CN107563119A - Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment - Google Patents
Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107563119A CN107563119A CN201710811377.9A CN201710811377A CN107563119A CN 107563119 A CN107563119 A CN 107563119A CN 201710811377 A CN201710811377 A CN 201710811377A CN 107563119 A CN107563119 A CN 107563119A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- index
- evaluation index
- value
- prospect
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 56
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 188
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010063659 Aversion Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
本发明提供了一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法及装置。该方法包括:获取评价对象对应的预设数量的评价指标的相关数据;对所述预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理;根据评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系;根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值;利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量。本发明能够处理多源异构、类型多变的数据,提高该方法的适用范围;通过前景计算公式还可以不同风险偏好对应评价结果,提高评价结果的客观性与准确性。
The invention provides a service quality evaluation method and device suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment. The method includes: obtaining relevant data of a preset number of evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation object; preprocessing the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators; constructing an index evaluation system according to the evaluation purpose and the characteristics of the evaluation object; according to the preprocessing Calculate the standard prospect value of each evaluation index based on the relevant data of the final evaluation index; use the evidence reasoning method and the prospect value of the preset number of evaluation indexes to calculate the service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system. The invention can process multi-source heterogeneous and variable-type data, and improve the scope of application of the method; through the prospect calculation formula, different risk preferences can be used to correspond to evaluation results, thereby improving the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation results.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及计算机技术领域,尤其涉及一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法及装置。The invention relates to the field of computer technology, in particular to a service quality evaluation method and device suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment.
背景技术Background technique
为提高服务水平,相关技术中对医院服务质量进行评价,根据医院的服务价比、诊疗效果及诊疗体验和精准度,对各个评价指标作加权处理,最终得到对医院的全面评价。然后,具体实现时,由于从医院获取的数据无法直接计算,且仅根据重要性加权来评价,导致评价结果包含主观因素,有一定的偏差。In order to improve the service level, the service quality of the hospital is evaluated in related technologies, and each evaluation index is weighted according to the hospital's service price ratio, diagnosis and treatment effect, diagnosis and treatment experience and accuracy, and finally a comprehensive evaluation of the hospital is obtained. However, in the actual implementation, since the data obtained from the hospital cannot be directly calculated, and the evaluation is only based on the importance weight, the evaluation results contain subjective factors and have certain deviations.
发明内容Contents of the invention
针对相关技术中的缺陷,本发明提供了一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法及装置,用于解决相关技术中存在的技术问题。Aiming at the defects in the related art, the present invention provides a service quality evaluation method and device suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment, which are used to solve the technical problems existing in the related art.
第一方面,本发明实施例提供了一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法,所述方法包括:In the first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a service quality evaluation method suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment, the method comprising:
获取评价对象对应的预设数量的评价指标的相关数据;Obtain the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation object;
对所述预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理;Preprocessing the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators;
根据评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系;Build an index evaluation system according to the evaluation purpose and the characteristics of the evaluation object;
根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值;Calculate the standard prospect value of each evaluation index according to the relevant data of the evaluation index after preprocessing;
利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量。The service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system is calculated by using an evidence reasoning method and the prospect values of the preset number of evaluation indexes.
可选地,对所述预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理,包括:Optionally, preprocessing the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators includes:
针对所述预设数量的评价指标中的定性指标,根据该定性指标的评价等级转换为均匀分布的区间数。For the qualitative indicators in the preset number of evaluation indicators, the evaluation grades of the qualitative indicators are converted into uniformly distributed interval numbers.
可选地,根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值,包括:Optionally, the standard prospect value of each evaluation index is calculated according to the preprocessed evaluation index related data, including:
根据前景值计算公式计算每个评价指标的原始前景值;Calculate the original prospect value of each evaluation index according to the prospect value calculation formula;
根据指标标准化公式对每个评价指标的原始前景值进行标准化得到每个评价指标的标准前景值。According to the index standardization formula, the original prospect value of each evaluation index is standardized to obtain the standard prospect value of each evaluation index.
可选地,所述前景值计算公式由决策权重函数和价值函数相乘得到。Optionally, the prospect value calculation formula is obtained by multiplying a decision weight function and a value function.
可选地,利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量,包括:Optionally, calculating the service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system by using the evidence reasoning method and the prospect value of the preset number of evaluation indicators, including:
根据每个评价指标的前景值将该评价指标数据转换为预设框架下的基本信度分配函数的形式;According to the prospect value of each evaluation index, the evaluation index data is converted into the form of the basic reliability distribution function under the preset framework;
利用所述证据推理方法对所述预设数量个评价指标对应的基本信度分配函数进行迭代,得到所述评价对象的信度分配函数,并由各等级的前景值定义得到对应的前景值作为服务质量。Using the evidence reasoning method to iterate the basic reliability distribution function corresponding to the preset number of evaluation indicators to obtain the reliability distribution function of the evaluation object, and obtain the corresponding prospect value from the definition of the prospect value of each level as service quality.
第二方面,本发明实施例还提供了一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价装置,所述装置包括:In the second aspect, the embodiment of the present invention also provides a service quality evaluation device suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment, the device includes:
数据获取模块,用于获取评价对象对应的预设数量的评价指标的相关数据;A data acquisition module, configured to acquire relevant data of a preset number of evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation object;
数据预处理模块,用于对所述预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理;A data preprocessing module, configured to preprocess the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators;
评价体系构建模块,用于根据评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系;The evaluation system construction module is used to construct the index evaluation system according to the evaluation purpose and evaluation object characteristics;
前景值计算模块,用于根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值;The prospect value calculation module is used to calculate the standard prospect value of each evaluation index according to the relevant data of the preprocessed evaluation index;
服务质量评价模块,用于利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量。The service quality evaluation module is used to calculate the service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system by using the evidence reasoning method and the prospect value of the preset number of evaluation indicators.
可选地,所述数据预处理模块包括:Optionally, the data preprocessing module includes:
定性指标转换单元,用于针对所述预设数量的评价指标中的定性指标,根据该定性指标的评价等级转换为均匀分布的区间数。The qualitative index converting unit is configured to convert the qualitative index in the preset number of evaluation indexes into uniformly distributed interval numbers according to the evaluation level of the qualitative index.
可选地,所述前景值计算模块包括:Optionally, the foreground value calculation module includes:
原始前景值计算单元,用于根据前景值计算公式计算每个评价指标的原始前景值;The original prospect value calculation unit is used to calculate the original prospect value of each evaluation index according to the prospect value calculation formula;
标准前景值计算单元,用于根据指标标准化公式对每个评价指标的原始前景值进行标准化得到每个评价指标的标准前景值。The standard prospect value calculation unit is used to standardize the original prospect value of each evaluation index according to the index standardization formula to obtain the standard prospect value of each evaluation index.
可选地,所述前景值计算公式由决策权重函数和价值函数相乘得到。Optionally, the prospect value calculation formula is obtained by multiplying a decision weight function and a value function.
可选地,所述服务质量评价模块包括:Optionally, the service quality evaluation module includes:
基本信度转换模块,用于根据每个评价指标的前景值将该评价指标数据转换为预设框架下的基本信度分配函数的形式;The basic reliability conversion module is used to convert the evaluation index data into the form of the basic reliability distribution function under the preset framework according to the prospect value of each evaluation index;
基本信度迭代模块,用于利用所述证据推理方法对所述预设数量个评价指标对应的基本信度分配函数进行迭代,得到所述评价对象的信度分配函数,并由各等级的前景值定义得到对应的前景值作为服务质量。The basic reliability iteration module is used to use the evidence reasoning method to iterate the basic reliability distribution function corresponding to the preset number of evaluation indicators to obtain the reliability distribution function of the evaluation object, and the prospects of each level The value definition gets the corresponding foreground value as the quality of service.
与相关技术相比较,本发明对评价对象对应的预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理;根据评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系;根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值;利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量。可见,本发明能够处理多源异构、类型多变的数据,提高该方法的适用范围;通过前景计算公式还可以不同风险偏好对应评价结果,提高评价结果的客观性与准确性。Compared with related technologies, the present invention preprocesses the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation object; constructs an index evaluation system according to the evaluation purpose and the characteristics of the evaluation object; The standard prospect value of the evaluation index; use the evidence reasoning method and the prospect value of the preset number of evaluation indexes to calculate the service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system. It can be seen that the present invention can handle multi-source, heterogeneous and variable-type data and improve the scope of application of the method; through the prospect calculation formula, different risk preferences can be used to correspond to evaluation results, improving the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation results.
附图说明Description of drawings
为了更清楚地说明本发明实施例或相关技术中的技术方案,下面将对实施例或相关技术描述中所需要使用的附图作简单地介绍,显而易见地,下面描述中的附图仅仅是本发明的一些实施例,对于本领域普通技术人员来讲,在不付出创造性劳动的前提下,还可以根据这些图获得其他的附图。In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or related technologies, the following will briefly introduce the drawings that need to be used in the descriptions of the embodiments or related technologies. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only For some embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art can also obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative effort.
图1是本发明实施例提供的一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法的流程示意图;Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of a service quality evaluation method suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
图2是多学科医疗微创服务平台的框图;Figure 2 is a block diagram of a multidisciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform;
图3为价值函数曲线示意图;Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of the value function curve;
图4是本发明实施例提供的一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价装置的框图。Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a service quality evaluation device suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
具体实施方式detailed description
下面将结合本发明实施例中的附图,对本发明实施例中的技术方案进行清楚、完整地描述,显然,所描述的实施例仅仅是本发明一部分实施例,而不是全部的实施例。基于本发明中的实施例,本领域普通技术人员在没有做出创造性劳动前提下所获得的所有其他实施例,都属于本发明保护的范围。The following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some, not all, embodiments of the present invention. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by persons of ordinary skill in the art without making creative efforts belong to the protection scope of the present invention.
本发明实施例提供的适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法可以应用于不同的服务平台。为方便理解,本发明一实施例中将该方法应用于多学科医疗微创服务平台。该多学科医疗微创服务平台至少包括:医疗智能微创问诊服务系统、辅助诊断服务系统以及移动远程协同服务系统。该多学科医疗微创服务平台利用不同的系统可以采集各评价指标对应的相关数据。可理解的是,上述相关数据包括定量数据和定性数据。下面结合该多学科医疗微创服务平台对本发明提供的方法作详细描述。The service quality evaluation method suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment provided by the embodiment of the present invention can be applied to different service platforms. For the convenience of understanding, in an embodiment of the present invention, the method is applied to a multidisciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform. The multidisciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform includes at least: a medical intelligent minimally invasive consultation service system, an auxiliary diagnosis service system, and a mobile remote collaborative service system. The multidisciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform can collect relevant data corresponding to each evaluation index by using different systems. It can be understood that the above relevant data includes quantitative data and qualitative data. The method provided by the present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with the multidisciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform.
图1为本发明一实施例提供的一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法的流程示意图。参见图1,该基适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价方法可以应用于计算机、移动终端或者软件上,本实施例中以计算机为例进行说明。该方法包括步骤101~步骤105共5步,分别为:Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of a service quality evaluation method applicable to multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 1 , the service quality evaluation method applicable to multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment can be applied to computers, mobile terminals or software. In this embodiment, a computer is used as an example for illustration. The method comprises a total of 5 steps from step 101 to step 105, which are respectively:
步骤101,获取评价对象对应的预设数量的评价指标的相关数据。Step 101 , acquiring relevant data of a preset number of evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation object.
计算机从上述多学科医疗微创服务平台的不同系统获取评价对象对应的评价指标的相关数据。为减少计算量,本实施例中,可以获取预设时间段内,预设数量的评价指标的相关数据。当然,在计算机的计算资源以及计算时间允许的时间,可以获取各评价指标的所有相关数据。本领域技术人员可以根据具体场景,对上述预设时间和预设数量进行设置,调整后的方案同样落入本发明的保护范围。The computer obtains the relevant data of the evaluation index corresponding to the evaluation object from different systems of the above-mentioned multidisciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform. In order to reduce the amount of calculation, in this embodiment, relevant data of a preset number of evaluation indicators within a preset time period may be acquired. Of course, all relevant data of each evaluation index can be obtained within the time allowed by the computer's computing resources and computing time. Those skilled in the art can set the above-mentioned preset time and preset quantity according to specific scenarios, and the adjusted scheme also falls within the protection scope of the present invention.
步骤102,对所述预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理。Step 102, preprocessing the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators.
本实施例中,预设数量的评价指标中包括定性指标和定量指标。由于定性指标不能直接参与计算。因此需要对各定性指标进行预处理,将把定性指标转换定量指标。In this embodiment, the preset number of evaluation indicators includes qualitative indicators and quantitative indicators. Because qualitative indicators cannot directly participate in the calculation. Therefore, it is necessary to preprocess each qualitative index and convert the qualitative index into a quantitative index.
本发明一实施例中,采用区间数的方式对定性指标进行转换。例如某个定性指标评价有4个评价等级即优、良、中、差,这4个等级对应的区间数就是[0.75,1],[0.5,0.75],[0.25,0.5]和[0,0.25]。若定性指标的相关数据是{(优,0.3),(良,0.7)},是具有置性度的数据即“优”的可能性是0.3,“良”的可能性是0.7。预处理之后,该定性指标的相关数据变成了{([0.75,1],0.3),([0.5,0.75],0.7)},“优”、“良”数据分别转换成区间数。In an embodiment of the present invention, the qualitative index is converted by means of interval numbers. For example, a qualitative index evaluation has 4 evaluation grades, namely excellent, good, medium and poor. The interval numbers corresponding to these 4 grades are [0.75,1], [0.5,0.75], [0.25,0.5] and [0, 0.25]. If the relevant data of the qualitative index is {(excellent, 0.3), (good, 0.7)}, it is data with a degree of confidence, that is, the possibility of "excellent" is 0.3, and the possibility of "good" is 0.7. After preprocessing, the relevant data of the qualitative index becomes {([0.75,1], 0.3), ([0.5,0.75], 0.7)}, and the "excellent" and "good" data are converted into interval numbers respectively.
步骤103,根据评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系。本实施例中,依托多学科医疗微创服务平台,计算机评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系。例如,参见图2,本发明一实施例中就多学医疗微创服务质量进行评价,一级指标为服务质量,二级指标分别为使用平台中的三大主要系统的服务质量,即问诊服务系统服务质量、辅助诊断服务系统服务质量和移动远程协同服务系统服务质量,三级指标为相应系统的模块服务质量,而每个模块又有一些评价指标,比如电子病例模块中包括电子病历类目数、交互人性化程度等,通过上述方法,可以构建多层级的指标体系,用于后续的方法运用。Step 103, constructing an index evaluation system according to the evaluation purpose and the characteristics of the evaluation objects. In this embodiment, relying on the multi-disciplinary medical minimally invasive service platform, the purpose of computer evaluation and the characteristics of evaluation objects are used to construct an index evaluation system. For example, referring to Fig. 2, in one embodiment of the present invention, the service quality of multi-learning medical minimally invasive service is evaluated. The service quality of the service system, the service quality of the auxiliary diagnosis service system, and the service quality of the mobile remote collaborative service system. The third-level indicators are the module service quality of the corresponding system, and each module has some evaluation indicators. For example, the electronic case module includes electronic medical records. The number of items, the degree of humanization of interaction, etc., through the above method, a multi-level index system can be constructed for subsequent method application.
步骤104,根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值。Step 104, calculating the standard foreground value of each evaluation index according to the preprocessed evaluation index related data.
本发明实施例中,利用前景值计算公式计算每个评价指标的标准前景值。In the embodiment of the present invention, the standard foreground value of each evaluation index is calculated using the foreground value calculation formula.
首先,根据前景值计算公式计算每个评价指标的原始前景值。该前景值计算公式由决策权重函数和价值函数相乘得到,公式如下所示:First, the original foreground value of each evaluation index is calculated according to the foreground value calculation formula. The calculation formula of the prospect value is obtained by multiplying the decision weight function and the value function, and the formula is as follows:
价值函数:、value function:
决策权重函数:Decision weight function:
对于定性指标和定量指标的Δx的计算方法如下: The calculation method of Δx for qualitative indicators and quantitative indicators is as follows:
其中hn,i表示定量指标的评价值,Hn,i表示定性指标的某个评价等级转换后的区间数,和分别表示该定量指标、定性指标的平均值。而α是代表决策者风险偏好的参数;λ是风险规避参数,即在损失的情况下(Δx<0),损失比收益的图像(参见图3)更加陡峭;p表示该定量指标或定性指标被评价为某个值或某个等级的置信度。Among them, h n, i represent the evaluation value of the quantitative index, H n, i represent the number of intervals converted from a certain evaluation level of the qualitative index, with Respectively represent the quantitative index, the average value of the qualitative index. And α is a parameter that represents the risk preference of the decision maker; λ is a risk aversion parameter, that is, in the case of loss (Δx<0), the image of loss is steeper than the gain (see Figure 3); p represents the quantitative index or qualitative index Confidence assessed as a value or a level.
定性指标的转换方法如下:将定性指标的各个评价等级按照[0,1]的区间转换为均匀分布的区间数,即其中 N为该定性指标评价的等级总数。The conversion method of the qualitative index is as follows: convert each evaluation level of the qualitative index into a uniformly distributed interval number according to the interval [0,1], that is in N is the total number of grades evaluated by the qualitative index.
其次,根据指标标准化公式对每个评价指标的原始前景值进行标准化得到每个评价指标的标准前景值。Secondly, according to the index standardization formula, the original prospect value of each evaluation index is standardized to obtain the standard prospect value of each evaluation index.
本实施例中,指标标准化公式为In this embodiment, the index standardization formula is
其中V(ei)和V(ei)*()分别表示根据指标标准化公式计算得到的原始前景值和经过标准化得到的标准前景值,mi表示该指标所采集到的数据中最小的值,Mi表示该指标所采集到的数据中最大的值。where V(e i ) and V(e i ) * ( ) respectively represent the original foreground value calculated according to the standardization formula of the index and the standard foreground value obtained after standardization, m i represents the smallest value in the data collected by the index, and Mi represents the largest value in the data collected by the index value.
对于必选指标的调整方法:Adjustment method for mandatory indicators:
其中V(ei)*和分别表示必选指标在调整前后的原始前景值和标准前景值,η表示修正因子。where V(e i ) * and Respectively represent the original prospect value and standard prospect value of the required indicators before and after adjustment, and η represents the correction factor.
鉴于标准化之后的标准前景值取值在0到1之间,因此标准前景值的均值可以设置为0.5。若V(ei)*≥0.5,则认为必选指标的标准前景值V(ei)*超过平均值,因此V(ei)*达到基本要求,则值保持不变;若V(ei)*<0.5,则V(ei)*没有达到基本要求,此时需要用修正因子减小该必选指标的标准前景值。Since the value of the standard foreground value after standardization is between 0 and 1, the mean value of the standard foreground value can be set to 0.5. If V(e i ) * ≥ 0.5, it is considered that the standard prospect value V(e i ) * of the mandatory indicator exceeds the average value, so V(e i ) * meets the basic requirements, and the value remains unchanged; if V(e i ) * <0.5, then V(e i ) * does not meet the basic requirements, and a correction factor is needed to reduce the standard prospect value of this mandatory indicator.
对于优选指标的调整方法:For the adjustment method of the preferred index:
其中V(e′i)*和V(ek)*分别表示同属于一个上级指标的必选指标和优选指标的标准前景值,μ是优选指标的调整因子。Among them, V(e′ i ) * and V(e k ) * respectively represent the standard prospect value of the mandatory index and the preferred index belonging to the same superior index, and μ is the adjustment factor of the preferred index.
若该优选指标的标准前景值V(ek)*≥0.5并且同属于一个上级指标的所有必选指标的标准前景值V(e′i)*≥0.5(即他们都达到了最基本的要求),此类情况最好,因此通过调整因子放大该优选指标的标准前景值。If the standard prospect value V(e k ) * ≥ 0.5 of the preferred indicator and the standard prospect value V(e′ i ) * ≥ 0.5 of all mandatory indicators belonging to a superior indicator (that is, they all meet the most basic requirements ), such cases are best, so the standard outlook value of this preferred indicator is amplified by the adjustment factor.
若该优选指标的标准前景值V(ek)*<0并且同属于一个上级指标的所有必选指标的标准前景值V(e′i)*<0.5,即必选指标达到了基本要求而优选指标没有达到基本要求。此时对该优选指标的标准前景值不做调整。If the standard prospect value V(e k ) * of the preferred index <0 and the standard prospect value V(e′ i ) * of all mandatory indexes belonging to the same superior index is <0.5, that is, the mandatory index meets the basic requirements and The preferred indicators did not meet the basic requirements. At this time, no adjustment will be made to the standard outlook value of the preferred index.
若V(e′i)*和V(ek)*的标准前景值的取值属于其他情况,则表示必选指标都没有达到基本要求,此时通过调整因子让减小该优选指标的标准前景值。If the values of the standard prospect values of V(e′ i ) * and V(e k ) * belong to other situations, it means that none of the mandatory indicators meet the basic requirements, and at this time, the standard of the preferred indicator can be reduced by adjusting the factor foreground value.
步骤105,利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量。Step 105, using the evidence reasoning method and the prospect values of the preset number of evaluation indicators to calculate the service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system.
本发明实施例中,在利用证据推理方法进行指标合成时,根据每个评价指标的前景值将该评价指标数据转换为预设框架下的基本信度分配函数的形式:In the embodiment of the present invention, when the evidence reasoning method is used for index synthesis, the evaluation index data is converted into the form of the basic reliability assignment function under the preset framework according to the prospect value of each evaluation index:
S(ei)={(Hn,βn,i),n=1,...,N};S(e i )={(H n ,β n,i ), n=1,...,N};
其中Hn代表某个等级,一般N=5,βn,i代表指标被分配到某个等级上的置性度。Wherein H n represents a certain level, generally N=5, β n, i represent the degree of setting that the indicator is assigned to a certain level.
转换公式如下:The conversion formula is as follows:
βj+1,i=1-βj,i,其中j的计算公式为:β j+1,i =1-β j,i , where the calculation formula of j is:
然后,利用证据推理方法对所述预设数量个评价指标对应的基本信度分配函数进行迭代,得到所述评价对象的信度分配函数,并由各等级的前景值定义得到对应的前景值作为服务质量。Then, use the evidence reasoning method to iterate the basic reliability distribution function corresponding to the preset number of evaluation indicators to obtain the reliability distribution function of the evaluation object, and obtain the corresponding prospect value from the definition of the prospect value of each level as service quality.
其中,证据推理方法如下式所示:Among them, the evidence reasoning method is shown in the following formula:
S(y)={(Hn,βn),n=1,...,N}。S(y)={(H n , β n ), n=1, . . . , N}.
其中mn,i是第i个评价指标在标评价体系下Hn上的基本可信度分配;是在第i个评价指标上由于指标权重引起的不确定的基本可信度分配;是在第i个评价指标上由于指标权重引起的不确定的基本可信度分配;K为冲突因子;mn是上层指标在公共识别框架Hn上的基本可信度分配;是上层指标由于指标权重引起的不确定的基本可信度分配;是上层指标由于指标权重引起的不确定的基本可信度分配;βn是上层指标分配在等级n上的置信度,βH是上层指标未分配任何等级的置信度,S(y)是上层指标在各等级上的置信度分配函数。Among them, m n, i is the basic credibility distribution of the i-th evaluation index on H n under the standard evaluation system; is the uncertain basic credibility distribution caused by the index weight on the i-th evaluation index; is the uncertain basic credibility distribution caused by the index weight on the i-th evaluation indicator; K is the conflict factor; m n is the basic credibility distribution of the upper-level indicators on the public identification framework H n ; It is the uncertain basic credibility distribution of the upper index due to the index weight; is the uncertain basic credibility distribution of the upper index due to the index weight; β n is the confidence assigned by the upper index on level n, β H is the confidence that the upper index is not assigned any level, and S(y) is the upper index Confidence distribution function of indicators at each level.
利用上述证据推理方法进行迭代,最终获得顶层指标的评价,即评价对象的评价结果。Using the above evidence reasoning method to iterate, finally obtain the evaluation of the top-level indicators, that is, the evaluation results of the evaluation object.
本实施例中,定义各等级上的标准前景值在[0,1]之间是均匀分布的,即V(Hn)=(n-1)/(N-1)。根据评价对象在各等级上的置信度分配函数以及该等级上的前景值,可以计算得到评价对象的前景值即该评价对象的服务质量。In this embodiment, it is defined that the standard foreground values at each level are uniformly distributed between [0, 1], that is, V(H n )=(n-1)/(N-1). According to the confidence distribution function of the evaluation object at each level and the prospect value of the level, the prospect value of the evaluation object, that is, the service quality of the evaluation object, can be calculated.
重复执行本发明实施例提供的方法,可以计算得到多个评价对象的前景值,从而可以对多个评价方案进行比较。By repeatedly executing the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention, the foreground values of multiple evaluation objects can be calculated, so that multiple evaluation schemes can be compared.
可见,本发明能够处理多源异构、类型多变的数据,提高该方法的适用范围;通过前景计算公式还可以不同风险偏好对应评价结果,提高评价结果的客观性与准确性。另外,本发明能够对复杂全面的指标体系逐级合成,获得最终定量的评价结果用于比较分析,为评价方案提供可靠的参考依据。It can be seen that the present invention can handle multi-source, heterogeneous and variable-type data and improve the scope of application of the method; through the prospect calculation formula, different risk preferences can be used to correspond to evaluation results, improving the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation results. In addition, the present invention can synthesize complex and comprehensive index systems step by step, obtain final quantitative evaluation results for comparative analysis, and provide reliable references for evaluation schemes.
图4是本发明实施例提供的一种适用于多学科微创治疗的服务质量评价装置的框图。参见图4,该装置包括:Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a service quality evaluation device suitable for multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to Figure 4, the device includes:
数据获取模块401,用于获取评价对象对应的预设数量的评价指标的相关数据;A data acquisition module 401, configured to acquire relevant data of a preset number of evaluation indicators corresponding to the evaluation object;
数据预处理模块402,用于对所述预设数量的评价指标的相关数据进行预处理;A data preprocessing module 402, configured to preprocess the relevant data of the preset number of evaluation indicators;
评价体系构建模块403,用于根据评价目的和评价对象特征构建指标评价体系;An evaluation system construction module 403, used to construct an index evaluation system according to the evaluation purpose and the characteristics of the evaluation object;
前景值计算模块404,用于根据预处理后的评价指标的相关数据计算每个评价指标的标准前景值;Foreground value calculation module 404, used to calculate the standard foreground value of each evaluation index according to the relevant data of the evaluation index after preprocessing;
服务质量评价模块405,用于利用证据推理方法以及所述预设数量个评价指标的前景值计算所述指标评价体系下所述评价对象的服务质量。The service quality evaluation module 405 is configured to calculate the service quality of the evaluation object under the index evaluation system by using the evidence reasoning method and the prospect value of the preset number of evaluation indicators.
可选地,所述数据预处理模块402包括:Optionally, the data preprocessing module 402 includes:
定性指标转换单元,用于针对所述预设数量的评价指标中的定性指标,根据该定性指标的评价等级转换为均匀分布的区间数。The qualitative index converting unit is configured to convert the qualitative index in the preset number of evaluation indexes into uniformly distributed interval numbers according to the evaluation level of the qualitative index.
可选地,所述前景值计算模块404包括:Optionally, the foreground value calculation module 404 includes:
原始前景值计算单元,用于根据前景值计算公式计算每个评价指标的原始前景值;The original prospect value calculation unit is used to calculate the original prospect value of each evaluation index according to the prospect value calculation formula;
标准前景值计算单元,用于根据指标标准化公式对每个评价指标的原始前景值进行标准化得到每个评价指标的标准前景值。The standard prospect value calculation unit is used to standardize the original prospect value of each evaluation index according to the index standardization formula to obtain the standard prospect value of each evaluation index.
可选地,所述前景值计算公式由决策权重函数和价值函数相乘得到。Optionally, the prospect value calculation formula is obtained by multiplying a decision weight function and a value function.
可选地,所述服务质量评价模块405包括:Optionally, the service quality evaluation module 405 includes:
基本信度转换模块,用于根据每个评价指标的前景值将该评价指标数据转换为预设框架下的基本信度分配函数的形式;The basic reliability conversion module is used to convert the evaluation index data into the form of the basic reliability distribution function under the preset framework according to the prospect value of each evaluation index;
基本信度迭代模块,用于利用所述证据推理方法对所述预设数量个评价指标对应的基本信度分配函数进行迭代,得到所述评价对象的信度分配函数,并由各等级的前景值定义得到对应的前景值作为服务质量。The basic reliability iteration module is used to use the evidence reasoning method to iterate the basic reliability distribution function corresponding to the preset number of evaluation indicators to obtain the reliability distribution function of the evaluation object, and the prospects of each level The value definition gets the corresponding foreground value as the quality of service.
需要说明的是,本发明实施例提供的装置与上述方法是一一对应的关系,上述方法的实施细节同样适用于上述装置,本发明实施例不再对上述系统进行详细说明。It should be noted that there is a one-to-one correspondence relationship between the device provided in the embodiment of the present invention and the above method, and the implementation details of the above method are also applicable to the above device, and the embodiment of the present invention will not describe the above system in detail.
本发明的说明书中,说明了大量具体细节。然而,能够理解,本发明的实施例可以在没有这些具体细节的情况下实践。在一些实例中,并未详细示出公知的方法、结构和技术,以便不模糊对本说明书的理解。In the description of the invention, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known methods, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
类似地,应当理解,为了精简本发明公开并帮助理解各个发明方面中的一个或多个,在上面对本发明的示例性实施例的描述中,本发明的各个特征有时被一起分组到单个实施例、图、或者对其的描述中。然而,并不应将该公开的方法解释呈反映如下意图:即所要求保护的本发明要求比在每个权利要求中所明确记载的特征更多的特征。更确切地说,如下面的权利要求书所反映的那样,发明方面在于少于前面公开的单个实施例的所有特征。因此,遵循具体实施方式的权利要求书由此明确地并入该具体实施方式,其中每个权利要求本身都作为本发明的单独实施例。Similarly, it should be appreciated that in the above description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, in order to streamline the present disclosure and to facilitate understanding of one or more of the various inventive aspects, various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together into a single embodiment , figure, or description of it. This method of disclosure, however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of this invention.
本领域技术人员可以理解,可以对实施例中的设备中的模块进行自适应性地改变并且把它们设置在于该实施例不同的一个或多个设备中。可以把实施例中的模块或单元或组件组合成一个模块或单元或组件,以及此外可以把它们分成多个子模块或子单元或子组件。除了这样的特征和/或过程或者单元中的至少一些是互相排斥之处,可以采用任何组合对本说明书(包括伴随的权利要求、摘要和附图)中公开的所有特征以及如此公开的任何方法或者设备的所有过程或单元进行组合。除非另外明确陈述,本说明书(包括伴随的权利要求、摘要和附图)中公开的每个特征可以由提供相同、等同或相似目的的替代特征来代替。Those skilled in the art can understand that the modules in the device in the embodiment can be adaptively changed and installed in one or more devices different from the embodiment. Modules or units or components in the embodiments may be combined into one module or unit or component, and furthermore may be divided into a plurality of sub-modules or sub-units or sub-assemblies. All features disclosed in this specification (including accompanying claims, abstract and drawings) and any method or method so disclosed may be used in any combination, except where at least some of such features and/or processes or units are mutually exclusive. All processes or units of equipment are combined. Each feature disclosed in this specification (including accompanying claims, abstract and drawings) may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent or similar purpose, unless expressly stated otherwise.
此外,本领域的技术人员能够理解,尽管在此所述的一些实施例包括其它实施例中所包括的某些特征而不是其它特征,但是不同实施例的特征的组合意味着处于本发明的范围之内并且形成不同的实施例。例如,在下面的权利要求书中,所要求保护的实施例的任意之一都可以以任意的组合方式来使用。Furthermore, those skilled in the art will understand that although some embodiments described herein include some features included in other embodiments but not others, combinations of features from different embodiments are meant to be within the scope of the invention. and form different embodiments. For example, in the following claims, any of the claimed embodiments may be used in any combination.
本发明的各个部件实施例可以以硬件实现,或者以在一个或者多个处理器上运行的软件模块实现,或者以它们的组合实现。本领域的技术人员应当理解,可以在实践中使用微处理器或者数字信号处理器(DSP)来实现根据本发明实施例的一种浏览器终端的设备中的一些或者全部部件的一些或者全部功能。本发明还可以实现为用于执行这里所描述的方法的一部分或者全部的设备或者装置程序(例如,计算机程序和计算机程序产品)。这样的实现本发明的程序可以存储在计算机可读介质上,或者可以具有一个或者多个信号的形式。这样的信号可以从因特网网站上下载得到,或者在载体信号上提供,或者以任何其他形式提供。The various component embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in hardware, or in software modules running on one or more processors, or in a combination thereof. Those skilled in the art should understand that a microprocessor or a digital signal processor (DSP) can be used in practice to implement some or all functions of some or all components in a browser terminal device according to an embodiment of the present invention . The present invention can also be implemented as an apparatus or an apparatus program (for example, a computer program and a computer program product) for performing a part or all of the methods described herein. Such a program for realizing the present invention may be stored on a computer-readable medium, or may be in the form of one or more signals. Such a signal may be downloaded from an Internet site, or provided on a carrier signal, or provided in any other form.
应该注意的是上述实施例对本发明进行说明而不是对本发明进行限制,并且本领域技术人员在不脱离所附权利要求的范围的情况下可设计出替换实施例。在权利要求中,不应将位于括号之间的任何参考符号构造成对权利要求的限制。单词“包含”不排除存在未列在权利要求中的元件或步骤。位于元件之前的单词“一”或“一个”不排除存在多个这样的元件。本发明可以借助于包括有若干不同元件的硬件以及借助于适当编程的计算机来实现。在列举了若干装置的单元权利要求中,这些装置中的若干个可以是通过同一个硬件项来具体体现。单词第一、第二、以及第三等的使用不表示任何顺序。可将这些单词解释为名称。It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word "comprising" does not exclude the presence of elements or steps not listed in a claim. The word "a" or "an" preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The invention can be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In a unit claim enumerating several means, several of these means can be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The use of the words first, second, and third, etc. does not indicate any order. These words can be interpreted as names.
最后应说明的是:以上各实施例仅用以说明本发明的技术方案,而非对其限制;尽管参照前述各实施例对本发明进行了详细的说明,本领域的普通技术人员应当理解:其依然可以对前述各实施例所记载的技术方案进行修改,或者对其中部分或者全部技术特征进行等同替换;而这些修改或者替换,并不使相应技术方案的本质脱离本发明各实施例技术方案的范围,其均应涵盖在本发明的权利要求和说明书的范围当中。Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than limiting them; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that: It is still possible to modify the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or perform equivalent replacements for some or all of the technical features; and these modifications or replacements do not make the essence of the corresponding technical solutions deviate from the technical solutions of the various embodiments of the present invention. All of them should be covered by the scope of the claims and description of the present invention.
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710811377.9A CN107563119A (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710811377.9A CN107563119A (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107563119A true CN107563119A (en) | 2018-01-09 |
Family
ID=60980354
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710811377.9A Pending CN107563119A (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107563119A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109492877A (en) * | 2018-10-16 | 2019-03-19 | 安徽医科大学第附属医院 | Hospital Informatization evaluation method |
CN109509549A (en) * | 2018-05-28 | 2019-03-22 | 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 | Consulting services provider evaluation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105447633A (en) * | 2015-11-17 | 2016-03-30 | 中国农业大学 | Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof |
CN106503889A (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2017-03-15 | 中南大学 | A kind of subjective and objective integrated evaluating method of land use intensively and device |
CN106502878A (en) * | 2016-11-15 | 2017-03-15 | 北京中电普华信息技术有限公司 | A kind of operation system evaluation methodology and device based on relative maturity |
CN107045674A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-08-15 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Supplier evaluation method based on quantifiable indicator system |
-
2017
- 2017-09-11 CN CN201710811377.9A patent/CN107563119A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105447633A (en) * | 2015-11-17 | 2016-03-30 | 中国农业大学 | Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof |
CN106503889A (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2017-03-15 | 中南大学 | A kind of subjective and objective integrated evaluating method of land use intensively and device |
CN106502878A (en) * | 2016-11-15 | 2017-03-15 | 北京中电普华信息技术有限公司 | A kind of operation system evaluation methodology and device based on relative maturity |
CN107045674A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-08-15 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Supplier evaluation method based on quantifiable indicator system |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
刘芳: "基于证据推理规则的科学基金立项评估方法及应用研究", 《万方学位论文数据库》 * |
宋倩倩: "SaaS服务提供商市场策略研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 经济与管理科学辑》 * |
靳留乾等: "基于证据推理和第3代前景理论的不确定性多属性决策方法", 《控制与决策》 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109509549A (en) * | 2018-05-28 | 2019-03-22 | 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 | Consulting services provider evaluation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN109509549B (en) * | 2018-05-28 | 2024-05-14 | 深圳平安医疗健康科技服务有限公司 | Diagnosis and treatment service provider evaluation method, diagnosis and treatment service provider evaluation device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN109492877A (en) * | 2018-10-16 | 2019-03-19 | 安徽医科大学第附属医院 | Hospital Informatization evaluation method |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN113270197A (en) | Health prediction method, system and storage medium based on artificial intelligence | |
CN112561082A (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for generating model | |
CN113052411A (en) | Data product quality evaluation method and device | |
CN109102142A (en) | A kind of personnel evaluation methods and system based on evaluation criterion tree | |
CN107563119A (en) | Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment | |
CN117726439A (en) | Financial risk data management method based on machine learning | |
CN114566282A (en) | Treatment decision system based on echocardiogram detection report | |
CN112085517A (en) | Coupon issuing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
Shin et al. | Identifying new technology areas based on firm’s internal capabilities | |
KR102360384B1 (en) | System for providing bigdata based reservation price probability distribution validation service for procurement auction | |
Jeans | Converging profile relationships for offshore wind speed and turbulence intensity | |
CN110533454B (en) | Method and system for identifying business object group | |
CN117457159A (en) | Medical main body recommendation method, medical main body recommendation device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
CN116386813A (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for balancing load between operations | |
CN116187803A (en) | Enterprise innovation capability evaluation system based on big data | |
CN104636833B (en) | The method and apparatus for choosing configuration measure | |
CN111260403A (en) | Method and system for pricing delivery in intermediary market | |
CN114692479A (en) | Time probability distribution model training method, distribution time obtaining method and distribution time obtaining device | |
CN109274132A (en) | Data-driven power system real-time scheduling method for maximizing renewable energy output | |
CN115794175B (en) | Technology research and development evaluation system and method based on big data | |
Kirthika et al. | A data-driven deterministic forecast-based probabilistic method for uncertainty estimation of wind power generation | |
CN118536850A (en) | Evaluation method and terminal after power-hydrogen coupling conversion power grid delivery project | |
KR20240138784A (en) | Apparatus and method for creating data-based customized water quality index using RF(random forest) model | |
CN116384762A (en) | Carbon asset rating method and device | |
CN113643160A (en) | Big data service based management system and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180109 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |