CN109801186A - A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy - Google Patents
A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109801186A CN109801186A CN201910034890.0A CN201910034890A CN109801186A CN 109801186 A CN109801186 A CN 109801186A CN 201910034890 A CN201910034890 A CN 201910034890A CN 109801186 A CN109801186 A CN 109801186A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- scoring
- electric power
- power overhaul
- overhaul equipment
- points
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- SBNFWQZLDJGRLK-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenothrin Chemical compound CC1(C)C(C=C(C)C)C1C(=O)OCC1=CC=CC(OC=2C=CC=CC=2)=C1 SBNFWQZLDJGRLK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E40/00—Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y02E40/70—Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy, this method carries out significance level scoring at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects to electric power overhaul equipment first, significance level scoring is followed successively by A, B, C, D, E, simultaneously, it is scored at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects using hundred-mark system point system electric power overhaul equipment, scoring is followed successively by a, b, c, d, e, then obtains the scoring of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to formula X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E).The method that the design not only passes through quantization evaluates the economy of different electric power overhaul equipment, to facilitate the selection of the distinct device to same purposes, and variety classes equipment is considered when being evaluated in safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, the significance level of five different aspects of service life, impart the right of appraiser's unrestricted choice.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to electric power overhaul apparatus field more particularly to a kind of quantitatively evaluating sides of electric power overhaul equipment economy
Method, the economy being primarily adapted for use between more similar electric power overhaul equipment, to electric power practitioner in selection electric power overhaul equipment
When reference is provided.
Background technique
The assets of power grid enterprises are widely distributed, and there is long management chain, plant life cycle length, material object to change and value change
The features such as inconsistent is moved, brings enormous pressure to power grid asset operation, maintenance and management.And electric power relevant device is constantly sent out
Exhibition, outmoded electric power overhaul technology and equipment can no longer meet current needs, affect to a certain extent electric power overhaul with
Power construction is horizontal, and making electric power overhaul with power construction quality, there are problems.
Current various electric power overhaul technologies are all in continuous research, and various electric power overhaul equipment are also in continually developing, electricity
The maintenance of the equipment such as power switch, power transformer, power cable is all constantly updating, on the market and each scientific research institutions all
In the exploitation for constantly carrying out instrument and equipment.Electric power overhaul and power construction work are frequently necessary to operation of ascending a height simultaneously, can apply
Small-sized hoisting machinery, with the development of science and technology, various machinery are also kept updating.
But none targetedly Economic Analysis Method well of these repair apparatus at present, often equipment development
Person is to consider the aspect of a concern and have ignored other important conditions in electric power overhaul, causes power worker
It can not weigh when selecting repair apparatus.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is overcome the defect of similar electric power overhaul equipment selection difficulty existing in the prior art and ask
Topic provides a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy that similar electric power overhaul equipment selection is easy.
In order to achieve the above object, the technical solution of the invention is as follows: a kind of quantization of electric power overhaul equipment economy is commented
Valence method, method includes the following steps:
Step 1: carrying out important journey at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects to electric power overhaul equipment
Degree scoring, significance level scoring minimum 1, significance level scoring up to 5；
Using hundred-mark system point system to electric power overhaul equipment at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects
It scores；
Step 2: obtaining the scoring of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to the following formula:
X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E)；
Wherein, A is the scoring of safety significance level, and B is the scoring of accuracy significance level, and C is the scoring of price significance level,
D is time-consuming significance level scoring, and E is the scoring of service life significance level, and a is safety scoring, and b is accuracy scoring, and c comments for price
Point, d is time-consuming scoring, and e is service life scoring.
In step 1, the safety scoring=equipment self-security scoring+user of service's safety scoring+power grid peace
Full property scoring；
Wherein, the scoring of equipment self-security is scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment in terms of self-security, equipment itself
Safety scoring is less than or equal to 30 points；User of service's safety scoring is electric power overhaul equipment in the safeguard protection to staff
Property in terms of scoring, user of service's safety scoring be less than or equal to 40 points；Electric network security scoring is electric power overhaul equipment right
Scoring in terms of the safety of power grid, electric network security scoring are less than or equal to 30 points.
In step 1, the accuracy scoring=80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment error-existing large-scale use electricity
Power repair apparatus error) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment error；
Wherein, the accuracy scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If accuracy is scored above 100 points, accuracy scoring is denoted as 100 points.
In step 1, the price scoring=80-80 × (the electric power overhaul equipment total price-covering in one region of covering
The total price of the electric power overhaul equipment of the existing large-scale use in one region) ÷ cover a region existing large-scale use
Electric power overhaul equipment total price；
Wherein, the price scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If price is scored above 100 points, price scoring is denoted as 100 points.
In step 1, the time-consuming scoring=80-80 × (electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance is time-consuming-existing to be made on a large scale
Electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance is time-consuming) the electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance of the existing large-scale use of ÷ is time-consuming；
Wherein, the time-consuming scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If time-consuming is scored above 100 points, time-consuming scoring is denoted as 100 points.
In step 1, the service life scoring=80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment life-existing large-scale use electric power
The repair apparatus service life) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment life；
Wherein, the service life scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If the service life is scored above 100 points, service life scoring is denoted as 100 points.
Compared with prior art, the invention has the benefit that
First to electric power overhaul equipment in safety in a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy of the present invention
Property, accuracy, price, time-consuming, the aspect of service life five carry out significance level scorings, significance level scoring is followed successively by A, B, C, D, E,
Meanwhile electric power overhaul equipment is carried out at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects using hundred-mark system point system
Scoring, scoring are followed successively by a, b, c, d, e, then obtain electric power according to formula X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E)
The scoring of repair apparatus economy；The method that the design not only passes through quantization comments the economy of different electric power overhaul equipment
Valence to facilitate the selection of the distinct device to same purposes, and considers variety classes equipment when being evaluated and is pacifying
Quan Xing, accuracy, price, time-consuming, the significance level of five different aspects of service life, impart the right of appraiser's unrestricted choice.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow chart of the method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
Below in conjunction with Detailed description of the invention and specific embodiment, the present invention is described in further detail.
Referring to Fig. 1, a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy, method includes the following steps:
Step 1: carrying out important journey at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects to electric power overhaul equipment
Degree scoring, significance level scoring minimum 1, significance level scoring up to 5；
Using hundred-mark system point system to electric power overhaul equipment at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects
It scores；
Step 2: obtaining the scoring of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to the following formula:
X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E)；
Wherein, A is the scoring of safety significance level, and B is the scoring of accuracy significance level, and C is the scoring of price significance level,
D is time-consuming significance level scoring, and E is the scoring of service life significance level, and a is safety scoring, and b is accuracy scoring, and c comments for price
Point, d is time-consuming scoring, and e is service life scoring.
In step 1, the safety scoring=equipment self-security scoring+user of service's safety scoring+power grid peace
Full property scoring；
Wherein, the scoring of equipment self-security is scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment in terms of self-security, equipment itself
Safety scoring is less than or equal to 30 points；User of service's safety scoring is electric power overhaul equipment in the safeguard protection to staff
Property in terms of scoring, user of service's safety scoring be less than or equal to 40 points；Electric network security scoring is electric power overhaul equipment right
Scoring in terms of the safety of power grid, electric network security scoring are less than or equal to 30 points.
In step 1, the accuracy scoring=80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment error-existing large-scale use electricity
Power repair apparatus error) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment error；
Wherein, the accuracy scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If accuracy is scored above 100 points, accuracy scoring is denoted as 100 points.
In step 1, the price scoring=80-80 × (the electric power overhaul equipment total price-covering in one region of covering
The total price of the electric power overhaul equipment of the existing large-scale use in one region) ÷ cover a region existing large-scale use
Electric power overhaul equipment total price；
Wherein, the price scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If price is scored above 100 points, price scoring is denoted as 100 points.
In step 1, the time-consuming scoring=80-80 × (electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance is time-consuming-existing to be made on a large scale
Electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance is time-consuming) the electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance of the existing large-scale use of ÷ is time-consuming；
Wherein, the time-consuming scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If time-consuming is scored above 100 points, time-consuming scoring is denoted as 100 points.
In step 1, the service life scoring=80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment life-existing large-scale use electric power
The repair apparatus service life) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment life；
Wherein, the service life scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If the service life is scored above 100 points, service life scoring is denoted as 100 points.
The principle of the present invention is described as follows:
The design proposes a kind of electricity based on from the aspect of safety, accuracy, price (cost), time-consuming, the service life five
Power repair apparatus economy method for quantitatively evaluating provides reference when selecting repair apparatus to electric power practitioner.This method is first
Need user to different repair apparatus at safety, accuracy, price (cost), time-consuming, the aspect of service life five according to weight
It wants degree to distinguish (1-5), then gives a mark respectively to this five aspects, obtain following table.
Then the scoring of its economy can be obtained according to following formula:
X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E)；
Above-mentioned formula considers distinct device at five aspects such as safety, accuracy, price (cost), time-consuming, service life
Significance level, can voluntarily be judged by appraiser, can be scored by equipment economy that the formula obtains and be set come more similar
Economy between standby, to select more suitable equipment.
(1) safety: repair apparatus safety is from equipment self-security (full marks 30), equipment to the safety of staff
Protectiveness (full marks 40), equipment are evaluated (full marks 30) to safety of power grid etc..
(2) it accuracy: is compared with the same category of device (80 points of basis point) of existing large-scale use, accuracy is promoted
How much, then the corresponding promotion of accuracy estimating score.
(3) it price: is compared with the same category of device (80 points of basis point) of existing large-scale use, price reduces more
It is few, then the corresponding promotion of price evaluation score；Price increases, then the corresponding reduction of evaluation score.
(4) time-consuming: some electrical power repair apparatus is used for interruption maintenance, and user requires the stabilization of power grids higher and higher, power failure
Difficulty is increasing；It is more and more important efficiently to carry out overhaul of the equipments using power-off event, it is time-consuming score mainly by with it is existing
The instrument and equipment (80 points of basis point) of large-scale application compares, and the time is shorter, scores higher.
(5) service life: equipment life evaluates repair apparatus in terms of service life of equipment, and the service life is longer, and scoring is got over
It is high；The equipment life of existing large-scale use is 80 points of basis points.
Embodiment:
Referring to Fig. 1, a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy, method includes the following steps:
Step 1: carrying out important journey at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects to electric power overhaul equipment
Degree scoring, significance level scoring minimum 1, significance level scoring up to 5；
Using hundred-mark system point system to electric power overhaul equipment at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects
It scores；
The safety scoring=equipment self-security scoring+user of service's safety scoring+electric network security scoring；
Wherein, equipment self-security scoring is scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment in terms of self-security, and equipment self-security is commented
Divide and is less than or equal to 30 points；User of service's safety scoring is electric power overhaul equipment in terms of the security protection to staff
Scoring, user of service's safety scoring are less than or equal to 40 points；Electric network security scoring is electric power overhaul equipment in the peace to power grid
Scoring in terms of full property, electric network security scoring are less than or equal to 30 points；
Accuracy scoring=the 80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment error-existing large-scale use electric power overhaul equipment
Error) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment error；Wherein, the standard of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use
Exactness scoring is 80 points；If accuracy is scored above 100 points, accuracy scoring is denoted as 100 points；
Price scoring=the 80-80 × (the electric power overhaul equipment total price-region of covering one in one region of covering
The total price of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use) ÷ cover a region existing large-scale use electric power overhaul
The total price of equipment；Wherein, the price scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；If price is scored above
100 points, then price scoring is denoted as 100 points；
Time-consuming scoring=the 80-80 × (the electric power inspection of time-consuming-existing large-scale use of electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance
It is time-consuming to repair equipment interruption maintenance) the electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance of the existing large-scale use of ÷ is time-consuming；Wherein, existing extensive
The time-consuming scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment used is 80 points；If time-consuming is scored above 100 points, time-consuming scoring is denoted as 100 points；
Service life scoring=the 80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment life-existing large-scale use electric power overhaul equipment longevity
Life) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment life；Wherein, the service life of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use
Scoring is 80 points；If the service life is scored above 100 points, service life scoring is denoted as 100 points；
Step 2: obtaining the scoring of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to the following formula:
X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E)；
Wherein, A is the scoring of safety significance level, and B is the scoring of accuracy significance level, and C is the scoring of price significance level,
D is time-consuming significance level scoring, and E is the scoring of service life significance level, and a is safety scoring, and b is accuracy scoring, and c comments for price
Point, d is time-consuming scoring, and e is service life scoring.
When selecting transformer fast frequency-domain dielectric response test macro, there are University Of Chongqing and commercial two kinds of IDAX-300
It can be selected that it is as follows to carry out economy scoring according to the above method:
University Of Chongqing's self-made Instrument:
Scoring: X1=86.67；
IDAX-300:
Scoring: X2=83.33；
It is final to consider selection University Of Chongqing's self-made Instrument.
Claims (6)
1. a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy, which is characterized in that method includes the following steps:
Step 1: electric power overhaul equipment is carried out significance level and is commented at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects
Point, significance level scoring minimum 1, significance level scoring up to 5；
Electric power overhaul equipment is carried out at five safety, accuracy, price, time-consuming, service life aspects using hundred-mark system point system
Scoring；
Step 2: obtaining the scoring of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to the following formula:
X=(Aa+Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee)/(A+B+C+D+E)；
Wherein, A is the scoring of safety significance level, and B is the scoring of accuracy significance level, and C is the scoring of price significance level, and D is
Time-consuming significance level scoring, E are the scoring of service life significance level, and a is safety scoring, and b is accuracy scoring, and c is price scoring,
D is time-consuming scoring, and e is service life scoring.
2. a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:
In step 1, the safety scoring=equipment self-security scoring+user of service's safety scoring+electric network security
Scoring；
Wherein, the scoring of equipment self-security is scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment in terms of self-security, equipment inherently safe
Property scoring be less than or equal to 30 points；User of service's safety scoring is electric power overhaul equipment in the security protection side to staff
The scoring in face, user of service's safety scoring are less than or equal to 40 points；Electric network security scoring is electric power overhaul equipment to power grid
Safety in terms of scoring, electric network security scoring be less than or equal to 30 points.
3. a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:
In step 1, the accuracy scoring=80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment error-existing large-scale use electric power inspection
Repair equipment error) the electric power overhaul equipment error of the existing large-scale use of ÷；
Wherein, the accuracy scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If accuracy is scored above 100 points, accuracy scoring is denoted as 100 points.
4. a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:
In step 1, the price scoring=80-80 × (the electric power overhaul equipment total price-covering one in one region of covering
The total price of the electric power overhaul equipment of the existing large-scale use in region) ÷ cover a region existing large-scale use electricity
The total price of power repair apparatus；
Wherein, the price scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If price is scored above 100 points, price scoring is denoted as 100 points.
5. a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:
In step 1, the time-consuming scoring=80-80 × (time-consuming-existing large-scale use of electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance
Electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance is time-consuming) the electric power overhaul equipment interruption maintenance of the existing large-scale use of ÷ is time-consuming；
Wherein, the time-consuming scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If time-consuming is scored above 100 points, time-consuming scoring is denoted as 100 points.
6. a kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:
In step 1, the service life scoring=80+80 × (electric power overhaul equipment life-existing large-scale use electric power overhaul
Equipment life) the existing large-scale use of ÷ electric power overhaul equipment life；
Wherein, the service life scoring of the electric power overhaul equipment of existing large-scale use is 80 points；
If the service life is scored above 100 points, service life scoring is denoted as 100 points.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910034890.0A CN109801186A (en) | 2019-01-15 | 2019-01-15 | A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910034890.0A CN109801186A (en) | 2019-01-15 | 2019-01-15 | A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109801186A true CN109801186A (en) | 2019-05-24 |
Family
ID=66558934
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910034890.0A Pending CN109801186A (en) | 2019-01-15 | 2019-01-15 | A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109801186A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113762609A (en) * | 2021-08-27 | 2021-12-07 | 浙江天垂科技有限公司 | Product quality prediction method and device |
-
2019
- 2019-01-15 CN CN201910034890.0A patent/CN109801186A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113762609A (en) * | 2021-08-27 | 2021-12-07 | 浙江天垂科技有限公司 | Product quality prediction method and device |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN104200288B (en) | A kind of equipment fault Forecasting Methodology based on dependency relation identification between factor and event | |
| CN102193555B (en) | Panoramic-state monitoring system for centralized control centers | |
| KR101683256B1 (en) | Asset management system and method for electric power apparatus | |
| CN106485418A (en) | A kind of risk analysis method and system | |
| CN103871000A (en) | Probability whole life cycle cost-based power transformer performance comprehensive evaluation method | |
| CN106447533A (en) | Evaluation method based on urban electric energy safety development indexes | |
| CN103996147A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation method for power distribution network | |
| CN104376383A (en) | Grid voltage monitoring and prediction system and method based on geographic information system | |
| CN108919003A (en) | A kind of test of sensitive equipment voltage dip resistance characteristics and data processing method | |
| CN108448721A (en) | The method of electric system main station monitoring signal and standard signal Auto-matching | |
| CN103150635A (en) | Operation and maintenance method of power equipment | |
| CN115423387B (en) | Intelligent early warning method and system for field behaviors of live working personnel of extra-high voltage line | |
| CN107862442A (en) | A kind of 10kv and following power customer are by electrical engineering construction quality integrated evaluating method | |
| CN107748767A (en) | A kind of power system monitor information storage and interaction code processing method and device | |
| CN107609775A (en) | A kind of active safety production risk apparatus for evaluating and method | |
| CN104123588A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation system and method of smart distribution grid | |
| CN109801186A (en) | A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of electric power overhaul equipment economy | |
| CN104598969A (en) | High-voltage electrical appliance operation quality evaluation method and system based on neural network | |
| CN102073924A (en) | Method and equipment for acquiring risk prevention and control grade of power transmission line | |
| Oh et al. | Voltage estimation method for power distribution networks using high-precision measurements | |
| CN103488891B (en) | Large grid safe stable prevention and control performance penalty index calculation method based on risks | |
| CN106329515A (en) | Power grid reliability level determination method based on static-state reliability probability index | |
| CN105353233B (en) | A kind of transformer on-line operation ability detection method and device | |
| Yun et al. | Development and field test of voltage VAR optimization in the Korean smart distribution management system | |
| Langouranis et al. | Fuzzy total power quality index for electric networks |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190524 |