CN104346536B - A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction - Google Patents

A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104346536B
CN104346536B CN201410649529.6A CN201410649529A CN104346536B CN 104346536 B CN104346536 B CN 104346536B CN 201410649529 A CN201410649529 A CN 201410649529A CN 104346536 B CN104346536 B CN 104346536B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
probability
failure
primary cut
point
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201410649529.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104346536A (en
Inventor
陶松梅
郭丽娟
夏小飞
张炜
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Electric Power Research Institute of Guangxi Power Grid Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute of Guangxi Power Grid Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Electric Power Research Institute of Guangxi Power Grid Co Ltd filed Critical Electric Power Research Institute of Guangxi Power Grid Co Ltd
Priority to CN201410649529.6A priority Critical patent/CN104346536B/en
Publication of CN104346536A publication Critical patent/CN104346536A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104346536B publication Critical patent/CN104346536B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of determination method that primary cut-out refuses point probability of malfunction, including S100:Acquisition causes primary cut-out to refuse the Probability p that each failure factor of point failure occurs1, p2, p3..., pn;S200:The weight of each failure factor is calculated using the method for Uncertainty number;S300:Calculate the normalized weight of each failure factor;S400:The probability and weight occurred according to each failure factor, calculate primary cut-out and refuse a point probability of malfunction.Amount of calculation of the present invention is smaller, simple to operate.

Description

A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction
Technical field
The present invention relates to power equipment, more particularly to a kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction.
Background technology
Due to being influenceed by various unfavorable factors in primary cut-out work, and its operational motion process is quite multiple It is miscellaneous, be easy to break down, such as refuse point.Breaker is controlled in relay protection and automatic safety device action or operating process Switch sends in the case of instruction refusal, and separately action is referred to as breaker and refuses point.Once there is primary cut-out to refuse point not only to cause The power outage of large area, or even personal safety is threatened, bring and have a strong impact on.Therefore, point failure of refusing to breaker carries out depth The understanding for entering, the probability of happening that research primary cut-out refuses point failure is necessary.The present invention intends by calculating breaker The method of the importance degree of different faults is so as to realize the calculating of circuit breaker failure probability.The current computational methods master on importance degree There are Grey Incidence, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) etc..Grey Incidence is easily because policymaker goes out to the subjective value difference of resolution ratio The diversity of existing result of calculation, the selection with reference to sequence is also one of difficult point;Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applies to more evaluation and refers to During mark number, fuzzy Judgment is easily produced, make uncertain increase, the judgment matrix for being given is difficult to meet coherence request, while Evaluation conclusion to each expert is set up judgment matrix and is checked, and amount of calculation is larger.
The content of the invention
For defect present in prior art, the present invention provides a kind of primary cut-out and refuses a point determination side for probability of malfunction Method.
A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction, comprises the following steps:
S100:Acquisition causes primary cut-out to refuse the Probability p that each failure factor of point failure occurs1, p2, p3..., pn
S200:The weight of each failure factor is calculated using the method for Uncertainty number;
Be provided with m expert carries out Assessment of Important to n index for triggering breaker to refuse point failure, and m is obtained by evaluating Position expert obtains the importance Uncertainty number of index j on the n estimate of index:
In formula, A represents Uncertainty number, [x1, xk] it is index importance interval,It is index importance value Confidence level distribution density function.αiImportance value corresponding to index j is xiNormalization reliability and, k for failure type Number.xiIt is a certain value of index weight;
Calculate the mathematical expectation E (A of the Uncertainty numberj), formula is as follows:
E (A) is single order Uncertainty number, wherein α=a12+…+αk,The as weighted value of index j;
S300:Calculate the normalized weight of each failure factor;
S400:The probability and weight occurred according to each failure factor, calculate primary cut-out and refuse a point probability of malfunction;
P=p1×ω1+p2×ω2+…+pn×ωn
Compared with prior art, a technical scheme in above-mentioned technical proposal has advantages below or beneficial effect:This Invent propose Uncertainty number method, represented by the way of confidence level present in circuit breaker failure it is many it is uncertain because Element, will not produce the omission and distortion of information, can comprehensively reflect actual conditions, and amount of calculation is smaller, simple to operate, tool There is practicality higher;The present invention is proposed and calculates the method that primary cut-out refuses point probability of malfunction using Uncertainty number. The method represents many uncertain factors present in circuit breaker failure by the way of confidence level, will not produce the something lost of information Leakage and distortion, can comprehensively reflect actual conditions, and amount of calculation is smaller, simple to operate, with practicality higher.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the flow chart present invention determine that method.
Specific embodiment
With reference to Fig. 1, the present invention is expanded on further.It should be understood that these embodiments be merely to illustrate the present invention and without In limitation the scope of the present invention.In addition, it is to be understood that after the content for having read instruction of the present invention, those skilled in the art can be with The present invention is made various changes or modifications, these equivalent form of values equally fall within the model that the application appended claims are limited Enclose.
Primary cut-out of the invention refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction, and high pressure open circuit is calculated using Uncertainty number Device refuses a point probability of malfunction, and many uncertain factors present in circuit breaker failure are represented by the way of confidence level, refuses a point event Hinder comprising the following steps that for determine the probability:
S100:Acquisition causes primary cut-out to refuse the probability that each failure factor of point failure occurs.
The failure factor for causing primary cut-out to be refused point has various, can specifically be divided into two classes:Mechanical factor and it is electric because Element.Wherein mechanical factor mainly includes:Contact welding, mechanism's clamping stagnation, the mechanical failure of rotation, pin come off or spring mechanical iron core Block;Electricabsorption agent mainly includes:Tight, malposition and equipment itself do not go wrong for wiring, such as coil burnout, Resistance burns.
The running environment of primary cut-out is refused a point failure and is had a major impact for primary cut-out, and for example longtime running is in wet The probability that primary cut-out in thermal environment occurs mechanical breakdown is higher, and longtime running is in spread of voltage environment Primary cut-out its occur electric fault probability it is higher.Accordingly, can be determined according to local practical operation situation each The Probability p that failure factor occurs1, p2, p3..., pn.Can be by counting the high pressure that a certain failure factor causes in a period of time Breaker refuses point number of stoppages and accounts for total primary cut-out to refuse the accounting of point number of stoppages to determine that it is general that each failure factor occurs Rate.It is 1 time for example by mechanism's clamping stagnation number of times in statistics a period of time, and this section of time inner high voltage breaker refuses a point number of stoppages It is 10 times, then can determines the Probability p of mechanism's clamping stagnation this failure factor generation1It is 10%, can similarly determines other events The probability that barrier factor occurs.
S200:The weight of each failure factor is calculated using the method for Uncertainty number.
Specifically, in order to calculate the weight of each failure factor, first have to calculate the importance corresponding to each fault indices The normalization reliability of value and.Be provided with m expert carries out Assessment of Important to n index for triggering breaker to refuse point failure, leads to Cross evaluation and obtain m expert on the n estimate of index, the importance Uncertainty number of index j can be obtained:
In formula, A represents Uncertainty number, [x1, xk] it is index importance interval,It is index importance value Confidence level distribution density function.αiImportance value corresponding to index j is xiNormalization reliability and, k for failure type Number.3 kinds of different types of failure (x are for example given in table 11、x2、x3), k is referred to herein as 3, xiAnd be index weight A certain value.
For example assessed for breaker mechanism clamping stagnation index importance, can respectively provide [x by three experts A, B, C1, x3] it is interval in certainty value under each importance degree, as shown in table 1.
The breaker mechanism clamping stagnation index importance of table 1 is assessed
Y in table11-y33Represent the certainty value under each importance degree that expert provides.A, B, C represent three experts.Then αiMeter Operator expression formula is:
Calculate the mathematical expectation E (A of the Uncertainty numberj).Formula is as follows:
The unascertained number that is contemplated to be herein expects that what the x values at calculating were represented is exactly confidence level.
E (A) is single order Uncertainty number, wherein α=α12+…+αk,The as weighted value of index j. The weight that each failure factor can be obtained is:x1, x2..., xn
S300:Calculate the normalized weight of each failure factor.
S400:The probability and weight occurred according to each failure factor, calculate primary cut-out and refuse a point probability of malfunction.
P=p1×ω1+p2×ω2+…+pn×ωn
By taking certain primary cut-out as an example, causing it to refuse a reason for point failure occurs has:Contact welding, mechanism's clamping stagnation, rotation Mechanical failure, pin come off.The probability such as table 1 that each failure factor occurs
The primary cut-out of table 1 refuses point failure cause and probability
Failure cause Probability
Contact is welded 0.24
Mechanism's clamping stagnation 0.26
Rotate mechanical failure 0.33
Pin comes off 0.17
Method using Uncertainty number determines weight.By taking contact welding as an example.Expert is engaged to be given between 0~10 Contact welds the reliability distribution under index importance interval and respective value, as shown in table 2.
The welding index importance assessment of the contact of table 2
It is hereby achieved that the importance Uncertainty number confidence level distribution density function of contact welding index is:
The mathematic expectaion that Uncertainty number can be calculated is:
It is hereby achieved that contact weld corresponding weight for 5.74. using same method can obtain mechanism's clamping stagnation, Rotating mechanical failure, the pin corresponding weight that comes off is:3.78th, 7.87,2.02. normalize ω=[0.2971,0.1956, 0.4073,0.1045]
Use formula can be calculated primary cut-out refuse point probability of malfunction for:
P=0.24 × 0.2971+0.26 × 0.1956+0.33 × 0.4073+0.17 × 0.1045
=0.2743
The present invention is described in detail above, specific case used herein is to principle of the invention and embodiment party Formula is set forth, and the explanation of above example is only intended to help and understands the method for the present invention and its core concept;Meanwhile, it is right In those of ordinary skill in the art, according to thought of the invention, change is had in specific embodiments and applications Part, in sum, this specification content should not be construed as limiting the invention.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction, it is characterised in that preferred, comprises the following steps:
S100:Acquisition causes primary cut-out to refuse the Probability p that each failure factor of point failure occurs1, p2, p3..., pn
S200:The weight of each failure factor is calculated using the method for Uncertainty number;
Be provided with m expert carries out Assessment of Important to n index for triggering breaker to refuse point failure, and m is obtained specially by evaluating Family obtains the importance Uncertainty number of index j on the n estimate of index:
In formula, A represents Uncertainty number, [x1, xk] it is index importance interval,For index importance value is credible Density of Degree Distribution function, αiImportance value corresponding to index j is xiNormalization reliability and, k for failure number of types Mesh, xiIt is a certain value of index weight;
Calculate the mathematical expectation E (A of the Uncertainty numberj), formula is as follows:
E (A) is single order Uncertainty number, wherein α=αi2+…+αk,The as weighted value of index j;
S300:Calculate the normalized weight of each failure factor;
ω i = x i x 1 + x 2 + · · · + x n , i = 1 , 2 , · · · n
S400:The probability and weight occurred according to each failure factor, calculate primary cut-out and refuse a point probability of malfunction;
P=p1×ω1+p2×ω2+…+pn×ωn
CN201410649529.6A 2014-11-14 2014-11-14 A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction Active CN104346536B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410649529.6A CN104346536B (en) 2014-11-14 2014-11-14 A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410649529.6A CN104346536B (en) 2014-11-14 2014-11-14 A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104346536A CN104346536A (en) 2015-02-11
CN104346536B true CN104346536B (en) 2017-05-31

Family

ID=52502121

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410649529.6A Active CN104346536B (en) 2014-11-14 2014-11-14 A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104346536B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107145475A (en) * 2017-05-16 2017-09-08 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 A kind of bushing shell for transformer probability of malfunction computational methods based on Fuzzy-valued

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101930491A (en) * 2010-08-18 2010-12-29 华北电力大学 Method for comprehensively evaluating measures for limiting short-circuit current
CN102289590A (en) * 2011-08-18 2011-12-21 沈阳工业大学 Method for estimating operating state of SF6 high-voltage circuit breaker and intelligent system
CN103336879A (en) * 2013-03-13 2013-10-02 云南电力试验研究院(集团)有限公司电力研究院 Short-term reliability evaluation method of high-voltage breaker
CN104091066A (en) * 2014-07-04 2014-10-08 山东大学 Condition evaluation method for high-voltage circuit breaker

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101930491A (en) * 2010-08-18 2010-12-29 华北电力大学 Method for comprehensively evaluating measures for limiting short-circuit current
CN102289590A (en) * 2011-08-18 2011-12-21 沈阳工业大学 Method for estimating operating state of SF6 high-voltage circuit breaker and intelligent system
CN103336879A (en) * 2013-03-13 2013-10-02 云南电力试验研究院(集团)有限公司电力研究院 Short-term reliability evaluation method of high-voltage breaker
CN104091066A (en) * 2014-07-04 2014-10-08 山东大学 Condition evaluation method for high-voltage circuit breaker

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104346536A (en) 2015-02-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101789039B (en) Calculation method for availability ratio and optimal repair cycle of relay protection device
JP3061429B2 (en) Combustion appliance usage monitoring device
CN107179502B (en) A kind of method for diagnosing faults of mechanical state of high-voltage circuit breaker
CN105653764A (en) Method for online estimating and pre-warning grid safety accident risk levels
CN102955121A (en) Residual life predication method and device for electromigration failure
Alizadeh et al. Impact of common cause failure on reliability performance of redundant safety related systems subject to process demand
CN104021502B (en) Electrical-network load loss risk estimation method suitable for windy and rainy weather
CN104346536B (en) A kind of primary cut-out refuses the determination method of point probability of malfunction
CN106569052B (en) Consider the power transformer reliability estimation method of real time health state
CN106655292A (en) Ultra-high-voltage AC/DC hybrid grid stability analysis method
CN104133968A (en) Correlation assessment method of power grid cascading failure accident chains
CN104156879A (en) Electric power system protection and control method based on risk assessment
Chiodo et al. Probabilistic approach to transient stability evaluation
CN103605910A (en) Reliability evaluation method for single protection device based on consideration of covert fault
CN100541213C (en) Electric network fault self-adapting diagnostic method based on element correlation analysis
CN103439596B (en) A kind of power transmission network safe operation steady-state behaviour detection method
Ahmad et al. Modified swiss cheese model to analyse the accidents
Torres et al. Model for assessing the safety integrity level of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
Bornemann et al. Probabilities in safety of machinery-Part 1: Risk profiling and farmer matrix
Wu et al. Online fault diagnosis of nuclear power plants using signed directed graph and fuzzy theory
Mo et al. Combinatorial competing failure analysis considering random propagation time
Zheng et al. Quantitative common cause failure modeling for auxiliary feedwater system involving the seismic-induced degradation of flood barriers
CN105139075A (en) Electric power system safety stabilization prevention control rolling decision method in consideration of real-time plan
Nochur et al. Alarm performance metrics
CN105929304A (en) Method for determining reverse current at protective installation place upon faults in series compensated line

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant