CN108255983B - Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method - Google Patents

Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108255983B
CN108255983B CN201711460007.1A CN201711460007A CN108255983B CN 108255983 B CN108255983 B CN 108255983B CN 201711460007 A CN201711460007 A CN 201711460007A CN 108255983 B CN108255983 B CN 108255983B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
army
weapon
command
combat
basic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201711460007.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108255983A (en
Inventor
张艳伟
沈鸿喆
黄志良
沈海平
王汉斌
马勇
董晓璋
张一博
谭玲
李长军
孙裔申
卜卿
黄山良
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CETC 28 Research Institute
Original Assignee
CETC 28 Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CETC 28 Research Institute filed Critical CETC 28 Research Institute
Priority to CN201711460007.1A priority Critical patent/CN108255983B/en
Publication of CN108255983A publication Critical patent/CN108255983A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108255983B publication Critical patent/CN108255983B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/30—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting lawful interception, monitoring or retaining of communications or communication related information
    • H04L63/302—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting lawful interception, monitoring or retaining of communications or communication related information gathering intelligence information for situation awareness or reconnaissance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/22—Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24—Querying
    • G06F16/245—Query processing
    • G06F16/2458—Special types of queries, e.g. statistical queries, fuzzy queries or distributed queries
    • G06F16/2462—Approximate or statistical queries
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/26—Government or public services

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Fuzzy Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for analyzing the combat capability of an army and estimating battle damage based on weapon data, which comprises the steps of constructing a weapon equipment basic information base and a basic command combat unit database; constructing a command combat unit compiling database; constructing a weapon equipment configuration database of a command operation unit; dynamically screening the troops according to the army species and the training level; carrying out enemy and my force comparison analysis and fighting capacity analysis according to the army type and the weapon equipment information; and carrying out calculation and estimation on battle damage according to the combat capability of the troops. The method can dynamically divide the army types and the levels of the enemy army in strategic combat simulated training, classify and count the detailed information of the army, preliminarily estimate the combat ability and combat damage of the army, provide decision-making directions for trainees, assist the trainees in analyzing the enemy situation and make decisions and plan plans, and add important decision-making means for project training.

Description

Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method
Technical Field
The invention relates to a military strategy simulation training combat planning method, in particular to a method for analyzing the combat capability of an army and estimating combat damage based on weapon data.
Background
The son military science cloud' the husband does not war and the temple calculates the winner, and more money is calculated; the temple who is not in war can be computed as win, but as little as win, as much as win, as little as lose, and as yet as nothing. Before the battle, the final victory can be obtained by carrying out detailed analysis, comparison and planning and fully utilizing the advantages of the user.
In one battle, the subsequent decision making and plan planning can be carried out to reasonably deploy the plan carefully only by understanding the armed analysis of mastering the weaponry and the army ability of the enemy and our army. The fighting capacity is embodied on the factors of army personnel, weapon equipment quantity, quality, training grade and the like, so in order to better understand and master the fighting capacity condition of the enemy army, statistical analysis is carried out on the personnel, the weapons and the like of the army, the planning personnel can make and distribute data for subsequent tasks, and the comparison of the fighting capacity is one of unavailable pre-fighting analysis means.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: aiming at the defects of the prior art, the army fighting capacity analysis and combat damage estimation method based on weapon data is provided, which can be used for carrying out contrastive analysis on combat troops of two enemies and the two parties in planning simulation training, mastering the fighting strength of the enemies and the two parties, and providing reliable basis for subsequent combat planning and action making.
The technical scheme is as follows: the invention relates to a method for analyzing the combat capability of an army and estimating battle damage based on weapon data, which comprises the following steps:
(1) constructing a basic information base of weapon equipment and a basic unit database of command combat;
(2) constructing a command combat unit compiling database;
(3) constructing a weapon equipment configuration database of a command operation unit;
(4) dynamically screening the troops according to the army species and the training level;
(5) carrying out comparison analysis on the enemy and my force data according to the army type and the weapon equipment information;
(6) carrying out quantitative analysis and calculation on the fighting capacity of the enemy and my army according to the information of the enemy and my weaponry and the number of the personnel;
(7) and estimating the battle damage according to the fighting capacity of the enemy and our troops.
Further, the step (1) comprises:
(11) construction of weapon equipment basic information base
Firstly, according to the form and main functions of the weapon equipment, the weapon equipment is divided into sixteen types, namely an aircraft, an armored car, a tank, a gun, a ground-to-ground missile, an air-to-air missile, an anti-ship missile, an air defense weapon, a radar, a ship, an electronic warship, communication equipment, engineering equipment, NBC equipment and reconnaissance equipment, and the basic information base of the respective weapon equipment is respectively constructed.
Secondly, under each type of weapon equipment library, a plurality of weapon equipment tables are subdivided according to the specific form, type and action of the weapon for maintenance.
And then, extracting key parameters and performance indexes according to actual conditions of the weaponry, and setting a detailed table structure of each type of weaponry table.
(12) Construction of basic command and operation unit database
In order to associate the army with the weapon, a basic command and operation unit database is constructed according to army and army types, and corresponding weapon equipment is equipped when the basic command and operation unit is established.
Firstly, establishing respective basic command combat unit libraries according to four categories of army land, sea, air and air defense.
Secondly, each type of basic command and operation unit library is refined into basic command units, basic operation units and basic auxiliary units according to the unit types of the troops, and data tables are respectively established.
Secondly, inputting basic command operation unit elements and corresponding weapon equipment numbers into a basic command operation unit database table, and associating the basic command operation unit database table with a weapon equipment table; and each basic command operation unit database table carries 10 types of weapons at most, and the weapons are classified, screened and carried according to training conditions, and the number of each type of weapons can be customized.
Further, the step (2) is that a command operation unit compiling database is created according to the established basic command operation unit data and the compiling requirements of the command operation units in the training plan; the command operation unit compilation database is used for deriving an army with compilation and command levels by using a basic command operation unit, at least 2-3 artillery journeys of the same type and equipment are compiled in the army compilation, at this time, 3 artillery journeys are derived by using the artillery journey chessman unit and are hung on respective superior teacher units, and the training parameters of the army units are perfected according to the training requirements.
According to the army command level, the data of the army basic operation unit data table structure of the army command station can be derived into a group army command station unit, a teacher command station unit, a travel command station unit, a group command station unit and the like, according to the functions of the army operation unit, the data of the army operation unit can be derived into main operation units such as machine walking, motor walking, army walking, troop and military troop, according to the responsibility of the army auxiliary unit, the data of the army auxiliary unit can be derived into units such as an industrial army, an NBC army, a communication army, an electronic warfare army, a rear-loading guarantee army and the like, and the derived army units are hung and leaned through the numbers of the upper-level command stations according to the compiling relationship to form a complete army compiling tree. The construction principle of army, army and air defense is the same as that of army.
Further, after the complete army is compiled in the step (3), classifying units of the army, and configuring corresponding weaponry based on a weapon type library; the weapon equipment configuration database of the command operation unit stores the army information of main command posts (direct army, team and team army, team and team of direct army under the war zone), wherein the information refers to the data set of all armies of subordinate directly belonging to the command post and the command post;
according to the army organization condition, dividing army unit attributes SERVICE into a plurality of types, such as land, sea, air defense, artillery and the like; counting and carding basic information of each army unit, such as the number of basic combat units, the number of soldiers, the number of main combat equipment and the like; all weaponry under the jurisdiction of the combat unit record the field type and function type of the weaponry. Domain classes such as light arms, tanks, armored cars, artillery, ground missiles, air-to-air missiles, anti-ship missiles, air defense weapons, radars, ships, electronic warfare equipment, communications equipment, transportation equipment, engineering equipment, NBC equipment, and reconnaissance equipment; the functional types such as cannon category can be subdivided into sub-categories such as cannon, howitzer, rocket cannon, mortar, recoilless cannon and the like.
Further, in the step (4), the military force comparison analysis modes are specifically divided into 5 types according to the military force category and the task type, namely, marine military force comparison analysis, land military force comparison analysis, air force prevention military force comparison analysis and artillery missile army force comparison analysis.
When the comparison is carried out, the army level screening system can be divided into two levels according to requirements, namely, the army level screening system carries out level screening on army in the group military level and the teacher-travel level, and the army level screening system only carries out force comparison on related army selected by both the enemy and the my.
Further, in the step (5), the weapon types and the number of the troops participating in comparison are upwards aggregated according to a leaf-to-root method, the number of various subordinates is counted, and weapon statistics needs to be carried out according to actual requirements when the types of weapons concerned by land, sea, air and artillery are different; after a certain army is double-hit, the detailed information of the army is counted, the information comparison of the two armies can be carried out through the detailed information viewing interface, and the difference of the two army scales and weapon allocation is visually displayed.
Further, the step (6) comprises:
(61) calculating the fighting force value of the weapon according to the weapon type and the key performance parameters, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Cw＝Cwb×Re×Rt(1)；
wherein, CwIs the fighting force value of the weapon, CwbIs the basic fighting force value, R, of the weaponeAs power correction factor, R, of the weapontIs the combined correction factor for the weapon.
Power correction factor R of the weaponeThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000041
wherein, PwcAnd MwcThe engine power and the full combat weight, P, of the weaponwbAnd MwbThe power of the weapon engine and the full weight of the battle which are used as calculation standards in the weapon are respectively.
The comprehensive correction coefficient R of the weapontThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000042
wherein R isiIs the ith performance parameter of the weapon.
(62) Calculating the force value of the army according to the calculated force value of the single weapon and the calculated force value of the fighter
The force value calculation formula of the army battle is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000043
wherein，CbpIndicating the basic fighting power of the fighter, NpIndicating the number of fighters, RtlRepresenting the correction coefficient of the army's training level, CwiRepresenting the ith weapon battle force, NwiIndicating the ith weapon quantity, RmRepresenting the army morale integrity correction factor.
Further, the step (7) comprises:
(71) according to the influence factors of the fighting types and the battlefield environment of the two parties on the army of the two parties, the ratio of the fighting force values is calculated, and the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000044
Figure BDA0001530067840000045
wherein R iscdefFor the ratio of the final ability of the defensive party to the attacking party, RcoffTo the ratio of the ultimate ability of the attacking and defending parties, CdefIs the fighting power of a defensive party under an ideal state, CoffIs the fighting power of the attack party in the ideal state, RenvThe correction value of the battlefield environment to both parties; determining whether the battlefield environment is corrected in the forward direction or the reverse direction for each party according to the types of the two parties; for example, when the front is the red party, the battle type is defense, and the battlefield environment is favorable, then the defense processes are: cdef*(1+Renv) The attack and attack processes are Coff*(1-Renv) (ii) a When the front is the red party, the fighting type is defense, and the battlefield environment is unfavorable, then the treatment of the defense party is: cdef*(1-Renv) The attack and attack processes are Coff*(1+Renv)。
(72) Searching corresponding engagement decision table according to the ratio of fighting power of both parties and the fighting conditions, finally obtaining an engagement damage estimation result by correcting the result of the ratio of power, searching corresponding correction value of the decision result according to the type of the fighting army and the battlefield conditions by using the set of decision table, and correcting the ratio of power to obtain the estimation result of the fighting damageThe result is; converting the combat conditions into random values (3,5,7) in the range of 1-10, based on the ratio of the combat forces RcdefOr RcoffAnd the operational condition RcondLook-up table to obtain fighting loss result correction value RpdefAnd Rpoff。
The calculation formula of the battle damage of the two parties is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000051
Figure BDA0001530067840000052
wherein, PdefTo defend against damage value, PoffFor attack value, CoffTo the extent of the offensive ability, CdefFor defensive ability values, RcondCorrection of capacity for combat conditions, RpdefIs the result probability correction value.
Has the advantages that: the invention can carry out statistical analysis according to the army information preset according to the scenario situation selected by the trainee in the strategic combat simulation training, carry out army information statistics and army operational capability calculation, and estimate the battle damage results of both armies after determining the combat type of the army. Therefore, a decision direction is provided for trainees, the trainees are assisted to analyze the conditions of the enemies and the peoples and make decisions and plan plans, and an important decision means is added for planning and training.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a detailed information viewing style diagram of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. The method comprises the steps of firstly, constructing troops and classifying and warehousing weapon equipment to form a closed troop and weapon association system. And then according to the analysis requirements in the training, carrying out specific statistical analysis on basic information and weapon equipment information of specific troops and carrying out red-blue comparison to form an intuitive force comparison table to support the subsequent planning requirements.
As shown in fig. 1, a method for analyzing the combat capability and estimating engagement damage of an army based on weapon data comprises the following steps:
(1) constructing basic information base and basic command and operation unit database of weaponry
The types of the weaponry are rich, the weaponry needs to be classified according to the main functions of the weaponry, and various weaponry basic information bases are established for management.
According to the form and the main functions of the weaponry, the weaponry is divided into sixteen types, namely aircrafts, armored cars, tanks, artillery, ground-to-ground missiles, air-to-air missiles, anti-ship missiles, air defense weapons, radars, ships, electronic warfare weapons, communication equipment, engineering equipment, NBC equipment, reconnaissance equipment and the like, and basic information bases of the weaponry are respectively constructed. According to the specific form, type and function of the weapon, various weapon equipment basic information bases are subdivided into a plurality of weapon equipment basic information base tables for maintenance, for example, an aircraft base mainly comprises data tables such as a fighter plane table, a bomber plane table, an unmanned plane table, an electronic fighter plane table, an early warning plane table and a helicopter plane table.
Because various weaponry have great differences in parameter types and performance expression modes, the system extracts key parameters and performance indexes according to actual conditions of the weaponry, establishes a basic information base table of the weaponry, and manages the basic information base table of the weaponry by taking the most concerned performance parameters such as cannon type, caliber, range, warhead type, explosion and damage range, launching rate, maneuvering speed, maneuvering distance, full-load oil quantity, unit oil consumption, ammunition load, state conversion time and the like as basic information.
In the detailed weapon equipment basic information base table, detailed base table structural members and data maintenance are carried out according to the type and the characteristics of the weapon and key parameters required by system use. Taking artillery weapons as an example, table 1 shows the basic structure of an artillery table.
Watch 1 artillery table structure
Figure BDA0001530067840000061
Figure BDA0001530067840000071
Other weapon base tables are similar to the artillery base table, and the entries of the equipment attributes in the data table are modified according to the actual condition of weapon equipment.
In order to associate troops with weaponry, a basic command unit database (basic command units comprise troops, teachers, teams, and the like, and basic operation units comprise camps, teams, and the like) needs to be constructed according to troops and weapons. According to the configuration and organization relationship, the basic command combat unit database is divided into four categories of land, sea, air and air defense. According to the unit types of the army, each type of basic command and operation unit database can be refined into a basic command unit, a basic operation unit and a basic auxiliary unit, and basic command and operation unit database tables are respectively and independently established. The basic command operation unit can be provided with weapons, corresponding weapons serial numbers can be added in the basic only operation unit database table, and the association between the basic command operation unit and the weapons basic information base table is completed. Each basic command operation unit can carry 10 types of weapons at most, the weapons, namely data recorded in a weapon equipment basic information base table can be classified, screened and mounted according to training conditions, and the number of each type of weapons can be customized. Basic command operational unit elements are basically consistent, taking a army basic operational unit data table as an example, and a table 2 is a army basic operational unit data table structure.
TABLE 2 elementary data table structure for army basic command and combat unit
Figure BDA0001530067840000072
Figure BDA0001530067840000081
(2) Establishing database for compiling command operation units
And creating a command and operation unit compilation database according to the compilation requirements of the command and operation units in the trained plan. The command and operation unit compiling database is used for deriving an army with compiling and command levels by using a basic command and operation unit. For example, when a gun and barracks basic operation unit is established, and a plurality of guns recorded in a weapon and barracks basic information table are provided for the gun and barracks basic operation unit. In army organization, the cannon barracks of the same type and equipment can be 2-3, and at the moment, 3 cannon barracks units are derived by using the basic cannon barracks unit and belong to the jurisdiction of the superior travel command post unit. According to the training requirement, the training parameters of the command operation unit, such as training grade, morals and equipment and material personnel conditions, are perfected, and a detailed and real force compiling tree is formed.
According to the army command level, the data of the basic command operation unit data table of the army command station can be derived into a group army command station unit, a teacher command station unit, a travel command station unit, a group command station unit and the like. According to the functions of the army operation units, the data of the army operation units can derive main operation units such as machine step camp, massage step camp, armor camp, step camp and the like. According to the responsibility of the army auxiliary unit, the data of the army auxiliary unit can derive units such as an army unit, an NBC unit, a communication unit, an electronic warfare unit, a back-loading guarantee unit and the like. And the derived army units are affiliated through the superior command post numbers according to the compiling relationship to form a complete army compiling tree. The construction principle of army, army and air defense is the same as that of army.
Basic attributes such as unit numbers, army levels, superior unit numbers, unit training levels, morale, full editing rate, equipment matching rate, material completeness rate and the like are mainly stored in the constructed command and operation unit editing database.
The chess pieces are sequentially generated into corresponding chess piece numbers according to the derived father chess piece numbers, and the generation codes of the team numbers are generated according to the forms of the state, the army, the weapon and the serial number. Table 3 compiles a database table structure for the command combat unit.
Table 3 commanding combat unit compiling database table structure
Figure BDA0001530067840000091
(3) Method for constructing weapon equipment configuration database of command operation unit
On the basis of obtaining the complete army organization, classifying each command and operation unit of the army, and configuring corresponding weapon equipment based on a weapon type library. The weapon equipment configuration database of the command operation unit stores the army information of the main command post (group army, teacher, tour, group), and the information includes the data of the command post and the set of all the army data of the subordinate.
Dividing army units into properties such as land, sea, air defense, artillery and the like according to military categories and task types; counting and carding basic information of each command operation unit, such as the number of soldiers, the number of main operations and links, and the like; all weaponry under the jurisdiction of the operational unit record the field types and function types of the weaponry, the field types comprise tanks, armors, artillery, ground missile, air-air missile, anti-ship missile, air defense weapon, light arms, radars, naval equipment, electronic warfare equipment, communication equipment, transportation, engineering equipment, NBC equipment, reconnaissance equipment and the like, wherein the artillery is taken as an example, and the function types of the artillery are divided into cannons, grenades, rockets, mortars and the like according to different functions and trajectories. Table 4 is a weapon type library table structure.
TABLE 4 weapon type TABLE STRUCTURE
Field identification Type (B) Remarks for note
UNITCODE NUMBER(11) Army number
EQUCATEGORY NUMBER(2) Large class number of weaponry
EQUTYPE NUMBER(2) Small class number of weapon equipment
EQUNUMBER NUMBER(10) Number of equipment
SERVICE NUMBER(2) Military and basic information category
EQUCODE NUMBER(10) Equipment numbering
SCENARIOID NUMBER(10) Design number
(4) Dynamic screening of troops according to military species and training levels
According to the army categories and the task types, the army force comparison analysis modes are specifically divided into 5 categories, namely, sea army force comparison analysis, land army force comparison analysis, air defense army force comparison analysis and artillery missile army force comparison analysis. When carrying out enemy military force comparison, the enemy army is generally used for carrying out military force comparison on the army of the enemy, the navy of the enemy and the navy of the army, the air force of the enemy and the air force of the army and the army of the artillery of the army. As the military strength comparison objects of the air defense forces are the air defense force of the party and the air force of the enemy, the method is not suitable for the military strength comparison analysis of the air defense forces.
According to actual use experience, the large-scale military force comparison analysis usually considers the comparison of the strength of the enemy and the my parties in a group military level or a teacher-tour level. Therefore, in the process of the military force comparison and analysis, the system can complete the comparison between the group military and the master battle army at the teacher-tour level mainly based on the previous compiling information and weapon allocation information of the operation units. The data and information involved in the comparison will comprise the aggregate of the data and information for that unit of engagement and all the units of engagement that are subordinate to that unit of engagement. Taking army force comparison analysis as an example, when a group military grade is selected, the enemy army only displays all group military directors directly under a war zone; when selecting a teacher level, the enemy army displays the direct teachers and troops under the war area and the direct teachers and troops under all the group army. The system only carries out the force comparison to relevant army that enemy my both sides selected.
(5) Carrying out enemy and my force comparison analysis according to the army type and the weapon equipment information
According to the upward aggregation method, the quantity of the weapon equipment of the command operation unit participating in comparison is accumulated and counted according to the type, and the number of soldiers and the number of main operation and operation are counted. Different types of weapons paid attention by land, sea, air and artillery need weapon statistics according to actual requirements. Taking the army as an example, the army force comparison interface displays the classification and basic style of the items according to the use experience as shown in table 5.
TABLE 5 Classification and basic style of military force contrast interface display items
Figure BDA0001530067840000111
Shown in table 5 is an overview of the army information, and the force comparison of the army master station army focuses on the number of machine barracks, motor barracks, armband barracks, and flight barracks, as well as the number of armband, gun, missile, anti-armor weapons, and air defense weapons of each army. By comparing the numbers of the enemy and the weapon, the general proportion of the fighting capacity of the enemy army is firstly intuitively known. However, because the number cannot directly represent the strength of the fighting power, the number of the red square cannons is more than that of the blue square cannons, but the efficiency of the blue square cannons is far more than that of the red square cannons, and therefore, the specific situation of the weapons allocated by the troops needs to be checked on the basis of the number. After a certain army is double-hit on the army force comparison main interface, the detailed information of the army, including the number of personnel, training level, material matching rate, equipment completion rate, personnel attendance rate, types and number of the equipped specific weapons, is counted; the detailed information is checked, the information of the two troops can be compared, and the difference of the two troops in troop scale and weapon allocation is visually displayed. The detailed information viewing interface style is as in fig. 2.
The interface displays the detailed data of the two troops for comparison, including the basic information of the two troops, such as oil carried by the troops, ammunition, troop gas, after-loading and supply; and the weapon type, weapon model and weapon quantity to which the army is assigned.
Meanwhile, after the contrastive analysis is completed, the system provides a data export function, and exports contrastive analysis data in an Excel mode, so that decision-making personnel can be helped to complete analysis report preparation.
(6) Quantitatively analyzing and calculating the fighting capacity of the enemy and our army according to the number of enemy and our weaponry and personnel
The basic elements of the combat power of troops are fighters and weaponry. The quality of weapon performance directly influences the fighting force of troops, and the quantity and training level of fighters play a role in correcting the fighting force of troops. On the basis that the number of the fighters and the information of weapons and equipment of the fighters are counted by the enemy and the my, a fighting capacity value is calculated according to the weapon type and the key performance parameters, and the quantitative calculation of the fighting capacity of the troops is carried out according to a fighting capacity evaluation index system.
When the quantitative analysis and calculation are carried out on the battle effectiveness of the team, firstly, the battle effectiveness of each type of weapon is quantitatively calculated. The magnitude of the weapon battle force depends on the number of the weapons, the maneuverability, the shooting distance, the hit precision, the killing capability and the like, and the influence parameters of different weapons are different according to different targets.
Taking quantitative analysis of the fighting capacity of the armor as an example, the fighting capacity value of the weapon is calculated according to the formula (1).
Cw＝Cwb×Re×Rt(1)；
Wherein, CwIs the fighting force value of the weapon, CwbIs the basic fighting force value, R, of the weaponeAs power correction factor, R, of the weapontIs the combined correction factor for the weapon. In calculating the fighting power of a weapon, it is necessary to find a weapon among the same weapons as a standard for quantifying the specific fighting power. Calculating the power correction coefficient R of the weapon according to the formula (2)e：
Figure BDA0001530067840000121
Wherein, PwcAnd MwcThe engine power and the full combat weight, P, of the weaponwbAnd MwbThe power of the weapon engine and the full weight of the battle which are used as calculation standards in the weapon are respectively. For example, armor selection T90 as a calculation criterion, then ReThe power correction coefficient obtained is that of a certain type of armor with the T90 combat performance as a standard. When the standard is selected, all armored weapons use the same standard to calculate the fighting capacity.
The comprehensive correction coefficient considers the performance of weapons in various aspects, taking the armor as an example, the comprehensive correction coefficient is as shown in a formula (3):
Rt＝Rh+Rv+Rg+Rfc+Rele+Rcc+Rdef(3)；
wherein R ish，Rv，Rg，Rfc，Rele，Rcc，RdefThe coefficient of hit of the armor, night vision coefficient, navigation coefficient, digital fire control coefficient, comprehensive electronic coefficient, finger control coefficient and active defense coefficient. Again, these coefficients are all at a selected T90Performance parameters of the armor were performance quantified for the standard. E.g. hit coefficient R thereinhThe calculation formula is as the formula (4):
Figure BDA0001530067840000131
wherein HT90Hit rate for type T90 armor, HxFor a certain type of armor hit rate to be calculated, RhIs the hit coefficient. The calculation of the other coefficients refers to the formula (4) to calculate instead of the corresponding performance parameters.
The combined correction factor for each category of weapon is slightly more emphasized. The armored weapons can be calculated according to the formula (3), and the artillery weapons are mainly focused on types, calibers and the like, and the missiles are mainly focused on hit rate and the like.
And after the fighting force value of a single weapon is calculated according to the performance of the weapon, calculating the fighting force value of the army on the basis of the weapon. The force value of the army battle depends on the fighter and the weaponry. The calculation formula is as the formula (5):
Figure BDA0001530067840000132
wherein, CbpIndicating the value of the personnel's basic combat force, NpDenotes the number of persons, RtlRepresenting the correction coefficient of the army's training level, CwiRepresenting the value of the ith weapon fighting force, NwiIndicating the ith weapon quantity, RmRepresenting the army morale integrity correction factor.
According to the action mode exerted in the battle, the army personnel are roughly divided into fighters, combat commanders and commanders, and mainly pay attention to two indexes of military skills and leadership command. The weights of two types of indexes of military skills and leadership are obtained by three quantitative methods of an assigning method, a sequencing method and an analytic hierarchy process, and are averaged on the basis to obtain the weights q of the two types of indexesm,qcCalculating the personnel foundation fighting force value C by a weighted average algorithmbp. The calculation formula is as the formula (6):
Cbp＝qm*pm+qc*pc(6)；
in the formula, pmAnd pcThe measured values of the two indexes of military skill and leader command are respectively.
RtlThe army training grade correction coefficient is obtained according to the army training grade (special training, sufficient training, general training and insufficient training) according to an analytic hierarchy process, and the more sufficient the training is, the higher the correction coefficient is.
RmThe army morale power correction coefficient is obtained according to army morale state grades (rising, general, falling and collapsing) according to an analytic hierarchy process, and the higher the morale power is, the higher the correction coefficient is.
(7) Estimation of battle damage according to the fighting power of the enemy and our army
After calculating the fighting capacity of the two sides of army, according to the influence factors of the fighting types and the battlefield environment of the two sides of army, the ratio of the fighting capacity is calculated, and the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000141
Figure BDA0001530067840000142
wherein R iscdefFor the ratio of the final ability of the defensive party to the attacking party, RcoffTo the ratio of the ultimate ability of the attacking and defending parties, CdefIs the fighting power of a defensive party under an ideal state, CoffIs the fighting power of the attack party in the ideal state, RenvThe correction value for both parties is the battlefield environment. And determining whether the battlefield environment is corrected in the forward direction or the reverse direction for each party according to the types of the battles of the two parties. For example, when the front is the red party, the battle type is defense, and the battlefield environment is favorable, then the defense processes are: cdef*(1+Renv) The attack and attack processes are Coff*(1-Renv) (ii) a When the front is the red party, the fighting type is defense, and the battlefield environment is unfavorable, then the defense partyThe treatment comprises the following steps: cdef*(1-Renv) The attack and attack processes are Coff*(1+Renv)。
Because the factors such as weather, terrain, visual conditions, subjective factors of personnel, situation change and the like can directly influence the fighting result in real fighting and have certain randomness, the influence factors in the real fighting are simplified during calculation, the factors are integrated into the fighting conditions, and the fighting condition selection box is configured to provide three options of benefit, generality and disadvantage. The option participates in obtaining the corrected value of the fighting capacity damage result.
According to the ratio R of the fighting power of both partiescdefAnd RcoffAnd the fighting condition RcondAnd searching a corresponding battle decision table, and finally obtaining a battle damage estimation result by correcting the capacity ratio result. The engagement decision table refers to rules in the weapons and chesses, and the table is established mainly by a set of data system which is designed according to the tactical performance, war experience, exercise experiment and the like of various troops and various weaponry through statistical analysis. Table 6 gives a rough example of the army defense engagement sanction table.
TABLE 5 army defense engagement adjudication Table approximate example
Figure BDA0001530067840000143
Figure BDA0001530067840000151
And inquiring the corresponding judgment result correction value according to the type of the combat troops and the battlefield conditions by using the war game judgment table, and correcting the force ratio to obtain a combat damage estimation result. For example, the two parties are army wars, the red party is a defense party, and the warfare conditions favor the red party. Fighting condition Rcond(benefit, general, disadvantage) to a random value (3,5,7) in the range of 1-10, according to the fighting power ratio RcdefOr RcoffAnd the operational condition RcondLook-up table to obtain fighting loss result correction value RpdefAnd Rpoff。
The calculation formula of the battle damage of the two parties is as follows:
Figure BDA0001530067840000152
Figure BDA0001530067840000153
wherein, PdefTo defend against damage value, PoffFor attack value, CdefIs the fighting power of a defensive party under an ideal state, CoffIs the fighting power of the attack party in the ideal state, RenvFor correction of both parties for battlefield conditions, RpdefAnd RpoffAnd correcting the damage result.
In conclusion, the method can dynamically divide the army types and the levels of the enemy army according to the preset army information in strategic combat simulated training, and carries out statistics according to the army organization of the enemy and the army selected by the trainee, classifies and counts the detailed information of the army, preliminarily estimates the combat ability and combat damage of the army, thereby providing decision-making direction for the trainee, assisting the trainee to analyze the enemy situation and make decision-making and plan-making, and adding an important decision-making means for project training.

Claims (7)

1. A method for analyzing the combat capability of an army and estimating battle damage based on weapon data is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) constructing a basic information base of weapon equipment and a basic unit database of command combat;
(2) constructing a command combat unit compiling database;
(3) constructing a weapon equipment configuration database of a command operation unit;
(4) dynamically screening the troops according to the army species and the training level;
(5) carrying out comparison analysis on the enemy and my force data according to the army type and the weapon equipment information;
(6) carrying out quantitative analysis and calculation on the fighting capacity of the enemy and my army according to the information of the enemy and my weaponry and the number of the personnel; the method comprises the following steps:
(61) calculating the fighting force value of the weapon according to the weapon type and the key performance parameters, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Cw＝Cwb×Re×Rt(1)；
wherein, CwIs the fighting force value of the weapon, CwbIs the basic fighting force value, R, of the weaponeAs power correction factor, R, of the weapontA comprehensive correction factor for the weapon;
power correction factor R of the weaponeThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
Figure FDA0002352858490000011
wherein, PwcAnd MwcThe engine power and the full combat weight, P, of the weaponwbAnd MwbThe power and the full weight of the battle are respectively used as the calculation standard in the weapon;
the comprehensive correction coefficient R of the weapontThe calculation formula of (2) is as follows:
Figure FDA0002352858490000012
wherein R isiAn ith performance parameter for the weapon;
(62) calculating the force value of the army according to the calculated force value of the single weapon and the calculated force value of the fighter
The force value calculation formula of the army battle is as follows:
Figure FDA0002352858490000013
wherein, CbpIndicating the basic fighting power of the fighter, NpIndicating the number of fighters, RtlRepresenting the correction coefficient of the army's training level, CwiRepresenting the ith weapon battle force, NwiIndicates the ith WuNumber of devices, RmRepresenting the morale power correction coefficient of the troops;
(7) and estimating the battle damage according to the fighting capacity of the enemy and our troops.
2. The method for analyzing combat capability and estimating battle damage of troops based on weapon data as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step (1) comprises:
(11) construction of weapon equipment basic information base
Firstly, dividing weapon equipment into sixteen types, namely an aircraft, an armored car, a tank, a gun, a ground-to-ground missile, an air-to-air missile, an anti-ship missile, an air defense weapon, a radar, a ship, an electronic warfare weapon, communication equipment, engineering equipment, NBC equipment and reconnaissance equipment according to the form and the main functions of the weapon equipment, and respectively constructing basic information bases of the respective weapon equipment;
secondly, under each type of weapon equipment library, subdividing a plurality of weapon equipment tables for maintenance according to the specific form, type and action of the weapon;
secondly, extracting key parameters and performance indexes according to actual conditions of the weaponry and setting a detailed table structure of each weapon and equipment table;
(12) construction of basic command and operation unit database
In order to associate the army with the weapon, a basic command and operation unit database is constructed according to army and army types, and corresponding weapon equipment is equipped when a basic command and operation unit is established;
firstly, establishing respective basic command combat unit libraries according to four major categories of army, such as army, sea, air and air defense;
secondly, each type of basic command and operation unit library is refined into a basic command unit, a basic operation unit and a basic auxiliary unit according to the unit type of the army, and data tables are respectively established;
secondly, inputting basic command operation unit elements and corresponding weapon equipment numbers into a basic command operation unit database table, and associating the basic command operation unit database table with a weapon equipment table; and each basic command operation unit database table carries 10 types of weapons at most, and the weapons are classified, screened and carried according to training conditions, and the number of each type of weapons can be customized.
3. The method for analyzing the combat capability and estimating the battle damage of the army based on the weapon data as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step (2) is to create a database for compiling command operational units according to the compilation requirements of the command operational units in the training plan based on the established basic command operational unit data; the command operation unit compilation database is used for deriving an army with compilation and command levels by using a basic command operation unit, at least 2-3 artillery journeys of the same type and equipment are compiled in the army compilation, at this time, 3 artillery journeys are derived by using the artillery journey chessman unit and are hung on respective superior teacher units, and training parameters of the army units are perfected according to training requirements;
according to the army command level, the data of the army basic operation unit data table structure of the army command place are derived into a group army command place unit, a teacher command place unit, a travel command place unit and a group command place unit, according to the functions of the army operation unit, the data of the army operation unit is derived into a plurality of main operation units, according to the responsibility of the army auxiliary unit, the data of the army auxiliary unit is derived into an engineer army, an NBC army, a communication army, an electronic war unit and a rear installation support army unit, and the derived army units are attached through the serial numbers of upper-level command places according to the compilation relationship to form a complete army compilation tree; the construction principle of army, army and air defense is the same as that of army.
4. The method for analyzing combat ability and estimating battle damage of troops based on weapon data as claimed in claim 1, wherein in said step (3), after the complete troops are compiled, the troops are classified into units, and corresponding weaponry is configured based on weapon type library; the weapon equipment configuration database of the command operation unit stores the army information of the main command post, wherein the information refers to the data set of all the armies of the subordinate directly belonging to the command post and the command post;
dividing unit attributes SERVICE of the troops into a plurality of types according to the scheduling conditions of the troops; and (4) carrying out statistics and carding on basic information of each army unit, recording all weaponry administered by a combat unit, and recording the field type and the function type of the weaponry.
5. The method for analyzing the combat ability of an army and estimating the damage from battles and wars based on weapon data as claimed in claim 1, wherein in said step (4), the weapons force comparison analysis is specifically classified into 5 categories, i.e. navy force comparison analysis, army force comparison analysis, air force comparison analysis and artillery missile army force comparison analysis, according to the categories of military forces and the types of tasks;
when the comparison is carried out, the army level screening system can be divided into two levels according to requirements, namely, the army level screening system carries out level screening on army in the group military level and the teacher-travel level, and the army level screening system only carries out force comparison on related army selected by both the enemy and the my.
6. The method for analyzing combat ability and estimating battle damage of troops based on weapon data as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step (5), the weapon types and numbers of troops participating in comparison are gathered upwards according to a leaf-to-root method, and the numbers of troops under the command are counted, and the weapon statistics is carried out according to actual requirements when the types of weapons concerned by land, sea, air and artillery are different; after a certain army is double-hit, the detailed information of the army is counted, the information comparison of the two armies can be carried out through the detailed information viewing interface, and the difference of the two army scales and weapon allocation is visually displayed.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises: the step (7) comprises:
(71) according to the influence factors of the fighting types and the battlefield environment of the two parties on the army of the two parties, the ratio of the fighting force values is calculated, and the formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002352858490000041
Figure FDA0002352858490000042
wherein R iscdefFor the ratio of the final ability of the defensive party to the attacking party, RcoffTo the ratio of the ultimate ability of the attacking and defending parties, CdefIs the fighting power of a defensive party under an ideal state, CoffIs the fighting power of the attack party in the ideal state, RenvThe correction value of the battlefield environment to both parties; determining whether the battlefield environment is corrected in the forward direction or the reverse direction for each party according to the types of the two parties;
(72) searching a corresponding engagement decision table according to the ratio of the fighting forces of the two parties and the fighting conditions, finally obtaining an engagement damage estimation result by correcting the result of the ratio of the energy, searching a corresponding correction value of the decision result by using the set of decision table according to the type of the fighting army and the battlefield conditions, and correcting the ratio of the energy to obtain the estimation result of the fighting damage; converting the combat conditions into random values (3,5,7) in the range of 1-10, based on the ratio of the combat forces RcdefOr RcoffAnd the operational condition RcondLook-up table to obtain fighting loss result correction value RpdefAnd Rpoff；
The calculation formula of the battle damage of the two parties is as follows:
Figure FDA0002352858490000043
Figure FDA0002352858490000044
wherein, PdefTo defend against damage value, PoffFor attack value, CoffTo the extent of the offensive ability, CdefFor defensive ability values, RcondCorrection of capacity for combat conditions, RpdefAnd correcting the damage result.
CN201711460007.1A 2017-12-28 2017-12-28 Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method Active CN108255983B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711460007.1A CN108255983B (en) 2017-12-28 2017-12-28 Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711460007.1A CN108255983B (en) 2017-12-28 2017-12-28 Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108255983A CN108255983A (en) 2018-07-06
CN108255983B true CN108255983B (en) 2020-06-02

Family

ID=62724053

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201711460007.1A Active CN108255983B (en) 2017-12-28 2017-12-28 Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108255983B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4064613A1 (en) * 2021-03-25 2022-09-28 Cervus Defence And Security Limited Systems and method for use in automated analysis of operational exercises

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109063270B (en) * 2018-07-10 2022-11-11 北京华如科技股份有限公司 Ground polymerization entity direct aiming shooting damage judging method and storage medium
CN109241591B (en) * 2018-08-21 2022-05-17 哈尔滨工业大学 Anti-ship missile combat effectiveness evaluation and decision-making assistance method
CN109460565B (en) * 2018-09-17 2020-10-27 北京晶品镜像科技有限公司 Autonomous shooting decision modeling method for cannon barracks
CN109210997B (en) * 2018-11-09 2021-02-09 王文芳 Real soldier and intelligent target fight method based on intelligent live ammunition target system
CN109902933B (en) * 2019-01-29 2023-06-09 西安近代化学研究所 Evaluation method for damage level of battle part of counter-warship for battling surface warship
CN111027862B (en) * 2019-12-11 2022-12-27 中国舰船研究设计中心 Multidimensional-based hierarchical aggregation combat simulation training evaluation method
CN111861090B (en) * 2020-04-13 2022-11-04 中国人民解放军陆军勤务学院 Material consumption summarizing calculation method based on segmentation
CN112090068A (en) * 2020-07-10 2020-12-18 厦门雷霆互动网络有限公司 Attack and defense interaction method for ship game, electronic equipment and computer readable medium
CN111894946B (en) * 2020-07-20 2022-07-15 中国人民解放军空军工程大学 Equipment hydraulic system fault prediction method based on combat intensity and environment
CN115879327B (en) * 2023-02-24 2023-05-30 山东捷瑞数字科技股份有限公司 Digital twinning-based damage efficiency evaluation method, device, equipment and medium

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103177191A (en) * 2013-04-11 2013-06-26 北京理工大学 Warhead damage performance evaluation method
CN103870882A (en) * 2013-12-18 2014-06-18 中国人民解放军装甲兵工程学院 System and method for analyzing war power indicator system based on models
KR20140145446A (en) * 2013-06-13 2014-12-23 국방과학연구소 A virtual combat simulation system for combat effectiveness analysis of weapon system and method thereof

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103177191A (en) * 2013-04-11 2013-06-26 北京理工大学 Warhead damage performance evaluation method
KR20140145446A (en) * 2013-06-13 2014-12-23 국방과학연구소 A virtual combat simulation system for combat effectiveness analysis of weapon system and method thereof
CN103870882A (en) * 2013-12-18 2014-06-18 中国人民解放军装甲兵工程学院 System and method for analyzing war power indicator system based on models

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Military simulation big data:background, state of the art, and challenges;Xiao Song;《Hindawi》;20151211;全文 *
基于火力毁伤的作战能力评估方法;马骏;《基于火力毁伤的作战能力评估方法》;20130831;第4卷(第4期);正文第42-46页 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4064613A1 (en) * 2021-03-25 2022-09-28 Cervus Defence And Security Limited Systems and method for use in automated analysis of operational exercises

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108255983A (en) 2018-07-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108255983B (en) Weapon data-based army combat capability analysis and combat damage estimation method
CN109408877B (en) Intelligent shooting decision-making method for anti-tank missile teams
CN109210997B (en) Real soldier and intelligent target fight method based on intelligent live ammunition target system
Stockfisch Models, data, and war: A critique of the study of conventional forces
CN109460565A (en) A kind of autonomous shooting Decision Modeling method of artilleryman battalion
CN109447398B (en) Intelligent shooting decision method for artillery group
Bateman et al. Maximizing Engagement Area Lethality
Zabecki 4 German Artillery in the First World War
McCarthy Combat Values
Cui et al. Smoke Support System Simulation Effectiveness Evaluation
CN117829532A (en) Cooperative firepower distribution method for armored equipment beyond-visual-distance striking network
Ney Organization and Equipment of the Infantry Rifle Squad: From Valley Forge to ROAD.
Jarnot Air mech XXI: new revolution in maneuver warfare
Chadwick Part-Time Soldiers: Reserve Readiness Challenges in Modern Military History
Simon Engage, destroy, survive: characteristics of US Army pistol, carbine, and rifle direct fire engagements in modern combat
Zhou et al. Double fuzzy decision based artillery battlefield target value sequencing
Schroeder Robotics in Infantry Battalions
Wellons Direct Fire to Indirect Fire: Changing Artillery for the Future?
Wood The United States Army's Preparedness to Conduct Urban Combat: A Strategic Priority
Ges et al. Should the Future Direct Support Weapon for Light Forces Be a 105-Millimeter Howitzer?
Why Evolution of Fire Support Doctrine was Driven by Airmobile Doctrine and New Weapon Systems During the Vietnam War
Bryant Weapons of the US Army Rangers
Backlund Asault rifles: Comparison, analysis and future trends
FORCES et al. MILITARY INTERVENTION AND COMMON SENSE
Lane et al. Representation of Small-arms Effects in Aggregated Force-on-force Combat Models

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant