CN105653808A - Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo - Google Patents

Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105653808A
CN105653808A CN201610003911.9A CN201610003911A CN105653808A CN 105653808 A CN105653808 A CN 105653808A CN 201610003911 A CN201610003911 A CN 201610003911A CN 105653808 A CN105653808 A CN 105653808A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
probability distribution
coordinates
extension
probability
power
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201610003911.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
廖健
肖前荣
唐小红
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CHENGDU SUNSHINE ALUMINIUM CO LTD
Original Assignee
CHENGDU SUNSHINE ALUMINIUM CO LTD
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CHENGDU SUNSHINE ALUMINIUM CO LTD filed Critical CHENGDU SUNSHINE ALUMINIUM CO LTD
Priority to CN201610003911.9A priority Critical patent/CN105653808A/en
Publication of CN105653808A publication Critical patent/CN105653808A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation

Abstract

The invention discloses a specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo. The method comprises the following steps that 1, coordinates (FP0.2, deltaLp0.2) of a point where the specified plasticity extends by 0.2% are looked up on a force-extension curve chart, two points 0.1 Fp0.2 and 0.5 Fp0.2 are calculated, and a mathematical model of the specified plasticity extension strength Rp0.2 is built; 2, probability distribution and parameters of the direct input quantity are determined according to known information; 3, two pairs of coordinates are taken at the position, vertically close to the point 0.1 Fp0.2, on a force-extension curve, two pairs of coordinates are taken at the position, vertically close to the point 0.5 Fp0.2, on a force-extension curve, precise coordinates of 0.1 Fp0.2 and 0.5 Fp0.2are obtained through linear interpolation values, fitting is performed to obtain the slope factor K of an elastic deformation section, and repeated probability sampling interpolation fitting is performed to obtain probability distribution of the indirect input quantity K; 4, sampling is performed for M times according to the probability distribution PDF of the input quantity; 5, M model values of the Rp0.2 are calculated, and then an average value, a standard difference and an any probability inclusion interval are calculated. The method has the advantage that the defects existing when the non-proportional extension strength is evaluated through GUM are overcome.

Description

A kind of regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo
Technical field
The present invention relates to test and measuring field, particularly a kind of regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo.
Background technology
" uncertainty of measurement represents guide directive/guide GuidetotheExpressionofuncertaintyinMeasuremen " is various countries' unified criterions followed when representing measurement result, domestic metering specification JJF1059.1-2012 " evaluation of uncertainty in measurement and expression " is equal to the GUM method specified, makes China's metering, test that the expression of result is in line with international standards. JJF1059.2-2012 " evaluates uncertainty of measurement by Monte Carlo method " and is the refilling member of JJF1059.1GUM uncertainty evaluation, the adnexa 1 of IDT international standard ISO/IECGUIDE98-3:2008 (GUM): " with the distribution of Monte Carlo method probability of spreading ", the former inapplicable situation of GUM method can be used the distribution of MCM probability of spreading to carry out uncertainty evaluation and expression by this refilling member specified in more detail. When former GUM is suitable for, it is possible to be verified by MCM. MCM is particularly suited for three kinds of situations: 1, measurement model is substantially in non-linear; 2, the probability density function of input quantity is substantially asymmetric; 3, the probability density function of output deviates normal distribution or �� distribution, is especially apparent the occasion of asymmetric distribution.
The enforcement key step of MCM: (1) obtains the probability distribution of input quantity, the i.e. distribution pattern of input quantity and probability parameter; (2) founding mathematical models; (3) input component calculates substantial amounts of output by mathematical model; (4) obtaining the average of output, standard deviation, probability distribution is interval. The probability distribution of input quantity obtains to directly obtain and obtains with indirect calculation, and a part of input quantity is directly read (such as F by puller systemp0.2, �� L), a part of input quantity is to calculate to obtain (such as sectional area S), and a part of input quantity is that matching obtains (such as k), and this is that the uncertainty evaluation of MCM brings some difficulty.
Current Rp0.2The commonly used GUM method of uncertainty evaluation, partial uncertainty includes: puller system force value detection uncertainty, puller system calibration uncertainty, specimen size uncertainty of measurement, the original gauge length uncertainty of extensometer and note of extending extend uncertainty of measurement, result revision of the convention uncertainty and determine the uncertainty that slope baseline introduces. Problems existing is as follows: 1, GB/T228.1-2010 " metal material stretching test part 1: room temperature test method " uses 10 samples to obtain the measured value of each mechanical performance index, carry out GUM uncertainty evaluation, but often only have two samples during actual tests, need first to do uncertainty evaluation with 10 parallel samples, take relative standard uncertainty to convert, the uncertainty low precision of evaluation when measured value difference is bigger; 2, Wang Jun proposes under the premise of a sample detection in paper " metal material Proof strength of non-proportional measuring result uncertainty ", the slope k taking 100 coordinate points matching stretch sections on power-extension curve carries out the nonproportional cyclic straining evaluation of GUM method, the coordinate that reality takes 100 points on a power-extension curve is time-consuming, operability is not high, inapplicable for the metal material without obvious elastic vertical line segment, it is not suitable for the GB/T228.1 annex J method of successive approximation yet and measures the puller system Cleaning Principle specified in moulding extension strength; 3, Rp0.2Mathematical model be
R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, Rp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation intensity (Mpa) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; Fp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation load (N) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; S refers to that specimen cross section amasss (mm2); K refers to that power extends the slope of curve stretch section data linear fit; �� L refers to extend; LoRefer to extensometer gage length;
Mathematical model is non-linear, exports result Rp0.2Probability distribution be not normal distribution, it is possible to can cause that the uncertainty assessed does not meet reality. Based on above feature, MCM is more suitable for evaluation regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty.
There is following defect when evaluating regulation plastic elongation intensity in GUM: (1) needs multiple parallel sample, or needs to take during 100 coordinate points relatively difficult on power-extension curve; (2) Rp0.2Mathematical model non-linear, Rp0.2Probability distribution deviate from normal distribution, when measured value during for measured value with uncertainty evaluation differs bigger, the conversion of the relative uncertainty degree of use causes GUM evaluating precision poor; (3) GUM evaluation is time-consuming longer, is not suitable for each measured value and calculates the uncertainty of himself measured value. (4) slope obtains average and the standard deviation of k by taking 100 matchings on power-extension curve chart, inapplicable on the metal material without obvious elastic vertical line segment, takes a difficulty in such cases, and the slope baseline of matching is poor relative to actual standard can be bigger than normal; (5) determination of the slope baseline non-GB/T228.1 annex J method of successive approximation measures the puller system Cleaning Principle method specified in moulding extension strength. The GB/T228.1 annex J method of successive approximation is applicable to the mensuration with the regulation plastic elongation intensity without obvious elastic vertical line segment metal material. It is more difficult that GUM evaluates uncertainty. The defect of regulation plastic elongation intensity is evaluated for solving above GUM, this method measures with the GB/T228.1 annex J method of successive approximation and specifies that moulding extension strength is for basis, adopt MCM to carry out probability distribution to propagate and calculate uncertainty, use the Mathematica software programming MCM uncertainty evaluation program of WolframResearch company.
Summary of the invention
This invention address that GUM evaluates the defect of the existence of regulation plastic elongation intensity, and measure the moulding extension strength of regulation for basis with the GB/T228.1 annex J method of successive approximation, adopt MCM to carry out probability distribution and propagate calculating uncertainty, it is provided that a kind of regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo.
The purpose of the present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions: a kind of regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo, and it comprises the following steps:
S1, set up Rp0.2Mathematical model
R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, Rp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation intensity (Mpa) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; Fp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation load (N) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; S refers to that specimen cross section amasss (mm2); K refers to that power extends the slope of curve stretch section data linear fit; �� L refers to extend; LoRefer to extensometer gage length;
S2, the probability distribution determining the amount of directly inputting according to Given information and parameter
Used standard dynamometer grade to obtain puller system by electronic universal puller system grade and calibration puller system and measure force value probability distribution; The note grade of extending used by test obtains original gauge length is worth probability distribution with extending; Being obtained the probability distribution of dimensional measurements by the slide calliper rule used of measuring of specimen size, specimen cross section amasss S, for sheet coupon
S=La �� Lb----------------------------------------------(2)
Wherein La refers to specimen width (mm); Lb refers to sample thickness (mm);
S3, on a power-extension curve chart, check in (Fp0.2, �� Lp0.2), calculate 0.1Fp0.2��0.5Fp0.2, power-extension curve obtains respectively up and down near 0.1Fp0.2Two pairs of coordinates, up and down near 0.5Fp0.2Two pairs of coordinates, according to the probability distribution Sampling of coordinate figure, by method of least square linear interpolation calculate 0.1Fp0.20.1 �� Lp0.2, calculate 0.5F again by method of least square linear interpolationp0.20.5 �� Lp0.2, least-squares algorithm linear fitting [{ 0.1Fp0.2, 0.1 �� Lp0.2, { 0.5Fp0.2, 0.5 �� Lp0.2] slope that obtains is elastic deformation baseline k, by [{ 0.1Fp0.2, 0.1 �� Lp0.2, { 0.5Fp0.2, 0.5 �� Lp0.2] probability distribution sampling least square fitting go out a series of k, obtain probability distribution and the parameter of k;
S4, probability distribution PDF according to above-mentioned input quantity carry out �� sampling, for each sample vector, substitute into mathematical model
R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 3 )
Corresponding R is calculated with formula (3)p0.2Model value, and actual tests detection in due to power-extension curve be not desirable smoothed curve, k �� (�� L-0.002 �� Lo) average and the F that checks on power-extension curve chartp0.2There are differences, probability distribution conversion need to be carried out;
S5, �� R of sequencep0.2Model value, calculate its average, standard deviation, any probability packet is containing interval.
The invention have the advantages that (1), have only to a tensile sample, and meet power-extension curve chart elastic vertical line segment height and be not less than 0.5Fp0.2Metal material, thus it is limited and can not provide the accurate uncertainty situation of result to meet actual stretching detection sample, this method only need at the coordinate of power-5 points of extension curve acquisition, simple to operate it is greatly saved the uncertainty evaluation time, makes each result provide its accurate uncertainty to be possibly realized; (2), MCM is applicable to the nonlinear mathematical model of regulation plastic elongation intensity; (3), this method adopts the Mathematica software programming MCM uncertainty evaluation program of WolframResearch company, and associate excel file, it is thus achieved that 5 point coordinates only need out of order input excel file directly can show result of calculation at Mathematica software.Make whole evaluation process stability and high efficiency brief. (4), for actual tests detect in due to power-extension curve be not desirable smoothed curve, k �� (�� L-0.002 �� Lo) average and the F that checks on power-extension curve chartp0.2There are differences, carry out probability distribution conversion and make the uncertainty settled accounts more accurate; (5), this method can obtain uncertainty according to any confidence level (95%, 99% etc.).
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the computer program flow chart of probability sampling simulation;
Fig. 2 is the structural representation of 6063/T6 aluminum alloy plate materials;
Fig. 3 is the power after Fig. 2 drawn-extension curve chart;
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention is further described below, and protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the following stated:
A kind of regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo, it comprises the following steps:
S1, set up Rp0.2Mathematical model
R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, Rp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation intensity (Mpa) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; Fp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation load (N) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; S refers to that specimen cross section amasss (mm2); K refers to that power extends the slope of curve stretch section data linear fit; �� L refers to extend; LoRefer to extensometer gage length;
S2, the probability distribution determining the amount of directly inputting according to Given information and parameter
Used standard dynamometer grade to obtain puller system by electronic universal puller system grade and calibration puller system and measure force value probability distribution; The note grade of extending used by test obtains original gauge length is worth probability distribution with extending; Being obtained the probability distribution of dimensional measurements by the slide calliper rule used of measuring of specimen size, specimen cross section amasss S, for sheet coupon
S=La �� Lb------------------------------------------------(2)
Wherein La refers to specimen width (mm); Lb refers to sample thickness (mm);
S3, on a power-extension curve chart, check in (Fp0.2, �� Lp0.2), calculate 0.1Fp0.2��0.5Fp0.2, power-extension curve obtains respectively up and down near 0.1Fp0.2Two pairs of coordinates, up and down near 0.5Fp0.2Two pairs of coordinates, according to the probability distribution Sampling of coordinate figure, by method of least square linear interpolation calculate 0.1Fp0.20.1 �� Lp0.2, calculate 0.5F again by method of least square linear interpolationp0.20.5 �� Lp0.2, least-squares algorithm linear fitting [{ 0.1Fp0.2, 0.1 �� Lp0.2, { 0.5Fp0.2, 0.5 �� Lp0.2] slope that obtains is elastic deformation baseline k, by [{ 0.1Fp0.2, 0.1 �� Lp0.2, { 0.5Fp0.2, 0.5 �� Lp0.2] probability distribution sampling least square fitting go out a series of k, obtain probability distribution and the parameter of k;
S4, probability distribution PDF according to above-mentioned input quantity carry out �� sampling, for each sample vector, substitute into mathematical model
R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 3 )
Calculate corresponding Rp0.2Model value, and actual tests detection in due to power-extension curve be not desirable smoothed curve, k �� (�� L-0.002 �� Lo) average and the F that checks on power-extension curve chartp0.2There are differences, probability distribution conversion need to be carried out;
S5, �� R of sequencep0.2Model value, calculate its average, standard deviation, any probability packet is containing interval.
Embodiment one: with 6063/T6 aluminum alloy plate materials sample as in figure 2 it is shown, width La=12.5, thickness Lb=2.56, test platform is for thinking carefully safe prompt microcomputer controlled electronic universal tester, model: CMT5504, maximum pull 50KN, accuracy class 0.5 grade. Verifier calibration dynamometer grade used is 0.3 grade, takes k=2, and error is 0.3%/2. Electronic digital indicator (specification: 0��200mm), the error of indication �� 0.01mm.Extensometer gage length 50mm, gauge length relative error 0.5%, extensometer measures relative error 0.5%. Tensile strain rate is 0.00025/s.
Power-extension curve chart is obtained after being detected by 6063/T6 aluminum alloy plate materials sample drawn in Fig. 1, as it is shown on figure 3, F in Fig. 3p0.2Point coordinates 0.278,7958.268N}, up and down near 0.1Fp0.2(795.8268N) two point coordinates respectively [{ 0.0134625,793.755N}, { 0.013595,801.880N}]; Up and down near 0.5Fp0.2(3979.134N) two point coordinates respectively [{ 0.0836725,3945.255N}, { 0.0859975,4046.265N}].
2, the probability distribution of component is inputted
(1) universal tensile testing machine load distribution, puller system grade is 0.5 grade, and relative error �� 0.5% is set to be uniformly distributed, Fp0.2* U [1-0.5%, 1+0.5%];
(2) verifier calibration dynamometer grade used is 0.3 grade, takes k=2, and relative error is �� 0.3%/2, is set to be uniformly distributed, Fp0.2* U [1-0.15%/2,1+0.15%/2];
(3) the original gauge length 50mm of extensometer, gauge length relative error is 0.5%, is set to be uniformly distributed, L0* U [1-0.5%, 1+0.5%];
(4) extensometer measures relative error �� 0.5%, is set to be uniformly distributed, �� L*U [1-0.5%, 1+0.5%];
(5) original cross-sectional area S partial uncertainty has the error of indication �� 0.01 (set and be uniformly distributed) of slide gauge, and repetition measurement error (sets normal distribution). Width La=12.5+N [0,0.01]+U [-0.01,0.01], thickness: Lb=2.1+N [0,0.01]+U [-0.01,0.01];
(6) deterministic force-extension slope of curve k, Fp0.2Point coordinates 0.278,7958.268N}, up and down near 0.1Fp0.2(795.8268N) two point coordinates [{ 0.0134625,793.755N}, { 0.013595,801.880N}], up and down near 0.5Fp0.2(3979.134N) 2 points [{ 0.0836725,3945.255N}, { 0.0859975,4046.265N}].
, then the coordinate probability distribution of every is:
[��Li* U [1-0.5%, 1+0.5%], Fi* U [1-0.5%, 1+0.5%] * U [1-0.15%/2,1+0.15%/2]], use linear interpolation to obtain 0.1Fp0.2, 0.5Fp0.2Extend coordinate;
(7) according to 0.1Fp0.2, 0.5Fp0.2Coordinate linear least squares fit goes out slope baseline k, it is thus achieved that the probability distribution of k;
(8) according to above-mentioned Rp0.2Mathematical model, calculate Rp0.2Probability distribution, seek Rp0.2Average, standard deviation, the probability interval of 95%, the probability interval of 99%, Composite Seismogram.
Mathematica is used to realize following code:

Claims (1)

1. the regulation plastic elongation intensity uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo, it is characterised in that: it comprises the following steps:
S1, set up Rp0.2Mathematical model
R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, Rp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation intensity (Mpa) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; Fp0.2Refer to the plastic elongation load (N) that elongation percentage is 0.2%; S refers to that specimen cross section amasss (mm2); K refers to that power extends the slope of curve stretch section data linear fit; �� L refers to extend; LoRefer to extensometer gage length;
S2, the probability distribution determining the amount of directly inputting according to Given information and parameter
Used standard dynamometer grade to obtain puller system by electronic universal puller system grade and calibration puller system and measure force value probability distribution; The note grade of extending used by test obtains original gauge length is worth probability distribution with extending; Being obtained the probability distribution of dimensional measurements by the slide calliper rule used of measuring of specimen size, specimen cross section amasss S, for sheet coupon
S=La �� Lb------------------------------------------------(2)
Wherein La refers to specimen width (mm);Lb refers to sample thickness (mm);
S3, on a power-extension curve chart, check in (Fp0.2, �� Lp0.2), calculate 0.1Fp0.2��0.5Fp0.2, power-extension curve obtains respectively up and down near 0.1Fp0.2Two pairs of coordinates, up and down near 0.5Fp0.2Two pairs of coordinates, according to the probability distribution Sampling of coordinate figure, by method of least square linear interpolation calculate 0.1Fp0.20.1 �� Lp0.2, calculate 0.5F again by method of least square linear interpolationp0.20.5 �� Lp0.2, least-squares algorithm linear fitting [{ 0.1Fp0.2, 0.1 �� Lp0.2, { 0.5Fp0.2, 0.5 �� Lp0.2]] slope that obtains is elastic deformation baseline k, by [{ 0.1Fp0.2, 0.1 �� Lp0.2, { 0.5Fp0.2, 0.5 �� Lp0.2] probability distribution sampling least square fitting go out a series of k, obtain probability distribution and the parameter of k;
S4, probability distribution PDF according to above-mentioned input quantity carry out �� sampling, for each sample vector, substitute into mathematical model R p 0.2 = k × ( Δ L - 0.002 × L o ) S - - - ( 3 )
Corresponding R is calculated with formula (3)p0.2Model value, and actual tests detection in due to power-extension curve be not desirable smoothed curve, k �� (�� L-0.002 �� Lo) average and the F that checks on power-extension curve chartp0.2There are differences, probability distribution conversion need to be carried out;
S5, �� R of sequencep0.2Model value, calculate its average, standard deviation, any probability packet is containing interval.
CN201610003911.9A 2016-01-05 2016-01-05 Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo Pending CN105653808A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610003911.9A CN105653808A (en) 2016-01-05 2016-01-05 Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610003911.9A CN105653808A (en) 2016-01-05 2016-01-05 Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105653808A true CN105653808A (en) 2016-06-08

Family

ID=56490459

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610003911.9A Pending CN105653808A (en) 2016-01-05 2016-01-05 Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105653808A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108509754A (en) * 2018-05-15 2018-09-07 北京航空航天大学 A kind of high-density packages integrated circuit linkage silk touching methods of risk assessment
CN109063231A (en) * 2018-06-15 2018-12-21 中国核电工程有限公司 Based on the nucleic uncertainty of GUM directive/guide to critical system keffThe assessment method of influence
CN111751313A (en) * 2020-05-28 2020-10-09 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Method for evaluating measurement uncertainty of single-point calibration measurement system
CN113031514A (en) * 2021-03-18 2021-06-25 西南交通大学 R-test calibration uncertainty evaluation method based on metrology

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6178389B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 2001-01-23 Brown & Sharpe Dea Spa Method of determining the measuring uncertainty of a coordinate measuring device
US6549854B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2003-04-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Uncertainty constrained subsurface modeling
CN1912861A (en) * 2005-08-08 2007-02-14 上海市计量测试技术研究院 Method of analog computing synthesis indeterminacy using Monte carlo acounting
CN101509858A (en) * 2009-03-20 2009-08-19 北京航空航天大学 Uncertainty assessment method for measuring rockwell hardness of information lacking material
CN103049639A (en) * 2012-10-30 2013-04-17 中国电子科技集团公司第十三研究所 Noise parameter measurement uncertainty evaluation method based on multi-chip module (MCM)

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6178389B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 2001-01-23 Brown & Sharpe Dea Spa Method of determining the measuring uncertainty of a coordinate measuring device
US6549854B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2003-04-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Uncertainty constrained subsurface modeling
CN1912861A (en) * 2005-08-08 2007-02-14 上海市计量测试技术研究院 Method of analog computing synthesis indeterminacy using Monte carlo acounting
CN101509858A (en) * 2009-03-20 2009-08-19 北京航空航天大学 Uncertainty assessment method for measuring rockwell hardness of information lacking material
CN103049639A (en) * 2012-10-30 2013-04-17 中国电子科技集团公司第十三研究所 Noise parameter measurement uncertainty evaluation method based on multi-chip module (MCM)

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GB/T 228.1-2010: "《金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法》", 23 December 2010 *
姬中华 等: "基于蒙特卡洛法的铝合金抗拉强度测量不确定度评定", 《理化检验-物理分册》 *
王俊,王玉玲: "金属材料规定非比例延伸强度测量结果不确定度评定", 《理化检验-物理分册》 *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108509754A (en) * 2018-05-15 2018-09-07 北京航空航天大学 A kind of high-density packages integrated circuit linkage silk touching methods of risk assessment
CN108509754B (en) * 2018-05-15 2021-08-31 北京航空航天大学 High-density packaged integrated circuit bonding wire touch risk assessment method
CN109063231A (en) * 2018-06-15 2018-12-21 中国核电工程有限公司 Based on the nucleic uncertainty of GUM directive/guide to critical system keffThe assessment method of influence
CN111751313A (en) * 2020-05-28 2020-10-09 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Method for evaluating measurement uncertainty of single-point calibration measurement system
CN111751313B (en) * 2020-05-28 2023-03-07 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Method for evaluating measurement uncertainty of single-point calibration measurement system
CN113031514A (en) * 2021-03-18 2021-06-25 西南交通大学 R-test calibration uncertainty evaluation method based on metrology
CN113031514B (en) * 2021-03-18 2022-03-18 西南交通大学 R-test calibration uncertainty evaluation method based on metrology

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110411836B (en) Test and calculation method for measuring plastic strain ratio of metal material
CN105528288B (en) A kind of method for testing software and device
CN105653808A (en) Specified plasticity extension strength uncertainty evaluation method based on Monte Carlo
CN105043865A (en) Testing method for concrete damage fracture performance under double-field coupling
CN103454140B (en) Simple method for measuring fatigue crack propagation threshold value of metal material
CN103335589A (en) Calibration method for CWR (Continuous Welded Railway) temperature stress sensing node
CN102865952A (en) Nondestructive testing method for working stress of concrete
CN206710209U (en) The synchro measure experimental rig of reinforcement lateral deformation in stiffened panel axial compression test
CN104390932A (en) Method for detecting moisture content of wood on basis of infrared differential spectrum technology
CN109858112A (en) Numerical inversion analysis method based on structural stress monitoring result
CN115265724A (en) Liquid level meter field calibration device and method for obtaining calibration result
Kawabata et al. Investigation on η and m factors for J integral in SE (B) specimens
CN108548720B (en) Method for obtaining ductile material J resistance curve by I-type crack elastoplasticity theoretical formula
CN106018505A (en) Calibration method for concrete chlorine ion content meter
CN105352433A (en) Device and method for measuring surface crack depth and shape of hull typical welding structure
CN105068035A (en) Voltage transformer error level dynamic detection method and system
CN104165795A (en) Method for determining residual flexural capacity of historic building beams
CN103047939B (en) Fiber Bragg grating strain sensor engineering adaptability evaluation method
Parool et al. An η‐compliance method to estimate the J‐Δa curve for pipes with a circumferential surface crack
CN109446658A (en) A kind of determination method of titanium alloy taper impression constraint factor and representative strain
Kumar et al. Monte Carlo method for evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in brinell hardness scale
Dhoska et al. Measurement uncertainty for mechanical resistance of manufactured steel bar
CN104913989A (en) Method for measuring fracture toughness crack stable-state extended length
CN212646969U (en) Calibration device for dynamic response time characteristic of electric energy meter
CN111767664A (en) Method for determining plane strain fracture toughness of metal material based on energy release rate

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20160608