CN100449431C - Method and device for controlling an installation for producing steel - Google Patents
Method and device for controlling an installation for producing steel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN100449431C CN100449431C CNB2004800317675A CN200480031767A CN100449431C CN 100449431 C CN100449431 C CN 100449431C CN B2004800317675 A CNB2004800317675 A CN B2004800317675A CN 200480031767 A CN200480031767 A CN 200480031767A CN 100449431 C CN100449431 C CN 100449431C
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- steel
- ratings
- production
- calculation procedure
- optimize structure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
- G05B13/021—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a variable is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
- Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for controlling an installation for producing steel having specific material properties, which depend on the structure and which can be influenced by operating parameters of the installation. Said operating parameters are determined by a computing program for structure optimization, whereby the set values of the chemical composition of the steel are simultaneously determined by the computing program for structure optimization.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of method and apparatus that is used to control the equipment of producing steel, wherein steel has the special material characteristic that depends on that structure also can be influenced by the operational factor of equipment, and these operational factors are determined by means of the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure.
Background technology
Steel must be produced according to the material behavior that the user wishes.The important materials characteristic of steel for example has: tensile strength, elastic limit and elongation at break.If steel is that then these material behaviors have crucial meaning for extend deeply (for example making body panels or beverage can).
The material behavior of steel is by the decision of its institutional framework, and institutional framework is by the producting rule influence of manufacture process with determine.
Must guarantee that the chemical composition of steel is consistent with each ratings in the mill.These ratings are corresponding to the ratio of components that can pass through the chemical laboratory analytical control.
In order to produce the steel corresponding, also require the operational factor that keeps certain with predetermined properties.These operational factors comprise for fusing, casting, heating, rolling and cool off the ratings in each stage.At this, for example change that can relate to temperature, pressure, speed or go up At All Other Times.
The ratings of specific element ratio of components or the ratings of operational factor always are made of a desired value and lower limit and higher limit, and margin tolerance is between this lower limit and higher limit.
In steelworks or rolling factory, often be difficult to determine suitable ratings for producing, make under the working condition of cheap as far as possible and rare risk, in final products, to obtain desirable material behavior.At this, must will be for example the user for the standardization steel quality of specific application area the condition of requirement employed production method in considering steelworks under satisfied.These production methods comprise for the desired value of the manufacturer's standard of steel quality and each production stage and margin tolerance.
But the measured value of product always departs from the ratings of manufacture process in practice.The deviation of the measured value in a production stage must be carried out acting in opposition to it in step subsequently, the feasible minimum value that can reach desired material behavior, for example tensile strength.If can not reach this value, then corresponding steel (molten metal, slab ingot or wire rod) just can not be suitable for preset task.In this case, must be with this part processing of this task once more since first production stage, this has caused loss and also possible delay in delivery economically.
Usually, definite to coming in the framework of mission planning technically by planning authorities for producing the ratings that is fit to.The staff utilizes the different technology form be stored in the data processing equipment with client's the Task Switching suitable production method for factory, and wherein, these production methods are associated with specific ratings.
To determine ratio of components each element, that can pass through the chemical laboratory analytical control for steel.This group ratings is also referred to as the steel feature.Similarly, also to determine ratings for the operational factor of each production stage.In steelworks, make molten metal and therefrom water and cast out slab ingot.In stove, be that the operation of rolling heats with slab ingot.In hot-rolling mill, slab ingot is rolled into wire rod, in cold-rolling mill, carries out further rolling in case of necessity or wire rod is carried out quantitative modified, and be divided into littler shape in case of necessity.
Such situation often appears: can be by realizing specific task by interchangeable ratings groups that provide in the form, a plurality of.In order to reach desirable characteristic, the staff must determine in these possible ratings groups, because the production task of assigning to production division only allows a ratings group.The staff determines a specific ratings group according to its knowhow.In these technology forms of safeguarding by quality department, the whole technical knowhows (Know-how) of company with regard to production run have been contained.New projects in these forms and change are the knowhow by for many years and change progressively that the trial production of ratings group forms.
Between the several years in the past, the various mathematical methods that are used to calculate the material behavior of steel have been developed.These methods comprise the physics-metallurgy model of manufacture process, and determine the change of the institutional framework of steel for each production stage, and calculate material behavior thus.
In this way, can simulate each production stage on computers.Verified that for common steel type the value that the material behavior that is calculated is measured in practice is coincide well.
EP 0901016A2 discloses a kind of mathematical method that is used for the characteristic of definite steel.Determine typical parameter by neuroid, as elastic limit, tensile strength, elongation at break, hardness, or the like.
WO 99/24182 discloses and a kind ofly has been used to control metallurgical technology equipment to produce the method for steel or aluminium, at this, makes the steel with the certain material characteristics that depends on structure, and wherein these material behaviors depend on and are used for the operational factor of operational outfit.The definite of operational factor will carry out according to the material behavior of desirable steel by means of the structure optimization device.This structure optimization device is a calculation procedure that utilizes neuroid to be used for optimizing structure.
But shortcoming is that the production schedule often can not produce good production routine, be good order, because will determine a ratings group to each production task.An example for this reason is the fusing plan, and it must comprehensively advance to have a plurality of production tasks of different steel characteristics and scale in the melting order of melting and technical compatibility.In melting once, only can handle a kind of task of steel feature, and the melting that in a sequence, only can have compatible steel feature successively.Often have similar task on a large amount of qualities in the task deposit, it is measured less but has different steel features.This situation often causes the production routine of difference, because possible melting quantity is very low in program, and various melting often must utilize so-called support task (Lagerauftraege) to fill up, because lack the quality that is fit to client's task.
Shortcoming is that also for the requirement of basis to material behavior and production cost comes the ratings array is optimized, quality department must spend many money and time.The production experiment that the ratings array that numerous desired utilizations are revised is carried out, and the check that utilizes the laboratory sample that material behavior is carried out has subsequently respectively caused high expense.Therefore, many ratings arrays are the compromise of the security that must derive from inadequate production experiment number with regard to the desired value and margin tolerance pursued.For certain material characteristics, more high tolerance scope and cheaper desired value, can only after production for many years, just can realize a kind of steel type.
The regulating system of each productive unit attempts to keep the ratings of its output quantity basically, even input value, be the measured value generation deviation of preceding step.Too cold when if slab ingot comes out to arrive on the roll line from stove, then the regulating system of roll line just attempts to reach its ratings for rolling band output temperature by suitably changing the adjusting parameter of regulating system.This only just works for the ratings that can also influence, and for example can change to a certain degree wrong temperature and size.But, can not in follow-up milling train, also change chemico-analytic steel with mistake, promptly have the steel of wrong alloying element ratio of components.
If for example, then will cancel current intermediate product for this task because each element has exceeded boundary value and can't stand deviation in chemical analysis.Must be by the production schedule with higher priority weight new production material, but this will cause time delay.Current intermediate materials, otherwise be switched to other suitable task, promptly use it for anything else in addition, become the support task that has nothing to do with the client at a puss; From produce, rejected and deposited temporarily.A kind of possibility in back is, is that waste product also drops into resources circulation once more with material marking.
Summary of the invention
Therefore, the technical problem to be solved in the present invention is, a kind of method that is used to control the equipment of producing steel is provided, and this method is planning tasks and can be more neatly for reacting with the deviation of ratings more neatly.
In order to solve the problems of the technologies described above, the present invention's suggestion begins to determine the ratings of the chemical composition of steel simultaneously by means of the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure in the method for the type that part mentions at this paper.
Different with known method, not only determine to have the operational factor of influence, and also determine the ratings of the chemical composition of steel simultaneously for material behavior by means of the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure.Notion " simultaneously " has also comprised such method, wherein for example determines the ratings of chemical composition in first computation process, determines operational factor subsequently in second computation process, otherwise perhaps.Each computation process can in turn be carried out, and wherein always considers the ratings and the operational factor of chemical composition.Therefore provide multiple degree of freedom for technical scheme,, but can utilize a plurality of ratings groups because each task not only can be utilized a pre-determined ratings array.The operator on the productive unit up to now, can not proofread and correct, because can not determine or be given in advance for the necessary influence of production stage subsequently to the ratings array.But, then can under the condition of considering needed material behavior, from production result up to now, calculate online for the necessary ratings adjustment of production stage subsequently by means of the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure.
The present invention is based on following cognition: when determining ratings, not only will consider single production stage, but also will consider whole possible solution space, so that realize desired material behavior for the ratings change.Employed up to now much more degree of freedom of ratio and the corresponding possibility of separating have been had relatively and have comprised in the solution space of the ratings of relying on mutually by production stage at this.
Be used for simultaneously determining the chemical composition of steel and the ratings of operational factor by the calculation procedure that will be used for optimizing structure, can construct the production schedule more neatly.In addition, can during each production stage, carry out the line Quality Control that runs through.In utilizing the production schedule of this improvement all possible change of ratings can be introduced to calculate, thereby can from existing task deposit, set up the production routine that improves, that is, and longer melting sequence and still less filling task in melting.
By according to method of the present invention, at production period the deviation of each measured value and ratings has been carried out balance by the calculating that necessity of ratings is subsequently changed, make that flagrant up to now deviation also can be tolerated.Therefore, method of the present invention makes the margin tolerance of ratio of components of the element can enlarge in steel to be comprised.
Suitable is, with the ratings of chemical composition and the operational factor that calculates with its coupling in case of necessity, be used for specific steel purposes respectively comprehensively at a data set.As the result of computation optimization, select as follows and export a data set for specific steel purposes by calculation procedure: in the production schedule for the data set combination of every kind of steel application choice the best treating plan target.
The measured value of the chemical composition of steel and the measured value and the ratings of operational factor can be compared in the method for the invention, and when deviation occurring, re-execute the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure.This result calculated can be, selects another and is more suitable for ratings group in measured value.Improved the number of possible combination thus significantly, and occurring between measured value and the ratings under the situation of deviation, can following product made from steel still be used for the purpose of being planned according to higher possibility: utilize the ratings group of a modification to carry out the subsequent production step.
Preferred embodiment a kind of according to the inventive method, be that ratings distributes the margin tolerance between the lower limit and the upper limit, and when the margin tolerance of the ratings that exceeds the chemical composition that is used for determining steel and/or operational factor, re-execute the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure.
The calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure can be optimized at one or more parameters optimization.Suitable is that the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure is that purpose is moved with the material outlay and/or the production expense of minimum.For example, by under the temperature that changes, carrying out specific treatment step, can save specific expensive alloy element.
What especially have superiority in the method for the invention is, during production stage and/or afterwards, and by means of the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure, carry out quality control by ratings and measured value are compared.Thus, can abandon relatively slowly and the test of expensive experimental chamber, the cogency of these tests only is limited in many cases.Check all product made from steel at its material behavior and to the maintenance of ratings continuously by the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure, as molten metal, slab ingot or wire rod, thereby the control that the real material inspection of for example pulling force inspection can be reduced to is once in a while tested.
The present invention's suggestion is being carried out quality control during the production run on different points in hot-rolling mill.Particularly suitablely for this reason be, in the slab ingot warehouse, on the output terminal of heating furnace, on the output terminal of mmi machine frame and the terminal supply reel of production line, carry out enclosing bundle according to the slab ingot of production task.On each reference mark, the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure is from the known solid measured value of up to now product and have corresponding falling into a trap with aftertreatment of ratings and calculate the material behavior of expection.If utilize current ratings can not realize desired material behavior in production stage subsequently, then the structure optimization device attempts carrying out automatically the ratings adjustment.If calculate positive result, then quality control just discharges the adjustment of ratings.If calculate less than the result, then quality control is just sought the ratings group that cost is low and suitable by means of the calculation procedure that is used for optimizing structure in the ratings inventory of task deposit, and intermediate materials is transformed on this task.Thus, also determined new ratings for generation step subsequently.
The production schedule of method of the present invention and steel production equipment can be coupled.The production schedule and quality control are the modules of production control system (production executive system).Therewith accordingly, can also be directly the production control system of method of the present invention and steel manufacturing apparatus be coupled.
The invention still further relates to a kind of above-mentioned device that is used to control the method for the equipment of producing steel that is used to implement.At this, be used for the calculation procedure of structure optimization according to the present invention and be configured to, determine the ratings of the chemical composition of steel simultaneously.
Description of drawings
Other advantage of the present invention and details are provided by following description related to the preferred embodiment by means of accompanying drawing.Among the figure:
Fig. 1 illustrates the synoptic diagram of the mode of action of structure optimization device;
Fig. 2 illustrates the change along with the mechanical property of the steel of temperature and constituent content;
Fig. 3 illustrates the interaction of structure optimization device and production control system;
Fig. 4 illustrates the process flow diagram that has various method steps;
Fig. 5 is illustrated in the quality control that production period carries out; And
Fig. 6 illustrates determining for the best ratings of whole production approach.
Embodiment
Fig. 1 illustrates the synoptic diagram of the structure optimization device mode of action in the optimization of alloy cost.Be denoted as calculation procedure structure optimization device 1, that be used for optimizing structure below, the ratings 3 of the ratings 2 of acquisition chemical composition and the operational factor of specified process.Ratings 2,3 provides so-called steel feature jointly, and is that the steel feature is based on experience and comprised for needed all information of the production of each task.The material behavior of the steel of being produced can be by equipment the operational factor influence, operational factor comprises treatment temperature and pressure, can also be their time-derivative in case of necessity.Realized mathematical model in structure optimization device 1, its simulation material characteristic is also determined the change of the institutional framework of steel for each production stage.Structure optimization device 1 can also utilize the method work of neuroid.As a result of, structure optimization device 1 provides the ratings 4 for the modification of the chemical composition of steel after having carried out computation optimization, and the latter compares with ratings 2 and allows the cheaper production of cost.For example, can pursue under the condition that the material behavior deterioration do not occur, reduce relatively costly alloy material, as niobium, manganese or titanium.Be associated with amended ratings for the amended ratings 5 of production run for chemical composition.Ratings 4, the 5 common ratings groups that constitute as the basis that produces.
Fig. 2 shows the change of the mechanical property of steel along with temperature and constituent content.
Fig. 3 shows the interaction of structure optimization device 1 and production control system.The production control system 9 that is also referred to as production executive system (MES) comprises the production schedule and quality control or the like.The structure monitor is such computing module, and its data according to input are calculated the material behavior as intensity or elastic limit.Thus, can substitute time-consuming laboratory inspection as much as possible.If after the calculating of having carried out the structure monitor, determine to keep mechanical property, then analyze: whether can handle relevant product made from steel like this, make it be in the margin tolerance by changing ratings by means of structure optimization device 1.As the measured value 10 of the input quantity of structure monitor or structure optimization device 1, comprise ratio of components, treatment temperature of each chemical element or the like.As operational factor and the procedure parameter of ratings 11 outputs as subsequent production step basis.
Can realize the reduction of cost by the structure optimization device 1 and the coupling of production control system 9 aspects because for production application the steel feature after optimizing.When being tested, the quality of wire rod can save time, because the structure monitor has farthest substituted laboratory inspection.Like this, for each wire rod calculates material behavior, make probability of errors reduce.Additional advantage is, a plurality of degree of freedom are provided in the production schedule.Up to now, there is the unique standardized steel feature that has for the subscription rate definite value of hot rolling and cooling for every task.In contrast, a plurality of predetermined values that can satisfy desired material behavior are respectively provided for each task in the method for the invention.Each predetermined value by give the tapping feature, comprise for the manufacturer's standard of the ratings of hot rolling and cooling and forming.From these predetermined values, can calculate and select one that forms lowest production cost by structure optimization device 1.
Mission planning provides the inventory of the optional manufacturer's standard that is used to realize material behavior for the melting plan of each task, and also has ratings coupling therewith, that calculate by means of the structure optimization device.Thus, the plan for melting has provided much more degree of freedom.Can set up the big sequence that reduces steel Feature Conversion number.Equally, can reduce filling task in the molten melting.Can be following the utilization steel feature that reduces number produce: pass through the rolling and regular balance of cooling calculated characteristic at task.Mission planning provides a plurality of tasks with same steel feature for the melting plan, so that realize the production routine of improvement.The structure optimization device calculates suitable ratings for the material behavior at task.
Fig. 4 is that example shows the process flow diagram that has various method steps with the hot-rolling mill.
Before beginning production, cost is optimized at chemical analysis off-line ground.The result of this optimization can use in method step 12, so that the main line data of production control system are made amendment.The wide in range selection that mission planning 13 can be provided for planning for each task of melting plan to the steel feature.Melting is planned at material behavior cost to be optimized in the production schedule.Carry out line Quality Control 15, wherein in task, prick or save, or enclose the bundle slab ingot online for enclosing of slab ingot.In stove the heating or the mmi machine frame in rolling after, carry out another line Quality Control 16.After supply reel, carry out to discharge wire rod at once after another quality control 17, finish this method thus.
Fig. 5 shows the quality control of carrying out at production period.
Current process data arrives production control system (MES) 9 from stove or forebay 18.In step 19, test, see and whether can realize desired material behavior.If conclusion is a "Yes", then utilize current ratings to continue to produce.If conclusion is a "No", then must in step 20, adjust by the ratings to task.For this reason, production control system 9 and structure monitor and 1 acting in conjunction of structure optimization device, and obtain amended ratings.On the basis of amended ratings, can check be seen and utilized amended ratings realize intensity in step 21.If can realize intensity, then utilize amended ratings to produce.If can not realize intensity, then the bundle requirement is enclosed in output, so that slab ingot is combined with another task.Reduce to enclose the number of bundle, can also save slab ingot for present task in many cases by modification for ratings.The slab ingot or the wire rod that no longer are fit to for present task are enclosed bundle at once, no longer carry out other production stage.
Fig. 6 shows determining for the best ratings of whole production approach with illustrated form.
Determined best ratings by method of the present invention for the whole production approach, wherein, to production procedure each the operation and treatment step carry out computer modeling and simulation.The basis of computation optimization is a chemical analysis 22, consequently casts 23 input quantity for pipeline.Follow by hot rolling 24 and cold rolling 25.In order to improve structure, after cold rolling, following annealing process 26.Each all treatment steps flows into the mathematical model of structure optimization device 1, makes this mathematical model can determine best ratings under the condition of considering the whole production flow process.Structure optimization device 1 also is coupled with production control system (MES) 9, can control production according to the result of structure optimization device 1 accordingly therewith.In a word, can save energy and material cost significantly by this method.In addition, set up expertise by whole process.
Claims (15)
1. method that is used to control the equipment of producing steel, wherein steel has the certain material characteristics that depends on that structure also can be influenced by the operational factor of equipment, these operational factors are determined by the calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure, it is characterized in that, determine the ratings of the chemical composition of steel by this calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure simultaneously.
2. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, with described chemical composition ratings and in case of necessity with the operational factor of its coupling purposes that calculate, that be used for particular steel respectively comprehensively at data set.
3. method according to claim 2 is characterized in that, by the described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure, the data set for every kind of steel application choice the best treating plan target in the production schedule makes up.
4. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the measured value of the chemical composition of steel and the measured value and the ratings of operational factor is compared, and re-execute the described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure when deviation occurring.
5. method according to claim 4, it is characterized in that, be that ratings distributes the margin tolerance between the lower limit and the upper limit, and when the margin tolerance of the ratings that exceeds the chemical composition that is used for determining steel and/or operational factor, re-execute the described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure.
6. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure is that purpose is determined described ratings with alap material outlay and/or production expense.
7. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, during production stage and/or afterwards, and by the described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure, carry out quality control by described ratings and measured value are compared.
8. method according to claim 7, it is characterized in that, in the slab ingot warehouse and/or on the output terminal of the supply reel of the output of the output terminal of heating furnace and/or mmi machine frame and/or production line end, carry out enclosing quality control in the bundle, hot-rolling mill at slab ingot according to production task.
9. according to 1 described method in the claim, it is characterized in that whether the described calculation procedure check that is used to optimize structure can realize desired material behavior with current ratings in production stage subsequently.
10. method according to claim 9 is characterized in that, if can not realize desired material behavior with current ratings in production stage subsequently, the then described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure is adjusted ratings.
11. according to each described method in the claim 1 to 10, it is characterized in that, the production schedule of this method and steel production equipment be coupled.
12. according to each described method in the claim 1 to 10, it is characterized in that, the production control system of this method and steel production equipment be coupled.
13., it is characterized in that according to each described method in the claim 1 to 10, pass through the change of the operational factor calculated, when the steel feature of determining for task, reduce the number of the steel feature of factory.
14. according to each described method in the claim 1 to 10, it is characterized in that,, increase margin tolerance for the chemical element of steel feature by the change of operational factor.
15. one kind is used for implementing according to each described device that is used to control the method for the equipment of producing steel of claim 1 to 10, wherein steel has the certain material characteristics that depends on that structure also can be influenced by the operational factor of equipment, these operational factors are determined by the calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure, it is characterized in that the described calculation procedure that is used to optimize structure is configured for the ratings of the chemical composition of determining steel.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE10339766A DE10339766A1 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2003-08-27 | Method and device for controlling a plant for the production of steel |
| DE10339766.3 | 2003-08-27 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN1875329A CN1875329A (en) | 2006-12-06 |
| CN100449431C true CN100449431C (en) | 2009-01-07 |
Family
ID=34258270
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2004800317675A Expired - Fee Related CN100449431C (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2004-07-26 | Method and device for controlling an installation for producing steel |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US8150544B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1658533B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2007504355A (en) |
| CN (1) | CN100449431C (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE395644T1 (en) |
| DE (2) | DE10339766A1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2307023T3 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2005021811A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4833531B2 (en) * | 2003-11-11 | 2011-12-07 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Press molding processing apparatus, press molding processing method, computer program, and recording medium |
| DE102005021337A1 (en) * | 2005-05-04 | 2006-11-16 | Abb Patent Gmbh | System and method for corrective planning and optimization of processing |
| DE102007025447A1 (en) * | 2006-10-09 | 2008-04-17 | Siemens Ag | Method for controlling and / or regulating an industrial process |
| US8868221B1 (en) * | 2008-08-22 | 2014-10-21 | Marvell International Ltd. | Adaptive neural net feed forward system and method for adaptive control of mechanical systems |
| CN102277477A (en) * | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-14 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | Establishment method for prediction model of tensile strength of cold rolled strip |
| CN101972780B (en) * | 2010-11-11 | 2013-06-26 | 攀钢集团钢铁钒钛股份有限公司 | Hot rolling titanium casting blank temperature control method |
| JP5795924B2 (en) * | 2011-09-26 | 2015-10-14 | 東芝三菱電機産業システム株式会社 | Optimization device, optimization method, and optimization program |
| DE102014224461A1 (en) | 2014-01-22 | 2015-07-23 | Sms Siemag Ag | Process for the optimized production of metallic steel and iron alloys in hot rolling and heavy plate mills by means of a microstructure simulator, monitor and / or model |
| DE102016100811A1 (en) | 2015-09-25 | 2017-03-30 | Sms Group Gmbh | Method and determination of the structural components in an annealing line |
| DE102018202651B3 (en) | 2018-02-21 | 2019-05-29 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Method for controlling a continuous casting plant |
| CA3122450C (en) | 2018-12-18 | 2024-01-02 | Arcelormittal | Method and electronic device for controlling a manufacturing of a group of final metal product(s) from a group of intermediate metal product(s), related computer program, manufacturing method and installation |
| DE102020201215A1 (en) | 2019-05-03 | 2020-11-05 | Sms Group Gmbh | Method for operating an industrial plant |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA229945A (en) * | 1923-03-27 | P. Halladay Lewis | Bumper bar | |
| DE19637917A1 (en) * | 1996-09-17 | 1998-03-19 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for designing or controlling the process flow of a plant in the raw materials industry |
| US5778151A (en) * | 1993-05-17 | 1998-07-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and control device for controlling a material-processing process |
| EP0901016A2 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 1999-03-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for determining steel properties |
| DE19850492A1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 1999-05-12 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for hot rolling thin steel strips |
| DE19806267A1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 1999-05-20 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for controlling a metallurgical plant |
Family Cites Families (37)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE637694A (en) * | 1962-09-21 | |||
| US3478808A (en) * | 1964-10-08 | 1969-11-18 | Bunker Ramo | Method of continuously casting steel |
| US3358743A (en) * | 1964-10-08 | 1967-12-19 | Bunker Ramo | Continuous casting system |
| US3683471A (en) * | 1969-03-27 | 1972-08-15 | Jerome H Lemelson | Continuous manufacturing processes and apparatus |
| US3574279A (en) * | 1970-01-08 | 1971-04-13 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Predictive gauge control method and apparatus with automatic plasticity determination for metal rolling mills |
| US4368509A (en) * | 1979-08-24 | 1983-01-11 | Li Chou H | Self-optimizing machine and method |
| US4699202A (en) * | 1986-10-02 | 1987-10-13 | Bethlehem Steel Corporation | System and method for controlling secondary spray cooling in continuous casting |
| DE3870970D1 (en) * | 1987-04-13 | 1992-06-17 | Thyssen Stahl Ag | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A STEEL STRIP. |
| JPH07116549B2 (en) | 1987-09-18 | 1995-12-13 | 日新製鋼株式会社 | Stainless steel manufacturing method |
| US4955216A (en) * | 1988-01-29 | 1990-09-11 | Southwire Company | Method and apparatus for automatically adjusting soluble oil flow rates to control metallurgical properties of continuously rolled rod |
| US5379237A (en) * | 1990-05-31 | 1995-01-03 | Integrated Diagnostic Measurement Corporation | Automated system for controlling the quality of regularly-shaped products during their manufacture |
| US5136497A (en) * | 1990-07-12 | 1992-08-04 | Bdm International, Inc. | Material consolidation modeling and control system |
| DE4105321A1 (en) * | 1991-02-20 | 1992-08-27 | Siemens Ag | CONTROL OF A HOT AND / OR COLD ROLLING PROCESS |
| US5357443A (en) * | 1991-06-04 | 1994-10-18 | Nippon Steel Corporation | Method of estimating properties of steel product |
| ATE129938T1 (en) * | 1991-06-28 | 1995-11-15 | Siemens Ag | REGULATIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HOT STRIP USING A MULTI-STAND HOT STRIP ROLLING MILL. |
| US5205345A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1993-04-27 | Acutus Industries | Method and apparatus for slab width control |
| DE69215613T2 (en) * | 1991-09-10 | 1997-05-15 | Nippon Steel Corp | Process for controlling the heating of an alloy furnace for the production of hot-dip metallized and alloy steel strip |
| JP3234949B2 (en) * | 1992-12-14 | 2001-12-04 | ハネウエル・インコーポレーテッド | Flexible way to create recipes in process control systems |
| US6044895A (en) * | 1993-12-21 | 2000-04-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Continuous casting and rolling system including control system |
| DE19508474A1 (en) * | 1995-03-09 | 1996-09-19 | Siemens Ag | Intelligent computer control system |
| CA2192834C (en) * | 1995-04-14 | 2001-02-13 | Shinichi Teraoka | Apparatus for producing strip of stainless steel |
| US5854749A (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1998-12-29 | Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. | Custom quality control monitoring of a steel making process |
| US6438534B1 (en) * | 1996-06-21 | 2002-08-20 | Siemens Aktiengesellscaft | Process and system for commissioning industrial plants, in particular in the primary industry |
| DE19644132B4 (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 2005-07-07 | Siemens Ag | Method for optimizing the bandwidth distribution at the ends of a strip passing through a rolling train |
| AT408623B (en) * | 1996-10-30 | 2002-01-25 | Voest Alpine Ind Anlagen | METHOD FOR MONITORING AND CONTROLLING THE QUALITY OF ROLLING PRODUCTS FROM HOT ROLLING PROCESSES |
| US6144954A (en) * | 1998-01-27 | 2000-11-07 | Li; Chou H. | Automatic development of computer software |
| FR2781786B1 (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2000-10-13 | Stein Heurtey | DEVICE FOR CONDUCTING GLASS MELTING AND / OR REFINING OVENS |
| BR9803848A (en) * | 1998-10-08 | 2000-10-31 | Opp Petroquimica S A | Inline system for inference of physical and chemical properties, inline system for inference of process variables, and inline control system |
| US6625500B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2003-09-23 | Chou H. Li | Self-optimizing method and machine |
| DE19930173A1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2001-01-04 | Parsytec Comp Gmbh | Method and device for the process-optimized setting of parameters of a production process |
| DE10036971A1 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2002-02-28 | Siemens Ag | Method for remote diagnosis of a technological process |
| US6581672B2 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2003-06-24 | Nucor Corporation | Method for controlling a continuous strip steel casting process based on customer-specified requirements |
| RU2207204C1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-06-27 | ООО "Сорби стил" | Method for optimizing process for making rolled product |
| JP3809614B2 (en) * | 2003-02-14 | 2006-08-16 | 関西ティー・エル・オー株式会社 | A control system with a function to evaluate and analyze the stability of a controlled object by providing a virtual power monitor |
| US20050004684A1 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2005-01-06 | General Electric Company | System and method for adjusting a control model |
| US7463940B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2008-12-09 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Multiple model development using subflowsheet functionality |
| US7546170B2 (en) * | 2007-01-02 | 2009-06-09 | Neuroblast, Inc. | Easily tuned and robust control algorithm for single or multiple variable systems |
-
2003
- 2003-08-27 DE DE10339766A patent/DE10339766A1/en not_active Ceased
-
2004
- 2004-07-26 WO PCT/EP2004/008347 patent/WO2005021811A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-07-26 JP JP2006524245A patent/JP2007504355A/en active Pending
- 2004-07-26 US US10/569,297 patent/US8150544B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-07-26 EP EP04741271A patent/EP1658533B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2004-07-26 DE DE502004007164T patent/DE502004007164D1/en active Active
- 2004-07-26 CN CNB2004800317675A patent/CN100449431C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-07-26 ES ES04741271T patent/ES2307023T3/en active Active
- 2004-07-26 AT AT04741271T patent/ATE395644T1/en active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA229945A (en) * | 1923-03-27 | P. Halladay Lewis | Bumper bar | |
| US5778151A (en) * | 1993-05-17 | 1998-07-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and control device for controlling a material-processing process |
| DE19637917A1 (en) * | 1996-09-17 | 1998-03-19 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for designing or controlling the process flow of a plant in the raw materials industry |
| EP0901016A2 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 1999-03-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for determining steel properties |
| DE19850492A1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 1999-05-12 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for hot rolling thin steel strips |
| DE19806267A1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 1999-05-20 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for controlling a metallurgical plant |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN1875329A (en) | 2006-12-06 |
| ES2307023T3 (en) | 2008-11-16 |
| JP2007504355A (en) | 2007-03-01 |
| DE502004007164D1 (en) | 2008-06-26 |
| WO2005021811A2 (en) | 2005-03-10 |
| WO2005021811A3 (en) | 2005-04-28 |
| US20070088524A1 (en) | 2007-04-19 |
| EP1658533A2 (en) | 2006-05-24 |
| EP1658533B1 (en) | 2008-05-14 |
| ATE395644T1 (en) | 2008-05-15 |
| US8150544B2 (en) | 2012-04-03 |
| DE10339766A1 (en) | 2005-04-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN100449431C (en) | Method and device for controlling an installation for producing steel | |
| WO2017088674A1 (en) | Steelmaking batch grouping and production scheduling method for whole process production | |
| CN100362332C (en) | Method for online test of steel plate mechanic property during rolling process | |
| US6546310B1 (en) | Process and device for controlling a metallurgical plant | |
| CN106779220A (en) | A kind of steel-making continuous casting hot rolling integrated scheduling method and system | |
| CN101391268B (en) | Reverse optimization method of steel plate rolling and cooling controlling-process temperature institution | |
| CN106862283B (en) | The ultrafast cold Process Control System of hot rolling | |
| CN105631759B (en) | The Multiobjective Scheduling planning device of steel mill consideration hot metal supply condition | |
| CN117025896B (en) | Heat treatment system | |
| CN101339634A (en) | Steel-smelting continuous casting production scheduling method for taking molten steel residency time limit into account | |
| JP2007188306A (en) | Scheduling apparatus considering the probability distribution of processing time | |
| CN109240203B (en) | Multi-model-based continuous casting billet constant weight control method | |
| US20080135203A1 (en) | Continuous Casting and Rolling Installation For Producing a Steel Strip | |
| CN104411421B (en) | The manufacture method of heating furnace sequence of extraction generating apparatus, heating furnace sequence of extraction generation method and steel plate | |
| JP2020157327A (en) | Control method for outlet side temperature of finished steel sheet, control device therefor and production method for steel sheet | |
| CN110520805A (en) | The modeling optimization of process model | |
| US6029097A (en) | Process and system for time control of a basic industry plant | |
| CN104942251B (en) | Cast-on time determining method of steel mill continuous casting machines | |
| JP7020379B2 (en) | Material control support device for metal materials | |
| Biondi et al. | Production optimization and scheduling in a steel plant: Hot rolling mill | |
| Reeve et al. | Control, automation and the hot rolling of steel | |
| JP2021030264A (en) | Learning model generation method, database construction method, mill setup setting method, manufacturing method of rolled material, manufacturing method of processing object, and learning model generation device | |
| Chertov | Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems in the Metallurgical Industry (Survey). | |
| US20230205185A1 (en) | System and method for controlling a production plant consisting of a plurality of plant parts, in particular a production plant for producing industrial goods such as metallic semi-finished products | |
| JP2005228128A (en) | Production scheduling method, device and computer program |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| C41 | Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model | ||
| TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20160926 Address after: Erlangen Patentee after: Puruite metallurgical technology limited liability company in Germany Address before: Munich, Germany Patentee before: Siemens AG |
|
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20090107 |