CN110222935B

CN110222935B - Natural disaster damage assessment method and device

Info

Publication number: CN110222935B
Application number: CN201910381743.0A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 叶有华; 陈晓意; 曾祉祥
Original assignee: Shenzhen Zhongda Environmental Science And Technology Innovation Engineering Center Co ltd
Current assignee: Shenzhen Zhongda Environmental Science And Technology Innovation Engineering Center Co ltd
Priority date: 2019-05-08
Filing date: 2019-05-08
Publication date: 2021-11-30
Anticipated expiration: 2039-05-08
Also published as: CN110222935A

Abstract

The embodiment of the application discloses a natural disaster damage assessment method and a device, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters; performing risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, and generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result; performing loss evaluation based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss evaluation result, and generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result; and outputting and displaying a risk assessment report and a loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed. By adopting the embodiment of the application, the damage of the natural disaster can be accurately evaluated.

Description

Natural disaster damage assessment method and device

Technical Field

The application relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to a natural disaster damage assessment method and device.

Background

Natural resource capitalization has grown in popularity and research, but is not technically mature. Natural resource capitalization projects natural disaster damage no technique is available to reference this evaluation. At present, the natural disaster damage is evaluated in a manual mode, and the evaluation efficiency is low and the accuracy is not high, so that a technology for accurately evaluating the natural disaster damage is needed.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the application provides a natural disaster damage assessment method and device, which are used for accurately assessing natural disaster damage.

A first aspect of an embodiment of the present application provides a natural disaster damage assessment method, where the method includes:

acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters;

performing risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, and generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result;

performing loss evaluation based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss evaluation result, and generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result;

and outputting and displaying the risk assessment report and the loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed.

With reference to the first aspect of the embodiment of the present application, in a first possible implementation manner of the first aspect, the performing risk assessment based on the N target risk parameters includes performing risk assessment based on a target geological parameter, a target hydrological parameter, and a target climate parameter, and obtaining a risk assessment result includes:

inputting the target geological parameter, the target hydrological parameter and the target climate parameter into a risk assessment model, wherein the risk assessment model is used for determining risk size and risk loss based on risk parameters, and the risk assessment model stores a mapping relation between geological parameters and risk occurrence probability, a mapping relation between hydrological parameters and risk occurrence probability, a mapping relation between climate parameters and risk occurrence probability, a risk size formula and a risk loss formula in advance;

determining a first risk occurrence probability corresponding to the target geological parameter based on the mapping relation between the geological parameter and the risk occurrence probability;

determining a second risk occurrence probability corresponding to the target hydrological parameter based on the mapping relation between the hydrological parameter and the risk occurrence probability;

determining a third risk occurrence probability corresponding to the target climate parameter based on the mapping relation between the climate parameter and the risk occurrence probability;

determining target risk sizes corresponding to the N target risk parameters based on the first risk occurrence probability, the second risk occurrence probability, the third risk occurrence probability and the risk size formula;

determining target risk losses corresponding to the N target risk parameters based on the target risk size and the risk loss formula;

and taking the target risk size and the target risk loss as the risk assessment result.

With reference to the first possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the embodiment of the present application, in a second possible implementation manner of the first aspect, the performing loss evaluation based on the M loss parameters includes:

inputting the building house loss parameter, the lifeline system loss parameter, the natural resource asset loss parameter and the production stoppage loss parameter into a loss evaluation model, wherein the loss evaluation model is used for determining direct loss and indirect loss based on the loss parameter, and a building house loss formula, a lifeline system loss formula, a natural resource asset loss formula and a production stoppage loss formula are stored in the loss evaluation model in advance;

determining the target building loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the building loss parameter and the building loss formula;

determining a target lifeline system loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the lifeline system loss parameter and the lifeline system loss formula;

determining a target natural resource asset loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the natural resource asset loss parameter and the natural resource asset loss formula;

obtaining the loss of key equipment and the extra loss, and taking the loss of the target building house, the loss of the target lifeline system, the loss of the target natural resource asset and the sum of the loss of the key equipment and the extra loss as the target direct loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated;

determining a target shutdown loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the shutdown loss parameter and the shutdown loss formula;

acquiring disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction losses, and taking the sum of the target outage loss and the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction losses as a target indirect loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated;

and taking the target direct loss and the target indirect loss as the loss evaluation result.

A second aspect of an embodiment of the present application provides a natural disaster damage evaluation apparatus, including an acquisition unit, a first evaluation unit, a first generation unit, a second evaluation unit, a second generation unit, and an output display unit, wherein:

the acquiring unit is used for acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters;

the first evaluation unit is used for carrying out risk evaluation based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk evaluation result;

the first generating unit is used for generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result;

the second evaluation unit is used for carrying out loss evaluation based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss evaluation result;

the second generating unit is used for generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result;

and the output display unit is used for outputting and displaying the risk assessment report and the loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed.

With reference to the second aspect of the embodiment of the present application, in a first possible implementation manner of the second aspect, in terms of performing risk assessment based on the risk parameter to obtain a risk assessment result, the first assessment unit is specifically configured to:

With reference to the first possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the embodiment of the present application, in a second possible implementation manner of the second aspect, in terms of performing loss evaluation based on the loss parameter to obtain a loss evaluation result, the second evaluation unit is specifically configured to:

A third aspect of embodiments of the present application provides an electronic device, including a processor, a memory, a communication interface, and one or more programs, where the one or more programs are stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, and where the program includes instructions for performing some or all of the steps of the method according to the first aspect of embodiments of the present application.

A fourth aspect of embodiments of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program for electronic data exchange, wherein the computer program causes a computer to perform some or all of the steps described in the method according to the first aspect of embodiments of the present application.

A fifth aspect of embodiments of the present application provides a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a computer program operable to cause a computer to perform some or all of the steps of a method as described in the first aspect of embodiments of the present application. The computer program product may be a software installation package.

It can be seen that, in the embodiment of the application, the natural disaster damage assessment apparatus obtains natural disaster parameters of an area to be assessed, where the natural disaster parameters include risk parameters and damage parameters, performs risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, generates a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result, performs damage assessment based on the damage parameters to obtain a damage assessment result, generates a damage assessment report based on the damage assessment result, and outputs and displays a risk assessment report and a damage assessment report corresponding to a target area to be assessed. Compared with the method for evaluating the natural disaster damage in a manual mode, in the embodiment of the application, the risk evaluation report and the damage evaluation report of the target area to be evaluated are obtained based on the natural disaster parameters of the target area to be evaluated, and the display risk evaluation report and the damage evaluation report are output, so that the natural disaster damage is accurately evaluated.

Drawings

In order to more clearly explain the technical solutions in the embodiments or the background of the present application, the drawings used in the embodiments or the background of the present application will be described below.

Fig. 1A is a schematic flowchart of a natural disaster damage assessment method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

fig. 1B is a schematic diagram of an interface for acquiring natural disaster parameters according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 1C is a schematic illustration of a risk assessment report provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 1D is a schematic illustration of a loss assessment report provided by an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of another natural disaster damage assessment method provided in the embodiment of the present application;

fig. 3 is a block diagram illustrating functional units of a natural disaster damage assessment apparatus according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described below clearly and completely with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.

The terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present application and in the above-described drawings are used for distinguishing between different objects and not for describing a particular order. Furthermore, the terms "include" and "have," as well as any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not limited to only those steps or elements listed, but may alternatively include other steps or elements not listed, or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

Reference in the specification to "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the specification. The appearances of the phrase in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. It is explicitly and implicitly understood by one skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein can be combined with other embodiments.

The natural disaster damage assessment apparatus according to the embodiment of the present application may be integrated in an electronic device, and the electronic device may include various handheld devices, vehicle-mounted devices, wearable devices, computing devices or other processing devices connected to a wireless modem, and various forms of User Equipment (UE), Mobile Stations (MS), terminal devices (terminal device), and the like. For convenience of description, the above-mentioned devices are collectively referred to as electronic devices.

Referring to fig. 1A, fig. 1A is a schematic flow chart of a natural disaster damage assessment method according to an embodiment of the present application, the main execution body of the natural disaster damage assessment method is a natural disaster damage assessment apparatus, and the natural disaster damage assessment method includes steps 101 and 104 as follows:

101: and acquiring natural disaster parameters of the target area to be evaluated, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters.

The risk parameters comprise geological parameters, hydrological parameters and climatic parameters, and the loss parameters comprise building house loss parameters, life line system loss parameters, natural resource asset loss parameters and production stoppage loss parameters. Geology refers to the shape and quality of the land; hydrology refers to various phenomena of water change, movement, and the like in nature; climate refers to the average weather condition of a place for many years; building a house refers to providing an entity that performs life, production, work, or other activities for a user or investor at a planned design site; the lifeline system refers to a project which maintains a city survival function system and has great influence on the national civilization; natural resources assets are the collective term for the natural wealth of various substances that are owned or controlled by a country, expected to bring economic benefits to the country and people, and measurable in currency.

In one possible example, acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated includes:

displaying a tag of a region to be evaluated and an input frame of the region to be evaluated on a display screen of the natural disaster damage evaluation device;

when a first input operation aiming at the input box of the area to be evaluated is detected, acquiring the target area to be evaluated corresponding to the first input operation;

displaying N risk parameter labels and N risk parameter input boxes on the display screen, wherein N is an integer greater than 1;

when second input operation aiming at the N risk parameter input boxes is detected, N target risk parameters corresponding to the second input operation are obtained;

displaying M loss parameter tags and M loss parameter input boxes on the display screen, wherein M is an integer greater than 1;

and when a third input operation aiming at the M loss parameter input boxes is detected, obtaining M target loss parameters corresponding to the third input operation.

The evaluation area label is used for indicating that an evaluation area is input in the evaluation area input box; one risk parameter label corresponds to one risk parameter input box, and the risk parameter label is used for indicating that the risk parameters are input in the corresponding risk parameter input box; one loss parameter label corresponds to one loss parameter input box, and the loss parameter label is used for indicating that the loss parameter is input in the corresponding loss parameter input box.

For example, as shown in fig. 1B, fig. 1B is a schematic diagram of an interface for acquiring natural disaster parameters, where a to-be-evaluated area tag and an to-be-evaluated area input box, 3 risk parameter tags and 3 risk parameter input boxes, and 4 loss parameter tags and 4 loss parameter input boxes are displayed on a display screen of a natural disaster loss evaluation device, where the 3 risk parameter tags include a geological parameter tag, a hydrological parameter tag and a climate parameter tag, the 3 risk parameter input boxes include a geological parameter input box, a hydrological parameter input box and a climate parameter input box, the 4 loss parameter tags include a building loss parameter tag, a lifeline system loss parameter tag, a natural resource asset loss parameter tag and a production stop loss parameter tag, and the 4 loss parameter input boxes include a building loss parameter input box, a lifeline system loss parameter input box, A natural resource asset loss parameter input box and a production outage loss parameter input box.

102: and performing risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, and generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result.

In one possible example, the N target risk parameters include a target geological parameter, a target water reference number, and a target climate parameter, and performing risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, including:

Wherein, the risk size formula is:

P＝A₁×α₁+A₂×α₂+A₃×α₃，

p is the risk size corresponding to the risk parameter, A₁Probability of occurrence of risk corresponding to geological parameter, alpha₁As a weight corresponding to the geological parameter, A₂For the probability of occurrence of risk corresponding to a hydrological parameter, alpha₂Is the weight corresponding to the hydrological parameter, A₃Probability of occurrence of risk corresponding to climate parameter, alpha₃And the weather parameters are weighted correspondingly.

Wherein alpha is₁+α₂+α₃＝1，α₁、α₂And alpha₃The device can be user-defined, and can also be self-defined by a natural disaster damage assessment device.

Wherein the risk loss formula is:

Q＝B×P，

q is the risk loss corresponding to the risk parameter, B is the standard risk loss corresponding to the area to be evaluated, and P is the risk size corresponding to the risk parameter.

In one possible example, generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment results includes:

acquiring a first report name, a first organization name and a first date, and generating a cover of the risk assessment report based on the first report name, the first organization name and the first date;

acquiring first consignor information and first evaluator information, and generating a lining of the risk assessment report based on the first consignor information and the first evaluator information;

acquiring historical geological parameters, historical hydrological parameters, historical climate parameters, a first evaluation principle, a first evaluation basis and a first evaluation conclusion of the target area to be evaluated;

generating primary contents of the risk assessment report based on the target geological parameter, the target hydrological parameter, the target climate parameter, the historical geological parameter, the historical hydrological parameter, the historical climate parameter, the first assessment principle, the first assessment criterion, the target risk size, the target risk loss, and the first assessment conclusion;

composing the risk assessment report based on a front cover of the risk assessment report, a back cover of the risk assessment report, and the main content of the risk assessment report.

Specifically, the embodiment of acquiring the first report name, the first organization name and the first date may be: displaying a first report name tag and a first report name input frame, a first preparation unit name tag and a first preparation unit name input frame, and a first date tag and a first date input frame on a display screen, wherein the first report name tag is used for indicating that a first report name is input in the first report name input frame, the first preparation unit name tag is used for indicating that a first preparation unit name is input in the first preparation unit name input frame, and the first date tag is used for indicating that a first date is input in the first date input frame; when a fourth input operation aiming at the first report name input box, the first preparation unit name input box and the first date input box is detected, a first report name, a first preparation unit name and a first date corresponding to the fourth input operation are acquired.

Specifically, the embodiment of acquiring the first delegator information and the first evaluator information may be: displaying a first consignor information tag, a first consignor information input box, a first evaluator information tag and a first evaluator information input box on a display screen, wherein the first consignor information tag is used for indicating that first consignor information is input in the first consignor information input box, and the first evaluator information tag is used for indicating that first evaluator information is input in the first evaluator information input box; when a fifth input operation aiming at the first consignor information input box and the first evaluator information input box is detected, first consignor information and first evaluator information corresponding to the fifth input operation are acquired.

The first entrustor information comprises an entrustor name and a representative name of a legal person of the entrustor, and the first evaluator information comprises an evaluation unit name, a representative name of a legal person of the evaluation unit, project responsible person information (surname, title and title), technical responsible person information (name, title and title), auditor information (name, title and title) and information of a plurality of participants (name, title and title).

Specifically, the implementation manner of obtaining the historical geological parameters, the historical hydrographic parameters and the historical climate parameters of the target area to be evaluated may be as follows: sending a risk parameter request carrying a target area to be evaluated to a risk parameter platform, wherein the risk parameter request is used for indicating the risk parameter platform to feed back historical geological parameters, historical hydrological parameters and historical climate parameters of the target area to be evaluated; and receiving historical geological parameters, historical hydrological parameters and historical climate parameters of the target area to be evaluated, which are sent by the risk parameter platform according to the risk parameter request.

Specifically, the implementation manner of obtaining the first evaluation principle, the first evaluation criterion, and the first evaluation conclusion of the target area to be evaluated may be as follows: displaying a first evaluation rule tag and a first evaluation rule input box, a first evaluation criterion tag and a first evaluation criterion input box, and a first evaluation conclusion tag and a first evaluation conclusion input box on a display screen, wherein the first evaluation rule tag is used for indicating that a first evaluation rule is input in the first evaluation rule input box, the first evaluation criterion tag is used for indicating that a first evaluation criterion is input in the first evaluation criterion input box, and the first evaluation conclusion tag is used for indicating that a first evaluation conclusion is input in the first evaluation conclusion input box; when a sixth input operation aiming at the first evaluation principle input box, the first evaluation criterion input box and the first evaluation conclusion input box is detected, a first evaluation principle, a first evaluation criterion and a first evaluation conclusion corresponding to the sixth input operation are obtained.

The first evaluation principle comprises a legal compliance principle, an ecological priority principle, a scientific and reasonable principle and an independent objective principle, and the first evaluation criterion comprises identified risks, the progress condition of the project, the quality and the scale of the project and the accuracy and the reliability of data.

For example, as shown in fig. 1C, fig. 1C is a schematic diagram of a risk assessment report, where the risk assessment report includes a front cover, a back cover, and main contents, the front cover includes a first report name, a first organization name, and a first date, the back cover includes information of a first consignor and a first evaluator, and the main contents include a target geological parameter, a target hydrological parameter, a target climate parameter, a historical geological parameter, a historical hydrological parameter, a historical climate parameter, a first assessment principle, a first assessment basis, a target risk size, a target risk loss, and a first assessment conclusion.

103: and performing loss evaluation based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss evaluation result, and generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result.

In one possible example, the M loss parameters include a building house loss parameter, a lifeline system loss parameter, a natural resource asset loss parameter, and a production outage loss parameter, and the loss evaluation is performed based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss evaluation result, including:

The building loss formula is as follows:

D₁for building house loss, i is a part of area number to be evaluated, n parts of area to be evaluated are totally numbered, s is a building house type number, 4 types (residential building, public building, industrial building and agricultural building) are totally numbered, j is a damage level number, k levels are totally numbered, and T is_s(i) For the ith part, the class s floor area, λ, of the area is evaluated_s(i, j) is the destruction ratio of j-level destruction of s-type house in the ith partial evaluation area, B_sIs the unit area cost of the s-type house, eta_s(j) Is the loss ratio of j-class destruction of the s-class house.

Wherein, the lifeline system loss formula is:

D₂for life line system loss, s is life line type number, n types, L_sIs the length of the break of the class s lifeline, B_sFor repairing or resetting class s lifelines, R_sIs a reset unit price of s-type monomer structure eta_sIs the loss ratio of the s-type monomer structure.

Wherein, the natural resource asset loss formula is as follows:

D₄for the loss of natural resource assets, i is the natural resource asset number, N types, j is the physical value number, m types and N_ijLoss of the value of the j-th class of material under the condition of i-class natural resource production, Q_ijThe unit price of the j-th class physical value under the i-class natural resource production.

Wherein, the production stop loss formula is as follows:

I₂＝(B-A)×D，

I₂for the loss of production stoppage, B is the pre-disaster single-day production value of the enterprise, A is the post-disaster single-day production value of the enterprise, and D is the number of production stoppage or production reduction days affected by the enterprise.

Specifically, the implementation method for obtaining the loss of the key device, the extra loss, and the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss may be as follows: displaying a key equipment loss label, a key equipment loss input frame, an extra loss label, an extra loss input frame, a disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss label, a disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss input frame on a display screen, wherein the key equipment loss label is used for indicating that the key equipment loss is input in the key equipment loss input frame, the extra loss label is used for indicating that extra loss is input in the extra loss input frame, and the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss label is used for indicating that the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss is input in the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss input frame; and when a seventh input operation aiming at the loss input frame, the extra loss input frame and the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss input frame of the key equipment is detected, acquiring the loss of the key equipment, the extra loss and the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction loss corresponding to the seventh input operation.

In one possible example, generating a loss assessment report based on the loss assessment results includes:

acquiring a second report name, a second organization unit name and a second date, and generating a cover of the loss evaluation report based on the second report name, the second organization unit name and the second date;

acquiring second consignor information and second evaluator information, and generating a lining of the loss evaluation report based on the second consignor information and the second evaluator information;

acquiring natural disaster information of the target area to be evaluated, influence information of the natural disaster information on a natural resource capitalization project, a second evaluation principle, a second evaluation basis and a second evaluation conclusion;

generating main contents of the damage assessment report based on the natural disaster information, the influence information, the second assessment principle, the second assessment criterion, the target direct damage, the target indirect damage and the second assessment conclusion;

composing the loss assessment report based on a front cover of the loss assessment report, a back cover of the loss assessment report, and a main content of the loss assessment report.

The embodiment of acquiring the second report name, the second preparation unit name, and the second date is the same as the embodiment of acquiring the first report name, the first preparation unit name, and the first date, and will not be described here.

The embodiment of acquiring the second requester information and the second evaluator information is the same as the embodiment of acquiring the first requester information and the first evaluator information, and will not be described here.

The second consignor information comprises a consignment name and a consignor representative name, and the second evaluator information comprises an evaluation unit name, an evaluation unit legal person representative name, project responsible person information (name, job and title), technical responsible person information (name, job and title), auditor information (name, job and title) and information of a plurality of participants (name, job and title).

Specifically, the implementation manner of acquiring the natural disaster information of the target area to be evaluated may be: sending an information request carrying a target area to be evaluated to a natural disaster information platform, wherein the information request is used for indicating the natural disaster information platform to feed back natural disaster information of the target area to be evaluated; and receiving natural disaster information of the target area to be evaluated, which is sent by the natural disaster information platform according to the information request.

The natural resource capitalization refers to a process of designing natural resources into products to be converted into profits when the products enter the market according to related regulation policies, innovative system mechanisms and technical methods in order to promote the value-added of natural resources, and the process comprises the contents of natural resource property right determination, natural resource asset value evaluation accounting, natural resource asset circulation transaction, natural resource asset financial services, natural resource asset capitalization mechanism design and the like.

Specifically, the embodiment of acquiring the influence information of the natural disaster information on the natural resource capitalization project may be: displaying an influence information label and an influence information input box on a display screen, wherein the influence information label is used for indicating that influence information is input in the influence information input box; when an eighth input operation for the influence information input box is detected, influence information of natural disaster information corresponding to the eighth input operation on the natural resource capitalization project is acquired.

The embodiment of obtaining the second evaluation rule, the second evaluation criterion and the second evaluation conclusion is the same as the embodiment of obtaining the first evaluation rule, the first evaluation criterion and the first evaluation conclusion, and will not be described here.

The second evaluation principle is the same as the first evaluation principle, and the second evaluation basis is the same as the first evaluation basis.

For example, as shown in fig. 1D, fig. 1D is a schematic diagram of a damage assessment report, where the damage assessment report includes a front cover, a back cover, and main content, the front cover includes a second report name, a second organization name, and a second date, the back cover includes second consignor information and second evaluator information, and the main content includes natural disaster information, information about influence of the natural disaster information on a natural resource capitalization project, a second assessment principle, a second assessment criterion, a target direct damage, a target indirect damage, and a second assessment conclusion.

104: and outputting and displaying the risk assessment report and the loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed.

According to the embodiment of the invention, a natural disaster damage assessment device obtains natural disaster parameters of an area to be assessed, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters, carries out risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, generates a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result, carries out loss assessment based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss assessment result, generates a loss assessment report based on the loss assessment result, and outputs and displays the risk assessment report and the loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed. Compared with the method for evaluating the natural disaster damage in a manual mode, in the embodiment of the application, the risk evaluation report and the damage evaluation report of the target area to be evaluated are obtained based on the natural disaster parameters of the target area to be evaluated, and the risk evaluation report and the damage evaluation report are output and displayed, so that the natural disaster damage is accurately evaluated.

Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flow chart of another natural disaster damage assessment method according to the embodiment of the present application, the main implementation body of the natural disaster damage assessment method is a natural disaster damage assessment apparatus, and the natural disaster damage assessment method includes

steps

201 and 215, as follows:

201: and acquiring natural disaster parameters of the target area to be evaluated, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters, and the loss parameters comprise building house loss parameters, life line system loss parameters, natural resource asset loss parameters and production stoppage loss parameters.

202: and performing risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, and generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result.

203: inputting the building house loss parameter, the lifeline system loss parameter, the natural resource asset loss parameter and the production stoppage loss parameter into a loss evaluation model, wherein the loss evaluation model is used for determining direct loss and indirect loss based on the loss parameter, and the loss evaluation model stores a building house loss formula, a lifeline system loss formula, a natural resource asset loss formula and a production stoppage loss formula in advance.

204: and determining the target building loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the building loss parameter and the building loss formula.

205: and determining the target lifeline system loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the lifeline system loss parameter and the lifeline system loss formula.

206: and determining the target natural resource asset loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the natural resource asset loss parameter and the natural resource asset loss formula.

207: and obtaining the loss of key equipment and the extra loss, and taking the loss of the target building house, the loss of the target lifeline system, the loss of the target natural resource asset and the sum of the loss of the key equipment and the extra loss as the target direct loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated.

208: and determining the target production stopping loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated based on the production stopping loss parameter and the production stopping loss formula.

209: and acquiring disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction losses, and taking the sum of the target outage loss and the disaster relief and post-disaster reconstruction losses as a target indirect loss corresponding to the target area to be evaluated.

210: and taking the target direct loss and the target indirect loss as loss evaluation results.

211: and acquiring a second report name, a second organization unit name and a second date, and generating a cover of the loss evaluation report based on the second report name, the second organization unit name and the second date.

212: and acquiring second consignor information and second evaluator information, and generating a lining of the loss evaluation report based on the second consignor information and the second evaluator information.

213: acquiring natural disaster information of the target area to be evaluated, influence information of the natural disaster information on a natural resource capitalization project, a second evaluation principle, a second evaluation basis and a second evaluation conclusion, and generating main contents of the loss evaluation report based on the natural disaster information, the influence information, the second evaluation principle, the second evaluation basis, the target direct loss, the target indirect loss and the second evaluation conclusion.

214: composing the loss assessment report based on a front cover of the loss assessment report, a back cover of the loss assessment report, and a main content of the loss assessment report.

215: and outputting and displaying the risk assessment report and the loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed.

It should be noted that, for the specific implementation of the steps of the method shown in fig. 2, reference may be made to the specific implementation described in the above method, and a description thereof is omitted here.

Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a block diagram illustrating functional units of a natural disaster damage assessment apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application, where the natural disaster damage assessment apparatus 300 includes an obtaining unit 301, a first assessment unit 302, a first generation unit 303, a second assessment unit 304, a second generation unit 305, and an output display unit 306, where:

an obtaining unit 301, configured to obtain natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, where the natural disaster parameters include a risk parameter and a loss parameter;

a first evaluation unit 302, configured to perform risk evaluation based on the risk parameter to obtain a risk evaluation result;

a first generating unit 303, configured to generate a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result;

a second evaluation unit 304, configured to perform loss evaluation based on the loss parameter to obtain a loss evaluation result;

a second generating unit 305 for generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result;

and an output display unit 306, configured to output and display the risk assessment report and the loss assessment report corresponding to the target area to be assessed.

In one possible example, in terms of acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, the acquiring unit 301 is specifically configured to:

In a possible example, in terms of performing risk assessment based on the risk parameter to obtain a risk assessment result, the first assessment unit 302 is specifically configured to:

In one possible example, in terms of generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result, the first generating unit 303 is specifically configured to:

In a possible example, in terms of performing loss evaluation based on the loss parameter to obtain a loss evaluation result, the second evaluation unit 304 is specifically configured to:

In one possible example, in terms of generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result, the second generating unit 305 is specifically configured to:

Consistent with the embodiments shown in fig. 1A and fig. 2, please refer to fig. 4, fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application, where the electronic device 400 includes a processor, a memory, a communication interface, and one or more programs, the one or more programs are stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, and the programs include instructions for:

It can be seen that, in the embodiment of the application, the electronic device obtains natural disaster parameters of an area to be evaluated, where the natural disaster parameters include risk parameters and loss parameters, performs risk evaluation based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk evaluation result, generates a risk evaluation report based on the risk evaluation result, performs loss evaluation based on the loss parameters to obtain a loss evaluation result, generates a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result, and outputs and displays the risk evaluation report and the loss evaluation report corresponding to the target area to be evaluated. Compared with the method for evaluating the natural disaster damage in a manual mode, in the embodiment of the application, the risk evaluation report and the damage evaluation report of the target area to be evaluated are obtained based on the natural disaster parameters of the target area to be evaluated, and the risk evaluation report and the damage evaluation report are output and displayed, so that the natural disaster damage is accurately evaluated.

In one possible example, in obtaining natural disaster parameters of a target area to be assessed, the program comprises instructions specifically for performing the following steps:

In one possible example, in terms of performing a risk assessment based on the risk parameter, resulting in a risk assessment result, the program includes instructions specifically for performing the steps of:

In one possible example, in generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment results, the program includes instructions specifically for performing the steps of:

In one possible example, the program comprises instructions for performing the following steps in particular, in terms of performing a loss evaluation based on the loss parameter, resulting in a loss evaluation result:

In one possible example, the program includes instructions, in generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation result, specifically for performing the steps of:

Embodiments of the present application further provide a computer storage medium for storing a computer program for electronic data exchange, where the computer program enables a computer to execute part or all of the steps of any one of the methods described in the above method embodiments, and the computer includes an electronic device.

Embodiments of the present application also provide a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a computer program operable to cause a computer to perform some or all of the steps of any of the methods as described in the above method embodiments. The computer program product may be a software installation package, the computer comprising electronic equipment.

It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the above-mentioned method embodiments are described as a series of acts or combination of acts, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the present application is not limited by the order of acts described, as some steps may occur in other orders or concurrently depending on the application. Further, those skilled in the art should also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are preferred embodiments and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required in this application.

In the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.

In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus may be implemented in other ways. For example, the above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the above-described division of units is merely a logical division, and an actual implementation may have another division, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may be in an electrical or other form.

The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.

In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.

The integrated unit may be stored in a computer readable memory if it is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be substantially implemented or contributed to by the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution may be embodied in a software product, which is stored in a memory and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method described in the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned memory comprises: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic or optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps in the methods of the above embodiments may be implemented by associated hardware instructed by a program, which may be stored in a computer readable memory, which may include: flash Memory disks, Read-Only memories (ROMs), Random Access Memories (RAMs), magnetic disks, optical disks, and the like.

The foregoing detailed description of the embodiments of the present application has been presented to illustrate the principles and implementations of the present application, and the above description of the embodiments is only provided to help understand the methods and their core ideas of the present application; meanwhile, for a person skilled in the art, according to the idea of the present application, there may be variations in the specific implementation and application scope, and in view of the above, the content of the present specification should not be construed as a limitation to the present application.

Claims

1. A natural disaster damage assessment method, the method comprising:

acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, wherein the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters, the risk parameters comprise target geological parameters, target hydrological parameters and target climate parameters, the geology refers to the shape and the quality of the land, the hydrology refers to various phenomena of water change and movement in the nature, the climate refers to the weather average condition of a place for many years, and the loss parameters comprise building house loss parameters, life line system loss parameters, natural resource asset loss parameters and production halt loss parameters;

performing risk assessment based on the target geological parameters, the target hydrological parameters and the target climate parameters to obtain a risk assessment result, and generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment result;

wherein the building house loss formula is as follows:

D₁for the loss of the building, i is the number of part of areas to be evaluated, n parts of areas to be evaluated are totally counted, s is the number of the types of the buildings, 4 types of residential buildings, public buildings, industrial buildings and agricultural buildings are totally counted, j is the number of damage grades, k grades are totally counted, and T is the number of the types of the buildings_s(i) For the ith part, the class s floor area, λ, of the area is evaluated_s(i, j) is the destruction ratio of j-level destruction of s-type house in the ith partial evaluation area, B_sIs the unit area cost of the s-type house, eta_s(j) The loss ratio of j-level destruction of the s-type houses;

the lifeline system loss formula is:

D₂for the lifeline system loss, s is lifeline type number, n types, L_sIs the destruction length of the class s lifeline, B_sFor repairing or resetting class s lifelines, R_sIs a reset unit price of s-type monomer structure eta_sIs the loss ratio of s-type monomer structure;

the natural resource asset loss formula is:

D₄for the natural resource asset loss, i is the natural resource asset number, N types in total, j is the physical value number, m types in total, and N_ijLoss of the value of the j-th class of material under the condition of i-class natural resource production, Q_ijThe unit price of the j-th class physical value under the i-class natural resource production;

the production stoppage loss formula is as follows:

I₂＝(B-A)×D，

I₂for the outage loss, B is the pre-disaster single-day production value of the enterprise, A is the post-disaster single-day production value of the enterprise, and D is the number of outage or production reduction days affected by the enterprise;

taking the target direct loss and the target indirect loss as loss evaluation results, and generating a loss evaluation report based on the loss evaluation results;

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the obtaining natural disaster parameters of the target area to be evaluated comprises:

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the N target risk parameters include a target geological parameter, a target hydrological parameter, and a target climate parameter, and wherein performing a risk assessment based on the risk parameters to obtain a risk assessment result comprises:

inputting the target geological parameter, the target hydrological parameter and the target climate parameter into a risk assessment model, wherein the risk assessment model is used for determining risk size and risk loss based on the risk parameter, and the risk assessment model stores a mapping relation between geological parameters and risk occurrence probability, a mapping relation between hydrological parameters and risk occurrence probability, a mapping relation between climate parameters and risk occurrence probability, a risk size formula and a risk loss formula in advance;

4. The method of claim 3, wherein generating a risk assessment report based on the risk assessment results comprises:

acquiring a first report name, a first compilation unit name and a first date, and generating a cover of the risk assessment report based on the first report name, the first compilation unit name and the first date;

generating primary content of the risk assessment report based on the target geological parameter, the target hydrological parameter, the target climate parameter, the historical geological parameter, the historical hydrological parameter, the historical climate parameter, the first assessment principle, the first assessment criterion, the target risk size, the target risk loss, and the first assessment conclusion;

5. The method of claim 1, wherein generating a loss assessment report based on the loss assessment results comprises:

6. A natural disaster damage evaluation apparatus, comprising an acquisition unit, a first evaluation unit, a first generation unit, a second evaluation unit, a second generation unit, and an output display unit, wherein:

the system comprises an acquisition unit, a storage unit and a processing unit, wherein the acquisition unit is used for acquiring natural disaster parameters of a target area to be evaluated, the natural disaster parameters comprise risk parameters and loss parameters, the risk parameters comprise target geological parameters, target hydrological parameters and target climate parameters, the geology refers to the shape and the quality of the land, the hydrology refers to various phenomena of water change and movement in the nature, the climate refers to the weather average condition of a place for many years, and the loss parameters comprise building house loss parameters, life line system loss parameters, natural resource asset loss parameters and production stoppage loss parameters;

the first evaluation unit is used for carrying out risk evaluation on the basis of the target geological parameter, the target hydrological parameter and the target climate parameter to obtain a risk evaluation result;

the second evaluation unit is configured to: inputting the building house loss parameter, the lifeline system loss parameter, the natural resource asset loss parameter and the production stoppage loss parameter into a loss evaluation model, wherein the loss evaluation model is used for determining direct loss and indirect loss based on the loss parameter, and a building house loss formula, a lifeline system loss formula, a natural resource asset loss formula and a production stoppage loss formula are stored in the loss evaluation model in advance;

wherein the building house loss formula is as follows:

the lifeline system loss formula is:

the natural resource asset loss formula is:

the production stoppage loss formula is as follows:

I₂＝(B-A)×D，

taking the target direct loss and the target indirect loss as loss assessment results;

7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein, in obtaining the natural disaster parameter of the target area to be evaluated, the obtaining unit is specifically configured to:

8. An electronic device comprising a processor, a memory, a communication interface, and one or more programs stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, the programs comprising instructions for performing some or all of the steps of the method of any of claims 1-5.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium is used to store a computer program, which is executed by a processor to implement the method according to any of claims 1-5.