CN107588685B - A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing - Google Patents
A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107588685B CN107588685B CN201710886658.0A CN201710886658A CN107588685B CN 107588685 B CN107588685 B CN 107588685B CN 201710886658 A CN201710886658 A CN 201710886658A CN 107588685 B CN107588685 B CN 107588685B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- interceptor
- floated
- formation
- spacing
- probability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing the invention discloses a kind of, it is characterised in that in conjunction with the characteristic of the floated interceptor of different model, the floated interceptor established under typical situation is structured the formation optimal interval distance model；Floated interceptor overlay area area is calculated separately by optimal interval distance model and injures projected area, and it is determined with projected area ratio is injured by interceptor overlay area area to attack torpedo theory and cross battle array probability, the maximum that torpedo crosses gust probability is attacked by seeking, so that it is determined that the best spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.This method can ensure floated interceptor to attacking torpedo most greater than effectively determining that floated interceptor most preferably structures the formation spacing under battle array Probability Condition, the calculating of guidance and support to floated interceptor drop point, it improves to attack the mistake battle array probability of torpedo, it intercepts to improve floated interceptor to our naval vessels come the interception probability of success of attacking torpedo, are improved to attack survival probability when torpedo.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to underwater defence technical fields, and in particular to a kind of underwater torpedo defense field of military operations effect of surface ship
It can technical field.
Background technique
Defensive weapons of the floated interceptor as passive intercept torpedo, shadow of the interception effect by factors
It rings.From front end torpedo target acquisition to target data, processing is again to the resolving of fire control data, arm discharge control, ammunition drop point meter
In the factors such as calculation and bullet battle array resuspension procedure metamorphosis, ammunition impact point calculation is directly affected as important link therein
Floated interceptor is to come the interception effect of attacking torpedo.
The impact point calculation of floated interceptor depends mainly on following factor: the impact accuracy of ammunition, first ammunition are fallen
Spacing of structuring the formation between point position and ammunition.Wherein, first ammunition drop point site calculate mainly according to come attack torpedo target away from
From, orientation, course, initial position (emitter installation site, this warship posture) information of ammunition flat pad, ammunition flight bullet
Road and enter the factors such as in stable condition after water；The drop point site of other ammunitions also needs to consider that its own is opposite with previous piece of ammunition
Position, i.e. spacing distance form an effective barrage.The selection of the distance between adjacent two pieces of interceptors directly determines in barrage
The validity of barrage and attacking the mistake battle array probability of torpedo.During current equipment preparation, solution of fire control link empirically
Unified spacing distance is chosen, suitability and flexibility are poor, and lack reasonable theoretical foundation.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is provide it is a kind of determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing,
This method can ensure floated interceptor to attacking torpedo most greater than effectively determining floated interceptor under battle array Probability Condition
Best spacing of structuring the formation, the calculating of guidance and support to floated interceptor drop point improve to attack the mistake battle array probability of torpedo, to mention
It uphangs floating interceptor and intercepts to our naval vessels come the interception probability of success of attacking torpedo, are improved to attack survival probability when torpedo.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention adopts the following technical scheme:
A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing, it is characterised in that block in conjunction with different model is floated
The characteristic of bullet is cut, the floated interceptor established under typical situation is structured the formation optimal interval distance model；Pass through optimal interval distance
Model calculates separately floated interceptor overlay area area and injures projected area, and by interceptor overlay area area and
Projected area ratio is injured to determine and attack torpedo theory and cross battle array probability, attacks the maximum that torpedo crosses gust probability by seeking,
So that it is determined that the best spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.
In above-mentioned technical proposal, the floated interceptor established under typical situation is structured the formation optimal interval distance model are as follows: every
The damage effect range of piece interceptor is a three-dimensional sphere body, can be reduced to the round zone of action in projection plane, two pieces
Relative positional relationship between interceptor is reduced to the geometrical relationship between two border circular areas, and the round center of circle is the suspension of interceptor ammunition
Present position, circular radius are the radius of damage of interceptor, and center of circle spacing is not more than 2 times of radiuses:
Wherein: r: the floated interceptor radius of damage；2d: two pieces of ammunitions are structured the formation spacing；H: for interceptor lay depth with
Horizontal minimum vertical distance between effectively intercepting boundary；θ: the horizontal minimum boundary point that effectively intercepts of interceptor is to circle center line connecting and two pieces
The angle of interceptor circle center line connecting；Vertical range and interceptor injure half between t: two pieces of interceptor effect crosspoints and bullet heart line
The ratio of diameter；W: interceptor lays interval coefficient.
In above-mentioned technical proposal, interceptor overlay area area is calculated
Projected area is injured in calculating
In above-mentioned technical proposal, calculates and cross a gust probability to attack torpedo
In above-mentioned technical proposal, battle array probability was soughtMaximum value calculated battle array maximum probability value condition lower suspension and blocked
It cuts bullet to structure the formation spacing distance, thus can determine that floated interceptor spacing distance of structuring the formation as most preferably is structured the formation spacing distance.
In above-mentioned technical proposal, a gust probability has been served asWhen maximum value, determineThereby determine that spacing distance of most preferably structuring the formation
With the relationship of the floated interceptor radius of damage.
It is main compared with the existing technology to carry out big data (Meng Teka by establishing interceptor and torpedo model more true to nature
Sieve) emulation, statistical disposition is carried out for the simulation result under exemplary simulation situation to obtain interception probability.The invention proposes
A method of it determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing, initiative proposition floated interceptor overlay area area and ruins
The concept for hurting projected area attacks torpedo theory mistake with projected area calculating is injured by floated interceptor overlay area area
Battle array probability, sought the maximum of battle array probability, and thereby determined that the best spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.It is blocked suitable for floated
Cut the analysis and calculating of the operational exertion research and underwater torpedo defense fighting efficiency of bullet.Floated interceptor is supported to injure half
The demand relation of the relevant parameters such as diameter, width of structuring the formation calculates, floated interceptor operational exertion and effectiveness analysis research, support divide
The interception probability of success of floated interceptor is analysed, provides support for the design of surface ship anti-torpedo armament system and capability evaluation.
It can effectively determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation to attack under conditions of torpedo crosses gust probability guaranteeing floated interceptor.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is modular concept figure (adjacent floated interceptor home position relational graph) of the invention；
The floated interception that Fig. 2 is realized according to the present invention bounces gust probability extreme value emulation and solves curve.
Specific embodiment
The present invention is further illustrated with use-case is implemented with reference to the accompanying drawing.
Since the maximum value and minimum value difference of crossing battle array probability are smaller, when actual engineering design, needs to combine ammunition quantity etc.
The restriction of other factors selects a kind of spacing distance for more meeting current techniques state.
Determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing the invention proposes a kind of.This method can guarantee to hang
Floating interceptor effectively determines that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing to crossing under conditions of gust probability attacking torpedo.
Under the conditions of typical situation, attacking immediately ahead of torpedo navigation, floated interceptor is structured the formation molding, adjacent two pieces suspend
Relative position signal such as Fig. 1 between formula interceptor.The damage effect range of every piece of interceptor is a three-dimensional sphere body in Fig. 1,
The round zone of action can be reduced in projection plane, the relative positional relationship between two pieces of interceptors is reduced between two border circular areas
Geometrical relationship, the round center of circle is interceptor ammunition suspension present position, and circular radius is the radius of damage of interceptor, between the center of circle
Away from no more than 2 times of radiuses (if more than 2 times, then it is constant injuring projected area).
(1) parameter definition
R: the floated interceptor radius of damage；2d: two pieces of ammunitions are structured the formation spacing；H: depth and level are laid most for interceptor
Vertical distance between small effective interception boundary；θ: the horizontal minimum boundary point that effectively intercepts of interceptor is to circle center line connecting and two pieces of interceptors
The angle of circle center line connecting；T: two pieces of interceptor effect crosspoints and the ratio for playing vertical range and the interceptor radius of damage between heart line
Value；A gust probability is crossed to attack torpedo；W: interceptor lays interval coefficient, Smnn'm'm: interceptor overlay area area, i.e. fish
Thunder is worn on gust direction, and interceptor bullet battle array horizontal axis extends rectangular area area combined by one times of radius of damage with lower thereon；
Sbpca'c'p'b'ab: projected area, the i.e. practical upright projection injured region and wear gust direction in torpedo of interceptor bullet battle array are injured
Region area.Illustrated according to Fig. 1, correlation is as follows between major parameter:
Interceptor lays interval coefficient:
(2) interceptor overlay area area is calculated
(3) it calculates and injures projected area
(4) it calculates and crosses a gust probability to attack torpedo
(5) battle array probability was soughtMaximum value, if t is that two pieces of interceptors act on crosspoint and play vertical range between heart line
With the ratio of the interceptor radius of damage；It is then calculated by formula (3) and crosses a gust probability to attack torpedo are as follows:
The maximum for seeking battle array probability calculated battle array maximum probability value condition lower suspension interceptor and structured the formation interval distance
From thus can determine that floated interceptor spacing distance of structuring the formation as most preferably is structured the formation spacing distance.
For the method, below by taking small-bore floated interceptor theory structures the formation distance computation as an example, description is specific
Embodiment:
(1) parameter setting
The radius of damage of small-bore floated interceptor is fixed tentatively as 14m, therefore r=14.
(2) battle array probability was sought using formula (4)Extreme value
Emulation (Matlab emulation sampling number 10000), which is sought intercepting, in t ∈ (0,1) range bounces the very big of gust probability
Value, it is as shown in Figure 2 that floated interception bounces gust Probability maximum value emulation solution curve.Wherein, horizontal axis is t ∈ (0,1)；The longitudinal axis is
Cross battle array probabilityMaximum.
1. being most 0.8428 greater than battle array probability as t=0.843.
2. it is 0.7854 that minimum, which crosses battle array probability, as t=0 or 1.
(3) spacing distance of most preferably structuring the formation is determined
It is most 0.8428 greater than battle array probability, corresponding at this time most preferably structure the formation is spaced 2d and is as t=0.843
1.0758r about 15m.
The above is only that type theory of the invention implements example, not makees any form and application bar to the present invention
Limitation on part, those skilled in the art make a little simple modification such as ammunition quantity, equivalent variations using above-mentioned technology contents
Or modification, it falls within the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. a kind of determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing, it is characterised in that in conjunction with the floated interception of different model
The characteristic of bullet, the floated interceptor established under typical situation are structured the formation optimal interval distance model；By optimal interval apart from mould
Type calculates separately floated interceptor overlay area area and injures projected area, and by interceptor overlay area area and ruins
Hurt projected area ratio to determine and attack torpedo theory and cross battle array probability, attacks the maximum that torpedo crosses gust probability by seeking, from
And determine the best spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation；
The optimal interval distance model are as follows: the damage effect range of every piece of interceptor is a three-dimensional sphere body, flat in projection
The round zone of action can be reduced in face, the relative positional relationship between two pieces of interceptors is reduced to the geometry between two border circular areas
Relationship, the round center of circle are interceptor ammunition suspension present position, and circular radius is the radius of damage of interceptor, and center of circle spacing is little
In 2 times of radiuses:
Wherein: r: the floated interceptor radius of damage；2d: two pieces of ammunitions are structured the formation spacing；H: depth and level are laid for interceptor
Minimum vertical distance between effectively intercepting boundary；θ: horizontal minimum boundary point to the circle center line connecting and two pieces that effectively intercept of interceptor intercepts
Play the angle of circle center line connecting；T: two pieces of interceptors effect crosspoints and play vertical range and the interceptor radius of damage between heart line
Ratio；W: interceptor lays interval coefficient.
The method of spacing 2. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 1 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that calculating is blocked
It cuts and plays overlay area area
Projected area is injured in calculating
。
The method of spacing 3. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 2 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that calculate and
It attacks torpedo and crosses a gust probabilityFor
。
The method of spacing 4. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 1 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that sought
Battle array probabilityMaximum value calculated battle array maximum probability value condition lower suspension interceptor and structured the formation spacing distance, thus can determine outstanding
Floating interceptor spacing distance of structuring the formation as most preferably is structured the formation spacing distance.
The method of spacing 5. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 4 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that served as battle array
ProbabilityWhen maximum value, determineThereby determine that the relationship of most preferably structure the formation spacing distance and the floated interceptor radius of damage.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710886658.0A CN107588685B (en) | 2017-09-21 | 2017-09-21 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710886658.0A CN107588685B (en) | 2017-09-21 | 2017-09-21 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107588685A CN107588685A (en) | 2018-01-16 |
| CN107588685B true CN107588685B (en) | 2019-07-12 |
Family
ID=61048132
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710886658.0A Active CN107588685B (en) | 2017-09-21 | 2017-09-21 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107588685B (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108520312B (en) * | 2018-03-14 | 2021-09-10 | 北京电子工程总体研究所 | Offshore combat air defense deployment optimization design method |
| CN108917481B (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2019-06-25 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is structured the formation effective width |
| CN114036783B (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-03-22 | 中国人民解放军96901部队 | Line target function damage judgment method based on truncation mechanism and damage calculation model |
| CN114877751B (en) * | 2022-06-17 | 2024-06-14 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining suspension depth of suspension type interception bomb |
| CN115292653B (en) * | 2022-06-30 | 2023-06-13 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining evaluation boundary of action range of suspension type interception bomb array |
| CN116625180A (en) * | 2023-05-10 | 2023-08-22 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for measuring distance between adjacent falling points of suspension type deep-spring array |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4961393A (en) * | 1982-08-30 | 1990-10-09 | Murray Myles N | Anti-projectile protection fence and method for marine surface vessels |
| US6714845B2 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2004-03-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and apparatus for intercepting an evading target alerted at seeker turn-on |
| CN101226043A (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-23 | 孙珠峰 | Decussation stereo torpedo catching net |
| KR101211518B1 (en) * | 2011-11-15 | 2012-12-12 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | Apparatus for intercepting underwater weapon and method thereof |
-
2017
- 2017-09-21 CN CN201710886658.0A patent/CN107588685B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4961393A (en) * | 1982-08-30 | 1990-10-09 | Murray Myles N | Anti-projectile protection fence and method for marine surface vessels |
| US6714845B2 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2004-03-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and apparatus for intercepting an evading target alerted at seeker turn-on |
| CN101226043A (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-23 | 孙珠峰 | Decussation stereo torpedo catching net |
| KR101211518B1 (en) * | 2011-11-15 | 2012-12-12 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | Apparatus for intercepting underwater weapon and method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 悬浮式深弹拦截不确定型鱼雷作战模型研究;姚奉亮等;《鱼雷技术》;20110228;第19卷(第1期);第63-67页 |
| 拦截鱼雷作战的深弹布设优化决策模型;赵峰等;《系统工程与电子技术》;20140531;第36卷(第5期);第905-911页 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN107588685A (en) | 2018-01-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107588685B (en) | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing | |
| CN107300691B (en) | A kind of passive co-interfere method of distribution for Antiship Missile Terminal Guidance Radar | |
| CN107390190B (en) | A kind of Multi-Target Passive co-interfere method formed into columns based on distribution | |
| CN109597423A (en) | A kind of design method of the multiple constraint Terminal Guidance Laws based on reference sight angle signal | |
| CN115238226B (en) | Calculation method for air defense effective killing area | |
| CN108520312A (en) | A kind of naval warfare air defense disposition optimum design method | |
| CN108917481B (en) | A method of determining that floated interceptor is structured the formation effective width | |
| CN109063331A (en) | A kind of small miss distance fragmentation warhead is to the appraisal procedure for reentering bullet damage effect | |
| Wood et al. | The maritime role in the North Atlantic | |
| Wenbin | Soviet Military Deployments in the Asia-Pacific Region: Implications for China’s Security | |
| CN202599241U (en) | Harbour single point defensive installation | |
| CN115061495B (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle group countermeasure autonomous control method based on eagle pigeon game | |
| CN113703479A (en) | Weapon configuration method and system based on high-density value and large depth | |
| CN106123692B (en) | A kind of stealthy method of 3-D spraying | |
| Zuoe et al. | Study on vertical attack penetration probability of anti-ship missile | |
| CN103712524A (en) | Combined type air-defense equipment | |
| CN108763652B (en) | Target attack attempt identification method for self-propelled air defense weapon system | |
| CN104236397B (en) | Manufacturing method of ground interception earth-penetrating missile defense device | |
| CN112182898B (en) | Kinetic energy interception primary-secondary type reentry warhead end encounter discrimination method | |
| ying Wang et al. | The mechanism analyzing and use of corner reflector against anti-ship missiles | |
| CN113627081B (en) | Unmanned intelligent cluster countermeasure control method based on eagle crowd hunting behavior bionical | |
| CN101676676A (en) | Device for launching air bombs for 'intercepting' torpedo attacks and method using same | |
| RU2005140895A (en) | METHOD OF SURVIVING A GROUP TARGET BATTLE WITH A CLOSED FIRE POSITION BY UNMANAGED APPLIANCES AND A SYSTEM FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION | |
| CN116909311B (en) | Distributed series sea fight attack angle decision method | |
| RU2768991C1 (en) | Method for destroying a surface target by a rocket launched from under water |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |