CN110136784A - The component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention discloses the component evaluation assessments of building material product health hazard, comprising the following steps: S1, to from air route of exposure to human health there are risk endanger type and rating information carries out summarizing the health hazard classification for generating chemicals and classification aggregation table；S2, the health hazard label scaling criterion of chemicals is formulated referring concurrently to Chemicals Database and/or Chemical Safety Data Sheet by the way of color identifier with classification aggregation table according to the health hazard degree and classification of the chemicals；S3, the ingredient names and each component content information for obtaining building material product；Health hazard classification and the rating information of component are obtained in the health hazard classification of S4, chemically product database and/or Chemical Safety Data Sheet and/or mixture and classification computation rule, and the health hazard size of the component according to the health hazard label scaling criterion color identifier of the chemicals, formulate the health hazard label of the component.

Description

The component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard

Technical field

The present invention relates to the detection of the harmful substance of building material product or the technical fields of characterization, and in particular to a kind of building material product The component evaluation assessment of health hazard.

Background technique

Currently, China's real estate rapidly develops, the evaluation of indoor air quality is just becoming focal issue concerned by people One of.

Since the last century 70's, as organic synthesis material is widely used in interior decoration, directly result in In house, volatile organic compounds (VOC) especially in New Dwelling is largely distributed in architecture indoor space, this is greatly It is degrading architecture indoor air quality.In addition, needing in energy conservation, modern architecture airtightness is more and more stronger, this gives indoor outer space Gas exchange circulation causes great obstruction.

Wherein, VOC is the english abbreviation of volatile organic compounds (volatile organic compounds), herein Using boiling point as judgment basis, organic compound of all boiling points not higher than 280 DEG C belongs to VOC scope.

The prior art is often detected using by experiment, the concentration or burst size of test target hazardous substance, with detection The size of result value characterizes the superiority and inferiority of building material product environmental-protecting performance, and such method can bring following disadvantage:

(1) the harm ingredient of careless mistake is limited, only focuses on hazardous substance related with national standard or professional standard, limitation Target hazardous substance in detection means；

(2) existing method is that the poisonous and harmful substance data of product are obtained by the means of detection, for a production Product, harmful substance size can be according to determination method, experimenter, rules of origin (batch, production technology), experimental situation Etc. factors and change；

(3) harmful substance and its content size can only be informed, consumer can not directly obtain the danger of health possessed by product Evil type and the size respectively endangered.

Summary of the invention

The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of component evaluation assessments of building material product health hazard, and in particular to a kind of from health The method that angle goes the evaluation building material product feature of environmental protection is endangered, the method for the present invention can solve the above problems, and from the angle of health hazard It spends and provides selection support to consumer.

Component evaluation assessment does health hazard analysis from the component of product, each in positioning product has health danger The harm label of evil component.This method is suitable for all building material products, is particularly suitable for occur in production or use process The product of chemical reaction.

The component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard, comprising the following steps:

S1, it is contacted from the angle contacted with air according to chemicals classification and risk publicity general rule to from air There are the harm types and rating information of risk to summarize to human health for approach, generate chemicals health hazard classification with It is classified aggregation table；

S2, according to the health hazard degree of the chemicals and classification and classification aggregation table, referring concurrently to chemicals data By the way of color identifier, the health hazard label calibration for formulating chemicals is quasi- for library and/or Chemical Safety Data Sheet Then；

The content information of S3, the ingredient names for obtaining building material product and each component；

If S4, described group be divided into pure substance, need to be from the Chemicals Database and/or the chemical producting safety technology explanation Health hazard classification and the rating information of the pure substance are obtained in book, and are demarcated according to the health hazard label of the chemicals The health hazard size of pure substance described in criterion color identifier formulates the health hazard label of the pure substance；

Or,

If described group is divided into mixture, need to by the health hazard of the mixture classify be classified computation rule and/or The Chemicals Database and/or the Chemical Safety Data Sheet obtain the health hazard classification of the mixture and divide Grade information, and the health hazard of the mixture according to the health hazard label scaling criterion color identifier of the chemicals is big It is small, formulate the health hazard label of the mixture.

Preferably, in the step S1:

It is described from air route of exposure to human health there are the harm type of risk be carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction Cell mutagenicity, acute toxicity, serious eye injury/Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation, breathing/skin allergy, primary contact Specific target organ toxicity, the specific target organ toxicity that contacts repeatedly.

Further, it is preferable that in the step S1:

S111, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenicity are classified as group 1, and according to health hazard degree pair Health hazard in group 1 is successively labeled with red, two kinds of colors of yellow；

S112, by acute toxicity, serious eye injury/Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation and breathing/skin allergy, once connect The specific target organ toxicity of touching, the specific target organ toxicity contacted repeatedly are classified as group 2, and according to health hazard degree pair Health hazard in group 2 is successively labeled with red, two kinds of colors of yellow.

Preferably, the health hazard label scaling criterion of the chemicals are as follows:

S21, when the component has the health hazard of group 1 and/or group 2, need to be selected according to " harm is tended towards superiority " principle It selects hazard rating clearly and the highest compromise data of grade is as judgment basis；

S22, when navigating to the component in the Chemicals Database and the Chemical Safety Data Sheet When endangering classification for group 1, but the hazard rating of the component can not be navigated to, then to the health hazard grade mark of the component Note is shortage of data, and indicates that it endangers risk with red, i.e. red-shortage of data；

And/or

When the harm for navigating to the component in the Chemicals Database and the Chemical Safety Data Sheet Classification is group 2, but when can not navigate to the hazard rating of the component, is then labeled as to the health hazard grade of the component Shortage of data, and indicate that it endangers risk with yellow, i.e. yellow-shortage of data；

S23, it is positioned less than described group when in the Chemicals Database and the Chemical Safety Data Sheet Timesharing, and health hazard information is unknown, is marked at this time to the health hazard of the component using blank.

Preferably, in the step S21:

The red expression health hazard is relatively high, should be avoided in formula and the substance occurs；

The yellow indicates health hazard rather moderate, allows to occur in formula, but should find safer substitute Matter；

The green indicates that health hazard is relatively low, is the safe substance of comparison；

The blank mark indicates that health hazard is unknown, can not determine that it endangers size.

Preferably, in the step S3:

From the approach contacted with air, the constituent for the building material product for needing to carry out health hazard assessment is carried out Screening, determines the component evaluated.

Preferably, in the step S4, health hazard classification and the classification computation rule of the mixture are as follows:

If S411, described mixture itself have been determined the test of its toxicity, according to obtained experimental data and change The health hazard grade scale of product is classified and is classified；

If S412, the mixture are without the whole test data that can use its determining toxicity, according to bridge formation principle pair The health hazard of mixture is classified and is classified；

S413, when the bridge formation principle is not applicable, then need to be classified according to the health hazard of component each in mixture Come to carry out harm classification and classification to the mixture with ranked data.

Preferably, in the step S4:

S421, when the component have group 1 health hazard when, need to be according to the health hazard label mark of the chemicals It fixes, to identify the health hazard of the component；

Or,

When the component only has the health hazard of group 2, need to be demarcated according to the health hazard label of the chemicals Criterion identifies the health hazard of the chemicals.

Preferably, in the step S4, the Chemicals Database, comprising:

Hazardous chemical catalogue and/or international cancer research institution, World Health Organization carcinogenic substance inventory and/or California 65 Number motion chemical substance inventory and/or label and Package Ordinances-attachment VI.

Preferably, the representation method of the building material product health hazard label are as follows:

The health hazard of component each in building material product is marked with default label color；

Or,

With the component distribution situation of identical health hazard label in content mark building material product.

Technical solution provided by the invention is as follows:

In conclusion the present invention provides a kind of component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard, may be implemented following beneficial Effect:

1, method range of value provided by the invention is more extensive, the institute that can be introduced to additions all in building material product or indirectly There is component to be evaluated, the target hazardous substance being not limited in detection means.

2, method provided by the invention can embody specific health hazard, endanger component or substance for any, can be from it It the health hazard type that has and endangers size and identifies, can be truly realized hazardous substance is corresponding with human health.

3, the present invention is in order to allow ordinary consumer to better understand the feature of environmental protection of bought product, using three kinds of red, yellow, and green Hazard rating mark is simple, intuitive, eye-catching, quickly can identify and be perceived.

4, method evaluation result provided by the invention is reproducible, more preferably reliably, is produced except non-product changes raw material Product upgrade (can re-start hazard assessment at this time), and evaluation result will not change because of batch, production technology, environmental factor etc. Become, more reliability.

5, method provided by the invention can carry out Health hazard assessments to each component of building material product, and identify it Health hazard label can be replaced red or yellow substance for the formulator of product from formula design end, do It is not introduced to source, to design really green and healthy product, there is certain scientific research directive significance.

Specific embodiment

In order to more clearly explain the embodiment of the invention or the technical proposal in the existing technology, table explanation will be compareed below A specific embodiment of the invention.It should be evident that the embodiment in being described below is only some embodiments of the present invention, it is right For those of ordinary skill in the art, without creative efforts, it can also obtain according to these embodiments Other embodiments.

Component evaluation assessment does health hazard analysis from the component of product, each in positioning product has health danger The harm label of evil component.This method is more suitable for the product that will not chemically react in production or use process.

Embodiment 1

The component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard, comprising the following steps:

S1, it selects from the angle contacted with air according to " chemicals classification and risk publicity general rule " from air There are the harm types of certain risk to human health for route of exposure；And according to the grade scale (GB of different health hazards 30000.18-2013~GB 30000.26-2013), generate health hazard classification and the classification aggregation table of chemicals；

S2, according to the health hazard degree of chemicals and classification and classification aggregation table, referring concurrently to Chemicals Database and/ Or Chemical Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), by the way of color identifier, the health hazard label calibration for formulating chemicals is quasi- Then；

S3, the ingredient names and each component content information, including raw material, chemical reaction product etc. for obtaining building material product；

If S4, group are divided into pure substance, need to obtain in chemically product database and/or safe practice specification (MSDS) pure The health hazard classification of object and rating information, and according to the health hazard label scaling criterion color identifier pure substance of chemicals Health hazard size, formulate the health hazard label of pure substance；

Or,

If group is divided into mixture, it need to be classified by the health hazard of mixture and be classified computation rule and/or chemicals peace Full technical specification (MSDS) and/or Chemicals Database obtain health hazard classification and the rating information of mixture, and according to The health hazard size of the health hazard label scaling criterion color identifier mixture of chemicals formulates the health danger of mixture Evil label.

In the present embodiment, method provided by the invention can be to all components added or introduce indirectly all in building material product It is evaluated, endangers component or substance for any, understand the health hazard type that have from it and endanger size identifying, it can It is truly realized hazardous substance is corresponding with human health；It is identified using color as hazard rating, makes ordinary consumer more preferable The bought product of understanding the feature of environmental protection, it is simple, intuitive, eye-catching, can quickly identify；And method provided by the invention, unless Product changes raw material and carries out product up-gradation (can re-start hazard assessment at this time), and evaluation result will not be because of batch, production Technique, environmental factor etc. and change, more reliability.

Embodiment 2

This specific embodiment discloses the class categories of chemicals in embodiment 1.

It is carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell there are the harm type of risk to human health from air route of exposure Mutagenicity, acute toxicity, serious eye injury/Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation, breathing/skin allergy, specific target organ Toxicity (primary contact), specific target organ toxicity (contacting repeatedly).

In the present embodiment, according to GB 13690-2009 " chemicals classification and risk publicity general rule ", the health of chemicals Danger is divided into 10 classifications, be respectively as follows: carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenicity, acute toxicity, serious eye injury/ Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation, breathing/skin allergy, specific target organ toxicity (primary contact), specific target organ poison Property (repeatedly contact), sucking risk.

Wherein, according to definition, suck risk be liquid or solid chemical be directly entered by oral cavity or nasal cavity or because Vomiting enters tracheae and lower respiratory system indirectly, causes death etc. after chemical pneumonia, different degrees of injury of lungs or sucking tight Weight acute effect.From the angle contacted with air, it is not belonging to the harm classification for needing to be concerned, therefore do not examine herein Amount.

Specifically, in step S1:

S111, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenicity are classified as group 1, and according to health hazard degree pair Health hazard in group 1 is successively labeled with two kinds of red (Red), yellow (Yellow) colors；

S112, by acute toxicity, serious eye injury/Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation and breathing/skin allergy, once connect The specific target organ toxicity of touching, the specific target organ toxicity contacted repeatedly are classified as group 2, and according to health hazard degree pair Health hazard in group 2 is successively labeled with two kinds of red (Red), yellow (Yellow) colors.

The health hazard degree of group 1 is greater than group 2.

In the present embodiment, from the angle contacted with air, referring concurrently to GB 13690-2009 " chemicals classification and Risk publicity general rule ", the health hazard of chemicals is classified and is divided into 2 classes according to its degree of danger, wherein group 1 represents most strong Health harm influence is maximum, and group 2, which represents health hazard, to be influenced generally.

It is made according to the grade scale (GB 30000.18-2013~GB 30000.26-2013) of different health hazards " health hazard of chemicals classification and classification aggregation table " as shown in table 1:

Table 1

Specifically, Chemicals Database includes:

" hazardous chemical catalogue ", " international cancer research institution, World Health Organization carcinogenic substance inventory ", " California 65 mentions Case chemical substance inventory ", " the newest highest attention surrounding material of REACH " and " REACH regulation limit list of substances-REACH it is attached Part Ⅹ VII ", " EU chemicals classification, label and Package Ordinances-attachment VI " or other are related with chemicals health hazard Database.Database Lists are as shown in table 2:

Table 2

Specifically, the health hazard label scaling criterion of chemicals are as follows:

S21, when component has the health hazard of group 1 and/or group 2, danger need to be selected according to " harm is tended towards superiority " principle Evil classification is clear and the highest compromise data of grade is as judgment basis；

S22, when the harm class for navigating to component in Chemicals Database and Chemical Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Not Wei group 1, but when can not navigate to the hazard rating of component, then shortage of data is labeled as to the health hazard grade of component (Data Gap, DG), and indicate that it endangers risk with red, i.e. red-shortage of data (Red-DG)；

And/or

When the harm classification for navigating to component in Chemicals Database and Chemical Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is Group 2, but when can not navigate to the hazard rating of component, then shortage of data (Data is labeled as to the health hazard grade of component Gap, DG), and indicate that it endangers risk with yellow, i.e. yellow-shortage of data (Yellow-DG).

S23, when in the physical security technical specification (MSDS) in Chemicals Database and chemicals positioning less than group Timesharing, and health hazard information is unknown, is marked at this time to the health hazard of component using blank.

The harm label scaling criterion of group 1 is as shown in table 3:

Table 3

The harm label scaling criterion of group 2 is as shown in table 4:

Table 4

Wherein: red indicates that health hazard is relatively high, should be avoided in formula and the substance occurs；Yellow indicates health danger Rather moderate is done harm to, allows to occur in formula, but safer substitute materials should be found；Green indicates health hazard relatively It is low, it is the safe substance of comparison；Blank mark indicates that health hazard is unknown, can not determine that it endangers size.

In the present embodiment, in the health hazard assessment rules of chemicals, it is necessary to follow two principles:

It endangers type to tend towards superiority principle: when there are in group 1 (carcinogenicity, genotoxicity or cell mutagenicity) for chemicals When any compromise data, then the label that endangers of the chemicals endangers harm label decision rule pointed by type according to group 1.

Hazard rating is tended towards superiority principle: for any health hazard, selecting the highest data of hazard rating as the chemicals Health hazard label judgment basis.

When chemicals has the harm in group 1 (carcinogenicity, genotoxicity or reproduction cell mutagenicity):

It (1) must be with reference to the carcinogenicity in all databases and MSDS that table 2 is listed, genotoxicity, reproduction cell Mutagenicity information；

(2) it when indefinite to carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, the classification of reproduction cell mutagenicity in a certain database, then uses " DG " identifies the hazard rating (DG=Data Gap) in the database；

(3) principle of " harm is tended towards superiority " is followed, it may be assumed that

As long as A, having any database to identify the chemicals has carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenicity, Assert the chemicals, there are corresponding health hazard risks；

B, when multiple Database Identifications chemicals has carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenicity risk, It selects hazard rating clearly and the highest data of grade is as the carcinogenicity of the chemicals, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenesis Property data.

The revision of DG:

When a certain health hazard in group 1 can not be classified, hazard rating, the entirety of the chemicals are marked with DG at this time Label is Red-DG.

When chemicals has the health hazard of group 2:

It (1) must be with reference to hazardous chemical catalogue, EU CLP-Annex VI CMRs inventory and the MSDS that table 2 is listed In compromise data；

Remarks: the hazard rating in these three types of databases is identical, therefore can not have to basis when carrying out and endangering label calibration Database distinguishes.

(2) when indefinite to hazard rating in a certain database, then the hazard rating in the database is identified with " DG " (DG=Data Gap)；

(3) principle of " harm is tended towards superiority " is followed, it may be assumed that

As long as A, there is any database to identify the chemicals with health hazard, assert that the chemicals has corresponding health Endanger risk；

B, when multiple Database Identifications chemicals has a certain health hazard, select hazard rating clear and grade most Data information of the high data as the health hazard.

The revision of DG:

When a certain health hazard in group 2 can not be classified, hazard rating, the entirety of the chemicals are marked with DG at this time Label is Yellow-DG.

Red-DG indicates that health hazard label may be biased to Yellow or Green on the basis of Red, but currently without definite Data determined；Yellow-DG indicates that health hazard label may be biased to Green on the basis of Yellow, but does not have at present There are exact data to be determined.

When health hazard is not present in chemicals:

(1) it if the chemicals can be found in the database and MSDS of table 2, only (is for example good for there is no health hazard Health harm is not classified, temporarily without health hazard data etc.), the harm label of the chemicals is green (Green) at this time；

(2) if the chemicals can not find in the database and MSDS of table 2, need to follow following principle at this time:

A, rule of thumb judge, which is not belonging to health hazard product, and for example water itself is not belonging to the object to health hazard Matter, therefore can directly be determined as green (Green), for another example titanium dioxide, no longer exist after in conjunction with coating with powder, It is negligible by air route of exposure healthhazard at this time, i.e., health hazard label is green (Green)；

B, in addition, when can not rule of thumb judge some chemicals, then the chemicals itself is labeled as blank, table at this time Show that its health hazard is uncertain, it is understood that there may be control unknown risks.

In the present embodiment, it, which is not one determining as a result, can be according to follow-up data, is indicated to chemicals mark DG It supplements and perfect, returns in table 3 or 4.

Embodiment 3

This specific embodiment discloses in the step S3 in embodiment 1:

From air route of exposure, the constituent for needing the building material product for carrying out health hazard assessment is sieved Choosing determines the component, including raw material, chemical reaction product etc. evaluated.

Embodiment 4

This specific embodiment is on the basis of embodiment 1 defined the health hazard classification of mixture, step S4 In, health hazard classification and the classification computation rule of mixture:

If S411, mixture itself have been determined the test of its toxicity, according to obtained experimental data and chemicals Health hazard grade scale classified and be classified；

If S412, mixture are without the whole test data that can use its determining toxicity, according to bridge formation principle to mixing The health hazard of object is classified and is classified；

S413, when bridge formation principle is not applicable, then need to be classified according to the health hazard of component each in mixture and point Grade data to carry out harm classification and classification to mixture.

In the present embodiment, bridge formation principle is if do not tested mixture itself, but to single group of mixture Divide or the data of proof similar mixtures have sufficiently been grasped, it is sufficient to the hazard property of the mixture is suitably determined, So these data will be used according to following agreed bridge formation principle.This can ensure that assorting process uses available data as much as possible The hazard property of mixture is determined, without carrying out appended experimental to animal.Bridge formation principle includes:

(1) it dilutes

If the mixture for doing overtesting is diluted with diluent, the toxicity category and original components Poisoning of diluent Minimum is equal or lower than it, and the diluent will not influence corrosivity/irritation of other components, then diluted new Mixture can divide into and the original rank that do the mixture of overtesting equal.

(2) product batches

Mixture had made a production batch of toxicity test, it is believed that actually with same manufacturer production or The toxicity of another untested product batches of the same commercial product produced at the control is identical, unless having reason to recognize For the toxicity of not test (N.T.) product batches has significant change.If latter situation occurs, need to carry out new classification.

(3) concentration of high toxicity mixture

The mixture for having made overtesting is divided into classification 1, if the concentration of component for belonging to classification 1 in the mixture increases, Then obtained untested mixture still divides classification 1 into, without being separately tested.

(4) same toxicity classification interpolation

Three kinds of identical mixtures of component (A, B and C), mixture A and mixture B belong to same toxicity by test Classification, and mixture C is not after tested, but contains the active component of toxicology identical as mixture A and mixture B, and its activity The concentration of component and the concentration in mixture A and mixture B are very close, then mixture C should belong to same rank with A and B.

(5) substantially like mixture

It is assumed that following situations:

A. two kinds of mixtures: 1. A+B；②C+B

B. the concentration of component B is essentially identical in two kinds of mixtures；

C. mixture 1. in component A concentration be equal to mixture 2. in component C concentration；

D. the toxicity data of known A and C, and these data are substantially the same, i.e., and they belong to the identical class of risk, And the toxicity of B may not be influenced.

If 1. or 2. mixture has been classified according to test data, another mixture can turn to identical danger Rank.

(6) aerosol

Toxicity when if the propellant being added has no effect on mixture by spraying, the mixing of this aerosol form Object oral and the class of risk identical with the mixture of the tested non-aerosol state of industry can be divided into through dermal toxicity.Wherein The toxicity on inhalation classification of aerosol class should individually consider.As shown in table 5: table 5 is the different bridge formation principle applicabilities for endangering type Aggregation table.

Table 5

When bridge formation principle is not applicable, then the health hazard classification and ranked data according to component each in mixture are needed (GB 30000.18-2013~GB30000.26-2013) to carry out harm classification and classification to mixture, and difference endangers classification Computation rule it is different, it is specific as follows.

1, acute toxicity

(1) all components have data available in mixture

To ensure that mixture classification is accurate, and ensure that all systems, department and classification only need to be calculated once, it should be by The acute toxicity estimated value (ATE) of component is calculated according to following factor:

A. there is the component for the known acute toxicity for belonging to any acute toxicity classification of homogeneous classification method, which should receive Enter to calculate；

B. the not no component (such as water, sugar) of acute toxicity, which should not be included in calculating；

C. if the factor should not be included in meter when the data grasped are tested from threshold dose and do not show acute toxicity It calculates.

Belong to the component of this segment limit, it is believed that be component known to acute toxicity estimated value (ATE).How following etc. 1. or 2. given data is correctly applied in formula, the annotation b and following formula for being shown in Table 1.

1. according to following formula, by calculating the ATE value of all related components, come determine mixture it is oral, through skin Or the ATEmix of toxicity on inhalation,

(2) one or more components of mixture do not have data available

A, the individual components of mixture do not have ATE, but obtained following message can be used for exporting scaled value, then can apply Formula is 1..Specifically include following situations:

A. oral, through the extrapolation between skin and sucking acute toxicity estimated value.Such assessment may need appropriate Pharmacodynamic Data and pharmacokinetic data；

B. human contact's evidence is marked with poisonous effect, but without providing lethal dose data；

C. the evidence obtained in other toxicity test/analyses shows that substance has acute poison effect, but not necessarily mentions For lethal dose data evidence；

D. pass through structure-activity relation from the extremely similar resulting data of substance.

This method usually requires a large amount of complementary technology information, it is also desirable to have one to do some training very often, is veteran special Family, could reliably estimate acute toxicity.If needing to be assessed according to following without such information.

It, can if B, there is the information that concentration is useful without any pair of hazard rating not less than 1% component in mixture Infer the lopsided estimated value that the mixture does not determine.In this case, it should only mixture be carried out according to main constituent Classification, and in addition illustrate, the x% of mixture is grouped as by the unknown group of toxicity.

It, should be using formula 1. if C, the unknown component total concentration of acute toxicity is not more than 10%.If toxicity is not When the component total concentration known is greater than 10%, then should 2. be calculated according to formula:

2, skin corrosion/irritation

Skin corrosion/irritation harm classification of mixture is other than application bridge formation principle, mainly with critical value/concentration The application of limit value, the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture are specific as shown in table 6: table 6 is mixing Skin corrosion/irritating critical value/concentration limit principle of object.

Table 6

The chemical component of partial skin harmfulness, including acid, alkali, inorganic salts, aldehydes, phenol and interfacial activity Agent will judge the whole harm of its mixture then with concentration limit or pH value, and specific rules are as shown in table 7: table 7 is mixture Skin corrosion/other irritating determination methods.

Table 7

3, serious eye injury/Eye irritation

Serious eye injury/Eye irritation harm classification of mixture is other than application bridge formation principle, mainly with critical value/dense The application for spending limit value, the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture, specific as shown in table 8: table 8 is mixed Close critical value/concentration limit principle of the serious eye injury/eye irritation of object.

Table 8

The chemical component of partial skin harmfulness, including acid, alkali, inorganic salts, aldehydes, phenol and interfacial activity Agent will judge the whole harm of its mixture then with concentration limit or pH value, and specific rules are as shown in table 9: table 9 is mixture Other determination methods of serious eye injury/eye irritation.

Table 9

4, skin allergy/respiratory tract anaphylaxis

The skin allergy of mixture/respiratory tract anaphylaxis harm classification in addition to application bridge formation principle other than, mainly with critical value/ The application of concentration limit, the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture are specific as shown in table 10: table 10 For mixture skin allergy/respiratory tract anaphylaxis critical value/concentration limit principle.

Table 10

5, reproduction cell mutagenicity

The reproduction cell mutagenicity harm classification of mixture is other than application bridge formation principle, mainly with control value/dense The application for spending limit value, the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture, specific as shown in table 11: table 11 is The critical value of mixture reproduction cell mutagenicity/concentration limit principle.

Table 11

6, carcinogenicity

The carcinogenicity harm classification of mixture is mainly answered other than application bridge formation principle with control value/concentration limit With the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture is specific as shown in table 12: table 12 is that mixture is carcinogenic Critical value/concentration limit principle of property.

Table 12

7, genotoxicity

The genotoxicity harm classification of mixture in addition to application bridge formation principle other than, mainly with control value/concentration limit it Using the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture is specific as shown in table 13: table 13 is that mixture is raw Grow critical value/concentration limit principle of toxicity.

Table 13

8, specific target organ toxicity (primary contact)

Specific target organ toxicity (primary contact) harm classification of mixture other than application bridge formation principle, mainly with The application of control value/concentration limit, the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture, as shown in table 14: Table 14 is critical value/concentration limit principle of mixture specific target organ toxicity (primary contact).

Table 14

9, specific target organ toxicity (contacting repeatedly)

Specific target organ toxicity (repeatedly contact) harm classification of mixture other than application bridge formation principle, mainly with The application of control value/concentration limit, the whole harm classification using the harm classification of its ingredient as mixture, specifically such as 15 institute of table Show: table 15 is critical value/concentration limit principle of mixture specific target organ toxicity (contacting repeatedly).

Table 15

Embodiment 5

This specific embodiment further defines objective appraisal substance on the basis of embodiment 1, including, building materials health danger The representation method of evil label are as follows:

The health hazard degree of component corresponding in building material product is marked with default label color, such as 16 institute of table Show:

Table 16

As shown in table 17 with the component distribution situation of different health hazard labels in content mark building material product: table 17 is not Constituent content with health hazard label is distributed:

Red-DG	Yellow	Green
			X%	X%	X%

Table 17

Embodiment 6

This specific embodiment is disclosed according to the evaluation method in embodiment 1-7, by taking inner wall putty product as an example, according to group Divide evaluation assessment, Health hazard assessments result is as shown in table 18:

Table 18

Wherein: A, the harm label of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose ether evaluates explanation, as shown in table 19:

Table 19

Basic evaluation thinking:

According to the health hazard label scaling criterion of chemicals, which should be green (Green).

B, colloid protective agent: the harm label of polyvinyl alcohol evaluates explanation, as shown in table 20:

Table 20

Basic evaluation thinking:

(1) it tends towards superiority principle according to harm, selects the compromise data in MSDS as judgment basis；

(2) according to the health hazard label scaling criterion of chemicals, the health hazard label of the substance is Yellow-DG.

The constituent content of different health hazard labels is distributed, as shown in table 21:

Red	Yellow-DG	Green
			0%	0.2%	100.3%

Table 21

Embodiment 9:

This specific embodiment is disclosed according to the evaluation method in embodiment 1-7, by taking white glue with vinyl product as an example, due to Virgin's milk Glue can chemically react in process of production, therefore be evaluated according to the composition information after chemical reaction.It is commented according to component Valence method, Health hazard assessments result are as shown in table 22:

Table 22

A, the harm label of polyvinyl acetate evaluates explanation, as shown in table 23:

Table 23

Basic evaluation thinking:

According to label scaling criterion is endangered, which should be green (Green).

B, the harm label of polyvinyl alcohol evaluates explanation, as shown in table 24:

Table 24

Basic evaluation thinking: (1) it according to harm tends towards superiority principle, selects the compromise data in MSDS as judgment basis；(2) According to the health hazard label scaling criterion of chemicals, the health hazard label of the substance is Yellow-DG.

C, the harm label of ACTICIDE RS fungicide evaluates explanation, as shown in Table 25:

Table 25

Basic evaluation thinking: (1) according to the principle that endangers type and grade while tending towards superiority, select the skin in MSDS rotten Erosion/irritation-classification 1 is used as judgment basis；

(2) according to label scaling criterion is endangered, the health hazard label of the substance is Yellow.

The constituent content distribution of different health hazard labels is as shown in table 26:

Red	Yellow/Yellow-DG	Green
			0%	4.3%	> 95%

Table 26

Reference

(1) " GB 30000.18-2013: chemicals classification and the 18th part of Label specifications: acute toxicity "

(2) " GB 30000.19-2013: chemicals classification and the 19th part of Label specifications: skin corrosion/stimulation "

(3) " GB 30000.20-2013: chemicals classification and the 20th part of Label specifications: serious eye injury/Eye irritation "

(4) " GB 30000.21-2013: chemicals classification and the 21st part of Label specifications: skin/respiratory tract sensitization "

(5) " GB 30000.22-2013: chemicals classification and the 22nd part of Label specifications: reproduction cell mutagenicity "

(6) " GB 30000.23-2013: chemicals classification and the 23rd part of Label specifications: carcinogenicity "

(7) " GB 30000.24-2013: chemicals classification and the 24th part of Label specifications: genotoxicity "

(8) " GB 30000.25-2013: chemicals classification and the 25th part of Label specifications: specific target organ toxicity one Secondary contact "

(9) " GB 30000.26-2013: chemicals classification and the 26th part of Label specifications: specific target organ toxicity is anti- Multiple connection touching "

(10) " classification of GB 13690-2009 chemicals and risk publicity general rule "

(11) " GB/T 16483-2008 Chemical Safety Data Sheet content and project order "

(12) " GB/T 17519-2013 Chemical Safety Data Sheet writes guide "

(13) " hazardous chemical catalogue (2015 editions) "

(14) " international cancer research institution, World Health Organization carcinogenic substance inventory "

(15) " the motion chemical substance inventory of California 65 "

(16) " the newest highest attention surrounding material of REACH "

(17) " REACH regulation limits list of substances-REACH attachment Ⅹ VII "

(18) " EU chemicals classification, label and Package Ordinances-attachment VI "

(19) " GB 30000.20-2013: chemicals classification and Label specifications "

It should be noted that above-described embodiment can be freely combined as needed.The above is only of the invention preferred Embodiment, it is noted that for those skilled in the art, in the premise for not departing from the principle of the invention Under, several improvements and modifications can also be made, these modifications and embellishments should also be considered as the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. a kind of component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard, which comprises the following steps:

S1, from the angle contacted with air, according to chemicals classification and risk publicity general rule, to from air route of exposure To human health, there are the harm types and rating information of risk to summarize, and generates the health hazard classification and classification of chemicals Aggregation table；

S2, according to the health hazard degree of the chemicals and classification and classification aggregation table, referring concurrently to Chemicals Database and/ Or Chemical Safety Data Sheet formulates the health hazard label scaling criterion of chemicals by the way of color identifier；

The content information of S3, the ingredient names for obtaining building material product and each component；

If S4, described group be divided into pure substance, need to be from the Chemicals Database and/or the Chemical Safety Data Sheet Health hazard classification and the rating information of the pure substance are obtained, and according to the health hazard label scaling criterion of the chemicals The health hazard size of the pure substance described in color identifier formulates the health hazard label of the pure substance；

Or,

If described group is divided into mixture, it need to be classified by the health hazard of the mixture and be classified computation rule and/or described The health hazard classification that Chemicals Database and/or the Chemical Safety Data Sheet obtain the mixture is believed with classification Breath, and the health hazard size of the mixture according to the health hazard label scaling criterion color identifier of the chemicals, Formulate the health hazard label of the mixture.

2. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step S1:

It is described from air route of exposure to human health there are the harm type of risk be carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell Mutagenicity, acute toxicity, serious eye injury/Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation, breathing/skin allergy, the spy once contacted Anisotropic target organ toxicity, the specific target organ toxicity contacted repeatedly.

3. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as claimed in claim 2, which is characterized in that in the step S1:

S111, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproduction cell mutagenicity are classified as group 1, and according to health hazard degree to group Health hazard in 1 is successively labeled with red, two kinds of colors of yellow；

S112, it by acute toxicity, serious eye injury/Eye irritation, skin corrosion/stimulation and breathing/skin allergy, once contacts Specific target organ toxicity, the specific target organ toxicity contacted repeatedly are classified as group 2, and according to health hazard degree to group Health hazard in 2 is successively labeled with red, two kinds of colors of yellow.

4. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as claimed in claim 3, which is characterized in that the chemicals is good for Health endangers label scaling criterion are as follows:

S21, when the component has the health hazard of group 1 and/or group 2, danger need to be selected according to " harm is tended towards superiority " principle Evil classification is clear and the highest compromise data of grade is as judgment basis；

S22, when the harm for navigating to the component in the Chemicals Database and the Chemical Safety Data Sheet Classification is group 1, but when can not navigate to the hazard rating of the component, is then labeled as to the health hazard grade of the component Shortage of data, and indicate that it endangers risk with red, i.e. red-shortage of data；

And/or

When the harm classification for navigating to the component in the Chemicals Database and the Chemical Safety Data Sheet For group 2, but when can not navigate to the hazard rating of the component, then data are labeled as to the health hazard grade of the component It lacks, and indicates that it endangers risk with yellow, is i.e. yellow-shortage of data；

S23, when in the Chemicals Database and the Chemical Safety Data Sheet position less than described group timesharing, And health hazard information is unknown, is marked at this time to the health hazard of the component using blank.

5. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as claimed in claim 4, which is characterized in that in the step S21:

The red expression health hazard is relatively high, should be avoided in formula and the substance occurs；

The yellow indicates health hazard rather moderate, allows to occur in formula, but should find safer substitute materials；

The green indicates that health hazard is relatively low, is the safe substance of comparison；

The blank mark indicates that health hazard is unknown, can not determine that it endangers size.

6. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step S3:

From the approach contacted with air, the constituent for needing the building material product for carrying out health hazard assessment is sieved Choosing, determines the component evaluated.

7. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step S4, The health hazard classification of the mixture and classification computation rule:

If S411, described mixture itself have been determined the test of its toxicity, according to obtained experimental data and chemicals Health hazard grade scale classified and be classified；

If S412, the mixture are without the whole test data that can use its determining toxicity, according to bridge formation principle to mixing The health hazard of object is classified and is classified；

S413, when the bridge formation principle is not applicable, then need to be classified according to the health hazard of component each in mixture and point Grade data to carry out harm classification and classification to the mixture.

8. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step S4:

S421, when the component has the health hazard of group 1, need to be demarcated according to the health hazard label of the chemicals quasi- Then identify the health hazard of the component；

Or,

It, need to be according to the health hazard label scaling criterion of the chemicals when the component only has the health hazard of group 2 To identify the health hazard of the chemicals.

9. the component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as claimed in claim 7, which is characterized in that the chemicals data Library, comprising:

Hazardous chemical catalogue and/or international cancer research institution, World Health Organization carcinogenic substance inventory and/or California 65 mention Case chemical substance inventory and/or label and Package Ordinances-attachment VI.

10. a kind of component evaluation assessment of building material product health hazard as claimed in claim 8, which is characterized in that the building materials The representation method of product health hazard label are as follows:

The health hazard of component each in building material product is marked with default label color；

Or,

With the component distribution situation of identical health hazard label in content mark building material product.