CN107169650A - It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed - Google Patents
It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107169650A CN107169650A CN201710329029.8A CN201710329029A CN107169650A CN 107169650 A CN107169650 A CN 107169650A CN 201710329029 A CN201710329029 A CN 201710329029A CN 107169650 A CN107169650 A CN 107169650A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- point
- bid
- enterprise
- leader
- sincere
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Abstract
The sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed is applied to the invention discloses a kind of, by scoring leader's moral integrity, enterprise's general mood is quantified, be conducive to carrying out enterprise just assessment directly perceived, and those in subordinate positions will follow the example set by their superiors, enterprise is assessed by leader, it is ensured that the reliability of assessment result；By scoring participant's moral integrity, construction professional ethics that can be indirectly to purpose unit is estimated.In the present invention, the sincere score value of bid object is calculated by enterprise's general mood, history engineering and history engineering participant moral integrity, be conducive to making effectively evaluating directly perceived to the sincere degree for the object that calls for bid, history engineering evaluation information is obtained especially by networking, it is even more overall using object of constructing as evaluating, while bid object sincerity degree is evaluated, its strength of constructing is also evaluated.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to bid technical field, more particularly to a kind of sincere toolization methods of marking for being applied to bid assessment.
Background technology
Bid is the dealing for a certain engineering construction or staple commodities, invite be ready to contract or merchandise manufacturer bid with from
The behavior of middle selection contractor or dealer.Program is generally：Bid person's advertisement-printing selectively invites relevant manufacturer, and
Bidding document is issued, or encloses drawing and sample；Bidder submits tender documents on request；Then under notarial hosting when
Many open sealed tenders, using comprehensive eligible person as highest bidder；Last both sides, which sign, to contract or trade contract.
But, at present, in the tender documents that tenderer provides, the authenticity of many information is difficult to assess, so, tenderer
In the case where not knowing tenderer's credibility, it is difficult to make correct judgement.
The content of the invention
The technical problem existed based on background technology, the present invention is proposed a kind of sincere toolization for being applied to bid assessment and commented
Divide method.
A kind of sincere toolization methods of marking for being applied to bid assessment proposed by the present invention, comprises the following steps：
S1, reception bid prospectus, and according to bid prospectus preliminary screening purpose unit；Then each purpose unit is obtained
Top layer leader, the intelligent history engineering contracted of selection purpose unit of parallel-connection network；
S2, networking obtain each leader and disclose deed and calculate leader's moral integrity point, then according to each leader's moral integrity point
Calculate enterprise's general mood point；
S3, each history engineering participant information of acquisition, search for the social mode of each participant, and the disclosure in social mode
The related words and phrases of engineering are captured in information, and participant's moral integrity point is calculated by semantic analysis；
S4, performed point according to each participant's moral integrity point calculating purpose unit, and calculated and anticipate according to the on-Line review of each history engineering
To the history engineering point of unit；
S5, enterprise's general mood point, history engineering point and unit are performed point substitute into a default sincere assessment models unit of account
Sincerity point.
Preferably, in step S1, purpose unit webpage can be obtained according to bid prospectus, then passes through purpose unit webpage
Obtain enterprise architecture；Or directly obtain enterprise architecture from bid prospectus；Then, top layer leader is obtained according to enterprise architecture
People.
Preferably, leader's moral integrity computation model and enterprise's general mood computation model are preset with step S2, according to leader
Moral integrity computation model and enterprise's general mood computation model calculate leader's moral integrity point and enterprise's general mood point respectively；
Leader's moral integrity computation model is：Moral integrity point=positive information bar number-negative report bar number；
Enterprise's general mood computation model is：Enterprise's general mood point=each leader's moral integrity is divided and/leader sum.
Preferably, in step S3, provided with positive semantic set, obtain semantic with front in crawl words and phrases by semantic analysis
The semantic front words and phrases quantity overlapped in set, then calculates according to the ratio of front words and phrases quantity and crawl words and phrases quantity and participates in
People's moral integrity point.
Preferably, in step S4, divide according to performing point computation model unit of account and performing, performing a point computation model is：
Unit execution point=participant's moral integrity is divided and/participant's quantity.
Preferably, in step S4, evaluated according to front in on-Line review and the ratio of unfavorable ratings calculates history engineering point.
Preferably, in step S5, sincere assessment models are：Unit sincerity point=(enterprise's general mood point+history engineering point × 3+
Unit execution point × 2)/6.
In the present invention, by scoring leader's moral integrity, enterprise's general mood is quantified, is conducive to directly perceived to enterprise's progress just
Assessment, and those in subordinate positions will follow the example set by their superiors, and enterprise is assessed by leader, it is ensured that the reliability of assessment result；By to participant's moral integrity
Scoring, construction professional ethics that can be indirectly to purpose unit is estimated.
In the present invention, the sincere of object of calling for bid is calculated by enterprise's general mood, history engineering and history engineering participant moral integrity
Believe score value, be conducive to making effectively evaluating directly perceived to the sincere degree for the object that calls for bid, history work is obtained especially by networking
Journey evaluation information, is even more overall using object of constructing as evaluating, while evaluation bid object sincere degree, it is also evaluated
Construction strength.
The present invention is by Enterprise Credit impression by the abstract tool that turns to as providing valuable reference number for the progress of bidding work
According to for smoothly laying a good foundation for bid workpiece.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is a kind of sincere toolization methods of marking flow chart for being applied to bid assessment proposed by the present invention.
Embodiment
Reference picture 1, a kind of sincere toolization methods of marking for being applied to bid assessment proposed by the present invention, including following step
Suddenly.
S1, reception bid prospectus, and according to bid prospectus preliminary screening purpose unit.Then each purpose unit is obtained
Top layer leader, the intelligent history engineering contracted of selection purpose unit of parallel-connection network.
In this step, purpose unit webpage can be obtained according to bid prospectus, then be obtained and looked forward to by purpose unit webpage
Industry framework.Or directly obtain enterprise architecture from bid prospectus.Then, top layer leader is obtained according to enterprise architecture.
In this step, top layer leader is obtained according to enterprise architecture, and history engineering is obtained by networking, and all avoids purpose
The possibility that unit is played tricks, is that the real effectiveness of follow-up data is laid a good foundation.
S2, networking obtain each leader and disclose deed and calculate leader's moral integrity point, then according to each leader's moral integrity point
Calculate enterprise's general mood point.Enterprise's general mood is abstract concept, in this step, by scoring leader's moral integrity, by enterprise's general mood amount
Change, be conducive to carrying out enterprise just assessment directly perceived, and those in subordinate positions will follow the example set by their superiors, and enterprise is assessed by leader, it is ensured that assess knot
The reliability of fruit.
Leader's moral integrity computation model and enterprise's general mood computation model are preset with this step, is calculated according to leader's moral integrity
Model and enterprise's general mood computation model calculate leader's moral integrity point and enterprise's general mood point respectively.
Leader's moral integrity computation model is：Moral integrity point=positive information bar number-negative report bar number.Wherein, positive information
The positive information and negative report in deed are disclosed for leader with negative report, specifically, deed is disclosed to leader, can led to
Crossing semantic analysis judges it for positive information or negative report.
Enterprise's general mood computation model is：Enterprise's general mood point=each leader's moral integrity is divided and/leader sum.
S3, each history engineering participant information of acquisition, search for the social mode of each participant, and the disclosure in social mode
The related words and phrases of engineering are captured in information, and participant's moral integrity point is calculated by semantic analysis.
Construction quality and the professional ethics for the participant that constructs, which have, directly to be contacted, in present embodiment, by participant's moral
Row scoring, construction professional ethics that can be indirectly to purpose unit is estimated.
Specifically, in this step, provided with positive semantic set, obtaining semantic with front in crawl words and phrases by semantic analysis
The semantic front words and phrases quantity overlapped in set, then calculates according to the ratio of front words and phrases quantity and crawl words and phrases quantity and participates in
People's moral integrity point.
S4, performed point according to each participant's moral integrity point calculating purpose unit, and calculated and anticipate according to the on-Line review of each history engineering
To the history engineering point of unit.
In this step, execution point computation model is preset with, and according to a point computation model unit of account execution point is performed, perform
Point computation model is：
Unit execution point=participant's moral integrity is divided and/participant's quantity.It can be seen that, perform point assessment is that purpose unit is applied
Work professional ethics.
In step S4, evaluated according to front in on-Line review and the ratio of unfavorable ratings calculates history engineering point.Specifically, positive
Evaluate and the judgement of unfavorable ratings is carried out by semantic analysis.It is worth noting that, in present embodiment, by the history work of extraction
All on-Line reviews of journey integrate evaluation, rather than single history engineering is evaluated one by one, to improve history engineering point calculating
Efficiency.
S5, enterprise's general mood point, history engineering point and unit are performed point substitute into a default sincere assessment models unit of account
Sincerity point.Sincere assessment models are：Unit sincerity point=(enterprise's general mood point+history engineering point × 3+ units execution point × 2)/6.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but protection scope of the present invention be not limited thereto,
Any one skilled in the art the invention discloses technical scope in, technique according to the invention scheme and its
Inventive concept is subject to equivalent substitution or change, should all be included within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (7)
1. a kind of be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed, it is characterised in that comprises the following steps：
S1, reception bid prospectus, and according to bid prospectus preliminary screening purpose unit；Then the top of each purpose unit is obtained
Layer leader, the parallel-connection network history engineering that intelligently selection purpose unit is contracted；
S2, networking obtain each leader and disclose deed and calculate leader's moral integrity point, are then calculated according to each leader's moral integrity point
Enterprise's general mood point；
S3, each history engineering participant information of acquisition, search for the social mode of each participant, and the public information in social mode
Middle crawl engineering correlation words and phrases, and pass through semantic analysis calculating participant moral integrity point；
S4, performed point according to each participant's moral integrity point calculating purpose unit, and purpose list is calculated according to the on-Line review of each history engineering
The history engineering point of position；
S5, enterprise's general mood point, history engineering point and unit perform to point to substitute into default sincere assessment models unit of account sincere
Point.
2. as claimed in claim 1 be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed, it is characterised in that in step S1,
Purpose unit webpage can be obtained according to bid prospectus, enterprise architecture is then obtained by purpose unit webpage；Or directly from
Bid prospectus obtains enterprise architecture；Then, top layer leader is obtained according to enterprise architecture.
3. as claimed in claim 1 or 2 be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed, it is characterised in that step S2
In be preset with leader's moral integrity computation model and enterprise's general mood computation model, according to leader's moral integrity computation model and enterprise's general mood
Computation model calculates leader's moral integrity point and enterprise's general mood point respectively；
Leader's moral integrity computation model is：Moral integrity point=positive information bar number-negative report bar number；
Enterprise's general mood computation model is：Enterprise's general mood point=each leader's moral integrity is divided and/leader sum.
4. as claimed in claim 3 be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed, it is characterised in that in step S3,
Gather provided with positive semanteme, the semantic front words and phrases overlapped in gathering in crawl words and phrases with positive semanteme are obtained by semantic analysis
Quantity, then calculates participant's moral integrity point according to the ratio of front words and phrases quantity and crawl words and phrases quantity.
5. as claimed in claim 1 be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed, it is characterised in that in step S4,
Divide according to performing point computation model unit of account and performing, performing a point computation model is：
Unit execution point=participant's moral integrity is divided and/participant's quantity.
6. as claimed in claim 1 be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed, it is characterised in that in step S4,
Evaluated according to front in on-Line review and the ratio of unfavorable ratings calculates history engineering point.
7. it is applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed as described in claim 4 or 5 or 6, it is characterised in that step
In S5, sincere assessment models are：Unit sincerity point=(enterprise's general mood point+history engineering point × 3+ units execution point × 2)/6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710329029.8A CN107169650A (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2017-05-11 | It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710329029.8A CN107169650A (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2017-05-11 | It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107169650A true CN107169650A (en) | 2017-09-15 |
Family
ID=59814990
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710329029.8A Withdrawn CN107169650A (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2017-05-11 | It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107169650A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109858736A (en) * | 2018-12-15 | 2019-06-07 | 张晓晴 | A kind of decoration company's risk quantification method |
| CN110163460A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-08-23 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus determined using score value |
| CN111062600A (en) * | 2019-12-06 | 2020-04-24 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Model evaluation method, system, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN112529662A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-19 | 林凯 | Bidding method and system based on big data platform and storage medium |
| WO2024018323A1 (en) | 2022-07-18 | 2024-01-25 | Kynisi Digital Solution S.R.L. | System for verifying documents and monitoring traders |
-
2017
- 2017-05-11 CN CN201710329029.8A patent/CN107169650A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110163460A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-08-23 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus determined using score value |
| CN110163460B (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2023-09-19 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and equipment for determining application score |
| CN109858736A (en) * | 2018-12-15 | 2019-06-07 | 张晓晴 | A kind of decoration company's risk quantification method |
| CN111062600A (en) * | 2019-12-06 | 2020-04-24 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Model evaluation method, system, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN111062600B (en) * | 2019-12-06 | 2022-06-14 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Model evaluation method, system, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN112529662A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-19 | 林凯 | Bidding method and system based on big data platform and storage medium |
| WO2024018323A1 (en) | 2022-07-18 | 2024-01-25 | Kynisi Digital Solution S.R.L. | System for verifying documents and monitoring traders |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107169650A (en) | It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed | |
| Thies et al. | Understanding the dynamic interplay of social buzz and contribution behavior within and between online platforms–evidence from crowdfunding | |
| US8260903B2 (en) | System and method for assessing the usability and accessibility of Web 2.0 features and functionalities of websites | |
| Tanko et al. | Stakeholders assessment of constraints to project delivery in the Nigerian construction industry | |
| Basheka et al. | Measuring the performance of contractors in government construction projects in developing countries: Uganda’s context | |
| Bekhet et al. | Assessment of the global financial crisis effects on energy consumption and economic growth in Malaysia: An input–output analysis | |
| Chan et al. | A balanced scorecard approach to measuring industry performance | |
| Xia et al. | Identification of selection criteria for operational variations of the design-build system: A Delphi study in China | |
| Hove et al. | Interaction of technological marketing and Porter’s five competitive forces on SME competitiveness in South Africa | |
| Ščeulovs et al. | Impact of e-environment on SMEs business development | |
| CN107767152A (en) | Product purchase intention analysis method and server | |
| Ha et al. | Firms and export performance: does size matter? | |
| CN102201098A (en) | Auction flighting | |
| Leberknight et al. | The evolution of online social networks: A tutorial survey | |
| CN107194555A (en) | A kind of invitation system that credit and faith degree is analyzed based on big data | |
| Aliyu et al. | Influence of building contractors’ performance on construction process in Nigeria: A review of emerging literature | |
| Dubé et al. | The role of cluster governance in the process of firm internationalization: based on the example of two Malaysian Halal Industrial Parks | |
| CN108228950A (en) | A kind of information processing method and device | |
| Kebah et al. | Growth of online purchase in Saudi Arabia retail industry | |
| Neubert | Post Pandemic Internationalization Behavior | |
| CN107180357A (en) | A kind of way of invitation for bid of comprehensive assessment | |
| TW201305953A (en) | System for providing stock information recommendation | |
| CN107194553A (en) | A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid | |
| Haußmann | The Impact Of Brand Images On The Purchasing Behavior Of Business-To-Business Market Participants | |
| Abbas | The characteristics of successful benchmarking implementation: guidelines for a national strategy for promoting benchmarking |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20170915 |