CN103413207A - Scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method - Google Patents
Scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103413207A CN103413207A CN2013103874830A CN201310387483A CN103413207A CN 103413207 A CN103413207 A CN 103413207A CN 2013103874830 A CN2013103874830 A CN 2013103874830A CN 201310387483 A CN201310387483 A CN 201310387483A CN 103413207 A CN103413207 A CN 103413207A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- scientific
- index
- technological
- qualitative
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on a qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method. The scientific and technological talent evaluation method comprises the step of standardizing qualitative indexes, wherein a fuzzy membership assignment method is adopted, the qualitative indexes are divided into one to four grades and correspond to certain scores respectively, then the corresponding relation between the grades and the degree of membership is set up, the determination of the scores of the qualitative indexes can be provided by expert review, and each index evaluation value is an average value; the step of studying and setting a scientific and technological talent evaluation index system weight set; the step of evaluating the evaluation of index impact factors, wherein quantitative analysis is carried out on the qualitative indexes in a scientific and technological evaluation index system, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, classification sorting and other methods are introduced, and a scientific and technological talent impact factor evaluation method is set. According to the scientific and technological talent evaluation method, a pointed talent introduction, evaluation, excitation and selection working mechanism is built, the innovation potential and the energy of industrial scientific and technological talents are aroused, and the scientific and technological talent evaluation method is of great significance in comprehensively improving scientific and technological innovation capacity and service capability.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the technical information appraisal procedure, be specifically related to a kind of sci-tech talents evaluation methods based on qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment.
Technical field
The research of therefrom outer study of human ability circle, to skilled personnel's discussion with define and all there is no unified definition always, do not have clear and definite border yet.Skilled personnel's type is a lot, can distinguish by diverse ways and angle.Angle research from narrow sense, skilled personnel refer to through institution of higher learning and cultivate, have the suitable capacity of scientific research, have certain professional knowledge and talent and learning, have the people that scientific payoffs certain ability and speciality, that can take oneself contributes as social economy and development.Therefore, said skilled personnel, distinguish according to its post characteristics and job characteristics, and type comprises: the Research team formed in the research-based skilled personnel of institution of higher learning, scientific research institutions, enterprises and institutions, application skilled personnel and work.
Specifically for during " 12 ", analyze its technical skills characteristics, working experience, with and to the demand of career development platform and innovation environment, shoot the arrow at the target.By assessment indicator system and the factor of influence evaluation method of research for skilled personnel, build talent introduction targetedly, test and appraisal, excitation, choice working mechanism, excite the industry science and technology talent's potential of innovation and vigor, General Promotion sci-tech innovation ability and service ability have great importance.
Summary of the invention
The problems referred to above for prior art exists, the purpose of this invention is to provide a kind of sci-tech talents evaluation methods based on qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment.
Realize above-mentioned purpose, the technical solution used in the present invention is as follows: a kind of sci-tech talents evaluation methods based on qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment comprises the steps:
(1) standardization of qualitative index: adopt fuzzy membership assignment method, qualitative index is divided into to 1-4 class, and score value corresponding to difference, then set up the corresponding relation between each class and degree of membership; The experts' evaluation meeting that defines of qualitative index score value provides, and each index evaluation of estimate is got average, and computing formula is:
In formula: n is expert judging panel number, and 5-10 people is advisable; B is that index is estimated score value; W is every expert judging panel's weighted value;
(2) research of skilled personnel's assessment indicator system weight sets and setting: adopt the instruments such as Delphi method, comprehensive evaluation, analytical hierarchy process or Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment to determine the weight of skilled personnel's evaluation index;
(3) evaluation of evaluation index factor of influence: by the qualitative index quantitative analysis in skilled personnel's assessment indicator system, introduce the methods such as fuzzy overall evaluation and classification and ordination, build skilled personnel's factor of influence evaluation method.
Compared to existing technology, the present invention has following beneficial effect:
1, the present invention is directed to the actual demand to the talent of " 12 " scientific and technical development program, key enterprise, based on skilled personnel's classification, regional skilled personnel's present situation investigated, find out existence problem, generation reason and corresponding countermeasure is proposed.Study and arrange skilled personnel and estimate flow process, mainly study skilled personnel and estimate the content of links and science, rationality and the operability of flow setting.
2, according to skilled personnel's situation, the present invention is divided into professional and compound two large classes by skilled personnel, utilize the scientific and technological classification of qualified personnel assessment indicator system of responsibility function analysis method design, and according to the identification of skilled personnel's classification indicators significance level, index is screened to merging, set up skilled personnel's Classified Index System.
3, by the qualitative index quantitative analysis in skilled personnel's assessment indicator system, introduce the methods such as fuzzy overall evaluation and classification and ordination, build skilled personnel's factor of influence evaluation method.Build talent introduction targetedly, test and appraisal, excitation, choice working mechanism, excite the industry science and technology talent's potential of innovation and vigor, General Promotion sci-tech innovation ability and service ability have great importance.
The accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the particular flow sheet that the present invention is based on the sci-tech talents evaluation methods of qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment.
Fig. 2 is the skilled personnel's assessment indicator system block diagram the present invention relates to.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with specific embodiment, the present invention is described in further detail.
A kind of sci-tech talents evaluation methods based on qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment, comprise the steps:
(1) standardization of qualitative index: adopt fuzzy membership assignment method, qualitative index is divided into to 1-4 class, and score value corresponding to difference, then set up the corresponding relation between each class and degree of membership; The experts' evaluation meeting that defines of qualitative index score value provides, and each index evaluation of estimate is got average, and computing formula is:
In formula: n is expert judging panel number, and 5-10 people is advisable; B is that index is estimated score value; W is every expert judging panel's weighted value.
(2) research of skilled personnel's assessment indicator system weight sets and setting: adopt the instruments such as Delphi method, comprehensive evaluation, analytical hierarchy process or Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment to determine the weight of skilled personnel's evaluation index;
(3) evaluation method of evaluation index factor of influence: by the qualitative index quantitative analysis in skilled personnel's assessment indicator system, introduce the methods such as fuzzy overall evaluation and classification and ordination, build skilled personnel's factor of influence evaluation method.
The sci-tech talents evaluation methods the present invention relates to wherein, skilled personnel estimate comprise establishment assessment indicator system and evaluation plan, the data of collecting the talent to be evaluated, data verification, analysis, dispensing expert, can the net unification expert opinion, mark/suggestion Macro or mass analysis, write evaluation opinion, audit evaluation opinion, skilled personnel's evaluation opinion and gather.
Referring to Fig. 1, the idiographic flow that the present invention is based on the sci-tech talents evaluation methods of qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment is: at first, set up skilled personnel's Classified Index System: based on the assurance to strategic new industry skilled personnel's demand intension, following purpose, definition, on the basis of the principle of design such as operability and science, in conjunction with scientific and technological Current Situation of Talents investigation report, research skilled personnel assessment indicator system foundation and method to set up be set, set up on this basis a set of assessment models of estimating for skilled personnel, this model is around know-how, the intelligence pattern, basic quality, 5 dimensions such as professional ability and achievement achievement design and set up skilled personnel's assessment indicator system, and to qualitative description quantification wherein, this has solved know-how when skilled personnel estimated in the past to a certain extent, ideological quality, the too many problem of subjective assessment on the dimensions such as basic quality.Then, assessment models having been carried out to fairness, operability etc. analyzes.Finally, assessment indicator system is decomposed and refinement for research-based skilled personnel, three evaluation objects of application skilled personnel and scientific and technical research team, form the skilled personnel's assessment indicator system finally needed.
Referring to Fig. 2, skilled personnel's assessment indicator system comprises:
(1) skilled personnel's assessment indicator system will be divided into 2 levels and the description of index implication, and 2 evaluation index levels are respectively: first class index layer (know-how, intelligence pattern, basic quality, professional ability and achievement achievement), two-level index layer (5 first class index are carried out to refinement).
(2) research of skilled personnel's assessment indicator system and design (the research-based skilled personnel assessment indicator system of take is example), carried out know-how class index Design (A1), intelligence Pattern Class index Design (A2), basic quality class index Design (A3), professional ability class index Design (A4) and with achievement, become fruit index Design (A5).
Finally explanation is, above-described embodiment is only unrestricted in order to technical scheme of the present invention to be described, although with reference to preferred embodiment, the present invention is had been described in detail, those of ordinary skill in the art is to be understood that, can modify or be equal to replacement technical scheme of the present invention, and not breaking away from aim and the scope of technical solution of the present invention, it all should be encompassed in the middle of claim scope of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. based on the sci-tech talents evaluation methods of qualitative standardization and factor of influence evaluation assessment, comprise the steps:
(1) standardization of qualitative index: adopt fuzzy membership assignment method, qualitative index is divided into to 1-4 class, and score value corresponding to difference, then set up the corresponding relation between each class and degree of membership; The experts' evaluation meeting that defines of qualitative index score value provides, and each index evaluation of estimate is got average, and computing formula is:
In formula: n is expert judging panel number, and 5-10 people is advisable;
B is that index is estimated score value;
W is every expert judging panel's weighted value;
(2) research of skilled personnel's assessment indicator system weight sets and setting: adopt the instruments such as Delphi method, comprehensive evaluation, analytical hierarchy process or Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment to determine the weight of skilled personnel's evaluation index;
(3) evaluation of evaluation index factor of influence: by the qualitative index quantitative analysis in skilled personnel's assessment indicator system, introduce the methods such as fuzzy overall evaluation and classification and ordination, build skilled personnel's factor of influence evaluation method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2013103874830A CN103413207A (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2013-08-30 | Scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2013103874830A CN103413207A (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2013-08-30 | Scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN103413207A true CN103413207A (en) | 2013-11-27 |
Family
ID=49606213
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2013103874830A Withdrawn CN103413207A (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2013-08-30 | Scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN103413207A (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104599062A (en) * | 2015-01-13 | 2015-05-06 | 中国农业大学 | Classification based value evaluation method and system for agricultural scientific and technological achievements |
| CN107644301A (en) * | 2017-10-13 | 2018-01-30 | 温志强 | Computer based talent assessment method and system |
| CN109102142A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2018-12-28 | 山东鲁能软件技术有限公司 | A kind of personnel evaluation methods and system based on evaluation criterion tree |
| CN113455394A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-10-01 | 中国热带农业科学院橡胶研究所 | Standardized production method for large-scale breeding of rubber tree somatic embryo seedlings |
| CN114140036A (en) * | 2022-02-08 | 2022-03-04 | 北京融信数联科技有限公司 | Enterprise portrait method, system and readable storage medium based on data analysis |
| CN114862211A (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2022-08-05 | 山西鑫鼎宸科技股份有限公司 | Staff daily performance evaluation model based on data quantitative analysis |
| CN116307921A (en) * | 2023-03-30 | 2023-06-23 | 国网甘肃省电力公司信息通信公司 | Method and system for evaluating talent growth |
-
2013
- 2013-08-30 CN CN2013103874830A patent/CN103413207A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104599062A (en) * | 2015-01-13 | 2015-05-06 | 中国农业大学 | Classification based value evaluation method and system for agricultural scientific and technological achievements |
| CN107644301A (en) * | 2017-10-13 | 2018-01-30 | 温志强 | Computer based talent assessment method and system |
| CN109102142A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2018-12-28 | 山东鲁能软件技术有限公司 | A kind of personnel evaluation methods and system based on evaluation criterion tree |
| CN113455394A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-10-01 | 中国热带农业科学院橡胶研究所 | Standardized production method for large-scale breeding of rubber tree somatic embryo seedlings |
| CN114140036A (en) * | 2022-02-08 | 2022-03-04 | 北京融信数联科技有限公司 | Enterprise portrait method, system and readable storage medium based on data analysis |
| CN114862211A (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2022-08-05 | 山西鑫鼎宸科技股份有限公司 | Staff daily performance evaluation model based on data quantitative analysis |
| CN116307921A (en) * | 2023-03-30 | 2023-06-23 | 国网甘肃省电力公司信息通信公司 | Method and system for evaluating talent growth |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103413207A (en) | Scientific and technological talent evaluation method based on qualitative standardization and impact factor evaluation method | |
| Angilella et al. | The financing of innovative SMEs: A multicriteria credit rating model | |
| Song et al. | Measuring and modeling labor productivity using historical data | |
| Vujanović et al. | Evaluation of vehicle fleet maintenance management indicators by application of DEMATEL and ANP | |
| Uzkurt et al. | The impact of environmental uncertainty dimensions on organisational innovativeness: An empirical study on SMEs | |
| Bernal et al. | Financial market time series prediction with recurrent neural networks | |
| Jana et al. | A granular deep learning approach for predicting energy consumption | |
| Li et al. | Performance evaluation of economic relocation effect for environmental non-governmental organizations: Evidence from China | |
| Chang et al. | A quantitative method to analyze the quality of EIA information in wind energy development and avian/bat assessments | |
| Chen et al. | Vulnerability modeling, assessment, and improvement in urban metro systems: A probabilistic system dynamics approach | |
| Gilyazutdinova et al. | Technique of the analysis and assessment of innovative industrial risks at different stages of innovative activity | |
| Li et al. | Impact of pollution-related punitive measures on the adoption of cleaner production technology: Simulation based on an evolutionary game model | |
| CN103700029A (en) | Establishing method for post-evaluation index system for power grid construction project | |
| Ponikarova et al. | Management model of sustainable development of petrochemical industry enterprises | |
| Jawad et al. | Hierarchical structuring of organizational performance using interpretive structural modeling | |
| Kyzym et al. | Simulating Development of Science in a Country with the Use of the Cognitive Approach | |
| CN112488530B (en) | Intelligent level monitoring method, system, equipment and medium for refining enterprises | |
| Li et al. | P2P default risk prediction based on XGBoost, SVM and RF fusion model | |
| Hahanov et al. | CyUni service—Smart cyber university | |
| Sun et al. | An evaluation model for the teaching reform of the physical education industry | |
| Gül et al. | An Approach to Determining the Evaluation Criteria of Cultural Heritage Sites in Terms of Heritage Values | |
| Li et al. | [Retracted] Analysis of Risk Assessment of Overseas Infrastructure Projects Integrating BP‐ANN Algorithm | |
| Heckman | Does management matter? Testing models of government performance | |
| Handriana et al. | Analysis Audit Information Technology: Green Technology, Smart System And Innovation Behavior Working For Improving Business Services University In Indonesia (Case Study: UIN Surabaya and UIN Malang) | |
| Sun et al. | Environmental regulation, sentiment, and eco-innovation: evidence from China |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20131127 |
|
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |