CN102427222A - Verification processing method for relaying protection setting value - Google Patents
Verification processing method for relaying protection setting value Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102427222A CN102427222A CN2011102957343A CN201110295734A CN102427222A CN 102427222 A CN102427222 A CN 102427222A CN 2011102957343 A CN2011102957343 A CN 2011102957343A CN 201110295734 A CN201110295734 A CN 201110295734A CN 102427222 A CN102427222 A CN 102427222A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- protection
- risk
- value
- protections
- tripping
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a verification processing method for a relaying protection setting value. The method comprises the following steps of: reading the real time data of a power grid from an energy management system, and forming a current system running mode; in the current system running mode, performing online verification calculation on a protection setting value of the power grid to judge whether protections which do not meet verification requirements exist or not; if the protections which do not meet the verification requirements exist, forming a set of the protections which do not meet the verification requirements; calculating the probabilities and results of failure to operate on command of each protection in the set, and multiplying corresponding probabilities and results to obtain values-at-risk of failure to operate on command of the protections; calculating the false operation probabilities and results of each protection in the set, and multiplying corresponding probabilities and results to obtain false operation values-at-risk of the protections; calculating the weighted sums of the values-at-risk of failure to operate on command and false operation values-at-risk of the protections to obtain total values-at-risk of the protections; and rearranging the total values-at-risk of all the protections in the set from lower values to higher values.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the technical field of relay protection of AC transmission system, more particularly, the present invention relates to a kind of check processing method of relay protection constant value.
Background technology
The main feature of China's electrical network is that operational mode is flexible, fault type is complicated, equivalent impedance changes and load fluctuation etc.; These factors are adjusted for the relaying protection off-line and are brought immense pressure and challenge: in case the discontented foot protection requirement of definite value occurs; Protection just possibly broken down, and then causes power grid accident.
To above problem, the constant value on-line check method is widely used in China's electrical network.Constant value on-line check utilizes the Power System Real-time data of EMS collection to come the performance of all protections of judgement system under real time operation mode.In case exist protection tripping/malfunction hidden danger online, online check method will provide warning message.Since the notion of online check proposed, the relaying protection worker and the software for calculation developer that adjusts had carried out a large amount of research, and have developed the corresponding online nucleus correcting system.
Yet along with the deep application of online nucleus correcting system at electrical network, the staff faces a such difficult problem: for provincial or region class electrical network in large scale, that operational mode is changeable; It is many that check calculates the number that does not satisfy the protection of checking requirement; The staff needs at short notice the definite value of all protections to be revised, and manual work is carried out but the order of priority of definite value correction places one's entire reliance upon, the lack of scientific foundation; The enforcement difficulty is big, and efficient is lower.
Summary of the invention
In view of this; The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of check processing method of relay protection constant value; It after check calculating is accomplished, automatically needs is implemented the definite value correction and serializing is carried out in perfect protection, thereby helps relaying protection staff and the quick rational definite value maintenance scheme of formulation of management and running personnel and mode to arrange strategy.
The invention provides a kind of check processing method of relay protection constant value, may further comprise the steps: read the real time data of the electrical network that EMS passes over, form current system operation mode; Under current system operation mode; The protection definite value of electrical network is carried out online check calculate, check the protection that requires, check the protection that requires if exist not satisfy to determine whether to exist not satisfy; Then will not satisfy and check the set of protection formation that requires; The tripping probability of each protection in the set of computations and tripping consequence, and both multiply by the tripping value-at-risk that is protected, the malfunction probability of each protection in the set of computations and malfunction consequence mutually; And both multiply by mutually the malfunction value-at-risk that is protected; The tripping value-at-risk and the malfunction value-at-risk of protection are carried out weighted sum,, the overall risk value of all protections in the set is arranged according to order from big to small again with the overall risk value that is protected.
The check processing method of relay protection constant value of the present invention has the following advantages:
1) in many satisfied quantification orderings of making check result in the protection that requires rapidly of checking, helps the staff and in time make the relevant strategy of assisting;
2) be easy to expose protection hidden danger under the extreme operational mode, be easy to find definite value and electrical network weak link, help to promote the fail safe and the reliability of electric power system;
3) this invention is not limited by scale of power basically, but its effect is more obvious with advantage in the domain type electrical network wide in compass of competency, that changes of operating modes is big;
4) the present invention helps relaying protection staff and management and running personnel to formulate rational definite value maintenance scheme and mode fast to arrange the strategy can; Reduced staff's labour intensity; Improve the reasonability that power system operating mode is arranged simultaneously, helped to promote the practicalization of relay protection on-line check system.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of the check processing method of relay protection constant value of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is the analysis sketch map of tripping probability.
Fig. 3 is the analysis sketch map of malfunction probability.
Embodiment
As shown in Figure 1, the check processing method of relay protection constant value of the present invention may further comprise the steps:
(1) reads the real time data of the electrical network that EMS passes over, form current system operation mode;
(2) under said current system operation mode, the protection definite value of said electrical network is carried out online check calculate, check the protection that requires to determine whether to exist not satisfy;
(3) if there is the dissatisfied protection that requires of checking, then will not satisfy and check the set of protection formation that requires, change step (4) then over to; Do not check the protection that requires if do not exist not satisfy, then check processing method and finish;
(4) calculate the tripping probability and the tripping consequence of each protection in the said set, and both multiply by the tripping value-at-risk that obtains said protection mutually;
(5) calculate the malfunction probability and the malfunction consequence of each protection in the said set, and both multiply by the malfunction value-at-risk that obtains said protection mutually;
(6) the tripping value-at-risk and the malfunction value-at-risk of said protection are carried out weighted sum, to obtain the overall risk value of said protection;
(7) the overall risk value of all protections in the said set is arranged according to order from big to small again.
In step (2), mainly be that the protection range according to the operate time of protecting, definite value, the sensitivity of definite value require to wait the protection that determines whether to exist satisfied check to require.
As shown in Figure 2, describe above-mentioned steps (4) in detail below in conjunction with example:
Suppose that this circuit is designated as circuit AB and BC respectively with adjacent lines in the electrical network, the distance protection of configuration is respectively R
1And R
2, below with the protection R
1Be that example is calculated its tripping value-at-risk apart from the II section:
(41) confirm R
1The tripping probability
Z among the figure
LmBe guarantor's Calculation of Sensitivity definite value,
Be R
1Apart from II section actual motion definite value; The check requirement is not satisfied in sensitivity, is equivalent to
Both are pressed sensitivity coefficient K
LmBe mapped as protection range L after the scaled down respectively
LmWith
Wherein, L
Lm=Z
Lm/ K
Lm,
Be that protection range is contracted to the AD section by the AB section, shadow section (DB section) is protection tripping scope.Finally, R
1Tripping scope and tripping probability are:
Wherein, P
Sen(n) be R
1The tripping scope, P
SenBe R
1The tripping probability;
Be circuit AB impedance; T is the EMS Data Update cycle; λ
ABBe the failure rate of circuit AB in time T,, can replace, obtain through historical record by the frequency that fault takes place because timing statistics is shorter.
(42) confirm R
1The tripping consequence
The tripping consequence is to be represented by the relative load loss that tripping causes.Suppose under previous mode R
1The real-time load crossed of online AB and upper level link tester be respectively c
ABAnd c
Pre, can from the real time data file that EMS sends over, obtain; AB breaks down when circuit, should be by R
1Action, load loss is c
ABBut, cause its upper level protection R because sensitivity is not enough
1Action, the load of result's loss becomes c
PreR then
1The tripping consequence is:
c
sen=|c
pre-c
AB|/c
N (3)
Wherein, c
SenBe R
1The tripping consequence; c
NFor the whole network load fiducial value, characterize with active power.
(43) confirm R
1The tripping value-at-risk
By above-mentioned steps (41) and (42),, can obtain R in conjunction with the definition of risk
1The risk R that checks protection tripping when requiring is not satisfied in sensitivity
SenFor:
R
sen=P
sen?c
sen (4)
Promptly obtain R
1The risk of tripping; Check risk, method and above-mentioned similar for the sensitivity of III section.
As shown in Figure 3, describe above-mentioned steps (5) in detail below in conjunction with example:
Suppose that this circuit is designated as circuit AB and BC respectively with adjacent lines in the electrical network, the distance protection of configuration is respectively R
1And R
2, below with the protection R
1Apart from II section and adjacent protection R
2Apart from the cooperation of I section is that example is calculated R
1The malfunction value-at-risk:
(51) confirm R
1The malfunction probability
Z
JsCalculate definite value for protecting to protecting selectivity,
Be R
1Apart from II section actual motion definite value; Selectivity does not satisfy checks requirement, is equivalent to
With Z
JsWith
Corresponding scope is in the reduction of safety factor ratio, i.e. Z
JsCorresponding A D section
Corresponding A E section
Shadow section among the figure (DE section) is for protection malfunction scope, so R
1Malfunction scope and malfunction probability are:
Wherein, P
Sel(n) be R
1The malfunction scope, P
SenBe R
1The malfunction probability;
Be circuit BC impedance; K
kBe safety factor; K
Fz minFor helping, minimum under the current system operation mode increases coefficient;
Be R
2Apart from I section definite value; λ
BCBe the failure rate of circuit BC in time T.
Other matching principles in the distance protection such as joining, cooperate apart from the II section apart from II section and adjacent lines being vertical, cooperate with adjacent lines II section, III section apart from the III section, and its selectivity check method and malfunction probability are all with above-mentioned similar.
(52) confirm R
1The malfunction consequence
The malfunction consequence is represented with the relative load loss that malfunction causes.Suppose under previous mode R
2The real-time load that passes through of online BC be c
BCBC breaks down when circuit, because fault drops on protection R
1In the weak scope that cooperates with it, cause R
1Malfunction, its consequence is:
c
sel=|c
AB-c
BC|/c
N (7)
Wherein, c
SelBe R
1The malfunction consequence.
(53) confirm R
1The malfunction value-at-risk
By above-mentioned steps (51) and (52),, can obtain R in conjunction with the definition of risk
1Selectivity does not satisfy the risk R that checks protection malfunction when requiring
SelFor:
R
sel=P
sel?c
sel (8)
Below still with protection R
1Be example, describe above-mentioned steps (6) in detail.
Protection R
1The overall risk value be:
R=δ
senγ
senR
sen+δ
selγ
sel·max{R
sel(j)},1≤j≤m (9)
Wherein, R is protection R
1The overall risk value; δ
SenAnd δ
SelBe the sign coefficient: satisfy if sensitivity is checked, then δ
SenGet 0, otherwise get 1; If checking, selectivity satisfies, then δ
SelGet 0, otherwise get 1; γ
SenAnd γ
SelBe respectively sensitivity and selectivity weight coefficient, scope is 0~1, and γ
Sen+ γ
Sel=1, both balances need combine the concrete power grid environment at this circuit place; Work as R
1Cooperation circuit when having many, R
1Need to carry out selectivity with each mating protection and check, as long as m representes that selectivity does not satisfy (mating protection) number of checking requirement, and is visible m>0, then δ
SelJust get 1.
The present invention is not limited to above-mentioned embodiment; Persons skilled in the art are according to specification and the disclosed content of accompanying drawing; Can adopt other multiple embodiment embodiment of the present invention, therefore, every employing thinking of the present invention; Do some simple designs that change or change, all fall into the scope of the present invention's protection.
Claims (1)
1. the check processing method of a relay protection constant value may further comprise the steps:
Read the real time data of the electrical network that EMS passes over, form current system operation mode;
Under said current system operation mode, the protection definite value of said electrical network is carried out online check calculate, check the protection that requires to determine whether to exist not satisfy;
If there is the dissatisfied protection that requires of checking, then will do not satisfy and check the set of protection formation that requires;
Calculate the tripping probability and the tripping consequence of each protection in the said set, and both multiply by the tripping value-at-risk that obtains said protection mutually;
Calculate the malfunction probability and the malfunction consequence of each protection in the said set, and both multiply by the malfunction value-at-risk that obtains said protection mutually;
The tripping value-at-risk and the malfunction value-at-risk of said protection are carried out weighted sum, to obtain the overall risk value of said protection;
The overall risk value of all protections in the said set is arranged according to order from big to small again.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2011102957343A CN102427222A (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2011-09-28 | Verification processing method for relaying protection setting value |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2011102957343A CN102427222A (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2011-09-28 | Verification processing method for relaying protection setting value |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN102427222A true CN102427222A (en) | 2012-04-25 |
Family
ID=45961172
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN2011102957343A Pending CN102427222A (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2011-09-28 | Verification processing method for relaying protection setting value |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN102427222A (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103474972A (en) * | 2013-08-28 | 2013-12-25 | 广东电网公司电力调度控制中心 | Online setting calculation method for relay protection |
CN103580010A (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2014-02-12 | 华北电力大学 | Area protection system and fault identification method based on distance protection fitting factor |
CN104242260A (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2014-12-24 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Constant time-lag constant value optimizing method based on risk indicators |
CN104901277A (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2015-09-09 | 太原理工大学 | Relay protection on-line check sequence ordering method based on branch circuit importance degree |
CN106385014A (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2017-02-08 | 华中科技大学 | Relay protection distance setting value check method based on measured impedance |
CN111766464A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2020-10-13 | 积成电子股份有限公司 | Method and system for automatically testing fixed value conformance of substation relay protection device |
CN111766848A (en) * | 2020-06-29 | 2020-10-13 | 北京广利核系统工程有限公司 | Method and device for verifying failure rate of subsystem in instrument control system |
CN112381423A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-02-19 | 国网宁夏电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Power grid cascading failure risk assessment method considering relay protection refusal influence |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101714780A (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2010-05-26 | 上海思南电力通信有限公司 | Relay protection running management information system |
-
2011
- 2011-09-28 CN CN2011102957343A patent/CN102427222A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101714780A (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2010-05-26 | 上海思南电力通信有限公司 | Relay protection running management information system |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
A.G.PHADKE,J.S.THORP: "《Expose Hidden Failures to Prevent Cascading Outages》", 《IEEE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN POWER》 * |
曾耿晖等: "《电力系统继电保护定值的在线校核》", 《继电器》 * |
沈智健等: "《距离保护运行风险评估模型》", 《电力系统自动化》 * |
陈为化等: "《考虑继电保护隐性故障的电力系统连锁故障风险评估》", 《电网技术》 * |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103474972B (en) * | 2013-08-28 | 2016-04-13 | 广东电网公司电力调度控制中心 | A kind of relaying protection on-line setting method |
CN103474972A (en) * | 2013-08-28 | 2013-12-25 | 广东电网公司电力调度控制中心 | Online setting calculation method for relay protection |
CN103580010A (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2014-02-12 | 华北电力大学 | Area protection system and fault identification method based on distance protection fitting factor |
CN103580010B (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2015-12-09 | 华北电力大学 | Area protection system and the fault recognition method of the factor is agreed with based on distance protection |
CN104242260A (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2014-12-24 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Constant time-lag constant value optimizing method based on risk indicators |
CN104901277B (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2017-08-04 | 太原理工大学 | Relay protection on-line check order sort method based on branch road importance |
CN104901277A (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2015-09-09 | 太原理工大学 | Relay protection on-line check sequence ordering method based on branch circuit importance degree |
CN106385014A (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2017-02-08 | 华中科技大学 | Relay protection distance setting value check method based on measured impedance |
CN111766464A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2020-10-13 | 积成电子股份有限公司 | Method and system for automatically testing fixed value conformance of substation relay protection device |
CN111766464B (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2023-09-05 | 积成电子股份有限公司 | Automatic testing method and system for fixed value compliance of relay protection device of transformer substation |
CN111766848A (en) * | 2020-06-29 | 2020-10-13 | 北京广利核系统工程有限公司 | Method and device for verifying failure rate of subsystem in instrument control system |
CN112381423A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-02-19 | 国网宁夏电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Power grid cascading failure risk assessment method considering relay protection refusal influence |
CN112381423B (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2022-05-06 | 国网宁夏电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Power grid cascading failure risk assessment method considering relay protection refusal influence |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102427222A (en) | Verification processing method for relaying protection setting value | |
CN102368610B (en) | Evaluation method based on distribution system security region | |
CN101640418B (en) | Identification method of transient state stable key transmission cross-section of electric power system fault | |
CN103440400B (en) | Power system short-term risk determination method taking disaster factors into account | |
CN104063750B (en) | The Forecasting Methodology of the disaster-stricken influence of power system based on the anti-entropy weight of advanced AHP | |
CN102013085A (en) | Evaluation method for distribution network reliability | |
CN102590651B (en) | Measured lightning data-based transmission line failure probability evaluation method | |
CN104901306B (en) | Power grid operation safety margin calculating method taking cascading faults into consideration | |
CN103246936A (en) | System and method for pre-warning of typhoon risks of overhead transmission lines of grid | |
CN104391086B (en) | Transformer external environment condition humidity parameter measuring method and system | |
CN106611245A (en) | GIS-based typhoon disaster risk assessment method for power grid | |
CN105022893A (en) | Fault analysis method of alternating current charging post system | |
CN104599023A (en) | Typhoon weather transmission line time-variant reliability calculation method and risk evaluation system | |
CN102915515A (en) | Cascade outage recognition and risk evaluation method of power grid | |
CN106780145A (en) | A kind of appraisal procedure of relay protection Supportability Evaluation index system | |
CN102945317A (en) | Reliability assessment method for relay protection device in consideration of software and human factors | |
CN101923685A (en) | System and method for deciding power shedding load based on line breaking fault rate prediction | |
CN108595872A (en) | A kind of powernet security and stability analysis method | |
Liu et al. | A sequentially preventive model enhancing power system resilience against extreme-weather-triggered failures | |
CN104346691A (en) | Power enterprise field operation risk analysis method based on fault tree analysis | |
CN116012189A (en) | Electric power facility flood disaster-stricken space heterogeneity analysis method and system | |
CN107274634B (en) | Precipitation Secondary Geological Hazards alarm calculation method and system along a kind of transmission line of electricity | |
Kim et al. | A study on the system improvement for efficient management of large-scale complex disaster | |
CN102570447B (en) | Development stage division method for power grid | |
CN104836329B (en) | Local-level dispatch supporting system capable of improving analyzing and processing capability of dispatcher during accident generation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C12 | Rejection of a patent application after its publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20120425 |