CN106777416B - The other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation - Google Patents
The other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106777416B CN106777416B CN201510804681.1A CN201510804681A CN106777416B CN 106777416 B CN106777416 B CN 106777416B CN 201510804681 A CN201510804681 A CN 201510804681A CN 106777416 B CN106777416 B CN 106777416B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- gauze
- unit
- pin
- commutative
- version
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Design And Manufacture Of Integrated Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides a kind of other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation, belong to semiconductor integrated circuit the Automation Design field, for comparing the difference between two schematic diagram versions, can ignore that the physical location of device or gauze move or the difference on the physical coordinates such as rotating mirror-image and the pin interchangeability of device caused by topological structure difference.The present invention first carries out hierarchical topology Relationship Comparison, then successively compare all devices and institute's wired network inside each unit according to inverse topological order, according to the topological relation of circuit connection, only by schematic diagram circuit topological structure or device attribute etc. influence the key difference of simulation result and analyze.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to semiconductor integrated circuit the Automation Design fields, relate generally to schematic diagram (Schematic) and are setting
Comparison in difference during meter between different editions.
Background technique
IC designer will do it circuit simulation after completing principle diagram design during schematic diagram design,
If simulation result does not reach expected design target, schematic diagram can be modified and re-start emulation, it could even be possible to can be because
Modification is cancelled not as good as last design for simulation result, does not stop loop iteration so until schematic diagram meets expected design
Until.Therefore, in the design process of schematic diagram, principle diagram design is inevitably constantly modified, to generate different
Schematic diagram version.
Principle diagram design person understands the specific difference between comparison principle figure different editions, causes simulation result to analyze
The reason of difference, in order to improve circuit topological structure or device attribute, therefore clears the difference between the schematic diagrams of different editions
It is different particularly important for designer.For circuit designers, difference mainly includes circuit topological structure, device attribute etc.
Influence the key difference of simulation result;But for schematic diagram, difference is embodied in any the one of schematic diagram database file
Kind of change, other than circuit topological structure, device attribute etc. influence the key difference of simulation result, to device or gauze
Physical location moves or rotating mirror-image etc. will also result in the difference of schematic diagram database file.In addition, principle chart database is logical
Often be made of binary file, principle diagram design person can not directly " seeing clearly " different editions schematic diagram between difference.
Other than helping the schematic diagram difference of principle diagram design person's analyzing influence simulation result, some special circumstances can also
It can need to be compared between the different editions to schematic diagram, and difference caused by the pin interchangeability of device can be ignored,
Therefore intuitively analyzing the key difference between different editions can effectively help principle diagram design person to improve working efficiency.
Summary of the invention
(1) technical problems to be solved
The present invention provides a kind of other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation, for comparing two principle plates
Difference between this, can ignore that the physical location of device or gauze move or the physical coordinates such as rotating mirror-image on difference
Topological structure difference caused by different and device pin interchangeability, according to the topological relation of circuit connection, only by schematic diagram
In circuit topological structure or device attribute etc. influence the key difference of simulation result and analyze.
(2) technical solution
Technical solution of the present invention includes the following steps:
Step 1: reading in two different editions of principle diagram design, first carry out hierarchical topology Relationship Comparison, show that level is poor
Different and generate corresponding unit (Cell) sequence simultaneously, corresponding unit is by a pair respectively from the unit of two different editions of schematic diagram
Composition;
Step 2: traversing corresponding unit sequence according to inverse topological order, compare the local data of corresponding unit, including compare pair
All devices (Instance) for answering unit, compare institute's wired network (Wire) of corresponding unit, and obtain between corresponding unit
The difference that all device attributes are connected with gauze
Wherein hierarchical topology Relationship Comparison described in step 1 specifically includes:
Step 1.1: from top layer unit, (the Top Cell) traverses two schematic diagrams, by the topological call relation table of unit
Two are shown as using top layer unit as the digraph of root node;
Step 1.2: topological sorting is carried out to two digraphs and obtains topological sequences, the longest path of node to root node
Length is defined as the depth of node, and the topological sequences of two digraphs are then traversed according to topological order, by depth is identical and name
The identical unit of word forms corresponding unit, and corresponding unit sequence is added, it is impossible to which the unit for forming corresponding unit is directly remembered
Record into non-corresponding unit;
Wherein all devices of comparison corresponding unit described in step 2, specifically include:
Step 2.1: for given corresponding unit, arbitrarily choosing a unit in two versions, traverse selected cell
Interior all devices, establish name Hash table;
Step 2.2: all devices in the unit of another version are traversed, name Hash table is searched, if searching successfully,
There is same name, then a pair of of device markings by the two from different editions are that respective devices are marked if searching failure
It is denoted as difference device;
Step 2.3: all devices in traversal Hash table are then labeled as no pass flag at the device of respective devices
Difference device;
Step 2.4: all respective devices are successively traversed, traverse all properties of device and more each attribute value one by one,
Attribute includes type of device and device parameters, if it exists not same alike result value, then illustrates that there are attribute differences for this group of respective devices.
Wherein institute's wired network of comparison corresponding unit described in step 2, specifically includes:
Step 2.5: assigning characteristic value to all devices, traverse all devices in corresponding unit in two version units respectively
Part, for being labeled as one unique characteristic value of then imparting of respective devices, for being labeled as the then imparting feature of difference device
Value is 0;
Step 2.6: assigning characteristic value to all types of device pins, assigned uniquely for not having the pin of exchangeability
Characteristic value, and one for that can be exchanged with each other group of pin assigns identical unique features value, for the device of cell refernce type
Part then assigns unique features value according to the gauze corresponding relationship connected inside unit pin, the company, gauze institute with corresponding relationship
The unit pin characteristic value having the same connect;
Step 2.7: respectively traverse corresponding unit in two versions unit in institute's wired network, calculated to each gauze
One characteristic value, this feature value be equal to gauze connection all device feature values with connect pin characteristic value product square it
With i.e. characteristic value=Sum ((characteristic value of device feature value x connection pin) ^2);
Step 2.8: will collect with the gauze of same characteristic features value in the same set, if just including one in a set
To the gauze respectively from two versions, then mark this pair of of gauze for corresponding gauze, if a set only includes a gauze,
It is then labeled as difference gauze, the gauze in other set is labeled as commutative gauze;
Step 2.9: commutative gauze if it exists traverses all respective devices, and successively traverses all pins on device,
If the gauze connected on pin is commutative gauze, the gauze connected in the identical pin positions of respective devices is checked, if
Belong to the same commutative gauze set, then this pair of commutative gauze is directly labeled as corresponding gauze and can be handed over from original respectively
It is removed in thread-changing net collective;
Step 2.10: if still having commutative gauze, traversing all respective devices, and successively traverse all on device
Pin, if the gauze connected on pin be commutative gauze, be examined successively in respective devices with same characteristic features value can
The gauze connected in exchange pin positions, if belonging to the same commutative gauze set, directly by this pair of commutative line
Network mark is denoted as corresponding gauze and removes from former commutative gauze set respectively;
Step 2.11: all respective devices are traversed, and successively traverse all pins on device, if connected on pin
Gauze is not corresponding gauze, then checks the gauze connected in the identical pin positions of respective devices, if not corresponding gauze, then directly
It connects and the gauze label connected on this pair of of pin is revised as discrepant corresponding gauze, otherwise continue to check with same characteristic features
The gauze connected in the commutative pin positions of value is not the pin of corresponding gauze until discovery one, then directly by this
Discrepant corresponding gauze is revised as to the gauze label connected on pin;
(3) beneficial effect
Technical solution of the present invention, when difference between two versions of comparison principle figure, not comparator device or line
The physical coordinates position of net, thus device or gauze move or rotating mirror-image etc. caused by difference on physical coordinates can be neglected
Slightly, while the pin interchangeability of device is considered in comparison procedure, it is poor can to ignore the commutative caused topological structure of pin
It is different, in this way according to the topological relation of circuit connection, only by schematic diagram circuit topological structure or the influences such as device attribute emulate
As a result key difference, which analyzes, to be come, and had both been helped principle diagram design person to have found key difference, and had also been neglected useless coordinate
Etc. differences.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 compares flow chart
The hierarchical topology relational graph of Fig. 2 example
The TOP unit version 1 of Fig. 3 example
The TOP unit version 2 of Fig. 4 example
The inv unit version 1 of Fig. 5 example
The inv unit version 2 of Fig. 6 example
The test unit version 1 of Fig. 7 example
The test unit version 2 of Fig. 8 example
Specific embodiment
Overall procedure of the invention as shown in Figure 1, understand technical solution, below with reference to the act in Fig. 2-Fig. 8 for convenience
Example, specific embodiments of the present invention will be described in further detail.
For example: Fig. 3-Fig. 8 is two different versions of the schematic diagram drawn using mainstream principle diagram design tool
This, Fig. 2 is the hierarchical topology relational graph of entire schematic diagram, and version 1 is as the hierarchical topology relationship of version 2, wherein Fig. 3, Fig. 4
It is the version 1 and version 2 of TOP corresponding unit respectively, calls subelement inv, test, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 are inv corresponding unit respectively
Version 1 and version 2, Fig. 7, Fig. 8 are the version 1 and version 2 of test corresponding unit respectively.For this example, version 1 is compared
Difference between version 2, for ease of description, without exception by the number of version 1 when occurring the concepts such as unit, device or gauze in pairs
According to being placed on first, second then comes from version 2.
Specific implementation step is as follows:
Step 1: the version of two schematic diagrams is read in, hierarchical topology Relationship Comparison is first carried out:
Step 1.1: traversing the version of two schematic diagrams from top layer unit, the topological call relation of unit is expressed as
Two using top layer unit TOP as the digraph of root node, as shown in Figure 2;
Step 1.2: topological sortings are carried out to two digraphs, topological sequences as obtaining two TOP, inv,
Test }, the length of the longest path of node to root node is defined as the depth of node, therefore TOP unit depth is 0, inv,
The depth of test unit is 1, and the topological sequences of two digraphs are traversed according to topological order, depth is identical and name is identical
Unit formed corresponding unit, therefore formed corresponding unit sequence (TOP, TOP), (inv, inv), (test, test), this example
There is no non-corresponding unit.
Step 2: traverse corresponding unit sequence according to inverse topological order, i.e., (test, test), (inv, inv), (TOP, TOP)
In each corresponding unit, compare the local data of corresponding unit, all devices including comparing corresponding unit are relatively corresponding single
Institute's wired network of member, and obtain the difference that all device attributes between corresponding unit are connected with gauze.It is corresponding single in this example
First (TOP, TOP) does not do substantial modifications between two edition datas of (inv, inv), that is, does not have " key " difference, therefore
To illustrate step 2 for corresponding unit (test, test), specific step is as follows:
Compare all devices of corresponding unit (test, test) first, the specific steps are as follows:
Step 2.1: the unit test of version 1, all devices in Traversal Unit, including R0, R1, M0, M1, M2, M3 are selected,
M4, M5, D0 establish name Hash table;
Step 2.2: traversing all devices in the unit test of version 2, including R0, R1, M0, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, look into
The name Hash table established in step 2.1 is looked for, by taking R0 as an example, there are the devices of same name in Hash table, then mark version 1
The R0 of R0 and version 2 is respective devices, therefore obtains respective devices after all devices of traversal and include (R0, R0), (R1, R1),
(M0,M0),(M1,M1),(M2,M2),(M3,M3),(M4,M4),(M5,M5).
Step 2.3: the Hash table established in traversal step 2.1, since D0 is not marked as respective devices, by version
Device D0 in 1 is labeled as difference device;
Step 2.4: successively traverse all respective devices, including (R0, R0), (R1, R1), (M0, M0), (M1, M1), (M2,
M2), (M3, M3), (M4, M4), (M5, M5) traverse all properties of device and more each attribute value, one by one with (R0, R0)
For, type of device is identical, and R0 is there are attribute r and r=800 in version 1, and attribute r=200 of the same name R0 in version 2, attribute value is not
It is identical, therefore there are attribute differences for respective devices (R0, R0);Similarly, there is also attribute differences for respective devices (R1, R1);
That is, device relatively after find difference at 3: D0 difference device, the category of respective devices (R0, R0) and (R1, R1) in total
Sex differernce.
Then completeer device compares institute's wired network, the specific steps are as follows:
Step 2.5: characteristic value is assigned to all devices, for being labeled as one unique feature of imparting of respective devices
Value, for example (R0, R0) is respective devices, therefore the characteristic value phase of the characteristic value of the R0 after assignment in version 1 and the R0 in version 2
It is same but different from other devices, and the characteristic value of difference device D0 is 0, the characteristic value of whole devices is as follows:
1 device version 2 device feature value of version
R0 R0 11
R1 R1 13
M0 M0 15
M1 M1 17
M2 M2 19
M3 M3 21
M4 M4 23
M5 M5 25
D0 0
Step 2.6: characteristic value is assigned to all device pin types, the pin that resistance type device R 0 waits has P/N two,
And it can exchange, therefore characteristic value having the same, the pin of MOSFET element M0 etc. has D/G/S/B tetra-, and wherein D/S can
With exchange, the pin of diode component D0 has P/N two and cannot exchange, therefore the characteristic value of device pin is listed as follows:
The resistance type device pin list of feature values:
Pin characteristic value
P 1
N 1
The MOSFET types of devices pin list of feature values:
Pin characteristic value
D 1
G 3
S 1
B 5
The diode type device pin list of feature values:
Pin characteristic value
P 1
N 3
Step 2.7: respectively traverse corresponding unit in two versions unit in institute's wired network, calculated to each gauze
One characteristic value, by taking the gauze BYP in version 1 as an example, gauze BYP is connected respectively to M1 and M4, M1 by the pin G of MOSFET
Characteristic value 17, the characteristic value 23 of M4, the characteristic value 3 of pin G, therefore the calculation equation of the characteristic value of gauze BYP are as follows:
Characteristic value=(17x3) ^2+ (23x3) ^2,
That is characteristic value=7362 of the gauze BYP of version 1 similarly calculate the characteristic value of version 1 and version 2 institute wired network;
Step 2.8: to institute's wired network after calculating characteristic value, will collect with the gauze of same characteristic features value in the same collection
It closes, it can be deduced that following set:
Gather 1 { { the gauze BIAS of version 1 }, { the gauze BIAS of version 2 } }
Gather 2 { { the gauze net1 of version 1 }, { the gauze net1 of version 2 } }
Gather 3 { { the gauze net2 of version 1 }, { the gauze net2 of version 2 } }
Gather 4 { { the gauze VDD of version 1!, { the gauze VDD of version 2!}}
Gather 5 { { the gauze GND of version 1!, { the gauze GND of version 2!}}
Gather 6 { { the gauze FB of version 1 }, { the gauze FB of version 2 } }
Gather 7 { { the gauze C2 of version 1 }, { the gauze C2 of version 2 } }
Gathered for 8 { { the gauze BYP of version 1 }, { } }
Gathered for 9 { { the gauze C1 of version 1 }, { } }
Gather 10 { { }, { the gauze BYP of version 2 } }
Gather 11 { { }, { the gauze C1 of version 2 } }
For, just comprising a pair of gauze set respectively from two versions, marking this pair of of gauze is to correspond in set
Gauze, set 1, set 2, set 3, set 4, set 5, set 6, set 7 meet the requirements, thus obtain corresponding gauze (BIAS,
BIAS), (net1,net1), (net2,net2), (VDD!,VDD!), (GND!, GND!), (FB,FB), (C2,C2);
For only including a gauze in set, it is directly labeled as difference gauze, gauze BYP, C1 of version 1, version 2
Gauze BYP, C1 meet the requirements labeled as difference gauze;There is no commutative gauze in this example;
Step 2.9: without commutative gauze;
Step 2.10: without commutative gauze;
Step 2.11: traversing all respective devices, when traversing respective devices (M1, M1), traverse the pin of (M1, M1)
D/G/S/B, it is not corresponding gauze that BYP is wherein connected on the M1 pin G of version 1, therefore checks the M1 pin G of corresponding version 2, by
In the gauze BYP of the M1 pin G connection of version 2 be not equally corresponding gauze, then by the gauze BYP of version 1 and the gauze of version 2
BYP, which forms corresponding gauze and modifies, is labeled as discrepant corresponding gauze (BYP, BYP);Similarly it can be found that discrepant correspondence
Gauze (C1, C1);
That is, finding the difference of gauze at 2 altogether by the institute's wired network for comparing corresponding unit (test, test):
(BYP, BYP), (C1, C1)
In this way, by the comparison of corresponding unit (test, test), gauze difference at component variations and 2 is found at 3 altogether:
D0 difference device, the attribute difference of respective devices (R0, R0) and (R1, R1), gauze (BYP, BYP), gauze (C1, C1), and it is real
Pin BIAS and the physical location of pin BIAS in version 2 are significantly different in version 1 on border, but not are reported out and.
The above is only a kind of preferred embodiment of the invention, it should be pointed out that for the technology people of the art
For member, without departing from the technical principles of the invention, a variety of deformations, such as the deformation of hash function can also be made
Etc., these deformations should also be as belonging to the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims (3)
1. the other version comparison method present of the schematic diagram based on topological relation, which is characterized in that described method includes following steps:
Step 1: reading in two different editions of principle diagram design, first carry out hierarchical topology Relationship Comparison, obtain level difference
And corresponding unit sequence is generated simultaneously, unit of the corresponding unit by a pair respectively from two different editions of schematic diagram forms;
Step 2: traversing corresponding unit sequence according to inverse topological order, compare the local data of corresponding unit, including relatively corresponding more single
All devices of member, compare institute's wired network of corresponding unit, and show that all device attributes between corresponding unit and gauze connect
The difference connect;
All devices of the relatively corresponding unit, steps are as follows:
Step 2.1: for given corresponding unit, arbitrarily choosing a unit in two versions, traverse in selected cell
All devices establish name Hash table;
Step 2.2: traversing all devices in the unit of another version, search name Hash table and have if searching successfully
There is same name, then a pair of of device markings by the two from different editions are that respective devices are labeled as if searching failure
Difference device;
Step 2.3: all devices in traversal Hash table are then labeled as difference at the device of respective devices for no pass flag
Device;
Step 2.4: successively traversing all respective devices, traverse all properties of device and more each attribute value, attribute one by one
Including type of device and device parameters, not same alike result value, then illustrate that there are attribute differences for the respective devices if it exists.
2. the other version comparison method present of the schematic diagram according to claim 1 based on topological relation, which is characterized in that it is described into
The step of row hierarchical topology Relationship Comparison, is as follows:
Step 1.1: traversing two schematic diagrams from top layer unit, the topological call relation of unit is expressed as two with top layer
Unit is the digraph of root node;
Step 1.2: topological sorting being carried out to two digraphs and obtains topological sequences, the length of the longest path of node to root node
It is defined as the depth of node, the topological sequences of two digraphs are then traversed according to topological order, by depth is identical and name phase
Same unit forms corresponding unit, and corresponding unit sequence is added, it is impossible to which the unit for forming corresponding unit is directly recorded as
Non-corresponding unit.
3. the other version comparison method present of the schematic diagram according to claim 1 based on topological relation, which is characterized in that described
Compare institute's wired network of corresponding unit, steps are as follows:
Step 2.5: characteristic value is assigned to all devices, traverses all devices in corresponding unit in two version units respectively,
For being labeled as one unique characteristic value of then imparting of respective devices, it is for the then imparting characteristic value labeled as difference device
0;
Step 2.6: characteristic value is assigned to all types of device pins, it is unique special for not having the imparting of the pin of exchangeability
Value indicative, and one for that can be exchanged with each other group of pin assigns identical unique features value, for the device of cell refernce type, then
Unique features value is assigned according to the gauze corresponding relationship connected inside unit pin, the list that the gauze with corresponding relationship is connected
First pin characteristic value having the same;
Step 2.7: respectively traverse corresponding unit in two versions unit in institute's wired network, calculate one to each gauze
Characteristic value, this feature value are equal to all device feature values that gauze connects and the sum of the product square for connecting pin characteristic value, i.e.,
Characteristic value=Sum ((characteristic value of device feature value x connection pin) ^2);
Step 2.8: will collect with the gauze of same characteristic features value in the same set, if just comprising a pair of point in a set
Gauze not from two versions then marks this pair of of gauze to mark for corresponding gauze if a set only includes a gauze
It is denoted as difference gauze, the gauze in other set is labeled as commutative gauze;
Step 2.9: commutative gauze if it exists traverses all respective devices, and successively traverses all pins on device, if pipe
The gauze connected on foot is commutative gauze, then the gauze connected in the identical pin positions of respective devices is checked, if belonging to
This pair of commutative gauze is then directly labeled as corresponding gauze and respectively from former commutative line by the same commutative gauze set
It is removed in net collective;
Step 2.10: if still having commutative gauze, traversing all respective devices, and successively traverse all pipes on device
Handing over same characteristic features value in respective devices is examined successively if the gauze connected on pin is commutative gauze in foot
The gauze connected in pin positions is changed, if belonging to the same commutative gauze set, directly by this pair of commutative gauze
It is removed labeled as correspondence gauze and respectively from former commutative gauze set;
Step 2.11: traversing all respective devices, and successively traverse all pins on device, if the gauze connected on pin
It is not corresponding gauze, then checks the gauze connected in the identical pin positions of respective devices, if not corresponding gauze, then directly will
The gauze label connected on this pair of of pin is revised as discrepant corresponding gauze, otherwise continues to check with same characteristic features value
The gauze connected in commutative pin positions is not the pin of corresponding gauze until discovery one, then directly manages this pair
The gauze label connected on foot is revised as discrepant corresponding gauze.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510804681.1A CN106777416B (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2015-11-20 | The other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510804681.1A CN106777416B (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2015-11-20 | The other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106777416A CN106777416A (en) | 2017-05-31 |
CN106777416B true CN106777416B (en) | 2019-11-15 |
Family
ID=58916808
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510804681.1A Active CN106777416B (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2015-11-20 | The other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106777416B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107239616B (en) * | 2017-06-06 | 2020-07-10 | 北京华大九天软件有限公司 | Comparison method of integrated circuit schematic diagram |
CN108090165B (en) * | 2017-12-13 | 2021-12-28 | 美林数据技术股份有限公司 | Method for acquiring map change difference based on embedded graph database |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102402631A (en) * | 2010-09-10 | 2012-04-04 | 北京华大九天软件有限公司 | Method for comparing hierarchical net list of integrated circuit |
CN102542083A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-07-04 | 北京晶智意达科技有限公司 | Method for adjusting hierarchical unit ports based on connection relational tree |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8893069B2 (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2014-11-18 | Synopsys, Inc. | Method of schematic driven layout creation |
-
2015
- 2015-11-20 CN CN201510804681.1A patent/CN106777416B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102402631A (en) * | 2010-09-10 | 2012-04-04 | 北京华大九天软件有限公司 | Method for comparing hierarchical net list of integrated circuit |
CN102542083A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-07-04 | 北京晶智意达科技有限公司 | Method for adjusting hierarchical unit ports based on connection relational tree |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106777416A (en) | 2017-05-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN105471637B (en) | A kind of complex network node importance appraisal procedure and system | |
CN109005055B (en) | Complex network information node importance evaluation method based on multi-scale topological space | |
Zhang et al. | Extracting analyzing and visualizing triangle k-core motifs within networks | |
Soliman et al. | Supporting ranking queries on uncertain and incomplete data | |
CN104199969B (en) | Web data analysis method and device | |
US20070044051A1 (en) | Method and system for validating a hierarchical simulation database | |
Cao et al. | Querying similar process models based on the Hungarian algorithm | |
CN106777416B (en) | The other version comparison method present of schematic diagram based on topological relation | |
CN110716539B (en) | Fault diagnosis and analysis method and device | |
Ma et al. | Decomposition‐based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for community detection in dynamic social networks | |
CN116258111B (en) | Static analog integrated circuit layout analysis method | |
CN117235950B (en) | Natural gas pipe network steady-state simulation method, medium and equipment based on Newton iteration method | |
CN109783706A (en) | Data processing method, device and the electronic equipment of pipe network topological relation | |
Lin et al. | Human-powered data cleaning for probabilistic reachability queries on uncertain graphs | |
CN103077255B (en) | Identification method and system for 3D (three-dimensional) model of nuclear power station | |
Hassani et al. | I-hastream: density-based hierarchical clustering of big data streams and its application to big graph analytics tools | |
CN109684734A (en) | A kind of method of inspection model matrix | |
WO2020215505A1 (en) | Multi-dimensional correlation generation method and system for network alarm rules | |
Firth et al. | Workload-aware streaming graph partitioning. | |
US10691867B2 (en) | Identifying root cause of layout versus schematic errors | |
Shemshadi et al. | Efficient pattern matching for graphs with multi-labeled nodes | |
CN105631062A (en) | Method for detecting connection relations of integrated circuit line nets | |
CN108399284A (en) | It is a kind of about subtracted based on deviation big data Trading Model analysis and restorative procedure | |
Srinivasan et al. | A shared-memory algorithm for updating tree-based properties of large dynamic networks | |
Ahmed et al. | L-graphs and monotone L-graphs |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CP01 | Change in the name or title of a patent holder |
Address after: 100102 Beijing city two Chaoyang District Lize Road No. 2 A block two layer Patentee after: Beijing Huada Jiutian Technology Co.,Ltd. Address before: 100102 Beijing city two Chaoyang District Lize Road No. 2 A block two layer Patentee before: HUADA EMPYREAN SOFTWARE Co.,Ltd. |
|
CP01 | Change in the name or title of a patent holder |