CN108734783B - Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support - Google Patents

Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108734783B
CN108734783B CN201810491587.9A CN201810491587A CN108734783B CN 108734783 B CN108734783 B CN 108734783B CN 201810491587 A CN201810491587 A CN 201810491587A CN 108734783 B CN108734783 B CN 108734783B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
skin
cartilage
ear support
model
selecting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201810491587.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108734783A (en
Inventor
黄文华
钟静
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Southern Medical University
Original Assignee
Southern Medical University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Southern Medical University filed Critical Southern Medical University
Priority to CN201810491587.9A priority Critical patent/CN108734783B/en
Publication of CN108734783A publication Critical patent/CN108734783A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108734783B publication Critical patent/CN108734783B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T17/00Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
    • G06T17/20Finite element generation, e.g. wire-frame surface description, tesselation
    • G06T17/205Re-meshing
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2002/5001Cosmetic coverings
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004Biomedical image processing
    • G06T2207/30052Implant; Prosthesis

Abstract

A method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support comprises S1, scanning the ear support to obtain the contour data of the ear support; s2, importing the entity model into the geomagic FreeFrom & touch X software for surface repairing; s3, generating a Nurbs curved surface; s4, importing the IGES format of the step S3 into HyperMesh14.0 software to establish a finite element model; s5, importing the three-dimensional finite element ear model containing cartilage and different skin thicknesses obtained in the step S4 into a finite element professional analysis software Abaqus for finite element analysis; and S6, obtaining stress-strain analysis results of cartilage, skin, cartilage deformation and skin deformation, and judging the rupture risk of the ear support according to the finite element stress result. The method can be used for pre-evaluating the possible rupture condition of the ear support in use, and the rupture probability is reduced.

Description

Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of 3D plastic digital medicine, in particular to a method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support.
Background
The incidence rate of the small ear deformity is remarkably increased all over the world, the incidence rate in China is recently reported to be 5.18/10000, and compared with the prior art, the incidence rate is greatly increased, more men than women are, most of the men are unilateral, and the incidence rate on the right side is higher than that on the left side. The external auricle is positioned on both sides of the skull, because the external auricle has no specific function, the external auricle is often ignored, but due to the loss of the ears of the patient, besides the wearing of accessories such as glasses, masks and the like, the external auricle is also often jeopardized in appearance, the hearing of the patient can be influenced, the physiological and psychological burden of the patient is increased, and the normal growth and development of the sick children can be influenced particularly.
For the treatment of small ear deformity, the relatively lifelike auricle bracket is usually carved clinically, and then the carved auricle bracket is implanted into the corresponding part.
Because congenital small ear deformity auricle deletion is serious, the residual ear is basically a small skin tag and lacks of an anatomical structure, it is very important to carve a vivid external auricle to help the patient recover confidence. The average size of the normal external auricle of a human body is about 33mmx55mm, the most anterior external auricle is an helix, an external helix and an earlobe, the middle part is an antihelical complex, the bottom layer is an concha cavity complex, and the three-dimensional structure of the high-low and semi-spiral is presented, the local anatomical structures are basically more than 13, including the external helix, the periauricular, the upper and lower crus of antihelical lobe, triangular fossa, concha cavity, cymba concha, tragus and antitragus, and the like, so the external auricle is the most complex three-dimensional structure and the smallest body surface organ of the human body, and the ear reconstruction operation is always a challenge of an orthopedic surgeon, and the difficulty lies in the complexity of the self anatomical structure of the external auricle, the selection of bracket materials and the chirality of postoperative complication treatment.
Although the development for a period of time has greatly developed the fidelity of the structure of the ear support and the selection range of the support material, the complication of the ulceration of the ear support cannot be completely avoided after the operation. The ulceration factors include local overstrain, skin flap blood circulation disorder, local infection, skin flap compression and the like, and the local overstrain is one of the reasons for the ulceration of the ear support. Clinicians have conducted a great deal of research on how to carve a vivid external auricle, but neglect whether the carved structure of the ear support itself has the problems of skin ulceration and support exposure.
Therefore, in view of the deficiencies of the prior art, it is necessary to provide a method for determining the risk of rupture in advance of the engraved ear support, so as to avoid the risk of rupture as much as possible.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to avoid the defects of the prior art and provides a method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support, which can be used for pre-evaluating and analyzing the situation that the ear support is likely to be ruptured in use to obtain a part where the ruptured ear support is likely to rupture.
The above object of the present invention is achieved by the following technical means.
The method for judging the ulceration risk of the reconstructed ear scaffold specifically comprises the following steps:
s1, scanning the primary ear support body to obtain the contour data of the primary ear support body;
s2, importing the entity model of the primary ear support body in the STL format obtained in the step S1 into a geogenic free from and touch X software for surface restoration, and storing the entity model after surface restoration in the STL format;
s3, importing the STL format stored by the entity model after the curved surface is repaired in the step S2 into the Geomagic Wrap software, and selecting the commands as follows in sequence: the method comprises the following steps of (1) accurately curving a surface, automatically curving, constructing a contour line, constructing a surface sheet, constructing a grating, fitting a surface, finally generating a Nurbs curved surface, and exporting and storing the generated Nurbs curved surface in an IGES format;
s4, importing the Nurbs curved surface in the IGES format obtained in the step S3 into HyperMesh14.0 software for establishing a finite element model, and specifically comprising the following steps:
s4.1, opening Hypermesh software, and importing the Nurbs curved surface in the IGES format in the step S3 into the HyperMesh14.0 software;
s4.2, carrying out entity grid division;
s5, importing the three-dimensional finite element ear model containing cartilage and different skin thicknesses obtained in the step S4 into a finite element professional analysis software Abaqus for finite element analysis;
and S6, obtaining stress-strain analysis results of cartilage, skin, cartilage deformation and skin deformation, and judging the rupture risk of the primary body of the ear support according to the finite element stress result.
Preferably, in step S1, the carved primary ear support body is placed on a sterile table, and the sterilized positioning target points are attached to the periphery of the primary ear support body on the sterile table, and a handheld three-dimensional scanner of handscan700 is used to scan the primary ear support body with a precision of 0.03mm and a measurement rate of 480,000 times/second, so as to obtain the profile data of the primary ear support body.
Preferably, step S4.2, the entity grid division is performed, which specifically includes:
a1: carrying out entity mesh division on a Nurbs curved surface which is created after a contour line is constructed in the Geomagic Wrap software; the method comprises the following steps: importing a Nurbs curved surface in an IGES format into Hypermesh software, entering a Geom-2D panel, selecting an automatic gridding subcommand, selecting a surface to be generated, setting the size and the type of a grid, clicking a segmentation command, segmenting, and adjusting a 2D grid with an angle or length-width ratio which is not in conformity with the requirements of the angle and the length-width ratio;
b1: clicking the view grid quality tool, selecting the 2-D command, and checking the 2D grid of step A1;
c1, generating tetrahedral and hexahedral solid grids;
d1: connecting the model suture positions according to an intraoperative collection suture method;
e1: and selecting the stitched entity grids before framing through a face command, clicking to execute a face searching command, offsetting skin thickness by the grid on the surface of the rib to simulate human skin, and clicking a 3D grid generation tool to generate the entity grids with different skin thicknesses.
Preferably, step E1 specifically generates a solid mesh with a skin thickness of 0.5mm, 1mm, 2 mm.
Preferably, step S5 specifically includes:
a2, creating a skin part and a cartilage part, wherein the skin part and the cartilage part are of the types: entity, homogeneous; the materials of the skin part and the cartilage part are respectively selected from skin and costal cartilage;
when the skin and the cartilage are endowed with the attributes respectively, a skin group is created to store the skin grid, then a skin group removing command is selected to remove the previously created skin grid, and after the cartilage is left, different material attributes are endowed to the cartilage and the skin;
b2, selecting an assembly module command, and assembling and determining the skin model and the cartilage model;
c2, selecting step module commands, and then selecting static and single-factor analysis commands;
d2, setting the model tangential behavior to frictionless;
e2, reload boundary conditions;
e21, creating boundary conditions: setting boundary conditions to be simulated according to the fixed positions of the auricular cartilage and the skin of the human body, and enabling six degrees of freedom of the space at the fixed positions to be zero;
e22, giving gravity-9800 mm/s-2
E23, giving Pressure negative Pressure suction force of 0.02 Mpa;
f2, determining the grid to be divided into entity grids;
g2, and carrying out analysis.
Preferably, the primary ear support body is an ear support body carved with the ribs of the target object, or a Medpor model or a Nagata model.
Preferably, step D1 is specifically: clicking to fix, then clicking to select an independent computing mode and an element type, selecting a node according to an intraoperative stitching mode, and finally clicking to create an instruction to create a model.
According to the method for judging the ulceration risk of the reconstructed ear support, disclosed by the invention, the risk of the ulceration of the ear support is judged through the simulation analysis of the exposed stress-strain of the ear support on the morphological structure, so that a reference direction is provided for the optimization of the ear support.
Drawings
The technical solution of the present invention is further described with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the contents in the drawings are not to be construed as limiting the present invention.
Fig. 1 is a schematic structural view of a pre-engraved ear mount of embodiment 2 of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is an original image acquired by a scanner.
FIG. 3 is an image after surface remediation by geographic FreeFrom & touch X software.
FIG. 4 is the solid mesh image generated after step C1;
FIG. 5 is an image generated after step D1 is performed;
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of one thickness of skin produced;
FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of the creation of a boundary condition at step E21;
FIG. 8 is an analysis of cartilage stress and skin stress for different thicknesses of skin;
FIG. 9 is an analysis of cartilage deformation and skin deformation for different thicknesses of skin;
fig. 10 is an original image acquired by a scanner in embodiment 3.
FIG. 11 is an image after surface remediation by the geographic FreeFrom & touch X software in example 3.
FIG. 12 is a solid mesh image generated after step C21 in example 3;
FIG. 13 is a graph of the analysis of cartilage stress and skin stress for different thicknesses of skin in example 3;
FIG. 14 is an analysis chart of cartilage deformation and skin deformation for different thicknesses of skin in example 3.
Detailed Description
The technical solution of the present invention is further illustrated by the following examples.
Example 1.
A method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support comprises the following steps:
s1, scanning the primary ear support body to obtain the contour data of the primary ear support body;
s2, importing the entity model of the primary ear support body in the STL format obtained in the step S1 into a geogenic free from and touch X software for surface restoration, and storing the entity model after surface restoration in the STL format;
s3, importing the STL format stored by the entity model after the curved surface is repaired in the step S2 into the Geomagic Wrap software, and selecting the commands as follows in sequence: the method comprises the following steps of (1) accurately curving a surface, automatically curving, constructing a contour line, constructing a surface sheet, constructing a grating, fitting a surface, finally generating a Nurbs curved surface, and exporting and storing the generated Nurbs curved surface in an IGES format;
s4, importing the Nurbs curved surface in the IGES format obtained in the step S3 into HyperMesh14.0 software for establishing a finite element model, and specifically comprising the following steps:
s4.1, opening Hypermesh software, and importing the Nurbs curved surface in the IGES format in the step S3 into the HyperMesh14.0 software;
s4.2, carrying out entity grid division;
s5, importing the three-dimensional finite element ear model containing cartilage and different skin thicknesses obtained in the step S4 into a finite element professional analysis software Abaqus for finite element analysis;
and S6, obtaining stress-strain analysis results of cartilage, skin, cartilage deformation and skin deformation, and judging the rupture risk of the primary body of the ear support according to the finite element stress result.
Specifically, in step S1, the carved primary ear support body is placed on a sterile table, and the sterilized positioning target points are attached to the periphery of the primary ear support body on the sterile table, and then scanned by a handheld handscan700 three-dimensional scanner at a precision of 0.03mm and a measurement rate of 480,000 times/second, so as to obtain the profile data of the primary ear support body.
Step S4.2, entity meshing is performed, which specifically includes:
a1: carrying out entity mesh division on a Nurbs curved surface which is created after a contour line is constructed in the Geomagic Wrap software; the method comprises the following steps: importing a Nurbs curved surface in an IGES format into Hypermesh software, entering a Geom-2D panel, selecting an automatic gridding subcommand, selecting a surface to be generated, setting the size and the type of a grid, clicking a segmentation command, segmenting, and adjusting a 2D grid with an angle or length-width ratio which is not in conformity with the requirements of the angle and the length-width ratio;
b1: clicking the view grid quality tool, selecting the 2-D command, and checking the 2D grid of step A1;
c1, generating tetrahedral and hexahedral solid grids;
d1: connecting the model suture positions according to an intraoperative collection suture method;
e1: and selecting the stitched entity grids before framing through a face command, clicking to execute a face searching command, offsetting skin thickness by the grid on the surface of the rib to simulate human skin, and clicking a 3D grid generation tool to generate the entity grids with different skin thicknesses.
Wherein, step S5 specifically includes:
a2, creating a skin part and a cartilage part, wherein the skin part and the cartilage part are of the types: entity, homogeneous; the materials of the skin part and the cartilage part are respectively selected from skin and costal cartilage;
when the skin and the cartilage are endowed with the attributes respectively, a skin group is created to store the skin grid, then a skin group removing command is selected to remove the previously created skin grid, and after the cartilage is left, different material attributes are endowed to the cartilage and the skin;
b2, selecting an assembly module command, and assembling and determining the skin model and the cartilage model;
c2, selecting step module commands, and then selecting static and single-factor analysis commands;
d2, setting the model tangential behavior to frictionless;
e2, reload boundary conditions;
e21, creating boundary conditions: setting boundary conditions to be simulated according to the fixed positions of the auricular cartilage and the skin of the human body, and enabling six degrees of freedom of the space at the fixed positions to be zero;
e22, giving gravity-9800 mm/s-2
E23, giving Pressure negative Pressure suction force of 0.02 Mpa;
f2, determining the grid to be divided into entity grids;
g2, and carrying out analysis.
Wherein, the step D1 is specifically: clicking to fix, then clicking to select an independent computing mode and an element type, selecting a node according to an intraoperative stitching mode, and finally clicking to create an instruction to create a model.
It should be noted that the ear support of the present invention may be an ear support carved with the ribs of the target object, or a Medpor model, or a Nagata model.
According to the method for judging the ulceration risk of the reconstructed ear support, disclosed by the invention, the risk of the ulceration of the ear support is judged through the simulation analysis of the exposed stress-strain of the ear support on the morphological structure, so that a reference direction is provided for the optimization of the ear support. The method of the invention, in addition to enabling aesthetic improvements, facilitates its morphological structural analysis from the biomechanical direction. The method establishes different skin thicknesses and negative pressure attractions, can be used for pre-judging the ulceration risk of the ear support by different ear supports carved by different doctors, different skin thicknesses and different negative pressure attractions, and performs optimization adjustment to obtain the finished ear support with low ulceration probability.
Example 2.
The method of the present invention is further illustrated by the application of a clinical sculpted ear mount model.
The ear support model of the embodiment is designed for congenital male 7-year-old infant, congenital right auricle deformity, wherein the remaining auricle is in a cumulus shape, and the graduation type of the auricle deformity is three degrees. The ear support has been specifically carved for its outer ear repair as shown in fig. 1, but the risk of ulceration is unknown. The method of the invention is adopted to judge the ulceration risk of the ear support.
The specific process is as follows:
s1, placing the carved ear support of FIG. 1 on a sterile table, pasting sterilized positioning target points around the ear support, and scanning with a hand-held handscan700 three-dimensional scanner with the precision of 0.03mm and the measurement speed of 480,000 times/second to obtain the contour data of the ear support, as shown in FIG. 2;
s2, importing the STL-format solid model of the ear support obtained in the step S1 into a geographic Freefrom & touch X software for curved surface restoration, and storing the solid model with the curved surface restored into the STL format, wherein the solid model with the curved surface restored is shown in FIG. 3;
s3, importing the STL format stored by the entity model after the curved surface is repaired in the step S2 into the Geomagic Wrap software, and selecting a command as follows: the method comprises the steps of accurately curving a surface, automatically curving, constructing a contour line, constructing a surface sheet, constructing a grating, fitting a surface, generating a Nurbs surface, and exporting and storing the Nurbs surface into an IGES format;
s4, importing the IGES format of the step S3 into HyperMesh14.0 software for establishing a finite element model, and specifically comprising the following steps:
s4.1, opening Hypermesh software, and importing the IGES format of the step S3 into the Hypermesh14.0 software;
s4.2, carrying out entity grid division; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
a1: constructing a contour line in the Geomagic Wrap software and then creating a Nurbs curved surface to divide a surface mesh; the method comprises the following steps: entering a Geom-2D panel, selecting an automesh sub-command, selecting surfs to be generated, setting element size and mesh type, clicking mesh, and adjusting non-conforming 2D grids;
b1: clicking TOOL-check elements to select a 2-D command, and checking the 2D grid drawn in the step A;
c1, clicking 3D-elemeffset and solid map to generate tetrahedral and hexahedral solid grids, as shown in FIG. 4;
d1: connecting the model suture positions by using RIGID according to an intraoperative collection suture method; the method comprises the following steps: clicking 1D-edges, independent-node, dependent-nodes, elem-types to select KINCOUP, selecting nodes according to an intraoperative stitching mode, and finally creating, as shown in FIG. 5;
e1: selecting the entity grids with good edges through a TOOL-faces command, clicking to execute a find faces command, offsetting the skin thickness from the grid on the surface of the rib to simulate the human skin, and clicking 3D-elemeoffset to generate entity grids with different skin thicknesses, wherein as shown in FIG. 6, the entity grids with the skin thicknesses of 0.5mm, 1mm and 2mm can be generated specifically;
s5, importing the three-dimensional finite element ear model containing cartilage and different skin thicknesses obtained in the step S4 into a finite element professional analysis software Abaqus for finite element analysis; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
a2, creating two sections as skin and costal cartilage respectively, and type: soild, Homogeneous; material selects skin and costal cartilage respectively; when skin and cartilage attributes are respectively given, firstly creating Display groups to store a skin grid, then selecting Remove select to Remove the previously created skin grid, and after cartilage is left, giving different material attributes to the cartilage and the skin;
in this example, the material property settings are shown in table one below.
Watch 1
Costal cartilage Skin(s)
Density (g/cm)3) 1.5 1.0
Modulus of elasticity (Mpa) 14.1 0.86
Poisson ratio 0.4 0.4
Ultimate tensile strength 6.2 5.17
B2, selecting a Module Module-assembly to enter create-instance, and clicking part-ok;
c2, selecting Module-STEP, and then selecting statics and single factor analysis;
d2, selecting Module-interaction, selecting Create interaction property, creating Contact, setting native viewer as frictionless, and normal viewer as Hard Contact and property;
e2, selecting Module-Load;
e21, creating boundary conditions: setting boundary conditions according to the simulation of the human auricular cartilage and skin fixing position, and enabling U1=U2=U3=UR1=UR2=UR3(ii) a As shown in fig. 7;
e22, giving gravity-9800 mm/s-2
E23, giving Pressure negative Pressure suction force of 0.02 Mpa;
f2, selecting a Module-Mesh, and determining C3D8R: An 8-node linear crack, reduced integration, ourglass control;
g2, selecting a Module Module-Job to enter an analysis stage to obtain the stress-strain analysis results of cartilage, skin, cartilage deformation and skin deformation, wherein the results are shown in fig. 8 and 9; as can be seen from the figure, the stress concentration sites are all skin and cartilage suture sites. According to the strain result graph, the positions where the model deformation occurs are all at the positions of the auricle fracture. The phenomenon is analyzed, the upper edge of the auricle external helix has weak supporting force due to the structure, the displacement between the skin and the cartilage at the position is the largest, and the reverse displacement causes local fatigue strain to cause skin ulceration.
By the method for judging the ulceration risk of the reconstructed ear support, the exposed stress-strain simulation analysis of the support on the morphological structure of the ear support can be judged, and the ulceration risk of the ear support can be judged, so that a reference direction is provided for the optimization of the ear support. The method of the invention, in addition to enabling aesthetic improvements, facilitates its morphological structural analysis from the biomechanical direction. The method establishes different skin thicknesses and negative pressure attractions, can be used for predicting the bursting risk of the ear support by different ear supports carved by different doctors, different skin thicknesses and different negative pressure attractions, and reduces the bursting probability to be small.
Example 3.
The ear support model of the present example is the one in example 2, which is directed to a 7-year-old congenital male infant, which has congenital right-small ear deformity, the remaining ear is in the shape of a cumulus, and the graduation type of the ear deformity is three degrees. The Medpor model is selected for its outer ear repair pertinence. The Medpor model was purchased from the Strker right ear implant, model 8328 and model 8330, from Provisions of Youqin Biotechnology Ltd; the internal structure of the ear implant is confirmed to be basically solid by adopting 64 rows of 128-layer CT scanning, and the external structure is scanned by adopting a Rexcan DS3 blue-light full-automatic three-dimensional scanner to obtain original data. The method provided by the invention is used for analyzing the bursting risk of the ear support and distinguishing whether optimization and improvement are needed.
The specific process is as follows:
s, performing ulceration risk analysis on the ear support, and performing optimization adjustment on the ear support according to the results of the ulceration risk analysis to obtain an ear support optimized body;
specifically, the step S of analyzing the risk of ulceration of the pre-engraved ear mount specifically includes:
s1, placing the Medpor ear support on a sterile table, pasting a sterilized positioning target point around the Medpor ear support, and scanning with a hand-held handscan700 three-dimensional scanner at a precision of 0.03mm and a measurement rate of 480,000 times/second to obtain the contour data of the ear support, as shown in FIG. 10;
s2, importing the STL-format solid model of the ear support obtained in the step S1 into a geographic Freefrom & touch X software for curved surface restoration, and storing the solid model with the curved surface restored into the STL format, wherein the solid model with the curved surface restored is shown in FIG. 11;
s3, importing the STL format stored by the entity model after the curved surface is repaired in the step S2 into the Geomagic Wrap software, and selecting a command as follows: the method comprises the steps of accurately curving a surface, automatically curving, constructing a contour line, constructing a surface sheet, constructing a grating, fitting a surface, generating a Nurbs surface, and exporting and storing the Nurbs surface into an IGES format;
s4, importing the IGES format of the step S3 into HyperMesh14.0 software for establishing a finite element model, and specifically comprising the following steps:
s4.1, opening Hypermesh software, and importing the IGES format of the step S3 into the Hypermesh14.0 software;
s4.2, carrying out entity grid division; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
a1: constructing a contour line in the Geomagic Wrap software and then creating a Nurbs curved surface to divide a surface mesh; the method comprises the following steps: entering a Geom-2D panel, selecting an automesh sub-command, selecting surfs to be generated, setting element size and mesh type, clicking mesh, and adjusting non-conforming 2D grids;
b1: clicking TOOL-check elements to select a 2-D command, and checking the 2D grid drawn in the step A;
c1, clicking 3D-elemeffset and solid map to generate tetrahedral and hexahedral solid grids, as shown in FIG. 12;
d1: connecting the model suture positions by using RIGID according to an intraoperative collection suture method; the method comprises the following steps: clicking 1D-edges, independent-node, dependent-nodes and elem-types to select KINCOUP, selecting nodes according to an intraoperative stitching mode, and finally creating;
e1: selecting the entity grids with good edges through a TOOL-faces command, clicking to execute a find faces command, offsetting the skin thickness from the grid on the surface of the rib to simulate the human skin, and clicking 3D-elemeoffset to generate entity grids with different skin thicknesses, wherein as shown in FIG. 6, the entity grids with the skin thicknesses of 0.5mm, 1mm and 2mm can be generated specifically;
s5, importing the three-dimensional finite element ear model containing cartilage and different skin thicknesses obtained in the step S4 into a finite element professional analysis software Abaqus for finite element analysis; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
a2, creating two sections as skin and costal cartilage respectively, and type: soild, Homogeneous; material selects skin and costal cartilage respectively; when skin and cartilage attributes are respectively given, firstly creating Display groups to store a skin grid, then selecting Remove select to Remove the previously created skin grid, and after cartilage is left, giving different material attributes to the cartilage and the skin;
in this example, the material property settings are shown in table two below.
Watch two
Medpor Skin(s)
Density (g/cm)3) 0.565 1.0
Modulus of elasticity (Mpa) 72.0 0.87
Poisson ratio 0.4 0.4
Ultimate tensile strength 4.4 5.18
B2, selecting a Module Module-assembly to enter create-instance, and clicking part-ok;
c2, selecting Module-STEP, and then selecting statics and single factor analysis;
d2, selecting Module-interaction, selecting Create interaction property, creating Contact, setting native viewer as frictionless, and normal viewer as Hard Contact and property;
e2, selecting Module-Load;
e21, creating boundary conditions: setting boundary conditions according to the simulation of the human auricular cartilage and skin fixing position, and enabling U1=U2=U3=UR1=UR2=UR3
E22, giving gravity-9800 mm/s-2
E23, giving Pressure negative Pressure suction force of 0.02 Mpa;
f2, selecting a Module-Mesh, and determining C3D8R: An 8-node linear crack, reduced integration, ourglass control;
g2, selecting a Module Module-Job to enter an analysis stage to obtain the stress-strain analysis results of cartilage, skin, cartilage deformation and skin deformation, wherein the results are shown in figures 13 and 14; as can be seen from the figure, the stress concentration sites are all skin and cartilage suture sites. According to the strain result graph, the positions where the model deformation occurs are all at the positions of the auricle fracture. The phenomenon is analyzed, the upper edge of the auricle external helix has weak supporting force due to the structure, the displacement between the skin and the cartilage at the position is the largest, and the reverse displacement causes local fatigue strain to cause skin ulceration.
Judging the bursting risk of the ear support according to the finite element stress result; the ear support is optimized and adjusted according to the burst risk analysis result, the parts which are easy to burst are adjusted correspondingly, and the burst risk can be avoided.
According to the method for judging the ulceration risk of the reconstructed ear support, disclosed by the invention, the risk of the ulceration of the ear support is judged through the simulation analysis of the exposed stress-strain of the ear support on the morphological structure, so that a reference direction is provided for the optimization of the ear support. The method of the invention, in addition to enabling aesthetic improvements, facilitates its morphological structural analysis from the biomechanical direction. The method establishes different skin thicknesses and negative pressure attractions, can be used for pre-judging the ulceration risk of the ear support by different ear supports carved by different doctors, different skin thicknesses and different negative pressure attractions, and performs optimization adjustment to obtain the finished ear support with low ulceration probability.
Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention and not for limiting the protection scope of the present invention, and although the present invention is described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that modifications or equivalent substitutions can be made on the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention.

Claims (6)

1. A method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear scaffold is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, scanning the primary ear support body to obtain the contour data of the primary ear support body;
s2, importing the entity model of the primary ear support body in the STL format obtained in the step S1 into a geogenic free from and touch X software for surface restoration, and storing the entity model after surface restoration in the STL format;
s3, importing the STL format stored by the entity model after the curved surface is repaired in the step S2 into the Geomagic Wrap software, and selecting the commands as follows in sequence: the method comprises the following steps of (1) accurately curving a surface, automatically curving, constructing a contour line, constructing a surface sheet, constructing a grating, fitting a surface, finally generating a Nurbs curved surface, and exporting and storing the generated Nurbs curved surface in an IGES format;
s4, importing the Nurbs curved surface in the IGES format obtained in the step S3 into HyperMesh14.0 software for establishing a finite element model, and specifically comprising the following steps:
s4.1, opening Hypermesh software, and importing the Nurbs curved surface in the IGES format in the step S3 into the HyperMesh14.0 software;
s4.2, carrying out entity grid division;
s5, importing the three-dimensional finite element ear model containing cartilage and different skin thicknesses obtained in the step S4 into a finite element professional analysis software Abaqus for finite element analysis;
step S5 specifically includes:
a2, creating a skin part and a cartilage part, wherein the skin part and the cartilage part are of the types: entity, homogeneous; the materials of the skin part and the cartilage part are respectively selected from skin and costal cartilage;
when the skin and the cartilage are endowed with the attributes respectively, a skin group is created to store the skin grid, then a skin group removing command is selected to remove the previously created skin grid, and after the cartilage is left, different material attributes are endowed to the cartilage and the skin;
b2, selecting an assembly module command, and assembling and determining the skin model and the cartilage model;
c2, selecting step module commands, and then selecting static and single-factor analysis commands;
d2, setting the model tangential behavior to frictionless;
e2, reload boundary conditions;
e21, creating boundary conditions: setting boundary conditions to be simulated according to the fixed positions of the auricular cartilage and the skin of the human body, and enabling six degrees of freedom of the space at the fixed positions to be zero;
e22, giving gravity-9800 mm/s-2
E23, giving Pressure negative Pressure suction force of 0.02 Mpa;
f2, determining the grid to be divided into entity grids;
g2, for analysis;
and S6, obtaining stress-strain analysis results of cartilage, skin, cartilage deformation and skin deformation, and judging the rupture risk of the primary body of the ear support according to the finite element stress result.
2. The method for determining the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support according to claim 1,
step S1 is specifically to place the carved primary ear support body on a sterile table, attach a sterilized positioning target point on the sterile table around the primary ear support body, and scan with a hand-held handscan700 three-dimensional scanner at a measurement rate of 480,000 times/second and a precision of 0.03mm to obtain profile data of the primary ear support body.
3. The method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support according to claim 2, wherein: step S4.2, entity grid division is carried out, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
a1: carrying out entity mesh division on a Nurbs curved surface which is created after a contour line is constructed in the Geomagic Wrap software; the method comprises the following steps: importing a Nurbs curved surface in an IGES format into Hypermesh software, entering a Geom-2D panel, selecting an automatic gridding subcommand, selecting a surface to be generated, setting the size and the type of a grid, clicking a segmentation command, segmenting, and adjusting a 2D grid with an angle or length-width ratio which does not meet the requirement so that the 2D grid meets the requirements of the angle and the length-width ratio;
b1: clicking the view grid quality tool, selecting the 2-D command, and checking the 2D grid of step A1;
c1, generating tetrahedral and hexahedral solid grids;
d1: connecting the model suture positions according to an intraoperative collection suture method;
e1: and selecting the stitched entity grids before framing through a face command, clicking to execute a face searching command, offsetting skin thickness by using the cartilage surface grids to simulate human skin, and clicking a 3D grid generation tool to generate entity grids with different skin thicknesses.
4. The method for determining the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support according to claim 3, wherein a solid mesh with a skin thickness of 0.5mm, 1mm or 2mm is generated in step E1.
5. The method for judging the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support according to claim 1, wherein: the primary ear support body is an ear support body carved with costal cartilage of a target object, or a Medpor model or a Nagata model.
6. The method for determining the ulceration risk of a reconstructed ear support according to claim 3,
step D1 specifically is: clicking to fix, then clicking to select an independent computing mode and an element type, selecting a node according to an intraoperative stitching mode, and finally clicking to create an instruction to create a model.
CN201810491587.9A 2018-05-22 2018-05-22 Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support Active CN108734783B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810491587.9A CN108734783B (en) 2018-05-22 2018-05-22 Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810491587.9A CN108734783B (en) 2018-05-22 2018-05-22 Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108734783A CN108734783A (en) 2018-11-02
CN108734783B true CN108734783B (en) 2021-06-15

Family

ID=63938846

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810491587.9A Active CN108734783B (en) 2018-05-22 2018-05-22 Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108734783B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109801280A (en) * 2019-01-22 2019-05-24 南方医科大学 A kind of human body auricle morphology symmetrical analysis method based on 3D image
CN112131773A (en) * 2020-10-09 2020-12-25 南方医科大学 Dynamic finite element simulation method based on inner surface negative pressure suction

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103919631A (en) * 2014-04-28 2014-07-16 四川大学 Manufacturing method for jaw defect individual restoration
CN105405167A (en) * 2015-11-05 2016-03-16 中国人民解放军第三军医大学第二附属医院 Finite element modeling method based on complete human head
CN105877875A (en) * 2016-05-27 2016-08-24 华南理工大学 Personalized thyroid cartilage prosthesis and production method thereof
CN106821569A (en) * 2017-04-01 2017-06-13 南方医科大学 Neonate's auricle KAFO and its manufacture method
CN107137167A (en) * 2017-05-05 2017-09-08 南方医科大学 Modeling method, manufacture method and the Auricular framework of the exposed Auricular framework of prevention
CN107451321A (en) * 2017-05-16 2017-12-08 中国人民解放军海军总医院 A kind of pilot's cardiorespiratory system emulation modelling method for being used to block warship process
CN107811729A (en) * 2017-10-20 2018-03-20 赵德伟 A kind of method for preparing acetabular bone supplementary material

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2901043B1 (en) * 2006-05-12 2008-07-18 Rech S De L Ecole Nationale Su METHOD FOR MAKING A MODEL WITH FINISHED ELEMENTS OF A SINGLE BODY OF COMPLEX SHAPE AND STRUCTURE

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103919631A (en) * 2014-04-28 2014-07-16 四川大学 Manufacturing method for jaw defect individual restoration
CN105405167A (en) * 2015-11-05 2016-03-16 中国人民解放军第三军医大学第二附属医院 Finite element modeling method based on complete human head
CN105877875A (en) * 2016-05-27 2016-08-24 华南理工大学 Personalized thyroid cartilage prosthesis and production method thereof
CN106821569A (en) * 2017-04-01 2017-06-13 南方医科大学 Neonate's auricle KAFO and its manufacture method
CN107137167A (en) * 2017-05-05 2017-09-08 南方医科大学 Modeling method, manufacture method and the Auricular framework of the exposed Auricular framework of prevention
CN107451321A (en) * 2017-05-16 2017-12-08 中国人民解放军海军总医院 A kind of pilot's cardiorespiratory system emulation modelling method for being used to block warship process
CN107811729A (en) * 2017-10-20 2018-03-20 赵德伟 A kind of method for preparing acetabular bone supplementary material

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"3D打印技术辅助耳修复手术的研究进展";钟静等;《中国医学物理学杂志》;20161225;全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108734783A (en) 2018-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2001242995B2 (en) Method of producing profiled sheets as prosthesis
US9056017B2 (en) 3D design and fabrication system for implants
CN108763709B (en) Reconstruction ear support topological structure optimization method based on finite element analysis
US8706285B2 (en) Process to design and fabricate a custom-fit implant
Mohammed et al. Augmented patient-specific facial prosthesis production using medical imaging modelling and 3D printing technologies for improved patient outcomes
CN109938869B (en) Gum repairing method and system
CN108734783B (en) Method for judging ulceration risk of reconstructed ear support
KR101624608B1 (en) Method for designing automatically customized nasal implant
Olsen et al. 3D-printing and upper-limb prosthetic sockets: promises and pitfalls
CN113326588B (en) Porous bone implant structure design method for simulating biological bone rigidity
CN204260854U (en) The personalized base station manufacturing system of a kind of digitized
CN112395699A (en) Preparation method of medical fixing brace based on topology optimization
Facchini et al. Autologous ear reconstruction: towards a semiautomatic CAD-based procedure for 3D printable surgical guides
CN111128367A (en) Modeling and simulating method and system for eyes
CN108245298A (en) A kind of night using type human spine lateral bending orthopedic brace and its design method
CN209847468U (en) Ear support implant
CN113768668B (en) Modeling method for designing personalized medical mandible model based on TPMS
CN105213049A (en) A kind of method for designing of individualized healing base platform and system
KR102273146B1 (en) Method for manufacturing surgical implant
Buzi et al. Icex: Advances in the automatic extraction and volume calculation of cranial cavities
CN108904099A (en) A kind of personalized implant design method simulated based on bone and skin deformation
CN109273092B (en) Method for preparing tympanic membrane model and tympanic membrane carving reference model
CN113413246B (en) 3D printing mandible model and method based on three-dimensional reconstruction topological optimization
CN116384176A (en) Method for establishing human auricular cartilage model by considering mechanical properties and method for generating bracket
Mussi et al. A simple interactive tool for the CAD modelling of surgical guides for autologous ear reconstruction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant