CN107194553A - A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid - Google Patents
A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107194553A CN107194553A CN201710328994.3A CN201710328994A CN107194553A CN 107194553 A CN107194553 A CN 107194553A CN 201710328994 A CN201710328994 A CN 201710328994A CN 107194553 A CN107194553 A CN 107194553A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- bid
- final election
- project
- hardware
- software
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid, selected by the progressive formula to the object that calls for bid, bid object is selected from strength, innovation and development speed, qualification etc. are many-sided, the development in all directions of the professional virtue and vocational skills of final contractor can be ensured, so as to be laid the foundation for the completion project for bidding of high-effect high-quality.Also ensure that the contractor selected, to the familiarity of project for bidding, so as to improve construction quality, saves engineering time.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to bid technical field, more particularly to a kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid.
Background technology
Bid is condition and the requirement for disclosing goods, engineering or services procurement within the specific limits, invites numerous bidders
Bid is participated in, and therefrom selects according to regulation program a kind of marketing behavior of trading object.
At present, in bidding process, assessment object is bid prospectus, and assessment object is single, and evidence is insufficient, is unfavorable for recruiting
Correct judgement is made to tenderer in mark side.
The content of the invention
The technical problem existed based on background technology, the present invention proposes a kind of software and hardware assessment side for being applied to bid
Method.
A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid proposed by the present invention, comprises the following steps：
S1, reception bid prospectus, and according to bid prospectus preliminary screening preparation object；
The history construction plan book of projects since S2, each prepared object foundation of acquisition, and obtain each prepared object trick
The target construction plan book of mark project；
S3, the history construction plan book of each prepared object arranged according to Production Time, with the order drawn near
With reference to history construction plan book analysis preparation object technology progress speed and renewal of the equipment speed；
S4, according to technological progress speed and renewal of the equipment speed assign preparation object one progressive rate value, according to target
Construction plan book degree of perfection assigns preparation one engineering project score value of object；
S5, final election object screened from preparation object according to progressive rate value and engineering project point；
S6, for each final election object, choose in its history engineering with the immediate engineering project of project for bidding as a comparison
Project；
S7, according to each contrast project final election object similarity score corresponding with the similarity degree imparting of project for bidding, and
Contractor is chosen from final election object according to similarity score.
Preferably, in step S4, progressive rate value=(technological progress speed × 2+ renewal of the equipment speed)/3.
Preferably, in step S4, construction plan book degree of perfection can regard scoring average as work by assessing participant's scoring
Journey meter divide value.
Preferably, in step S5, progressive rate value and engineering project point is substituted into default final election model and calculate final election point,
Then final election object is taken according to final election sorting.
Preferably, in step S5, final election model is：Final election point=(progressive rate value+engineering project point × 2)/3.
Preferably, in step S5, final election object is chosen according to final election point score value or ranking.
In the present invention, the primary election by step S1 to bid prospectus, it is ensured that preparation object possesses basic quality, reduces
Follow-up screening operation amount；By step S2-S5, the test and appraisal of the creative quality and development potentiality to preparation object can be achieved, and can
Ensure contractor to the perfect of the preparation of highway bids；Pass through step S6 and S7, it is ensured that the contractor selected is to bid
The familiarity of project, so as to improve construction quality, saves engineering time.
In the present invention, selected by the progressive formula to the object that calls for bid, from strength, innovation and development speed, qualification
Bid object is selected Deng many-sided, it is ensured that the professional virtue of final contractor and the hair in all directions of vocational skills
Exhibition, so as to be laid the foundation for the completion project for bidding of high-effect high-quality.Also ensure the contractor selected to the ripe of project for bidding
Degree is known, so as to improve construction quality, engineering time is saved.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is a kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure flow chart for being applied to bid proposed by the present invention.
Embodiment
A kind of reference picture 1, software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid proposed by the present invention, comprises the following steps.
S1, reception bid prospectus, and according to bid prospectus preliminary screening preparation object.
In this step, preferred the underproof bid prospectus of form can be deleted, then obtain bid evaluator to remaining
Each bid prospectus of specification is scored, and then chooses prepared object automatically according to score.Specifically, it is forward to choose score value
Bid prospectus correspondence unit be used as preparation object.
The history construction plan book of projects since S2, each prepared object foundation of acquisition, and obtain each prepared object trick
The target construction plan book of mark project.
S3, the history construction plan book of each prepared object arranged according to Production Time, with the order drawn near
With reference to history construction plan book analysis preparation object technology progress speed and renewal of the equipment speed.
In this step, the interval time computing technique progress between the two parts of construction plan books that can be had made marked progress according to tool
Speed and renewal of the equipment speed, specifically, the interval time technically having between two parts of construction plan books having made marked progress get over
Long, then technological progress speed is lower；Has the interval time between two parts of construction plan books having made marked progress in construction equipment
Longer, then equipment advance speed is lower.
S4, according to technological progress speed and renewal of the equipment speed assign preparation object one progressive rate value, according to target
Construction plan book degree of perfection assigns preparation one engineering project score value of object.In this step, carried out based on technological progress single
The progressive rate value evaluation in position, specifically, progressive rate value=(technological progress speed × 2+ renewal of the equipment speed)/3.
In this step, construction plan book degree of perfection can regard scoring average as engineering project by assessing participant's scoring
Score value, will pass through artificial scoring, improves the flexibility evaluated and validity.
S5、
Progressive rate value and engineering project point are substituted into default final election model calculating final election to divide, then sorted according to final election
Take final election object
, final election model is：Final election point=(progressive rate value+engineering project point × 2)/3.Specifically, in this step, according to
Final election point score value or ranking choose final election object.In this way, final election point is calculated automatically with reference to final election model, and it is automatic to preparation pair
As being ranked up, be conducive to improving operating efficiency.
S6, for each final election object, choose in its history engineering with the immediate engineering project of project for bidding as a comparison
Project.
S7, according to each contrast project final election object similarity score corresponding with the similarity degree imparting of project for bidding, and
Contractor is chosen from final election object according to similarity score.
With reference to step S6 and S7, it can be scored by manually for comparative run purpose similarity, and the average conduct that will score
Similarity score, then chooses similarity score highest final election object and is used as contractor.So, it is ensured that the contractor selected
To the familiarity of project for bidding, so as to improve construction quality, engineering time is saved.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but protection scope of the present invention be not limited thereto,
Any one skilled in the art the invention discloses technical scope in, technique according to the invention scheme and its
Inventive concept is subject to equivalent substitution or change, should all be included within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. a kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps：
S1, reception bid prospectus, and according to bid prospectus preliminary screening preparation object；
The history construction plan book of projects since S2, each prepared object foundation of acquisition, and obtain each prepared object bid item
Purpose target construction plan book；
S3, the history construction plan book of each prepared object arranged according to Production Time, combined with the order drawn near
History construction plan book analysis preparation object technology progress speed and renewal of the equipment speed；
S4, according to technological progress speed and renewal of the equipment speed assign preparation object one progressive rate value, constructed according to target
Prospectus degree of perfection assigns preparation one engineering project score value of object；
S5, final election object screened from preparation object according to progressive rate value and engineering project point；
S6, for each final election object, choose in its history engineering with the immediate engineering project of project for bidding project as a comparison；
S7, according to each contrast project final election object similarity score corresponding with the similarity degree imparting of project for bidding, and according to
Similarity score chooses contractor from final election object.
2. the software and hardware appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 1 for being applied to bid, it is characterised in that in step S4, enter leg speed
Rate value=(technological progress speed × 2+ renewal of the equipment speed)/3.
3. the software and hardware appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 1 for being applied to bid, it is characterised in that in step S4, construction meter
Scoring average can be regard as engineering project score value by assessing participant's scoring by drawing book degree of perfection.
4. the software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid as described in claim 1 or 2 or 3, it is characterised in that in step S5,
Progressive rate value and engineering project point are substituted into default final election model calculating final election to divide, final election pair is then taken according to final election sorting
As.
5. the software and hardware appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 4 for being applied to bid, it is characterised in that in step S5, final election mould
Type is：Final election point=(progressive rate value+engineering project point × 2)/3.
6. the software and hardware appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 5 for being applied to bid, it is characterised in that in step S5, according to multiple
Choosing point score value or ranking choose final election object.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710328994.3A CN107194553A (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2017-05-11 | A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710328994.3A CN107194553A (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2017-05-11 | A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107194553A true CN107194553A (en) | 2017-09-22 |
Family
ID=59873804
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710328994.3A Pending CN107194553A (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2017-05-11 | A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107194553A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108182116A (en) * | 2018-01-23 | 2018-06-19 | 江苏国泰新点软件有限公司 | A kind of bidding documents analysis method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102324080A (en) * | 2011-09-06 | 2012-01-18 | 上海互联网软件有限公司 | Bidding system and method |
| CN103235983A (en) * | 2013-04-23 | 2013-08-07 | 浪潮集团山东通用软件有限公司 | Multi-dimensional automatic supplier evaluation method |
| CN106294532A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2017-01-04 | 广东电网有限责任公司信息中心 | The image appraisal algorithm analyzed based on microblog emotional |
-
2017
- 2017-05-11 CN CN201710328994.3A patent/CN107194553A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102324080A (en) * | 2011-09-06 | 2012-01-18 | 上海互联网软件有限公司 | Bidding system and method |
| CN103235983A (en) * | 2013-04-23 | 2013-08-07 | 浪潮集团山东通用软件有限公司 | Multi-dimensional automatic supplier evaluation method |
| CN106294532A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2017-01-04 | 广东电网有限责任公司信息中心 | The image appraisal algorithm analyzed based on microblog emotional |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 董云芬: "工程量清单模式下的招投标研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 经济与管理科技辑》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108182116A (en) * | 2018-01-23 | 2018-06-19 | 江苏国泰新点软件有限公司 | A kind of bidding documents analysis method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Lall et al. | Latin American industrial competitiveness and the challenge of globalization | |
| CN107169650A (en) | It is a kind of to be applied to the sincere toolization methods of marking that bid is assessed | |
| Chan et al. | A balanced scorecard approach to measuring industry performance | |
| CN107194552A (en) | A kind of intelligence bid platform | |
| CN108711097A (en) | Online bidding method and its system | |
| Park et al. | Rough diamonds: The four traits of successful breakout firms in BRIC countries | |
| Marsden | A phoenix from the ashes of apprenticeship? Vocational training in Britain | |
| CN109255691A (en) | Acquisition methods, device and the computer readable storage medium of acceptance of the bid supplier | |
| CN107194553A (en) | A kind of software and hardware appraisal procedure for being applied to bid | |
| Krasnokutskaya et al. | Trading across borders in online auctions | |
| Omran et al. | Determining the critical factors in ensuring the accuracy of cost estimate in obtaining a tender | |
| US20070130045A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for tracking the progress of an auction | |
| CN111985808B (en) | Method and device for matching movable row tables | |
| CN107169651A (en) | A kind of contractor's professional skill assessment system analyzed based on big data | |
| CN107578324A (en) | The expression and device of large petroleum chemicals e-commerce platform quantity purchase | |
| CN107016474A (en) | A kind of manufacturing service appraisal procedure screened based on multi-party participation and dynamic combined | |
| Zainal et al. | Success Factor for Project Management on High Rise Building Project | |
| CN107194555A (en) | A kind of invitation system that credit and faith degree is analyzed based on big data | |
| CN107180357A (en) | A kind of way of invitation for bid of comprehensive assessment | |
| Bell | The prospects for industrialisation in the new South Africa | |
| Adnan et al. | Partnering for small medium contractors in Malaysia | |
| Sadeghpour et al. | A Comparative Study of Owner, Contractor, and Consultant Perspective on the Selection Criteria for Subcontractors. | |
| Pryor et al. | Lean selling: slash your sales cycle and drive profitable, predictable revenue growth by giving buyers what they really want | |
| Gupta | Studying the reverse auction bidding game for the role variants of guardians in the facilities management industry | |
| Buertey et al. | Procurement of Developmental Projects in Ghana: A Literature Review of the Designer-Led System Verses the Producer-Led Systems |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170922 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |