveness calculation should be mainly carried out from the following two aspects. One is to take the reconnaissance, decision-making, and jamming links in active jamming operations as an organic whole according to the jamming mechanism and combat process, and scientifically build a radar active jamming calculation index system; second, in actual active jamming operations, personnel The level of decision-making ability directly determines the identification of interference targets outside the library, the selection of interference patterns and other index parameters, that is, the important influence of the level of decision-making ability of our personnel on the combat process of radiation source targets outside the library must be considered. In view of this, when calculating the effectiveness of radar active jamming, factors such as active jamming mechanism and personnel decision-making ability level should be considered comprehensively, and the effectiveness of active jamming equipment should be accurately calculated by combining static effectiveness and dynamic effectiveness.

发明内容Contents of the invention

本发明从雷达有源干扰作战机理出发,考虑装备作战的全流程和系统层次性,选取信号截获、信号分选识别、干扰瞄准、干扰时机、干扰样式、干扰功率等参数科学构建效能计算指标体系,提供了一种基于干扰机理与决策能力的雷达有源干扰效能测算方法;在考虑装备的作战性能基础上,根据人员决策能力水平,动态计算有源干扰作战过程中库外辐射源目标的信号分析识别效能和干扰样式效能。The present invention starts from the radar active jamming operation mechanism, considers the whole process and system hierarchy of equipment operations, selects parameters such as signal interception, signal sorting and identification, interference targeting, interference timing, interference pattern, interference power and other parameters to scientifically construct an efficiency calculation index system , provides a radar active jamming effectiveness calculation method based on jamming mechanism and decision-making ability; on the basis of considering the combat performance of the equipment, according to the level of personnel decision-making ability, dynamically calculate the signal of the radiation source target outside the warehouse during the active jamming operation process Analyze recognition performance and interference pattern performance.

本发明的技术方案:Technical scheme of the present invention:

一种基于干扰机理与决策能力的雷达有源干扰效能测算方法,包括以下步骤:A radar active jamming effectiveness measurement method based on jamming mechanism and decision-making ability, comprising the following steps:

(一)根据雷达有源干扰机理,从信号获取的前端流程开始到干扰机工作,按照信号处理和利用的整个干扰作战流程,将有源干扰作战中的侦察作战(信号截获效能和信号分析识别效能)、指挥决策(干扰时机效能和干扰样式效能)、干扰作战(干扰瞄准效能和干扰功率效能)等环节作为一个系统有机整体,科学构建雷达有源干扰计算指标体系。(1) According to the radar active jamming mechanism, from the front-end process of signal acquisition to the jammer work, according to the entire jamming operation process of signal processing and utilization, the reconnaissance operations (signal interception effectiveness and signal analysis and identification) in active jamming operations Effectiveness), command decision-making (jamming timing effectiveness and jamming pattern effectiveness), jamming operations (jamming targeting effectiveness and jamming power effectiveness) and other links are taken as an organic whole of the system, and the radar active jamming calculation index system is scientifically constructed.

根据建立的计算指标体系,分别计算信号截获效能、信号分析识别效能、干扰瞄准效能、干扰功率效能,以及干扰时机效能和干扰样式效能,并进行指标相乘得到雷达有源干扰效能计算模型。信号截获效能、干扰瞄准效能、干扰功率效能,以及干扰时机效能四个指标可采用已知文献中的方法计算,对信号分析识别效能、干扰样式效能计算方法如下:According to the established calculation index system, the signal interception effectiveness, signal analysis and recognition effectiveness, jamming aiming effectiveness, jamming power effectiveness, jamming timing effectiveness and jamming style effectiveness are calculated respectively, and the calculation model of radar active jamming effectiveness is obtained by multiplying the indicators. The four indicators of signal interception performance, jamming targeting performance, jamming power performance, and jamming timing performance can be calculated using methods in known literature. The calculation methods for signal analysis and identification performance and jamming pattern performance are as follows:

(二)信号分析识别效能计算方法(2) Calculation method of signal analysis and identification performance

ER是衡量系统信号分析处理能力的综合性能指标,用信号处理概率和辐射源属性识别度两个因子来描述,具体为:ER=PS·ρE R is a comprehensive performance index to measure the signal analysis and processing capability of the system. It is described by two factors: signal processing probability and radiation source attribute recognition degree, specifically: E R = P S ·ρ

式中:PS为信号处理概率;ρ为辐射源属性识别度。信号处理概率PS由装备本身参数决定,辐射源属性识别度ρ的计算分为两种情况:数据库内、库外目标的识别。数据库内目标的ρ值直接根据具体装备参数而定;数据库外目标的ρ与人员知识水平密切相关,关系曲线近似呈幂指数型,其隶属函数为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000031
式中:k为专业理论考核成绩。In the formula: PS is the signal processing probability; ρ is the identification degree of radiation source attributes. The signal processing probability PS is determined by the parameters of the equipment itself, and the calculation of the radiation source attribute recognition degree ρ is divided into two situations: the identification of targets inside and outside the database. The ρ value of the target in the database is directly determined according to the specific equipment parameters; the ρ of the target outside the database is closely related to the knowledge level of personnel, and the relationship curve is approximately in the power exponential type, and its membership function is:
Figure BDA0002235791970000031
In the formula: k is the professional theory assessment result.

根据有源干扰作战任务要求,对干扰目标识别不仅要求人员具有过硬的专业理论知识,还需要较高的决策能力。即目标辐射源属性识别度不仅与人员的专业知识水平高低有关,还与心理素质、技能熟练程度、过往任务完成情况等这些影响人员决策能力的因素相关,则辐射源属性识别度ρ可采用以下指标进行修正。According to the requirements of active jamming combat missions, the identification of jamming targets not only requires personnel to have excellent professional theoretical knowledge, but also requires high decision-making capabilities. That is, the recognition degree of target radiation source attributes is not only related to the level of professional knowledge of personnel, but also related to factors that affect the decision-making ability of personnel such as psychological quality, skill proficiency, and past task completion. The radiation source attribute recognition degree ρ can be used as follows Indicators are corrected.

(1)修正指标一:心理素质因素μ1(x1)(1) Correction index one: Psychological quality factor μ 1 (x 1 )

由于武器装备操作的高度紧张以及作战复杂性的加剧,现代军事活动对人员心理素质的要求却越来越高,采用自我评价与组织评价的差距x1来表征人员的心理素质因素,其隶属函数为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000032
Due to the high tension in the operation of weapons and equipment and the aggravation of combat complexity, modern military activities have higher and higher requirements for the psychological quality of personnel. The gap between self-evaluation and organizational evaluation x 1 is used to characterize the psychological quality of personnel, and its membership function for:
Figure BDA0002235791970000032

(2)修正指标二:技能熟练程度μ2(x2)(2) Correction index 2: skill proficiency μ 2 (x 2 )

实践表明,一个没有应用实践的人,对于各种复杂和危险环境的作业能力就比较差。根据有源干扰库外目标识别特点,人员决策能力水平与其熟练程度紧密相关。典型的熟练效应曲线表现为指数曲线,它表明随着人员熟练程度(可用专业工作时间x2表示)的提高,人员操作可靠性将显著增加,因此技能熟练程度隶属函数可描述为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000041
Practice shows that a person who has no application practice has poor ability to work in various complex and dangerous environments. According to the characteristics of target identification outside the active jamming library, the level of personnel decision-making ability is closely related to their proficiency. The typical proficiency effect curve is an exponential curve, which shows that with the improvement of personnel proficiency (expressed by professional working time x 2 ), the reliability of personnel operation will increase significantly, so the membership function of skill proficiency can be described as:
Figure BDA0002235791970000041

(3)修正指标三:过往任务完成情况μ3(x3)(3) Correction indicator 3: Past task completion status μ 3 (x 3 )

库外目标的识别不光考虑人员知识水平、熟练程度等因素,也与人员的过往任务完成情况紧密相关。尤其在面对新信号、新情况下,在缺乏专家和资料的情况下,人员差错的可能性更大。因此衡量人员决策能力水平时参考其过往任务完成情况(表彰(+)或批评(-)次数),其隶属函数为:The identification of targets outside the library not only considers factors such as the knowledge level and proficiency of the personnel, but is also closely related to the completion of the personnel's past tasks. Especially in the face of new signals and new situations, in the absence of experts and data, the possibility of personnel errors is even greater. Therefore, when measuring the level of decision-making ability of personnel, refer to their past task completion (recognition (+) or criticism (-) times), and its membership function is:

Figure BDA0002235791970000042
Figure BDA0002235791970000042

(4)辐射源属性识别度ρ的修正计算公式:(4) The revised calculation formula of radiation source attribute recognition degree ρ:

在计算辐射源属性识别度时,专家根据各修正指标重要性设定权重值 (n1+n2+n3+n4=1),则ρ的计算公式为:When calculating the identification degree of radiation source attributes, experts set the weight value according to the importance of each correction index (n 1 +n 2 +n 3 +n 4 =1), then the calculation formula of ρ is:

Figure BDA0002235791970000043
Figure BDA0002235791970000043

(三)干扰样式效能计算方法(3) Calculation method of interference pattern effectiveness

EM是干扰样式效能,干扰机干扰样式的效能与雷达体制、雷达使用的抗干扰措施相关,更与使用人员的决策能力水平密切相关。因此,结合具体装备类型,将干扰样式效能计算分为两种情况:一是数据库内目标的干扰样式效能,二是数据库外目标的干扰样式效能。E M is the effectiveness of the jamming pattern. The effectiveness of the jamming pattern of the jammer is related to the radar system and anti-jamming measures used by the radar, and is closely related to the decision-making ability of the user. Therefore, combined with specific equipment types, the interference pattern effectiveness calculation is divided into two situations: one is the interference pattern effectiveness of targets in the database, and the other is the interference pattern effectiveness of targets outside the database.

(1)数据库内目标的干扰样式效能值(1) The interference pattern efficacy value of the target in the database

根据雷达干扰装备实际情况,数据库内目标的干扰样式效能EM值根据具体装备性能参数而定。According to the actual situation of radar jamming equipment, the jamming pattern effectiveness E M value of the target in the database is determined according to the specific equipment performance parameters.

(2)数据库外目标的干扰样式效能值(2) Interference pattern efficacy value of targets outside the database

根据干扰对象雷达的工作体制和抗干扰能力,不同干扰样式对不同体制雷达的干扰效能值不一样,称之为干扰样式理论值;同时,根据实物半实物仿真以及实际训练,得到不同干扰样式对不同体制雷达的效能值(称之为干扰样式经验值),采用成熟的加权融合算法,建立数值融合模型,计算出干扰样式理论值与干扰样式经验值的融合效能值,将该值作为干扰样式对雷达体制的作战效能值EM0According to the working system and anti-jamming ability of the radar of the jamming object, the jamming effectiveness values of different jamming patterns on different system radars are different, which is called the theoretical value of jamming patterns; The effectiveness values of radars of different systems (referred to as interference pattern experience values) are established by using a mature weighted fusion algorithm to establish a numerical fusion model, and the fusion effectiveness value of the interference pattern theoretical value and the interference pattern experience value is calculated, and this value is used as the interference pattern The operational effectiveness value E M0 of the radar system.

在计算出EM0基础上,考虑人员的决策能力水平,采用上文2.1.1.1~2.1.1.3 的修正指标对干扰样式作战效能值进一步修正,则数据库外目标的干扰样式效能值EM为:EM=m1EM0+m2μ1(x1)+m3μ2(x2)+m4μ3(x3)On the basis of calculating E M0 , taking into account the decision-making ability level of personnel, using the correction indicators in 2.1.1.1~2.1.1.3 above to further correct the combat effectiveness value of the jamming pattern, then the jamming pattern effectiveness value E M of the target outside the database is: E M =m 1 E M0 +m 2 μ 1 (x 1 )+m 3 μ 2 (x 2 )+m 4 μ 3 (x 3 )

m1~m4权重值由专家根据各修正指标重要性设定(m1+m2+m3+m4=1)。The weight values of m 1 ~m 4 are set by experts according to the importance of each correction index (m 1 +m 2 +m 3 +m 4 =1).

从作战使用角度出发,有源干扰效果主要取决于信号截获、信号分选识别、干扰瞄准、干扰时机、干扰样式、干扰功率等,因此有源干扰动态效能计算模型:E=EIERECEMETEP From the perspective of combat use, the effect of active jamming mainly depends on signal interception, signal sorting and identification, jamming targeting, jamming timing, jamming style, jamming power, etc. Therefore, the dynamic effectiveness calculation model of active jamming: E=E I E R E C E M E T E P

本发明提出的效能计算方法综合考虑了有源干扰机理和人员决策能力,科学建立了一个依据有源干扰作战全流程的效能计算模型,系统地研究了涉及雷达有源干扰作战使用的每个环节,包括侦察、决策、干扰等方面,研究成果能具体应用到不同类型雷达有源干扰装备的作战效能评估等领域;同时研究成果可为指挥员开展电子对抗方案筹划、装备使用效果检验等方面提供依据,并可成为电子对抗在线效果评估的重要功能点。The effectiveness calculation method proposed by the present invention comprehensively considers the active jamming mechanism and personnel decision-making ability, scientifically establishes an effectiveness calculation model based on the whole process of active jamming operations, and systematically studies every link involving the use of radar active jamming operations , including reconnaissance, decision-making, jamming, etc. The research results can be specifically applied to the combat effectiveness evaluation of different types of radar active jamming equipment. basis, and can become an important function point for evaluating online effects of electronic countermeasures.

附图说明Description of drawings

图1为雷达有源干扰装备效能计算指标体系。Figure 1 shows the calculation index system of radar active jamming equipment effectiveness.

图2为雷达有源干扰装备效能计算流程。Figure 2 shows the calculation process of the effectiveness of radar active jamming equipment.

具体实施方式detailed description

以下结合附图和技术方案,进一步说明本发明的具体实施方式。The specific implementation manners of the present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and technical solutions.

一种基于干扰机理与决策能力的雷达有源干扰效能测算方法,包括以下步骤:A radar active jamming effectiveness measurement method based on jamming mechanism and decision-making ability, comprising the following steps:

1信号截获效能的计算1 Calculation of signal interception performance

信号截获效能指标反映的是系统在战术任务要求的频域、空域内截获信号的能力。考察信号截获效能首先要考虑系统战术任务所要求覆盖的频域、空域,其次要考察系统所能覆盖的频域、空域,最后则要分析系统在其频域或空域范围内的信号截获能力。The signal interception performance index reflects the ability of the system to intercept signals in the frequency domain and airspace required by tactical missions. To examine the signal interception effectiveness, we must first consider the frequency domain and airspace required by the system’s tactical tasks, secondly examine the frequency domain and airspace that the system can cover, and finally analyze the system’s signal interception capabilities within its frequency domain or airspace.

系统信号截获效能计算模型用下式表示:

Figure BDA0002235791970000061
The system signal interception efficiency calculation model is expressed by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002235791970000061

式中:θI1——侦察分系统实际达到的侦察方位覆盖范围;θI10——期望的或作战任务规定的方位覆盖范围;θI2——侦察分系统实际达到的侦察俯仰覆盖范围;θI20——期望的或作战任务规定的俯仰覆盖范围;ΔFI——侦察分系统实际达到的侦察频率覆盖范围;ΔFI0——期望的或作战任务规定的频率覆盖范围; PI——侦察分系统接收机的截获概率。In the formula: θ I1 ——the reconnaissance azimuth coverage actually achieved by the reconnaissance subsystem; θ I10 ——the azimuth coverage expected or specified by the combat mission; θ I2 ——the reconnaissance pitch coverage actually achieved by the reconnaissance subsystem; θ I20 - Desired or mission-specified elevation coverage; ΔF I - Actual reconnaissance frequency coverage achieved by the reconnaissance subsystem; ΔF I0 - Desired or combat mission-specified frequency coverage; P I - Reconnaissance subsystem Receiver probability of intercept.

假定电子对抗侦察装备方位、俯仰、频率的范围均覆盖期望范围,取值均为1,侦察接收机的截获概率PI为0.98,则有EI=0.98。Assuming that the azimuth, elevation, and frequency ranges of the electronic countermeasure reconnaissance equipment all cover the expected range, and the values are all 1, and the interception probability P I of the reconnaissance receiver is 0.98, then E I =0.98.

2信号分析识别效能的计算2. Calculation of Signal Analysis and Recognition Efficiency

根据某雷达对抗系统的设计方案以及人员的能力水平,侦察机信号处理概率PS为0.99,修正指标权重值n1=0.6,n2,n4=0.1,n3=0.2,专业考核分数 k=97,心理素质评价值差距|x1|=8,工作时间x2=10年,过往任务完成情况被表扬5次,即x3=5,因此According to the design scheme of a radar countermeasure system and the ability level of personnel, the signal processing probability PS of the reconnaissance aircraft is 0.99, the weight value of the correction index n 1 = 0.6, n 2 , n 4 = 0.1, n 3 = 0.2, and the professional assessment score k =97, the psychological quality evaluation value gap |x 1 |=8, the working time x 2 =10 years, the completion of past tasks was praised 5 times, that is, x 3 =5, so

ρ=0.6×0.972+0.1×0.17+0.2×0.918+0.1×1=0.865ρ=0.6×0.97 2 +0.1×0.17+0.2×0.918+0.1×1=0.865

辐射源属性识别度ρ为0.865,则有ER=PS·ρ=0.99·0.865=0.86。The radiation source attribute recognition degree ρ is 0.865, then E R =PS·ρ=0.99·0.865=0.86.

3干扰瞄准效能的计算3 Calculation of interference aiming effectiveness

EC是干扰引导瞄准效能,表示电子对抗系统引导干扰发射装备实施干扰的能力,该能力用相对干扰覆盖系数和引导概率来描述,即 EC is the jamming guidance aiming effectiveness, which means the ability of the electronic countermeasure system to guide the jamming launch equipment to implement jamming. This capability is described by the relative jamming coverage coefficient and guidance probability, namely

Figure BDA0002235791970000071
Figure BDA0002235791970000071

式中:ΔΩc是作战任务规定的干扰空域;Δωc是系统实际达到的干扰空域;ΔFc是作战任务规定的干扰频段;Δfc是系统实际达到的干扰频段;PC是方位引导概率和频率引导概率的乘积。In the formula: ΔΩ c is the interference airspace specified in the combat mission; Δω c is the interference airspace actually reached by the system; ΔF c is the interference frequency band specified in the combat mission; Δf c is the interference frequency band actually reached by the system; P C is the azimuth guidance probability and The product of frequency-guided probabilities.

计算时假定有源干扰机完全满足覆盖要求,相对干扰覆盖系数为1;方位引导概率和频率引导概率均为1,因此,干扰瞄准效能值为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000072
The calculation assumes that the active jammer fully meets the coverage requirements, and the relative interference coverage factor is 1; the azimuth guidance probability and frequency guidance probability are both 1, therefore, the jamming aiming effectiveness value is:
Figure BDA0002235791970000072

Figure BDA0002235791970000073
Figure BDA0002235791970000073

4干扰时机效能的计算4 Calculation of Interference Timing Effectiveness

ET是干扰时机效能,表示在雷达威胁时间内干扰机正确实施干扰的效能,ET越大干扰效果越好。可表示为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000074
ET is the effectiveness of jamming timing, which means the effectiveness of the jammer to correctly implement jamming within the radar threat time . The larger the ET, the better the jamming effect. Can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0002235791970000074

其中,T1~T2为雷达威胁时间,(tSj,tEj),j-1,…,n为干扰机干扰的n段时间,满足tSj,tEj∈(T1,T2),ωj为各段的权重,

Figure BDA0002235791970000075
Among them, T 1 ~ T 2 is the radar threat time, (t Sj ,t Ej ),j-1,…,n is the n period of jammer interference, satisfying t Sj ,t Ej ∈(T 1 ,T 2 ) , ω j is the weight of each segment,
Figure BDA0002235791970000075

雷达开机30秒,假设干扰机识别后即开始干扰所需时间5秒,其时间包括截获时间、识别时间、人员反应时间及干扰反应时间等。The radar is turned on for 30 seconds, assuming that the jamming starts after the jammer is identified, it takes 5 seconds. The time includes interception time, identification time, personnel reaction time, and interference reaction time.

干扰时机效能值为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000076
Interference timing performance value is:
Figure BDA0002235791970000076

5干扰样式效能的计算5 Calculation of Interference Pattern Effectiveness

采用一种改进的加权融合估计算法,其核心思想是考虑各个传感器的局部估计,按照合理的原则给各个传感器制定加权因子,最后加权综合所有的局部估计得到全局系统估计,具体步骤为:An improved weighted fusion estimation algorithm is adopted. The core idea is to consider the local estimation of each sensor, formulate weighting factors for each sensor according to reasonable principles, and finally obtain the global system estimation by weighting and integrating all local estimations. The specific steps are:

假设讨论N个传感器航迹融合的情况,传感器M1,M2,……,MS(S≤N)存在互相关联的航迹,假定对于同一目标,传感器M1,M2,……,MS的局部估计和相应的误差协方差矩阵分别为:

Figure BDA0002235791970000081
Figure BDA0002235791970000082
m∈{M1,M2,……,MS},设各传感器 M1,M2,……,MS的加权因子分别为W1,W2,……,WS,假定
Figure BDA0002235791970000083
是无偏估计,且任意两个传感器局部估计误差间互不相关,则有总均方误差为:Assuming that the fusion of N sensor tracks is discussed, there are interrelated tracks for sensors M 1 , M 2 ,...,M S (S≤N). Assume that for the same target, sensors M 1 , M 2 ,..., The local estimates of M S and the corresponding error covariance matrix are:
Figure BDA0002235791970000081
and
Figure BDA0002235791970000082
m∈{M 1 ,M 2 ,……,M S }, let the weighting factors of each sensor M 1 ,M 2 ,……,M S be respectively W 1 ,W 2 ,……,W S , assuming
Figure BDA0002235791970000083
is an unbiased estimate, and the local estimation errors of any two sensors are not correlated with each other, then the total mean square error is:

Figure BDA0002235791970000084
Figure BDA0002235791970000084

在各传感器局部估计误差互不相关的假设下,即

Figure BDA0002235791970000085
彼此独立,并且都是x的无偏估计,所以:Under the assumption that the local estimation errors of each sensor are independent of each other, that is,
Figure BDA0002235791970000085
are independent of each other and are both unbiased estimates of x, so:

Figure BDA0002235791970000086
Figure BDA0002235791970000086

从而总均方误差P为:So the total mean square error P is:

Figure BDA0002235791970000087
Figure BDA0002235791970000087

根据式(3),进一步求出总均方误差最小时所对应的加权因子为:According to formula (3), the weighting factor corresponding to the minimum total mean square error is further calculated as:

Figure BDA0002235791970000088
Figure BDA0002235791970000088

此时所对应的最小均方误差为:The corresponding minimum mean square error at this time is:

Figure BDA0002235791970000089
Figure BDA0002235791970000089

由式(3)、(4)建立新的加权融合算法模型,即最优自适应加权融合算法模型,它的融合方程为:A new weighted fusion algorithm model is established by formulas (3) and (4), that is, the optimal adaptive weighted fusion algorithm model, and its fusion equation is:

Figure BDA00022357919700000810
Figure BDA00022357919700000810

根据某型有源干扰装备参数,该型装备对脉间压缩雷达采取有效干扰样式理论效能值为0.93,干扰样式经验值为0.89,采用上面融合算法进行融合后的干扰样式作战效能值EM0=0.915。According to the parameters of a certain type of active jamming equipment, the theoretical effectiveness value of the effective jamming pattern adopted by this type of equipment for the interpulse compression radar is 0.93, the empirical value of the jamming pattern is 0.89, and the operational effectiveness value of the jamming pattern E M0 = 0.915.

修正指标权重值n1=0.7,n2,n3,n4=0.1,具体修正指标参数同上文2.2,则针对数据库外脉间压缩体制雷达目标的干扰样式效能EM则可计算出:Correction index weight value n 1 = 0.7, n 2 , n 3 , n 4 = 0.1, the specific correction index parameters are the same as in 2.2 above, then the interference pattern effectiveness E M of the radar target in the database external pulse compression system can be calculated as follows:

EM=0.7×0.915+0.1×0.17+0.1×0.918+0.1×1=0.85E M =0.7×0.915+0.1×0.17+0.1×0.918+0.1×1=0.85

6干扰功率效能的计算6 Calculation of interference power effectiveness

EP是干扰功率效能,是衡量干扰机干扰能力的综合性能指标,EP越大干扰效果越好,干扰功率效能可表示为:E P is the interference power efficiency, which is a comprehensive performance index to measure the interference capability of the jammer. The larger the E P is, the better the interference effect is. The interference power efficiency can be expressed as:

Figure BDA0002235791970000091
Figure BDA0002235791970000091

其中,KJ1,KJ2分别表示干扰机开始、结束干扰时的压制系数,

Figure BDA0002235791970000092
(Kmin,Kmax)为干扰机对雷达有效干扰的压制系数取值范围。Among them, K J1 and K J2 respectively represent the suppression coefficients when the jammer starts and ends the jamming,
Figure BDA0002235791970000092
(K min , K max ) is the value range of the suppressing coefficient of the jammer's effective jamming to the radar.

压制系数可表示:The compression coefficient can be expressed as:

Figure BDA0002235791970000093
Figure BDA0002235791970000093

式中:In the formula:

KJ:掩护目标干扰压制系数;Pj:干扰发射功率;Gj:干扰天线增益;K J : Cover target interference suppression coefficient; P j : Interference transmission power; G j : Interference antenna gain;

Pt:雷达发射功率;Gt:雷达发射天线增益;μ:雷达馈线损耗(取0.4-0.6)P t : radar transmit power; G t : radar transmit antenna gain; μ: radar feeder loss (take 0.4-0.6)

Rt:雷达到干扰机之间的距离;Lj:极化损耗;σ:目标雷达反射面积;Δf0:雷达接收机中频带宽;Δfj:干扰信号带宽。R t : distance between radar and jammer; L j : polarization loss; σ: target radar reflection area; Δf 0 : radar receiver IF bandwidth; Δf j : jamming signal bandwidth.

计算时假定目标雷达从150km处开机,飞机以250米每秒向我接近,5秒后被干扰,30秒后关机。干扰机开始干扰和干扰结束时刻,目标距离我方侦察机的距离分别为148.75km和142.5km;During the calculation, it is assumed that the target radar is turned on from 150km away, the aircraft approaches me at 250 meters per second, is interfered after 5 seconds, and turns off after 30 seconds. At the moment when the jammer starts jamming and when the jamming ends, the distance between the target and our reconnaissance plane is 148.75km and 142.5km respectively;

目标雷达相关计算参数:Target radar related calculation parameters:

发射功率Pt:20kwTransmission power P t : 20kw

天线增益Gt:36dBAntenna gain G t : 36dB

接收带宽Δf0:10MHzReceive bandwidth Δf 0 : 10MHz

雷达开机时间:30sRadar boot time: 30s

我有源干扰设备相关计算参数:I have active interference equipment related calculation parameters:

保护目标雷达反射截面积σ:500m2 Protection target radar reflection cross section σ: 500m 2

辐射功率Pj:5kwRadiation power P j : 5kw

天线增益Gj:20dBAntenna gain G j : 20dB

阻塞干扰Δfj:40MHzBlocking interference Δf j : 40MHz

极化损耗Lj:13dBPolarization loss L j : 13dB

压制系数范围(Kmin,Kmax):5dB—12dBSuppression coefficient range (K min , K max ): 5dB—12dB

则有:Then there are:

Figure BDA0002235791970000101
Figure BDA0002235791970000101

Figure BDA0002235791970000102
Figure BDA0002235791970000102

压制系数KJ1,KJ2均大于12dB,所以干扰功率效能EP=1。The suppression coefficients K J1 and K J2 are both larger than 12dB, so the interference power efficiency E P =1.

7雷达有源干扰效能的计算7 Calculation of Radar Active Jamming Effectiveness

根据有源干扰作战效能的计算模型,结合上述各作战效能计算结果,则有: E=EIERECEMETEP=0.98×0.85×1×0.833×0.85×1=0.59。According to the calculation model of active jamming combat effectiveness, combined with the calculation results of the above combat effectiveness, there is: E=E I E R E C E M E T E P =0.98×0.85×1×0.833×0.85×1=0.59.

Claims (1)

1. A radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on an interference mechanism and decision-making capability comprises the following steps:
(I) constructing radar active interference calculation index system
Respectively calculating signal interception efficiency, signal analysis and identification efficiency, interference aiming efficiency, interference power efficiency, interference opportunity efficiency and interference pattern efficiency according to the established calculation index system, and multiplying indexes to obtain a radar active interference efficiency calculation model;
the four indexes of signal interception efficiency, interference aiming efficiency, interference power efficiency and interference opportunity efficiency can be calculated by methods in known documents, and the methods for analyzing and identifying signals and calculating interference pattern efficiency are as follows:
(1) Signal analysis and identification efficiency calculation method
E R The comprehensive performance index for measuring the system signal analysis processing capability is described by two factors of signal processing probability and radiation source attribute identification degree, and specifically comprises the following steps: e R =P S ·ρ
In the formula: p is S Is the signal processing probability; rho is the radiation source attribute identification degree; probability of signal processing P S The calculation of the radiation source attribute identification degree rho is divided into two cases according to the parameters of the equipment: identifying targets inside and outside the database; the rho value of the target in the database is directly determined according to specific equipment parameters; rho of a target outside the database is closely related to the knowledge level of personnel, a relation curve is approximately in a power exponential type, and a membership function of the relation curve is as follows:
Figure FDA0003892497200000011
in the formula: k is professional theoretical assessment results;
the radiation source attribute identification rho is corrected by adopting the following indexes:
the first correction index is as follows: psychological diathesisFactors of the design
Figure FDA0003892497200000012
And a second correction index: skill proficiency level
Figure FDA0003892497200000013
Correction index three: past task completion
Figure FDA0003892497200000014
Wherein x is 1 Representing the difference between self-evaluation and tissue evaluation; x is a radical of a fluorine atom 2 Representing professional working hours; x is the number of 3 Representing the completion condition of the past task, and showing the number of times of the approval or the criticizing;
a correction calculation formula of the radiation source attribute identification degree rho is as follows:
when calculating the attribute identification degree of the radiation source, the expert sets a weight value according to the importance of each correction index, wherein n 1 +n 2 +n 3 +n 4 =1, then ρ is calculated as:
Figure FDA0003892497200000021
(2) Interference pattern efficiency calculation method
E M The performance of the interference pattern of the interference machine is related to the radar system and the anti-interference measures used by the radar, and is more closely related to the decision-making capability level of users; therefore, in conjunction with a specific equipment type, the interference pattern performance calculation is divided into two cases: the interference pattern efficiency of the target in the database, and the interference pattern efficiency of the target outside the database;
interference pattern efficiency values for targets within database: according to the actual situation of radar interference equipment, the interference pattern efficiency E of the target in the database M The values are dependent on the specific equipment performance parameters;
interference samples of targets outside of databaseFormula (I) efficacy value: according to the working system and the anti-interference capability of the interference object radar, the interference effectiveness values of different interference patterns to the radars with different systems are different and are called as interference pattern theoretical values; meanwhile, according to the physical semi-physical simulation and the actual training, the effectiveness values of different interference patterns on radars of different systems are obtained, a numerical fusion model is established by adopting a mature weighted fusion algorithm, the fusion effectiveness value of the theoretical value of the interference pattern and the empirical value of the interference pattern is calculated, and the value is used as the combat effectiveness value E of the interference pattern on the radar system M0
In the calculation of E M0 On the basis, the interference pattern combat effect value is further corrected by adopting the correction index, and then the interference pattern effect value E of the target outside the database M Comprises the following steps: e M =m 1 E M0 +m 2 μ 1 (x 1 )+m 3 μ 2 (x 2 )+m 4 μ 3 (x 3 )
m 1 ~m 4 The weight value is set by the expert according to the importance of each correction index, wherein m 1 +m 2 +m 3 +m 4 =1;
From the angle of operation use, the active interference effect mainly depends on signal interception, signal sorting and identification, interference aiming, interference opportunity, interference pattern and interference power, so that the active interference dynamic efficiency calculation model is as follows: e = E I E R E C E M E T E P
CN201910982920.0A 2019-10-16 2019-10-16 Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability Active CN110618405B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910982920.0A CN110618405B (en) 2019-10-16 2019-10-16 Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910982920.0A CN110618405B (en) 2019-10-16 2019-10-16 Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110618405A CN110618405A (en) 2019-12-27
CN110618405B true CN110618405B (en) 2022-12-27

Family

ID=68925542

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910982920.0A Active CN110618405B (en) 2019-10-16 2019-10-16 Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110618405B (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111142076B (en) * 2020-01-06 2023-09-05 西南电子技术研究所(中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所) Power control method for improving radar low-interception performance
CN111157963B (en) * 2020-01-31 2020-08-25 中国人民解放军32802部队 Online evaluation method for interference effect of active phased array radar
CN111427018A (en) * 2020-04-22 2020-07-17 安徽华可智能科技有限公司 Radar interference equipment interference effect evaluation method
CN111474524A (en) * 2020-04-22 2020-07-31 安徽华可智能科技有限公司 Radar interference equipment interference effect monitoring and decision support system
CN112612218B (en) * 2020-12-09 2023-04-18 南京长峰航天电子科技有限公司 Electronic countermeasure simulation system and method
CN112651181B (en) * 2020-12-31 2024-03-26 西安大衡天成信息科技有限公司 Radar countermeasure strategy modeling and simulation method based on zero and game
CN112904294B (en) * 2021-03-04 2023-06-30 西安电子科技大学 Radar interference effect evaluation method based on intuitive trapezoidal fuzzy multi-attribute decision
CN113253207B (en) * 2021-04-26 2024-02-02 中国人民解放军海军大连舰艇学院 Simulation evaluation method for influence on probability of killing target of air-defense missile
CN113687318B (en) * 2021-07-05 2024-04-30 西安电子科技大学 Radar anti-interference efficacy evaluation method
CN113836699A (en) * 2021-08-31 2021-12-24 成都众享天地网络科技有限公司 Radar countermeasure capability evaluation method based on nonlinear SEM
CN114696941B (en) * 2022-03-16 2024-12-06 中国人民解放军93209部队 A method for generating main indicators of out-of-area aviation communication countermeasure equipment
CN115372912A (en) * 2022-08-17 2022-11-22 中国人民解放军海军大连舰艇学院 A Method for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Shipborne Radar Active Jamming System

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4025920A (en) * 1972-09-28 1977-05-24 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Identification of radar systems
CN104239712A (en) * 2014-09-05 2014-12-24 电子科技大学 Real-time evaluation method for anti-interference performance of radar
RU2665096C1 (en) * 2018-04-13 2018-08-28 Валерий Анатольевич Селифанов Method for two-level management and system for its implementation (options)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020006612A1 (en) * 1998-05-21 2002-01-17 Glaxosmithkline Corporate Intellectual Property Methods and systems of identifying exceptional data patterns
CN106934237A (en) * 2017-03-09 2017-07-07 上海交通大学 Radar cross-section redaction measures of effectiveness creditability measurement implementation method
JP6802134B2 (en) * 2017-09-27 2020-12-16 Kddi株式会社 Operator selection device, operator selection system, program and operator selection method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4025920A (en) * 1972-09-28 1977-05-24 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Identification of radar systems
CN104239712A (en) * 2014-09-05 2014-12-24 电子科技大学 Real-time evaluation method for anti-interference performance of radar
RU2665096C1 (en) * 2018-04-13 2018-08-28 Валерий Анатольевич Селифанов Method for two-level management and system for its implementation (options)

Non-Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Distributed adaptive beam nulling to survive against jamming in 3D UAV mesh networks;Suman Bhunia;《Computer Networks》;20180316;83-97 *
Research on jamming efficiency and measures against Mono-pulse radar;Rong Hua;《2015 IEEE advanced information technlogy,electronic and automation control conference》;20151231;883-886 *
一种雷达对抗有源干扰装备作战效能评估方法;戎华等;《舰船电子工程》;20160420(第04期);112-114 *
一种雷达辐射源识别自学习算法研究;李文宫等;《指挥控制与仿真》;20080815(第04期);53-56 *
基于FAHP的岸防炮兵雷达作战效能评估分析方法;王鹏等;《火力与指挥控制》;20090915(第09期);112-115 *
基于属性测度理论的群决策效果评价;周晓光等;《北京理工大学学报》;20070228(第02期);89-93 *
基于干扰方的干扰效果评估研究;李潮等;《电子信息对抗技术》;20080315(第02期);49-52 *
基于雷达探测距离的舰艇编队有源协同压制干扰效能分析;成伽等;《科技视界》;20150525(第15期);163-165 *
多传感器信息融合NFE模型的研究及应用;宗华等;《电子与信息学报》;20100315(第03期);18-23 *
对光电精确制导武器的区域电子防空干扰目标分配方法;欧阳志宏等;《系统工程与电子技术》;20181108(第12期);6-13 *
干扰机压制雷达网作战效果评估及仿真;朱锦辉等;《舰船电子工程》;20091220(第12期);120-123 *
机载电子战效能评估模型研究;蓝启城;《航天电子对抗》;20101231;57-60 *
航空武器仿真中雷达干扰效果评估模块;张巨泉等;《现代雷达》;20040430(第04期);3-6、22 *
雷达干扰系统作战效能评估模型;谢虹;《航天电子对抗》;20000710(第03期);42-45 *
雷达抗有源压制性干扰综合效能评估;金虎兵等;《电讯技术》;20081015(第10期);58-61 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110618405A (en) 2019-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110618405B (en) Radar active interference efficiency measuring and calculating method based on interference mechanism and decision-making capability
CN111157963B (en) Online evaluation method for interference effect of active phased array radar
CN110414061A (en) The method for establishing aircraft platform system air-to-ground attack survival ability probabilistic model
CN113687318B (en) Radar anti-interference efficacy evaluation method
AU2005329071A1 (en) Self-calibrating shooter estimation
CN109828245A (en) Determination method, apparatus, computer equipment and the storage medium of radar chaff strategy
CN115236607A (en) Radar anti-interference strategy optimization method based on double-layer Q learning
CN104504728B (en) Multiple maneuver target tracking methods, system and broad sense JPDA device thereof
CN115063544A (en) Radar detection power range calculation method for accompanying support interference
CN106405510A (en) Pseudo sliding window L judgment rule-based flight trajectory deletion method
Rhudy et al. Microphone array analysis methods using cross-correlations
CN112162246B (en) Complex electromagnetic environment effect analysis method based on Bayesian network radar system
CN105426634B (en) An early warning aircraft battlefield survivability assessment method
CN108507577B (en) A kind of mission planning method based on data-link and aircraft sensibility
CN112269401B (en) Adaptive Active Sensor Tracking Method Based on Tracking Accuracy and Risk Control
CN116930880B (en) A dynamic assessment method for deception and jamming threats
CN118095961A (en) A collaborative combat effectiveness evaluation method based on entropy weight and subjective experience weighting
CN106257302A (en) A kind of cognitive radar target tracking method under clutter environment
CN113253207B (en) Simulation evaluation method for influence on probability of killing target of air-defense missile
Gong et al. Automatic radar jamming strategy generation based on EWD3Q algorithm
CN114202185A (en) System contribution rate evaluation method for high-power microwave weapon collaborative air defense
CN110308420A (en) A Method of False Track Quantity Prediction Based on Multi-Station Passive Positioning
Wang et al. Formation electronic countermeasure equipment capability assessment based on training data
WO2021006825A1 (en) Statistical shooter range estimating method using microphone array
Boggs Geolocation of an audio source in a multipath environment using time-of-arrival

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant