CN107588685A - It is a kind of to determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing - Google Patents
It is a kind of to determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107588685A CN107588685A CN201710886658.0A CN201710886658A CN107588685A CN 107588685 A CN107588685 A CN 107588685A CN 201710886658 A CN201710886658 A CN 201710886658A CN 107588685 A CN107588685 A CN 107588685A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- interceptor
- msup
- mrow
- floated
- formation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing the invention discloses a kind of, it is characterised in that with reference to the characteristic of the floated interceptor of different model, the floated interceptor established under typical situation is structured the formation optimal spacing distance model；Floated interceptor overlay area area is calculated respectively and injures projected area by optimal spacing distance model, and by interceptor overlay area area and projected area ratio is injured to determine that torpedo is theoretical to cross battle array probability to attack, the maximum that torpedo crosses gust probability is attacked by asking for, so that it is determined that the optimal spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.This method can ensure floated interceptor to attacking torpedo most greater than effectively determining that floated interceptor most preferably structures the formation spacing under battle array Probability Condition, instruct and support the calculating to floated interceptor drop point, improve to attack the mistake battle array probability of torpedo, so as to improve floated interceptor to attacking the interception probability of success of torpedo, improve our naval vessels and intercept survival probability during attacking torpedo.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to underwater defence technical field, and in particular to a kind of underwater torpedo defense field of military operations effect of surface ship
Can technical field.
Background technology
Defensive weapons of the floated interceptor as passive intercept torpedo, shadow of its interception result by factors
Ring.The resolving to fire control data again, arm discharge control, ammunition drop point meter are handled from front end torpedo target acquisition to target data
In the factors such as calculation and bullet battle array resuspension procedure metamorphosis, ammunition impact point calculation directly affects as important step therein
Floated interceptor is to attacking the interception result of torpedo.
The impact point calculation of floated interceptor depends mainly on following factor：The impact accuracy of ammunition, first ammunition fall
Spacing of structuring the formation between point position and ammunition.Wherein, first ammunition drop point site calculate Main Basiss come attack torpedo target away from
From, orientation, course, initial position (emitter installation site, this warship posture) information of ammunition flat pad, ammunition flight bullet
Road and enter the factor such as in stable condition after water；The drop point site of other ammunitions also needs to consider that its own is relative with previous piece of ammunition
Position, i.e. spacing distance, form an effective barrage.The selection of the distance between adjacent two pieces of interceptors directly determines in barrage
The validity of barrage and attacking the mistake battle array probability of torpedo.During current equipment preparation, in solution of fire control link empirically
Unified spacing distance is chosen, its suitability and flexibility are poor, and lack rational theoretical foundation.
The content of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is：A kind of method that floated interceptor of determination most preferably structures the formation spacing is provided,
This method can ensure floated interceptor to effectively determining floated interceptor under torpedo most serious offense battle array Probability Condition to attack
Optimal spacing of structuring the formation, the calculating to floated interceptor drop point is instructed and supported, is improved to attack the mistake battle array probability of torpedo, so as to carry
Floating interceptor is uphang to attacking the interception probability of success of torpedo, our naval vessels is improved and intercepts survival probability during attacking torpedo.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention adopts the following technical scheme that：
It is a kind of to determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing, it is characterised in that to block with reference to different model is floated
The characteristic of bullet is cut, the floated interceptor established under typical situation is structured the formation optimal spacing distance model；Pass through optimal spacing distance
Model calculates floated interceptor overlay area area and injures projected area respectively, and by interceptor overlay area area and
Projected area ratio is injured to determine to cross battle array probability to attack torpedo theory, the maximum that torpedo crosses gust probability is attacked by asking for,
So that it is determined that the optimal spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.
In above-mentioned technical proposal, the floated interceptor established under typical situation optimal spacing distance model of structuring the formation is：Often
The damage effect scope of piece interceptor is a three-dimensional sphere body, can be reduced to the circular zone of action in projection plane, two pieces
Relative position relation between interceptor is reduced to the geometrical relationship between two border circular areas, and the circular center of circle suspends for interceptor ammunition
Present position, circular radius are the radius of damage of interceptor, and center of circle spacing is not more than 2 times of radiuses：
Wherein：r：The floated interceptor radius of damage；2d：Two pieces of ammunitions are structured the formation spacing；h：For interceptor lay depth with
Horizontal minimum vertical distance between effectively intercepting border；θ：The horizontal minimum boundary point that effectively intercepts of interceptor is to circle center line connecting and two pieces
The angle of interceptor circle center line connecting；t：Vertical range and interceptor injure half between two pieces of interceptor effect joinings and bullet heart line
The ratio in footpath；w：Interceptor lays interval coefficient.
In above-mentioned technical proposal, interceptor overlay area area is calculated
Projected area is injured in calculating
In above-mentioned technical proposal, calculate and cross a gust probability to attack torpedo
In above-mentioned technical proposal, battle array probability was asked forMaximum, calculated the interception of battle array maximum probability value condition lower suspension
Bullet is structured the formation spacing distance, thus can determine that floated interceptor spacing distance of structuring the formation as most preferably is structured the formation spacing distance.
In above-mentioned technical proposal, a gust probability has been served asDuring maximum, it is determined thatThereby determine that optimal spacing distance of structuring the formation
With the relation of the floated interceptor radius of damage.
Mainly carry out big data (Meng Teka by establishing interceptor more true to nature and torpedo model relative to prior art
Sieve) emulation, statistical disposition is carried out for the simulation result under exemplary simulation situation so as to draw interception probability.The present invention proposes
It is a kind of to determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing, initiative proposition floated interceptor overlay area area and ruin
Hinder the concept of projected area, by floated interceptor overlay area area and injure projected area calculating to attack torpedo theory mistake
Battle array probability, asked for the maximum of battle array probability, and thereby determined that the optimal spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.Blocked suitable for floated
Cut the operational exertion research and the analysis and calculating of underwater torpedo defense fighting efficiency of bullet.Floated interceptor is supported to injure half
The demand relation of the relevant parameters such as footpath, width of structuring the formation calculates, floated interceptor operational exertion and effectiveness analysis research, support divide
The interception probability of success of floated interceptor is analysed, support is provided for surface ship anti-torpedo armament system design and capability evaluation.
It can effectively determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation to crossing under conditions of gust probability attacking torpedo ensureing floated interceptor.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the modular concept figure (adjacent floated interceptor home position graph of a relation) of the present invention；
The floated interception that Fig. 2 realizes according to the present invention bounces gust probability extreme value emulation and solves curve.
Embodiment
The present invention is further illustrated with use-case is implemented below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Because the maximum and minimum value difference of crossing battle array probability are smaller, need during actual engineering design to combine ammunition quantity etc.
The restriction of other factorses, select a kind of spacing distance for more meeting current techniques state.
The present invention, which proposes, a kind of determines that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing.This method can ensure to hang
Floating interceptor effectively determines that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing to crossing under conditions of gust probability attacking torpedo.
Under the conditions of typical situation, attacking immediately ahead of torpedo navigation, floated interceptor is structured the formation shaping, adjacent two pieces suspend
Relative position signal such as Fig. 1 between formula interceptor.The damage effect scope of every piece of interceptor is a three-dimensional sphere body in Fig. 1,
The circular zone of action can be reduced in projection plane, the relative position relation between two pieces of interceptors is reduced between two border circular areas
Geometrical relationship, the circular center of circle is interceptor ammunition suspension present position, and circular radius is the radius of damage of interceptor, between the center of circle
Away from no more than 2 times radiuses (if more than 2 times, it is constant to injure projected area).
(1) parameter definition
r：The floated interceptor radius of damage；2d：Two pieces of ammunitions are structured the formation spacing；h：Depth and level are laid for interceptor most
Small vertical distance between effectively intercepting border；θ：The horizontal minimum boundary point that effectively intercepts of interceptor is to circle center line connecting and two pieces of interceptors
The angle of circle center line connecting；t：The ratio of vertical range and the interceptor radius of damage between two pieces of interceptor effect joinings and bullet heart line
Value；A gust probability is crossed to attack torpedo；w：Interceptor lays interval coefficient, Smnn'm'm:Interceptor overlay area area, i.e. torpedo
Wear on gust direction, rectangular area area of the interceptor bullet battle array transverse axis combined by with one times of radius of damage of lower extension thereon；Sbpca'
c'p'b'ab:Injure projected area, the i.e. actual upright projection area surface injured region and gust direction is worn in torpedo of interceptor bullet battle array
Product.Illustrated according to Fig. 1, correlation is as follows between major parameter：
Interceptor lays interval coefficient：
(2) interceptor overlay area area is calculated
(3) calculate and injure projected area
(4) calculate and cross a gust probability to attack torpedo
(5) battle array probability was asked forMaximum, act on joining if t is two pieces of interceptors and play vertical range between heart line
With the ratio of the interceptor radius of damage；Then calculated by formula (3) and cross a gust probability attacking torpedo and be：
The maximum of battle array probability was asked for, battle array maximum probability value condition lower suspension interceptor was calculated and structures the formation spacer
From thus can determine that floated interceptor spacing distance of structuring the formation as most preferably is structured the formation spacing distance.
For described method, below so that small-bore floated interceptor theory structures the formation distance computation as an example, description is specific
Embodiment：
(1) parameter setting
The radius of damage of small-bore floated interceptor is fixed tentatively as 14m, therefore r=14.
(2) battle array probability was asked for using formula (4)Extreme value
Emulation (Matlab emulation samplings number 10000), which is asked for intercepting, in the range of t ∈ (0,1) bounces the very big of gust probability
Value, it is as shown in Figure 2 that floated interception bounces gust Probability maximum value emulation solution curve.Wherein, transverse axis is t ∈ (0,1)；The longitudinal axis is
Cross battle array probabilityMaximum.
1. it is 0.8428 most greater than battle array probability as t=0.843.
2. as t=0 or 1, it is 0.7854 that minimum, which crosses battle array probability,.
(3) optimal spacing distance of structuring the formation is determined
It is 0.8428 most greater than battle array probability as t=0.843, the now corresponding optimal interval 2d that structures the formation is
1.0758r about 15m.
It is described above, only it is that the type theory of the present invention implements example, not makees any form and application bar to the present invention
Limitation on part, those skilled in the art make a little simple modification such as ammunition quantity, equivalent variations using above-mentioned technology contents
Or modification, all fall within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
- A kind of method of spacing 1. floated interceptor of determination is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that with reference to the floated interception of different model The characteristic of bullet, the floated interceptor established under typical situation are structured the formation optimal spacing distance model；By optimal spacing apart from mould Type calculates floated interceptor overlay area area and injures projected area respectively, and by interceptor overlay area area and ruins Hinder projected area ratio to determine to cross battle array probability to attack torpedo theory, the maximum that torpedo crosses gust probability is attacked by asking for, from And determine the optimal spacing that floated interceptor is structured the formation.
- The method of spacing 2. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 1 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that establish allusion quotation Floated interceptor under kenel gesture optimal spacing distance model of structuring the formation is：The damage effect scope of every piece of interceptor is one three N-dimensional sphere n body, can be reduced to the circular zone of action in projection plane, and the relative position relation between two pieces of interceptors is reduced to two Geometrical relationship between individual border circular areas, the circular center of circle are interceptor ammunition suspension present position, and circular radius is ruined for interceptor Hinder radius, center of circle spacing is not more than 2 times of radiuses：<mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msqrt> <mrow> <msup> <mi>r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow><mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msqrt> <mrow> <msup> <mi>r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>d</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow><mrow> <mi>&theta;</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>arcsin</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mfrac> <mi>h</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mfrac> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow><mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mfrac> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msqrt> <mrow> <msup> <mi>r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mfrac> </mrow>Wherein：r：The floated interceptor radius of damage；2d：Two pieces of ammunitions are structured the formation spacing；h：Depth and level are laid for interceptor Minimum vertical distance between effectively intercepting border；θ：Horizontal minimum boundary point to the circle center line connecting and two pieces that effectively intercept of interceptor intercepts Play the angle of circle center line connecting；t：Two pieces of interceptors effect joinings and play vertical range and the interceptor radius of damage between heart line Ratio；w：Interceptor lays interval coefficient.
- The method of spacing 3. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 2 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that calculating is blocked Cut and play overlay area area<mrow> <msup> <mi>Smnn</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>m</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>r</mi> <mo>&times;</mo> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>r</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>d</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> <msup> <mi>r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mi>r</mi> <msqrt> <mrow> <msup> <mi>r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </msqrt> <mo>-</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow>Projected area is injured in calculating<mrow> <msup> <mi>Sbpca</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>c</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>b</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>&pi;r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>&times;</mo> <msup> <mi>Sad</mi> <mo>&prime;</mo> </msup> <mi>q</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>&pi;r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>&times;</mo> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mfrac> <mi>&theta;</mi> <mn>360</mn> </mfrac> <mo>&times;</mo> <msup> <mi>&pi;r</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <mi>d</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow>
- The method of spacing 4. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 3 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that calculate and Attack torpedo and cross a gust probabilityFor
- The method of spacing 5. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 1 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that asked for Battle array probabilityMaximum, calculated battle array maximum probability value condition lower suspension interceptor and structured the formation spacing distance, thus can determine that outstanding Floating interceptor spacing distance of structuring the formation as most preferably is structured the formation spacing distance.
- The method of spacing 6. the floated interceptor of determination according to claim 5 is most preferably structured the formation, it is characterised in that served as battle array ProbabilityDuring maximum, it is determined thatThereby determine that the relation of optimal structure the formation spacing distance and the floated interceptor radius of damage.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710886658.0A CN107588685B (en) | 2017-09-21 | 2017-09-21 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710886658.0A CN107588685B (en) | 2017-09-21 | 2017-09-21 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107588685A true CN107588685A (en) | 2018-01-16 |
| CN107588685B CN107588685B (en) | 2019-07-12 |
Family
ID=61048132
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710886658.0A Active CN107588685B (en) | 2017-09-21 | 2017-09-21 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation spacing |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107588685B (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108520312A (en) * | 2018-03-14 | 2018-09-11 | 北京电子工程总体研究所 | A kind of naval warfare air defense disposition optimum design method |
| CN108917481A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2018-11-30 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is structured the formation effective width |
| CN114036783A (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-02-11 | 中国人民解放军96901部队 | Line target function damage judgment method based on truncation mechanism and damage calculation model |
| CN114877751A (en) * | 2022-06-17 | 2022-08-09 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining suspension depth of suspension type interception bomb |
| CN115292653A (en) * | 2022-06-30 | 2022-11-04 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining examination boundary of action range of suspension type intercepting bullet array |
| CN116625180A (en) * | 2023-05-10 | 2023-08-22 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for measuring distance between adjacent falling points of suspension type deep-spring array |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4961393A (en) * | 1982-08-30 | 1990-10-09 | Murray Myles N | Anti-projectile protection fence and method for marine surface vessels |
| US6714845B2 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2004-03-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and apparatus for intercepting an evading target alerted at seeker turn-on |
| CN101226043A (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-23 | 孙珠峰 | Decussation stereo torpedo catching net |
| KR101211518B1 (en) * | 2011-11-15 | 2012-12-12 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | Apparatus for intercepting underwater weapon and method thereof |
-
2017
- 2017-09-21 CN CN201710886658.0A patent/CN107588685B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4961393A (en) * | 1982-08-30 | 1990-10-09 | Murray Myles N | Anti-projectile protection fence and method for marine surface vessels |
| US6714845B2 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2004-03-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and apparatus for intercepting an evading target alerted at seeker turn-on |
| CN101226043A (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-23 | 孙珠峰 | Decussation stereo torpedo catching net |
| KR101211518B1 (en) * | 2011-11-15 | 2012-12-12 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | Apparatus for intercepting underwater weapon and method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 姚奉亮等: "悬浮式深弹拦截不确定型鱼雷作战模型研究", 《鱼雷技术》 * |
| 赵峰等: "拦截鱼雷作战的深弹布设优化决策模型", 《系统工程与电子技术》 * |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108520312A (en) * | 2018-03-14 | 2018-09-11 | 北京电子工程总体研究所 | A kind of naval warfare air defense disposition optimum design method |
| CN108520312B (en) * | 2018-03-14 | 2021-09-10 | 北京电子工程总体研究所 | Offshore combat air defense deployment optimization design method |
| CN108917481A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2018-11-30 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is structured the formation effective width |
| CN108917481B (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2019-06-25 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | A method of determining that floated interceptor is structured the formation effective width |
| CN114036783A (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-02-11 | 中国人民解放军96901部队 | Line target function damage judgment method based on truncation mechanism and damage calculation model |
| CN114036783B (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-03-22 | 中国人民解放军96901部队 | Line target function damage judgment method based on truncation mechanism and damage calculation model |
| CN114877751A (en) * | 2022-06-17 | 2022-08-09 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining suspension depth of suspension type interception bomb |
| CN115292653A (en) * | 2022-06-30 | 2022-11-04 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining examination boundary of action range of suspension type intercepting bullet array |
| CN115292653B (en) * | 2022-06-30 | 2023-06-13 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for determining evaluation boundary of action range of suspension type interception bomb array |
| CN116625180A (en) * | 2023-05-10 | 2023-08-22 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Method for measuring distance between adjacent falling points of suspension type deep-spring array |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN107588685B (en) | 2019-07-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107588685A (en) | It is a kind of to determine that floated interceptor is most preferably structured the formation the method for spacing | |
| CN107300691B (en) | A kind of passive co-interfere method of distribution for Antiship Missile Terminal Guidance Radar | |
| CN108318032A (en) | A kind of unmanned aerial vehicle flight path Intelligent planning method considering Attack Defence | |
| CN107390190B (en) | A kind of Multi-Target Passive co-interfere method formed into columns based on distribution | |
| CN108534614B (en) | A kind of real-time Predictor-corrector guidance method of three-dimensional omnidirectional | |
| CN108520312A (en) | A kind of naval warfare air defense disposition optimum design method | |
| CN104740812B (en) | A kind of control method of fire extinguisher bomb | |
| CN115238226B (en) | Calculation method for air defense effective killing area | |
| Kim et al. | Guidance synthesis for evasive maneuver of anti-ship missiles against close-in weapon systems | |
| CN111707148A (en) | Multi-missile cooperative guidance method and system under time-varying delay condition | |
| CN108917481B (en) | A method of determining that floated interceptor is structured the formation effective width | |
| CN1332171C (en) | Method for computing damage effects of pre-set explosure bomb with proximity fuze to antiship missle | |
| CN115061495B (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle group countermeasure autonomous control method based on eagle pigeon game | |
| CN112379599B (en) | Three-dimensional cooperative guidance method for air maneuvering target | |
| CN113703479A (en) | Weapon configuration method and system based on high-density value and large depth | |
| CN103712524A (en) | Combined type air-defense equipment | |
| Zuoe et al. | Study on vertical attack penetration probability of anti-ship missile | |
| RU2005140895A (en) | METHOD OF SURVIVING A GROUP TARGET BATTLE WITH A CLOSED FIRE POSITION BY UNMANAGED APPLIANCES AND A SYSTEM FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION | |
| CN112182898B (en) | Kinetic energy interception primary-secondary type reentry warhead end encounter discrimination method | |
| CN106123692B (en) | A kind of stealthy method of 3-D spraying | |
| CN108920827A (en) | Burst-firing hit rate test method | |
| CN101676676A (en) | Device for launching air bombs for 'intercepting' torpedo attacks and method using same | |
| Lappi et al. | Effects of terrain in computational methods for indirect fire | |
| CN117371256B (en) | Multi-type multi-number platform deployment setting scheme planning method | |
| Huxley | Emerging Technology: No Conventional Wisdom? |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |