CN105447633A - Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof - Google Patents
Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105447633A CN105447633A CN201510789785.XA CN201510789785A CN105447633A CN 105447633 A CN105447633 A CN 105447633A CN 201510789785 A CN201510789785 A CN 201510789785A CN 105447633 A CN105447633 A CN 105447633A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- scientific research
- research institution
- target
- index
- metadata
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a scientific research institution integration evaluation method and a system thereof. The method comprises the following steps of collecting attribute information of a plurality of scientific research institutions and classifying the plurality of scientific research institutions according to the attribute information; according to types of the scientific research institutions, determining a plurality of index metadata of the scientific research institutions; according to the plurality of index metadata, generating index systems corresponding to the types of the scientific research institutions; determining a target type of a target scientific research institution inquired by a user; according to a target index system corresponding to the target type, evaluating and analyzing the target scientific research institution and acquiring an evaluation result. The system comprises an acquisition classification module, an index metadata extraction module, an index system establishing module and a scientific research institution evaluation module. The method and the system provided in the invention are used to evaluate the scientific research institutions, because the respective corresponding index system is used to evaluate the different types of the scientific research institutions, reliability and accuracy of the evaluation result are increased.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to evaluation of institutions technical field, be specifically related to a kind of scientific research institution integrated evaluating method and system.
Background technology
Scientific research institution is the main body of university park, and scientific research institution chooses, and implements independent innovation strategy significant to country and place.For understanding the situation of each scientific research institution in time, be necessary to set up a set of evaluation of institutions system, realize the appraisal to scientific research institution, the fund making user limited and resource are fully used.
Traditional evaluation of institutions system generally adopts single index metadata to evaluate scientific research institution, as the scientific research institution for colleges and universities' type, the set of the total degree that the representative scientific paper sum delivered by it, scientific paper are cited, obtains the evaluation result of these colleges and universities.Traditional evaluation of institutions system being obtained evaluation result by single index metadata, the factor of consideration is comparatively single, rationally, reliably cannot evaluate scientific research institution.
Constantly perfect along with evaluation of institutions system, also there is the system realizing the evaluation to scientific research institution by arranging multiple index metadata, but existing evaluation system all adopts same index system, arrange same index metadata to evaluate different classes of scientific research institution, as for colleges and universities and this Liang Zhong scientific research institution of enterprise, adopt same research staff's index " the paper number delivered " as one of index metadata evaluated, this is concerning enterprise, if its evaluation result grade or rank etc., all obviously be unfair, cause evaluation result inaccurate, in addition, as index " enters the subject number of seniority among brothers and sisters ", because this index metadata may be used for evaluating colleges and universities, but can not be used for evaluating enterprise, if using this index metadata as a pair enterprise of index metadata evaluated with colleges and universities are unified evaluates, then evaluation result also can be caused inaccurate.
Summary of the invention
The invention provides a kind of scientific research institution integrated evaluating method and system, adopt same index system to evaluate different classes of scientific research institution to solve in prior art, cause the problem that evaluation result is unreliable, accuracy is low.
For this purpose, the present invention proposes following technical scheme.
On the one hand, the invention provides a kind of scientific research institution integrated evaluating method, comprising:
S1, gathers the attribute information of multiple scientific research institution, classifies to described multiple scientific research institution according to described attribute information;
S2, the classification belonging to scientific research institution, determines multiple index metadata of scientific research institution;
S3, according to described multiple index metadata, the index system that the classification of generation belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding;
S4, determines the target classification belonging to target scientific research institution that user inquires about;
S5, the target indicator system corresponding according to described target classification makes evaluation analysis to described target scientific research institution, draws evaluation result.
Preferably, described step S2 also comprises: the weight arranging each index metadata;
Now, described step S3 comprises:
According to the weight of described multiple index metadata and each index metadata, generate the index system that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.
Alternatively, described evaluation result is the scoring of described target scientific research institution, then described step S5 comprises:
According to the score of each target indicator metadata in described target indicator system with the corresponding each target indicator metadata of weight calculation, the score sum according to target indicator metadata all in described target indicator system obtains described scoring.
Alternatively, described evaluation result is the comment of described target scientific research institution, then described step S5 comprises:
Generate corresponding evaluation according to each target indicator metadata in described target indicator system, the weight corresponding according to each target indicator metadata arranges to generate described comment to each evaluation.
Preferably, when described target scientific research institution is multiple, described step S5 comprises:
According to the target classification belonging to each target scientific research institution, described multiple target scientific research institution is classified;
The index system corresponding according to Mei Lei scientific research institution carries out evaluation analysis to the scientific research institution of respective class respectively, and draws evaluation result respectively.
On the other hand, the present invention also provides a kind of scientific research institution overall evaluation system, comprising:
Gathering sort module, for gathering the attribute information of multiple scientific research institution, and according to described attribute information, described multiple scientific research institution being classified, and gather the target scientific research institution of user's inquiry, and determine the target classification belonging to described target scientific research institution;
Index metadata extraction module, for extracting index metadata corresponding to classification belonging to each scientific research institution;
Index system sets up module, for setting up index system corresponding to classification belonging to scientific research institution;
Evaluation of institutions module, comprises choosing index system submodule and evaluation analysis submodule; Described choosing index system submodule is used for the target classification according to described target scientific research institution, selects the target indicator system that described target classification is corresponding; Described evaluation analysis submodule is used for utilizing described target indicator system to carry out evaluation analysis to target scientific research institution, draws evaluation result.
Preferably, described scientific research institution overall evaluation system also comprises index metadata weight setting module, for arranging the weight of each index metadata; Now, described index system sets up module for the weight according to described multiple index metadata and each index metadata, sets up the index system that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.
Alternatively, described evaluation analysis submodule is used for the score according to each target indicator metadata in complex and the corresponding each target indicator metadata of weight calculation, is more finally marked according to the score sum of target indicator metadata all in described target indicator system.
Alternatively, described evaluation analysis submodule is used for generating corresponding evaluation according to each target indicator metadata in complex, then the weight corresponding according to each target indicator metadata arranges each evaluation, generates final comment.
Preferably, the multiple target scientific research institutions of described collection sort module also for inquiring about user, according to affiliated target classification, classify to described multiple target scientific research institution.
Beneficial effect of the present invention is:
Scientific research institution provided by the invention integrated evaluating method and system, for different classes of scientific research institution, adopt each self-corresponding index system to evaluate it, makes evaluation result more reasonable, improve reliability and the accuracy of evaluation result;
Owing to being all provided with multiple index metadata in each index system, make evaluation result more comprehensive;
By arranging weight to each index metadata in index system, the science of evaluation result, rationality can be improved;
When the scientific research institution of user's inquiry has multiple, by classifying to the plurality of scientific research institution, then evaluating respectively, drawing the evaluation result of classification, more accurate and intuitively, be convenient to user and analyse and compare for the evaluation of institutions in each classification.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Can understanding the features and advantages of the present invention clearly by reference to accompanying drawing, accompanying drawing is schematic and should not be construed as and carry out any restriction to the present invention, in the accompanying drawings:
Fig. 1 shows the process flow diagram of scientific research institution of the present invention integrated evaluating method;
Fig. 2 shows the schematic diagram of scientific research institution of the present invention overall evaluation system.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, embodiments of the present invention is described in detail.
Fig. 1 is the process flow diagram of scientific research institution provided by the invention integrated evaluating method, and as shown in Figure 1, this scientific research institution's integrated evaluating method comprises:
S1, gathers the attribute information of multiple scientific research institution, classifies to multiple scientific research institution according to attribute information;
S2, the classification belonging to scientific research institution, determines multiple index metadata of scientific research institution;
S3, according to multiple index metadata, the index system that the classification of generation belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding;
S4, determines the target classification belonging to target scientific research institution that user inquires about;
S5, the target indicator system corresponding according to described target classification makes evaluation analysis to described target scientific research institution, draws evaluation result.
In above-mentioned steps S1, attribute information comprises: the title, character, function etc. of scientific research institution.Following classification is included but not limited to: enterprise, colleges and universities and scientific research institutions after scientific research institution is classified.
In above-mentioned steps S2, due to the index metadata difference to some extent that the scientific research institution of each classification is corresponding, index metadata for evaluating colleges and universities is not necessarily applicable to evaluate enterprise, such as relevant to colleges and universities index metadata " enters the subject number of seniority among brothers and sisters ", be unsuitable for the scientific research institution for evaluating enterprise, and the index metadata relevant to enterprise " the season sales volume ", be unsuitable for the scientific research institution evaluating colleges and universities, therefore, need for the classification belonging to scientific research institution, determine the index metadata that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.Concrete data in index metadata can by gathering bibliographic data base, as acquisitions such as middle National IP Network, Wanfang Database in advance.
In above-mentioned steps S3, different classes of scientific research institution, corresponding index system is also different.As a kind of embodiment, the index system that the present invention is directed to for evaluating colleges and universities is described in detail.Specifically in table one.
Table one is for evaluating the index system of colleges and universities
In table one, the index system of colleges and universities is divided into three-decker, comprise: for first class index, two-level index and the three grades of indexs evaluated, wherein, first class index is total summary, two-level index is the refinement of first class index, and three grades of indexs are the further refinements to two-level index.
In order to improve science, the rationality of evaluation result, preferably, above-mentioned steps S2 also comprises: the weight arranging each index metadata, now, described step S3 comprises: according to the weight of described multiple index metadata and each index metadata, generates the index system that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.By arranging the weight of each index metadata, to distinguish the relative importance of each index metadata in overall evaluation process, rationality more scientific to the evaluation result of scientific research institution can be made.
According to the actual requirements, the evaluation result in above-mentioned steps S5 can be the concrete scoring of target scientific research institution, certainly, the mode of comment also can be adopted to represent evaluation result.
When the evaluation result in step S5 is for specifically marking, step S5 is specially: according to the score of each target indicator metadata in target indicator system with the corresponding each target indicator metadata of weight calculation, more finally marked according to the score sum of target indicator metadata all in target indicator system.
Such as Liang Suo University Scientific Research mechanism A and B, its index metadata comprises R&D units attribute, and corresponding weight is 10, scientific research personnel's quantity, and corresponding weight is 9, paper publishing number, and corresponding weight is 8.Marking mode can be, when These parameters metadata reaches certain standard, adds the score value identical with weight in scoring.
Such as R&D units attribute, if comprise provincial or ministerial level and above R&D units, so can judge to reach scoring criteria; For scientific research personnel's quantity, can judge to reach scoring criteria if comprise more than 50 people; For paper publishing number, if reach more than 100 sections, so can judge to reach scoring criteria.
For scientific research institution A, it comprises provincial or ministerial level and above R&D units, and scientific research personnel's quantity is 36 people, and paper publishing number is 110 sections; For research institution B, it comprises provincial or ministerial level and above R&D units, and researchist's quantity is 66 people, and paper publishing number is 77 sections.Thus can show that the scoring for scientific research institution A is 10+0+8=18, the scoring of scientific research institution B is 10+9+0=19.
Certainly except above-mentioned marking mode, also for index metadata concrete under an index metadata, weight can be set respectively, such as R&D units attribute, the weight of National Key Laboratory is 10, the weight of key lab of the Ministry of Education is 9, the weight of key lab of province is 8, thus can make more careful for scientific research institution and mark accurately.
When the evaluation result in step S5 is the comment of target scientific research institution, step S5 is specially: generate corresponding evaluation according to each target indicator metadata in target indicator system, the weight corresponding according to each target indicator metadata arranges to generate detailed comment to each evaluation.
Such as scientific research institution of enterprise comment is comprised: popularity, weight is 10, yearly turnover, weight is 9, company size, and weight is 8, so when making comment, can be placed on evaluating the paragraph of popularity, secondly placing the paragraph evaluating yearly turnover, again placing the paragraph evaluating company size.Be convenient to the comment that user sees weight maximum (most important) at first.
When the target scientific research institution of user's inquiry is multiple, evaluation result can represent one by one according to the putting in order of multiple target scientific research institutions of user's inquiry, certainly, as preferred mode, can also first classify according to its target classification to multiple target scientific research institutions of user's inquiry, concrete, above-mentioned steps S5 comprises:
According to the target classification belonging to each target scientific research institution, multiple target scientific research institutions of user's inquiry are classified;
The index system corresponding according to Mei Lei scientific research institution carries out evaluation analysis to the scientific research institution of respective class respectively, and draws evaluation result respectively.
By classification, can draw the evaluation result of classification, intuitive is strong, is convenient to users classification contrast.As having 12: three colleges and universities, four enterprises, five scientific research institutions when the scientific research institution of user's inquiry.Now, first these 12 scientific research institutions are classified, i.e. three colleges and universities, four enterprises, five scientific research institutions, respectively by colleges and universities' index system that colleges and universities are corresponding, evaluation analysis is carried out to these three colleges and universities again, the business indicators system corresponding by enterprise carries out evaluation analysis to these four enterprises, the scientific research institutions index system corresponding by scientific research institutions carries out evaluation analysis to these four scientific research institutions, finally, evaluation result presents in the mode of three forms, be respectively colleges and universities' evaluation result, valuation of enterprise result, scientific research institutions' evaluation result, intuitive is strong, and facilitate the evaluation result of user to the scientific research institution of three colleges and universities' equivalence classes that it is inquired about to contrast.
As shown in Figure 2, the present invention also provides a kind of scientific research institution overall evaluation system, comprising:
Gathering sort module, for gathering the attribute information of multiple scientific research institution, and according to attribute information, multiple scientific research institution being classified; And for gathering the target scientific research institution of user's inquiry, and determine the target classification belonging to target scientific research institution;
Index metadata extraction module, for extracting index metadata corresponding to classification belonging to each scientific research institution;
Index system sets up module, for setting up index system corresponding to classification belonging to scientific research institution;
Evaluation of institutions module, comprises choosing index system submodule and evaluation analysis submodule.Wherein, choosing index system submodule is used for the target classification according to target scientific research institution, the target indicator system that select target classification is corresponding; Evaluation analysis submodule is used for utilizing target indicator system to carry out evaluation analysis to target scientific research institution, draws evaluation result.
Preferably, scientific research institution's overall evaluation system also comprises index metadata weight setting module, for arranging the weight of each index metadata.Now, These parameters Establishing module is used for the weight according to multiple index metadata and each index metadata, sets up the index system that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.
Alternatively, when evaluation result is concrete score, evaluation analysis submodule is used for the score according to each target indicator metadata in complex and the corresponding each target indicator metadata of weight calculation, is more finally marked according to the score sum of target indicator metadata all in target indicator system.
Alternatively, when evaluation result is comment, evaluation analysis submodule is used for generating corresponding evaluation according to each target indicator metadata in complex, then the weight corresponding according to each target indicator metadata arranges each evaluation, generates final comment.
When the scientific research institution of user's inquiry has multiple, preferably, gathering the multiple target scientific research institutions of sort module also for inquiring about user, according to affiliated target classification, multiple target scientific research institution being classified.
Although describe embodiments of the present invention by reference to the accompanying drawings, but those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, such amendment and modification all fall into by within claims limited range.
Claims (10)
1. scientific research institution's integrated evaluating method, is characterized in that, comprising:
S1, gathers the attribute information of multiple scientific research institution, classifies to described multiple scientific research institution according to described attribute information;
S2, the classification belonging to scientific research institution, determines multiple index metadata of scientific research institution;
S3, according to described multiple index metadata, the index system that the classification of generation belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding;
S4, determines the target classification belonging to target scientific research institution that user inquires about;
S5, the target indicator system corresponding according to described target classification makes evaluation analysis to described target scientific research institution, draws evaluation result.
2. scientific research institution according to claim 1 integrated evaluating method, is characterized in that, described step S2 also comprises:
The weight of each index metadata is set,
Described step S3 comprises:
According to the weight of described multiple index metadata and each index metadata, generate the index system that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.
3. scientific research institution according to claim 2 integrated evaluating method, is characterized in that, described evaluation result is the scoring of described target scientific research institution,
Then described step S5 comprises:
According to the score of each target indicator metadata in described target indicator system with the corresponding each target indicator metadata of weight calculation, the score sum according to target indicator metadata all in described target indicator system obtains described scoring.
4. scientific research institution according to claim 2 integrated evaluating method, is characterized in that, described evaluation result is the comment of described target scientific research institution,
Then described step S5 comprises:
Generate corresponding evaluation according to each target indicator metadata in described target indicator system, the weight corresponding according to each target indicator metadata arranges to generate described comment to each evaluation.
5. scientific research institution according to any one of claim 1 to 4 integrated evaluating method, is characterized in that, when described target scientific research institution is multiple, described step S5 comprises:
According to the target classification belonging to each target scientific research institution, described multiple target scientific research institution is classified;
The index system corresponding according to Mei Lei scientific research institution carries out evaluation analysis to the scientific research institution of respective class respectively, and draws evaluation result respectively.
6. scientific research institution's overall evaluation system, is characterized in that, comprising:
Gathering sort module, for gathering the attribute information of multiple scientific research institution, and according to described attribute information, described multiple scientific research institution being classified, and gather the target scientific research institution of user's inquiry, and determine the target classification belonging to described target scientific research institution;
Index metadata extraction module, for extracting index metadata corresponding to classification belonging to each scientific research institution;
Index system sets up module, for setting up index system corresponding to classification belonging to scientific research institution;
Evaluation of institutions module, comprises choosing index system submodule and evaluation analysis submodule; Described choosing index system submodule is used for the target classification according to described target scientific research institution, selects the target indicator system that described target classification is corresponding; Described evaluation analysis submodule is used for utilizing described target indicator system to carry out evaluation analysis to target scientific research institution, draws evaluation result.
7. scientific research institution according to claim 6 overall evaluation system, is characterized in that, also comprises index metadata weight setting module, for arranging the weight of each index metadata;
Described index system sets up module for the weight according to described multiple index metadata and each index metadata, sets up the index system that classification belonging to scientific research institution is corresponding.
8. scientific research institution according to claim 7 overall evaluation system, it is characterized in that, described evaluation analysis submodule is used for the score according to each target indicator metadata in complex and the corresponding each target indicator metadata of weight calculation, is more finally marked according to the score sum of target indicator metadata all in described target indicator system.
9. scientific research institution according to claim 7 overall evaluation system, it is characterized in that, described evaluation analysis submodule is used for generating corresponding evaluation according to each target indicator metadata in complex, weight corresponding according to each target indicator metadata again arranges each evaluation, generates final comment.
10. the scientific research institution's overall evaluation system according to any one of claim 6 to 9, it is characterized in that, the multiple target scientific research institutions of described collection sort module also for inquiring about user, according to affiliated target classification, classify to described multiple target scientific research institution.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510789785.XA CN105447633A (en) | 2015-11-17 | 2015-11-17 | Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510789785.XA CN105447633A (en) | 2015-11-17 | 2015-11-17 | Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105447633A true CN105447633A (en) | 2016-03-30 |
Family
ID=55557781
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510789785.XA Pending CN105447633A (en) | 2015-11-17 | 2015-11-17 | Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105447633A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106295962A (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2017-01-04 | 中国农业大学 | Personnel evaluation model generating method and device |
| CN107563119A (en) * | 2017-09-11 | 2018-01-09 | 合肥工业大学 | Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment |
| CN108629489A (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2018-10-09 | 科技部科技评估中心 | The computational methods of scientific research institution's technical research forward position index towards cutting edge technology |
| CN109299892A (en) * | 2018-08-22 | 2019-02-01 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | A kind of recommended method of logistics channel, storage medium and server |
| CN110210735A (en) * | 2019-05-21 | 2019-09-06 | 上海软科教育信息咨询有限公司 | Department's merit rating system, method, terminal and medium suitable for unit of running a school |
| CN111723119A (en) * | 2019-03-18 | 2020-09-29 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | Screening method and device and storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104268720A (en) * | 2014-10-17 | 2015-01-07 | 重庆市科学技术研究院 | Scientific-and-technological-talent job-title classification evaluation method |
| CN104599062A (en) * | 2015-01-13 | 2015-05-06 | 中国农业大学 | Classification based value evaluation method and system for agricultural scientific and technological achievements |
| CN104636426A (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2015-05-20 | 河海大学 | Multi-factor comprehensive quantitative analysis and sorting method for academic influences of scientific research institutions |
-
2015
- 2015-11-17 CN CN201510789785.XA patent/CN105447633A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104268720A (en) * | 2014-10-17 | 2015-01-07 | 重庆市科学技术研究院 | Scientific-and-technological-talent job-title classification evaluation method |
| CN104636426A (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2015-05-20 | 河海大学 | Multi-factor comprehensive quantitative analysis and sorting method for academic influences of scientific research institutions |
| CN104599062A (en) * | 2015-01-13 | 2015-05-06 | 中国农业大学 | Classification based value evaluation method and system for agricultural scientific and technological achievements |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 共青团上海市委员会: "《生态文明与当代青年 》", 31 January 2014 * |
| 尹中一: "《状元坊 高考总复习 语文》", 30 June 2006 * |
| 杨淇蘥 等: "基于模糊综合评价法的贵州省科研机构创新绩效评价指标体系", 《科技情报开发与经济》 * |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106295962A (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2017-01-04 | 中国农业大学 | Personnel evaluation model generating method and device |
| CN107563119A (en) * | 2017-09-11 | 2018-01-09 | 合肥工业大学 | Suitable for the QoS evaluating method and device of multidisciplinary minimally-invasive treatment |
| CN108629489A (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2018-10-09 | 科技部科技评估中心 | The computational methods of scientific research institution's technical research forward position index towards cutting edge technology |
| CN108629489B (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2022-08-02 | 科技部科技评估中心 | Calculation method for leading-edge index of technological research of leading-edge technology-oriented scientific research institution |
| CN109299892A (en) * | 2018-08-22 | 2019-02-01 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | A kind of recommended method of logistics channel, storage medium and server |
| CN111723119A (en) * | 2019-03-18 | 2020-09-29 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | Screening method and device and storage medium |
| CN110210735A (en) * | 2019-05-21 | 2019-09-06 | 上海软科教育信息咨询有限公司 | Department's merit rating system, method, terminal and medium suitable for unit of running a school |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105447633A (en) | Scientific research institution integration evaluation method and system thereof | |
| Huang | A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective. | |
| Lee | A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore | |
| CN108717676B (en) | Multi-data fusion-based job and live space evaluation method and system under different scales | |
| CN101299217B (en) | Method, apparatus and system for processing map information | |
| CN102163214B (en) | Numerical map generation device and method thereof | |
| CN102194006B (en) | Search system and method capable of gathering personalized features of group | |
| CN107203849B (en) | Regional talent supply quantitative analysis method based on big data | |
| Brennan et al. | Trends in personal belief exemption rates among alternative private schools: Waldorf, Montessori, and holistic kindergartens in California, 2000–2014 | |
| Yu et al. | An academic trend in STEM education from bibliometric and co-citation method | |
| Liu et al. | Research fronts and prevailing applications in data envelopment analysis | |
| Chang et al. | Mass communication research and the invisible college revisited: The changing landscape and emerging fronts in journalism-related studies | |
| Wei | Research on impact evaluation of open access journals | |
| Bruce Ho | Measuring dot com efficiency using a combined DEA and GRA approach | |
| CN107341199A (en) | A kind of recommendation method based on documentation ＆ info general model | |
| AU2010202901A1 (en) | A system, method and computer program for preparing data for analysis | |
| CN108009194A (en) | A kind of books method for pushing, electronic equipment, storage medium and device | |
| CN109636682A (en) | A kind of teaching resource auto-collection system | |
| Martin et al. | Extreme spatial variability in marine picoplankton and its consequences for interpreting Eulerian time-series | |
| Wojan et al. | Decomposing regional patenting rates: How the composition factor confounds the rate factor | |
| US8639695B1 (en) | System, method and computer program for analysing and visualising data | |
| CN106126943A (en) | The state of an illness acquisition method derived based on association symptom | |
| CN104142952A (en) | Method and device for showing reports | |
| Katsaliaki et al. | A profile of OR research and practice published in the Journal of the Operational Research Society | |
| Murad et al. | Institutionalization and internationalization of research on the applications of the geographical information systems in health planning |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160330 |