CN104809311A - Structural part remaining life predicting method based on multi-factor fusion correction - Google Patents

Structural part remaining life predicting method based on multi-factor fusion correction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104809311A
CN104809311A CN201510247506.7A CN201510247506A CN104809311A CN 104809311 A CN104809311 A CN 104809311A CN 201510247506 A CN201510247506 A CN 201510247506A CN 104809311 A CN104809311 A CN 104809311A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
stress
structural member
sigma
correction
multifactor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201510247506.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104809311B (en
Inventor
贾民平
朱林
许飞云
胡建中
黄鹏
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Southeast University
Original Assignee
Southeast University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Southeast University filed Critical Southeast University
Priority to CN201510247506.7A priority Critical patent/CN104809311B/en
Publication of CN104809311A publication Critical patent/CN104809311A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104809311B publication Critical patent/CN104809311B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses a structural part remaining life predicting method based on multi-factor fusion correction. By taking multiple factors influencing the structural part remaining life into account, the structural part remaining life predicting method comprises the following steps: measuring and correcting stress intensity and residual stress of a structural part, calculating stress ratio, calculating size correcting parameters, selecting stress concentration correcting parameters and surface manufacturing quality correcting parameters, and the like. By the structural part remaining life predicting method, the accuracy of a prediction result is greatly improved, so that accurate and effective prediction of the structural part remaining life is achieved.

Description

A kind of based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction
Technical field
The invention belongs to mechanical detection field, especially a kind of structural member Crack Extension Forecasting Methodology.
Background technology
Along with the progress of society, large number quipments is all towards the future development maximized.Under such background prerequisite, small fault will cause huge loss, therefore predicts it is necessary and urgent to the residual life of equipment or component.Along with the development of science and technology, the understanding of people to this subject tired is more deep, and a series of Prediction method for fatigue life is obtained widespread use: as nominal stress method, Local Stress Strain Method, critical section domain method etc.Critical section domain method is the fatigue life evaluation method that a class has future in engineering applications.Stress standard-field strength method and critical distance method have obtained some application as two class methods common in the domain method of critical section.Then be more prone in engineering reality use nominal stress method and Local Stress Strain Method.The great advantage of tradition nominal stress method is that analytical procedure is simple, widely applicable and practical.Local Stress Strain Method, based on strain analysis, replaces S-N curve with strain life-span ε-N curve and stress-strain curve under being equipped with CYCLIC LOADING carrys out predicted fatigue life.These existing forecasting techniquess mainly have the following disadvantages: (1) stress standard-field strength method and critical distance method are mostly only for planar structure, and also little (2) using structural member as analytic target are for traditional nominal stress method, because the fatigue behaviour parameter between structural member and material sample there are differences, so the estimation precision of fatigue lifetime cannot be guaranteed.(3) estimation precision of Local Stress Strain Method is higher, but its applicable surface is narrower.
Therefore, need a kind of new technical scheme to solve the problem.
Summary of the invention
In order to overcome problems of the prior art, the invention provides a kind of based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction.
For achieving the above object, the present invention can adopt following technical scheme:
Merge based on multifactor the structural member method for predicting residual useful life revised, it is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
S1. the calculating of structural member stress intensity:
Set up the three-dimensional model of structural member, and use the stress intensity of finite element analysis software to three-dimensional model to analyze;
S2. the measurement of unrelieved stress and correction:
The distribution obtaining its unrelieved stress is measured to the unrelieved stress of the structural member of entity, and measurement result is substituted into together with the result of calculation of S1 correction formula and complete correction;
S3. the stress ratio based on segmenting principle calculates:
According to the non-regularity random load course under the actual condition gathered, segmentation principle is adopted to calculate stress ratio;
S4. the calculating of Dimension correction parameter:
According to the Dimension correction parameter corresponding to the result of calculation of S1 and the stress state distribution computation structure part of material sample;
S5. stress concentrates the calculating of corrected parameter:
Choose suitable stress field path of integration according to the result of calculation of S1, under the best total of points path being equivalent to stress slowly-releasing region, calculated stress concentrates corrected parameter;
S6. surface manufactures choosing of crudy corrected parameter:
Determine technology type, and select and manufacture crudy corrected parameter according to the skin hardness of actual measurement with the surface corresponding to structural member;
S7. based on the structural member predicting residual useful life of multifactor correction:
The result of calculation of S1-S6 is substituted into the prediction completing structural member residual life based on the structural member predicting residual useful life algorithm of multifactor correction.
Compared with prior art, the present invention can take into account all the many factors that structural member impacts fatigue lifetime, and by aforesaid operations step thus the few drawback of the Consideration that can effectively avoid prior art to exist, the precision that predicts the outcome is greatly improved, thus realizes the accurate and effective prediction of structural member residual life.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 the present invention is based on the multifactor FB(flow block) merging the structural member method for predicting residual useful life revised.
Embodiment
Refer to shown in Fig. 1, the invention discloses a kind of based on the multifactor structural member Crack Extension Forecasting Methodology merging correction.
The method comprises the following steps:
Merge based on multifactor the structural member method for predicting residual useful life revised, it is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
S1. the calculating of component stress intensity
The three-dimensional model analyzing component is set up according to drawing, three-dimensional model after setting up is imported in finite element software, arrange by stress and strain model, constraint, load applying step completes the pre-treatment of component finite element analysis, finite element analysis software is used to analyze its stress intensity after treating pre-treatment, to obtain the distribution of its stress state;
S2. the measurement of unrelieved stress and correction
The unrelieved stress of entity component is measured to the residual stress distribution state obtained corresponding to structural member, and measurement result is substituted into together with the result of calculation of S1 correction formula 1 and complete correction;
σ r = σ R - ( σ R σ bb ) ( 1 + r ) · σ max 2 = σ R - ( 1 - w ) · ( 1 + r ) · σ max 2 - - - ( 1 )
In formula: σ rfor based on the revised stress amplitude of unrelieved stress; σ maxfor maximum stress; R is stress ratio; σ bbfor tensile strength; σ rfor the analytic intensity of correspondence; W is that rich stress slowly-releasing puts sensitivity coefficient.
S3. the stress ratio based on segmenting principle calculates
According to the non-regularity random load course under the actual condition gathered, segmentation principle is adopted to calculate stress ratio.
(t is there is for one i, σ i) loading spectrum of corresponding relation, its mean stress σ mcan be expressed as:
σ m = σ 1 + σ 2 + . . . + σ n n - - - ( 2 )
Wherein loading spectrum can be expressed as σ i=f (t i), make f (t)=σ m, can mean stress σ be corresponded to mtime component t q(q=1,2,3......m).
Due to the cycle characteristics of load, choose two points on a timeline successively according to the time sequencing on loading spectrum, then then form (t after segmentation being carried out to it according to the cycle characteristics of loading spectrum 0, t 2), (t 2, t 4), (t 5, t 7) ....Namely in segment data, at least there are 2 points, make σ t> σ mand σ t+1< σ m.
Solve by formula 3 counter stress ratio again after treating segmentation
r = &sigma; min &prime; &sigma; max &prime; - - - ( 3 )
S4. the calculating of Dimension correction parameter
Stress state distribution situation corresponding to the result of calculation of S1 and material sample is substituted into the Dimension correction parameter of formula 4 computation structure part;
&epsiv; = &Integral; 0 L ( B 1 + B 2 L &prime; + B 3 L &prime; 2 + B 4 L &prime; 3 ) dL &Integral; 0 L ( A 1 + A 2 L + A 3 L 2 + A 4 L 3 ) dL - - - ( 4 )
Stress field function also represents apart from the distance L (i) of maximum local stress root by certain point under stress integration path in stress field, namely
f(x 1,x 2)=A 1+A 2L(i)+A 3L 2(i)+A 4L 3(i) (5)
In formula, A 1, A 2, A 3, A 4and B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4represent the coefficient in fitting function expression formula.Shown in (4), structural member Dimension correction parameter is the ratio of stress field functional integration between structural member and reference standard sample.
S5. stress concentrates the calculating of corrected parameter
Choose suitable stress field path of integration according to the result of calculation of S1, under the best total of points path being equivalent to stress slowly-releasing region, calculated stress concentrates corrected parameter;
Its concrete solution procedure comprises:
1) according to the result of calculation of S1, the xsect along maximum stress chooses the path of integration of reflection Stress Field Distribution.
2) get on path of integration a little, point on stress root section direction can be obtained and, apart from the respective value between L and stress s, corresponding stress field function expression can be obtained by the above-mentioned data of matching.
3) stress field function expression is substituted into following formula, solves and the nominal stress corresponding to stress field:
s n = &Integral; 0 L S ( L ) dL L = &Sigma; i = 0 n - 1 &Integral; L i L i + 1 S i ( L ) dL L - - - ( 6 )
In formula, L = &Sigma; i = 0 n L i .
4) nominal stress is substituted into following formula, the stress obtained corresponding to structural member concentrates corrected parameter:
K t = s max s n - - - ( 7 )
S6. surface manufactures choosing of crudy corrected parameter
Determine main technology type according to manufacturing process card, and go out according to the data decimation such as skin hardness of actual measurement and manufacture crudy corrected parameter with the surface corresponding to structural member;
Surface corresponding to the common processing mode of table 1 manufactures crudy corrected parameter
S7. based on the structural member predicting residual useful life of multifactor correction
On the basis completing above-mentioned computation process, the result of calculation of S1-S6 is substituted into the prediction completing structural member residual life based on the structural member predicting residual useful life algorithms 8 of multifactor correction.
( &sigma; r K t &CenterDot; &epsiv; &CenterDot; &beta; ) m &CenterDot; N = C - - - ( 8 )
Wherein σ rfor based on the revised stress amplitude of unrelieved stress; K tfor stress concentrates corrected parameter; ε is Dimension correction parameter; β is surface quality corrected parameter; N is fatigue lifetime; M, C are the parameter relevant with material, stress ratio.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: in described step S2, comprises following concrete operation:
According to the size of stress amplitude, S2.1, according to the result of calculation of S1, determines that the relation of numerical value fatigue lifetime determines the regional extent needing in structural member to carry out focus measurement unrelieved stress;
S2.2 carries out electropolishing to region fixed in S2.1.According to optimum current and the voltage parameters of the actual conditions determination polishing process of structural member, and this best parameters is adopted to complete the polishing of structural member critical area;
S2.3 carries out the measurement of unrelieved stress to the processed complete region of S2.2.According to optimum measurement method, gate time and peak location method in the actual conditions determination residual stress measurement process of structural member, and this best parameters is adopted to complete the test of the unrelieved stress of structural member critical area;
S2.4 carries out data statistics to synthesize three-dimension parameter design distribution plan to the result of S2.3, and substitutes into correction formula to complete makeover process together with the analysis result of S1 by analyzing the three-dimensional Stress Distribution result obtained.。
In addition, a lot, the above is only the preferred embodiment of the present invention for concrete methods of realizing of the present invention and approach.It should be pointed out that for those skilled in the art, under the premise without departing from the principles of the invention, can also make some improvements and modifications, these improvements and modifications also should be considered as protection scope of the present invention.The all available prior art of each ingredient not clear and definite in the present embodiment is realized.

Claims (7)

1. merge based on multifactor the structural member method for predicting residual useful life revised, it is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
S1. the calculating of structural member stress intensity:
Set up the three-dimensional model of structural member, and use the stress intensity of finite element analysis software to three-dimensional model to analyze;
S2. the measurement of unrelieved stress and correction:
The distribution obtaining its unrelieved stress is measured to the unrelieved stress of the structural member of entity, and measurement result is substituted into together with the result of calculation of S1 correction formula and complete correction;
S3. the stress ratio based on segmenting principle calculates:
According to the non-regularity random load course under the actual condition gathered, segmentation principle is adopted to calculate stress ratio;
S4. the calculating of Dimension correction parameter:
According to the Dimension correction parameter corresponding to the result of calculation of S1 and the stress state distribution computation structure part of material sample;
S5. stress concentrates the calculating of corrected parameter:
Choose suitable stress field path of integration according to the result of calculation of S1, under the best total of points path being equivalent to stress slowly-releasing region, calculated stress concentrates corrected parameter;
S6. surface manufactures choosing of crudy corrected parameter:
Determine technology type, and select and manufacture crudy corrected parameter according to the skin hardness of actual measurement with the surface corresponding to structural member;
S7. based on the structural member predicting residual useful life of multifactor correction:
The result of calculation of S1-S6 is substituted into the prediction completing structural member residual life based on the structural member predicting residual useful life algorithm of multifactor correction.
2. according to claim 1 based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction, it is characterized in that: in described step S2, comprise following concrete operation:
According to the size of stress amplitude, S2.1, result of calculation according to S1, determine that the relation of numerical value fatigue lifetime determines the regional extent needing in structural member to carry out focus measurement unrelieved stress;
S2.2, electropolishing is carried out to fixed region in 2.1;
S2.3, the processed complete region of S2.2 is carried out to the measurement of unrelieved stress;
S2.4, data statistics is carried out to synthesize three-dimension parameter design distribution plan to the result of S2.3, and substitute into correction formula to complete makeover process together with the analysis result of S1 by analyzing the three-dimensional Stress Distribution result obtained.
3. according to claim 1 based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction, it is characterized in that:
In S2, described correction formula is:
&sigma; r = &sigma; R - ( &sigma; R &sigma; bb ) ( 1 + r ) &sigma; max 2 = &sigma; R - ( 1 - w ) &CenterDot; ( 1 + r ) &CenterDot; &sigma; max 2 ;
σ rfor based on the revised stress amplitude of unrelieved stress; σ maxfor maximum stress; R is stress ratio; σ bbfor tensile strength; σ rfor the analytic intensity of correspondence; W is that rich stress slowly-releasing puts sensitivity coefficient.
4. according to claim 1 based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction, it is characterized in that:
In S3, the method adopting segmentation principle to calculate stress ratio is:
(t is there is for one i, σ i) loading spectrum of corresponding relation, its mean stress σ mcan be expressed as:
&sigma; m = &sigma; 1 + &sigma; 2 + . . . + &sigma; n n
Wherein loading spectrum is expressed as σ i=f (t i), make f (t)=σ m, can mean stress σ be corresponded to mtime component t q, q=1,2,3......m;
Due to the cycle characteristics of load, choose two points on a timeline successively according to the time sequencing on loading spectrum, then then form (t after segmentation being carried out to it according to the cycle characteristics of loading spectrum 0, t 2), (t 2, t 4), (t 5, t 7) ...; Namely in segment data, at least there are 2 points, make σ t> σ mand σ t+1< σ m;
Stress ratio r is obtained after treating segmentation
r = &sigma; min &prime; &sigma; max &prime; .
5. according to claim 1 based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction, it is characterized in that:
In S4, Dimension correction parameter is
&epsiv; = &Integral; 0 L ( B 1 + B 2 L &prime; + B 3 L &prime; 2 + B 4 L &prime; 3 ) dL &Integral; 0 L ( A 1 + A 2 L + A 3 L 2 + A 4 L 3 ) dL
Structural member Dimension correction parameter is the ratio of stress field functional integration between structural member and reference standard sample;
Stress field function also represents apart from the distance L (i) of maximum local stress root by certain point under stress integration path in stress field, namely
f(x 1,x 2)=A 1+A 2L(i)+A 3L 2(i)+A 4L 3(i)
In formula, A 1, A 2, A 3, A 4and B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4represent the coefficient in fitting function expression formula.
6. according to claim 1 based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction, it is characterized in that:
In S5, stress concentrates the concrete solution procedure of the calculating of corrected parameter to comprise:
1), according to the result of calculation of S1, the xsect along maximum stress chooses the path of integration of reflection Stress Field Distribution;
2), get on path of integration a little, point on stress root section direction can be obtained and, apart from the respective value between L and stress s, corresponding stress field function expression can be obtained by the above-mentioned data of matching;
3), by stress field function expression substitute into following formula, solve and the nominal stress corresponding to stress field:
s n = &Integral; 0 L S ( L ) dL L = &Sigma; i = 0 n - 1 &Integral; L i L i + 1 S i ( L ) dL L
In formula, L = &Sigma; i = 0 n L i ;
4) nominal stress is substituted into following formula, the stress obtained corresponding to structural member concentrates corrected parameter:
K t = s max s n .
7. according to claim 1 based on the multifactor structural member method for predicting residual useful life merging correction, it is characterized in that:
The prediction of structural member residual life is obtained by following formula
( &sigma; r K t &CenterDot; &epsiv; &CenterDot; &beta; ) m &CenterDot; N = C
Wherein σ rfor based on the revised stress amplitude of unrelieved stress; K tfor stress concentrates corrected parameter; ε is Dimension correction parameter; β is surface quality corrected parameter; N is fatigue lifetime; M, C are the parameter relevant with material, stress ratio.
CN201510247506.7A 2015-05-14 2015-05-14 A kind of structural member method for predicting residual useful life based on multifactor fusion amendment Active CN104809311B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510247506.7A CN104809311B (en) 2015-05-14 2015-05-14 A kind of structural member method for predicting residual useful life based on multifactor fusion amendment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510247506.7A CN104809311B (en) 2015-05-14 2015-05-14 A kind of structural member method for predicting residual useful life based on multifactor fusion amendment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104809311A true CN104809311A (en) 2015-07-29
CN104809311B CN104809311B (en) 2017-11-03

Family

ID=53694128

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510247506.7A Active CN104809311B (en) 2015-05-14 2015-05-14 A kind of structural member method for predicting residual useful life based on multifactor fusion amendment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104809311B (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105258966A (en) * 2015-11-03 2016-01-20 东南大学 Hoisting device real-time safe operation index determining method based on crack expansion information
CN106092787A (en) * 2016-08-23 2016-11-09 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 A kind of Metal Material Fatigue curve characterizing method
CN106844901A (en) * 2017-01-03 2017-06-13 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A kind of structural member Residual Strength Assessment method based on multifactor fusion amendment
CN107423462A (en) * 2017-03-28 2017-12-01 中南大学 Workpiece considers the Prediction method for fatigue life and system of three-dimensional rough surface morphology
CN107944138A (en) * 2017-11-23 2018-04-20 福州大学 Steel Tube Joint factor of stress concentration computational methods based on connection stiffness
CN108052717A (en) * 2017-12-01 2018-05-18 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 A kind of fatigue life calibration method based on Local Stress Strain Method
CN109115383A (en) * 2017-06-26 2019-01-01 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 The Prediction method for fatigue life of cold extrusion Strengthening Hole
CN110222438A (en) * 2019-06-12 2019-09-10 中国神华能源股份有限公司 The residual Life Calculation method and apparatus of surface peening component
CN110967208A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-07 扬州大学 Crane reliability detection method for correcting residual stress based on unit compromise factor
CN110990758A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-10 扬州大学 Chassis reliability detection method for correcting residual stress based on cis-position competition factor
CN110980527A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-10 扬州大学 Crane health monitoring method for correcting residual stress based on cis-position competition coefficient
CN114413804A (en) * 2020-10-28 2022-04-29 扬州大学 Method for determining optimal operation parameters of harvester based on local monitoring strain energy

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1720530A (en) * 2002-11-28 2006-01-11 矢崎总业株式会社 Method for predicting bending durability of electric wire and bend protection member, and apparatus and recording medium storing program therefor
CN1843829A (en) * 2006-03-23 2006-10-11 上海理工大学 Automobile structure lightweighting design method based on structure intensity variation characteristic
CN102324040A (en) * 2011-09-09 2012-01-18 太原科技大学 Methods for acquiring equivalent load spectrum and estimating residual fatigue life of bridge crane
WO2013191594A1 (en) * 2012-06-19 2013-12-27 Gkn Aerospace Sweden Ab Reliable prediction of life consumption of a machine component
CN104268335A (en) * 2014-09-23 2015-01-07 工业和信息化部电子第五研究所 Vibration fatigue life predication method and system for micro-packaging assembly
CN104573172A (en) * 2014-11-19 2015-04-29 新疆金风科技股份有限公司 Fatigue analysis method and fatigue analysis device of structural member in wind generating set

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1720530A (en) * 2002-11-28 2006-01-11 矢崎总业株式会社 Method for predicting bending durability of electric wire and bend protection member, and apparatus and recording medium storing program therefor
CN1843829A (en) * 2006-03-23 2006-10-11 上海理工大学 Automobile structure lightweighting design method based on structure intensity variation characteristic
CN102324040A (en) * 2011-09-09 2012-01-18 太原科技大学 Methods for acquiring equivalent load spectrum and estimating residual fatigue life of bridge crane
WO2013191594A1 (en) * 2012-06-19 2013-12-27 Gkn Aerospace Sweden Ab Reliable prediction of life consumption of a machine component
CN104268335A (en) * 2014-09-23 2015-01-07 工业和信息化部电子第五研究所 Vibration fatigue life predication method and system for micro-packaging assembly
CN104573172A (en) * 2014-11-19 2015-04-29 新疆金风科技股份有限公司 Fatigue analysis method and fatigue analysis device of structural member in wind generating set

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JHANSALE H R.: "A Unified Approach for Modeling Inelastic Behavior of Structural Metals under Complex Cyclic Loadings", 《CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN ILL》 *
KOTOUSOV A, CHANG D.: "Theoretical and experimental study of fatigue growth of interacting cracks", 《INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE》 *
LIM J Y, HONG S G, LEE S B.: "Application of local stress–strain approaches in the prediction of fatigue crack initiation life for cyclically non-stabilized and non-Masing steel", 《INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE》 *
刘晋川,饶京川: "岸边集装箱起重机金属结构疲劳寿命研究", 《港口装卸》 *
石光林,朱林,王汝贵: "基于多因素修正的超越离合器保持架疲劳寿命分析", 《机械设计与研究》 *
黄宁: "大型结构件的疲劳寿命预测方法研究", 《中国优秀博士学位论文全文数据库基础科学辑》 *

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105258966A (en) * 2015-11-03 2016-01-20 东南大学 Hoisting device real-time safe operation index determining method based on crack expansion information
CN105258966B (en) * 2015-11-03 2019-01-25 东南大学 A kind of lifting equipment actual time safety operating index based on crack propagation information determines method
CN106092787A (en) * 2016-08-23 2016-11-09 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 A kind of Metal Material Fatigue curve characterizing method
CN106844901B (en) * 2017-01-03 2020-07-31 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 Structural part residual strength evaluation method based on multi-factor fusion correction
CN106844901A (en) * 2017-01-03 2017-06-13 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A kind of structural member Residual Strength Assessment method based on multifactor fusion amendment
CN107423462A (en) * 2017-03-28 2017-12-01 中南大学 Workpiece considers the Prediction method for fatigue life and system of three-dimensional rough surface morphology
CN109115383B (en) * 2017-06-26 2021-07-09 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 Fatigue life prediction method for cold extrusion reinforced hole
CN109115383A (en) * 2017-06-26 2019-01-01 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 The Prediction method for fatigue life of cold extrusion Strengthening Hole
CN107944138A (en) * 2017-11-23 2018-04-20 福州大学 Steel Tube Joint factor of stress concentration computational methods based on connection stiffness
CN107944138B (en) * 2017-11-23 2021-03-30 福州大学 Steel pipe node stress concentration coefficient calculation method based on node rigidity
CN108052717A (en) * 2017-12-01 2018-05-18 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 A kind of fatigue life calibration method based on Local Stress Strain Method
CN108052717B (en) * 2017-12-01 2021-09-03 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 Fatigue life calibration method based on local stress-strain method
CN110222438A (en) * 2019-06-12 2019-09-10 中国神华能源股份有限公司 The residual Life Calculation method and apparatus of surface peening component
CN110967208A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-07 扬州大学 Crane reliability detection method for correcting residual stress based on unit compromise factor
CN110990758A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-10 扬州大学 Chassis reliability detection method for correcting residual stress based on cis-position competition factor
CN110980527A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-10 扬州大学 Crane health monitoring method for correcting residual stress based on cis-position competition coefficient
CN110980527B (en) * 2019-12-11 2021-01-26 扬州大学 Crane health monitoring method for correcting residual stress based on cis-position competition coefficient
CN114413804A (en) * 2020-10-28 2022-04-29 扬州大学 Method for determining optimal operation parameters of harvester based on local monitoring strain energy
CN114413804B (en) * 2020-10-28 2023-08-22 扬州大学 Harvester optimal operation parameter determination method based on local monitoring strain energy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104809311B (en) 2017-11-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104809311A (en) Structural part remaining life predicting method based on multi-factor fusion correction
Kamal et al. Advances in fatigue life modeling: A review
CN104850691A (en) Structural member crack propagation prediction method based on multi-factor fusion correction
CN106886663B (en) Method and device for predicting bending fatigue life of gear
Blossier et al. Strong Running Coupling at τ and Z 0 Mass Scales from Lattice QCD
CN106096073B (en) A kind of metal fatigue crackle life-cycle predictor method based on the non-probability interval analysis model of damage mechanics
Kätelhön et al. Testing and validating electroanalytical simulations
CN104281782B (en) Notched test piece based meshing gear bending fatigue limit evaluation method and device
CN109490072B (en) Detection system for civil engineering building and detection method thereof
CN106844901B (en) Structural part residual strength evaluation method based on multi-factor fusion correction
CN103970965A (en) Test run method for accelerated life test of gas turbine engine
CN106022892A (en) Credit scoring model update method and credit scoring model update system
CN107169205B (en) Iron ore classification modeling method
CN103616179A (en) Transmission gear fatigue life assessment method based on defect modeling
CN102426307A (en) Short-term life test data-based quick life evaluation method
CN106815419B (en) Online evaluation method for crane running state based on crack information prediction
CN105674943B (en) A kind of non-linear whole Deformation Prediction method of general multiple spot
CN103018063A (en) Bridge random fatigue life prediction method based on Mittag-Leffler distribution
Ding et al. An estimation method for the determination of the second elastic–plastic fracture mechanics parameters
CN112836361A (en) Method for predicting fatigue life of material under action of multistage cyclic load
CN105205002A (en) Modeling method of software safety defect discovering model based on test workload
CN103544539A (en) Method for predicting variables of users on basis of artificial neural networks and D-S (Dempster-Shafer) evidence theory
CN114398786A (en) Fracturing construction pressure prediction model establishing method and device and prediction method and device
CN105258966B (en) A kind of lifting equipment actual time safety operating index based on crack propagation information determines method
CN105912741A (en) Method for evaluating fatigue limit and device for evaluating fatigue limit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
EXSB Decision made by sipo to initiate substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant