CN104036433A - Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network - Google Patents

Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104036433A
CN104036433A CN201410286980.6A CN201410286980A CN104036433A CN 104036433 A CN104036433 A CN 104036433A CN 201410286980 A CN201410286980 A CN 201410286980A CN 104036433 A CN104036433 A CN 104036433A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
distribution network
power distribution
index
layer
factor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201410286980.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
林弘宇
王伟
张景超
马建伟
陈上吉
孙芊
王磊
李珊珊
韩菲
雷显荣
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tianjin University
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
State Grid Henan Electric Power Co Ltd
Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Henan Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Tianjin University
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
State Grid Henan Electric Power Co Ltd
Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Henan Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tianjin University, State Grid Corp of China SGCC, State Grid Henan Electric Power Co Ltd, Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Henan Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical Tianjin University
Priority to CN201410286980.6A priority Critical patent/CN104036433A/en
Publication of CN104036433A publication Critical patent/CN104036433A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating the running management level of a power distribution network. The method comprises the following steps of: A, analysing factors influencing power distribution network effect indexes and the like, and determining the index with the maximum influence on the power supply reliability of the power distribution network; B, determining a calculation formula for each index in the step A; C, evaluating each index weight of the index system in the step A through mathematical calculation by virtue of a triangular fuzzy analytic hierarchy method; D, obtaining each index weight by virtue of the resolution in the step C. According to the method, by scientifically and accurately evaluating the running management level of the power distribution network, establishment for the comprehensive index system of the power distribution network is enriched, and the safe and stable running of the power distribution network in China is promoted.

Description

A kind of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method
Technical field
The present invention relates to field of power distribution, relate in particular to a kind of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method.
Background technology
In recent years, research and the construction upsurge of intelligent grid in global range, have been started." building strong intelligent grid " strategic objective proposing around State Grid Corporation of China, China has carried out various places the construction of a large amount of intelligent grid pilot project, and wherein comparatively ripe pilot project comprises intelligent substation, power distribution automation and power information acquisition system etc.
As the important component part of electrical network, the intellectuality of power distribution network has become the new trend of following power network development, has very important effect for the overall goals that realizes intelligent grid construction.Therefore, realize the evaluation to intelligent distribution network, have very important meaning.And the current power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method that not yet has science.
Summary of the invention
The object of this invention is to provide a kind of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method, can by power distribution network operation and management level the science of carrying out assess exactly, enrich the foundation of power distribution network synthesis index system, be conducive to China's power distribution network and move with security and stability.
The present invention adopts following technical proposals:
A kind of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method, comprises the following steps:
A: the factor that affects power distribution network effect class index is analyzed, determined that the effect class index associated with operation and management level is power distribution network power supply reliability, and definite power distribution network operation and management level index that power distribution network power supply reliability is had the greatest impact;
Wherein, the index that operation and management level has the greatest impact to power distribution network power supply reliability is PMS system distribution data integrity, significant deficiency defect elimination rate, temporary interruption ratio, hot line job rate and power failure operation telegram in reply rate on time;
B: the computing formula of each index in determining step A respectively;
Wherein, PMS system distribution data integrity refers to the ratio of all distribution net equipment sums within the scope of distribution net equipment in Style Product Information Management System and region O&M, and the computing formula of PMS system distribution data integrity is
In above formula, on-pole switch kind equipment comprises isolating switch, on-load switch, disconnector and fuse, distribution overhead transmission line, cable line, pole type transformer, on-pole switch kind equipment, switchyard, case become, the quantity of ring main unit, and its weight is respectively 0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.1;
Significant deficiency defect elimination rate refers to eliminate in time the successful ratio of significant deficiency item number, eliminates in time significant deficiency number and account for the ratio of same period significant deficiency sum, eliminates the ability of hidden trouble in order to reflection, and the computing formula of significant deficiency defect elimination rate is
Temporary interruption ratio refers to that the temporary interruption time accounts for total power off time ratio, because the timing statistics span of all indexs is 1 year, temporary interruption ratio is the ratio that in a year, the temporary interruption time accounts for total power off time in a year, be used for reflecting the rationality that turnaround plan is formulated, the computing formula of temporary interruption ratio is
Hot line job rate, refers to that hot line job in this year project accounts for the ratio of the project of all enforcements, in order to the scope that reflects that hot line job is carried out.Hot line job refers to be carried out operation or approaches the various operations that live part carries out on charged electric device, particularly any part of staff's health or employing instrument, device or instrument enter the All Jobs in the hot line job region of restriction, and its project comprises the following aspects: 1. charged exchange bar cutter, lightning arrester, segmentation and straight line cross-arm, fuse device; 2. charged vertical rod, tune bar; 3. charged tearing open taken pile crown and cable buttock line on fuse; 4. the opened and segmented load plug-in strip that installs additional of on-load; 5. living water washing;
The computing formula of hot line job rate is
Power failure operation is telegram in reply rate on time, refers to that the power failure operation number of times that can restore electricity in time at the appointed time accounts for the ratio of total power failure operation number of times, in order to reflect the efficiency of power failure operation.The power failure operation on time computing formula of telegram in reply rate is
C: utilize triangle Fuzzy AHP, ask for respectively each index weights of index system in steps A through mathematical computations, utilize triangle Fuzzy AHP to ask for the performing step of weight as follows:
C1: model level hierarchical structure;
Set up hierarchical structure according to the difference of decision factor importance, final target is defined as top, be each influence factor below top, is then the sub-factor layer of impact, is finally the lowermost layer by various forecast scheme configurations;
C2: structure triangle fuzzy judgment matrix;
To a certain factor of k-1 layer, at the whole n of k layer to associated kwhen individual factor carries out comparing between two, adopt Triangular Fuzzy Number quantificational expression, i.e. fuzzy judgment matrix in element α ij=(l ij, m ij, u ij) be one with m ijfor the closed interval of intermediate value, wherein, i, j are i factor of k layer and j factor, l ij, U ijfor being followed successively by a ijthe lower limit of value and the upper limit.M ijvalue adopt the integer in the 1-9 that in traditional AHP method, relatively judgement adopts, its meaning is:
Scale value Scale meaning
1 The former with the latter no less important
3 The former is more important a little than the latter
5 The former is quite more important than the latter
7 The former is strong more important than the latter
9 The former is extremely more important than the latter
2、4、6、8 Represent the intermediate value of above-mentioned adjacent judgement
C3: calculate comprehensive fog-level value;
According to formula: try to achieve the comprehensive Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix of k layer, wherein, α ij t = ( l ij t , m ij t , u ij t ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , t = 1,2 , . . . , T , represent t expert to i factor of k layer and j factor comparison and the fuzzy number providing; be (t=1,2 ..., T) mean value;
Again according to formula: S i k = Σ j = 1 n M ij k ⊗ ( Σ i = 1 n k Σ j = 1 n k M ij k ) - 1 , i = 1,2 , . . . , n k Try to achieve comprehensive fog-level value, it is the comprehensive fog-level value of i element of k layer;
C4: calculate level weight
First utilize formula calculate,
Draw V ( S i k ≥ S j k ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , i ≠ j ; Wherein, V represents possibility degree;
P ih k ( A i k ) = min V ( S i k ≥ S j k ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , i ≠ j ; Wherein, represent the weight of each factor to h factor on k-1 layer on k layer, represent i factor on k layer;
Then right be normalized, can obtain the weight to h factor on k-1 layer on k layer, that is:
P h = ( P 1 h k , P 2 h k , . . . , P nh k ) T ;
C5: synthetic total weight
Obtaining after weight at all levels, known k-1 layer to the orderweight vector of general objective is:
the synthetic sequence W of all elements to general objective on k layer so kfor:
W k = Σ j = 1 n k - 1 P ij k W j k - 1 , i = 1,2 , . . . n k , Wherein W kfor total weight;
D: by solving of step C, obtain respectively each index weights, as shown in the table:
E: carry out the evaluation of power distribution network operation and management level, the concrete steps of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation are:
E1: consult industry standard, according to the mark value under power distribution network perfect condition, be converted into centesimal system numerical value, formulate standards of grading;
E2: by collecting the raw data of power distribution network to be evaluated, calculate respectively corresponding index value according to each index computing formula in step B;
E3: according to the index value calculating in step e 2, by consulting the standards of grading of formulating in step 1, the indices of power distribution network operation and management level is evaluated; And utilize in step D and solve each index weights drawing, in conjunction with the index value calculating in E2, can draw the weighted value of operation and management level, can evaluate power distribution network operation and management level.
The present invention is by analyzing the factor that affects power distribution network effect class index, choose the effect class index associated with operation and management level: power distribution network power supply reliability, analyze the relation between it and Regulation level, thereby set up the concrete property index system of evaluating power distribution network operation and management level; Then utilize triangle Fuzzy AHP, ask for respectively each index weights of These parameters system through mathematical computations, finally, by the indices numerical value calculating, by consulting the standards of grading of formulation, the indices of power distribution network operation and management level is evaluated; And in conjunction with each index weights, power distribution network operation and management level is evaluated.The present invention by power distribution network operation and management level the science of carrying out assess exactly, enrich the foundation of power distribution network synthesis index system, be conducive to China's power distribution network and move with security and stability.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is schematic flow sheet of the present invention.
Embodiment
As described in Figure 1, power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method of the present invention, comprises the following steps:
A: the factor that affects power distribution network effect class index is analyzed, determined that the effect class index associated with operation and management level is power distribution network power supply reliability, and definite power distribution network operation and management level index that power distribution network power supply reliability is had the greatest impact:
The impact of power distribution network operation and management level on power distribution network power supply reliability:
If power distribution network operation and management level is high, the one, can reduce the potential faults of equipment, reduce the frequency that fault occurs; The 2nd, can repair in time occurred fault, reduce the time having a power failure; The 3rd, can reduce the frequency of power cut that hot line job brings, and restore electricity in time according to the rules when power failure operation the time.
Therefore, the index that operation and management level has the greatest impact to power distribution network power supply reliability is PMS system distribution data integrity, significant deficiency defect elimination rate, temporary interruption ratio, hot line job rate and power failure operation telegram in reply rate on time, as shown in table 1:
Table 1
B: the computing formula of each index in determining step A respectively, the timing statistics span of all indexs is 1 year;
Wherein, PMS system distribution data integrity refers to the ratio of all distribution net equipment sums within the scope of distribution net equipment in Style Product Information Management System and region O&M, and the computing formula of PMS system distribution data integrity is
In above formula, on-pole switch kind equipment comprises isolating switch, on-load switch, disconnector and fuse, distribution overhead transmission line, cable line, pole type transformer, on-pole switch kind equipment, switchyard, case become, the quantity of ring main unit, and its weight is respectively 0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.1;
Significant deficiency defect elimination rate refers to eliminate in time the successful ratio of significant deficiency item number, eliminates in time significant deficiency number and account for the ratio of same period significant deficiency sum, eliminates the ability of hidden trouble in order to reflection, and the computing formula of significant deficiency defect elimination rate is
Temporary interruption ratio refers to that the temporary interruption time accounts for total power off time ratio, because the timing statistics span of all indexs is 1 year, temporary interruption ratio is the ratio that in a year, the temporary interruption time accounts for total power off time in a year, be used for reflecting the rationality that turnaround plan is formulated, the computing formula of temporary interruption ratio is
Hot line job rate, refers to that hot line job in this year project accounts for the ratio of the project of all enforcements, in order to the scope that reflects that hot line job is carried out.Hot line job refers to be carried out operation or approaches the various operations that live part carries out on charged electric device, particularly any part of staff's health or employing instrument, device or instrument enter the All Jobs in the hot line job region of restriction, and its project comprises the following aspects: 1. charged exchange bar cutter, lightning arrester, segmentation and straight line cross-arm, fuse device; 2. charged vertical rod, tune bar; 3. charged tearing open taken pile crown and cable buttock line on fuse; 4. the opened and segmented load plug-in strip that installs additional of on-load; 5. living water washing;
The computing formula of hot line job rate is
Power failure operation is telegram in reply rate on time, refers to that the power failure operation number of times that can restore electricity in time at the appointed time accounts for the ratio of total power failure operation number of times, in order to reflect the efficiency of power failure operation.The power failure operation on time computing formula of telegram in reply rate is
C: utilize triangle Fuzzy AHP, ask for respectively each index weights of index system in steps A through mathematical computations, triangle Fuzzy AHP belongs to the state of the art, do not repeat them here, the performing step of intermediate cam Fuzzy AHP of the present invention being asked for to weight is below set forth:
C1: model level hierarchical structure; Set up hierarchical structure according to the difference of decision factor importance, final target is defined as top, be each influence factor below top, is then the sub-factor layer of impact, is finally the lowermost layer by various forecast scheme configurations.
C2: structure triangle fuzzy judgment matrix;
To a certain factor of k-1 layer, at the whole n of k layer to associated kwhen individual factor carries out comparing between two, adopt Triangular Fuzzy Number quantificational expression, i.e. fuzzy judgment matrix in element α ij=(l ij, m ij, u ij) be one with m ijfor the closed interval of intermediate value, wherein, i, j are i factor of k layer and j factor, l ij, U ijfor being followed successively by a ijthe lower limit of value and the upper limit.M ijvalue adopt the integer in the 1-9 that in traditional AHP method, relatively judgement adopts, its meaning is as shown in table 2:
Scale value Scale meaning
1 The former with the latter no less important
3 The former is more important a little than the latter
5 The former is quite more important than the latter
7 The former is strong more important than the latter
9 The former is extremely more important than the latter
2、4、6、8 Represent the intermediate value of above-mentioned adjacent judgement
Table 2 is the scale of judgment matrix relatively
C3: calculate comprehensive fog-level value;
According to formula:
M ij k = 1 T ( α ij 1 ⊕ α ij 2 ⊕ . . . ⊕ α ij T )
Try to achieve the comprehensive Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix of k layer, wherein, α ij t = ( l ij t , m ij t , u ij t ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , t = 1,2 , . . . , T , represent t expert to i factor of k layer and j factor comparison and the fuzzy number providing; be (t=1,2 ..., T) mean value.
Again according to formula:
S i k = Σ j = 1 n M ij k ⊗ ( Σ i = 1 n k Σ j = 1 n k M ij k ) - 1 , i = 1,2 , . . . , n k
Try to achieve comprehensive fog-level value, it is the comprehensive fog-level value of i element of k layer.
C4: calculate level weight
First utilize formula calculate,
Draw V ( S i k ≥ S j k ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , i ≠ j ;
Wherein, V represents possibility degree.
P ih k ( A i k ) = min V ( S i k ≥ S j k ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , i ≠ j ;
Wherein, represent the weight of each factor to h factor on k-1 layer on k layer, represent i factor on k layer.
Then right be normalized, can obtain the weight to h factor on k-1 layer on k layer, that is:
P h = ( P 1 h k , P 2 h k , . . . , P nh k ) T ;
C5: synthetic total weight
Obtaining after weight at all levels, known k-1 layer to the orderweight vector of general objective is:
the synthetic sequence W of all elements to general objective on k layer so kfor:
W k = Σ j = 1 n k - 1 P ij k W j k - 1 , i = 1,2 , . . . n k - - - ( 10 ) , Wherein W kfor total weight;
D: by solving of step C, obtain respectively each index weights, as shown in table 3;
Table 3
E: carry out the evaluation of power distribution network operation and management level; The concrete steps of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation are:
E1: consult industry standard, according to the mark value of index under power distribution network perfect condition, be converted into centesimal system numerical value, formulate standards of grading;
Standards of grading refer to by certain scale system, the standardization form that can directly compare that various raw data are converted to; Scoring scale can adopt centesimal system, ten point system and the five-grade marking system.In the present embodiment, adopt centesimal system, score is higher illustrates that performance is better.
Type and the ideal value of the main reference index of formulation of index standards of grading, pointer type is divided into direct index, negative index and intermediate value index, direct index refers to that this index value is more high better, negative index is that value is more low better, and intermediate value index is that value is at certain numerical value of centre or interval best.
In the process that power distribution network is evaluated, need to determine the zone of reasonableness of index value.Within certain parameter is positioned at this zone of reasonableness time, show substantially to meet the demands from the parameter of this angle electrical network or the system running state of its sign; Otherwise quite different.The zone of reasonableness of index is the ideal value of index.
By searching power distribution network relevant industries standard, make operation and management level appraisement system pointer type and ideal value (as shown in table 4), and the standards of grading of operation and management level appraisement system (as shown in table 5):
Operation and management level appraisement system pointer type and ideal value
Table 4
The standards of grading of operation and management level appraisement system
Table 5
E2: by collecting the raw data of power distribution network to be evaluated, calculate respectively corresponding index value according to each index computing formula in step B;
E3: according to the index value calculating in step e 2, by consulting the standards of grading of formulating in step 1, the indices of power distribution network operation and management level is evaluated; And utilize in step D and solve each index weights drawing, in conjunction with the index value calculating in E2, can draw the weighted value of operation and management level, can evaluate power distribution network operation and management level.
For example, utilize the method to carry out operation and management level evaluation to certain power distribution network, raw data and result of calculation are as shown in table 6.Calculating wherein PMS system distribution data integrity desired value is 89.45% (233552/261094), and consulting known its scoring of standards of grading is 69.80, and the PMS system data integrality of this power distribution network is better as seen, and score is higher.Be multiplied by weighted value separately by each index scoring simultaneously, and then sue for peace to such an extent that this power distribution network operation and management level scoring is 67.71 (69.80*0.20+100*0.25+32.61*0.15+23.09*0.20+96.18*0.20), this evaluates to such an extent that to belong to qualified water flat, illustrate that this power distribution network operation and management level is better, wherein the larger sub-index of impact is temporary interruption ratio and hot line job rate, need significantly promote.
Table 6 operation and management level is evaluated example

Claims (1)

1. a power distribution network operation and management level evaluation method, is characterized in that, comprises the following steps:
A: the factor that affects power distribution network effect class index is analyzed, determined that the effect class index associated with operation and management level is power distribution network power supply reliability, and definite power distribution network operation and management level index that power distribution network power supply reliability is had the greatest impact;
Wherein, the index that operation and management level has the greatest impact to power distribution network power supply reliability is PMS system distribution data integrity, significant deficiency defect elimination rate, temporary interruption ratio, hot line job rate and power failure operation telegram in reply rate on time;
B: the computing formula of each index in determining step A respectively;
Wherein, PMS system distribution data integrity refers to the ratio of all distribution net equipment sums within the scope of distribution net equipment in Style Product Information Management System and region O&M, and the computing formula of PMS system distribution data integrity is
In above formula, on-pole switch kind equipment comprises isolating switch, on-load switch, disconnector and fuse, distribution overhead transmission line, cable line, pole type transformer, on-pole switch kind equipment, switchyard, case become, the quantity of ring main unit, and its weight is respectively 0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.1;
Significant deficiency defect elimination rate refers to eliminate in time the successful ratio of significant deficiency item number, eliminates in time significant deficiency number and account for the ratio of same period significant deficiency sum, eliminates the ability of hidden trouble in order to reflection, and the computing formula of significant deficiency defect elimination rate is
Temporary interruption ratio refers to that the temporary interruption time accounts for total power off time ratio, because the timing statistics span of all indexs is 1 year, temporary interruption ratio is the ratio that in a year, the temporary interruption time accounts for total power off time in a year, be used for reflecting the rationality that turnaround plan is formulated, the computing formula of temporary interruption ratio is
Hot line job rate, refers to that hot line job in this year project accounts for the ratio of the project of all enforcements, in order to the scope that reflects that hot line job is carried out.Hot line job refers to be carried out operation or approaches the various operations that live part carries out on charged electric device, particularly any part of staff's health or employing instrument, device or instrument enter the All Jobs in the hot line job region of restriction, and its project comprises the following aspects: 1. charged exchange bar cutter, lightning arrester, segmentation and straight line cross-arm, fuse device; 2. charged vertical rod, tune bar; 3. charged tearing open taken pile crown and cable buttock line on fuse; 4. the opened and segmented load plug-in strip that installs additional of on-load; 5. living water washing;
The computing formula of hot line job rate is
Power failure operation is telegram in reply rate on time, refers to that the power failure operation number of times that can restore electricity in time at the appointed time accounts for the ratio of total power failure operation number of times, in order to reflect the efficiency of power failure operation.The power failure operation on time computing formula of telegram in reply rate is
C: utilize triangle Fuzzy AHP, ask for respectively each index weights of index system in steps A through mathematical computations, utilize triangle Fuzzy AHP to ask for the performing step of weight as follows:
C1: model level hierarchical structure;
Set up hierarchical structure according to the difference of decision factor importance, final target is defined as top, be each influence factor below top, is then the sub-factor layer of impact, is finally the lowermost layer by various forecast scheme configurations;
C2: structure triangle fuzzy judgment matrix;
To a certain factor of k-1 layer, in the time that the whole nk of the k layer factor to associated carries out comparing between two, adopt Triangular Fuzzy Number quantificational expression, i.e. fuzzy judgment matrix in element α ij=(l ij, m ij, u ij) be one with m ijfor the closed interval of intermediate value, wherein, i, j are i factor of k layer and j factor, l ij, U ijfor being followed successively by a ijthe lower limit of value and the upper limit.M ijvalue adopt the integer in the 1-9 that in traditional AHP method, relatively judgement adopts, its meaning is:
Scale value Scale meaning 1 The former with the latter no less important 3 The former is more important a little than the latter 5 The former is quite more important than the latter
7 The former is strong more important than the latter 9 The former is extremely more important than the latter 2、4、6、8 Represent the intermediate value of above-mentioned adjacent judgement
C3: calculate comprehensive fog-level value;
According to formula: try to achieve the comprehensive Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix of k layer, wherein, α ij t = ( l ij t , m ij t , u ij t ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , t = 1,2 , . . . , T , represent t expert to i factor of k layer and j factor comparison and the fuzzy number providing; be (t=1,2 ..., T) mean value;
Again according to formula: S i k = Σ j = 1 n M ij k ⊗ ( Σ i = 1 n k Σ j = 1 n k M ij k ) - 1 , i = 1,2 , . . . , n k Try to achieve comprehensive fog-level value, it is the comprehensive fog-level value of i element of k layer;
C4: calculate level weight
First utilize formula calculate,
Draw V ( S i k ≥ S j k ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , i ≠ j ; Wherein, V represents possibility degree;
P ih k ( A i k ) = min V ( S i k ≥ S j k ) , i , j = 1,2 , . . . , n k , i ≠ j ; Wherein, represent the weight of each factor to h factor on k-1 layer on k layer, represent i factor on k layer;
Then right be normalized, can obtain the weight to h factor on k-1 layer on k layer, that is:
P h = ( P 1 h k , P 2 h k , . . . , P nh k ) T ;
C5: synthetic total weight
Obtaining after weight at all levels, known k-1 layer to the orderweight vector of general objective is:
the synthetic sequence W of all elements to general objective on k layer so kfor:
W k = Σ j = 1 n k - 1 P ij k W j k - 1 , i = 1,2 , . . . n k , Wherein W kfor total weight;
D: by solving of step C, obtain respectively each index weights, as shown in the table:
E: carry out the evaluation of power distribution network operation and management level, the concrete steps of power distribution network operation and management level evaluation are:
E1: consult industry standard, according to the mark value under power distribution network perfect condition, be converted into centesimal system numerical value, formulate standards of grading;
E2: by collecting the raw data of power distribution network to be evaluated, calculate respectively corresponding index value according to each index computing formula in step B;
E3: according to the index value calculating in step e 2, by consulting the standards of grading of formulating in step 1, the indices of power distribution network operation and management level is evaluated; And utilize in step D and solve each index weights drawing, in conjunction with the index value calculating in E2, can draw the weighted value of operation and management level, can evaluate power distribution network operation and management level.
CN201410286980.6A 2014-06-24 2014-06-24 Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network Pending CN104036433A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410286980.6A CN104036433A (en) 2014-06-24 2014-06-24 Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410286980.6A CN104036433A (en) 2014-06-24 2014-06-24 Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104036433A true CN104036433A (en) 2014-09-10

Family

ID=51467195

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410286980.6A Pending CN104036433A (en) 2014-06-24 2014-06-24 Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104036433A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104408549A (en) * 2014-10-31 2015-03-11 国家电网公司 Running state evaluation method of urban distribution network
CN107767067A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-03-06 国网福建省电力有限公司 Power distribution network management and running evaluation index system construction method based on big data
CN107767047A (en) * 2017-10-19 2018-03-06 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 A kind of power distribution network regulates and controls integral system operation conditions evaluation method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102063657A (en) * 2010-12-23 2011-05-18 中国电力科学研究院 Operating level and power supplying capability evaluation method for urban electric distribution network
CN102968668A (en) * 2012-12-03 2013-03-13 黑龙江省电力科学研究院 Urban power distribution network evaluation system and method
CN103530817A (en) * 2013-10-10 2014-01-22 国家电网公司 Distributed photovoltaic grid-connected adaptability evaluation method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102063657A (en) * 2010-12-23 2011-05-18 中国电力科学研究院 Operating level and power supplying capability evaluation method for urban electric distribution network
CN102968668A (en) * 2012-12-03 2013-03-13 黑龙江省电力科学研究院 Urban power distribution network evaluation system and method
CN103530817A (en) * 2013-10-10 2014-01-22 国家电网公司 Distributed photovoltaic grid-connected adaptability evaluation method

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
孙岩: ""配电网综合评价方法及应用"", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑》 *
张峰: ""PMS系统在配网工作中的实践"", 《经济发展方式转变与自主创新——第十二届中国科学技术协会年会》 *
张超: ""配电网规划后评估方法和实用软件研究"", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑》 *
韩震焘: ""城市配电网综合评价体系研究"", 《万方学位论文》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104408549A (en) * 2014-10-31 2015-03-11 国家电网公司 Running state evaluation method of urban distribution network
CN107767047A (en) * 2017-10-19 2018-03-06 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 A kind of power distribution network regulates and controls integral system operation conditions evaluation method
CN107767067A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-03-06 国网福建省电力有限公司 Power distribution network management and running evaluation index system construction method based on big data

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Diao et al. Decision tree-based online voltage security assessment using PMU measurements
CN103942727B (en) A kind of line loss level evaluation method based on power grid feature difference
CN104484723B (en) A kind of power transformer Forecast of Economic Life method based on lifetime data
CN104573947A (en) Comprehensive evaluation method for low-voltage transformer areas of regional intelligent distribution network
CN104036364A (en) Evaluation method for network structure level of power distribution network
CN103761690A (en) Evaluation method based on voltage reactive power control system in grid system
CN104504508B (en) The taiwan area closed-loop data analysis method returned based on step analysis and small echo
CN106329516A (en) Typical scene recognition based dynamic reconstruction method of power distribution network
CN104036434A (en) Evaluation method for load supply capacity of power distribution network
CN102184465A (en) Substation energy efficiency evaluating method
CN103489035A (en) Power grid electric energy quality comprehensive evaluation method based on gray weighting correlation analysis algorithm
CN104318482A (en) Comprehensive assessment system and method of smart distribution network
CN104951866A (en) Line loss comprehensive-management benchmarking evaluating system and method for county-level power enterprises
CN103793859B (en) A kind of wind power plant operation monitoring and event integrated evaluating method
CN105184655A (en) Urban power distribution network intellectualized reconstruction assessment method
CN103699668A (en) Power distribution network electric equipment combination state evaluation method based on data section consistency
CN106651189A (en) Transformer state evaluation method based on multilayer compound rule
CN104462718A (en) Method for evaluating economic operation year range of transformer substation
CN105893757A (en) Voltage sag severity comprehensive evaluation method
CN104036433A (en) Method for evaluating running management level of power distribution network
CN103996147A (en) Comprehensive evaluation method for power distribution network
CN105956781A (en) Power grid equipment life cycle cost calculation method
CN104091289A (en) Large-scale power distribution network N-1 rapid verification method based on wiring mode rules
CN104680254B (en) A kind of power network planning scheme method for optimizing based on integrated cost model
Liu et al. A comprehensive decision-making method for wind power integration projects based on improved fuzzy AHP

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
C06 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C10 Entry into substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20140910

WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication