CN102136103A - Natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation method and system - Google Patents
Natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102136103A CN102136103A CN2011100594256A CN201110059425A CN102136103A CN 102136103 A CN102136103 A CN 102136103A CN 2011100594256 A CN2011100594256 A CN 2011100594256A CN 201110059425 A CN201110059425 A CN 201110059425A CN 102136103 A CN102136103 A CN 102136103A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- index
- data
- evaluation
- area
- habitat
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a system for quantitatively evaluating natural preservation area management effectiveness. The method comprises the following steps: obtaining environmental and ecological data of a natural preservation area by measures such as a remote sensing satellite and field survey and the like, determining a natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation indexes system by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process and an expert scoring method, determining index intension and a quantitative measuring method of the index intension so as to be convenient for quantitative evaluation of the future preservation area; conducting inversion to index values of NPP (net primary productivity), vegetation coverage, a typical habitat dominance and habitat degradation indexes and the like by utilizing the remote sensing data; measuring management measures and social impact rule layer correlation indexes by utilizing ground investigation data; determining all index permissions by utilizing the analytic hierarchy process, and conducting weighting summation to measure all natural preservation area evaluation values; and determining an evaluation criterion, and conducting evaluation grading to the natural preservation area based on the standard. In the invention, the natural preservation area evaluation quantitative performance and representativeness are realized, so as to be beneficial to realization of on-line evaluation to the natural preservation area subsequently according to the category of the natural preservation areas.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to ecological environmental protection and remote sensing technology field, particularly a kind of wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating and system.
Background technology
Along with Development of China's Natural Reserves; management work to the wilderness area is had higher requirement, and presses for managerial effectiveness and science that a cover science and managerial effectiveness assessment indicator system that be easy to obtain, quantitative are estimated the wilderness area.
At present; most researchists are many according to methods such as WB/WWF trace tools; evaluation index is divided into several state descriptions; and give certain score value respectively to fabulous (or differ to outstanding) by difference; make qualitative question transfer to and quantize the assignment method; calculate PTS then, and then the protected location managerial effectiveness is estimated.This qualitative managerial effectiveness assessment, but easy operating is easy to datumization, the convenient protected location is managed estimated, and wilderness area managerial effectiveness evaluation is widely used.But qualitative evaluating method in this; quantification to index has bigger artificial property, in simultaneously managerial effectiveness being estimated, and too much consideration ladder of management and method evaluation; and less to the management effect evaluation index, especially consider less to the protection factor of species and ecological functions by protection.Study the basis if can put the former in order, realize to reduce human factor, objective system quantitative evaluation is carried out in the wilderness area, invention one cover can that quantize, science, more comprehensive managerial effectiveness evaluation index, is crucial part.
The inventor finds that there is following technological deficiency at least in traditional assessment indicator system in realizing process of the present invention: the quantification of index has bigger artificial property; Ecological functions feedback protection effect relates to deficiency in the managerial effectiveness evaluation.Tracing it to its cause is that traditional qualitative evaluation pattern more easily implements, and more in addition evaluation index more is the evaluation that lays particular emphasis on ladder of management, the short-term managerial effectiveness of concern.And the wilderness area managerial effectiveness will embody long-term benefit, and is not enough if ecological functions and species resource protection effect thereof embody in managerial effectiveness is estimated, and may cause the short-term effect and the uncontinuity of evaluation result; If the human factor influence is more, may cause the unfounded property of evaluation result.And then do not reach the purpose of evaluation.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of this invention is to provide a kind of wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating and system, realize that the online quantitative evaluation of carrying out the wilderness area by the protected location classification for follow-up realization lays the foundation to wilderness area managerial effectiveness quantitative evaluation.
The embodiment of the invention provides a kind of wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating, comprising:
Step 2, the wilderness area quantitative evaluation index system of utilizing analytical hierarchy process and expert's scoring to determine are determined the index intension and are quantitatively measured the calculation method;
Step 3, utilize remotely-sensed data inverting NPP, vegetation coverage, typical habitats dominance, habitat deterioration index etc. to refer to target values;
Step 4, utilize the ground investigation data volume to calculate control measures, the relevant concrete evaluation index of social influence rule layer;
Step 6, determine evaluation criterion, on-line evaluation is carried out in the wilderness area based on standard.
In the described step 2, described definite wilderness area quantitative evaluation index system and index intension thereof and quantitative amount calculation method comprise: the professional and technical personnel's proportion in the control measures, protectiveness efficiency in the use of funds, scientific research project drop into four-indexes such as frequency, the intension of amount, illegal incidents and quantitatively measure the calculation method; The five fingers mark, intension such as the protection of goal degree of protection in the effect (population that comprises the protection of goal species of species wilderness area changes and the endangered species quantity or the species richness of ecosystem class), typical habitats dominance, habitat deterioration index, vegetation coverage, NPP and quantitatively measure the calculation method; Three indexs, intension such as the Community Participation in the social influence, social recognition rate, average annual travel person-time and quantitatively measure the calculation method.
In the described step 3, describedly utilize finger target values such as remotely-sensed data inverting NPP, vegetation coverage, typical habitats dominance, habitat deterioration index to be meant to utilize remotely-sensed data to generate vegetation index (NDVI); And climatological datas such as the medial temperature in corresponding month, average precipitation, total solar radiation, net radiation are carried out space interpolation handle, generate and NDVI pixel raster data of the same size; Generate data such as vegetation pattern, coverage distribution, main habitat area, habitat degeneration area, NPP on this basis, and calculate by corresponding index amount calculation method.
In the described step 6, described evaluation criterion is that the overall merit score is carried out grade scale and the classification of every specific targets evaluation criterion.
The embodiment of the invention provides a kind of wilderness area managerial effectiveness Quantitative Evaluation System, it is characterized in that, comprising: data input module, data processing module, evaluation index amount are calculated module, managerial effectiveness is estimated diversity module;
Described data input module is used for the online input of enquiry data and remote sensing thematic data, and deposit data is in the specified memory of computing machine, so that other module is carried out subsequent treatment.
Described data processing module, be used for to the remote sensing thematic data and the enquiry data of input verify, remote sensing image processing so that the index parameters such as NPP that obtain valid data and comprise the target image in the study area.The data validity of checking input at first is then according to the remote sensing thematic data of input and investigation statistics its total NPP, average N PP, average coverage, each vegetation pattern coverage, habitat degeneration area, habitat area etc.
Described evaluation index amount is calculated module, is used for data are handled data after the statistics according to each index amount method of calculationing, carries out index quantification calculating.At first utilize each index amount to calculate algorithm, calculate score separately; Then each desired value be multiply by weight separately, carry out accumulation calculating, and multiply by its rule layer weight, get its protected location managerial effectiveness score by its rule layer.
Described managerial effectiveness is estimated diversity module, is used for realizing the wilderness area managerial effectiveness is estimated classification.Utilize and estimate grade scale, each specific targets score and PTS are carried out classification.
Description of drawings
The treatment scheme synoptic diagram of the wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating that Fig. 1 provides for the embodiment of the invention one;
The wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating assessment indicator system that Fig. 2 provides for the invention process one;
Fig. 3 estimates each index standard of classification for the wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating that the invention process one provides.
Fig. 4 is the software architecture synoptic diagram of the wilderness area managerial effectiveness Quantitative Evaluation System that provides of the embodiment of the invention two;
Embodiment
Below by drawings and Examples, technical scheme of the present invention is described in further detail.
The schematic flow sheet of the wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating that Fig. 1 provides for the embodiment of the invention one, as shown in Figure 1, present embodiment mainly may further comprise the steps:
Table 1 is an assessment indicator system, and the intension and the computing method of invention index are as follows:
Professional and technical personnel's proportion, this index reflect that mainly object is laid special stress on protecting in the wilderness area implements the science and technology support ability that validity protection can provide.Generally speaking, the professional and technical personnel is many more, reflects that available science and technology support ability is strong more.Account for the number percent of whole wilderness area total number of persons by professional and technical personnel's (senior engineer, slip-stick artist's number).Concrete computing formula is as follows:
Protectiveness efficiency in the use of funds, this index mainly are to be actually used in protected location protection facility, material, an operating position of providing funds such as to patrol by reflection.Be by being used to protect Facilities Construction (as protection station, fencing material, instrument and equipment etc.) and the expense expenditure that patrols to account for the number percent of protected location year total expenditure.Concrete computing formula is as follows:
Scientific research project drops into amount, and this index is meant that being used for the wilderness area receives external finances such as colleges and universities, R﹠D institution to be used for the relevant input amount (scientific research item funds, scientific base construction etc.) of scientific research.Main reflection wilderness area by with singly carry out measure such as scientific research cooperative outward, strengthen the capabilities of technical support to the protection of species and natural ecosystems thereof.
The frequency of illegal incidents, this index mainly are the protected locations in implementing the protection process, reflect wilderness area laws and regulations implementation status and ability to supervise by the etesian number of times of illegal incidents (frequency).Specifically be meant in implementing the protection process the annual number of times of violating the Nature Reserve conservation regulation that disturbs owing to government, resident etc.
Rare and endangered species quantity is meant rare and endangered species owing to be protected, the degree that quantity increases.Concrete computing formula is as follows:
In the formula, ESI is the rare and endangered species quantity, w
iBe meant i class weight that vegeto-animal protection level in imminent danger is paid, x
iBe meant the quantity of present i class endangered species, x
0Protected location original i class endangered species quantity.
The typical habitats dominance is in order to status and the effect of expression typical habitats in the ecosystem.It is the ratio that accounts for the protected location total area by the area of typical habitats that concrete amount is calculated index.Main reflection protected location is to the ecological protection degree in main habitat.
The habitat deterioration index is meant that the degeneration area that is caused owing to the soil erosion, desertification, salinization of soil, wetland degeneration, water pollution etc. accounts for the number percent of the protected location total area.
Specifically be calculated as follows:
In the formula, HD is the habitat deterioration index, w
iBe degeneration weight, S
iBe the degeneration area of slight, moderate, the different degradation level of severe, S is the protected location area.
Community Participation is meant that wilderness area and peripheral community resident thereof the number (inferior) in natural reserve construction and the protection work of participating in accounts for the ratio of protected location and peripheral community resident's total number of persons.It has reflected protected location and community's coordinated development and condominium, realizes an index of protected location resource and ecological sustainability thereof.
The social recognition rate is the index of reflection wilderness area communication and education effect; it mainly is investigation wilderness area and peripheral community resident thereof lay special stress on protecting object and character thereof to the protected location degree of understanding; generally; by the survey mode; investigate the degree of awareness of different crowd immediately, promptly have cognitive number to account for to investigation content in respondent's number by the ratio of investigation total number of persons to the wilderness area.
Average annual travel person-time, this index mainly is the economic results in society of reflection protected location, the travel person-time in the every year by the statistics protected location weighs the protected location to influence of society.
Step 106, determine evaluation criterion, on-line evaluation is carried out in the wilderness area based on standard.
The score summation that must be divided into 12 item ratings of each wilderness area multiply by its weight separately then.At last effective result is managed in the protected location and be divided into 4 grades: comprising 30 more than 30 minutes, to be divided into management outstanding, good for management between 20-30 divides, for management is general, relatively poor for management below 10 minutes between 10-20 divides.The overall assessment standard is as follows:
Manage outstanding (more than 30 minutes): promptly the score situation at aspects such as control measures, protection effect and social influences be respectively 5 minutes, more than 20 minutes and 5 minutes.12 little item ratings to reach 8 excellent more than.
Management good (20-30 branch): more than promptly the score situation at aspects such as control measures, protection effect and social influences is respectively the 4-5 branch, 15-20 divides and 4-5 divides.It is individual excellent that 12 little item ratings will reach 4-7.
Management general (in) (10-20 branch): more than promptly the score situation at aspects such as control measures, protection effect and social influences is respectively the 3-4 branch, 10-15 divides and 3-4 divides.
Manage poor (below 10 minutes): promptly the score situation at aspects such as control measures, protection effect and social influences be respectively less than 3 minutes, less than dividing and less than more than 3 minutes.
Concrete every evaluation criterion sees attached list 2.
Fig. 2 is the software architecture synoptic diagram of the wilderness area managerial effectiveness Quantitative Evaluation System that provides of the embodiment of the invention two, as shown in Figure 2.The Quantitative Evaluation System of present embodiment comprises that data input module 21, data processing module 22, evaluation index amount are calculated module 23, managerial effectiveness is estimated diversity module 24.
In concrete the enforcement, image input module 21 is used for the online input of enquiry data and remote sensing thematic data, and deposit data is in the specified memory of computing machine, so that other module is carried out subsequent treatment.
The evaluation index amount is calculated module 23, is used for data are handled data after the statistics according to each index amount method of calculationing, carries out index quantification calculating.At first utilize each index amount to calculate algorithm, calculate score separately; Then each desired value be multiply by weight separately, carry out accumulation calculating, and multiply by its rule layer weight, get its protected location managerial effectiveness score by its rule layer.
Managerial effectiveness is estimated diversity module 24, is used for realizing the wilderness area managerial effectiveness is estimated classification.Utilize and estimate grade scale, each specific targets score and PTS are carried out classification.
It should be noted that at last: above embodiment is only in order to technical scheme of the present invention to be described but not limit it, although the present invention is had been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiment, those of ordinary skill in the art is to be understood that: it still can make amendment or be equal to replacement technical scheme of the present invention, and these modifications or be equal to replacement and also can not make amended technical scheme break away from the spirit and scope of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. a wilderness area managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating is characterized in that, comprising:
Step 1, obtain data such as wilderness area environment and ecology by means such as remote sensing satellite and on-site inspections;
Step 2, the wilderness area quantitative evaluation index system of utilizing analytical hierarchy process and expert's scoring to determine are determined the index intension and are quantitatively measured the calculation method;
Step 3, utilize remotely-sensed data inverting NPP, vegetation coverage, typical habitats dominance, habitat deterioration index etc. to refer to target values;
Step 4, utilize the ground investigation data volume to calculate control measures, the relevant concrete evaluation index of social influence rule layer;
Step 5, utilize analytical hierarchy process, determine each index authority, be weighted the summation amount and calculate each wilderness area and estimate value;
Step 6, determine evaluation criterion, on-line evaluation is carried out in the wilderness area based on standard.
2. wilderness area according to claim 1 managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterized in that, in the described step 2, described definite wilderness area quantitative evaluation index system and index intension thereof and quantitative amount calculation method comprise: the professional and technical personnel's proportion in the control measures, protectiveness efficiency in the use of funds, scientific research project drop into four-indexes such as frequency, the intension of amount, illegal incidents and quantitatively measure the calculation method; The five fingers mark, intension such as the protection of goal degree of protection in the effect (population that comprises the protection of goal species of species wilderness area changes and the endangered species quantity or the species richness of ecosystem class), typical habitats dominance, habitat deterioration index, vegetation coverage, NPP and quantitatively measure the calculation method; Three indexs, intension such as the Community Participation in the social influence, social recognition rate, average annual travel person-time and quantitatively measure the calculation method.
3. wilderness area according to claim 1 managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterized in that, in the described step 3, describedly utilize finger target values such as remotely-sensed data inverting NPP, vegetation coverage, typical habitats dominance, habitat deterioration index to be meant to utilize remotely-sensed data to generate vegetation index (NDVI); And climatological datas such as the medial temperature in corresponding month, average precipitation, total solar radiation, net radiation are carried out space interpolation handle, generate and NDVI pixel raster data of the same size; Generate data such as vegetation pattern, coverage distribution, main habitat area, habitat degeneration area, NPP on this basis, and calculate by corresponding index amount calculation method.
4. wilderness area according to claim 1 managerial effectiveness method for quantitatively evaluating is characterized in that, in the described step 6, described evaluation criterion is that the overall merit score is carried out grade scale and the classification of every specific targets evaluation criterion.
5. a wilderness area managerial effectiveness Quantitative Evaluation System is characterized in that, comprising: data input module, data processing module, evaluation index amount are calculated module, managerial effectiveness is estimated diversity module;
Described image input module is used for the online input of enquiry data and remote sensing thematic data, and deposit data is in the specified memory of computing machine, so that other module is carried out subsequent treatment.
Described data processing module, be used for to the remote sensing thematic data and the enquiry data of input verify, remote sensing image processing so that the index parameters such as NPP that obtain valid data and comprise the target image in the study area.The data validity of checking input at first is then according to the remote sensing thematic data of input and investigation statistics its total NPP, average N PP, average coverage, each vegetation pattern coverage, habitat degeneration area, habitat area etc.
Described evaluation index amount is calculated module, is used for data are handled data after the statistics according to each index amount method of calculationing, carries out index quantification calculating.At first utilize each index amount to calculate algorithm, calculate score separately; Then each desired value be multiply by weight separately, carry out accumulation calculating, and multiply by its rule layer weight, get its protected location managerial effectiveness score by its rule layer.
Described managerial effectiveness is estimated diversity module, is used for realizing the wilderness area managerial effectiveness is estimated classification.Utilize and estimate grade scale, each specific targets score and PTS are carried out classification.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011100594256A CN102136103A (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2011-03-14 | Natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011100594256A CN102136103A (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2011-03-14 | Natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102136103A true CN102136103A (en) | 2011-07-27 |
Family
ID=44295880
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011100594256A Pending CN102136103A (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2011-03-14 | Natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102136103A (en) |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102436541A (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2012-05-02 | 南开大学 | Ecological reference value calculating method based on plankton community change |
| CN103208028A (en) * | 2013-04-11 | 2013-07-17 | 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所 | Waterfowl habitat suitability evaluation method based on combination of remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) |
| CN103646155A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2014-03-19 | 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所 | RGB (red, green and blue) chromatographic overlay map digitalized display method for grassland vegetation |
| CN107169874A (en) * | 2017-04-18 | 2017-09-15 | 山西农业大学 | A kind of Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation index system of mountain bridge cultivation |
| CN107832982A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-03-23 | 广东广业开元科技有限公司 | One kind fits trip's index calculation method based on big data tourism trip assessment models region |
| CN110135368A (en) * | 2019-05-20 | 2019-08-16 | 太原理工大学 | Based on spatial autocorrelation regional vegetation net primary productivity spatio-temporal variability detection method |
| CN110245833A (en) * | 2019-05-15 | 2019-09-17 | 生态环境部卫星环境应用中心 | A kind of Development in Nature Reserve construction project Ecological Evaluation method and its system |
| CN110659806A (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2020-01-07 | 北京农业生物技术研究中心 | Rosa resource evaluation method |
| CN111652487A (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2020-09-11 | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所 | Ecological influence evaluation system for road construction project in natural conservation area |
| CN112434937A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-03-02 | 国家林业和草原局华东调查规划设计院 | Natural protected area protection vacancy analysis method and system |
-
2011
- 2011-03-14 CN CN2011100594256A patent/CN102136103A/en active Pending
Cited By (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102436541A (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2012-05-02 | 南开大学 | Ecological reference value calculating method based on plankton community change |
| CN102436541B (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2018-01-12 | 南开大学 | Ecological benchmark value calculating method based on plankton community change |
| CN103208028A (en) * | 2013-04-11 | 2013-07-17 | 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所 | Waterfowl habitat suitability evaluation method based on combination of remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) |
| CN103646155A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2014-03-19 | 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所 | RGB (red, green and blue) chromatographic overlay map digitalized display method for grassland vegetation |
| CN103646155B (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2016-06-29 | 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所 | The folded figure digital display method of grassland vegetation RGB color spectrum |
| CN107169874A (en) * | 2017-04-18 | 2017-09-15 | 山西农业大学 | A kind of Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation index system of mountain bridge cultivation |
| CN107832982A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-03-23 | 广东广业开元科技有限公司 | One kind fits trip's index calculation method based on big data tourism trip assessment models region |
| CN110245833A (en) * | 2019-05-15 | 2019-09-17 | 生态环境部卫星环境应用中心 | A kind of Development in Nature Reserve construction project Ecological Evaluation method and its system |
| CN110135368A (en) * | 2019-05-20 | 2019-08-16 | 太原理工大学 | Based on spatial autocorrelation regional vegetation net primary productivity spatio-temporal variability detection method |
| CN110135368B (en) * | 2019-05-20 | 2021-01-22 | 太原理工大学 | Space autocorrelation area based vegetation net primary productivity space-time difference detection method |
| CN110659806A (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2020-01-07 | 北京农业生物技术研究中心 | Rosa resource evaluation method |
| CN111652487A (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2020-09-11 | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所 | Ecological influence evaluation system for road construction project in natural conservation area |
| CN111652487B (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2021-07-13 | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所 | Ecological influence evaluation system for road construction project in natural conservation area |
| CN112434937A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-03-02 | 国家林业和草原局华东调查规划设计院 | Natural protected area protection vacancy analysis method and system |
| CN112434937B (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2023-09-05 | 国家林业和草原局华东调查规划院 | Natural protected land protection vacancy analysis method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN102136103A (en) | Natural preservation area management effectiveness quantitative evaluation method and system | |
| Fu et al. | Corruption pays off: How environmental regulations promote corporate innovation in a developing country | |
| Soon et al. | Willingly or grudgingly? A meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for renewable energy use | |
| Ming et al. | Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment with vulnerability surface and hazard joint return period | |
| Wei et al. | Industrial SO2 pollution and agricultural losses in China: evidence from heavy air polluters | |
| Swaleheen, Mushfiq us; Stansel, Dean | Economic freedom, corruption, and growth | |
| Kim | An assessment of deforestation models for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) | |
| CN108918815B (en) | Method for predicting heavy metal risk of soil | |
| Zhao et al. | Changes in spatiotemporal drought characteristics over northeast China from 1960 to 2018 based on the modified nested Copula model | |
| Zhao et al. | Positive or negative externalities? Exploring the spatial spillover and industrial agglomeration threshold effects of environmental regulation on haze pollution in China | |
| McAfee et al. | Reconciling precipitation trends in Alaska: 1. Station‐based analyses | |
| Desalegn et al. | Developing GIS-based soil erosion map using RUSLE of Andit Tid Watershed, central highlands of Ethiopia | |
| Lallemant et al. | Nature-based solutions for flood risk reduction: A probabilistic modeling framework | |
| Wang et al. | A new application of the support vector regression on the construction of financial conditions index to CPI prediction | |
| Zhu et al. | A hybrid decomposition and Machine learning model for forecasting Chlorophyll-a and total nitrogen concentration in coastal waters | |
| Das et al. | Two decades of ensemble flood forecasting: a state-of-the-art on past developments, present applications and future opportunities | |
| Jiang et al. | Toward improved probabilistic predictions for flood forecasts generated using deterministic models | |
| CN103839176A (en) | New energy enterprise value assessment model based on analytic hierarchy process | |
| Chen et al. | Risk assessment of maize drought in China based on physical vulnerability | |
| Kasyanov et al. | Method for multi-criteria evaluation of urban parks | |
| Li et al. | Evaluation and statistical post‐processing of two precipitation reforecast products during summer in the mainland of China | |
| Osennyaya et al. | Cadastral assessment and challenging its results today in Russia | |
| Hao et al. | Integration of multinomial-logistic and Markov-chain models to derive land-use change dynamics | |
| Carnevale et al. | An integrated air quality forecast system for a metropolitan area | |
| Shu et al. | Evaluation of the impact of multi-source uncertainties on meteorological and hydrological ensemble forecasting |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20110727 |