CN109074522B

CN109074522B - Maintenance work management device

Info

Publication number: CN109074522B
Application number: CN201680084762.1A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 福永宽; 阪田恒次; 掛野真弘
Original assignee: Mitsubishi Electric Corp; Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd
Current assignee: Mitsubishi Electric Corp; Mitsubishi Electric Building Solutions Corp
Priority date: 2016-04-27
Filing date: 2016-04-27
Publication date: 2022-03-29
Anticipated expiration: 2036-04-27
Also published as: WO2017187564A1; KR20180115341A; CN109074522A; TW201738810A; KR101996202B1; DE112016006626T5; TWI698812B; JP6399253B2; JPWO2017187564A1

Abstract

The maintenance work management device (3) is provided with: a work configuration data acquisition unit (7) that acquires work configuration data that hierarchically represents point inspection objects that are higher than the point inspection objects in the maintenance work for the building equipment, and lower point inspection objects included in the higher point inspection objects; a determination method data acquisition unit (10) that acquires determination method data indicating a determination method for determining whether or not a work item has been executed; and a validity determination unit (13) for determining the validity of the information indicating the execution of the work item. When the determination method for the work item is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit (13) determines the validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed, in accordance with the determination method for another work item corresponding to a point inspection object belonging to the lowest layer and included in the upper point inspection objects of the point inspection objects corresponding to the work item in the work configuration data.

Description

Maintenance work management device

Technical Field

The present invention relates to a maintenance work management apparatus.

Background

Conventionally, there is known a system capable of determining whether or not an operation item in a maintenance operation of a building device is performed based on electronic data acquired from the building device. As such a system, for example, a system described in patent document 1 below is known.

Prior art documents

Patent document

Patent document 1: japanese patent laid-open publication No. 2011-102180

Disclosure of Invention

Problems to be solved by the invention

According to the system described above, it is possible to determine a work item in which corresponding electronic data can be generated by the building device. However, this system cannot determine a work item for which the corresponding electronic data cannot be generated by the building equipment. The work items for which the system cannot determine the execution are indicated, for example, by information input by a maintenance worker. In this case, it is possible that an unexecuted job item is erroneously recorded as implemented.

The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a maintenance work management apparatus capable of preventing an unexecuted work item from being erroneously recorded as an executed work item.

Means for solving the problems

The maintenance work management device of the present invention includes: a work configuration data acquisition unit that acquires work configuration data in which work configuration data is hierarchically shown in a manner that a point inspection object in a maintenance work for the building equipment is an upper point inspection object and a lower point inspection object included in the upper point inspection object; a checklist data acquisition unit that acquires checklist data showing a job item corresponding to a point inspection target belonging to the lowest layer in the job configuration data; a determination method data acquisition unit that acquires determination method data indicating a determination method for determining whether or not a work item indicated by the checklist data has been performed, based on electronic data that can be acquired from the building equipment; an inspection result storage unit that stores information indicating that the work item indicated by the inspection list data has been executed in association with the work item, in accordance with an input operation performed by a maintenance worker; and a validity determination unit that determines validity of information indicating that the work item has been executed, among the information stored in the inspection result storage unit, in accordance with a determination method indicated by the electronic data and the determination method data acquired from the building equipment, and that determines validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed, in accordance with a determination method that is described below, when the determination method for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit is not included in the determination method data: the determination method is a determination method for another work item corresponding to a higher-level object to be checked out of objects to be checked out corresponding to the work item and a lower-level object to be checked out belonging to the lowest-level object to be checked out of the object to be checked out corresponding to the work item in the work configuration data.

Effects of the invention

In the maintenance work management apparatus of the present invention, when the determination method for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit determines the validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed, in accordance with the determination method for another work item corresponding to the higher-level object included in the object to be checked corresponding to the work item in the work configuration data and the object to be checked belonging to the lowest-level layer. Therefore, according to the present invention, it is possible to prevent an unexecuted work item from being erroneously recorded as implemented.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a configuration diagram showing a maintenance work management system according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 2 is a diagram showing an example of job configuration data according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the checklist data according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 4 is a diagram showing an example of data corresponding to the determination method according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the determination method data according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 6 is a diagram showing an example of reference conditions in embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 7 is a diagram showing an example of display of a checklist according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 8 is a diagram showing an example of validity determination result data according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 9 is a diagram showing a display example of the inspection result reflecting the validity determination result in embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 10 is a first flowchart showing an example of the operation of the maintenance work management apparatus according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 11 is a second flowchart showing an example of the operation of the maintenance work management apparatus according to embodiment 1 of the present invention.

Fig. 12 is a hardware configuration diagram of the maintenance work management apparatus.

Detailed Description

The present invention is explained in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, the same or corresponding portions are denoted by the same reference numerals, and overlapping description is simplified or omitted as appropriate.

Embodiment mode 1

Fig. 1 is a configuration diagram of a maintenance work management system according to embodiment 1. The maintenance work management system is suitable for a building device to be subjected to maintenance work. The building equipment is, for example, a lift, an air conditioner, a lighting device, and the like installed in a building not shown. The elevator is, for example, an elevator or an escalator. The building equipment has a control panel 1.

As shown in fig. 1, the maintenance work management system includes an information center 2 and a maintenance work management apparatus 3. The information center 2 has a center storage unit 4. The maintenance work management apparatus 3 includes an operation unit 5, a display unit 6, a work configuration data acquisition unit 7, an inspection list data acquisition unit 8, a determination method correspondence data acquisition unit 9, a determination method data acquisition unit 10, an inspection result storage unit 11, an electronic data acquisition unit 12, a validity determination unit 13, an inspection result revision unit 14, and a display control unit 15.

The information center 2 is provided in a building different from the building in which the building equipment is provided, for example. The information center 2 is, for example, a server or the like provided at a management company of the building equipment.

The maintenance work management apparatus 3 is, for example, a device carried by a maintenance worker for building equipment. The maintenance work management apparatus 3 is, for example, a notebook computer, a tablet terminal, a smartphone, or the like. The operation unit 5 receives an input operation of information. The operation unit 5 is, for example, a button, a keyboard, various pointing devices, and the like. The display unit 6 displays information. The display unit 6 is, for example, a liquid crystal display or a touch panel. The touch panel can also serve as the operation unit 5 and the display unit 6.

The maintenance work management apparatus 3 can communicate with the control panel 1 and the information center 2 of the building equipment. The maintenance work management apparatus 3 communicates with the control panel 1 through a communication interface, not shown, provided in the building equipment, for example. The communication between the maintenance work management apparatus 3 and the control panel 1 may be wired communication or wireless communication. The communication between the maintenance work management apparatus 3 and the information center 2 may be wired communication or wireless communication.

Various data related to, for example, maintenance work of the building equipment is stored in advance in the central storage unit 4. The various data include job configuration data, checklist data, judgment method correspondence data, and judgment method data. The work structure data is information showing a check target of the maintenance work of the building equipment. The checklist data is information showing job items that can be implemented for the checklist object shown by the job configuration data. The determination method data is information showing a determination method as follows: the determination method is used for determining whether the operation item indicated by the checklist data is implemented or not according to the electronic data acquired from the building equipment. That is, the determination method indicated by the determination method data can be used to determine the validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed. The determination method correspondence data is information showing a correspondence relationship between the work item and the determination method.

The work configuration data acquisition unit 7 acquires the work configuration data from the central storage unit 4 through a network, for example. The checklist data acquiring unit 8 acquires checklist data from the central storage unit 4 through a network, for example. The determination method-related data acquisition unit 9 acquires the determination method-related data from the central storage unit 4 through a network, for example. The determination method data acquisition unit 10 acquires the determination method data from the central storage unit 4 through a network, for example.

The inspection result storage unit 11 stores information indicating that the work item indicated by the inspection list data has been executed in association with the work item, in accordance with the input operation received by the operation unit 5. The input operation received by the operation unit 5 is, for example, a check mark input by the maintenance worker to the checklist displayed on the display unit 6 based on the checklist data. That is, the operation unit 5 receives, for example, an input operation showing information that the work item shown in the checklist data has been executed.

The electronic data acquisition unit 12 acquires electronic data from the control panel 1 of the building equipment. The electronic data acquired from the control panel 1 is generated, for example, in accordance with the operation of a driving unit included in the building equipment.

The validity determination unit 13 determines the validity of information indicating that the work item has been performed, among the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11, in accordance with the electronic data acquired by the electronic data acquisition unit 12 and the determination method indicated by the determination method data. That is, the validity determination unit 13 determines whether or not a work item marked with a check mark by a maintenance worker is executed, for example.

When the validity determination unit 13 determines that the information indicating that the work item has been executed does not have validity in the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11, the inspection result correction unit 14 deletes the information indicating that the work item has been executed, which is associated with the work item, from the inspection result storage unit 11. That is, the inspection result correcting unit 14 performs, for example, an operation corresponding to the cancellation of the check mark erroneously applied to the work item determined to be not executed.

The display control unit 15 controls the operation of the display unit 6. The display control unit 15 causes the display unit 6 to display, for example, an inspection list based on the inspection list data. The display control unit 15 causes the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 to reflect the determination result of the validity determination unit 13, for example, and displays the information on the display unit 6. For example, when the validity determination unit 13 determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 indicates that the information on which the work item has been performed does not have validity, the display control unit 15 displays the information on the display unit 6 with emphasis on the work item.

Fig. 2 is a diagram showing an example of job configuration data according to embodiment 1. Fig. 2 shows, as an example, operation configuration data used for maintenance operation of an elevator.

The maintenance work of the elevator includes a spot inspection work of a device installed in a place where an elevator shaft or the like does not normally enter. Such a spot inspection operation may not be performed without going to a place where the device is actually installed. In addition, such a spot check operation may not be performed without performing a specific operation in advance. That is, there are logical rules: in the maintenance work of the elevator, the work for a certain point inspection object cannot be performed unless the work for a specific other point inspection object is performed. The job configuration data is set according to such a rule. In addition, the work configuration data can be set for building equipment other than the elevator in the same manner.

The operation configuration data shown in fig. 2 shows the inspection target in the maintenance operation of the elevator in units of "equipment", "location", "device", and "inspection content". Among these units, the units located on the left side of fig. 2 indicate the more comprehensive point inspection objects. Among these units, the more the unit located on the right side of fig. 2, the more specific the point inspection object. For example, "equipment" such as an elevator includes not only an elevator itself but also "places" such as a car and a hoistway as a point inspection target. For example, the "location" such as a hoistway includes not only the hoistway itself but also "parts" such as the top and each floor as the object of point inspection. For example, the "portion" of the top portion includes not only the top portion itself but also "devices" such as an upper limit switch and a top sheave as a point inspection target. For example, the "device" such as the upper limit switch includes specific "contents of point inspection" such as an operating state, an operating position, and an attachment state as an object of point inspection.

Thus, more specific point inspection objects are included in more general point inspection objects. Hereinafter, a general point inspection target including a specific point inspection target is also referred to as an "upper position" with respect to the specific point inspection target. Hereinafter, a specific point inspection object included in the collective point inspection objects is also referred to as a "lower level" with respect to the collective point inspection object. In other words, the operation configuration data hierarchically shows the point inspection objects in the maintenance operation of the building equipment as upper point inspection objects and lower point inspection objects included in the upper point inspection objects.

As shown in fig. 2, the job configuration data includes a "job ID". The "job ID" is set for each of the point inspection objects belonging to the "point inspection content". That is, the "job ID" is set in the job configuration data for each point inspection object belonging to the lowest layer. In fig. 2, the point inspection objects such as elevators, cars, hoistways, ceilings, and floors belonging to a plurality of floors also belong to the lowest floor. The "job ID" is identification information showing a job item corresponding to a point inspection object belonging to the "point inspection content".

As shown in fig. 2, the job configuration data includes a "reference condition number" indicated by a number # symbol. The "reference condition number" is set for each "job ID". That is, the "reference condition number" is set for each point inspection object belonging to the lowest layer in the job configuration data. Therefore, the "reference condition numbers" of a plurality of point inspection targets included in the same higher-order point inspection target are not necessarily the same.

Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the checklist data according to embodiment 1. Fig. 3 shows, as an example, checklist data used for maintenance work of an elevator.

As shown in fig. 3, the checklist data includes a "reference condition number", a "check item", and a "job ID". The "check item" is a job item indicated by the "job ID". That is, the "inspection item" shows a job item corresponding to a point inspection object belonging to the lowest layer in the job configuration data. According to the example of fig. 3, the work items that can be performed by the power failure lamp device during the maintenance work of the elevator are spot checks of the operating state. According to the example of fig. 3, the work items that can be performed on the upper limit switch during the maintenance work of the elevator are the spot check of the operating state, the spot check of the operating position, and the spot check of the mounting state.

Fig. 4 is a diagram showing an example of data corresponding to the determination method of embodiment 1. Fig. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the determination method data according to embodiment 1. Fig. 5 shows, as an example, determination method data used in maintenance work of an elevator.

As shown in fig. 4, the determination method correspondence data shows "determination method IDs" corresponding to the respective "job IDs". As shown in fig. 5, the determination method data includes "determination method ID", "determination method", and "reliability" that are associated with each other. The "determination method ID" is identification information showing the "determination method". The "determination method" is a method for determining whether or not a work item indicated by the "job ID" having a correspondence relationship with the "determination method ID" in the determination method correspondence data has been executed. The "determination method" is defined in the determination method data by, for example, an expression indicating whether or not the information indicating the execution of the work item is appropriate. The "reliability" is an index showing how reliable the determination result using the "determination method" is. In fig. 5, "reliability" is expressed by three-level evaluation of low, medium, or high. "reliability" may be expressed, for example, in terms of probability.

The "determination method" in the determination method-associated data is defined as being capable of directly determining an executed work item from electronic data acquired from the building equipment, among the work items for the maintenance work. For a work item that cannot be directly determined from electronic data, a "determination method" is not defined in the determination method correspondence data.

The validity determination unit 13 also determines a work item for which a corresponding "determination method" is not defined. When the "determination method" for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit 13 determines the validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed, in accordance with the "determination method" for another work item corresponding to a point inspection object belonging to the lowest hierarchy and included in the upper point inspection object of the point inspection objects corresponding to the work item in the work configuration data. That is, the validity determination unit 13 determines that the work item for which the corresponding "determination method" is not defined is the "determination method" for another work item. The validity determination unit 13 uses the "determination method" for the other work items based on the preset reference condition. In addition, when there is no other "determination method" that can be used, the determination result of the validity determination unit 13 is "no validity determination".

The reference condition is a condition indicating a wide range of the degree to which the "determination method" used when determining the work item can be selected. The reference condition is set for each "reference condition number". That is, the reference condition is set for each "job ID" in the job configuration data.

Fig. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of the reference conditions in embodiment 1. In the example shown in fig. 6, five reference conditions of #1 to #5 are defined. Reference conditions will be described below on the premise of the contents of various data illustrated in fig. 2 to 5.

Referring to fig. 6, reference condition #1 indicates that only the set "job ID" can be referred to. The reference condition #1 is set only for the "job ID" indicating that the executed job item can be directly determined from the electronic data acquired from the building equipment. That is, the reference condition #1 is set only for the "job ID" corresponding to the "determination method ID" in which the "determination method" is defined in the determination method data. The validity determination unit 13 performs determination only using the "determination method" for the work item indicated by the "work ID" for which the reference condition #1 is set. The validity determination unit 13, for example, compares the "job ID": c0011, the operating state spot check of the blackout lamp device, according to "determination method ID": the "determination method" shown in RC0011 makes a determination.

Referring to fig. 6, reference condition #2 indicates that another "job ID" set for another "checkup content" included in the same "device" can also be referred to. The validity determination unit 13 may use, as the job item indicated by the "job ID" in which the reference condition #2 is set, a "determination method" for determining the job item to be executed directly from the electronic data among the job items corresponding to the other "contents of point inspection" included in the same "device". For example, for the "job ID" to which the reference condition #2 is set: in the spot inspection of the mounted state of the upper limit switch shown in H9913, "determination method" is not defined in the determination method data. However, the "job ID" set for the other "contents of click" included in the same "device" is: the operating state spot inspection of the upper limit switch shown in H9911 defines "determination method". Therefore, the validity determination unit 13 compares the "job ID": the installation state spot inspection of the upper limit switch shown in H9913 is performed, for example, in accordance with "determination method ID": the judgment was performed by the "judgment method" shown in RH 9911.

Referring to fig. 6, reference condition #3 indicates that another "job ID" set for another "point inspection content" included in the same "location" can also be referred to. For example, for the "job ID" to which the reference condition #3 is set: the visual appearance state spot inspection of the top sheave shown in H9921 does not define "determination method" in the determination method data. Further, no "determination method" is defined for work items corresponding to other "contents of click" included in the same "device". However, the "job ID" set for the other "spot check content" included in the same "site": h9900 and "job ID": the work item indicated by H9911 defines "determination method". Therefore, the validity determination unit 13 compares the "job ID": the visual state of the top sheave indicated by H9921 is checked, for example, in accordance with "determination method ID": the judgment was performed by the "judgment method" shown in RH 9911.

Referring to fig. 6, reference condition #4 indicates that another "job ID" set for another "checkup content" included in the same "location" can also be referred to. For example, in the case of the pair "job ID": when the reference condition #4 is set in H9921 instead of the reference condition #3, the validity determination unit 13 compares the "job ID": the visual state spot inspection of the top sheave shown in H9921 can be performed in accordance with "determination method ID": the judgment is performed by a "judgment method" shown in RH 0000.

Referring to fig. 6, reference condition #5 indicates that another "job ID" set for another "contents of point inspection" included in the top point inspection object can also be referred to. That is, the reference condition #5 indicates that another "job ID" set for another "checkup content" included in the same "device" can also be referred to. For example, in the case of the pair "job ID": when the reference condition #5 is set in H9921 instead of the reference condition #3, the validity determination unit 13 compares the "job ID": the visual state spot inspection of the top sheave shown in H9921 can be performed in accordance with "determination method ID": the "determination method" shown in RW0000 performs the determination.

In addition, when there are a plurality of "determination methods" for the work items indicated by the other "work IDs" that can be referred to under the reference condition, for example, the "determination method" with the highest "reliability" may be selected. In this case, for example, the "determination method" having the smallest numerical value included in the "determination method ID" may be selected. In this case, for example, the "determination method" having the largest numerical value included in the "determination method ID" may be selected. In this case, for example, a "determination method ID" specified in advance may be selected.

Fig. 7 is a diagram showing an example of display of the checklist according to embodiment 1. The checklist is displayed on the display unit 6 by the display control unit 15 based on the checklist data, for example. The checklist includes check boxes corresponding to the respective "check items".

The maintenance worker inputs a check mark to the check box corresponding to the "inspection item" recognized as having been implemented by performing an input operation on the operation unit 5. The inspection result storage unit 11 stores the presence/absence of a check mark as an inspection result for each "inspection item". The validity determination unit 13 determines the validity of all the "inspection items" that have been inspected and are included in the inspection result. The validity determination unit 13 generates validity determination result data.

Fig. 8 is a diagram showing an example of validity determination result data according to embodiment 1.

As shown in fig. 8, the validity determination result data includes "inspection items", "inspections by maintenance workers", "validity determination results", and "determination result reliability" that are associated with each other. The "inspection by the maintenance worker" indicates the presence or absence of a check mark based on an input operation to the operation unit 5. The "validity determination result" indicates the validity of the check mark associated with the "check item". The "result of validity determination" includes any one of "validity", "non-validity", and "non-validity determination". In fig. 8, "determination of non-validity" is represented by a symbol "-". The "determination result reliability" is the "reliability" of the "determination method" used for the validity determination of the "inspection item".

The inspection result correction unit 14 deletes the check mark associated with the "inspection item" for which the "validity determination result" is "not valid" from the inspection result in the validity determination result data, thereby correcting the inspection result. However, when the "determination result reliability" associated with the "inspection item" is lower than the preset reliability threshold, the inspection result correcting unit 14 does not delete the check mark associated with the "inspection item" from the inspection result. The reliability threshold can be changed by, for example, a maintenance worker operating the operation unit 5.

The display control unit 15 causes the display unit 6 to display the "validity determination result" as the inspection result. The display control unit 15 displays the examination result with emphasis on the "examination item" whose "validity determination result" is "not" when the examination result is displayed. For example, the background color or character color of the "inspection item" is highlighted by coloring or blinking. However, when the "determination result reliability" associated with the "inspection item" is lower than a preset reliability threshold, the display control unit 15 displays the "inspection item" with no emphasis.

Fig. 9 is a diagram showing a display example of the inspection result reflecting the validity determination result in embodiment 1. Fig. 9 shows a case where the reliability threshold is set to "medium".

As shown in fig. 9, the installation state spot check of the upper limit switch in the "inspection item" in which the "validity determination result" is "not valid" is highlighted, but a check mark is not marked. This is because the "determination result reliability" of the mounting state spot check of the upper limit switch is not lower than the reliability threshold. That is, if the "determination result reliability" associated with the "inspection item" is not lower than the reliability threshold, it is predicted that the "inspection by the maintenance worker" is erroneous.

As shown in fig. 9, the three types of point inspections of the top sheave in the "inspection item" in which the "validity determination result" is "not" are marked with check marks, but are not highlighted. This is because the "determination result reliability" of these three kinds of spot checks is lower than the reliability threshold. That is, when the "determination result reliability" associated with the "inspection item" is lower than the reliability threshold, the "inspection by the maintenance worker" is respected.

Fig. 10 is a first flowchart showing an example of the operation of the maintenance work management apparatus according to embodiment 1.

The validity determination unit 13 obtains the inspection result from the inspection result storage unit 11 (step S101). The validity determination unit 13 acquires electronic data from the electronic data acquisition unit 12 (step S102). The validity determination unit 13 extracts the "inspection item" that has been inspected from the inspection result (step S103). The validity determination unit 13 determines whether or not validity has been determined for all the "inspection items" that have been inspected (step S104).

If it is determined in step S104 that the validity has not been determined for all the "inspection items" that have been inspected, the validity determination unit 13 selects the "inspection item" that has not been determined (step S105). The validity determination unit 13 determines validity of the selected "inspection item" (step S106). If it is determined in step S104 that the validity has been determined for all the "inspection items" that have been inspected, the inspection result reflecting the validity determination result is displayed (step S107).

Fig. 11 is a second flowchart illustrating an example of the operation of the maintenance work management apparatus according to embodiment 1. Fig. 11 is a diagram showing a specific case of the processing of step S106 in fig. 10.

The validity determination unit 13 refers to the "job ID" indicating the "inspection item" selected in step S105 based on the inspection list data (step S201). The validity determination unit 13 refers to the "determination method ID" corresponding to the "job ID" based on the determination method correspondence data (step S202). The validity determination unit 13 refers to the "determination method" indicated by the "determination method ID" based on the determination method data (step S203). The validity determination unit 13 determines whether or not the "determination method" is undefined (step S204).

If it is determined in step S204 that the "determination method" is undefined, the validity determination unit 13 determines whether or not there is another "job ID" that has not been referred to (step S205). When it is determined in step S205 that there is another "job ID" that has not been referred to, the validity determination unit 13 refers to another "job ID" that satisfies the reference condition set for the "job ID" indicating the "inspection item" selected in step S105, based on the job configuration data (step S206). After the process of step S206, the validity determination unit 13 performs the process of step S202.

If it is determined in step S204 that the "determination method" is not undefined, the validity determination unit 13 determines validity in accordance with the "determination method" (step S207). If it is determined in step S205 that there is no other "job ID" not yet referred to, the validity determination unit 13 sets the "validity determination result" to "no validity determination" (step S208).

In embodiment 1, when the "determination method" for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit 13 determines the validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed, in accordance with the "determination method" for another work item corresponding to the lower-level pointing object included in the job configuration data among the upper-level pointing objects of the pointing objects corresponding to the work item. Therefore, according to embodiment 1, the validity of the check mark provided by the maintenance operator can be determined even if the executed work item cannot be directly determined from the electronic data acquired from the building equipment. As a result, it is possible to prevent the non-executed work items from being erroneously recorded as executed.

In embodiment 1, when the "determination method" for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit 13 determines the validity of the information indicating that the work item has been executed, in accordance with the "determination method" for another work item corresponding to a point inspection object included in an upper point inspection object of the point inspection object and belonging to the lowest hierarchy within a range indicated by a reference condition set in advance for the point inspection object corresponding to the work item in the work configuration data. Therefore, according to embodiment 1, it is possible to appropriately set a range of "determination methods" that are used to determine a work item that cannot be determined directly from electronic data. As a result, it is possible to prevent the non-executed work items from being erroneously recorded as executed.

In embodiment 1, when the validity determination unit 13 determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 indicates that the information indicating that the work item has been executed is not valid, the inspection result correction unit 14 deletes the information indicating that the work item is executed, which is associated with the work item, from the inspection result storage unit 11. Therefore, according to embodiment 1, the check mark erroneously marked on the unproductive work item is automatically corrected. As a result, it is possible to prevent the non-executed work items from being erroneously recorded as executed.

In embodiment 1, even when the validity determination unit 13 determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 indicates that the information indicating that the work item has been executed is not valid, the inspection result revision unit 14 does not delete the information indicating that the work item has been executed, which is associated with the work item, from the inspection result storage unit 11 when the reliability of the "determination method" used for the determination is lower than a predetermined reference. Therefore, according to embodiment 1, the reliability of the "determination method" used for the determination is higher than the reliability of the determination result, and the inspection by the maintenance worker is respected. As a result, it is possible to prevent the check mark that correctly marks the executed work item from being corrected.

In embodiment 1, when the validity determination unit 13 determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 indicates that the information on which the work item has been performed does not have validity, the display control unit 15 displays the information on the display unit 6 with emphasis on the work item. Therefore, according to embodiment 1, it is possible to warn the maintenance worker that the check mark is erroneously marked for the non-performed work item. As a result, it is possible to prevent the non-executed work items from being erroneously recorded as executed.

In embodiment 1, even when the validity determination unit 13 determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit 11 indicates that the information on which the work item has been executed does not have validity, the display control unit 15 displays the information on the display unit 6 without highlighting the work item when the reliability of the determination method used for the determination is lower than a predetermined criterion. Therefore, according to embodiment 1, the reliability of the "determination method" used for the determination is used, and the inspection by the maintenance worker is respected in comparison with the determination result of the validity. As a result, it is possible to prevent unnecessary warning from being given to the maintenance worker even if the check mark has been correctly marked for the executed work item.

In embodiment 1, the job configuration data, the checklist data, the determination method correspondence data, and the determination method data may be stored in a storage unit, not shown, included in the maintenance job management apparatus 3. The work configuration data acquisition unit 7 can acquire the work configuration data from the storage unit. The checklist data acquiring unit 8 can acquire checklist data from the storage unit. The determination method-related data acquisition unit 9 may acquire the determination method-related data from the storage unit. The determination method data acquiring unit 10 may acquire the determination method data from the storage unit.

In embodiment 1, the validity determination unit 13 may determine whether or not the "inspection item" included in the inspection result is implemented based on the electronic data, with respect to the "inspection item" not under inspection. When the "inspection item" that is not inspected is determined to be implemented, the inspection result correcting unit 14 may associate the "inspection item" with a check mark. That is, the maintenance work management apparatus 3 may automatically mark a check mark for the "inspection item" for which the maintenance worker has forgotten to mark a check mark.

The function of the maintenance work management apparatus 3 in embodiment 1 can be installed in an elevator system, for example. In this case, the operation section 5 and the display section 6 may be, for example, touch panels installed in a hall of an elevator, a car, a machine room, or the like.

The maintenance work management system according to embodiment 1 can be applied to, for example, building equipment such as air conditioning equipment and lighting equipment. In order to perform maintenance work for the air conditioners or the lighting devices, it is necessary for a maintenance worker to enter a floor, a room, a roof, or the like on which the targeted air conditioners or lighting devices are installed. Therefore, for example, in an air conditioner or an illumination device installed in a building to which an entrance/exit management system is applied, the validity of information indicating that various work items have been performed can be determined from a record of entry of a maintenance worker to a floor, a room, a roof, or the like. The validity of the information indicating the various work items performed may be determined, for example, by the connection of the maintenance work management apparatus 3 to a control panel of an air conditioner or an illumination device and the operation of the maintenance work management apparatus 3. The validity of the information indicating that the work item has been performed in the maintenance work of the air-conditioning equipment can be directly determined from electronic data indicating that the special operation of the air-conditioning equipment has been performed for spot inspection, for example.

The maintenance work management system according to embodiment 1 can be applied to an escalator, for example. In order to perform maintenance work on the escalator, it is necessary for a maintenance worker to enter the upper, intermediate, and lower portions of the truss. Whether or not the maintenance worker has entered the upper portion of the truss may be directly determined by, for example, an operation of a control panel and the presence or absence of manual operation. Whether or not the maintenance worker has entered the middle portion and the lower portion of the truss cannot be determined directly, and therefore, determination is continued by, for example, a method for determining the upper portion of the truss. In this way, the maintenance work management system can determine the validity of information indicating that various work items have been performed in the maintenance work of the escalator.

The functions of the work configuration data acquisition unit 7, the inspection list data acquisition unit 8, the determination method correspondence data acquisition unit 9, the determination method data acquisition unit 10, the inspection result storage unit 11, the electronic data acquisition unit 12, the validity determination unit 13, the inspection result correction unit 14, and the display control unit 15 in the maintenance work management apparatus 3 are realized by processing circuits. The processing circuitry may be dedicated hardware 50. The processing circuit may have a processor 51 and a memory 52. The processing circuitry may be formed in part as dedicated hardware 50 and further have a processor 51 and a memory 52. Fig. 12 shows an example in which the processing circuit is a part formed as dedicated hardware 50, and further has a processor 51 and a memory 52.

Where at least a portion of the processing circuitry is at least one dedicated hardware 50, the processing circuitry is, for example, a single circuit, a composite circuit, a programmed processor, a parallel programmed processor, an ASIC, an FPGA, or a combination thereof.

When the processing circuit includes at least one processor 51 and at least one memory 52, the functions of the job configuration data acquisition unit 7, the checklist data acquisition unit 8, the determination method-related data acquisition unit 9, the determination method data acquisition unit 10, the inspection result storage unit 11, the electronic data acquisition unit 12, the validity determination unit 13, the inspection result specification unit 14, and the display control unit 15 are realized by software, firmware, or a combination of software and firmware. The software and firmware are described as programs and stored in the memory 52. The processor 51 realizes the functions of the respective parts by reading out and executing the programs stored in the memory 52. The processor 51 is also called a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a Central Processing Unit, a Processing Unit, an arithmetic Unit, a microprocessor, a microcomputer, or a DSP. Examples of the Memory 52 include nonvolatile or volatile semiconductor memories such as a RAM (Random Access Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a flash Memory, an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), and the like, a magnetic Disk, a flexible Disk, an optical Disk, a compact Disk, a mini Disk, and a DVD (Digital Versatile Disk).

In this way, the processing circuit can realize the functions of the maintenance job management apparatus 3 by hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof.

Industrial applicability

As described above, the present invention can be applied to building equipment.

Description of the reference symbols

1, controlling a disc; 2, an information center; 3 maintaining the operation management device; 4 a central storage part; 5 an operation part; 6 a display unit; 7 an operation configuration data acquisition unit; 8 a check list data acquisition unit; 9 a determination method correspondence data acquisition unit; 10 a determination method data acquisition unit; 11 an inspection result storage unit; 12 an electronic data acquisition unit; 13 a validity determination unit; 14 an inspection result correcting section; 15 a display control unit; 50 dedicated hardware; 51 a processor; 52 memory.

Claims

1. A maintenance work management apparatus, wherein the maintenance work management apparatus has:

a work configuration data acquisition unit that acquires work configuration data in which work configuration data is hierarchically shown in a manner that a point inspection object in a maintenance work for the building equipment is an upper point inspection object and a lower point inspection object included in the upper point inspection object;

a checklist data acquisition unit that acquires checklist data showing a job item corresponding to a point inspection target belonging to a lowest layer in the job configuration data;

a determination method data acquisition unit that acquires determination method data indicating a determination method for determining whether or not a work item indicated by the checklist data has been performed, based on electronic data that can be acquired from the building equipment;

an inspection result storage unit that stores information indicating that the work item indicated by the inspection list data has been executed in association with the work item, in accordance with an input operation by a maintenance worker; and

a validity determination unit that determines validity of information indicating that a work item has been performed, among the information stored in the inspection result storage unit, in accordance with the electronic data acquired from the building equipment and the determination method indicated by the determination method data,

when the determination method for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit determines validity of information indicating that the work item has been executed, according to the following determination method: the determination method is a determination method for another work item corresponding to a higher-level object to be checked out of the objects to be checked out corresponding to the work item and a lower-level object to be checked out belonging to the lowest-level object to be checked out of the work configuration data.

2. The maintenance work management apparatus according to claim 1,

when the determination method for the work item stored in the inspection result storage unit is not included in the determination method data, the validity determination unit determines validity of information indicating that the work item has been executed, according to the following determination method: the determination method is a determination method for another work item corresponding to a point inspection object included in an upper point inspection object of the point inspection object and belonging to a lowest layer within a range indicated by a reference condition set in advance for the point inspection object corresponding to the work item.

3. The maintenance work management apparatus according to claim 1 or 2,

the maintenance work management device includes:

an operation unit that accepts an input operation showing information that the work item shown in the checklist data has been executed;

a display unit that displays information; and

and a display control unit that causes the information stored in the inspection result storage unit to reflect the determination result of the validity determination unit, and causes the display unit to display the information.

4. The maintenance work management apparatus according to claim 3,

when the validity determination unit determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit indicates that the information on which the work item has been performed does not have validity, the display control unit displays the information on the display unit with emphasis on the work item.

5. The maintenance work management apparatus according to claim 4,

even if the validity determination unit determines that the information stored in the inspection result storage unit indicates that the information on which the work item has been performed does not have validity, the display control unit causes the display unit not to highlight the work item when the information is displayed, when the reliability of the determination method used for the determination is lower than a predetermined reference.

6. The maintenance work management apparatus according to claim 1 or 2,

the maintenance work management apparatus includes an inspection result correcting unit configured to delete information indicating that a work item has been executed, which is associated with the work item, from the inspection result storage unit when the validity determining unit determines that the information indicating that the work item has been executed does not have validity, among the information stored in the inspection result storage unit.

7. The maintenance work management apparatus according to claim 6,

even if the validity determination unit determines that the information indicating that the work item has been implemented, among the information stored in the inspection result storage unit, does not have validity, the inspection result correction unit does not delete the information indicating that the work item has been implemented, which is associated with the work item, from the inspection result storage unit when the reliability of the determination method used in the determination is lower than a predetermined reference.