CN106019047A - Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system - Google Patents

Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106019047A
CN106019047A CN201610329950.8A CN201610329950A CN106019047A CN 106019047 A CN106019047 A CN 106019047A CN 201610329950 A CN201610329950 A CN 201610329950A CN 106019047 A CN106019047 A CN 106019047A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
fault measurement
line selection
line
measurement calculation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201610329950.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
顾民
葛良全
胡传皓
杨小峰
赖茂林
张晴
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chengdu Univeristy of Technology
Original Assignee
Chengdu Univeristy of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chengdu Univeristy of Technology filed Critical Chengdu Univeristy of Technology
Priority to CN201610329950.8A priority Critical patent/CN106019047A/en
Publication of CN106019047A publication Critical patent/CN106019047A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/50Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Locating Faults (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for a small-current grounding system, and the method comprises the following steps: starting a fault line selection logic; collecting fault data; selecting M line selection criteria and N fault measurement calculation methods; calculating the fault measurement value of each line (including the bus) for the selected line selection criterion through employing the selected fault measurement calculation method, wherein each line has N fault measurement values; and integrating the N fault measurement values of each line as the fault measurement value of the line for the selected line selection criterion through employing the DS evidence theory. According to the invention, the method employs the DS evidence for integrating conventional different fault measurement calculation methods, overcomes the one-sidedness of the conventional different fault measurement calculation methods, further improves the fault measurement calculation accuracy after integration, and improves the accuracy of fault line selection.

Description

Small current neutral grounding system faulty line selection fault measurement computational methods
Technical field
The present invention relates to single-phase ground fault line selecting method of small-electric current grounding system, especially relate to a kind of small current neutral grounding The computational methods of fault measurement in system single-phase earth fault faulty line selection.
Background technology
In China, most 3~66kV medium voltage distribution networks all use isolated neutral or through grounding through arc The method of operation, referred to as system with non effectively earth ed neutral.When after system with non effectively earth ed neutral generation singlephase earth fault, by In neutral non-effective grounding, circuit does not constitute loop, therefore circuit does not has short circuit current to flow through, simply via line pair Ground electric capacity forms less current path, therefore, is small current neutral grounding system also known as system with non effectively earth ed neutral.Due to this Time three-phase line voltage remain in that symmetrical relations, do not affect power supply continuous to load, therefore need not trip immediately, code regulation permissible Continue to run with 1~2 hour.Although the singlephase earth fault that small current neutral grounding system occurs does not interferes with the properly functioning of electrical network, But owing to now healthy phases voltage-to-ground raises, it is susceptible to healthy phases flashover over the ground, thus causes two-phase grounding fault, It is also possible to cause the accident such as voltage transformer and bus burns, electric cable explosion, Power Plant stoppage in transit, it is therefore desirable at short notice Correctly select faulty line, in order to operations staff adopts an effective measure in time and deals carefully with.
Due to faint by the complexity of electrical network, fault-signal and there is the factors such as various interference and affected, small area analysis The integrity problem of single-phase grounded malfunction in grounded system route selection becomes the difficult problem perplexing the work of domestic and international relay protection for a long time, Up to now, Chinese scholars proposes substantial amounts of selection method, wherein uses the method for information fusion to carry out multiple criterions The faulty line selection merged is the means of a kind of reliability being effectively improved failure line selection.Commonly used fault in faulty line selection method Estimating this concept, fault measurement is defined in the real variable in a certain interval, is used for describing a circuit under certain criterion The sizes values of the doubtful earth fault line information characteristics degree comprised.When the fault measurement of a certain bar circuit is the closer to being determined The real variable interval maximum of justice, shows that this circuit is that faulty line probability is the highest.Whereas if the fault of certain circuit is surveyed Degree, closer to defined real variable interval minima, shows that this circuit is that non-fault line probability is the highest.Presently, there are many Plant the computational methods of fault measurement, Jia Qingquan;Yang Qixun etc. are at the periodical " Proceedings of the CSEE " that number of the edition is 0258-8013 Page 6 to page 11 " power distribution network single-phase earthing event based on fault measurement concept with evidence theory of the 12nd phase of volume 23 in 2003 Hinder many criterions to merge " disclose a kind of fault measurement computational methods, write at Pang Qingle, Electronic Industry Press in August, 2010 The monograph " low-current ground fault line selection and location technology " page 85 to page 93 published discloses a kind of fault measurement meter Calculation method, Kang Yi, Liu Peiyue etc. are in periodical " North China Electric Power University's journal " the 3rd phase of volume 34 in 2007 of number of the edition 1007-2691 Page 6 to page 11 " application fuzzy theory realizes one-phase earthing failure in electric distribution network and differentiates " discloses a kind of fault measurement calculating side Method, owing to the computational methods of the above fault measurement are all that each scholar is defined according to the understanding of self and designs, There is certain one-sidedness, and final faulty line selection result is had a great impact by the accuracy of fault measurement, therefore, on State these fault measurement computational methods and affect the raising of faulty line selection accuracy owing to there is one-sidedness.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is to provide the calculating of a kind of small current neutral grounding system faulty line selection fault measurement Method, this approach reduces the one-sidedness of existing fault measurement computational methods, improves the accuracy of fault measurement, thus Improve the accuracy of faulty line selection.
For solving above-mentioned technical problem, the present invention uses the method for DS evidence theory by current existing several major failures Likelihood Computation result carries out merging the fault measurement result as last, thus reduces the one-sidedness of fault measurement computational methods, Improve the accuracy of fault measurement, contribute to improving faulty line selection accuracy further.
The technical scheme that this method is taked comprises the following steps:
Step 1, failure line selection logic start;
Step 2, collection fault data;
Step 3, M route selection criterion of selection and N kind fault measurement computational methods;
Step 4, choose a route selection criterion;
The N kind fault measurement computational methods that step 5, utilization are chosen calculate every line fault measure value, then each line Rood is to N number of fault measurement;
Step 6, for each circuit, the N number of fault measurement utilizing DS evidence theory fusion step 5 to obtain is sentenced as this According to the fault measurement to every circuit;
Step 7, choose next route selection criterion, repeat the 5th step and the 6th step, until m-th criterion calculates complete.
Information fusion is exactly under certain criterion, uses corresponding theoretical and algorithm, utilizes computer to enter multi-source information Row processes, it is achieved by acquisition information carry out comprehensively utilizing thus reach more can accurately reflect the purpose of practical situation.At source number Inevitably there is various noise according to, use different information to describe the things of same feature, it is possible to reduce this By the uncertainty caused by source data inaccuracy, the precision of system can be greatly improved.Information fusion technology makes purpose Justice shows themselves in that higher information utilization, higher fault-tolerant ability, higher precision, higher detection and identification ability.DS demonstrate,proves Being information fusion algorithm based on statistics according to theory, the feature of its maximum is that the description to uncertain information have employed that " interval is estimated Meter " rather than the method for " point estimation ", do not know to show in terms of uncertain aspect and accurate reflection evidence-gathering in differentiation Go out the biggest motility.
The technology of the present invention effect is:
The computational methods of current fault measurement can regard the measurement to real fault measurement as, owing to they all have Having certain one-sidedness, therefore they are the measured values that there is noise, use DS evidence theory various faults to be estimated and melt Close, reach the purpose using different information to describe fault measurement, it is possible to reduce this by caused by source data inaccuracy Uncertainty, improves the accuracy measured.Therefore the fault measurement accuracy after using DS evidence theory fusion improves further, Thus improve the accuracy of failure line selection.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the flow chart that the present invention realizes;
Fig. 2 is that earth fault of the present invention tests schematic diagram.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings 1 and example invention is described further, the present invention specifically comprises the steps of
Step 1, failure line selection logic start: when systems are functioning properly, small current neutral grounding system residual voltage is zero, three Phase phase voltage balances, and when there is singlephase earth fault, its residual voltage is more than zero, and faulted phase voltage reduces, healthy phases electricity Pressure raises, and therefore, it can increase to over setting value with bus residual voltage instantaneous value more than setting value and healthy phases voltage, Judging, when condition is satisfied by, fault line selection device starts;Wherein residual voltage setting value is the phase voltage of 0.15 times, Healthy phases voltage setting value is 1.1 times of phase voltages;
After step 2, line selection apparatus start, gather 15 cycle data after front 2 cycles of fault and fault, before extracting fault Half cycle and fault later half cycles data totally two cycle data, as transient data, extract after fault 5~15 Cycle data are as steady-state quantity data;
Step 3, M route selection criterion of selection and N kind fault measurement computational methods: selection 1~2 kind of steady-state criterion and 2~3 kind Transient state criterion is as the criterion of faulty line selection, selection 3~4 kind of existing conventional fault measurement computational methods;
Step 4, choose a route selection criterion;
Step 5, for a selected route selection criterion, calculate the fault measurement under every kind of fault measurement computational methods, then For this route selection criterion, every circuit has N kind fault measurement;
Step 6, the N kind fault measurement utilizing DS Method of Evidence Theory to obtain step 5 merge, and obtain after fusion Fault measurement is then every line fault measure value under this criterion.
Specifically comprising the following steps that of DS evidence theory fusion
6A, the determination of identification framework
The determination of fault measurement is primarily directed to the fault measurement of all circuits of system, and therefore, all circuits of system are with regard to structure Become the identification framework of fault measurement.
If system has L bar circuit, compile a numbering to every circuit, represent by array S (), then identification framework is Θ =S (k) | k=0,1 ..., L}
6B, construct basic brief inference function
Basic brief inference function is defined as identification framework Θ power set 2ΘOn function, if set function m:2Θ→ [0,1] Meet m (φ)=0;ForThen m (A) is referred to as the basic brief inference function of A.M (A) reflects Size to the reliability of A itself.
In the case of the failure criterion determined, the computational methods of each fault measurement just constitute an evidence body, For every kind of criterion, select M kind fault measurement computational methods, then can get M kind fault measurement.
The basic brief inference function that the present invention builds is:
M=mr·ma (1)
M in formularFor relative brief inference function, maFor can determine that reliability coefficient.
For kth bar circuit, in the case of the failure criterion determined, for a kind of fault measurement calculating side determined Method.Its relative brief inference function is calculated as follows:
First fault measurement and all line fault of system calculating kth bar circuit estimates the ratio of sum:
x ( k ) = F ( k ) / Σ s = 1 L F ( k ) - - - ( 2 )
Wherein F (k) represents the fault measurement of kth bar circuit.
Then kth bar circuit calculates according to following piecewise function relative to brief inference function:
m r = 0 , x &le; 0.15 2 ( x - 0.15 ) , 0.15 < x < 0.65 1 , x &GreaterEqual; 0.65 - - - ( 3 )
Assume for M kind fault measurement computational methods, zi, i=1 ..., M is that i-th kind of fault measurement computational methods obtains Including the maximum fault measurement value of all circuits of bus, zmIt is ziMiddle maximum, then can determine that reliability coefficient is
ma=zi/zm (4)
Then basic brief inference function expression is:
M (A)=mr(A)·maA={S (k) } (5)
m ( &Theta; ) = 1 - &Sigma; A &Subset; &Theta; m ( A ) - - - ( 6 )
Wherein uncertain trusting degree is distributed in m (Θ) expression.
6C, Evidence Combination Methods
For selected criterion, it is assumed that have employed N kind fault measurement computational methods, hj(j=0 ..., L) represent that circuit j is Faulty line, available N group basic brief inference value:
m1(h0),m1(h1),m1(h2),…,m1(hL),m1(Θ);
m2(h0),m2(h1),m2(h2),…,m2(hL),m2(Θ);
…………
mN(h0),mN(h1),mN(h2),…,mN(hL),mN(Θ); (7)
DS evidence theory rule of combination is:
1) composition rule of two brief inference numbers
If M1And M2It is 2ΘUpper two brief inference functions, then its orthogonal and M=M1+M2It is defined as:
M (Φ)=0, A=Φ
M ( A ) = c - 1 &Sigma; A 1 &cap; A 2 = A M 1 ( A 1 ) M 2 ( A 2 ) , A &NotEqual; &Phi; - - - ( 8 )
Wherein
c = 1 - &Sigma; A 1 &cap; A 2 = &Phi; M 1 ( A 1 ) M 2 ( A 2 ) = &Sigma; A 1 &cap; A 2 &NotEqual; &Phi; M 1 ( A 1 ) M 2 ( A 2 ) - - - ( 9 )
In formula, c is to comprise conflict completely to assume A1And A2All brief inference function product sums, A is assumed in so-called conflict1 And A2Refer to that target pattern can not exist in identification framework Θ simultaneously, refer to circuit h in the present inventionj(j=0 ..., L) Can not break down, therefore, composition rule algorithm concrete in the present invention is as follows simultaneously:
c = 1 - &Sigma; h i &cap; h j = &Phi; m 1 ( h i ) m 2 ( h j ) = 1 - &Sigma; i = 0 L &lsqb; m 1 ( h i ) &CenterDot; &Sigma; j = 0 j &NotEqual; i L m 2 ( h j ) &rsqb; = 1 - { m 1 ( h 0 ) &lsqb; m 2 ( h 1 ) + m 2 ( h 2 ) + ... + m 2 ( h L ) &rsqb; + ... + m 1 ( h L ) &lsqb; m 2 ( h 0 ) + m 2 ( h 1 ) + ... + m 2 ( h L - 1 ) &rsqb; } - - - ( 10 )
&Sigma; h i &cap; h j = h 0 m 1 ( h i ) m 2 ( h j ) = m 1 ( h 0 ) m 2 ( h 0 ) + m 1 ( h 0 ) m 2 ( h &Theta; ) + m 1 ( h &Theta; ) m 2 ( h 0 ) - - - ( 11 )
Then can be assigned to circuit h after merging0Brief inference functional value
m ( h 0 ) = c - 1 &Sigma; h i &cap; h j = h 0 m 1 ( h i ) m 2 ( h j ) - - - ( 12 )
The brief inference functional value m (h of All other routes it is assigned to after in like manner can obtaining fusioni), i=1 ..., L
Uncertainty after fusion
M (Θ)=m1(Θ)m2(Θ)/c (13)
2) composition rule of multiple brief inference functions
Orthogonal and the M=M of multiple brief inference functions1+M2+…+MnIt is defined as:
M (Φ)=0, A=Φ
M ( A ) = c - 1 &Sigma; &cap; A i = A &Pi; 1 &le; i &le; n M i ( A i ) , A &NotEqual; &Phi; - - - ( 14 )
Wherein
c = 1 - &Sigma; &cap; A i = &Phi; &Pi; 1 &le; i &le; n M i ( A i ) = &Sigma; &cap; A i &NotEqual; &Phi; &Pi; 1 &le; i &le; n M i ( A i ) - - - ( 15 )
Multiple brief inference functions composition rule in the present invention is specifically calculated, its method and two brief inference The composition rule specific algorithm of function is similar to.
6D, the determination of fault measurement
For the criterion determined, using the result of DS Evidence Combination Methods as the fault measurement value of every circuit;
Step 7, choose next route selection criterion, repeated execution of steps 5 and step 6, until m-th criterion.
Specific embodiment:
Fig. 2 is single-phase grounded malfunction in grounded system of low current schematic diagram, and in figure, G is power supply, and T is transformator, and no-load voltage ratio is 110kV/11kV, connecting group grade is YN/D11, has 5 outlets, is isolated neutral system when switching K and disconnecting, as switch K During Guan Bi be neutral point through arc suppression coil series resistance ground connection, overcompensation degree is 10%, and the positive order parameter of circuit is: R1=0.17 Ω/km, L1=7.6mH/km, C1=0.061uF/km, Zero sequence parameter is: R0=0.23 Ω/km, L0=34.4mH/km, C0= 0.038uF/km.The length of circuit is respectively as follows: L1=12km, L2=20km, L3=25km, L4=6km, L5=22km.
Respectively at the diverse location of every circuit (comprising bus), with different fault close angles, different voltage-phases And under the conditions of different transition resistance etc., be provided with substantial amounts of trouble point and carry out simulating, verifying.For isolated neutral system, Criterion chooses zero-sequence current fundametal compoment method, zero-sequence current quintuple harmonics component method and wavelet packet method these three criterion, for Neutral by arc extinction coil grounding system, criterion is chosen zero-sequence current real component method, wavelet packet method and suddenlys change mensuration.Fault Likelihood Computation method is respectively adopted document 1: " Proceedings of the CSEE " the 12nd phase in 2003 is " based on fault measurement concept and card Merge according to the theoretical many criterions of one-phase earthing failure in electric distribution network " disclosed in fault measurement computational methods, document 2: Pang Qingle writes, Fault measurement disclosed in the monograph " low-current ground fault line selection and location technology " that Electronic Industry Press publishes in August, 2010 Computational methods, document 3: periodical " North China Electric Power University's journal " the 3rd phase in 2007, " power distribution network is single-phase to be connect to apply fuzzy theory to realize Earth fault differentiate " disclosed in fault measurement computational methods, with the present invention utilize DS evidence theory by three of the above document calculate The fault measurement that the fault measurement gone out obtains after merging contrasts.Table 1 is several after system every circuit arranges various faults Method fault measurement value of calculation be averaged after results contrast.Vector, (x in table1,x2,x3,x4,x5,xs) represent circuit respectively L1、L2、L3、L4、L5, the fault measurement value of bus, it is interval that fault measurement value all normalizes to [0,1].
The mean failure rate Likelihood Computation results contrast of the various method of table 1
As it can be seen from table 1 use the fault measurement of the present invention, it is possible to faulty line is highlighted with becoming apparent from, It is thus possible to improve the accuracy of faulty line selection further.
Table 2 is to utilize above-mentioned fault measurement to use neutral net faulty line selection method to carry out the accuracy of route selection.
Table 2 is estimated based on different faults and is carried out the accuracy of neutral net route selection and compare
By table 2, the method utilizing several fault measurement to estimate all can effectively select faulty line, but utilizes this Invention fault measurement can improve route selection accuracy higher.

Claims (2)

1. small current neutral grounding system faulty line selection fault measurement computational methods, it is achieved process be:
(1) failure line selection logic starts;
(2) fault data is gathered;
(3) route selection criterion and fault measurement computational methods are selected;
(4) every including the bus line fault measure value that the route selection criterion chosen gives is calculated;
It is characterized in that:
(5), for the route selection criterion chosen, when calculating every line fault measure value, various faults hygrometer is calculated Value merge after result as the fault measurement value of every circuit.
2., according to the small current neutral grounding system faulty line selection fault measurement computational methods described in right 1, it is characterized in that: selected Fusion method is DS evidence theory.
CN201610329950.8A 2016-05-18 2016-05-18 Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system Pending CN106019047A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610329950.8A CN106019047A (en) 2016-05-18 2016-05-18 Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610329950.8A CN106019047A (en) 2016-05-18 2016-05-18 Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106019047A true CN106019047A (en) 2016-10-12

Family

ID=57098763

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610329950.8A Pending CN106019047A (en) 2016-05-18 2016-05-18 Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106019047A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115078920A (en) * 2022-08-22 2022-09-20 国网江苏省电力有限公司南京供电分公司 Multi-information fusion active power distribution network single-phase earth fault line selection method and system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6198270B1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2001-03-06 James William Burgei, Jr. Electronic wire sorter
CN104793104A (en) * 2015-04-18 2015-07-22 安庆师范学院 Low-current single-phase grounding fault line selection method based on multi-criterion integration
CN104833900A (en) * 2015-05-11 2015-08-12 国家电网公司 Integrated line selection method for small-current single-phase grounding fault
CN104931857A (en) * 2015-06-25 2015-09-23 山东大学 Power distribution network fault locating method based on D-S evidence theory
CN105425109A (en) * 2015-11-27 2016-03-23 天津大学 Single-phase ground line selection method with function of accuracy improvement for small-current grounding system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6198270B1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2001-03-06 James William Burgei, Jr. Electronic wire sorter
CN104793104A (en) * 2015-04-18 2015-07-22 安庆师范学院 Low-current single-phase grounding fault line selection method based on multi-criterion integration
CN104833900A (en) * 2015-05-11 2015-08-12 国家电网公司 Integrated line selection method for small-current single-phase grounding fault
CN104931857A (en) * 2015-06-25 2015-09-23 山东大学 Power distribution network fault locating method based on D-S evidence theory
CN105425109A (en) * 2015-11-27 2016-03-23 天津大学 Single-phase ground line selection method with function of accuracy improvement for small-current grounding system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
贾清泉,杨以涵,杨奇逊: "应用证据理论实现配电网单相接地故障选线保护", 《电力系统自动化》 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115078920A (en) * 2022-08-22 2022-09-20 国网江苏省电力有限公司南京供电分公司 Multi-information fusion active power distribution network single-phase earth fault line selection method and system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Su et al. Estimating the voltage stability margin using PMU measurements
CN106646139B (en) A kind of electrical power distribution network fault location method based on three-phase current amplitude analysis
CN104198884B (en) Differential principle based large-scale power grid intelligent trouble diagnosis method
Kang et al. A fault-location algorithm for series-compensated double-circuit transmission lines using the distributed parameter line model
US20170336465A1 (en) Method and System for Fault Detection and Faulted Line Identification in Power Systems using Synchrophasors-Based Real-Time State Estimation
US20150073735A1 (en) Method for adaptive fault location in power system networks
CN102590703B (en) Single-phase grounding failure route selection method of resonance grounding system based on zero-sequence transient charge
CN109444640A (en) A kind of power distribution network single-phase high-impedance detection method, system and storage medium
Cordova et al. Fault location identification in smart distribution networks with distributed generation
CN108120897A (en) A kind of distribution single-phase grounding selecting method based on three-phase current unbalance degree computation model
CN102522824B (en) Distributed state estimation calculation method based on centralized control station scheduling main station
CN109324269A (en) Power distribution network single-phase disconnection fault identification method based on distributed measurement
CN104865498B (en) Arc suppression coil earthing system single-phase ground fault distance measuring method based on parameter identification
CN109975661A (en) A kind of electric transmission line fault detection method based on Spearman&#39;s correlation coefficient
CN105785232A (en) Method for synthetically selecting lines of single-phase ground fault of small current ground system
CN104793106A (en) Distribution network line fault section positioning method based on current break rate
CN104316836A (en) Online grid fault detection method based on relative protection entropy and nominal transition resistance
Penido et al. An analytical zero sequence method to locate fault in distribution systems rich in DG
CN109309380A (en) Adaptive three_phase reclosing method and system based on shunt reactor current characteristic
CN105914718A (en) Phase current sudden change based earth fault protection method
CN103048582B (en) Based on the wire selection method for power distribution network single phase earthing failure at negative sequence impedance angle
de Pereira et al. Fault location in multitapped transmission lines using unsynchronized data and superposition theorem
Jiang et al. PMU-aided voltage security assessment for a wind power plant
Mohamed et al. A multi-agent system for fault location and service restoration in power distribution systems
CN106019047A (en) Comprehensive line selection fault measurement calculation method for small-current grounding system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20161012

WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication