CN106204148A - Agency's site selection evaluating method and system - Google Patents
Agency's site selection evaluating method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106204148A CN106204148A CN201610559621.2A CN201610559621A CN106204148A CN 106204148 A CN106204148 A CN 106204148A CN 201610559621 A CN201610559621 A CN 201610559621A CN 106204148 A CN106204148 A CN 106204148A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- agency
- evaluated
- actually used
- service
- users
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of agency's site selection evaluating method and system, if being provided with multiple agency in a region, each some distance away from each agency in zoning, using agency closest for this point as the ownership of this point；The coverage belonging to all formation of each agency is divided into the theoretical service area of this agency；The actually used user of each agency in adding up a time period, analyzes address or the job site of actually used user according to the user profile of each actually used user；Address according to all of actually used user of each agency or job site mark off the active service scope of agency；The relatively active service scope of each agency and theoretical service area, and show the evaluation result of the real value of agency.The present invention realizes the evaluation of the addressing to each agency, it is not necessary to expend substantial amounts of manpower and materials, so that it may provide the follow-up further analysis of the evaluation result of each agency's addressing, beneficially staff.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the addressing of the agency of agency such as mobile operator, comment particularly to the addressing of a kind of agency
System is evaluated in valency method and agency's addressing.
Background technology
Agency is that operator carries out the core infrastructures sold with service business.The quality of agency's addressing, not only
The operation cost of operator can be affected, the most also can affect operator in the in the eyes of impression of client, affect the service of operator
Quality.Therefore, to one of evaluation key job improving operator's profitability and service quality exactly of agency's addressing.
At present, evaluating agency's addressing generally by artificial statistical analysis, this implementation is the longest, adds
The big work of staff, but work efficiency is the highest, and, the manpower and materials that enterprise puts into cause the cost of enterprise to increase
Add.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is the realization side in order to overcome in prior art the evaluation to agency's addressing
Formula labor intensive material resources, but the defect of inefficiency, it is provided that a kind of agency's site selection evaluating method and system.
The present invention solves above-mentioned technical problem by following technical proposals:
The present invention provides a kind of agency site selection evaluating method, and its feature is, is provided with multiple battalion in setting a region
Industry point, this agency's site selection evaluating method comprises the following steps:
Each some distance away from each agency in calculating this region, and using agency closest for this point as this point
Ownership；
The coverage belonging to all formation of each agency is divided into the theoretical service area of this agency；
The actually used user of each agency in adding up a time period, and believe according to the user of each actually used user
Breath analyzes address or the job site of this actually used user；
Address according to all of actually used user of each agency or job site mark off the reality of this agency
Service area；
The relatively active service scope of each agency and theoretical service area, and show the real value of this agency
Evaluation result.
It is preferred that the permanent number of users in the range of adding up the active service of each agency and the reason of each agency
Permanent number of users in opinion service area；
Calculate the permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency and the permanent use in theoretical service area
The ratio of amount amount；
The ratio of those agencies is ranked up by the order descending according to numerical value, and ranking sets threshold more than one first
The agency of value is be evaluated as super agency, is otherwise be evaluated as poor efficiency agency；
The display evaluation result to those agencies.
It is preferred that calculate the reality of each agency according to all of actually used user of each agency daily service people
Number；
The actual average daily service number of those agencies is ranked up by the order descending according to numerical value, and ranking exceedes
One second sets threshold value and ratio ranking exceedes this first agency setting threshold value and is be evaluated as super agency, otherwise by
It is evaluated as poor efficiency agency.
The present invention also provides for the addressing of a kind of agency and evaluates system, and its feature is, is provided with multiple in setting a region
Agency, this agency's addressing evaluation system includes:
One first computing module, each some distance away from each agency in calculating this region, and by this some distance
Nearest agency is as the ownership of this point；
One first divides module, for dividing the coverage of all formation belonging to each agency into this business
The theoretical service area of point；
One statistical analysis module, the actually used user of each agency within one time period of statistics, and according to each
The user profile of actually used user analyzes address or the job site of this actually used user；
One second divides module, for the address according to all of actually used user of each agency or place of working dot-dash
Separate the active service scope of this agency；
One comparison module, for active service scope and the theoretical service area of relatively each agency；
One display module, for the evaluation result of the real value of display one this agency.
It is preferred that this comparison module includes a statistic unit, one first computing unit and one first sequencing unit；
This statistic unit is used for adding up the permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency and each battalion
Permanent number of users in the theoretical service area of industry point；
This first computing unit permanent number of users in the range of the active service calculating each agency is with theoretical
The ratio of the permanent number of users in service area；
This first sequencing unit, for being ranked up the ratio of those agencies according to the order that numerical value is descending, is arranged
Name sets the agency of threshold value and is be evaluated as super agency more than one first, is otherwise be evaluated as poor efficiency agency；
This display module is for showing the evaluation result to those agencies.
It is preferred that this comparison module also includes one second computing unit and one second sequencing unit；
This second computing unit for calculating the reality of each agency according to all of actually used user of each agency
The average daily service number in border；
This second sequencing unit is for daily servicing people according to the order that numerical value is descending to the reality of those agencies
Number is ranked up, and ranking sets threshold value more than one second and ratio ranking exceedes this first agency setting threshold value and is evaluated
For super agency, otherwise it is be evaluated as poor efficiency agency.
On the basis of meeting common sense in the field, above-mentioned each optimum condition, can combination in any, obtain each preferable reality of the present invention
Example.
The most progressive effect of the present invention is:
The present invention compares analysis to the active service scope of each agency with theoretical service area automatically, to realize
Evaluation to the addressing of each agency, the present invention is without expending substantial amounts of manpower and materials, so that it may provide each agency's addressing
Evaluation result, the beneficially follow-up further analysis of staff, and the cost of enterprise can be saved.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of agency's site selection evaluating method of present pre-ferred embodiments.
Fig. 2 is the structured flowchart of agency's addressing evaluation system of present pre-ferred embodiments.
Detailed description of the invention
Provide present pre-ferred embodiments below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, to describe technical scheme in detail, but not because of
This limits the present invention among described scope of embodiments.
As it is shown in figure 1, the present embodiment provides a kind of agency site selection evaluating method, in setting a region, it is provided with multiple battalion
Industry point, this agency's site selection evaluating method comprises the following steps:
Step 101, calculate this region in each some distance away from each agency, and by agency closest for this point
Ownership as this point；
Step 102 into, the coverage belonging to all formation of each agency is divided the theoretical clothes of this agency
Business scope；
Step 103, add up a time period in the actually used user of each agency, and according to each actually used user
User profile analyze address or the job site of this actually used user；
Step 104, address or job site according to all of actually used user of each agency mark off this business
The active service scope of point；
Step 105, add up the permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency and each agency
Permanent number of users in theoretical service area；
Step 106, calculate permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency with in theoretical service area
The ratio of permanent number of users；
Step 107, calculate the actual average daily service of each agency according to all of actually used user of each agency
Number；
Step 108, according to the descending order of numerical value, ratio and reality to those agencies daily services people respectively
Number is ranked up；
Step 109, ratio ranking set threshold value and actual average daily service number ranking and second set more than 1 more than one first
The agency determining threshold value is be evaluated as super agency, is otherwise be evaluated as poor efficiency agency.
Step 110, the evaluation result of real value of display one this agency.
As in figure 2 it is shown, the present embodiment also provides for the addressing of a kind of agency evaluates system, it is provided with multiple in setting a region
Agency, this agency's addressing is evaluated system and is included that one first computing module 1,1 first divides module 2, statistical analysis module
3, one second module 4, comparison module 5 and a display module 6 are divided.
This first computing module 1 each some distance away from each agency in calculating this region, and by this some distance
Nearest agency is as the ownership of this point；
This first division module 2 is for dividing the coverage of all formation belonging to each agency into this business
The theoretical service area of point；
This statistical analysis module 3 actually used user of each agency within one time period of statistics, and according to each
The user profile of actually used user analyzes address or the job site of this actually used user；
This second division module 4 is for the address according to all of actually used user of each agency or place of working dot-dash
Separate the active service scope of this agency；
This comparison module 5 is for comparing the active service scope of each agency and theoretical service area；
This display module 6 is for the evaluation result of the real value of display one this agency.
Further, this comparison module 5 include a statistic unit, one first computing unit, one first sequencing unit, one
Two computing units and one second sequencing unit；
This statistic unit is used for adding up the permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency and each battalion
Permanent number of users in the theoretical service area of industry point；
This first computing unit permanent number of users in the range of the active service calculating each agency is with theoretical
The ratio of the permanent number of users in service area；
This second computing unit for calculating the reality of each agency according to all of actually used user of each agency
The average daily service number in border；
This first sequencing unit is for being ranked up the ratio of those agencies according to the order that numerical value is descending；
This second sequencing unit is for daily servicing people according to the order that numerical value is descending to the reality of those agencies
Number is ranked up, and ranking sets threshold value more than one second and ratio ranking exceedes this first agency setting threshold value and is evaluated
For super agency, otherwise it is be evaluated as poor efficiency agency；
This display module is for showing the evaluation result to those agencies.
The user distribution that agency based on actual operation site is serviced is typically this feature overlapped mutually mutually, permissible
By the ratio between active service scope and the theoretical service area of agency of agency, the real value of agency is carried out
Evaluate.
Wherein, those active service scopes, much larger than the agency of theoretical service area, must be to possess in some aspects
Extraordinary advantage, such as: be positioned at traffic main artery, super best placement, scale effect, historical influence and storefront design etc..This
It is the value that possessed of super agency a bit, far beyond this value of layouting in the system of site of agency, is therefore necessary
Site to be retained.
Meanwhile, those active service scopes are less than the agency of theoretical service area, if not having practical reason
(being such as positioned at the agency in the new district moved in the most on a large scale), then should be set to poor efficiency agency, can be classified as preferential
The object got rid of.
The criterion of super agency: permanent number of users and theoretical service in the user's actual distribution region serviced
Permanent number of users N (concrete numerical value determines according to actual test result) before ranking in the system of site in region, actual
Average daily service number also ranking is in the agency of front N.
Additionally, also agency's service user characteristics can be shown: such as, extract user's row in agency's service area
Table, user's every data label statistics in statistics agency service area, show user's common location scattergram (thermodynamic chart, residence
Live/office/amusement and recreation common location), show number of users and statistics label in service area, and agency's average user
Served distance (walking, public transport or drive).
Although the foregoing describing the detailed description of the invention of the present invention, it will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that these
Being merely illustrative of, protection scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.Those skilled in the art is not carrying on the back
On the premise of the principle and essence of the present invention, these embodiments can be made various changes or modifications, but these change
Protection scope of the present invention is each fallen within amendment.
Claims (6)
1. agency's site selection evaluating method, it is characterised in that be provided with multiple agency, this agency in setting a region
Site selection evaluating method comprises the following steps:
Each some distance away from each agency in calculating this region, and using agency closest for this point returning as this point
Belong to；
The coverage belonging to all formation of each agency is divided into the theoretical service area of this agency；
The actually used user of each agency in adding up a time period, and divide according to the user profile of each actually used user
Separate out address or the job site of this actually used user；
Address according to all of actually used user of each agency or job site mark off the active service of this agency
Scope；
The relatively active service scope of each agency and theoretical service area, and show the commenting of real value of this agency
Valency result.
2. agency as claimed in claim 1 site selection evaluating method, it is characterised in that add up the active service of each agency
In the range of permanent number of users and each agency theoretical service area in permanent number of users；
Calculate the permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency and the permanent number of users in theoretical service area
The ratio of amount；
The ratio of those agencies is ranked up by the order descending according to numerical value, and ranking sets threshold value more than one first
Agency is be evaluated as super agency, is otherwise be evaluated as poor efficiency agency；
The display evaluation result to those agencies.
3. agency as claimed in claim 2 site selection evaluating method, it is characterised in that according to all of reality of each agency
User is used to calculate the actual average daily service number of each agency；
Being ranked up the actual average daily service number of those agencies according to the descending order of numerical value, ranking is more than 1 the
Two setting threshold values and ratio ranking exceed this first agency setting threshold value and are be evaluated as super agency, are otherwise evaluated
For poor efficiency agency.
4. system is evaluated in agency's addressing, it is characterised in that be provided with multiple agency, this agency in setting a region
Addressing is evaluated system and is included:
One first computing module, each some distance away from each agency in calculating this region, and by closest for this point
Agency as the ownership of this point；
One first divides module, for dividing the coverage of all formation belonging to each agency into this agency
Theoretical service area；
One statistical analysis module, the actually used user of each agency within one time period of statistics, and according to each reality
The user profile using user analyzes address or the job site of this actually used user；
One second divides module, for marking off according to address or the job site of all of actually used user of each agency
The active service scope of this agency；
One comparison module, for active service scope and the theoretical service area of relatively each agency；
One display module, for the evaluation result of the real value of display one this agency.
5. system is evaluated in agency as claimed in claim 4 addressing, it is characterised in that this comparison module includes a statistics list
Unit, one first computing unit and one first sequencing unit；
This statistic unit is used for adding up the permanent number of users in the range of the active service of each agency and each agency
Theoretical service area in permanent number of users；
This first computing unit permanent number of users in the range of the active service calculating each agency and theoretical service
In the range of the ratio of permanent number of users；
This first sequencing unit is for being ranked up the ratio of those agencies according to the order that numerical value is descending, and ranking surpasses
The agency crossing one first setting threshold value is be evaluated as super agency, is otherwise be evaluated as poor efficiency agency；
This display module is for showing the evaluation result to those agencies.
6. system is evaluated in agency as claimed in claim 5 addressing, it is characterised in that this comparison module also includes that one second counts
Calculate unit and one second sequencing unit；
This second computing unit for calculating the actual day of each agency according to all of actually used user of each agency
All service numbers；
The actual average daily service number of those agencies is entered by this second sequencing unit for the order descending according to numerical value
Row sequence, ranking sets threshold value more than one second and ratio ranking exceedes this first agency setting threshold value and is be evaluated as surpassing
Level agency, is otherwise be evaluated as poor efficiency agency.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610559621.2A CN106204148A (en) | 2016-07-15 | 2016-07-15 | Agency's site selection evaluating method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610559621.2A CN106204148A (en) | 2016-07-15 | 2016-07-15 | Agency's site selection evaluating method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106204148A true CN106204148A (en) | 2016-12-07 |
Family
ID=57474477
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610559621.2A Pending CN106204148A (en) | 2016-07-15 | 2016-07-15 | Agency's site selection evaluating method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106204148A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107316098A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2017-11-03 | 芜湖恒天易开软件科技股份有限公司 | A kind of automobile leasing point site selecting method based on user behavior analysis |
| CN109727076A (en) * | 2019-01-04 | 2019-05-07 | 成都方未科技有限公司 | A kind of site selecting method based on population space-time distribution |
| CN111340266A (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2020-06-26 | 中国移动通信集团江西有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and medium for selecting address |
-
2016
- 2016-07-15 CN CN201610559621.2A patent/CN106204148A/en active Pending
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107316098A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2017-11-03 | 芜湖恒天易开软件科技股份有限公司 | A kind of automobile leasing point site selecting method based on user behavior analysis |
| CN111340266A (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2020-06-26 | 中国移动通信集团江西有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and medium for selecting address |
| CN109727076A (en) * | 2019-01-04 | 2019-05-07 | 成都方未科技有限公司 | A kind of site selecting method based on population space-time distribution |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN104320795B (en) | A kind of wireless network health degree appraisal procedure of various dimensions | |
| Gudienė et al. | Development of a conceptual critical success factors model for construction projects: a case of Lithuania | |
| CN103295147B (en) | method, device and system for advertising | |
| CN103984726B (en) | A kind of local correction method of data base's implement plan | |
| WO2019144516A1 (en) | Agent allocation method, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium | |
| CN106204148A (en) | Agency's site selection evaluating method and system | |
| CN107464043A (en) | The distribution method of polymorphic type task in a kind of space mass-rent | |
| WO2019062000A1 (en) | Incoming call assignment method for attendants, electronic device and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN112348404A (en) | Village planning implementation evaluation system | |
| CN108876145A (en) | A kind of 95598 customer service worksheet quality classification method and devices | |
| CN111626554A (en) | Order assignment method and device, computer equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| Cully | Pathways to knowledge work | |
| Gupta et al. | A study on the usage of computer and communication technologies for telecommuting | |
| Habtu | Information technology workers | |
| CN101888650B (en) | Method and system for determining access capacity of machine-to-machine (M2M) businesses | |
| CN103491558B (en) | 3G network resident user analyzes system | |
| CN115860794A (en) | Refined asset cost management and service benefit analysis method and system | |
| Prasad et al. | Optimal number of mobile service providers in India: Trade-off between efficiency and competition | |
| CN108009927A (en) | One B shareB methods of marking and platform | |
| Chu | From incorporation to exclusion: The employment experience of Taiwanese urban aborigines | |
| AU2013204719A1 (en) | Method and system for aggregation and analysis of metrics | |
| Amanzadegan et al. | Application of FMEA Technique and Fuzzy TOPSIS in Ranking the Historical Contexts of Shiraz with the Aim of Measuring the Feasibility of Sustainable Urban | |
| Lu et al. | Application of DEA on the measurement of operating efficiencies for east-Asia major container terminals | |
| Dorcas et al. | Role of staff capacity building in improving job performance among staff of national college of aviation technology, Zaria | |
| Kamarudin et al. | Malaysian Water Utilities Performance Using Two-Stage DEA |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20161207 |