CA2865890A1 - Systems and methods for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery - Google Patents

Systems and methods for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2865890A1
CA2865890A1 CA2865890A CA2865890A CA2865890A1 CA 2865890 A1 CA2865890 A1 CA 2865890A1 CA 2865890 A CA2865890 A CA 2865890A CA 2865890 A CA2865890 A CA 2865890A CA 2865890 A1 CA2865890 A1 CA 2865890A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
recognition
employee
data
graph
details
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA2865890A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Eric MOSLEY
Grant BECKETT
Julie SARGENT
Jonathan HYLAND
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Globoforce Ltd
Original Assignee
Globoforce Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Globoforce Ltd filed Critical Globoforce Ltd
Publication of CA2865890A1 publication Critical patent/CA2865890A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06398Performance of employee with respect to a job function

Abstract

Embodiments of the invention provide tools for creating recognition moments in real-time and generating recognition network graphs that represent the recognition connections throughout organizations. Recognition network graphs are utilized to transmit recognition announcements throughout the organization, which, in turn, promotes a positive organizational climate and the values of the organization and aides managers in determining employees who are critical to the prior and future success of their business initiatives even when those employees are not within their traditional organizational hierarchies or span of control. The recognition network graph highlights connections between employees that are not self-evident within traditional organization charts. The recognition network graph may depict how business objectives are achieved via both formal and informal employee connections. Embodiments further provide managers and others with dynamic user interfaces containing recognition network graphs, reports and other analytics that facilitate the assessment of employee performance, influence, impact and other employee metrics.

Claims (48)

1. A system for promoting employee recognition at an organization, the system comprising:
a recognition data collection module for:
receiving organizational data of the organization, the organizational data including at least organizational relationship data of a plurality of employees;
receiving recognition details associated with one or more recognition moments;

storing in memory the recognition details and the organizational data; and a recognition graph module for generating, using at least one processor, a recognition network graph based on at least the recognition details and the organizational data containing the organizational relationship data, wherein the generated recognition network graph contains a plurality of nodes representing the plurality of employees.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition graph module aggregates at least the recognition details and the organizational data to generate the recognition network graph.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition graph module associates a first node and a second node with at least one recognition moment and at least a portion of the organizational data, the second node connected to the first node by a graphical link.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the graphical link represents at least one of recognition moments received by a first employee from a second employee and recognition moments received by the second employee from the first employee.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the graphical link corresponds to the stored recognition details.
6. The system of claim 3, wherein the recognition data collection module determines an employee connection score based on the recognition details and organizational data.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the shape, size or color of the first node is based on at least the determined employee connection score.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein the shape, thickness or color of the graphical link is based on at least on the determined employee connection score.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition network graph contains a focus node representing a first employee, the focus node being located at a general center location of the recognition network graph and connected to a plurality of connected nodes by a plurality of graphical links in accordance with at least the recognition details and the organizational data.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein, in response to a selection of a second employee, the recognition graph module generates a second recognition network graph containing a second focus node located at a general center location of the second recognition network graph, the second focus node representing the second employee.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition graph module generates a performance graph, the performance graph depicting employee performance of at least some of the plurality of employees.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the performance graph is generated based on at least one of: a determined employee connection score, the number of recognition moments for each employee, and an economic value of recognition moments.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition graph module generates an influence graph, the influence graph depicting the relative organizational influence of at least some of the plurality of employees of the organization.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the influence graph is generated based on at least one of the following recognition details:
number of recognition moments;
source of the recognition moments;
employee connection score; and employee performance rating.
15. The system of claim 13, wherein the influence graph contains a first node representing a first employee on a first team, and the position of a first node within the influence graph is based on recognition details including:
an internal employee connection score calculated using the recognition moments associated with the first employee and employees part of the first team; and an external employee connection score calculated based on recognition moments associated with the first employee and employees not part of the first team.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition graph module generates a performance alignment graph, the performance alignment graph depicting the alignment of the recognition moments against performance ratings associated with performance reviews for at least some of the plurality of employees.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the performance alignment graph contains a first node representing a first employee, and the position of the first node within the performance alignment graph is based on at least a recognition connection score and a performance review rating of the first employee.
18. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition details comprise one or more of a creator, a recipient, an award, an award reason, a role relationship, a performance indicator, a scope of accomplishment, a recognition category, a message; recognition reason data;
recognition nominator data; recognition nominee data; recognition profile and activities data; sphere of influence data; validation data; composition of recognition message data;
approval data; and recognition distribution data.
19. The system of claim 1, wherein the recognition graph module is further configured to automatically regenerate the recognition network graph in response to the data collection module receiving new recognition details associated with new recognition moments, the recognition graph module regenerating the recognition network graph based on the new recognition details.
20. The system of claim 1, further comprising a recognition delivery module configured to automatically transmit the recognition details to one or more computing devices upon the receiving of the recognition details by the recognition data collection module, wherein the transmitting causes at least some of the recognition details to be automatically displayed at the one or more computing devices.
21. The system of claim 1, further comprising a talent analysis module configured to:

automatically process, using the at least one processor, the recognition details and the organizational data to generate recognition analytics results;
determine employees part of a manager's team; and generate a talent analysis user interface containing the generated recognition analytics results associated with the employees part of the manager's team.
22. The system of claim 21, wherein the generated recognition analytics results describing at least one of:
likelihood of an employee leaving the company;
work engagement;
employee connections;
performance potential;
scope of influence;
employee engagement;
employee connection score;
succession candidacy;
readiness for promotion;
most inspirational employees;
top performers;
top culture promoter; and top influencers.
23. The system of claim 1, wherein the organizational data comprises at least one of:
team and division data;

tenure data;
diversity data;
performance rating data;
employee history data;
grade and grade history data; and functional group data.
24. A computer-implemented method for promoting employee recognition at an organization, the method comprising:
performing the following operations at one or more computers comprising a memory and a processor:
receiving organizational data of the organization, the organizational data including at least organizational relationship data of a plurality of employees;
receiving recognition details associated with one or more recognition moments;
storing in memory the recognition details and the organizational data; and generating a recognition network graph based on at least the recognition details and the organizational data containing the organizational relationship data, wherein the generated recognition network graph contains a plurality of nodes representing the plurality of employees.
25. The method of claim 24, further comprising the step of aggregating at least the recognition details and the organizational data, wherein the recognition network graph is generated based on said aggregating.
26. The method of claim 24, further comprising the step of associating a first node and a second node with at least one recognition moment and at least a portion of the organizational data, the second node connected to the first node by a graphical link.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the graphical link represents at least one of recognition moments received by a first employee from a second employee and recognition moments received by the second employee from the first employee.
28. The method of claim 26, wherein the graphical link corresponds to the stored recognition details.
29. The method of claim 26, further comprising the step of determining an employee connection score based on the recognition details and organizational data.
30. The method of claim 29, wherein the shape, size or color of the first node is based on at least the determined employee connection score.
31. The method of claim 29, wherein the shape, thickness or color of the graphical link is based on at least the determined employee connection score.
32. The method of claim 24, wherein the recognition network graph contains a focus node representing a first employee, the focus node being located at a general center location of the recognition network graph and connected to a plurality of connected nodes by a plurality of graphical links in accordance with at least the recognition details and the organizational data.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein in response to the selection of a second employee, the recognition graph module generates a second recognition network graph containing a second focus node located at a general center location of the second recognition network graph, the second focus node representing the second employee.
34. The method of claim 24, further comprising the step of generating at least one of the following:
a performance graph depicting employee performance of at least some of the plurality of employees;
an influence graph depicting the relative organizational influence of at least some of the plurality of employees; and a performance alignment graph depicting the alignment of the recognition moments against performance ratings associated with performance reviews for at least some of the plurality of employees.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein the performance graph is generated based at least one of: a determined employee connection score, the number of recognition moments for each employee, and an economic value of recognition moments.
36. The method of claim 34, wherein the influence graph is generated based on at least one of the following recognition details:
number of recognition moments;
source of the recognition moments;
employee connection score; and employee performance rating.
37. The method of claim 34, wherein the influence graph contains a first node representing a first employee on a first team, and the position of a first node within the influence graph is based on recognition details including:
an internal employee connection score calculated using the recognition moments associated with the first employee and employees part of the first team; and an external employee connection score calculated based on recognition moments associated with the first employee and employees not part of the first team.
38. The method of claim 34, wherein the performance alignment graph contains a first node representing a first employee, and the position of a first node within the performance alignment graph is based on at least a recognition connection score and a performance review rating of the first employee.
39. The method of claim 24, wherein the recognition details comprise one or more of a creator, a recipient, an award, an award reason, a role relationship, a performance indicator, a scope of accomplishment, a recognition category, a message; recognition reason data;
recognition nominator data; recognition nominee data; recognition profile and activities data;
sphere of influence data; validation data; composition of recognition message data; approval data; and recognition distribution data.
40. The method of claim 24, wherein the recognition graph module is further configured to automatically regenerate the recognition network graph in response to receiving new recognition details associated with new recognition moments, the recognition graph module regenerating the recognition network graph based on the new recognition details.
41. The method of claim 24, further comprising the step of automatically transmitting the recognition details to one or more computing devices upon the receiving of the recognition details, wherein the transmitting causes at least some of the recognition details to be automatically displayed at the one or more computing devices.
42. The method of claim 24, further comprising the steps of:
automatically processing the recognition details and the organizational data to generate recognition analytics results;
determining employees part of a manager's team; and generating a talent analysis user interface containing the generated recognition analytics results associated with the employees part of the manager's team.
43. The method of claim 24, wherein the organizational data comprises at least one of:
team and division data;
tenure data;
diversity data;
performance rating data;
employee history data;
grade and grade history data; and functional group data.
44. A computer-implemented method for promoting employee recognition at an organization, the method comprising:

performing the following operations at one or more computers comprising a memory and a processor:
receiving organizational data of the organization, the organizational data including at least organizational relationship data of a plurality of employees;
receiving recognition details associated with one or more recognition moments;

automatically transmitting the recognition moments to a client device upon the receiving of the recognition details for display in a recognition feed to a user;
discarding a portion of the plurality of recognition feeds; and presenting an un-discarded portion of the plurality of recognition feeds.
45. The method of claim 44, wherein discarding the portion of the plurality of recognition feeds comprises comparing the recognition feeds to a watch list.
46. The method of claim 45, further comprising, adding an entry to the watch list based on a recognition network graph.
47. The method of claim 46, wherein said entry is added to the watch list based on the recognitions received from or provided to another user in accordance with at least one recognition feed.
48. The method of claim 45, further comprising, adding an entry to the watch list based on a selection by the user.
CA2865890A 2011-12-09 2012-12-07 Systems and methods for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery Abandoned CA2865890A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161568999P 2011-12-09 2011-12-09
US61/568,999 2011-12-09
PCT/US2012/068549 WO2013086399A1 (en) 2011-12-09 2012-12-07 Systems and method for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2865890A1 true CA2865890A1 (en) 2013-06-13

Family

ID=48574935

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA2865890A Abandoned CA2865890A1 (en) 2011-12-09 2012-12-07 Systems and methods for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery

Country Status (4)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2865890A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2511013A (en)
HK (1) HK1199969A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2013086399A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9463383B2 (en) 2013-08-22 2016-10-11 Pf Loop Inc. Computer system and method for generating, exchanging, and valuing social currency
WO2015179549A1 (en) * 2014-05-20 2015-11-26 O.C. Tanner Company Systems and methods for providing recognition to an individual
US10361979B2 (en) 2014-08-08 2019-07-23 Pf Loop Inc. Computer system and method for adding attributes to an electronic message on behalf of the message's sender
US20160371625A1 (en) * 2015-06-16 2016-12-22 Globoforce Limited Systems and methods for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080102422A1 (en) * 2006-10-20 2008-05-01 Hayes Marcus P Method of and systems for business and narrative development
US20090276296A1 (en) * 2008-05-01 2009-11-05 Anova Innovations, Llc Business profit resource optimization system and method
BRPI0917246A2 (en) * 2008-08-04 2015-11-10 Quid Inc method and system for measuring an entity's performance, computer readable medium, and methods for determining a competitive landscape for entities in an industry, for connecting competitive entities in an industry, and for predicting an entity's future performance
WO2010045456A1 (en) * 2008-10-15 2010-04-22 Workscape. Inc. Performance driven compensation for enterprise-level human capital management

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HK1199969A1 (en) 2015-07-24
WO2013086399A1 (en) 2013-06-13
GB2511013A (en) 2014-08-20
GB201410082D0 (en) 2014-07-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Patanakul Key attributes of effectiveness in managing project portfolio
Adams et al. Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices
Dubey et al. Green purchasing is key to superior performance: an empirical study
Koners et al. Learning from postproject reviews: A cross‐case analysis
El-Sayegh Project risk management practices in the UAE construction industry
US20140164073A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Analyzing Recognition Data for Talent and Culture Discovery
Thaher et al. The impact of sustainability strategic planning and management on the organizational sustainable performance: A developing-country perspective
Marchalina et al. The effect of internal communication on employees’ commitment to change in Malaysian large companies
Michael et al. Executive perceptions of adopting an environmental certification program
CN106529770A (en) System and method for tracking state of work tasks
Ghaffarianhoseini et al. A BIM readiness & implementation strategy for SME construction companies in the UK
Lin et al. A study of planning and implementation stages in electronic commerce adoption and evaluation: the case of Australian SMEs
CA2865890A1 (en) Systems and methods for analyzing recognition data for talent and culture discovery
Farag et al. The development of an activity zone conceptual framework to improve social value implementation in construction projects using human activity systems
Salih et al. User resistance factors in post ERP implementation
Judd et al. Qualitative methods and the evaluation of community renewal programs in Australia: towards a national framework
Samad et al. Do strategic planning dimensions and transformational leadership contribute to performance? Evidence from the banking sector
Evans et al. Understanding the barriers to food safety scheme certification in the food and drink manufacturing industry in Wales, UK
US20190114591A1 (en) Pipeline data structure for generating custom display views on client devices
Radnor Why lean matters
Warith Assessment of Green IT/IS Within the Aviation Industry Using the Analytic Network Process Approach
Werner High reliability organization theory as an input to manage operational risk in project management
Kurcheeva et al. Goal-Oriented Management in Innovations' Promotion with a Website
Korsakienė et al. Factors impacting and restricting success of organisational changes
US20150120399A1 (en) Business process motivation system with social media and reward integration

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request

Effective date: 20171115

FZDE Discontinued

Effective date: 20210831

FZDE Discontinued

Effective date: 20210831