CN107180123B - A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method - Google Patents
A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107180123B CN107180123B CN201710232949.8A CN201710232949A CN107180123B CN 107180123 B CN107180123 B CN 107180123B CN 201710232949 A CN201710232949 A CN 201710232949A CN 107180123 B CN107180123 B CN 107180123B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- spherical shell
- yield strength
- bearing capacity
- defect
- kinds
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/06—Power analysis or power optimisation
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation methods: step 1: setting spherical shell relevant parameter, wherein the central diameter r of spherical shell, different-thickness value t, different yield strength σy；Step 2: influence of the research material yield strength to spherical shell bearing capacity；Influence by yield strength to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity is defined as anelastic attenuation factor kpAnd it solves；Step 3: the non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of perfect spherical shell is acquirednon: pnon=kppm‑t；Step 4: geometry initial imperfection is studied to the affecting laws of spherical shell buckling load, the influence by geometry initial imperfection to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity is defined as geometrical defect decay factor kimpAnd it solves；Step 5: spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity P is concludedrealEstimation formula: preal=kpkimppm‑t；Step 6: according to the related parameter values of practical shell, searching corresponding data, substitute into correlation formula, final to calculate required spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity Preal。
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation methods.
Background technique
Important component and buoyancy unit of the pneumatic shell as submersible, play ensure dive during internal unit just
Often the effect of work and personnel health's safety, weight account for the 1/4-1/2 of submersible gross weight.Existing pneumatic shell is mostly spherical junctions
Structure, the Accurate Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity, the performances such as safety and economy to submersible have great influence.
Diving system and submersible enter grade and provide the pre- of relevant spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity to specification (CCS2013) is built
Survey method.First, numerical value calculates predicted method, is calculated by the simulation of finite element software, introduce first-order modal defect and elastoplasticity
The ultimate load and Buckling modes of spherical shell can be predicted in material properties.
Second, 16 chapter of specification provides the prediction calculation formula of titanium alloy pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity:Its
In: rinFor spherical shell internal diameter, rmFor spherical shell central diameter, t is shell thickness, σyFor Tensile strength, δ is defect amplitudes, a, b, c,
D, j, f, g, h are constant coefficient；In the concept phase of pressure-resistance structure, for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of titanium alloy spherical shell.
And in the calculating of spherical shell Nonlinear Numerical, assert based on two kinds of defects simulation analysis methods by CCS2013；One is
Based on physical geometry initial imperfection analysis method；Physical geometry initial imperfection analysis method is that modeling process considers actual defect
Such as local pit defect of form, is expressed as the initial geometrical defect of structure, then directly carries out non linear finite element analysis.It is another
Kind is the geometry initial imperfection analysis method based on buckling mode.Geometry initial imperfection method based on buckling mode, is by nothing
The buckling mode that defect sturcture is obtained by buckling analysis is converted to initial geometrical defect, then carries out nonlinear finite element point
Analysis.
Finite element numerical, which calculates, passes through years of researches and summary, can be compared with Accurate Prediction spherical shell bearing capacity, but software meter
Various kinds model parameter need to be set when calculation and parameter error is affected to result；And lack grinding for the shell instability Mechanism of system
Study carefully and assert.Meanwhile the calculation formula of classification society's offer can only predict the bearing capacity of the titanium alloy spherical shell under specific condition,
And extensive utilization, this calculation formula are not suitable for the materials such as high strength steel but to high strength steel in pneumatic shell.And in formula
The tensile strength for having related only to material does not account for the instability Mechanism of pressure-resistance structure, is not involved with material in formula
Relevant parameter, such as yield strength E, elasticity modulus μ and yield strength σy, and spherical shell Buckling modes often have with yield strength closely
Relationship.
Therefore, the prediction technique of spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity lack it is a kind of be suitable for high strength steel, more system and use model
Enclose wider array of prediction technique.
Summary of the invention
The technical problems to be solved by the present invention are: it is resistance to provide a kind of accurate high strength steel submersible of estimate of capacity of carring
Pressure ball shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a kind of resistance to pressure ball of high strength steel submersible
Shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method:
Step 1: setting spherical shell relevant parameter, wherein the central diameter r of spherical shell is set as 1000mm, and thickness value t range is from 25mm
It to 80mm, is carried out with 5mm incremental, chooses totally 12 kinds of thickness；Yield strength σyTake 1600MPa, 1700MPa, 1800MPa,
1900MPa, 2000MPa, 2100MPa, 2200MPa, 2300MPa totally 8 kinds of yield strengths；
Step 2: influence of the research material yield strength to spherical shell bearing capacity；By yield strength to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity
Influence be defined as the anelastic attenuation factor, solve anelastic attenuation factor kp:
A. the linear buckling load p of the perfect spherical shell of 12 kinds of thickness is calculatedm-t, calculation formula are as follows:Wherein the elastic modulus E of material is 200GPa, and Poisson's ratio μ is 0.3；
B. material model is set as ideal elastoplastic model, and grid cell type is the shell unit of complete integral；Spherical shell mould
The boundary condition of type is configured according to CCS2013；To 12 kinds of different radius-thickness ratios, 8 kinds of different yield strength σyUnder totally 96 moulds
Type passes through finite element software respectively, carries out analysis using non-linear arc regular way and obtains corresponding buckling load value；
C. the influence by yield strength to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity is defined as anelastic attenuation factor kp, calculate above-mentioned 96 moulds
The anelastic attenuation factor k of typepValue, anelastic attenuation factor kpValue is several for the perfection of buckling load value and respective thickness that upper step obtains
The calculation formula solution P of He Zhonghou shellm-tRatio；
D. according to the anelastic attenuation factor k of above-mentioned 96 modelspValue, draws different yield strength σyThe lower anelastic attenuation factor
kpWith the graph of relation of thick diameter t/r；
E. it is carried out by the graph of relation to anelastic attenuation factor kp under different yield strength σ y and thick diameter t/r non-linear
And linear regression analysis, fit same yield strength σySingle curve on anelastic attenuation factor kpFormulaFurther fit coefficient k under integral yield intensity0Formula: k0=8.92 × 10-6σy；
Step 3: the perfect non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of spherical shellnonPass through anelastic attenuation factor kpWith the calculating of middle thick shell
Formula Solution Pm-tProduct obtain: pnon=kppm-t；
Step 4: geometry initial imperfection is studied to the affecting laws of spherical shell buckling load, by geometry initial imperfection to spherical shell
The influence of ultimate bearing capacity is defined as geometrical defect decay factor kimp, solve geometrical defect decay factor kimp:
A. first-order modal defect is introduced as initial imperfection, ratio delta/r of initial imperfection amplitude and spherical shell central diameter, due to
Ratio delta/r of initial imperfection amplitude and spherical shell central diameter takes 0.002,0.004,0.006,0.008 and no more than 0.01, δ/r
0.01 totally 5 numerical value；8 kinds of different yield strength σ are calculated by finite element analysis softwarey, 12 kinds of different radius-thickness ratios, 5 kinds not
With totally 480 kinds of buckling load values under ratio delta/r of initial imperfection amplitude and spherical shell central diameter；
First-order modal defect is most dangerous defective form, when considering that the spherical shell bearing capacity prediction of mode defect calculates, institute
It is the most conservative to obtain result；So initial geometrical defect is set as mode defect.By the Linear buckling analysis of finite element software, obtain
Spherical shell instability forms are mode defect.
B. above-mentioned buckling load value and the non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of corresponding perfect spherical shell are calculatednonRatio obtain
480 geometrical defect decay factor kimpNumerical value；
C. based on different defect amplitudes δ and yield strength σy, geometrical defect decay factor k is drawn respectivelyimpFrom different thick diameters
Graph of relation than t/r；
D. the geometrical defect decay factor kimp as obtained by linearity and non-linearity regression analysis previous step and different thick diameters
Graph of relation than t/r obtains computation model:
Wherein,WithFor the coefficient in piecewise function.These
Coefficient is determined by the yield strength E and defect amplitudes of material and ratio delta/r of spherical shell central diameter.
E. coefficient is obtained using graphing methodWithAnalog value, graphing method figure used is respectively difference
Yield strength σyUnder, coefficientWithAs ratio delta/r of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter is at non-linear change
The graph of relation of change；Coefficient is obtained using graphing methodWithAnalog value, graphing method figure difference used
For different yield strength σyUnder, coefficientWithAs ratio delta/r of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter is at line
Property variation graph of relation；
F. wherein, coefficientWithAs the ratio delta/r and surrender of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter are strong
Spend σyThe linear variation of increase, as in linear regression analysis step obtained by graph of relation fit corresponding formula:
Step 5: in conjunction with the above analytical calculation, spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity P is concludedrealEstimation formula: preal=
kpkimppm-t；
Step 6: according to correlation radius value r, thickness value t, the yield strength σ of practical shelly, defect amplitudes δ, search phase
It answers data, substitute into correlation formula, it is final to calculate required spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity Preal。
The beneficial effects of the present invention are: this evaluation method is based on submersible pressurized spherical shell instability Mechanism, (i.e. shell loses for the first time
Line of material elastic stage is surely betided, spherical shell unstability and material yield strength have substantial connection), detailed consideration geometric parameter
The influence of (including spherical shell radius, wall thickness and defect amplitude) and material parameter (including elasticity modulus, Poisson's ratio and yield strength),
It is applied widely to keep the spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity numerical value estimated accurate.
The prediction technique of pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity of the invention is suitable for high strength steel material, and high strength steel material is wide
General applies to pressure-resistance structure, and the spherical shell predictor formula of such material is not directed in CCS2013.
Derivation process of the invention can be used for summarizing the pressurized spherical shell bearing capacity estimation of different materials.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is based on different yield strength σyUnder, anelastic attenuation factor kpWith the relationship of radius-thickness ratio t/r；
Fig. 2 is different defect amplitudes and yield strength σyUnder, geometrical defect decay factor kimpWith the relationship of radius-thickness ratio t/r；
(a is the situation that yield strength is 1600MPa in figure；B is the situation that yield strength is 1700MPa；C is that yield strength is
The situation of 1800MPa；D is the situation that yield strength is 1900MPa；E is the situation that yield strength is 2000MPa；F is that surrender is strong
Degree is the situation of 2100MPa；G is the situation that yield strength is 2200MPa；H is the situation that yield strength is 2300MPa)；
Fig. 3 is different yield strength σyUnder, coefficientAndWith lack
Fall into ratio delta/r relationship of amplitude and spherical shell central diameter.
Specific embodiment
With reference to the accompanying drawing, detailed description of the present invention specific embodiment.
A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method:
Step 1: setting spherical shell relevant parameter, wherein the central diameter r of spherical shell is set as 1000mm, and thickness value t range is from 25mm
It to 80mm, is carried out with 5mm incremental, chooses totally 12 kinds of thickness；Yield strength σyTake 1600MPa, 1700MPa, 1800MPa,
1900MPa, 2000MPa, 2100MPa, 2200MPa, 2300MPa totally 8 kinds of yield strengths；
Step 2: influence of the research material yield strength to spherical shell bearing capacity；By yield strength to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity
Influence be defined as the anelastic attenuation factor, solve anelastic attenuation factor kp:
A. the linear buckling load p of the perfect spherical shell of 12 kinds of thickness is calculatedm-t, calculation formula are as follows:Wherein the elastic modulus E of material is 200GPa, and Poisson's ratio μ is 0.3；
B. material model is set as ideal elastoplastic model, and grid cell type is the shell unit of complete integral；Spherical shell mould
The boundary condition of type is configured according to CCS2013；To 12 kinds of different radius-thickness ratios, 8 kinds of different yield strength σyUnder totally 96 moulds
Type passes through finite element software respectively, carries out analysis using non-linear arc regular way and obtains corresponding buckling load value；
C. the influence by yield strength to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity is defined as anelastic attenuation factor kp, calculate above-mentioned 96 moulds
The anelastic attenuation factor k of typepValue, anelastic attenuation factor kpValue is several for the perfection of buckling load value and respective thickness that upper step obtains
The calculation formula solution P of He Zhonghou shellm-tRatio；
D. according to the anelastic attenuation factor k of above-mentioned 96 modelspValue, draws different yield strength σyThe lower anelastic attenuation factor
kpWith the graph of relation of thick diameter t/r, as shown in Figure 1；
E. it is carried out by the graph of relation to anelastic attenuation factor kp under different yield strength σ y and thick diameter t/r non-linear
And linear regression analysis, fit same yield strength σySingle curve on anelastic attenuation factor kpFormulaFurther fit coefficient k under integral yield intensity0Formula: k0=8.92 × 10-6σy；
Step 3: the perfect non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of spherical shellnonPass through anelastic attenuation factor kpWith the calculating of middle thick shell
Formula Solution Pm-tProduct obtain: pnon=kppm-t；
Step 4: geometry initial imperfection is studied to the affecting laws of spherical shell buckling load, by geometry initial imperfection to spherical shell
The influence of ultimate bearing capacity is defined as geometrical defect decay factor kimp, solve geometrical defect decay factor kimp:
A. first-order modal defect, which is introduced, as initial imperfection, initial imperfection amplitude and ratio delta/r of spherical shell central diameter takes 5
Kind, respectively 0.002,0.004,0.006,0.008 and 0.01；8 kinds of different yield strength σ are calculated by analyzing softwarey、12
Totally 480 kinds of buckling load values under ratio delta/r of kind different radius-thickness ratios, 5 kinds of different initial imperfection amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter；
B. above-mentioned buckling load value and the non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of corresponding perfect spherical shell are calculatednonRatio obtain
480 geometrical defect decay factor kimpNumerical value；
C. based on different defect amplitudes δ and yield strength σy, geometrical defect decay factor k is drawn respectivelyimpFrom different thick diameters
Graph of relation than t/r, as shown in Figure 2；
D. as it can be seen that in a kind of yield strength σ in Fig. 2yIn the case where defect amplitudes δ, geometrical defect decay factor kimpWith
The relationship of radius-thickness ratio t/r can approximation be divided into 3 sections of linearity ranges.First segment in (0.025 < t/r < 0.045) range, both sides relation at compared with
The linear relationship of high slope, for second segment in (0.045 < t/r < 0.055) range, both sides relation tends to be horizontal；Third section exists
(0.055 < t/r < 0.080) range, the relationship of the two is at the linear relationship of low slope, therefore this 3 sections of linear relations can be summarized as
Piecewise function.By the graph of relation in linearity and non-linearity regression analysis Fig. 2, computation model is obtained:
Wherein,WithFor the coefficient in piecewise function.These
Coefficient is determined by the yield strength E and defect amplitudes of material and ratio delta/r of spherical shell central diameter.
E. coefficient is obtained using graphing methodWithAnalog value, graphing method figure used is respectively not
With yield strength σyUnder, coefficientWithAs ratio delta/r of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter is at non-linear
The graph of relation of variation, as shown in Figure 3；Coefficient is obtained using graphing methodWithAnalog value, make
Figure method figure used is respectively different yield strength σyUnder, coefficientWithWith in defect amplitudes and spherical shell
The graph of relation of the linear variation of ratio delta/r of diameter, as shown in Figure 3；
F. wherein, coefficientWithAs the ratio delta/r and surrender of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter are strong
Spend σyThe linear variation of increase, as in linear regression analysis step obtained by graph of relation fit corresponding formula:
Step 5: in conjunction with the above analytical calculation, spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity P is concludedrealEstimation formula: preal=
kpkimppm-t；
Step 6: according to correlation radius value r, thickness value t, the yield strength σ of practical shelly, defect amplitudes δ etc., search
Corresponding data substitutes into correlation formula, final to calculate required spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity Preal。
Thickness value is not limited to numerical value described in step 1, can disperse to bend using several different numerical value in usual range
It taking intensity and is not limited to numerical value described in step 1, yield strength can disperse to use several different numerical value in respective range, from
And to carry out seeking for estimation formula.
The spherical shell of unlike material is since the elastic modulus E of material, Poisson's ratio are different, the separate equations relevant parameter fitted
Value will be different, but still the step of being referred to this evaluation method obtains final mathematical estimation model.
The step of this evaluation method can also be used in the spherical shell of different central diameters obtains final mathematical estimation model.
The principles and effects of the invention, and the implementation that part uses only is illustrated in the above embodiments
Example, and is not intended to limit the present invention；It should be pointed out that for those of ordinary skill in the art, not departing from wound of the present invention
Under the premise of making design, various modifications and improvements can be made, and these are all within the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method, the steps include:
Step 1: setting spherical shell relevant parameter, wherein the central diameter r of spherical shell is set as 1000mm, thickness value t range from 25mm to
80mm, is carried out incremental with 5mm, chooses totally 12 kinds of thickness；Yield strength σyTake 1600MPa, 1700MPa, 1800MPa,
1900MPa, 2000MPa, 2100MPa, 2200MPa, 2300MPa totally 8 kinds of yield strengths；
Step 2: influence of the research material yield strength to spherical shell bearing capacity；By yield strength to the shadow of spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity
It rings and is defined as the anelastic attenuation factor, solve anelastic attenuation factor kp:
A. the linear buckling load p of the perfect spherical shell of 12 kinds of thickness is calculatedm-t, calculation formula are as follows:Wherein the elastic modulus E of material is 200GPa, and Poisson's ratio μ is 0.3；
B. material model is set as ideal elastoplastic model, and grid cell type is the shell unit of complete integral；Spherical Shell Model
Boundary condition is configured according to CCS2013；To 12 kinds of different radius-thickness ratios, 8 kinds of different yield strength σyUnder totally 96 models point
Not Tong Guo finite element software, using non-linear arc regular way carry out analysis obtaining corresponding buckling load value；
C. the influence by yield strength to spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity is defined as anelastic attenuation factor kp, calculate above-mentioned 96 models
Anelastic attenuation factor kpValue, anelastic attenuation factor kpValue is in the perfect geometry of buckling load value and respective thickness that upper step obtains
The calculation formula solution P of thick shellm-tRatio；
D. according to the anelastic attenuation factor k of above-mentioned 96 modelspValue, draws different yield strength σyLower anelastic attenuation factor kpWith
The graph of relation of radius-thickness ratio t/r；
E. by the graph of relation to anelastic attenuation factor kp under different yield strength σ y and radius-thickness ratio t/r carry out it is non-linear and
Linear regression analysis fits same yield strength σySingle curve on anelastic attenuation factor kpFormulaFurther fit coefficient k under integral yield intensity0Formula: k0=8.92 × 10-6σy；
Step 3: the perfect non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of spherical shellnonPass through anelastic attenuation factor kpWith the calculation formula solution of middle thick shell
Pm-tProduct obtain: pnon=kppm-t；
Step 4: geometry initial imperfection is studied to the affecting laws of spherical shell buckling load, by geometry initial imperfection to the spherical shell limit
The influence of bearing capacity is defined as geometrical defect decay factor kimp, solve geometrical defect decay factor kimp:
A. first-order modal defect, which is introduced, as initial imperfection, initial imperfection amplitude and ratio delta/r of spherical shell central diameter takes 5 kinds, point
It Wei 0.002,0.004,0.006,0.008 and 0.01；8 kinds of different yield strength σ are calculated by finite element analysis softwarey、
Totally 480 kinds of buckling load values under ratio delta/r of 12 kinds of different radius-thickness ratios, 5 kinds of different initial imperfection amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter；
B. above-mentioned buckling load value and the non-linear Critical Buckling Load P of corresponding perfect spherical shell are calculatednonRatio obtain 480
Geometrical defect decay factor kimpNumerical value；
C. based on different defect amplitudes δ and yield strength σy, geometrical defect decay factor k is drawn respectivelyimpFrom different radius-thickness ratio t/r
Graph of relation；
D. the geometrical defect decay factor kimp as obtained by linearity and non-linearity regression analysis previous step and different radius-thickness ratio t/r
Graph of relation obtain computation model:
Wherein,WithFor the coefficient in piecewise function；These coefficients
It is determined by the yield strength E and defect amplitudes of material and ratio delta/r of spherical shell central diameter；
E. coefficient is obtained using graphing methodWithAnalog value, graphing method figure used is respectively different surrenders
Intensity σyUnder, coefficientWithAs ratio delta/r of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter is at nonlinear change
Graph of relation；Coefficient is obtained using graphing methodWithAnalog value, graphing method figure used is respectively not
With yield strength σyUnder, coefficientWithWith the linear change of ratio delta/r of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diameter
The graph of relation of change；
F. wherein, coefficientWithWith the ratio delta/r and yield strength σ of defect amplitudes and spherical shell central diametery's
Increase linear variation, the graph of relation as obtained by step in linear regression analysis fits corresponding formula:
Step 5: in conjunction with the above analytical calculation, spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity P is concludedrealEstimation formula: preal=kpkimppm-t；
Step 6: according to correlation radius value r, thickness value t, the yield strength σ of practical shelly, defect amplitudes δ, search respective counts
According to, substitute into correlation formula, it is final calculate needed for spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity Preal。
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710232949.8A CN107180123B (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2017-04-11 | A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710232949.8A CN107180123B (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2017-04-11 | A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107180123A CN107180123A (en) | 2017-09-19 |
| CN107180123B true CN107180123B (en) | 2019-06-21 |
Family
ID=59830884
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710232949.8A Active CN107180123B (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2017-04-11 | A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107180123B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108920797A (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2018-11-30 | 江苏科技大学 | A kind of evaluation method of hemispherical pressure resistance end socket ultimate bearing capacity |
| CN111737902B (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2023-02-14 | 大连理工大学 | Numerical vibration method for rapidly solving buckling load of defect-containing thin-shell structure |
| CN112307660A (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2021-02-02 | 江苏科技大学 | Method for calculating modulus-free bulging numerical value of cylindrical shell of submersible |
| CN114104187B (en) * | 2021-11-29 | 2023-11-21 | 江苏科技大学 | Thickening seal head and design method thereof |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105158077A (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2015-12-16 | 江苏科技大学 | Water pressure environment simulation test device |
| CN105947153A (en) * | 2016-05-10 | 2016-09-21 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | Layered pressure regulating submersible and manufacturing method thereof |
-
2017
- 2017-04-11 CN CN201710232949.8A patent/CN107180123B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105158077A (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2015-12-16 | 江苏科技大学 | Water pressure environment simulation test device |
| CN105947153A (en) * | 2016-05-10 | 2016-09-21 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | Layered pressure regulating submersible and manufacturing method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| Buckling of spherical shells subjected to external pressure A comparison of experimental and theoretical data;Zhang Jian等;《Thin-Walled Structures》;20170228;第111卷;第58-64页 |
| 大深度载人潜水器极限承载能力非线性有限元分析方法研究;蒲映超等;《船舶工程》;20141231;第36卷(第3期);全文 |
| 深海载人潜水器耐压球壳极限强度研究;陆蓓等;《船舶力学》;20040229;第8卷(第1期);全文 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN107180123A (en) | 2017-09-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107180123B (en) | A kind of high strength steel submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method | |
| Rege et al. | A one-parameter nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation model | |
| Wang et al. | Effect of constraint induced by crack depth on creep crack-tip stress field in CT specimens | |
| Zhang et al. | Elastic–plastic fracture analyses for pipeline girth welds with 3D semi-elliptical surface cracks subjected to large plastic bending | |
| CN109684753A (en) | A kind of bending pipes springback angle backward-predicted and compensation method | |
| CN105243193B (en) | A kind of method for determining creep test prism test specimen compression strength conversion factor | |
| CN103454140B (en) | Simple method for measuring fatigue crack propagation threshold value of metal material | |
| CN110378011A (en) | A kind of metal bellows hydraulic bulging process robust design method | |
| CN205280750U (en) | Different silt content velocity of water flow survey devices of self -recording formula | |
| CN104655505B (en) | Instrumented-ball-pressing-technology-based residual stress detection method | |
| CN102128694A (en) | Method for testing tension and rigidity of short derrick boom of arch bridge | |
| Zhang et al. | Buckling of longan-shaped shells under external pressure | |
| CN107066728B (en) | A kind of titanium alloy submersible pressurized spherical shell ultimate bearing capacity evaluation method | |
| CN104019790A (en) | Measurement device and method for long-time-accumulation deformation of underwater pressure-resistant structure | |
| CN108844824A (en) | A kind of known materials residual stress analysis method based on conical pressure head | |
| CN110110406B (en) | Slope stability prediction method for achieving LS-SVM model based on Excel computing platform | |
| Scales et al. | Accurate estimation of yield strength and ultimate tensile strength through instrumented indentation testing and chemical composition testing | |
| CN105653808A (en) | Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo | |
| CN110942208B (en) | Method for determining optimal production conditions of silicon carbide foam ceramic | |
| KR900700880A (en) | Calculation method of biaxial stress of ferromagnetic material | |
| CN109443456B (en) | Flow measuring method and device | |
| Nicak et al. | STYLE: Study on transferability of fracture material properties from small scale specimens to a real component | |
| CN108920797A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of hemispherical pressure resistance end socket ultimate bearing capacity | |
| Chekhov et al. | Stress concentration in a transversely isotropic spherical shell with two circular rigid inclusions | |
| Pereira et al. | Cyclic and fatigue behavior of the P355NL1 steel under block loading |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |