CN103678943A - Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters - Google Patents

Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN103678943A
CN103678943A CN201310752992.9A CN201310752992A CN103678943A CN 103678943 A CN103678943 A CN 103678943A CN 201310752992 A CN201310752992 A CN 201310752992A CN 103678943 A CN103678943 A CN 103678943A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
weight
disaster
comprehensive
following formula
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201310752992.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
赵洁
黄涌
刘涤尘
赵红生
周雨田
唐飞
王骏
杨楠
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Wuhan University WHU
Economic and Technological Research Institute of State Grid Hubei Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Wuhan University WHU
Economic and Technological Research Institute of State Grid Hubei Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, Wuhan University WHU, Economic and Technological Research Institute of State Grid Hubei Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN201310752992.9A priority Critical patent/CN103678943A/en
Publication of CN103678943A publication Critical patent/CN103678943A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of electrical power system risk evaluation, and particularly relates to a multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters. The evaluation method comprises the following steps of providing four indexes for evaluating a grid affected by the disasters according to an operational aspect of an electric transmission line; fuzzifying the indexes by utilizing a fuzzy mathematic theory; respectively carrying out weight analysis on the evaluated indexes through an analytic hierarchy process and an entropy evaluation method to obtain a primary weight and a secondary weight of each evaluated index; and synthesizing the weights obtained by the two methods, and combining a method of weighted mean obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the grid faults caused by the disasters, and form a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The evaluation method takes multiple influence factors of natural disasters on the grid into account, can be used for carrying out comprehensive comparison and analysis on influence of various natural disasters on the grid, and has stronger comprehensive and objectivity.

Description

A kind of disaster causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault
Technical field
The invention belongs to electric system risk decision technology field, be specifically related to many index Fuzzies decision method that a kind of disaster causes electric network fault.
Background technology
In recent years, global extreme climate variation causes Disaster Event showed increased, and the frequent difficulty of controlling power network safety operation that increased of Disaster Event, also has higher requirement to electrical network reliable power supply.China's disaster has diversity, frequency and zonal feature, in order to strengthen the ability of electrical network reply catastrophe, sets up disaster alarm mechanism, should the influence degree of electrical network be studied targetedly and be deployed troops on garrison duty according to disaster.
At present, disaster mainly concentrates on the statistics and analysis of disaster to electric network influencing result to the research of effect on power system.In concrete analysis disaster, cause in the process of electric network fault, its analysis indexes only relies on disaster effect number of times to evaluate explanation, does not consider the situations such as transmission line of electricity electric pressure, transmission line length and automatic reclosing, has larger defective.
Therefore, how when analyzing affecting that disaster caused electrical network, consider that a plurality of indexs comprehensively analyze, reflect the capability of influence of disaster to electrical network comprehensively, significant for the ability of strengthening electrical network reply catastrophe.
Summary of the invention
The present invention is directed to the deficiencies in the prior art, proposed many index Fuzzies decision method that a kind of disaster causes electric network fault.
This decision method has proposed 4 according to the ruuning situation of transmission line of electricity and has judged that disaster affects the index of electrical network, utilize fuzzy mathematics theory by its obfuscation, and respectively judgement index is carried out to weight analysis by analytical hierarchy process and Information Entropy, and the weight that two kinds of methods are tried to achieve is carried out comprehensively, in conjunction with method of weighted mean, formed fuzzy synthetic appraisement method.Finally, according to real data, carry out sample calculation analysis, comparative analysis can count the ability to function of disaster to electric system.
A kind of disaster of the present invention causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, comprises the following steps:
A kind of disaster causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that, based on 4 kinds of disasters of definition, affect the judgement index of electrical network ability: tripping operation number of times, unplanned stoppage in transit number of times, region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate and reclosing failure rate, specifically comprise the following steps:
Step 1, the degree of membership based on fuzzy mathematics is theoretical, by described 4 kinds of judgement index Fuzzies, obtains normalized fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R;
Step 2, based on analytical hierarchy process, determines above-mentioned 4 main weights W of judging index;
Step 3, based on Information Entropy, determines the inferior weight V that respectively judges index according to 4 of obfuscation indexs;
Step 4, the inferior weight V that the main weights W obtaining based on step 2 and step 3 obtain, obtains the comprehensive weight vector C that judges index;
Step 5, based on method of weighted mean, the fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R obtaining according to step 1 and judgement index comprehensive weight vector C determine comprehensive evaluation result vector B.
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, described tripping operation number of times NT(j) represent, specifically refer to the number of times that disaster j causes electrical network tripping operation every year, its unit is next year;
Described unplanned stoppage in transit number of times N nPO(j) represent, specifically refer to the number of times that disaster j causes electrical network tripping operation every year, its unit is next year;
Described region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate R cT(j) represent, based on following formula:
R CT ( j ) = Σ i = 1 k α i R Ti ( j )
Wherein: α ifor the weight of this electric pressure circuit, this coefficient is relevant with economic transmission capacity and the fed distance of transmission line of electricity; R cT(j) be the trip-out rate of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity, unit is inferior/100 km years; R cT(j) be region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate, unit is inferior/100 km years;
Wherein, trip-out rate is characterized by:
R Ti ( j ) = N Ti ( j ) L
Wherein: L is the length of specific voltage grade transmission line of electricity, unit was 100 km years, R ti(j) be the trip-out rate of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity, unit is inferior/100 km years, N ti(j) be the tripping operation number of times of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity;
Described reclosing failure rate R rF(j) represent, based on following formula:
R RF ( j ) = N NPO ( j ) N T × 100 %
Wherein, R rF(j) the Closing fault rate of attaching most importance to, dimensionless; N t(j) be tripping operation number of times; N nPO(j) be the number of times of the unplanned stoppage in transit of transmission facility.
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, described 4 kinds of obfuscations of judging indexs are based on following formula:
x ij s = x ij max j ∈ I { x ij } + min j ∈ I { x ij }
Wherein: for x ij, i=1,2,3,4; J=1,2 ..., k, represents that i judgement of j kind disaster refers to target value, for x ij s, i=1,2,3,4; J=1,2 ..., k, i the relative degree of membership value of judging index of expression j kind disaster, I represents disaster set to be evaluated;
Wherein: x ijwith the above-mentioned 4 kinds relations of judging indexs, based on following formula:
x 1j=N T(j);
Wherein: N t(j) be tripping operation number of times;
x 2j=N NPO(j);
Wherein: N nPO(j) be the number of times of the unplanned stoppage in transit of transmission facility;
x 3j=R CT(j);
Wherein: R cT(j) be region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate;
x 4j=R RF(j);
Wherein: R rF(j) the Closing fault rate of attaching most importance to.
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, the determining of normalized fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R in described step 1, based on following formula:
r ij = x ij s Σ t = 1 j x it s .
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, determining of the main weights W of judgement index based on analytical hierarchy process in described step 2, comprises the following steps:
Step 2.1, determine the quantitative criteria of index:
Main weights W by index i with respect to index j ijby 1~9 scale, carry out quantification treatment, based on following formula:
w ij=N
Wherein: w ijfor the weight of index i with respect to index j, N is the integer in 1~9 scope;
Index j is with respect to the main weights W of index i ji, based on following formula:
w ji=1/w ij
Step 2.2, determine initial flexible strategy:
According to above-mentioned formula, determine each factor x i(i=1 ..., weight k), by the weight normalizing proposing, obtains weighted value and is w wherein virepresent that v estimates i the weight of judging index, w vi' represent the respective weights estimated value after normalizing; Finally, calculate the mean value of the weight estimated value proposing
Figure BDA0000451471110000042
and as the weight of every judgement index;
Step 2.3, the determining of weight:
First, the weight of asking for according to above-mentioned steps is set up judgment matrix W, the element w that in W, i is capable and j is listed as ijrepresent to judge index w iand w jthe scaling ratio of gained relatively; Secondly, the geometric mean of every each calibration data of a line in compute matrix W, finally, be normalized, utilize w i'=W i∑ W i, determine and respectively judge the weight that index is final, form weight vector W'=[w 1', w 2' ... w n'], wherein n represents to judge the number of index.
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, in described step 3, time weight V of the evaluation index based on Information Entropy determines, comprises the following steps:
Step 3.1, raw data matrix normalization:
If raw data matrix is A=(a ij) k * n, wherein k is for to judge that index n is as evaluation object; Judge that index is all that large person is excellent type, obtains normalization matrix based on following formula for 4:
u ij = a ij max 1 ≤ j ≤ n { a ij } + min 1 ≤ j ≤ n { a ij }
Step 3.2, the determining of entropy:
The entropy of i index is based on following formula:
e i = - Σ j = 1 n f ij 1 n f ij 1 nn
Wherein: f ij = u ij / Σ j = 1 n u ij ;
Step 3.3, the determining of weight:
After having determined the entropy of i index, the determining based on following formula of i index weights:
v i = 1 - e i k - Σ i = 1 k e i ( 0 ≤ v i ≤ 1 , Σ 1 k v i = 1 )
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, the comprehensive weight vector C of described judgement index determines based on following formula:
c i = w i ` v i / Σ i = 1 k w i ` v i ( i = 1,2 , . . . . k )
Wherein: w iand v ithe every judgement index weights that is respectively analytical hierarchy process and Information Entropy calculating gained, comprehensive weight vector is C=(c i, c 2c k).
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, the determining based on following formula of the described comprehensive evaluation result vector based on method of weighted mean:
B=C·R
Wherein: B is comprehensive evaluation result vector, C is comprehensive weight vector, and R is fuzzy overall evaluation matrix.
Therefore, tool of the present invention has the following advantages: 1. 4 judgement indexs that the present invention proposes have not only been considered the number of times of disaster initiating system tripping operation, also consider the situation of transmission line of electricity electric pressure, transmission line length and automatic reclosing, comprehensively analyzed the influence factor of disaster to electrical network; 2. decision method proposed by the invention can be considered the impact of various disasteies on electrical network, has comprehensive and versatility; 3. decision method provided by the invention combines multiple structure power method and method of weighted mean, has both considered the suggestion of experts' evaluation, has considered again the objective impact of disaster, can objectively reflect the capability of influence of disaster to electrical network comprehensively.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is process flow diagram of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is the capability of influence comparison diagrams of the different disasters that obtain of the present invention to electrical network.
Embodiment
Be the preferred embodiments of the present invention below, and by reference to the accompanying drawings, concrete application of the present invention be described further.
Embodiment:
One, first, introduce the Method And Principle the present invention relates to:
The present invention affects the judgement index of electrical network ability based on 4 kinds of disasters of definition: tripping operation number of times, unplanned stoppage in transit number of times, region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate and reclosing failure rate, wherein,
1. number of times N trips t(j) represent, specifically refer to the number of times that disaster j causes electrical network tripping operation every year, its unit is next year;
2. unplanned stoppage in transit number of times N nPO(j) represent, specifically refer to the number of times that disaster j causes electrical network tripping operation every year, its unit is next year;
3. region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate R cT(j) represent, based on following formula:
R CT ( j ) = Σ i = 1 k α i R Ti ( j )
Wherein: α ifor the weight of this electric pressure circuit, this coefficient is relevant with economic transmission capacity and the fed distance of transmission line of electricity; R cT(j) be the trip-out rate of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity, unit is inferior/100 km years; R cT(j) be region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate, unit is inferior/100 km years;
Wherein, trip-out rate is characterized by:
R Ti ( j ) = N Ti ( j ) L
Wherein: L is the length of specific voltage grade transmission line of electricity, unit was 100 km years, R ti(j) be the trip-out rate of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity, unit is inferior/100 km years, N ti(j) be the tripping operation number of times of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity;
4. reclosing failure rate R rF(j) represent, based on following formula:
R RF ( j ) = N NPO ( j ) N T × 100 %
Wherein, R rF(j) the Closing fault rate of attaching most importance to, dimensionless; N t(j) be tripping operation number of times; N nPO(j) be the number of times of the unplanned stoppage in transit of transmission facility.
Specifically comprise the following steps:
(1) step 1, the degree of membership based on fuzzy mathematics is theoretical, by described 4 kinds of judgement index Fuzzies, obtains normalized fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R; Based on following formula:
r ij = x ij s Σ t = 1 j x it s .
4 kinds of obfuscations of judging indexs are based on following formula:
x ij s = x ij max j ∈ I { x ij } + min j ∈ I { x ij }
Wherein: for x ij, i=1,2,3,4; J=1,2 ..., k, represents that i judgement of j kind disaster refers to target value, for x ij s, i=1,2,3,4; J=1,2 ..., k, i the relative degree of membership value of judging index of expression j kind disaster, I represents disaster set to be evaluated;
Wherein: x ijwith the above-mentioned 4 kinds relations of judging indexs, based on following formula:
x 1j=N T(j);
Wherein: N t(j) be tripping operation number of times;
x 2j=N NPO(j);
Wherein: N nPO(j) be the number of times of the unplanned stoppage in transit of transmission facility;
x 3j=R CT(j);
Wherein: R cT(j) be region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate;
x 4j=R RF(j);
Wherein: R rF(j) the Closing fault rate of attaching most importance to.
(2) step 2, based on analytical hierarchy process, determines above-mentioned 4 main weights W of judging index; Specifically comprise the following steps:
Step 2.1, determine the quantitative criteria of index:
Main weights W by index i with respect to index j ijby 1~9 scale, carry out quantification treatment, based on following formula:
w ij=N
Wherein: w ijfor the weight of index i with respect to index j, N is the integer in 1~9 scope; The value of N determines or random value according to the 1-9 ratio scaling law in AHP method, and 1-9 ratio scaling law is proposed by American scholar T professor .L.Saaty.
Index j is with respect to the main weights W of index i ji, based on following formula:
w ji=1/w ij
Step 2.2, determine initial flexible strategy:
According to above-mentioned formula, determine each factor x i(i=1 ..., weight k), by the weight normalizing proposing, obtains weighted value and is
Figure BDA0000451471110000081
w wherein virepresent that v estimates i the weight of judging index, w vi' represent the respective weights estimated value after normalizing; Finally, calculate the mean value of the weight estimated value proposing
Figure BDA0000451471110000082
and as the weight of every judgement index;
Step 2.3, the determining of weight:
First, the weight of asking for according to above-mentioned steps is set up judgment matrix W, the element w that in W, i is capable and j is listed as ijrepresent to judge index w iand w jthe scaling ratio of gained relatively; Secondly, the geometric mean of every each calibration data of a line in compute matrix W,
Figure BDA0000451471110000083
finally, be normalized, utilize w i'=W i/ ∑ W i, determine and respectively judge the weight that index is final, form weight vector W'=[w 1', w 2' ... w n'], wherein n represents to judge the number of index.
(3) step 3, based on Information Entropy, determines the inferior weight V that respectively judges index according to 4 of obfuscation indexs; Comprise the following steps:
Step 3.1, raw data matrix normalization:
If raw data matrix is A=(a ij) k * n, wherein k is for to judge that index n is as evaluation object; Judge that index is all that large person is excellent type, obtains normalization matrix based on following formula for 4:
u ij = a ij max 1 ≤ j ≤ n { a ij } + min 1 ≤ j ≤ n { a ij }
Step 3.2, the determining of entropy:
The entropy of i index is based on following formula:
e i = - Σ j = 1 n f ij 1 n f ij 1 nn
Wherein: f ij = u ij / Σ j = 1 n u ij ;
Step 3.3, the determining of weight:
After having determined the entropy of i index, the determining based on following formula of i index weights:
v i = 1 - e i k - Σ i = 1 k e i ( 0 ≤ v i ≤ 1 , Σ 1 k v i = 1 )
(4) step 4, the inferior weight V that the main weights W obtaining based on step 2 and step 3 obtain, obtains the comprehensive weight vector C that judges index; Based on following formula:
c i = w i ` v i / Σ i = 1 k w i ` v i ( i = 1,2 , . . . . k )
Wherein: w iand v ithe every judgement index weights that is respectively analytical hierarchy process and Information Entropy calculating gained, comprehensive weight vector is C=(c i, c 2c k).
(5) step 5, based on method of weighted mean, the fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R obtaining according to step 1 and judge that index comprehensive weight vector C determines comprehensive evaluation result vector B, based on following formula:
B=C·R
Wherein: B is comprehensive evaluation result vector, C is comprehensive weight vector, and R is fuzzy overall evaluation matrix.
Two, be a concrete case that adopts said method below:
According to 2009 to 2011 circuit operational reports of national grid, arrange out and comprise that thunder and lightning, icing, bird pest, strong wind, filth and six kinds of disaster related datas of mountain fire, region have covered all regions that China economizes except Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan and Hai Nanwu.With reference to larger 4 kinds of the alternating current circuits electric pressure of transmission line capability, and calculate weighted value according to their maximum delivery capacity and maximum delivery distance, as shown in table 2, and calculate according to this region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate.Within 2009~2011 years, six kinds of disasters are large to China
The judgement desired value that some areas impact is as shown in table 3.
Each grade transmission line of electricity weight reference table of table 2
2009~2011 years six kinds of China most areas disasters of table 3 are judged desired value
1) according to the step of comprehensive evaluation, want to judge desired value obfuscation by 4 of six kinds of disasters, the data obtained is in Table 4.
Table 4 is judged the obfuscation matrix of index
2), first according to analytical hierarchy process, with reference to evaluation expert's suggestion, try to achieve subjective weight as follows:
W'=(0.224211,0.259772,0.265448,0.250569)
Then according to Information Entropy, with reference to the raw data of judging index shown in table 3, try to achieve objective weight as follows:
V=(0.222845,0.256302,0.255035,0.265817)
Finally, according to formula (11), obtain comprehensive weight as follows:
C=(0.199181,0.26542,0.269878,0.265521)
3) draw and evaluate disaster to affect the comprehensive evaluation vector of electrical network ability as follows:
B=(0.723581,0.566729,0.177154,0.386284,0.109377,0.355372)
According to comprehensive evaluation vector, show that six kinds of disasters affect the contrast of electrical network ability, as shown in Figure 2.
From the preferred embodiment providing, to the application note of decision method that the present invention carries, can find out, according to implementation step provided by the present invention, by proposing 4, judge that disaster affects the index of electrical network, utilize fuzzy mathematics theory by its obfuscation, and respectively judgement index is carried out to weight analysis by analytical hierarchy process and Information Entropy, and the weight that two kinds of methods are tried to achieve is carried out comprehensively, in conjunction with method of weighted mean, having obtained disaster affects the comprehensive evaluation vector of electrical network ability, has reflected the capability of influence of disaster to electrical network comprehensively.
Specific embodiment described herein is only to the explanation for example of the present invention's spirit.Those skilled in the art can make various modifications or supplement or adopt similar mode to substitute described specific embodiment, but can't depart from spirit of the present invention or surmount the defined scope of appended claims.

Claims (7)

1. a disaster causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that, based on 4 kinds of disasters of definition, affect the judgement index of electrical network ability: tripping operation number of times, unplanned stoppage in transit number of times, region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate and reclosing failure rate, specifically comprise the following steps:
Step 1, the degree of membership based on fuzzy mathematics is theoretical, by described 4 kinds of judgement index Fuzzies, obtains normalized fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R;
Step 2, based on analytical hierarchy process, determines above-mentioned 4 main weights W of judging index;
Step 3, based on Information Entropy, determines the inferior weight V that respectively judges index according to 4 of obfuscation indexs;
Step 4, the inferior weight V that the main weights W obtaining based on step 2 and step 3 obtain, obtains the comprehensive weight vector C that judges index;
Step 5, based on method of weighted mean, the fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R obtaining according to step 1 and judgement index comprehensive weight vector C determine comprehensive evaluation result vector B.
2. a kind of disaster according to claim 1 causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that,
Described tripping operation number of times N t(j) represent, specifically refer to the number of times that disaster j causes electrical network tripping operation every year, its unit is next year;
Described unplanned stoppage in transit number of times N nPO(j) represent, specifically refer to the number of times that disaster j causes electrical network tripping operation every year, its unit is next year;
Described region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate R cT(j) represent, based on following formula:
R CT ( j ) = Σ i = 1 k α i R Ti ( j )
Wherein: α ifor the weight of this electric pressure circuit, this coefficient is relevant with economic transmission capacity and the fed distance of transmission line of electricity; R cT(j) be the trip-out rate of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity, unit is inferior/100 km years; R cT(j) be region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate, unit is inferior/100 km years;
Wherein, trip-out rate is characterized by:
R Ti ( j ) = N Ti ( j ) L
Wherein: L is the length of specific voltage grade transmission line of electricity, unit was 100 km years, R ti(j) be the trip-out rate of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity, unit is inferior/100 km years, N ti(j) be the tripping operation number of times of this electric pressure transmission line of electricity;
Described reclosing failure rate R rF(j) represent, based on following formula:
R RF ( j ) = N NPO ( j ) N T × 100 %
Wherein, R rF(j) the Closing fault rate of attaching most importance to, dimensionless; N t(j) be tripping operation number of times; N nPO(j) be the number of times of the unplanned stoppage in transit of transmission facility.
3. a kind of disaster according to claim 2 causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that, described 4 kinds of obfuscations of judging indexs are based on following formula:
x ij s = x ij max j ∈ I { x ij } + min j ∈ I { x ij }
Wherein: for x ij, i=1,2,3,4; J=1,2 ..., k, represents that i judgement of j kind disaster refers to target value, for x ij s, i=1,2,3,4; J=1,2 ..., k, i the relative degree of membership value of judging index of expression j kind disaster, I represents disaster set to be evaluated;
Wherein: x ijwith the above-mentioned 4 kinds relations of judging indexs, based on following formula:
x 1j=N T(j);
Wherein: N t(j) be tripping operation number of times;
x 2j=N NPO(j);
Wherein: N nPO(j) be the number of times of the unplanned stoppage in transit of transmission facility;
x 3j=R CT(j);
Wherein: R cT(j) be region power transmission line comprehensive trip-out rate;
x 4j=R RF(j);
Wherein: R rF(j) the Closing fault rate of attaching most importance to.
4. a kind of disaster according to claim 3 causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that, and the determining of normalized fuzzy overall evaluation matrix R in described step 1, based on following formula:
r ij = x ij s Σ t = 1 j x it s .
5. a kind of disaster according to claim 4 causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that, determining of the main weights W of judgement index based on analytical hierarchy process in described step 2, comprises the following steps:
Step 2.1, determine the quantitative criteria of index:
Main weights W by index i with respect to index j ijby 1~9 scale, carry out quantification treatment, based on following formula:
w ij=N
Wherein: w ijfor the weight of index i with respect to index j, N is the integer in 1~9 scope;
Index j is with respect to the main weights W of index i ji, based on following formula:
w ji=1/w ij
Step 2.2, determine initial flexible strategy:
According to above-mentioned formula, determine each factor x i(i=1 ..., weight k), by the weight normalizing proposing, obtains weighted value and is
Figure FDA0000451471100000032
w wherein virepresent that v estimates i the weight of judging index, w vi' represent the respective weights estimated value after normalizing; Finally, calculate the mean value of the weight estimated value proposing
Figure FDA0000451471100000033
and as the weight of every judgement index;
Step 2.3, the determining of weight:
First, the weight of asking for according to above-mentioned steps is set up judgment matrix W, the element w that in W, i is capable and j is listed as ijrepresent to judge index w iand w jthe scaling ratio of gained relatively; Secondly, the geometric mean of every each calibration data of a line in compute matrix W,
Figure FDA0000451471100000041
finally, be normalized, utilize w i'=W i/ ∑ W i, determine and respectively judge the weight that index is final, form weight vector W'=[w 1', w 2' ... w n'], wherein n represents to judge the number of index.
6. a kind of disaster according to claim 4 causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that, in described step 3, time weight V of the evaluation index based on Information Entropy determines, comprises the following steps:
Step 3.1, raw data matrix normalization:
If raw data matrix is A=(a ij) k * n, wherein k is for to judge that index n is as evaluation object; Judge that index is all that large person is excellent type, obtains normalization matrix based on following formula for 4:
u ij = a ij max 1 ≤ j ≤ n { a ij } + min 1 ≤ j ≤ n { a ij }
Step 3.2, the determining of entropy:
The entropy of i index is based on following formula:
e i = - Σ j = 1 n f ij 1 n f ij 1 nn
Wherein: f ij = u ij / Σ j = 1 n u ij ;
Step 3.3, the determining of weight:
After having determined the entropy of i index, the determining based on following formula of i index weights:
v i = 1 - e i k - Σ i = 1 k e i ( 0 ≤ v i ≤ 1 , Σ 1 k v i = 1 )
In above-mentioned a kind of disaster, cause many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, the comprehensive weight vector C of described judgement index determines based on following formula:
c i = w i ` v i / Σ i = 1 k w i ` v i ( i = 1,2 , . . . . k )
Wherein: w iand v ithe every judgement index weights that is respectively analytical hierarchy process and Information Entropy calculating gained, comprehensive weight vector is C=(c i, c 2c k).
7. a kind of disaster according to claim 4 causes many index Fuzzies decision method of electric network fault, it is characterized in that the determining based on following formula of the described comprehensive evaluation result vector based on method of weighted mean:
B=C·R
Wherein: B is comprehensive evaluation result vector, C is comprehensive weight vector, and R is fuzzy overall evaluation matrix.
CN201310752992.9A 2013-12-31 2013-12-31 Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters Pending CN103678943A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310752992.9A CN103678943A (en) 2013-12-31 2013-12-31 Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310752992.9A CN103678943A (en) 2013-12-31 2013-12-31 Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN103678943A true CN103678943A (en) 2014-03-26

Family

ID=50316473

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201310752992.9A Pending CN103678943A (en) 2013-12-31 2013-12-31 Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN103678943A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103955613A (en) * 2014-04-29 2014-07-30 国家电网公司 Evaluating method for regional landslide geological disaster risk grading of power grid project
CN105488308A (en) * 2016-01-20 2016-04-13 国家电网公司 Multi-scale comprehensive analysis method for influence of disasters on electrical grid
CN105956934A (en) * 2016-05-05 2016-09-21 国网湖南省电力公司防灾减灾中心 Power grid forest fire and icing disaster safety evaluation method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach
CN105975735A (en) * 2016-07-19 2016-09-28 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Modeling method for assessing health state of power equipment
CN107092993A (en) * 2017-06-05 2017-08-25 国网陕西省电力公司电力科学研究院 Reclosing success rate association analysis method based on Disasters Type and line information
CN107273703A (en) * 2017-07-11 2017-10-20 河南省交通规划设计研究院股份有限公司 A kind of Pavement Condition distribution situation Forecasting Methodology
CN107292478A (en) * 2016-04-13 2017-10-24 中国电力科学研究院 A kind of disaster influences the acquisition methods of situation on power distribution network
CN107742040A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-02-27 广东电网有限责任公司惠州供电局 A kind of power transmission line comprehensive methods of risk assessment based on TOPSIS and optimum combination weight
CN109521343A (en) * 2018-12-29 2019-03-26 广东电网有限责任公司 A kind of appraisal procedure for drawing Reatta protection scope
CN110298523A (en) * 2018-03-22 2019-10-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of oil-gas gathering and transportation station library lightning protection comprehensive ability evaluation method
CN110782147A (en) * 2019-10-18 2020-02-11 武汉大学 Fuzzy Petri network-based oil spill disaster chain risk analysis method
CN112348391A (en) * 2020-11-18 2021-02-09 贵州省气象灾害防御技术中心 Regional lightning disaster risk assessment method
CN115510669A (en) * 2022-10-11 2022-12-23 昆明理工大学 Power transmission line seismic loss assessment method based on GIS fuzzy analysis

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006034200A2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-30 Educational Testing Service Method and system for the automatic generation of speech features for scoring high entropy speech
CN102565297A (en) * 2012-01-06 2012-07-11 浙江大学 Surface water quality evaluation method based on combined weight
CN102682218A (en) * 2012-05-17 2012-09-19 广西电网公司电力科学研究院 Method for evaluating electricity energy efficiency of industrial user
CN103439593A (en) * 2013-07-31 2013-12-11 国家电网公司 Distributed power grid risk assessment system and distributed power grid risk assessment method based on fault feature of electric circuit

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006034200A2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-30 Educational Testing Service Method and system for the automatic generation of speech features for scoring high entropy speech
CN102565297A (en) * 2012-01-06 2012-07-11 浙江大学 Surface water quality evaluation method based on combined weight
CN102682218A (en) * 2012-05-17 2012-09-19 广西电网公司电力科学研究院 Method for evaluating electricity energy efficiency of industrial user
CN103439593A (en) * 2013-07-31 2013-12-11 国家电网公司 Distributed power grid risk assessment system and distributed power grid risk assessment method based on fault feature of electric circuit

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
刘杨 等;: "《基于层次分析法和熵值法的产品广义质量综合评价方法》", 《中国工程机械学报》, vol. 7, no. 4, 31 December 2009 (2009-12-31) *
周雨田 等;: "《自然灾害造成电网故障的地域分布评估研究》", 《陕西电力》, no. 10, 29 November 2013 (2013-11-29) *

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103955613B (en) * 2014-04-29 2015-08-19 国家电网公司 A kind of electricity power engineering regional Landslide Hazards grade of risk evaluation method
CN103955613A (en) * 2014-04-29 2014-07-30 国家电网公司 Evaluating method for regional landslide geological disaster risk grading of power grid project
CN105488308B (en) * 2016-01-20 2019-05-24 国家电网公司 A kind of disaster influences the multi-scale generalization analysis method of power grid
CN105488308A (en) * 2016-01-20 2016-04-13 国家电网公司 Multi-scale comprehensive analysis method for influence of disasters on electrical grid
CN107292478B (en) * 2016-04-13 2022-08-09 中国电力科学研究院 Method for acquiring influence situation of disaster on power distribution network
CN107292478A (en) * 2016-04-13 2017-10-24 中国电力科学研究院 A kind of disaster influences the acquisition methods of situation on power distribution network
CN105956934A (en) * 2016-05-05 2016-09-21 国网湖南省电力公司防灾减灾中心 Power grid forest fire and icing disaster safety evaluation method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach
CN105975735A (en) * 2016-07-19 2016-09-28 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Modeling method for assessing health state of power equipment
CN105975735B (en) * 2016-07-19 2019-06-11 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 A kind of modeling method for power equipment health state evaluation
CN107092993A (en) * 2017-06-05 2017-08-25 国网陕西省电力公司电力科学研究院 Reclosing success rate association analysis method based on Disasters Type and line information
CN107273703B (en) * 2017-07-11 2020-02-07 河南省交通规划设计研究院股份有限公司 Pavement service performance distribution condition prediction method
CN107273703A (en) * 2017-07-11 2017-10-20 河南省交通规划设计研究院股份有限公司 A kind of Pavement Condition distribution situation Forecasting Methodology
CN107742040A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-02-27 广东电网有限责任公司惠州供电局 A kind of power transmission line comprehensive methods of risk assessment based on TOPSIS and optimum combination weight
CN110298523A (en) * 2018-03-22 2019-10-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of oil-gas gathering and transportation station library lightning protection comprehensive ability evaluation method
CN109521343A (en) * 2018-12-29 2019-03-26 广东电网有限责任公司 A kind of appraisal procedure for drawing Reatta protection scope
CN109521343B (en) * 2018-12-29 2020-11-10 广东电网有限责任公司 Method for evaluating lightning-induced tower protection range
CN110782147A (en) * 2019-10-18 2020-02-11 武汉大学 Fuzzy Petri network-based oil spill disaster chain risk analysis method
CN110782147B (en) * 2019-10-18 2022-06-14 武汉大学 Fuzzy Petri network-based oil spill disaster chain risk analysis method
CN112348391A (en) * 2020-11-18 2021-02-09 贵州省气象灾害防御技术中心 Regional lightning disaster risk assessment method
CN115510669A (en) * 2022-10-11 2022-12-23 昆明理工大学 Power transmission line seismic loss assessment method based on GIS fuzzy analysis

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103678943A (en) Multi-index fuzzy evaluation method for grid faults caused by disasters
US9239816B2 (en) Method of power system preventive control candidate measures identification self-adaptive to external environment
CN102289590B (en) Method for estimating operating state of SF6 high-voltage circuit breaker and intelligent system
CN104063750B (en) The Forecasting Methodology of the disaster-stricken influence of power system based on the anti-entropy weight of advanced AHP
CN105956789A (en) Quantitative risk evaluation method for power equipment based on state evaluation
CN104657822A (en) Power system disaster warning grading method and system based on risk evaluation result
CN107742040A (en) A kind of power transmission line comprehensive methods of risk assessment based on TOPSIS and optimum combination weight
CN103235991A (en) Condition evaluation method of distribution network transformer based on fuzzy theory
CN103675525A (en) DC-DC converter health monitoring and fault prediction method based on multiple SVDD models
CN103150635B (en) Power equipment O&M method
CN106251045A (en) Distribution network reliability appraisal procedure based on multiple leading factor
CN104598734A (en) Life prediction model of rolling bearing integrated expectation maximization and particle filter
CN104268381A (en) Satellite fault diagnosing method based on AdaBoost algorithm
CN105279612A (en) Poisson distribution-based power transmission line tripping risk assessment method
CN105760979A (en) Power system transient risk evaluation method taking natural disasters into consideration
CN108681800A (en) A kind of fortune inspection methods of risk assessment of distributed new access power distribution network
CN105912857A (en) Selection and configuration method of distribution equipment state monitoring sensors
CN104574211B (en) Forming Electrical Dispatching Command Tickets method for prewarning risk and system based on risk source
CN103164619B (en) Grounding net of transformer substation corrosion rate pattern recognition method based on best discriminant technique criterion
CN105741184A (en) Transformer state evaluation method and apparatus
CN104143158A (en) Method for monitoring reliability of power system element under condition of multiple meteorological factors
CN103268391A (en) Naive-Bayes-based adaptive lightning disaster risk estimation method
CN107886220A (en) A kind of distribution line risk probability appraisal procedure based on historical factor analysis
CN105488308A (en) Multi-scale comprehensive analysis method for influence of disasters on electrical grid
CN105678460B (en) The correlation analysis method of Lightning Disaster and apparatus overload and cross section limit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Huang Yong

Inventor after: Zhao Jie

Inventor after: Liu Dichen

Inventor after: Zhao Hongsheng

Inventor after: Zhou Yutian

Inventor after: Wang Jun

Inventor after: Tang Fei

Inventor after: Yang Nan

Inventor before: Zhao Jie

Inventor before: Huang Yong

Inventor before: Liu Dichen

Inventor before: Zhao Hongsheng

Inventor before: Zhou Yutian

Inventor before: Tang Fei

Inventor before: Wang Jun

Inventor before: Yang Nan

COR Change of bibliographic data
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20140326