CN103424318B - A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve - Google Patents
A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103424318B CN103424318B CN201210164718.5A CN201210164718A CN103424318B CN 103424318 B CN103424318 B CN 103424318B CN 201210164718 A CN201210164718 A CN 201210164718A CN 103424318 B CN103424318 B CN 103424318B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fld0
- dynaform
- softwares
- sheet metal
- limit curve
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Abstract
The present invention relates to a kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve, stamping simulation is carried out to being tested sheet metal by Stamping CAE simulation-analysis software DYNAFORM softwares, so that it is determined that the FLD0 values in forming limit diagram, by Keeler formula, the shaping limit curve of tested sheet metal is calculated and obtained.Compared with the conventional method, the determination method more simple possible of metal sheet forming limit curve of the present invention, and cost is relatively low, error is smaller.
Description
Technical field
Sheet metal Plastic Forming performance index --- the determination method of shaping limit curve is characterized the present invention relates to one kind.
Background technology
The basic mechanical performance index of sheet metal can only make qualitative, comprehensive half to sheet material forming performance and comment
Valency.For the shaping of complicated shape part, each local reality of blank can not be described and weigh comprehensively with basic mechanical performance index
Border deformation.Shaping limit curve (Forming Limit Curves-- are abbreviated as FLC) is be conceived to complex parts every
One deformation is local, and it is local buckling limiting strain principal strain ε of the plate under differently strained path1With secondary strain stress2Constitute
Strip-form curve.FLD (Forming Limit Diagram- are abbreviated as FLD, identical with FLC physical meaning) is comprehensively, intuitively
The forming property for reflecting plate under strain conditions, be a kind of quantitative description to sheet metal formability, it is qualitative
With the effective means of quantitative study plate partial plastic forming performance.
The test method for obtaining metal sheet forming curve (FLC) now is according to national standard:GB/T 15825.8-
1995《Sheet metal formability is tested with test method-forming limit diagram (FLD)》To be tested.Its method substantially step
For:
1st, grid is printed on sheet metal using electrochemical process, and cuts various sizes of sheet coupon and accordingly tested
Carried out in equipment stamping;
2nd, warp mesh circle is measured in the critical grid garden near stamping rear selection necking down area on tool microscope
Major axis and minor axis dimension, so as to obtain principal strain ε1, secondary strain stress2Value, then by (ε1, ε2) coordinate points are plotted to ε1For horizontal stroke
Coordinate, ε2For in the coordinate system of ordinate, you can obtain the forming limit diagram of sheet metal.
The difficulty that this method test FLD faces often mainly has:
1st, because the grid being printed on sheet metal can not produce prestrain, it is necessary to by electrochemical corrosion in metallic plate
Grid is printed on material, and corresponding grid printed apparatus price is relatively expensive;
2nd, the dimensions of metal blank sample needed for during test obtains FLC is up to nine kinds, every kind of at least to prepare
3-5 pieces, material requested is more (3-5 groups);
3rd, after metallic plate punching deformation, because sheet metal comes in contact with punch-die, extruded in forming process, change
The electrochemical corrosion grid at the larger position of shape amount is usually worn, and causes the grid after abrasion to be difficult to it is clear that measuring, calculating ε1、ε2
Produce certain difficulty, relative increase draws the error and difficulty of FLC curves.
The content of the invention
A kind of metal sheet forming limit curve is provided it is an object of the invention to overcome the defect of prior art really
Determine method, this method more simple possible.
The object of the present invention is achieved like this:
A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve of the present invention, comprises the following steps:
S1:The experiment of different drawing heights is carried out to the slab for being tested sheet metal on forcing press, slab drawing is measured
Just there is the rupture drawing height h2 ruptured in limit drawing modulus h1 and drawing during success;
S2:The stress-strain diagram of tested sheet metal is obtained by tension test;
S3:The newly-built tested sheet metal in the material depot of Stamping CAE simulation-analysis software DYNAFORM softwares
Material depot, imports the material database, first in DYNAFORM by the stress-strain diagram of the obtained tested sheet metals of step S2
An initial FLD0 value is set in the newly-built material depot of software, actual forcing press punching press is simulated for DYNAFORM softwares
Shaping;
S4:Forcing press punch test convex mould, cavity plate, slab, blank holder mathematical model are imported in DYNAFORM softwares,
Related process parameters in forcing press punch test set the corresponding process parameters in DYNAFORM simulation softwards, set pole
Drawing height h1 and rupture drawing height h2 are limited, stamping simulation is carried out respectively;
S5:If analog result is consistent with actual punching press situation, the initial FLD0 values set in step S3 are defined as
FLD0 values in forming limit diagram, by Keeler formula, calculate and obtain the shaping limit curve of tested sheet metal;
If analog result is not met with actual punching press situation, comparative simulation result and actual punching press result are corresponding to increase
Big or reduction FLD0 values, are combined into until the FLD0 values set in DYNAFORM softwares make analog result be consistent with actual punching press result
Only, so far FLD0 is determined, then by Keeler formula, calculates and obtain the shaping limit curve of tested sheet metal.
Compared with the conventional method, the determination method more simple possible of metal sheet forming limit curve of the present invention, and
Cost is relatively low, and error is smaller.
Brief description of the drawings
The cylindrical element of forcing press punching press drawing when Fig. 1 is slab diameter 87mm stretching height 21mm (drawing does not rupture);
(drawing produces broken the cylindrical element of forcing press punching press drawing when Fig. 2 is slab diameter 88mm, stretching height 20mm
Split);
Fig. 3 is introduced into the stress-strain diagram of experiment dual phase steel in DYNAFORM softwares;
Fig. 4 is the shaping limit curve that experiment dual phase steel uses initial FLD0 values;
Fig. 5 is the forming process simulation image that FLD0 is 0.24;
Fig. 6 is the forming process simulation image that FLD0 is 0.25;
Fig. 7 is the shaping limit curve of experiment dual phase steel.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with embodiment and accompanying drawing, the invention will be further described.
Embodiment
The present embodiment a kind of high intensity experiment is formed with dual phase steel the determination of limit curve, comprises the following steps:
S1:Carry out the experiment of different drawing heights with the slab of dual phase steel to experiment on forcing press, measure slab drawing
The rupture drawing height h2 that rupturing just occur in limit drawing modulus h1 (actually measured h1 is 87mm) and drawing during success is (actual
H1 is measured for 88mm), table 1 below is the actual drawing situation of the experiment dual phase steel:
Referring to Fig. 1, the cylinder of forcing press punching press drawing when slab diameter 87mm stretching height 21mm are shown in figure
Part, drawing does not rupture;
Referring to Fig. 2, the cylinder of forcing press punching press drawing when slab diameter 88mm, stretching height 20mm are shown in figure
Part, drawing produces rupture.
S2:The stress-strain diagram of tested sheet metal is obtained by tension test;
S3:The newly-built tested sheet metal in the material depot of Stamping CAE simulation-analysis software DYNAFORM softwares
Material depot, the experiment that step S2 is obtained imports the material database with the stress-strain diagram of dual phase steel (as shown in figure 3, figure
Middle abscissa is strain stress (%), and ordinate is stress σ (MPa)), due to the FLC curve shapes substantially one of similar metal sheet material
Sample, simply FLD 0 be worth difference, can first in the newly-built material depot of DYNAFORM softwares set an initial FLD0 value, with
It is stamping that actual forcing press is simulated in DYNAFORM softwares;
Fig. 4 uses the right in the shaping limit curve of initial FLD0 values, figure to be DYNAFORM softwares for experiment dual phase steel
The forming limit curve of the middle dual phase steel determined according to FLC_Keeler formula, the left side sets FLD0, right according to FLD0 difference
The forming curve on side is vertically moved along above and below Y-axis.
S4:Forcing press punch test convex mould, cavity plate, slab, blank holder mathematical model are imported in DYNAFORM softwares,
Related process parameters in forcing press punch test set the corresponding process parameters in DYNAFORM simulation softwards, set pole
Drawing height h1 and rupture drawing height h2 are limited, stamping simulation is carried out respectively;
The punching press situation of cylindrical element is striking out when the different FLD0 values of setting are to slab diameter 88mm, stretching height 20mm
Simulated in type simulation softward DYANFORM, physical simulation result see the table below 2:
FLD0 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
Analog result | Rupture | Rupture | Rupture | Rupture | Rupture | Do not break |
Fig. 5 is that the point position in the forming process simulation image that FLD0 is 0.24, circle is generation rent;
Fig. 6 is the forming process simulation image that FLD0 is 0.25, and bottom roundings represent that being in hazardous area does not break still
Split place.
S5:If analog result is consistent with actual punching press situation, the initial FLD0 values set in step S3 are determined
For the FLD0 values in forming limit diagram, experiment is also accordingly determined with the shaping limit curve of dual phase steel.
If analog result is not met with actual punching press situation, comparative simulation result and actual punching press result, accordingly
Increase reduces FLD0 values, until the FLD0 values set in DYNAFORM softwares make analog result be consistent with actual punching press result
Untill, so far FLD0 is determined, experiment also mutually should determine that with the shaping limit curve of dual phase steel.
Shaping limit curve can be gone to calculate according to Keeler formula, therefore the FLD curve shapes of a class steel will be protected
As holding, differ only in FLD0 difference so that the FLD curves in figure are influenceed by FLD0 numerical value, are moved up and down.Therefore
FLD0 position can be substantially determined by actual punching press, is then clicked on " export " in Fig. 4, it is each on export FLC curves
Point coordinates, the curve can be drawn out by these coordinate points in excel softwares.
As can be seen that when FLD0 points are 0.24, experiment dual phase steel just ruptures from table 2, Fig. 5-6;Work as FLD0
When point is 0.25, sample does not just rupture.Hence, it can be determined that the FLD0=0.24 of experiment dual phase steel, then DYNAFORM
The shaping limit curve of experiment dual phase steel is as shown in Figure 7 in material depot.
Above example is used for illustrative purposes only, rather than limitation of the present invention, about the technology people of technical field
Member, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, can also make various conversion or modification, therefore all equivalent
Technical scheme should also belong to scope of the invention, should be limited by each claim.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
S1:The experiment of different drawing heights is carried out to the slab for being tested sheet metal on forcing press, the success of slab drawing is measured
When limit drawing modulus h1 and drawing just there is the rupture drawing height h2 ruptured;
S2:The stress-strain diagram of tested sheet metal is obtained by tension test;
S3:The material of newly-built tested sheet metal in the material depot of Stamping CAE simulation-analysis software DYNAFORM softwares
Storehouse, imports material database, first in DYNAFORM softwares by the stress-strain diagram of the obtained tested sheet metals of step S2
An initial FLD0 value is set in newly-built material depot, it is stamping to simulate actual forcing press for DYNAFORM softwares;
S4:Forcing press punch test convex mould, cavity plate, slab, blank holder mathematical model are imported in DYNAFORM softwares, according to
Related process parameters in forcing press punch test set the corresponding process parameters in DYNAFORM simulation softwards, and setting limit is drawn
Deep height h1 and rupture drawing height h2, carries out stamping simulation respectively;
S5:If analog result is consistent with actual punching press situation, the initial FLD0 values set in step S3 are defined as shaping
FLD0 values in limiting figure, by Keeler formula, calculate and obtain the shaping limit curve of tested sheet metal;
If analog result is not met with actual punching press situation, comparative simulation result and actual punching press result, increase accordingly or
Reduce FLD0 values, untill the FLD0 values set in DYNAFORM softwares make analog result be consistent with actual punching press result,
So far FLD0 is determined, then by Keeler formula, calculates and obtain the shaping limit curve of tested sheet metal.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210164718.5A CN103424318B (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2012-05-23 | A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210164718.5A CN103424318B (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2012-05-23 | A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103424318A CN103424318A (en) | 2013-12-04 |
CN103424318B true CN103424318B (en) | 2017-10-10 |
Family
ID=49649394
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210164718.5A Expired - Fee Related CN103424318B (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2012-05-23 | A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103424318B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103852382B (en) * | 2014-03-04 | 2016-02-10 | 湖南大学 | A kind of method for building up of high strength steel plate thermoforming limiting figure |
CN106457336B (en) * | 2014-06-11 | 2018-10-12 | 麦格纳国际公司 | Change shaping limit curve based on zero friction analysis |
CN104155194B (en) * | 2014-07-22 | 2016-05-18 | 武汉钢铁(集团)公司 | The FLC method of testing changing based on strain rate |
CN106442128B (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2019-03-29 | 山西太钢不锈钢股份有限公司 | A kind of stainless steel limited drawing ratio test method |
CN108801801B (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2019-10-08 | 燕山大学 | A kind of measuring method of sheet alloy hot forming limit curve |
CN111496121A (en) * | 2020-03-19 | 2020-08-07 | 上海理工大学 | Method for selecting seal head material for deep drawing forming of simple pressure container and seal head forming process |
CN112257302B (en) * | 2020-09-11 | 2023-04-18 | 唐山钢铁集团有限责任公司 | Method for constructing plate forming limit curve by adopting limit thickness |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007285832A (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2007-11-01 | Nippon Steel Corp | System and method for acquiring breaking point, system and method for estimating break, programs and recording media of these method |
CN101354731A (en) * | 2008-02-19 | 2009-01-28 | 江苏大学 | Method for establishing and using difference thick laser assembly solder plate forming limit picture |
CN101738370A (en) * | 2008-11-11 | 2010-06-16 | 首钢总公司 | Experiment method for judging sheet metal forming limit point |
-
2012
- 2012-05-23 CN CN201210164718.5A patent/CN103424318B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007285832A (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2007-11-01 | Nippon Steel Corp | System and method for acquiring breaking point, system and method for estimating break, programs and recording media of these method |
CN101354731A (en) * | 2008-02-19 | 2009-01-28 | 江苏大学 | Method for establishing and using difference thick laser assembly solder plate forming limit picture |
CN101738370A (en) * | 2008-11-11 | 2010-06-16 | 首钢总公司 | Experiment method for judging sheet metal forming limit point |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
基于有限元方针的左半边成形极限图建立方法;王东 等;《机械制造与自动化》;20050531(第3期);74-76 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103424318A (en) | 2013-12-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103424318B (en) | A kind of determination method of metal sheet forming limit curve | |
CN104220185B (en) | The manufacture method of the method for making of stamping forming limit line chart, fracturing shape method and punching parts | |
Lei et al. | Finite element analysis and design in stainless steel sheet forming and its experimental comparison | |
LANG et al. | Pre-bulging effect during sheet hydroforming process of aluminum alloy box with unequal height and flat bottom | |
CN104307939A (en) | Springback compensation method of thin-wall stamped part with large relative bending radius | |
Jiao-Jiao et al. | A novel approach to springback control of high-strength steel in cold roll forming | |
CN104755187B (en) | Springback capacity evaluation methodology | |
Demirci et al. | The theoretical and experimental investigation of blank holder forces plate effect in deep drawing process of AL 1050 material | |
Slota et al. | Springback prediction in sheet metal forming processes | |
CN112257302B (en) | Method for constructing plate forming limit curve by adopting limit thickness | |
CN103934313A (en) | Grid strain analysis method for thin plate forming and application of method | |
CN101976291B (en) | Manufacturing method of heat exchanger plate | |
CN102759505A (en) | Auxiliary device for medium plate material compression test and measuring method for flowing stress curve | |
Zheng et al. | Investigation on the plastic deformation during the stamping of ellipsoidal heads for pressure vessels | |
Namoco Jr et al. | Experimental and numerical investigation of restoration behavior of sheet metals subjected to bulging deformation | |
EP3747566A1 (en) | Press molding method, rigidity-improved-position specifying method, press-molding system, and press-molded product | |
JP5900751B2 (en) | Evaluation method and prediction method of bending inner crack | |
Vedpathak et al. | Evaluation of deep drawing force in sheet metal forming | |
Berezin et al. | Finite-element simulation of the cold stamping process of spherical vessels | |
Jawad et al. | Studying the effect of punch nose radius on deep drawing operation | |
Chen et al. | Experimental and Simulation Analysis of Effect of Fillet Radius of Micro Square Hole on Copper Sheets in Deep Drawing of Sheets | |
WO2023037689A1 (en) | Press forming crack determination method, press forming crack determination apparatus, and press forming crack determination program, and press forming crack suppressing method | |
Huang | An analysis of the elliptical cup hydraulic drawing process | |
JP2024031803A (en) | Press forming analysis method, press forming crack determination method for press formed products, press forming product manufacturing method, press forming analysis device, press forming analysis program | |
Aljabiri | Finite element analysis of blank design optimal to produce a triangle cup by deep drawing process |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20171010 Termination date: 20180523 |