CN103412104A - Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water - Google Patents

Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN103412104A
CN103412104A CN2013103138201A CN201310313820A CN103412104A CN 103412104 A CN103412104 A CN 103412104A CN 2013103138201 A CN2013103138201 A CN 2013103138201A CN 201310313820 A CN201310313820 A CN 201310313820A CN 103412104 A CN103412104 A CN 103412104A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
centerdot
groundwater
evaluation
value
vulnerability
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN2013103138201A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN103412104B (en
Inventor
王东
吴舜泽
吴悦颖
刘伟江
丁贞玉
文一
朱岗辉
井柳新
孙宏亮
张涛
郜志云
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CHINESE ACADEMY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Original Assignee
CHINESE ACADEMY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CHINESE ACADEMY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING filed Critical CHINESE ACADEMY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Priority to CN201310313820.1A priority Critical patent/CN103412104B/en
Publication of CN103412104A publication Critical patent/CN103412104A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN103412104B publication Critical patent/CN103412104B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water, and belongs to the field of environmental science and environmental risk. The method is capable of solving a problem that existing evaluation methods of frangibility of underground water are not suitable for the conditions of our country. A technical scheme of the invention comprises following steps: underground water type, frangibility evaluation indexes and parameters are obtained by hole drilling, empirical values or field pumping tests; a weight matrix is built based on the frangibility evaluation indexes, and objective weighted value of each frangibility evaluation index in the weight matrix is obtained respectively; independent evaluation result of each frangibility evaluation index in the weight matrix is obtain respectively; and an underground water frangibility evaluation map is obtained according to the objective weighted values and the independent evaluation results. The method can be used in underground water frangibility evaluation system.

Description

A kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method
Technical field
The present invention relates to environmental science and environmental risk field, relate in particular to a kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method.
Background technology
Groundwater resource are the grand strategy resources that support the sustainable development of socio-economy.Along with the Chinese society expanding economy, groundwater environment pressure increases gradually.But, groundwater management basis, the whole nation is quite weak, the basic environment situation is unclear, statutory standard construction hysteresis, supervisory system are left to be desired, and to China's socio-economic development, answer the water safety guarantee to constitute a serious threat, becomes the restraining factors of China's economy, society and harmonious development.
Carry out the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation and be the most important basic measures of effectively protecting groundwater environment and carrying out the groundwater contamination prevention and control, its evaluation result chooses for the Groundwater seedbed and division of protection zones, groundwater contamination prevention and control scheme, the policy making of Land in Regional Land exploitation, municipal refuse are stacked Site Selection, the Ground water Quality Survey screen cloth is established all has important directive significance.
Yet, due to the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation that the overlapped index method based on DRASTIC model or European model carries out, all be based on European Characteristics of Karst and set up, be not suitable for China.
Summary of the invention
Embodiments of the invention provide a kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method, can be applicable to China's underground water.
For achieving the above object, embodiments of the invention adopt following technical scheme:
A kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method comprises: obtain groundwater type, Evaluation of vulnerability index and parameter according to boring, empirical value or field bailing test; According to described Evaluation of vulnerability setup measures weight matrix, and obtain respectively the target weight value of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in described weight matrix; Obtain respectively the independent assessment result of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in described weight matrix; According to described target weight value and described independent assessment result, obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map.
The Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, can be according to groundwater type, Evaluation of vulnerability index, determine target weight value and independent assessment result, thereby can obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map according to target weight value and independent assessment result, realize the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation.This technical scheme has solved the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation of carrying out due to the overlapped index method based on DRASTIC model or European model in the prior art, all is based on European Characteristics of Karst and sets up, and is not suitable for the problem of China.
The accompanying drawing explanation
In order to be illustrated more clearly in the embodiment of the present invention or technical scheme of the prior art, below will the accompanying drawing of required use in embodiment or description of the Prior Art be briefly described, apparently, accompanying drawing in the following describes is only some embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skills, under the prerequisite of not paying creative work, can also obtain according to these accompanying drawings other accompanying drawing.
The process flow diagram of the Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that Fig. 1 provides for the embodiment of the present invention one;
Fig. 2 obtains the process flow diagram of independent assessment result in Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method shown in Figure 1;
Fig. 3 obtains the process flow diagram of Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map in Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method shown in Figure 1;
The process flow diagram of the Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that Fig. 4 provides for the embodiment of the present invention two.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is clearly and completely described, obviously, described embodiment is only the present invention's part embodiment, rather than whole embodiment.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skills obtain under the prerequisite of not making creative work every other embodiment, belong to the scope of protection of the invention.
For solving the evaluation of prior art Groundwater Vulnerability, be not suitable for the problem of China, the invention provides a kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method.
Embodiment mono-:
As shown in Figure 1, the Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that the embodiment of the present invention provides comprises:
Step 101, obtain groundwater type, Evaluation of vulnerability index and parameter according to boring, empirical value or field bailing test.
In the present embodiment, groundwater type in step 101 can comprise: hole diving, hole piestic water or karst water; The Evaluation of vulnerability index can comprise: essential fragility index and/or special fragility index; Wherein, essential fragility index comprises: one or more in soil media, groundwater level depth, clean increment, aeration zone viscous soil horizon thickness, infiltration coefficient, water-bearing zone thickness and terrain slope; Special fragility index comprises: one or more in pollutant Transport And Transformation rule, drainage density, land use pattern and mining of groundwater degree.
Wherein, can obtain soil media, aeration zone viscous soil horizon thickness, water-bearing zone thickness etc. by bore mode; Can obtain infiltration coefficient etc. by empirical value or field bailing test, this is no longer going to repeat them.
Step 102, according to described Evaluation of vulnerability setup measures weight matrix, and obtain respectively the target weight value of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in weight matrix.
In the present embodiment, the process of obtaining respectively the target weight value of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in weight matrix by step 102 can comprise: the matrix value that obtains weight matrix; According to matrix value, obtain corresponding weighted value; Weighted value is verified, be verified result; The result shows when checking is not passed through, and again obtains the matrix value of weight matrix, is verified until the result shows; The result shows while being verified, the weighted value be verified is made as to the target weight value.
Wherein, the matrix-valued process of obtaining weight matrix can comprise: the Evaluation of vulnerability index in weight matrix is compared in twos, obtain comparative result; According to comparative result, determine the matrix value of weight matrix.With bij, mean the importance of bi to bj, according to psychologist's result of study, the limit of the qualitative distinctive information grade of people is 7 ± 2.Therefore adopt 1～9 ratio scaling law as shown in table 1.Judgement Matrix has following character: bij > 0; Bij=1/bji; During i=j, bij=1.
Table 1 is passed judgment on rule
Figure BDA00003557987100031
Can calculate eigenvalue of maximum characteristic of correspondence vector by judgment matrix, this proper vector be this level factor inferior with respect to last layer in the relative importance weights value of certain factor.Therefore, obtain corresponding weighted value according to matrix value, can comprise: according to weight matrix and matrix value Judgement Matricies; Calculate the product Mi of each row element of judgment matrix; Calculate the m th Root W ' of Mi i, m is the line number of judgment matrix; According to W ' iObtain characteristic vector W, W=(W1, W2, W3 ..., Wm), According to proper vector, obtain corresponding weighted value.Wherein,
Figure BDA00003557987100042
(i, j=1,2,3 ..., m);
Figure BDA00003557987100043
In the present embodiment, weighted value is verified, can be comprised: obtain the maximum characteristic root λ max of judgment matrix,
Figure BDA00003557987100044
(PW) i means i the element of vectorial PW, PW = ( PW ) 1 ( PW ) 2 · · · ( PW ) m = u 11 u 12 · · · u 1 m u 21 u 22 · · · u 2 m · · · · · · · · · · · · u m 1 u m 2 · · · u mn W 1 W 2 · · · W m According to CR = CI / RI CI = 1 m - 1 ( λ max - m ) Weighted value is verified, CR is that the random Consistency Ratio of judgment matrix: CI is the general coincident indicator of judgment matrix; RI is the mean random coincident indicator of judgment matrix.Wherein, RI can be provided by lot of experiments, and for the low order judgment matrix, the RI value is listed in table 2.
RI(1000 random result of table 2 mean random coincident indicator)
Exponent number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RI 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 1.45 1.49
For the judgment matrix higher than 12 rank, need to further consult reference materials or adopt approximation method.When exponent number≤2, matrix always has crash consistency; When exponent number was greater than 2, if CR<0.1, namely artificial judgment matrix had satisfied consistance, illustrated that it is rational that flexible strategy are distributed; Otherwise, just need to adjust judgment matrix, until obtain satisfied consistance.
Step 103, obtain respectively the independent assessment result of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in weight matrix.
In the present embodiment, geo-statistic analysis space method of interpolation is divided into the inverse distance weighted interpolation method, and in gram, golden method of interpolation etc., for the point-like vector data, as groundwater level depth, water-bearing zone thickness etc., carry out interpolation output grid categorical data to the point-like vector data.Raster data after interpolation is carried out to weight classification Ti, obtain the raster data of evaluation index weight classification Ti.Process flow diagram can be as shown in Figure 2.
Step 104, obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map according to target weight value and independent assessment result.
In the present embodiment, can respectively each factor of independent assessment result be multiplied by weighted value, obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map.After obtaining the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map, can by equivalent interval division, be 5 zones by it: fragility be hanged down district, fragility Jiao Di district, the medium district of fragility, fragility Jiao Gao district and the high district of fragility.Process flow diagram as shown in Figure 3.
In the present embodiment, the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation system is divided into three modules: to guide module, model computation module, modelling verification module.
To guide module: the guiding user carries out the setting of a series of model environment parameters.Comprise newly-built, open and hold function.This can guide the user to select groundwater type to guide module; And due to underground moisture three classes, the Evaluation of vulnerability index difference that every class underground water is corresponding, therefore can arrange evaluation index corresponding to three pages; Can represent the index of having chosen according to the setting of Evaluation of vulnerability index, and hide unchecked index.
Model computation module: system core module, can carry out the calculating that arranges of the calculating of each evaluation index and weight, and weighted stacking is calculated.Concrete, establishing the Groundwater Environmental Vulnerability Evaluation Assessment standard has p opinion rating, total n reference mark in study area, the first level factor that each reference mark will be considered has m individual, each the first level factor have again Ki (i=1,2,3 ..., m) individual the second level factor.Can build three aggregated(particle) structure models layer by layer: destination layer (fragility)-restraint layer (one-level factor of evaluation)-indicator layer (secondary factor of evaluation).
The Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, can be according to groundwater type, Evaluation of vulnerability index, determine target weight value and independent assessment result, thereby can obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map according to target weight value and independent assessment result, realize the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation.This technical scheme has solved the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation of carrying out due to the overlapped index method based on DRASTIC model or European model in the prior art, all is based on European Characteristics of Karst and sets up, and is not suitable for the problem of China.
Embodiment bis-:
As shown in Figure 4, the Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, the method is to shown in Figure 1 similar, and difference is, also comprises:
Step 105, figure verifies to the underground water Evaluation of vulnerability.
In the present embodiment, the process by step 104 is verified can comprise: verify according to single-factor pollution evaluation model; And/or verify according to the single-point comprehensive evaluation model; And/or verify according to tracer experiment.
Wherein, the process of verifying according to the single-factor contamination model comprises: obtain each single-point feature pollutant levels and corresponding Groundwater Vulnerability index in study area; Calculate the degree of correlation ρ of each single-point feature pollutant levels and corresponding Groundwater Vulnerability index, described
Figure BDA00003557987100064
N means sample size; D representation feature pollutant levels seniority among brothers and sisters and Groundwater Vulnerability index seniority among brothers and sisters ranking are poor; According to described correlation of indices degree ρ, determine the rationality of estimating.Wherein, related coefficient is used for estimating the correlativity between two variable X, Y, and wherein the correlativity between variable can be described with monotonic quantity.If in two set of two variable-values, all there are not two identical elements, so, when one of them variable can be expressed as the good monotonic quantity of another variable (variation tendency of two variablees is identical), the ρ between two variablees can reach+and 1 or-1.The absolute value of correlation coefficient ρ is larger, and correlativity is stronger, and related coefficient is more close to 1 or-1, and the degree of correlation is stronger, and related coefficient is more close to 0, and the degree of correlation is more weak.The rationality of estimating can be as shown in table 3, during relevant or strong correlation, thinks that evaluation result is reasonable in both sides relation is.
Table 3 ρ grade classification
Figure BDA00003557987100062
In the present embodiment, verify according to the single-point comprehensive evaluation model, can comprise: obtain single-factor pollution index I, described
Figure BDA00003557987100063
The measured concentration of a certain component of Ci-, μ g/L or mg/L; The background value of this component of C0i-; According to default grade form, obtain the score value F that each single-factor pollution index I is corresponding; According to described score value F, carry out single-point comprehensive evaluation, obtain the feature pollutant degree of each single-point; Calculate feature pollutant degree and the Groundwater Vulnerability correlation of indices degree ρ of each single-point, described
Figure 2013103138201100002BDA00003557987100064
N means sample size; D representation feature pollutant levels seniority among brothers and sisters and Groundwater Vulnerability index seniority among brothers and sisters ranking are poor;
According to described correlation of indices degree ρ, determine the rationality of estimating.
Groundwater contamination refers under the effect of human activity, and quality of groundwater is towards the phenomenon that worsens future development.As long as component concentration surpasses background value, all think and polluted.
When carrying out the groundwater environment pollution evaluation, first carry out the evaluation of single-point single-factor, then by the summation exponent method, carry out single-point comprehensive evaluation according to single-factor evaluation result (comprising inorganic single-factor evaluation and organic single-factor evaluation).Groundwater environment pollution evaluation inorganics adopts the underground water background value as estimating boundary value, and organism adopts groundwater quality to detect limit value as estimating boundary value.Single-point water pollution sorted table can be as shown in table 4.
Table 4 single-point water pollution sorted table
I≤1 Uncontaminated Do not surpass control value or background value
1<I≤5 The light pollution It is control value or background value 1～5 times
5<I≤10 Middle pollution Control value or background value 5～10 times
10<I≤50 Heavily contaminated Control value or background value 10～50 times
I>50 Severe contamination Be greater than control value or background value 50 times
When if background value is interval value (mainly for inorganic pollutant), value, in interval, makes I=1, if I is greater than the maximal value of interval value, or while being less than the minimum value of interval value, respectively by maximal value or the minimum value of Ci value divided by interval value.
For the very doubt area of the background value of underground water, carry out when inorganic pollution is estimated using control value as reference.Definite foundation in principle analysis of data the earliest of control value, the groundwater quality control value series that the area many in data, that the research degree is higher is set up can be used as neighboring region's control value serial reference and uses; To lacking the area of groundwater quality data, can determine or process according to three class water quality standards in " groundwater quality standard " according to the supplementary survey data statistics without obvious pollution source position in this district.
In the present embodiment, default grade form can be as shown in table 5.
Table 5 single-point water pollution grade form
I I≤1 1<I≤5 5<I≤10 10<I≤50 I>50
F 1 100 104 106 108
In the present embodiment, single-point comprehensive evaluation is by each single-point single-factor evaluation result summation, is shown below:
Figure BDA00003557987100081
According to the PI value, the groundwater environment pollution level can be fallen into 5 types: uncontaminated (I level), micro-pollution (II level), light pollute (III level), than heavily contaminated (IV level) and severe contamination (V level) five grades (in Table 6).
The regional water pollution modified result of table 6 table
Figure BDA00003557987100082
Process according to missing test is verified comprises: tracer agent is thrown at the place in two places, place of hydraulic connection to be verified, and another place receives described tracer agent; According to the tracer agent received, obtain and show the spike curve of time of arrival first; According to the symmetry of described spike curve, determine the rationality of estimating.
In the present embodiment, wanting to verify whether two places have the place of hydraulic connection, tracer agent is thrown at a place, and another place receives tracer agent.The tracer agent shown according to the spike curve is the waveform symmetry degree of time of arrival and spike curve first, illustrate whether two places exist underground pipeline, and hydraulic connection is verified the rationality of Evaluation of vulnerability figure.
In the present embodiment, can in the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation system that embodiment mono-provides, increase the modelling verification module: single-point comprehensive evaluation groundwater environment pollution evaluation result is as the checking foundation, and tracer experiment.
The Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, can be according to groundwater type, Evaluation of vulnerability index, determine target weight value and independent assessment result, thereby can obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map according to target weight value and independent assessment result, realize the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation.This technical scheme has solved the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation of carrying out due to the overlapped index method based on DRASTIC model or European model in the prior art, all is based on European Characteristics of Karst and sets up, and is not suitable for the problem of China.
The Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, can be applied in the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation system.
Through the above description of the embodiments, the those skilled in the art can be well understood to the present invention and can realize by the mode that software adds essential common hardware, can certainly pass through hardware, but in a lot of situation, the former is better embodiment.Based on such understanding, the part that technical scheme of the present invention contributes to prior art in essence in other words can embody with the form of software product, this computer software product is stored in the storage medium can read, floppy disk as computing machine, hard disk or CD etc., comprise some instructions with so that computer equipment (can be personal computer, server, or the network equipment etc.) carry out the described method of each embodiment of the present invention.
The above; be only the specific embodiment of the present invention, but protection scope of the present invention is not limited to this, anyly is familiar with those skilled in the art in the technical scope that the present invention discloses; the variation that can expect easily or replacement, within all should being encompassed in protection scope of the present invention.Therefore, protection scope of the present invention should be as the criterion with the protection domain of described claim.

Claims (11)

1. a Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method, is characterized in that, comprising:
According to boring, empirical value or field bailing test, obtain groundwater type, Evaluation of vulnerability index and parameter;
According to described Evaluation of vulnerability setup measures weight matrix, and obtain respectively the target weight value of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in described weight matrix;
Obtain respectively the independent assessment result of each Evaluation of vulnerability index in described weight matrix;
According to described target weight value and described independent assessment result, obtain the Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation map.
2. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described groundwater type comprises:
Hole diving, hole piestic water or karst water.
3. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described Evaluation of vulnerability index comprises: essential fragility index and/or special fragility index;
Described essential fragility index comprises: one or more in soil media, groundwater level depth, clean increment, aeration zone viscous soil horizon thickness, infiltration coefficient, water-bearing zone thickness and terrain slope;
Described special fragility index comprises: one or more in pollutant Transport And Transformation rule, drainage density, land use pattern and mining of groundwater degree.
4. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, the described target weight value of not obtaining each Evaluation of vulnerability index in described weight matrix comprises:
Obtain the matrix value of described weight matrix;
According to described matrix value, obtain corresponding weighted value;
Described weighted value is verified, be verified result;
Described the result shows when checking is not passed through, and again obtains the matrix value of described weight matrix, is verified until the result shows;
Described the result shows while being verified, the described weighted value be verified is made as to described target weight value.
5. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 4, is characterized in that, the described matrix value that obtains described weight matrix comprises:
Evaluation of vulnerability index in described weight matrix is compared in twos, obtain comparative result;
According to described comparative result, determine the matrix value of described weight matrix.
6. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 4, is characterized in that, describedly according to described matrix value, obtains corresponding weighted value, comprising:
According to described weight matrix and matrix value Judgement Matricies;
Calculate the product Mi of described each row element of judgment matrix;
Calculate the m th Root W' of described Mi i, described m is the line number of described judgment matrix;
According to described W' iObtain characteristic vector W, described W=(W1, W2, W3 ..., Wm), W i = W i &prime; / ( &Sigma; j = 1 m W j &prime; ) ;
According to described proper vector, obtain corresponding weighted value.
7. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 6, is characterized in that, described described weighted value verified, comprising:
Obtain the maximum characteristic root λ max of described judgment matrix, described
Figure FDA00003557987000022
Described (PW) i means i the element of vectorial PW, PW = ( PW ) 1 ( PW ) 2 &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; ( PW ) m = u 11 u 12 &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; u 1 m u 21 u 22 &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; u 2 m &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; u m 1 u m 2 &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; u mn W 1 W 2 &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; W m ;
According to CR = CI / RI CI = 1 m - 1 ( &lambda; max - m ) Described weighted value is verified, described CR is that the random Consistency Ratio of judgment matrix: CI is the general coincident indicator of judgment matrix; RI is the mean random coincident indicator of judgment matrix.
8. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described method also comprises:
According to single-factor pollution evaluation model, verify; And/or
According to the single-point comprehensive evaluation model, verify; And/or
According to tracer experiment, verify.
9. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 8, is characterized in that, describedly according to single-factor pollution evaluation model, verifies, comprising:
Obtain each single-point feature pollutant levels and corresponding Groundwater Vulnerability index in study area;
Calculate the degree of correlation ρ of each single-point feature pollutant levels and corresponding Groundwater Vulnerability index, described
Figure FDA00003557987000031
N means sample size; D representation feature pollutant levels seniority among brothers and sisters and Groundwater Vulnerability index seniority among brothers and sisters ranking are poor;
According to described correlation of indices degree ρ, determine the rationality of estimating.
10. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 8, is characterized in that, describedly according to the single-point comprehensive evaluation model, verifies, comprising:
Obtain single-factor pollution index I, described
Figure FDA00003557987000032
The measured concentration of a certain component of Ci-, μ g/L or mg/L; The background value of this component of C0i-;
According to default grade form, obtain the score value F that each single-factor pollution index I is corresponding;
According to described score value F, carry out single-point comprehensive evaluation, obtain the feature pollutant degree of each single-point;
Calculate feature pollutant degree and the Groundwater Vulnerability correlation of indices degree ρ of each single-point, described
Figure FDA00003557987000033
N means sample size; D representation feature pollutant levels seniority among brothers and sisters and Groundwater Vulnerability index seniority among brothers and sisters ranking are poor;
According to described correlation of indices degree ρ, determine the rationality of estimating.
11. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method according to claim 8, is characterized in that, describedly according to tracer experiment, verifies, comprising:
Tracer agent is thrown at a place in two places, place of hydraulic connection to be verified, and another place receives described tracer agent;
According to the tracer agent received, obtain and show the spike curve of time of arrival first;
According to the symmetry of described spike curve, determine the rationality of estimating.
CN201310313820.1A 2013-07-24 2013-07-24 Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water Active CN103412104B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310313820.1A CN103412104B (en) 2013-07-24 2013-07-24 Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310313820.1A CN103412104B (en) 2013-07-24 2013-07-24 Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN103412104A true CN103412104A (en) 2013-11-27
CN103412104B CN103412104B (en) 2015-07-15

Family

ID=49605130

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201310313820.1A Active CN103412104B (en) 2013-07-24 2013-07-24 Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN103412104B (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103744829A (en) * 2014-01-02 2014-04-23 环境保护部环境规划院 Underground water pollution prevention area dividing method
CN104063608A (en) * 2014-07-01 2014-09-24 天津市水文水资源勘测管理中心 Method of determining underground water controlled water level by utilizing risk evaluation
CN104614624A (en) * 2015-02-13 2015-05-13 东南大学 Power system vulnerability detecting method based on power communication interaction
CN104732448A (en) * 2014-04-23 2015-06-24 国家电网公司 Power grid infrastructure vulnerability evaluation method
CN105486828A (en) * 2015-11-28 2016-04-13 汪翔 Cultured aquatic product death monitoring method
CN105654236A (en) * 2015-12-29 2016-06-08 北京师范大学 Pollution risk evaluation method for underground water type drinking water source region
CN105938204A (en) * 2016-06-27 2016-09-14 浙江水利水电学院 Resistivity exploration method-based groundwater vulnerability assessment method
CN106526130A (en) * 2016-10-27 2017-03-22 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining comprehensive antifouling property of underground water
CN106919754A (en) * 2017-02-28 2017-07-04 中国环境科学研究院 A kind of evaluation method of region phreatic water specific vulnerability
CN107025498A (en) * 2017-03-24 2017-08-08 中国环境科学研究院 A kind of method for optimizing groundwater specific vulnerability assessment model
CN107038495A (en) * 2017-03-24 2017-08-11 中国环境科学研究院 A kind of method of inspection of Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation result
CN107525907A (en) * 2017-10-16 2017-12-29 中国环境科学研究院 Underground water pollution monitoring net Multipurpose Optimal Method
CN109034656A (en) * 2018-08-21 2018-12-18 北京师范大学 A kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method
CN110122408A (en) * 2019-06-14 2019-08-16 北京机械设备研究所 A kind of automatic detection processing device of fish jar and the automatic detection processing method of fish jar
CN113506042A (en) * 2021-08-06 2021-10-15 中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所 Method for grading recovery suitability of fresh water wetland in delta region
CN115239127A (en) * 2022-07-20 2022-10-25 西南交通大学 Ecological vulnerability evaluation method, computer device, storage medium and verification method

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101699451A (en) * 2009-05-08 2010-04-28 中国矿业大学(北京) Novel practical method frangibility index method for evaluating seam floor water inrush
CN102073952A (en) * 2011-03-07 2011-05-25 北京师范大学 Water resource bearing capacity evaluation method
CN102129515A (en) * 2011-03-07 2011-07-20 北京师范大学 Method for evaluating fragility of water resource under climatic change
CN102253423A (en) * 2011-03-25 2011-11-23 南京师范大学 Proper water supply position intelligent recognition technology based on multi-source hydrogeology survey information
CN102749435A (en) * 2012-07-20 2012-10-24 陕西省电力设计院 Rapid evaluation method for landslide stability of accumulated layer
CN102999709A (en) * 2012-12-20 2013-03-27 中国环境科学研究院 Underground water grading and zoning evaluation method in agricultural activity area

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101699451A (en) * 2009-05-08 2010-04-28 中国矿业大学(北京) Novel practical method frangibility index method for evaluating seam floor water inrush
CN102073952A (en) * 2011-03-07 2011-05-25 北京师范大学 Water resource bearing capacity evaluation method
CN102129515A (en) * 2011-03-07 2011-07-20 北京师范大学 Method for evaluating fragility of water resource under climatic change
CN102253423A (en) * 2011-03-25 2011-11-23 南京师范大学 Proper water supply position intelligent recognition technology based on multi-source hydrogeology survey information
CN102749435A (en) * 2012-07-20 2012-10-24 陕西省电力设计院 Rapid evaluation method for landslide stability of accumulated layer
CN102999709A (en) * 2012-12-20 2013-03-27 中国环境科学研究院 Underground water grading and zoning evaluation method in agricultural activity area

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
方樟 等: "松嫩平原地下水脆弱性模糊综合评价", 《吉林大学学报（地球科学版）》, vol. 37, no. 3, 31 May 2007 (2007-05-31) *
王红旗 等: "顺义区地下水水源地脆弱性评价", 《环境工程学报》, vol. 3, no. 4, 30 April 2009 (2009-04-30) *

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103744829A (en) * 2014-01-02 2014-04-23 环境保护部环境规划院 Underground water pollution prevention area dividing method
CN104732448A (en) * 2014-04-23 2015-06-24 国家电网公司 Power grid infrastructure vulnerability evaluation method
CN104063608A (en) * 2014-07-01 2014-09-24 天津市水文水资源勘测管理中心 Method of determining underground water controlled water level by utilizing risk evaluation
CN104063608B (en) * 2014-07-01 2017-02-01 天津市水文水资源勘测管理中心 Method of determining underground water controlled water level by utilizing risk evaluation
CN104614624A (en) * 2015-02-13 2015-05-13 东南大学 Power system vulnerability detecting method based on power communication interaction
CN105486828A (en) * 2015-11-28 2016-04-13 汪翔 Cultured aquatic product death monitoring method
CN105654236A (en) * 2015-12-29 2016-06-08 北京师范大学 Pollution risk evaluation method for underground water type drinking water source region
CN105654236B (en) * 2015-12-29 2020-01-14 北京师范大学 Underground water type drinking water source pollution risk evaluation method
CN105938204B (en) * 2016-06-27 2018-06-15 浙江水利水电学院 A kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method based on electric resistivity exploration method
CN105938204A (en) * 2016-06-27 2016-09-14 浙江水利水电学院 Resistivity exploration method-based groundwater vulnerability assessment method
CN106526130A (en) * 2016-10-27 2017-03-22 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining comprehensive antifouling property of underground water
CN106919754A (en) * 2017-02-28 2017-07-04 中国环境科学研究院 A kind of evaluation method of region phreatic water specific vulnerability
CN107025498A (en) * 2017-03-24 2017-08-08 中国环境科学研究院 A kind of method for optimizing groundwater specific vulnerability assessment model
CN107038495A (en) * 2017-03-24 2017-08-11 中国环境科学研究院 A kind of method of inspection of Groundwater Vulnerability evaluation result
CN107025498B (en) * 2017-03-24 2022-05-17 中国环境科学研究院 Method for optimizing underground water special vulnerability evaluation model
CN107525907A (en) * 2017-10-16 2017-12-29 中国环境科学研究院 Underground water pollution monitoring net Multipurpose Optimal Method
CN107525907B (en) * 2017-10-16 2019-12-31 中国环境科学研究院 Multi-objective optimization method for underground water pollution monitoring network
CN109034656A (en) * 2018-08-21 2018-12-18 北京师范大学 A kind of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Method
CN110122408A (en) * 2019-06-14 2019-08-16 北京机械设备研究所 A kind of automatic detection processing device of fish jar and the automatic detection processing method of fish jar
CN110122408B (en) * 2019-06-14 2021-11-23 北京机械设备研究所 Automatic detection processing device and method for fish tank
CN113506042A (en) * 2021-08-06 2021-10-15 中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所 Method for grading recovery suitability of fresh water wetland in delta region
CN115239127A (en) * 2022-07-20 2022-10-25 西南交通大学 Ecological vulnerability evaluation method, computer device, storage medium and verification method
CN115239127B (en) * 2022-07-20 2023-05-26 西南交通大学 Ecological vulnerability assessment method, computer device, storage medium, and verification method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103412104B (en) 2015-07-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103412104B (en) Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water
De Moel et al. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands
Vorogushyn et al. A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches
Scussolini et al. Adaptation to sea level rise: a multidisciplinary analysis for Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
CN105654236B (en) Underground water type drinking water source pollution risk evaluation method
Cellura et al. Wind speed spatial estimation for energy planning in Sicily: Introduction and statistical analysis
CN107145672B (en) Method and system for evaluating vulnerability and pollution risk of underground water in plain river network area
CN107025498B (en) Method for optimizing underground water special vulnerability evaluation model
Chen et al. Assessing the effects of land use changes on non-point source pollution reduction for the Three Gorges Watershed using the SWAT model
Min et al. Simulating short‐circuiting flow in a constructed wetland: the implications of bathymetry and vegetation effects
Rman et al. Potentials of transboundary thermal water resources in the western part of the Pannonian basin
Wang et al. Spatial scale effect on seasonal streamflows in permafrost catchments on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
Moghaddam et al. A framework for the assessment of qualitative and quantitative sustainable development of groundwater system
Zeynolabedin et al. The SIVI index: a comprehensive approach for investigating seawater intrusion vulnerability for island and coastal aquifers
Sutherland et al. Vulnerability of coastal defences to climate change
Andradóttir et al. Characterization of residence time variability in a managed monomictic reservoir
Miao et al. Simulation of seawater intrusion and optimization of cutoff wall schemes based on surrogate model
Karimaei Tabarestani et al. Reliability-based design and sensitivity analysis of rock armors for rubble-mound breakwater
Wu et al. The assessment of river ecology and habitat using a two-dimensional hydrodynamic and habitat model
Zhou et al. Numerical modeling of tidal effects on groundwater dynamics in a multi-layered estuary aquifer system using equivalent tidal loading boundary condition: case study in Zhanjiang, China
Logan et al. Water temperature duration curves for thermoelectric power plant mixing zone analysis
Zhu et al. Slope stability from a hydrological perspective: taking typical soil slope as an example
Koks et al. Comparing extreme rainfall and large-scale flooding induced inundation risk–evidence from a Dutch case-study
Young et al. Surface water-groundwater interaction issues in Texas
Duan et al. Optimizing a coastal monitoring network using a water-quality response grid (WRG)-based sampling design for improved reliability and efficiency

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant