CN109960640A - Software Quality Evaluation System and method - Google Patents
Software Quality Evaluation System and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109960640A CN109960640A CN201711400224.1A CN201711400224A CN109960640A CN 109960640 A CN109960640 A CN 109960640A CN 201711400224 A CN201711400224 A CN 201711400224A CN 109960640 A CN109960640 A CN 109960640A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- index
- software
- evaluation
- expert
- weighted value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3616—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs using software metrics
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of Software Quality Evaluation System and methods, realize quick, accurate evaluation to software quality.The Software Quality Evaluation System, comprising: expert's number setup module, for the expert's number for participating in this software evaluation to be arranged；Marking evaluation module, for giving a mark for the expert for participating in software evaluation to software index；Index weights setup module, for the corresponding weighted value of indices to be arranged；Report print module is evaluated, expert and calculates according to preference value and present the evaluation result of software quality to the marking of each index of software as a result, in conjunction with the marking result of indices and the preference value of weight value computation software index for rendering.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to computer software performance evaluation assessment techniques, and in particular to a kind of Software Quality Evaluation System and side
Method.
Background technique
User's selection software product, which needs to compare repeatedly, to make a policy, and the core of foundation is the evaluation of system software quality
As a result.And the evaluation of software quality is a complicated decision problem, because the technical indicator or ability of metric software quality refer to
Mark often has the factors such as ambiguity, uncertainty and grey majorized model.The method for evaluating software quality of Scientific exploration simultaneously realizes calculating
Machine can carry out decision for software quality management personnel and provide data basis, also provide for user when selecting software objectively
Compare foundation.
Currently, software quality evaluation mostly uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, both evaluation methods are having
Not can be well solved problem in a little situations: if analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is when the comparison factor of same level is more, expert is easy
The judgement of existing contradiction or confusion, fuzzy comprehensive evoluation are related to element and are subordinate to situation certainly to fuzzy concept, but in reality
Often there is element to two aspects of affirmative and negative of fuzzy concept, i.e., both the above method in some cases cannot be effective
Solve the inconsistency of physical presence.
Summary of the invention
The technical problems to be solved by the present invention are: proposing a kind of Software Quality Evaluation System and method, realize to software
Quick, the accurate evaluation of quality.
The technical solution adopted by the present invention to solve the technical problems is: Software Quality Evaluation System, comprising:
Expert's number setup module, for the expert's number for participating in this software evaluation to be arranged；
Marking evaluation module, for giving a mark for the expert for participating in software evaluation to software index；
Index weights setup module, for the corresponding weighted value of indices to be arranged；
Report print module is evaluated, expert is to the marking of each index of software as a result, beating in conjunction with indices for rendering
Divide the preference value of result and weight value computation software index, and the evaluation result of software quality is calculated and presented according to preference value.
As advanced optimizing, expert's number setup module supports 3-10 expert of setting to give a mark, and default is set
It is set to 4 people marking.
As advanced optimizing, the index weights setup module supports the setting of system default weighted value and user customized
Weighted value setting, the default weight value refer to that system is directed to each phase index calculated weight automatically using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Value, the customized weighted value of user refer to that user oneself specifies the weighted value of index to be evaluated, and weighted value is bigger to illustrate this
Index is more important.
As advanced optimizing, the software index includes first class index and the corresponding two-level index of first class index, wherein
First class index includes: instrumentality, reliability, maintainability, portability；
The corresponding two-level index of instrumentality includes: accuracy, safety, compliance；The corresponding two-level index packet of reliability
It includes: maturity, fault tolerant, Yi Huifu；Maintainable corresponding two-level index includes: easy analysis, stability, Easy Test；It can
The corresponding two-level index of transplantability includes: compliance, mountable, transferable.
In addition, another object of the present invention, which also resides in, proposes a kind of method for evaluating software quality comprising following steps:
A, the evaluation index of software performance is set；
B, expert gives a mark to the evaluation index of software performance；
C, the weighted value of evaluation index is determined；
D, preference value is calculated according to the weighted value of evaluation index and expert estimation, and then judges software quality and is shown
Show.
As advanced optimizing, in step C, by the setting of system default weighted value and the customized weighted value setting of user come
Determine the weighted value of evaluation index.
As advanced optimizing, in step D, the result finally shown includes the raw data table of expert estimation, calculates
Preference value tables of data and evaluation result to software quality.
As advanced optimizing, opinion rating is given in the evaluation result and software needs improved index.
The beneficial effects of the present invention are: meeting the needs of different user using customized weight and default-weight, pass through calculation
Method assayer marking data calculate last preference value in conjunction with weight index, and then judge software quality, obtain knot
By.System operational speed is fast, it was therefore concluded that and it is accurate, it can satisfy software quality evaluation demand.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is Software Quality Evaluation System structural block diagram of the invention；
Fig. 2 is method for evaluating software quality flow chart of the invention.
Specific embodiment
The present invention is directed to propose a kind of Software Quality Evaluation System and method, realize to software quality it is quick, accurately comment
Valence.The evaluation of software quality is a complicated systematic procedure, including many influence indexs, and emphasis difference can generate different
Evaluation result.Index is more, and contradiction is more, how to take into account each index, obtains the satisfied evaluation result of science, is policymaker's warp
The problem of being commonly encountered.The present invention establishes software quality evaluation index system, can open up reason according to the assessment indicator system application of foundation
By matter-element model is established, correlation function and calculating correlation are established, the preference value calculated result for finally comparing weight (is evaluated
As a result it) draws a conclusion, effective evaluation is carried out to software quality.
The solution of the present invention is described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawing:
As shown in Figure 1, the Software Quality Evaluation System in the present invention, comprising:
Expert's number setup module, for the expert's number for participating in this software evaluation to be arranged；
Marking evaluation module, for giving a mark for the expert for participating in software evaluation to software index；
Index weights setup module, for the corresponding weighted value of indices to be arranged；
Report print module is evaluated, expert is to the marking of each index of software as a result, beating in conjunction with indices for rendering
Divide the preference value of result and weight value computation software index, and the evaluation result of software quality is calculated and presented according to preference value.
In specific implementation, expert's number setup module supports 3-10 expert of setting to give a mark, and default setting is 4 people
Marking.
Marking evaluation module receives the data that each expert gives a mark to corresponding index, each corresponding score of index
Range be 60~100, due to different regions different user to software quality have it is different stress, software quality quantitatively evaluating
Standard is also not quite similar.All kinds of software features are comprehensively considered, based on GB/T16260 series standard, in conjunction with ISO/IEC9126
The evaluation index of the software quality evaluation index system of standard formulation mainly includes instrumentality, reliability, maintainability, portability
4 first class index, the corresponding two-level index of instrumentality include: accuracy, safety, compliance；The corresponding second level of reliability refers to
Mark includes: maturity, fault tolerant, Yi Huifu；Maintainable corresponding two-level index includes: easy analysis, stability, easily surveys
Examination；Portable corresponding two-level index includes: compliance, mountable, transferable.
Value in this system about evaluation criterion weight is divided into two kinds: system default weighted value and the customized weight of user
Value:
System default weight refers to system by date comprision, and what application level analytic approach obtained after calculating each comments
Valence index weights, this kind of weighted values are able to satisfy most software systems evaluation.
The customized weighted value of user is then that user oneself is needed to specify which index of wanted evaluation software even more important,
After setting weight, to evaluate the superiority-inferiority of software by subsequent algorithm.It, in this way can be to avoid having using customized weight
There is the software of particular/special requirement just cannot obtain evaluation data certain evaluation indexes a bit.
The initial data of expert estimation, the preference value calculated and evaluation result are passed through meter by evaluation report print module
It embodies, creates report using crystal report tool.When requested, crystal report directly connects according to specified driving
It connects and assembles these data after database, when display can clearly indicate out the data of database purchase.
When carrying out system design, using c/s (client/server) three-decker:
Presentation layer, i.e. user use the display interface of software, realize the page of function and specialty evaluation；
Operation layer carries out comprehensive processing and calculating, concrete implementation level point to the data that the page is sent
The algorithm of analysis method, is linked together weight and attribute data, obtains preference value and evaluation result；
Data Layer, i.e., using SQLServer2008 to the storage and management of evaluation initial data, weight and evaluation result.
Based on above system, method for evaluating software quality that the present invention realizes as shown in Fig. 2, itself the following steps are included:
A, the evaluation index of software performance is set；
B, expert gives a mark to the evaluation index of software performance；
C, the weighted value of evaluation index is determined；
D, preference value is calculated according to the weighted value of evaluation index and expert estimation, and then judges software quality and is shown
Show.
The result finally shown includes the raw data table of expert estimation, the preference value tables of data of calculating and to software quality
Evaluation result, opinion rating is given in evaluation result and software needs improved index, for software advanced optimize to
Guidance instruction is gone out.
Claims (8)
1. Software Quality Evaluation System characterized by comprising
Expert's number setup module, for the expert's number for participating in this software evaluation to be arranged；
Marking evaluation module, for giving a mark for the expert for participating in software evaluation to software index；
Index weights setup module, for the corresponding weighted value of indices to be arranged；
Evaluate report print module, for rendering expert to each index of software marking as a result, in conjunction with indices marking knot
The preference value of fruit and weight value computation software index, and the evaluation result of software quality is calculated and presented according to preference value.
2. Software Quality Evaluation System as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that expert's number setup module support is set
It sets 3-10 expert to give a mark, default setting is 4 people marking.
3. Software Quality Evaluation System as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the index weights setup module supports system
Default weight value of uniting is arranged and the customized weighted value setting of user, the default weight value refer to system using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) needle
To each phase index, calculated weighted value, the customized weighted value of user refer to that user oneself specifies index to be evaluated automatically
Weighted value, weighted value is bigger, and explanation this index is more important.
4. Software Quality Evaluation System as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the software index include first class index and
The corresponding two-level index of first class index, wherein first class index includes: instrumentality, reliability, maintainability, portability；Function
The corresponding two-level index of property includes: accuracy, safety, compliance；The corresponding two-level index of reliability includes: maturity, mistake
Accidentally tolerance, Yi Huifu；Maintainable corresponding two-level index includes: easy analysis, stability, Easy Test；It is portable corresponding
Two-level index includes: compliance, mountable, transferable.
5. method for evaluating software quality, which comprises the following steps:
A, the evaluation index of software performance is set；
B, expert gives a mark to the evaluation index of software performance；
C, the weighted value of evaluation index is determined；
D, preference value is calculated according to the weighted value of evaluation index and expert estimation, and then judges software quality and is shown.
6. method for evaluating software quality as claimed in claim 5, which is characterized in that in step C, pass through system default weighted value
It is arranged with the customized weighted value setting of user and determines the weighted value of evaluation index.
7. method for evaluating software quality as claimed in claim 5, which is characterized in that in step D, the result finally shown includes
The raw data table of expert estimation, the preference value tables of data of calculating and the evaluation result to software quality.
8. method for evaluating software quality as claimed in claim 7, which is characterized in that give evaluation etc. in the evaluation result
Grade and software need improved index.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711400224.1A CN109960640A (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2017-12-22 | Software Quality Evaluation System and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711400224.1A CN109960640A (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2017-12-22 | Software Quality Evaluation System and method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109960640A true CN109960640A (en) | 2019-07-02 |
Family
ID=67018863
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711400224.1A Withdrawn CN109960640A (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2017-12-22 | Software Quality Evaluation System and method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109960640A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113052411A (en) * | 2019-12-26 | 2021-06-29 | 北京邮电大学 | Data product quality evaluation method and device |
| CN113535573A (en) * | 2021-07-26 | 2021-10-22 | 北京计算机技术及应用研究所 | GOMS model improvement-based software availability quantitative evaluation method |
-
2017
- 2017-12-22 CN CN201711400224.1A patent/CN109960640A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113052411A (en) * | 2019-12-26 | 2021-06-29 | 北京邮电大学 | Data product quality evaluation method and device |
| CN113535573A (en) * | 2021-07-26 | 2021-10-22 | 北京计算机技术及应用研究所 | GOMS model improvement-based software availability quantitative evaluation method |
| CN113535573B (en) * | 2021-07-26 | 2023-07-14 | 北京计算机技术及应用研究所 | GOMS model improvement-based software availability quantitative evaluation method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106502910A (en) | Software quality evaluation system and method | |
| Asif et al. | A composite index for measuring performance in higher education institutions | |
| Alinezhad et al. | Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS technique: the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives | |
| Sander et al. | SmartPLS for the human resources field to evaluate a model | |
| CN114519498B (en) | Quality inspection and evaluation method and system based on BIM model | |
| JP6978231B2 (en) | Energy saving effect calculation device and method | |
| US20150170304A1 (en) | Methods and systems for projecting earnings and creating earnings tools within an online career network | |
| Hanna et al. | Mathematical formulation of the project quarterback rating: New framework to assess construction project performance | |
| JP2019101683A (en) | Optimization method of conditions for simulation, manufacturing process simulation apparatus, manufacturing process simulation system, and program | |
| Misra et al. | Survey on agile metrics and their inter-relationship with other traditional development metrics | |
| AU2018204669A1 (en) | Monitors for movements of workers | |
| CN109960640A (en) | Software Quality Evaluation System and method | |
| JP6012860B2 (en) | Work time estimation device | |
| CN106960398A (en) | The rational appraisal procedure of college entrance will and device | |
| Djema et al. | A two-stage DEA with partial least squares regression model for performance analysis in healthcare in Algeria | |
| Li et al. | Applying time-series analysis to detect scale drift | |
| Qiu et al. | A data-driven method for comprehensive pavement-condition ranking | |
| Wu | Process performance evaluation based on Taguchi capability index with the consideration of measurement errors | |
| CN106779288A (en) | A kind of ocean platform weight control system and control method based on computational intelligence | |
| CN106779354A (en) | Bayes data fusion evaluation methods based on power prior distribation | |
| CN113901092B (en) | File management method and system for racing field operation monitoring | |
| US8595686B2 (en) | Software modification estimate method and software modification estimate system | |
| US8255881B2 (en) | System and method for calculating software certification risks | |
| US20190385258A1 (en) | Compliance assessment and improvement system and methods | |
| JP2018142248A (en) | Answer sheet grading system and answer sheet grading method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20190702 |