CA2564635C - A method for reduction of axial power variations of a wind power plant - Google Patents
A method for reduction of axial power variations of a wind power plant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2564635C CA2564635C CA2564635A CA2564635A CA2564635C CA 2564635 C CA2564635 C CA 2564635C CA 2564635 A CA2564635 A CA 2564635A CA 2564635 A CA2564635 A CA 2564635A CA 2564635 C CA2564635 C CA 2564635C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- rotor
- wind
- blades
- pitch
- axial force
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 title description 8
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 abstract description 18
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 34
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000010408 sweeping Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000376 effect on fatigue Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/0204—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor for orientation in relation to wind direction
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/022—Adjusting aerodynamic properties of the blades
- F03D7/0224—Adjusting blade pitch
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/022—Adjusting aerodynamic properties of the blades
- F03D7/024—Adjusting aerodynamic properties of the blades of individual blades
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/0276—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor controlling rotor speed, e.g. variable speed
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/028—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor controlling wind motor output power
- F03D7/0292—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor controlling wind motor output power to reduce fatigue
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/04—Automatic control; Regulation
- F03D7/042—Automatic control; Regulation by means of an electrical or electronic controller
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2240/00—Components
- F05B2240/90—Mounting on supporting structures or systems
- F05B2240/93—Mounting on supporting structures or systems on a structure floating on a liquid surface
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2240/00—Components
- F05B2240/90—Mounting on supporting structures or systems
- F05B2240/95—Mounting on supporting structures or systems offshore
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2260/00—Function
- F05B2260/82—Forecasts
- F05B2260/821—Parameter estimation or prediction
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/10—Purpose of the control system
- F05B2270/1016—Purpose of the control system in variable speed operation
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/10—Purpose of the control system
- F05B2270/109—Purpose of the control system to prolong engine life
- F05B2270/1095—Purpose of the control system to prolong engine life by limiting mechanical stresses
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/30—Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
- F05B2270/321—Wind directions
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/30—Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
- F05B2270/327—Rotor or generator speeds
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/30—Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
- F05B2270/331—Mechanical loads
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/40—Type of control system
- F05B2270/404—Type of control system active, predictive, or anticipative
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/80—Devices generating input signals, e.g. transducers, sensors, cameras or strain gauges
- F05B2270/808—Strain gauges; Load cells
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/70—Wind energy
- Y02E10/72—Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/70—Wind energy
- Y02E10/727—Offshore wind turbines
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Wind Motors (AREA)
Abstract
A method which continuously reduces the variations of the rotor axial force and thus reduces fatigue loads on rotor blades and tower, whilst the resultant output to the generator is not significantly affected or is maintained within acceptable limits in relation to limitations of the drive gear, generator and power grid. A method of using the rotor axial force to actively counter the motions of a floating power plant. The method of using the rotor axial force to actively counter the motions of a floating power plant. The method also describes how rotational forces about the vertical axis (12) of the tower (4) are controlled and countered by cyclic variation of pitch angles and associated forces on the individual rotor blade. The method also describes how the aerodynamic force variation on each individual blade as a consequence of different wind velocities at different heights (vertical wind shear) and in the horizontal direction parallel to the rotor plane (horizontal wind shear) can be reduced.
Description
A METHOD FOR REDUCTION OF AXIAL POWER VARIATIONS OF A WIND POWER PLANT
This invention relates to a method for adjusting the angle of the rotor blades about their own longitudinal axis in a wind power plant in such manner that the thrust of the rotor on the tower is controlled and kept within desired values without the average output of the wind power plant being affected to any noticeable degree.
This has the advantage that the load variations on the rotor blade and tower are reduced, thereby substantially reducing fatigue of these heavily loaded components.
In this patent application the following definitions are used:
1) Momentary wind velocity is defined as the momentary wind velocity that is measured at a particular point in time.
This invention relates to a method for adjusting the angle of the rotor blades about their own longitudinal axis in a wind power plant in such manner that the thrust of the rotor on the tower is controlled and kept within desired values without the average output of the wind power plant being affected to any noticeable degree.
This has the advantage that the load variations on the rotor blade and tower are reduced, thereby substantially reducing fatigue of these heavily loaded components.
In this patent application the following definitions are used:
1) Momentary wind velocity is defined as the momentary wind velocity that is measured at a particular point in time.
2) Average or levelled wind velocity is defined as the average or approximately the average of the momentary wind velocity for a certain period. This period will typically be longer than three seconds and normally in the range of 10 minutes to one hour, but it can also be longer. When the wind velocity is used to control the wind turbine, scaling or fractions of such measured values will also be covered by this definition.
3) Pitch angle in this patent application is defined as the rigid body torsion of a rotor blade about its own longitudinal axis relative to a fixed starting position for this angle. By pitching the blades, the forces on the rotor for a given momentary wind velocity can be varied.
4) Rotor axial force is defined as the thrust that is transferred from the rotor towards the mill housing and which is directed essentially along the rotational axis of the rotor axis. This force consists of the total thrust in the wind direction from the rotor blades and may be both positive and negative at different times during the operation of the wind power plant.
5) Nominal wind velocity is defined as the wind velocity at which the wind power plant first achieves full output. This may typically be in the range of 12-14 m/s.
6) Converter unit is the unit which generates or converts energy from the wind/rotation of the rotor blades into electric power or other mechanical power.
This unit may typically be a generator, a mechanical pump, a gear unit or the like.
In the following description the term "generator" is used for the most part, but. it is clear that generator can be replaced by any type of suitable converter unit as mentioned here.
It is desirable to be able to place large commercial horizontally shafted wind turbines on foundations in deep water. This is desirable in order to be able to increase potential regions for wind power exploitation, to obtain access to areas with high average wind velocities and to be able to build wind parks in proximity to oil and gas installations so as to be able to provide these with electricity using wind power.
In deep water, a floating structure will be advantageous in order to limit the size and costs of towers and foundations.
A floating structure of this kind will primarily be affected by two types of forces that will control the motion pattern and stresses on the floating structure.
These are waves forces against the floating part of the structure and thrust on the rotor from the wind, referred to herein as the rotor axial force.
For a wind power plant on land or in shallow water that is fixed to the ground or seabed, the dominant forces acting on the structure will usually be, in addition to gravitational forces, the thrust on the rotor from the wind.
For large wind power plants (with outputs of typically 1 MW or more) there are today two main types of regulating mechanisms used to control that the rotor provides a constant output power, equal to the nominal output of the plant, for wind velocities that are higher than necessary.in order to achieve full output (nominal output).
One of the methods is stall regulation of the rotor blades. This method turns the blades into the wind so that the angle of attack of the relative wind against the wing profile is increased and the rotor blades reach stall. That is to say that the wind gradually loses its lifting force in that the flows across the rotor blade go from being laminar to being turbulent. Thus, the excess energy is released.
The other regulating method is pitch regulation of the blades whereby the blades are turned in the opposite direction to that in stall regulation so that the wind is released by reducing the angle of attack of the relative wind against the wing profile. Thus, the lifting force of the rotor blade is reduced and less energy is recovered from the wind. This invention relates to this last regulating method which is called pitch regulation in this application.
In the case of large rotor diameters, there are liable to be large variations in the wind velocity across the rotor area both vertically and horizontally. This may cause greater fatigue problems of the blades than in the case of smaller plants if the individual thrust of the blades in the wind direction is not controlled and adjusted expediently. It may also result in large moments which try to turn the rotor out of the wind if the wind velocity at a given time is substantially greater on one half of the rotor (about the vertical axis) than on the opposite half. In prior art technology involving pitch regulation as described above, the rotor rpm for wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity will be regulated so that the rotor output which is equal to the rotor torque multiplied by the angular speed (rotational speed in radians) is kept as constantly equal to the nominal output of the wind power plant as possible. To achieve this, a control unit controls the pitch angle of the rotor blades continuously. Output and rotor axial force are non-linear values as a function of variation of the wind velocity. When the wind velocity changes and the output from the rotor is kept constant by pitching the rotor blades, rotor axial force will change at the same time. The rotor axial force (thrust in the wind direction) may thus have large variations. These force variations cause major fatigue loads on the blades and tower structure, which in many cases can be dimensioning for these structural elements.
To illustrate this, we can look at the effect of pitch regulation in the prior art. If the momentary wind velocity is increased from the nominal wind velocity (e.g., 13 m/s) to twice that (26 m/s) whilst the output and the rotational speed of the rotor are kept constant, the pitch change of the blade will be about 20 degrees in order to prevent the rotor output from increasing at the higher wind velocity. The result of this pitch change of the blades is that the rotor axial force (thrust in the wind direction) is at the same time approximately halved, which causes fatigue loads on the blades and tower structure.
When weather conditions are such that there is, e.g., a 10 minute mean wind velocity of 19 m/s, such fluctuations in the wind velocity will typically occur accompanied by large variations in the total axial force of the blades and the rotor if the output is to be kept constant. Similar fluctuations in the axial force will occur for all average wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity to a greater or lesser extent if pitch regulation according to the prior art is used.
There will always be a certain delay between the aerodynamic momentary torque of the rotor and the generator torque. This is due primarily to forces of inertia of the rotor, drive gear and generator. Since pitch regulation according to the prior art makes use of measured values of rotational speeds or generator output, the pitch regulation will be inaccurate and delayed in relation to the momentary forces acting on the rotor, including the momentary rotor axial force. This means that for sudden decreases in the momentary wind velocity, the rotor blades will have an unduly large blade pitch angle and the rotor axial force may be drastically reduced or even negative. For the above example, in the case of a sudden decrease in wind velocity from 26 m/s to 13 m/s, and if the pitch regulation was not changed sufficiently quickly, this could result in a reduction of the momentary aerodynamic axial force of the rotor from 50% of the nominal axial force at 26 m/s wind to -30% of the nominal axial force at 13 m/s, i.e., in the opposite direction of the wind. Together, this means a change of 80% of the nominal rotor axial force.
Such large fluctuations of the axial force because of the delayed pitch control will especially be a problem for the higher average wind velocities.
This will also mean that rotor blades dimensioned for a low annual average wind velocity could not be used for a location with high annual average wind velocity.
Because of the increased fatigue loads that occur due to the large variations in the thrust of the blades in the wind direction, rotor blades intended for areas with high average wind velocities must be more robustly dimensioned. This may mean more costly and heavier blades. The fact that a location with high average wind velocity will have more operating hours will also increase the requirement of fatigue strength for the rotor blades.
For a floating wind power plant, the above-described effect that increased wind velocity reduces the rotor axial force because of the pitch regulation (for wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity) may also have negative effects on the motion pattern of the wind power plant. When the tower and rotor move into the wind, the relative wind velocity against the rotor will increase, which will result in a reduced rotor thrust because the pitch regulation tries to maintain constant output, which in turn will increase the movement of the tower against the wind.
Conversely, when the tower and rotor move back in the same direction as the wind, the relative wind velocity against the rotor will decrease and, with the prior art, the blades will automatically be pitched (turned) to maintain nominal output to the generator. This in turn results in increased rotor thrust, which in its turn will increase the movement of the tower in the direction of the wind. The result of this is an extra excitation and intensification of the motions of the tower if prior art pitch regulation is used. This has been found to lead to large increases in fatigue loads for floating wind power towers.
Patent No. US-4201514 describes a method for regulating the pitch angle of the individual rotor blades in relation to variations of the wind velocity.. The regulation describes how the torque of the individual blades about the rotor axis is automatically held constant in changing wind velocities. This has the same effect as for other prior art as described above. That is to say that the forces acting in the direction of the rotational direction of the,blades, i.e., perpendicular to the wind direction, and which cause the blade to rotate, are held constant. A side effect of this is that the thrust of the blade in the wind direction will vary in the same way as described above for other prior art. Thus, this prior art will have the same effect on fatigue of the blades and tower because of varying thrust on the rotor blades when an attempt is made to hold the rotor torque constant.
The object of the invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art.
In the method described below, the disadvantages of the prior art have been remedied or eliminated.
In the method described below, the disadvantages of the prior art have been remedied or eliminated.
In one aspect of the invention, a method is provided a method for controlling the output of a wind power plant comprising a converter unit, the method comprising establishing an output power range for the converter unit, measuring the output power of the converter unit, and if the output power of the converter unit is within said range, changing the pitch angle of the rotor blades in order to minimise variations in the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction individually or collectively, and if the output power of the converter is outside this range, changing the pitch angle of the rotor blade in order to bringing the power output within the range.
In one embodiment of the invention, variations of the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction are minimised by regulating towards a calculated target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction, the target value for the thrust in the wind direction being different for different average wind velocities.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is adjusted in relation to average converter unit output or rotor speed over a given period of time.
In still another embodiment of the invention, the target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is pre-defined and related to given average wind velocities.
In one embodiment of the invention, the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is in addition adjusted by changing the rotor rpm by adjusting the generator rotation resistance moment and/or rotor brakes.
In yet another embodiment, the momentary thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is determined directly or indirectly by means of strain gauges, wind velocity measurements, by measuring geometric deflection of the blades, measuring the generator torque and/or measuring the generator output together with 5a simultaneous measurement of the pitch angles of the blade or blades, and/or by measuring or using the pitch moment of the blades about the rotational axis of the pitch bearing either by mounting the blades leaning backwards in the pitch bearing, or by shaping the blades so that the impact point of the wind on the blade is behind the rotational axis of the pitch bearing in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor.
In one embodiment, the pitch angle of the rotor blades is in addition changed with a view to minimising direction errors for the wind power plant.
In one embodiment, the direction error is corrected if it is outside a given range.
In another embodiment of the invention, the pitch angle of the rotor blades is adjusted differently for different rotational positions.
In one embodiment, the pitch angles of the rotor blades are adjusted individually and/or independent of one another.
In one embodiment, the wind field in a plane substantially perpendicular to the wind direction is predicted by using directly or indirectly measured values of the wind forces acting on the rotor blade or blades that is/are at the front in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor.
In one embodiment, the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is used actively to counteract motions of the wind power plant tower by regulating the pitch angles of the rotor blades.
In one embodiment of the invention, one or more anemometers/wind gauges are placed in a suitable location or locations on the wind power plant so that the spatial distribution of the wind velocity can be recorded and interpolations between the different anemometers can be made to form a picture of the distribution of the wind across the sweeping area of the rotor. This can be done by placing anemometers at substantially different heights and in substantially different horizontal positions.
This spatial distribution of the momentary wind velocity can then be used to individually regulate the pitch of the rotor blades, optionally all the blades may be pitch-regulated collectively.
The wind field in a plane that is essentially perpendicular to the wind direction can be predicted by using directly or indirectly measured values of the wind forces which act on the rotor blade or blades which is/are at the front in relation to the rotational direction of rotor.
The rotor may advantageously be positioned downwind of the tower so that the anemometers record the wind velocity before it impinges on the rotor. In addition, directly or indirectly measured values of the thrust on the blade that is at the front in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor, of a given blade can be used to predict the wind field into which the given blade will move. In this way, the optimal pitch angle of the blades can be calculated in advance so that there is little or no delay between the aerodynamic forces and the pitch response of the rotor blades. Thus, sudden changes in the momentary wind velocity can be predicted.
By using the horizontal distance between the upwind mounted anemometers and the vertical plane of the rotor and the wind velocity, the time delay from when the measurements are made until the actual wind velocity occurs in the rotor can be calculated. The controller unit that controls the pitch regulations is given access to all these measurements and can at any given time use this information to optimise the pitch angles of the blades. Thus, it is possible to avoid in particular the large rotor axial force reductions which occur in connection with sudden momentary decreases in the momentary wind velocity because the prior art pitch regulation does not take place sufficiently quickly.
For momentary wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity of the wind power plant, the blades will initially be turned so that the axial force on the rotor is reduced. This is countered by increasing the rotational speed of the rotor by means of reduced or no pitch response whilst the generator torque optionally at the same time is reduced in accordance with input from the control unit which also will help to increase the rotational speed of the rotor. Both the rotor axial force and the output of the generator can then be held almost constant at optimal pitch angle within a small wind velocity increase. At a wind increase of about 10%, the rotational speed according to this method must be increased by about 10% to obtain both unchanged rotor axial force and unchanged output to the generator. The pitch angle must be changed at the same time. A similar method is used when there is a decrease in momentary wind velocity, but in that case the rotational speed of the rotor is reduced whilst the generator torque is, optionally simultaneously, increased in accordance with input from the control unit.
For larger changes in the momentary wind velocity, the following is done:
When there is a decrease in the momentary wind velocity compared to the average wind velocity measured over a longer period than the updating frequency of the pitch regulation, e.g., over a 10 minute period, the pitch angle of the blades will be changed less than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged, but that the output to the generator is slightly less than the nominal output. A 10% decrease in wind velocity gives a reduction in output of about 10% whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged.
Similarly, for a 10% increase in wind velocity, a smaller change of the pitch angle of the blades will be effected than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged but the output to the generator is slightly greater than the nominal output. A 10%
increase of the momentary wind velocity gives an increase in output power of about 10%
whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged. By combining the two outputs described above, the overall result will be that the momentary wind velocity can vary by typically +/- 20% without the rotor axial force varying. Since the attendant generator output variations will be short-term and will fluctuate around the rated power of the generator, the average generator output will be almost unchanged, i.e., equal to the nominal output (rated power), whilst the axial force for a given average wind velocity can be held constant or almost constant, typically within a +/-20% variation of the momentary wind velocity.
This unit may typically be a generator, a mechanical pump, a gear unit or the like.
In the following description the term "generator" is used for the most part, but. it is clear that generator can be replaced by any type of suitable converter unit as mentioned here.
It is desirable to be able to place large commercial horizontally shafted wind turbines on foundations in deep water. This is desirable in order to be able to increase potential regions for wind power exploitation, to obtain access to areas with high average wind velocities and to be able to build wind parks in proximity to oil and gas installations so as to be able to provide these with electricity using wind power.
In deep water, a floating structure will be advantageous in order to limit the size and costs of towers and foundations.
A floating structure of this kind will primarily be affected by two types of forces that will control the motion pattern and stresses on the floating structure.
These are waves forces against the floating part of the structure and thrust on the rotor from the wind, referred to herein as the rotor axial force.
For a wind power plant on land or in shallow water that is fixed to the ground or seabed, the dominant forces acting on the structure will usually be, in addition to gravitational forces, the thrust on the rotor from the wind.
For large wind power plants (with outputs of typically 1 MW or more) there are today two main types of regulating mechanisms used to control that the rotor provides a constant output power, equal to the nominal output of the plant, for wind velocities that are higher than necessary.in order to achieve full output (nominal output).
One of the methods is stall regulation of the rotor blades. This method turns the blades into the wind so that the angle of attack of the relative wind against the wing profile is increased and the rotor blades reach stall. That is to say that the wind gradually loses its lifting force in that the flows across the rotor blade go from being laminar to being turbulent. Thus, the excess energy is released.
The other regulating method is pitch regulation of the blades whereby the blades are turned in the opposite direction to that in stall regulation so that the wind is released by reducing the angle of attack of the relative wind against the wing profile. Thus, the lifting force of the rotor blade is reduced and less energy is recovered from the wind. This invention relates to this last regulating method which is called pitch regulation in this application.
In the case of large rotor diameters, there are liable to be large variations in the wind velocity across the rotor area both vertically and horizontally. This may cause greater fatigue problems of the blades than in the case of smaller plants if the individual thrust of the blades in the wind direction is not controlled and adjusted expediently. It may also result in large moments which try to turn the rotor out of the wind if the wind velocity at a given time is substantially greater on one half of the rotor (about the vertical axis) than on the opposite half. In prior art technology involving pitch regulation as described above, the rotor rpm for wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity will be regulated so that the rotor output which is equal to the rotor torque multiplied by the angular speed (rotational speed in radians) is kept as constantly equal to the nominal output of the wind power plant as possible. To achieve this, a control unit controls the pitch angle of the rotor blades continuously. Output and rotor axial force are non-linear values as a function of variation of the wind velocity. When the wind velocity changes and the output from the rotor is kept constant by pitching the rotor blades, rotor axial force will change at the same time. The rotor axial force (thrust in the wind direction) may thus have large variations. These force variations cause major fatigue loads on the blades and tower structure, which in many cases can be dimensioning for these structural elements.
To illustrate this, we can look at the effect of pitch regulation in the prior art. If the momentary wind velocity is increased from the nominal wind velocity (e.g., 13 m/s) to twice that (26 m/s) whilst the output and the rotational speed of the rotor are kept constant, the pitch change of the blade will be about 20 degrees in order to prevent the rotor output from increasing at the higher wind velocity. The result of this pitch change of the blades is that the rotor axial force (thrust in the wind direction) is at the same time approximately halved, which causes fatigue loads on the blades and tower structure.
When weather conditions are such that there is, e.g., a 10 minute mean wind velocity of 19 m/s, such fluctuations in the wind velocity will typically occur accompanied by large variations in the total axial force of the blades and the rotor if the output is to be kept constant. Similar fluctuations in the axial force will occur for all average wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity to a greater or lesser extent if pitch regulation according to the prior art is used.
There will always be a certain delay between the aerodynamic momentary torque of the rotor and the generator torque. This is due primarily to forces of inertia of the rotor, drive gear and generator. Since pitch regulation according to the prior art makes use of measured values of rotational speeds or generator output, the pitch regulation will be inaccurate and delayed in relation to the momentary forces acting on the rotor, including the momentary rotor axial force. This means that for sudden decreases in the momentary wind velocity, the rotor blades will have an unduly large blade pitch angle and the rotor axial force may be drastically reduced or even negative. For the above example, in the case of a sudden decrease in wind velocity from 26 m/s to 13 m/s, and if the pitch regulation was not changed sufficiently quickly, this could result in a reduction of the momentary aerodynamic axial force of the rotor from 50% of the nominal axial force at 26 m/s wind to -30% of the nominal axial force at 13 m/s, i.e., in the opposite direction of the wind. Together, this means a change of 80% of the nominal rotor axial force.
Such large fluctuations of the axial force because of the delayed pitch control will especially be a problem for the higher average wind velocities.
This will also mean that rotor blades dimensioned for a low annual average wind velocity could not be used for a location with high annual average wind velocity.
Because of the increased fatigue loads that occur due to the large variations in the thrust of the blades in the wind direction, rotor blades intended for areas with high average wind velocities must be more robustly dimensioned. This may mean more costly and heavier blades. The fact that a location with high average wind velocity will have more operating hours will also increase the requirement of fatigue strength for the rotor blades.
For a floating wind power plant, the above-described effect that increased wind velocity reduces the rotor axial force because of the pitch regulation (for wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity) may also have negative effects on the motion pattern of the wind power plant. When the tower and rotor move into the wind, the relative wind velocity against the rotor will increase, which will result in a reduced rotor thrust because the pitch regulation tries to maintain constant output, which in turn will increase the movement of the tower against the wind.
Conversely, when the tower and rotor move back in the same direction as the wind, the relative wind velocity against the rotor will decrease and, with the prior art, the blades will automatically be pitched (turned) to maintain nominal output to the generator. This in turn results in increased rotor thrust, which in its turn will increase the movement of the tower in the direction of the wind. The result of this is an extra excitation and intensification of the motions of the tower if prior art pitch regulation is used. This has been found to lead to large increases in fatigue loads for floating wind power towers.
Patent No. US-4201514 describes a method for regulating the pitch angle of the individual rotor blades in relation to variations of the wind velocity.. The regulation describes how the torque of the individual blades about the rotor axis is automatically held constant in changing wind velocities. This has the same effect as for other prior art as described above. That is to say that the forces acting in the direction of the rotational direction of the,blades, i.e., perpendicular to the wind direction, and which cause the blade to rotate, are held constant. A side effect of this is that the thrust of the blade in the wind direction will vary in the same way as described above for other prior art. Thus, this prior art will have the same effect on fatigue of the blades and tower because of varying thrust on the rotor blades when an attempt is made to hold the rotor torque constant.
The object of the invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art.
In the method described below, the disadvantages of the prior art have been remedied or eliminated.
In the method described below, the disadvantages of the prior art have been remedied or eliminated.
In one aspect of the invention, a method is provided a method for controlling the output of a wind power plant comprising a converter unit, the method comprising establishing an output power range for the converter unit, measuring the output power of the converter unit, and if the output power of the converter unit is within said range, changing the pitch angle of the rotor blades in order to minimise variations in the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction individually or collectively, and if the output power of the converter is outside this range, changing the pitch angle of the rotor blade in order to bringing the power output within the range.
In one embodiment of the invention, variations of the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction are minimised by regulating towards a calculated target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction, the target value for the thrust in the wind direction being different for different average wind velocities.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is adjusted in relation to average converter unit output or rotor speed over a given period of time.
In still another embodiment of the invention, the target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is pre-defined and related to given average wind velocities.
In one embodiment of the invention, the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is in addition adjusted by changing the rotor rpm by adjusting the generator rotation resistance moment and/or rotor brakes.
In yet another embodiment, the momentary thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is determined directly or indirectly by means of strain gauges, wind velocity measurements, by measuring geometric deflection of the blades, measuring the generator torque and/or measuring the generator output together with 5a simultaneous measurement of the pitch angles of the blade or blades, and/or by measuring or using the pitch moment of the blades about the rotational axis of the pitch bearing either by mounting the blades leaning backwards in the pitch bearing, or by shaping the blades so that the impact point of the wind on the blade is behind the rotational axis of the pitch bearing in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor.
In one embodiment, the pitch angle of the rotor blades is in addition changed with a view to minimising direction errors for the wind power plant.
In one embodiment, the direction error is corrected if it is outside a given range.
In another embodiment of the invention, the pitch angle of the rotor blades is adjusted differently for different rotational positions.
In one embodiment, the pitch angles of the rotor blades are adjusted individually and/or independent of one another.
In one embodiment, the wind field in a plane substantially perpendicular to the wind direction is predicted by using directly or indirectly measured values of the wind forces acting on the rotor blade or blades that is/are at the front in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor.
In one embodiment, the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is used actively to counteract motions of the wind power plant tower by regulating the pitch angles of the rotor blades.
In one embodiment of the invention, one or more anemometers/wind gauges are placed in a suitable location or locations on the wind power plant so that the spatial distribution of the wind velocity can be recorded and interpolations between the different anemometers can be made to form a picture of the distribution of the wind across the sweeping area of the rotor. This can be done by placing anemometers at substantially different heights and in substantially different horizontal positions.
This spatial distribution of the momentary wind velocity can then be used to individually regulate the pitch of the rotor blades, optionally all the blades may be pitch-regulated collectively.
The wind field in a plane that is essentially perpendicular to the wind direction can be predicted by using directly or indirectly measured values of the wind forces which act on the rotor blade or blades which is/are at the front in relation to the rotational direction of rotor.
The rotor may advantageously be positioned downwind of the tower so that the anemometers record the wind velocity before it impinges on the rotor. In addition, directly or indirectly measured values of the thrust on the blade that is at the front in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor, of a given blade can be used to predict the wind field into which the given blade will move. In this way, the optimal pitch angle of the blades can be calculated in advance so that there is little or no delay between the aerodynamic forces and the pitch response of the rotor blades. Thus, sudden changes in the momentary wind velocity can be predicted.
By using the horizontal distance between the upwind mounted anemometers and the vertical plane of the rotor and the wind velocity, the time delay from when the measurements are made until the actual wind velocity occurs in the rotor can be calculated. The controller unit that controls the pitch regulations is given access to all these measurements and can at any given time use this information to optimise the pitch angles of the blades. Thus, it is possible to avoid in particular the large rotor axial force reductions which occur in connection with sudden momentary decreases in the momentary wind velocity because the prior art pitch regulation does not take place sufficiently quickly.
For momentary wind velocities above the nominal wind velocity of the wind power plant, the blades will initially be turned so that the axial force on the rotor is reduced. This is countered by increasing the rotational speed of the rotor by means of reduced or no pitch response whilst the generator torque optionally at the same time is reduced in accordance with input from the control unit which also will help to increase the rotational speed of the rotor. Both the rotor axial force and the output of the generator can then be held almost constant at optimal pitch angle within a small wind velocity increase. At a wind increase of about 10%, the rotational speed according to this method must be increased by about 10% to obtain both unchanged rotor axial force and unchanged output to the generator. The pitch angle must be changed at the same time. A similar method is used when there is a decrease in momentary wind velocity, but in that case the rotational speed of the rotor is reduced whilst the generator torque is, optionally simultaneously, increased in accordance with input from the control unit.
For larger changes in the momentary wind velocity, the following is done:
When there is a decrease in the momentary wind velocity compared to the average wind velocity measured over a longer period than the updating frequency of the pitch regulation, e.g., over a 10 minute period, the pitch angle of the blades will be changed less than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged, but that the output to the generator is slightly less than the nominal output. A 10% decrease in wind velocity gives a reduction in output of about 10% whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged.
Similarly, for a 10% increase in wind velocity, a smaller change of the pitch angle of the blades will be effected than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged but the output to the generator is slightly greater than the nominal output. A 10%
increase of the momentary wind velocity gives an increase in output power of about 10%
whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged. By combining the two outputs described above, the overall result will be that the momentary wind velocity can vary by typically +/- 20% without the rotor axial force varying. Since the attendant generator output variations will be short-term and will fluctuate around the rated power of the generator, the average generator output will be almost unchanged, i.e., equal to the nominal output (rated power), whilst the axial force for a given average wind velocity can be held constant or almost constant, typically within a +/-20% variation of the momentary wind velocity.
For a given average wind velocity, the rotor axial force (target value), which corresponds to the nominal output of the generator, can be calculated.
Acceptable maximum and minimum values for the generator output variations around a mean value can be pre-programmed, and the pitch controller unit will then calculate optimal momentary pitch angles so that the rotor axial force is held as constant as possible around the said calculated target value whilst the generator output is maintained within the pre-programmed bandwidth.
The calculated target value for the rotor axial force will therefore vary with different average wind velocities. Within each average wind velocity, an attempt will then be made to keep the axial force almost constant using pitch regulation.
The average wind velocity may, for example, be the mean of the last 10 minutes.
Optionally, pre-calculated values may be used for the target values of the axial force for given average wind velocity intervals, e.g., divided into intervals of 0.1 m/s differences.
For momentary wind velocity variations in excess of about +/- 20%, pitch regulation can be carried out giving priority to not varying the generator output by more than the typical approximately +/- 10% as described above. On such large variations of the momentary wind velocity, the rotor axial force will start to vary, but also in these cases this variation will be substantially less than for pitch regulation according to the prior art.
Since an average value of the wind velocity over a longer period of time, e.g., a 10 minute average, varies much less than the momentary wind velocity variations, the described method will ensure that the rotor axial force variations will be considerably reduced, which will have a positive effect on the fatigue loads on the tower and rotor.
The same method as described above can also be used to actively regulate the rotor axial force in relation to a given mean value. If the rotor axial force in this way is actively controlled with varying value, this can be used, e.g., to apply forces to the tower in counter phase with its motions so that the motions of the tower are dampened.
The motions of the tower can, e.g., be recorded using an accelerometer.
Furthermore, the axial force can be used actively in a similar manner to counter any forces that try to turn the rotor out of the wind. This can be done by controlling the individual force of the rotor blades in the wind direction so that any torques that try to turn the rotor and/or the nacelle and/or the tower out of the wind are countered, reduced or eliminated by cyclically changing the individual pitch angle of the blades according to the physical position of each individual blade at any given time, so that the axial force on the rotor is greater on one side or the other of the vertical axis of the rotor, as required. When a given rotor blade passes one side of the vertical axis of the tower, the pitch angle is increased, e.g., by 0.5 degrees, and when the same blade passes the opposite side, the pitch angle is decreased correspondingly. Therefore, this does not need to have any effect on the total rotor output or the total rotor axial force. The extra cyclic pitch variation is superposed only on the calculated pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the total rotor axial force. This described cyclic pitch regulation can also be used to actively control the rotor so that parts of, or optionally the whole of the wind power plant in the case of a floating plant, can be held in the desired position relative to the wind direction. Thus, it is possible to eliminate or reduce the size or number of motors which according to prior art turn the mill housing, or optionally the whole tower in the event the mill housing is non-rotatably mounted on the tower of a floating plant, in the desired position relative to the wind.
Furthermore, the thrust variations in the wind direction on each individual blade can be reduced by changing the pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the momentary thrust of the blade in the wind direction.
The blade can then be controlled individually in relation to its position in its orbit and to measured values of the wind velocities in different positions in or around the sweeping area of the rotor.
The measured axial force will be recorded and included in the pitch controller unit for calculation of optimal pitch angle at any given time according to the described method.
Instead of just using measured wind velocity and pitch angle to calculate the rotor axial force, several other direct or indirect methods can be used.
Since the blades are mounted leaning backwards in the pitch bearing, i.e., the longitudinal axis of the blade deviates slightly from the pitch bearing shaft axis so that the longitudinal axis of the blades does not intersect the rotor rotational axis, and the pitch moment which then occurs can be measured via hydraulic pressure via the blade pitch control system and the axial force can then be calculated;
or By using strain gauges on the blades and/or on the main shaft of the rotor and/or on other parts of the wind power plant; or Indirectly by measuring the pitch angles of the blade(s) and the rotor torque directly or by recording other parameters such as the generator torque, output etc.
and then the corresponding rotor axial force can be calculated.
By measuring deflection of the blades using a mechanical or electronic measuring system.
Example of a preferred method There now follows a description of a non-limiting example of a preferred method 5 which is illustrated in the attached drawings, wherein:
Fig. I shows a floating wind power plant 1 with rotor 2 which may have a horizontally or substantially horizontally mounted rotor axis 11 mounted downwind of tower 4. The figure also shows mill housing 3, anemometers 5, anchor connection 6 and anchor 7.
Acceptable maximum and minimum values for the generator output variations around a mean value can be pre-programmed, and the pitch controller unit will then calculate optimal momentary pitch angles so that the rotor axial force is held as constant as possible around the said calculated target value whilst the generator output is maintained within the pre-programmed bandwidth.
The calculated target value for the rotor axial force will therefore vary with different average wind velocities. Within each average wind velocity, an attempt will then be made to keep the axial force almost constant using pitch regulation.
The average wind velocity may, for example, be the mean of the last 10 minutes.
Optionally, pre-calculated values may be used for the target values of the axial force for given average wind velocity intervals, e.g., divided into intervals of 0.1 m/s differences.
For momentary wind velocity variations in excess of about +/- 20%, pitch regulation can be carried out giving priority to not varying the generator output by more than the typical approximately +/- 10% as described above. On such large variations of the momentary wind velocity, the rotor axial force will start to vary, but also in these cases this variation will be substantially less than for pitch regulation according to the prior art.
Since an average value of the wind velocity over a longer period of time, e.g., a 10 minute average, varies much less than the momentary wind velocity variations, the described method will ensure that the rotor axial force variations will be considerably reduced, which will have a positive effect on the fatigue loads on the tower and rotor.
The same method as described above can also be used to actively regulate the rotor axial force in relation to a given mean value. If the rotor axial force in this way is actively controlled with varying value, this can be used, e.g., to apply forces to the tower in counter phase with its motions so that the motions of the tower are dampened.
The motions of the tower can, e.g., be recorded using an accelerometer.
Furthermore, the axial force can be used actively in a similar manner to counter any forces that try to turn the rotor out of the wind. This can be done by controlling the individual force of the rotor blades in the wind direction so that any torques that try to turn the rotor and/or the nacelle and/or the tower out of the wind are countered, reduced or eliminated by cyclically changing the individual pitch angle of the blades according to the physical position of each individual blade at any given time, so that the axial force on the rotor is greater on one side or the other of the vertical axis of the rotor, as required. When a given rotor blade passes one side of the vertical axis of the tower, the pitch angle is increased, e.g., by 0.5 degrees, and when the same blade passes the opposite side, the pitch angle is decreased correspondingly. Therefore, this does not need to have any effect on the total rotor output or the total rotor axial force. The extra cyclic pitch variation is superposed only on the calculated pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the total rotor axial force. This described cyclic pitch regulation can also be used to actively control the rotor so that parts of, or optionally the whole of the wind power plant in the case of a floating plant, can be held in the desired position relative to the wind direction. Thus, it is possible to eliminate or reduce the size or number of motors which according to prior art turn the mill housing, or optionally the whole tower in the event the mill housing is non-rotatably mounted on the tower of a floating plant, in the desired position relative to the wind.
Furthermore, the thrust variations in the wind direction on each individual blade can be reduced by changing the pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the momentary thrust of the blade in the wind direction.
The blade can then be controlled individually in relation to its position in its orbit and to measured values of the wind velocities in different positions in or around the sweeping area of the rotor.
The measured axial force will be recorded and included in the pitch controller unit for calculation of optimal pitch angle at any given time according to the described method.
Instead of just using measured wind velocity and pitch angle to calculate the rotor axial force, several other direct or indirect methods can be used.
Since the blades are mounted leaning backwards in the pitch bearing, i.e., the longitudinal axis of the blade deviates slightly from the pitch bearing shaft axis so that the longitudinal axis of the blades does not intersect the rotor rotational axis, and the pitch moment which then occurs can be measured via hydraulic pressure via the blade pitch control system and the axial force can then be calculated;
or By using strain gauges on the blades and/or on the main shaft of the rotor and/or on other parts of the wind power plant; or Indirectly by measuring the pitch angles of the blade(s) and the rotor torque directly or by recording other parameters such as the generator torque, output etc.
and then the corresponding rotor axial force can be calculated.
By measuring deflection of the blades using a mechanical or electronic measuring system.
Example of a preferred method There now follows a description of a non-limiting example of a preferred method 5 which is illustrated in the attached drawings, wherein:
Fig. I shows a floating wind power plant 1 with rotor 2 which may have a horizontally or substantially horizontally mounted rotor axis 11 mounted downwind of tower 4. The figure also shows mill housing 3, anemometers 5, anchor connection 6 and anchor 7.
10 Fig. 2 shows a wind power plant 1 located on land or in shallow water with rotor 2 which has a horizontally or substantially horizontally mounted rotor axis 11 mounted upwind of tower 4. The figure also shows mill housing 3 and anemometers 5.
Fig. 3 shows a wind power plant 1 that is located either on land or in shallow water or floating in water with rotor blades 13 which are rotatably mounted about their longitudinal axis or substantially about their longitudinal axis 14 with pitch bearings 10.
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the method according to the invention.
Fig. 5 is a flow diagram for an optional part of the method according to the invention.
A wind power plant 1 with a horizontal or substantially horizontal rotor axis consists of one or more rotor blades 1) which together form a rotor 2, where the rotor blades in a coordinated manner or individually can be turned (pitched) around their own longitudinal axis or essentially around their own longitudinal axis primarily in order to control the rotor 2 output to the generator (not shown), and where the rotor shaft is secured in a mill housing 3 and the rotor shaft is connected to the generator optionally via a transmission system (gear). The pitch regulation of the rotor blades is carried out by a pitch control unit which on the basis of different recorded operational information, wind measurements etc. transmits a signal to the pitch motors indicating the amount of the required change in pitch angle at any given time.
The mill housing may be mounted on a tower 4 which is fixedly mounted on land or on the seabed 8 or which is a part of a floating device or which itself constitutes a floating device with optionally one or more anchor connections 6 to an anchor 7 on the seabed 8. The design of the anchor system 6, 7 is of no importance for the described method.
One of the objects of the method described below is to reduce the variations of the rotor axial force compared with the prior art, whilst the resultant output to the generator is not significantly affected or is maintained within acceptable limits in relation to limitations of the drive gear, generator and power grid. It is also an object of the method to use the rotor axial force to actively counter the motions of a floating wind power plant. Furthermore, it is an object of the described method to control and counter rotational forces about the vertical axis 12 of the tower and to reduce the aerodynamic force variation on each individual blade through a whole rotation cycle resulting from different wind velocities at different levels (vertical wind shear) and in the horizontal direction parallel to the rotor plane (horizontal wind shear).
One or more anemometers 5 are placed in a suitable location or locations on the wind power plant 1 so that the spatial distribution of the wind velocity can advantageously be recorded and interpolations between the different anemometers can be made to form a picture of the distribution of the wind across the sweeping area of the rotor. This can be done by placing anemometers at substantially different levels and in substantially different horizontal positions. This spatial distribution of the momentary wind velocity can then be used to individually regulate the pitch of the rotor blades, optionally all the blades can be pitch-regulated collectively.
The rotor 2 may advantageously be positioned downwind of the tower 4 so that the anemometers record the wind velocity before it impinges on the rotor. In this way, the optimal pitch angle of the blades can be calculated in advance so that there is little or no delay between aerodynamic forces and the pitch response of the rotor blades. Thus, sudden changes of the momentary wind velocity can be predicted.
By means of the horizontal distance between the upwind-mounted anemometers and the vertical plane of the rotor and the wind velocity, the time delay from when the measurements are made until the effect of the actual measured wind velocity occurs in the rotor can be calculated. The controller unit (not shown) that controls the pitch regulation is given access to all these measurements and can at any given time use this information to optimise the pitch angles of the blades 13. Thus, it is possible to avoid in particular the large rotor axial force reductions which occur on sudden momentary decreases in the momentary wind velocity because the prior art pitch regulation has a time delay.
In the cases where the average velocity is above the nominal wind velocity for the wind power plant 1 and the momentary wind velocity then increases beyond the given average wind velocity, the rotational speed of the rotor 2 according to this method will be increased by means of reduced pitch response compared to the prior art, whilst the generator torque is, optionally simultaneously, reduced in accordance with input from the control unit, which will also help to increase the rotational speed of the rotor 2. Since the rotor axial force in general is increased on increased rpm for a given rotor output, the reduced rotor axial force resulting from the pitch turning of the blades in response to the increased momentary wind velocity can be compensated. The result is that within a small wind velocity increase, both the rotor axial force and the output of the generator can be held almost constant by increasing the rotational speed of the rotor and with optimal pitch angle. At wind increase of about 10%, the rotational speed must according to this method be increased by about 10% to obtain both unchanged rotor axial force and unchanged output to the generator. The pitch angle must be changed at the same time. A similar method is used when there is a decrease in momentary wind velocity, but in that case, the rotational speed of the rotor is decreased whilst the generator torque is, optionally simultaneously, increased in accordance with input from the control unit.
For larger changes in the momentary wind velocity the following is done:
When there is a decrease the momentary wind velocity compared to the average wind velocity measured over a longer period of time than the updating frequency of the pitch regulation, e.g., over a 10 minute period, the pitch angle of the blades is changed less than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged but the output to the generator is slightly less than the nominal output. A 10% decrease in wind velocity gives a reduction in output of about 10% whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged.
Similarly, for a 10% increase in the momentary wind velocity, a smaller change of the pitch angle of the blades will be effected than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged but the output to the generator is slightly greater than the nominal output. A 10% increase in the momentary wind velocity gives an increase in output of about 10%, whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged. By combining the two outputs described above, the overall result will be that the momentary wind velocity can vary by typically +/- 20% without the rotor axial force varying. Since the attendant generator output variations will be short-term and fluctuate around the nominal output of the wind power plant or the rated power of the generator, the average generator output will be almost unchanged, i.e., equal to the nominal output (rated power), whilst the axial force for a given average wind velocity can be held constant or almost constant, typically within a +/-20%
variation of the momentary wind velocity.
For a given average wind velocity and rotor rotational speed, the rotor axial force (target value), which corresponds to the nominal output of the generator, can be calculated. Acceptable maximum and minimum values for generator output variations around a mean value can be pre-programmed, and the pitch controller unit will then calculate optimal momentary pitch angles (in response to the momentary wind velocity) so that the rotor axial force is held as constant as possible around said calculated target value whilst the generator output is maintained within the pre-programmed bandwidth.
The calculated target value for rotor axial force will vary with different average wind velocities. Within each average wind velocity, an attempt will then be made to keep the axial force almost constant around this target value using pitch regulation. The average wind velocity may, for example, be the mean of the last 10 minutes. Optionally, pre-calculated values may be used for the target values of the axial force for given average wind velocity intervals, e.g., divided into intervals of 0.1 m/s differences.
For momentary wind velocity variations in excess of about +/- 20% as described above, pitch regulation can be carried out giving priority to not varying the generator output by more than the typical bandwidth of about +/- 10% as described.
On such large variations of the momentary wind velocity, the rotor axial force will start to vary, but also in these cases this variation will be substantially less than for pitch regulation according to the prior art.
Since an average value of the wind velocity over a longer period of time, e.g., 10 minute mean, varies much less over time than the momentary wind velocity variations, the described method will ensure that the rotor axial force variations will be considerably reduced, which will have a positive effect on the fatigue loads on the tower and rotor.
The same method as described above can also be used to actively regulate the rotor axial force around a given mean value. If the rotor axial force is in this way actively controlled with varying value, this can be used, e.g., to apply forces to the tower 1 in counter phase with its motions so that the motions of the tower are dampened. This is particularly advantageous for floating wind power plants.
The control unit will in this case also have access to the motions of the tower. The motions of the tower can, e.g., be recorded using an accelerometer or other suitable measuring method.
Fig. 3 shows a wind power plant 1 that is located either on land or in shallow water or floating in water with rotor blades 13 which are rotatably mounted about their longitudinal axis or substantially about their longitudinal axis 14 with pitch bearings 10.
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the method according to the invention.
Fig. 5 is a flow diagram for an optional part of the method according to the invention.
A wind power plant 1 with a horizontal or substantially horizontal rotor axis consists of one or more rotor blades 1) which together form a rotor 2, where the rotor blades in a coordinated manner or individually can be turned (pitched) around their own longitudinal axis or essentially around their own longitudinal axis primarily in order to control the rotor 2 output to the generator (not shown), and where the rotor shaft is secured in a mill housing 3 and the rotor shaft is connected to the generator optionally via a transmission system (gear). The pitch regulation of the rotor blades is carried out by a pitch control unit which on the basis of different recorded operational information, wind measurements etc. transmits a signal to the pitch motors indicating the amount of the required change in pitch angle at any given time.
The mill housing may be mounted on a tower 4 which is fixedly mounted on land or on the seabed 8 or which is a part of a floating device or which itself constitutes a floating device with optionally one or more anchor connections 6 to an anchor 7 on the seabed 8. The design of the anchor system 6, 7 is of no importance for the described method.
One of the objects of the method described below is to reduce the variations of the rotor axial force compared with the prior art, whilst the resultant output to the generator is not significantly affected or is maintained within acceptable limits in relation to limitations of the drive gear, generator and power grid. It is also an object of the method to use the rotor axial force to actively counter the motions of a floating wind power plant. Furthermore, it is an object of the described method to control and counter rotational forces about the vertical axis 12 of the tower and to reduce the aerodynamic force variation on each individual blade through a whole rotation cycle resulting from different wind velocities at different levels (vertical wind shear) and in the horizontal direction parallel to the rotor plane (horizontal wind shear).
One or more anemometers 5 are placed in a suitable location or locations on the wind power plant 1 so that the spatial distribution of the wind velocity can advantageously be recorded and interpolations between the different anemometers can be made to form a picture of the distribution of the wind across the sweeping area of the rotor. This can be done by placing anemometers at substantially different levels and in substantially different horizontal positions. This spatial distribution of the momentary wind velocity can then be used to individually regulate the pitch of the rotor blades, optionally all the blades can be pitch-regulated collectively.
The rotor 2 may advantageously be positioned downwind of the tower 4 so that the anemometers record the wind velocity before it impinges on the rotor. In this way, the optimal pitch angle of the blades can be calculated in advance so that there is little or no delay between aerodynamic forces and the pitch response of the rotor blades. Thus, sudden changes of the momentary wind velocity can be predicted.
By means of the horizontal distance between the upwind-mounted anemometers and the vertical plane of the rotor and the wind velocity, the time delay from when the measurements are made until the effect of the actual measured wind velocity occurs in the rotor can be calculated. The controller unit (not shown) that controls the pitch regulation is given access to all these measurements and can at any given time use this information to optimise the pitch angles of the blades 13. Thus, it is possible to avoid in particular the large rotor axial force reductions which occur on sudden momentary decreases in the momentary wind velocity because the prior art pitch regulation has a time delay.
In the cases where the average velocity is above the nominal wind velocity for the wind power plant 1 and the momentary wind velocity then increases beyond the given average wind velocity, the rotational speed of the rotor 2 according to this method will be increased by means of reduced pitch response compared to the prior art, whilst the generator torque is, optionally simultaneously, reduced in accordance with input from the control unit, which will also help to increase the rotational speed of the rotor 2. Since the rotor axial force in general is increased on increased rpm for a given rotor output, the reduced rotor axial force resulting from the pitch turning of the blades in response to the increased momentary wind velocity can be compensated. The result is that within a small wind velocity increase, both the rotor axial force and the output of the generator can be held almost constant by increasing the rotational speed of the rotor and with optimal pitch angle. At wind increase of about 10%, the rotational speed must according to this method be increased by about 10% to obtain both unchanged rotor axial force and unchanged output to the generator. The pitch angle must be changed at the same time. A similar method is used when there is a decrease in momentary wind velocity, but in that case, the rotational speed of the rotor is decreased whilst the generator torque is, optionally simultaneously, increased in accordance with input from the control unit.
For larger changes in the momentary wind velocity the following is done:
When there is a decrease the momentary wind velocity compared to the average wind velocity measured over a longer period of time than the updating frequency of the pitch regulation, e.g., over a 10 minute period, the pitch angle of the blades is changed less than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged but the output to the generator is slightly less than the nominal output. A 10% decrease in wind velocity gives a reduction in output of about 10% whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged.
Similarly, for a 10% increase in the momentary wind velocity, a smaller change of the pitch angle of the blades will be effected than when pure output-controlled pitch regulation is used. The result of this is that the rotor axial force remains unchanged but the output to the generator is slightly greater than the nominal output. A 10% increase in the momentary wind velocity gives an increase in output of about 10%, whilst the rotor axial force remains unchanged. By combining the two outputs described above, the overall result will be that the momentary wind velocity can vary by typically +/- 20% without the rotor axial force varying. Since the attendant generator output variations will be short-term and fluctuate around the nominal output of the wind power plant or the rated power of the generator, the average generator output will be almost unchanged, i.e., equal to the nominal output (rated power), whilst the axial force for a given average wind velocity can be held constant or almost constant, typically within a +/-20%
variation of the momentary wind velocity.
For a given average wind velocity and rotor rotational speed, the rotor axial force (target value), which corresponds to the nominal output of the generator, can be calculated. Acceptable maximum and minimum values for generator output variations around a mean value can be pre-programmed, and the pitch controller unit will then calculate optimal momentary pitch angles (in response to the momentary wind velocity) so that the rotor axial force is held as constant as possible around said calculated target value whilst the generator output is maintained within the pre-programmed bandwidth.
The calculated target value for rotor axial force will vary with different average wind velocities. Within each average wind velocity, an attempt will then be made to keep the axial force almost constant around this target value using pitch regulation. The average wind velocity may, for example, be the mean of the last 10 minutes. Optionally, pre-calculated values may be used for the target values of the axial force for given average wind velocity intervals, e.g., divided into intervals of 0.1 m/s differences.
For momentary wind velocity variations in excess of about +/- 20% as described above, pitch regulation can be carried out giving priority to not varying the generator output by more than the typical bandwidth of about +/- 10% as described.
On such large variations of the momentary wind velocity, the rotor axial force will start to vary, but also in these cases this variation will be substantially less than for pitch regulation according to the prior art.
Since an average value of the wind velocity over a longer period of time, e.g., 10 minute mean, varies much less over time than the momentary wind velocity variations, the described method will ensure that the rotor axial force variations will be considerably reduced, which will have a positive effect on the fatigue loads on the tower and rotor.
The same method as described above can also be used to actively regulate the rotor axial force around a given mean value. If the rotor axial force is in this way actively controlled with varying value, this can be used, e.g., to apply forces to the tower 1 in counter phase with its motions so that the motions of the tower are dampened. This is particularly advantageous for floating wind power plants.
The control unit will in this case also have access to the motions of the tower. The motions of the tower can, e.g., be recorded using an accelerometer or other suitable measuring method.
Furthermore, the axial force can be used actively in a similar manner to counter any forces that try to turn the rotor out of the wind. This can be done by controlling the individual force of the rotor blades in the wind direction so that any torques that try to turn the rotor and/or the mill housing and/or the tower out of the wind are countered, reduced or eliminated by cyclically changing the individual pitch angle of the blades according to the physical position of each individual blade at any given time, so that the axial force on the rotor is greater on one side or the other of the vertical axis of the rotor as required. When a given rotor blade passes one side of the vertical axis of the tower, the pitch angle is increased, e.g., by 0.5 degrees, and when the same blade passes the opposite side, the pitch angles is decreased correspondingly. Therefore, this does not need to have any effect on the total rotor output or the total rotor axial force. The extra cyclic pitch variation is superposed on the calculated pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the total rotor axial force. This described cyclic pitch regulation can also be used to actively control the rotor 2 so that parts of, or optionally the whole of the wind power plant in the case of a floating plant, can be held in the desired position relative to the wind direction. Thus, it is possible to eliminate or reduce the size or number of motors which according to prior art turn the mill housing 3, or optionally the whole tower 5 in the event the mill housing is non-rotatably mounted on the tower of a floating plant, in the desired position relative to the wind.
Furthermore, the thrust variations in the flap direction (normally approximately the same as the wind direction) on each individual blade (which together constitute the rotor axial force) is reduced by changing the pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the momentary thrust of the blade in the wind direction. The blade can then be controlled individually in relation to its position in its orbit and to directly or indirectly measured values of the wind velocities in different positions in or around the sweeping area of the rotor.
The measured or calculated axial force will be recorded and included in the pitch controller unit for calculation of optimal pitch angle at any given time according to the described method.
Instead of just using measured wind velocity and pitch angle to calculate the rotor axial force, several other direct or indirect methods can be used.
Since the blades 13 are mounted leaning backwards in the pitch bearing 10, i.e., the longitudinal axis 14 of the blade deviates slightly from the pitch bearing shaft axis so that the longitudinal axis 14 of the blades does not intersect the rotor rotational axis 11 and the pitch moment which then occurs can be measured via hydraulic pressure via the blade pitch control system, and the rotor blade thrust in the wind direction for each individual blade can then be calculated; or By using strain gauges on the blades 13 and/or on the main shaft of the rotor and/or on other parts of the wind power plant; or 5 Indirectly by measuring the pitch angles of the blade(s) 13 and the rotor 2 torque directly or by recording other parameters such as the generator torque, output etc.
and then the corresponding rotor axial force of the rotor can be calculated.
By measuring deflection of the blades using a mechanical or electronic measuring system.
10 An embodiment of the method according to the invention is illustrated in Fig. 4 by means of a flow chart. The method is based on the determination in 40 of whether an instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, or optionally output power of the generator is within a range of the nominal value for the wind power plant, in the example, by determining whether the rotor speed or optionally the output power of 15 the generator is within +/- 10% of the nominal value.
If the instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, optionally the output power of the generator, is within the range, an attempt will be made to minimise the rotor axial force variations, optionally the thrust of each blade in the wind direction individually, by regulating towards a target value for the axial force. In 44 it is then determined whether average rotor speed or average generator output power for a given time t, e.g., the last 10 minutes, is above or below the nominal output of the wind power plant. According to this, the target value for the rotor axial force is adjusted in 45, 46. As previously described, a new target value for the axial force can be calculated on the basis of the mean value of the axial force over a given period of time t, for example, of 10 minutes with a given incremental increase or reduction of the target value for axial force depending upon whether it is desired to increase or decrease the average output of the generator. The target value for the rotor axial force may also optionally be a pre-calculated value related to the average wind velocity. The instantaneous value of the rotor axial force is then compared in 47 with the target value for the axial force as achieved in 45/46 and the rotor blade pitch angle is then changed in 48 and 49 in accordance with this comparison.
If, on the other hand, the instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, or optionally the output power of the generator, as calculated in 40 is outside the given range, an attempt is made to come within this range by adjusting the pitch angle in the same way as in the prior art in order to bring the rotor speed, or optionally the average output power of the generator within the desired range, e.g., within +/-10% of the nominal. The pitch angle is adjusted in 42/43 according to the calculation in 41 of whether instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, or optionally output power of the generator, is above or below the desired range. In this way, the pitch angle is adjusted primarily with a view to maintaining a constant rotor axial force regulated towards a slow-varying target value, and unlike the prior art, the pitch angle will only be adjusted to the extent necessary to bring generator output power or rotor speed within the desired range. Thus, there will be a smaller adjustment and smaller rotor axial force variations than with the prior art when regulation is effected towards a constant value for the generator output with attendant large rotor axial force variations.
In the example in Fig. 4, the pitch angle of the rotor blades can be adjusted either for all the rotor blades collectively, or for each individual rotor blade. For systems where it is possible.to adjust each individual. rotor blade, directional.
information for the wind power plant can be taken into account, in addition to the aforementioned moments, with a view to holding the wind power plant in a stable position. This information 50 is taken into account in step 47 in the figure.
Figure 5 illustrates in more detail the steps for providing this directional information.
In step 51 sinus(a) is calculated or recorded, where a is the rotational position of the blade, i.e., it describes where in the rotation each individual rotor blade is. In step 52 it is decided whether the direction error of the wind power plant direction relative to the wind direction is outside a given range, in this case +/-50.
If the direction error is within the range, no action is taken, but if the direction error is outside the range, a rotational mechanism for the tower is optionally triggered and a signal is calculated in 55, 56 according to which side of the range the direction error is on. The information provided in 55 or 56 is superposed on the control signals provided to adjust the pitch angle with respect to the rotor axial force variations, optionally the thrust of each individual blade in the wind direction. The direction error information comprises information about rotational position, i.e., the pitch angle is adjusted individually for each blade according to its momentary rotational position. This means that the thrust of each individual blade in the wind direction is adjusted differently for the different rotational positions so that a force effect is obtained that counters the direction error for the wind power plant.
Furthermore, the thrust variations in the flap direction (normally approximately the same as the wind direction) on each individual blade (which together constitute the rotor axial force) is reduced by changing the pitch angle according to the above-described method in order to control the momentary thrust of the blade in the wind direction. The blade can then be controlled individually in relation to its position in its orbit and to directly or indirectly measured values of the wind velocities in different positions in or around the sweeping area of the rotor.
The measured or calculated axial force will be recorded and included in the pitch controller unit for calculation of optimal pitch angle at any given time according to the described method.
Instead of just using measured wind velocity and pitch angle to calculate the rotor axial force, several other direct or indirect methods can be used.
Since the blades 13 are mounted leaning backwards in the pitch bearing 10, i.e., the longitudinal axis 14 of the blade deviates slightly from the pitch bearing shaft axis so that the longitudinal axis 14 of the blades does not intersect the rotor rotational axis 11 and the pitch moment which then occurs can be measured via hydraulic pressure via the blade pitch control system, and the rotor blade thrust in the wind direction for each individual blade can then be calculated; or By using strain gauges on the blades 13 and/or on the main shaft of the rotor and/or on other parts of the wind power plant; or 5 Indirectly by measuring the pitch angles of the blade(s) 13 and the rotor 2 torque directly or by recording other parameters such as the generator torque, output etc.
and then the corresponding rotor axial force of the rotor can be calculated.
By measuring deflection of the blades using a mechanical or electronic measuring system.
10 An embodiment of the method according to the invention is illustrated in Fig. 4 by means of a flow chart. The method is based on the determination in 40 of whether an instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, or optionally output power of the generator is within a range of the nominal value for the wind power plant, in the example, by determining whether the rotor speed or optionally the output power of 15 the generator is within +/- 10% of the nominal value.
If the instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, optionally the output power of the generator, is within the range, an attempt will be made to minimise the rotor axial force variations, optionally the thrust of each blade in the wind direction individually, by regulating towards a target value for the axial force. In 44 it is then determined whether average rotor speed or average generator output power for a given time t, e.g., the last 10 minutes, is above or below the nominal output of the wind power plant. According to this, the target value for the rotor axial force is adjusted in 45, 46. As previously described, a new target value for the axial force can be calculated on the basis of the mean value of the axial force over a given period of time t, for example, of 10 minutes with a given incremental increase or reduction of the target value for axial force depending upon whether it is desired to increase or decrease the average output of the generator. The target value for the rotor axial force may also optionally be a pre-calculated value related to the average wind velocity. The instantaneous value of the rotor axial force is then compared in 47 with the target value for the axial force as achieved in 45/46 and the rotor blade pitch angle is then changed in 48 and 49 in accordance with this comparison.
If, on the other hand, the instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, or optionally the output power of the generator, as calculated in 40 is outside the given range, an attempt is made to come within this range by adjusting the pitch angle in the same way as in the prior art in order to bring the rotor speed, or optionally the average output power of the generator within the desired range, e.g., within +/-10% of the nominal. The pitch angle is adjusted in 42/43 according to the calculation in 41 of whether instantaneous/momentary rotor speed, or optionally output power of the generator, is above or below the desired range. In this way, the pitch angle is adjusted primarily with a view to maintaining a constant rotor axial force regulated towards a slow-varying target value, and unlike the prior art, the pitch angle will only be adjusted to the extent necessary to bring generator output power or rotor speed within the desired range. Thus, there will be a smaller adjustment and smaller rotor axial force variations than with the prior art when regulation is effected towards a constant value for the generator output with attendant large rotor axial force variations.
In the example in Fig. 4, the pitch angle of the rotor blades can be adjusted either for all the rotor blades collectively, or for each individual rotor blade. For systems where it is possible.to adjust each individual. rotor blade, directional.
information for the wind power plant can be taken into account, in addition to the aforementioned moments, with a view to holding the wind power plant in a stable position. This information 50 is taken into account in step 47 in the figure.
Figure 5 illustrates in more detail the steps for providing this directional information.
In step 51 sinus(a) is calculated or recorded, where a is the rotational position of the blade, i.e., it describes where in the rotation each individual rotor blade is. In step 52 it is decided whether the direction error of the wind power plant direction relative to the wind direction is outside a given range, in this case +/-50.
If the direction error is within the range, no action is taken, but if the direction error is outside the range, a rotational mechanism for the tower is optionally triggered and a signal is calculated in 55, 56 according to which side of the range the direction error is on. The information provided in 55 or 56 is superposed on the control signals provided to adjust the pitch angle with respect to the rotor axial force variations, optionally the thrust of each individual blade in the wind direction. The direction error information comprises information about rotational position, i.e., the pitch angle is adjusted individually for each blade according to its momentary rotational position. This means that the thrust of each individual blade in the wind direction is adjusted differently for the different rotational positions so that a force effect is obtained that counters the direction error for the wind power plant.
Claims (12)
1. A method for controlling the output of a wind power plant comprising a converter unit, the method comprising establishing an output power range for the converter unit, measuring the output power of the converter unit, and if the output power of the converter unit is within said range, changing the pitch angle of the rotor blades in order to minimise variations in the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction individually or collectively, and if the output power of the converter is outside this range, changing the pitch angle of the rotor blade in order to bringing the power output within the range.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the step of minimising variations in the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is done by regulating towards a calculated target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction, the target value for the thrust in the wind direction being different for different average wind velocities.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is adjusted in relation to average converter unit output or rotor speed over a given period of time.
4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the target value for the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is predefined and related to given average wind velocities.
5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is in addition adjusted by changing the rotor rpm by adjusting the generator rotation resistance moment and/or rotor brakes.
6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the momentary thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction can be determined directly or indirectly by means of strain gauges, wind velocity measurements, by measuring geometric deflection of the blades, measuring the generator torque and/or measuring the generator output together with simultaneous measurement of the pitch angles of the blade or blades, and/or by measuring or using the pitch moment of the blades about the rotational axis of the pitch bearing either by mounting the blades leaning backwards in the pitch bearing, by shaping the blades so that the impact point on the blade is behind the rotational axis of the pitch bearing in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor.
7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the pitch angle of the rotor blades is in addition changed with respect to minimising direction errors for the wind power plant.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the direction error is corrected if it is outside a given range.
9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the pitch angle of the rotor blades is adjusted differently for different rotational positions.
10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the pitch angles of the rotor blades are adjusted individually and/or independent of each other.
11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the wind field in a plane that is substantially perpendicular to the wind direction is predicted by using directly or indirectly measured values of the wind forces acting on the rotor blade or blades that is/are at the front in relation to the rotational direction of the rotor.
12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the thrust of the rotor blades in the wind direction is used actively to counter motions of the wind power plant tower by regulating the pitch angles of the rotor blades.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NO20041208A NO20041208L (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2004-03-22 | Procedure for reducing axial power variations for rotor and directional control for wind power with active pitch control |
NO20041208 | 2004-03-22 | ||
PCT/NO2005/000096 WO2005090781A1 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-03-18 | A method for reduction of axial power variations of a wind power plant |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2564635A1 CA2564635A1 (en) | 2005-09-29 |
CA2564635C true CA2564635C (en) | 2012-12-11 |
Family
ID=34859221
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2564635A Expired - Fee Related CA2564635C (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-03-18 | A method for reduction of axial power variations of a wind power plant |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070212209A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1738073A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5006186B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101145255B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005224580B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2564635C (en) |
NO (2) | NO20041208L (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005090781A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8197179B2 (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2012-06-12 | Douglas Spriggs Selsam | Stationary co-axial multi-rotor wind turbine supported by continuous central driveshaft |
NO20054704D0 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2005-10-13 | Sway As | Method and method for wind turbines and propulsion systems with magnetically stable main bearing and load control system |
NO325856B1 (en) * | 2005-11-01 | 2008-08-04 | Hywind As | Method for damping unstable free rigid body oscillations in a floating wind turbine installation |
DK176552B1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2008-08-04 | Lm Glasfiber As | Variable speed nav |
JP4814644B2 (en) | 2006-02-01 | 2011-11-16 | 富士重工業株式会社 | Wind power generator |
ES2414093T3 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2013-07-18 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | A procedure and control system for the reduction of fatigue loads on the components of a wind turbine subjected to an asymmetric load of the rotor plane |
GB2442719A (en) | 2006-10-10 | 2008-04-16 | Iti Scotland Ltd | Wave and wind power generation system |
EP2097642B1 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2013-08-21 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | A method for damping edgewise oscillations in one or more blades of a wind turbine, an active stall controlled wind turbine and use hereof |
BE1017458A3 (en) * | 2007-02-06 | 2008-10-07 | Hansen Transmissions Int | WIND TURBINE. |
EP2132437B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2018-10-03 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Wind turbine with pitch control |
CN101730796B (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2012-09-19 | 维斯塔斯风力系统有限公司 | A method of operating a wind turbine with pitch control, a wind turbine and a cluster of wind turbines |
JP4994947B2 (en) * | 2007-05-21 | 2012-08-08 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Wind power generator and yaw rotation drive method for wind power generator |
WO2009033484A2 (en) * | 2007-09-13 | 2009-03-19 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | A method of controlling a wind turbine, a wind turbine and use of a method |
WO2009040442A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | Method for enhancing recovery of a hydrocarbon fluid |
US7612462B2 (en) * | 2007-10-08 | 2009-11-03 | Viterna Larry A | Floating wind turbine system |
DE102007063082B4 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2010-12-09 | Repower Systems Ag | Method for operating a wind energy plant |
EP2148225B1 (en) * | 2008-07-22 | 2016-11-02 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and arrangement for the forecast of wind-resources |
JP5199828B2 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2013-05-15 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Wind power generator and control method thereof |
GB0907132D0 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2009-06-03 | Statoilhydro Asa | Wave energy extraction |
KR101375768B1 (en) * | 2009-09-01 | 2014-03-18 | 현대중공업 주식회사 | The Wind turbine individual blade pitch controlling method and controlling system |
JP5318740B2 (en) * | 2009-12-11 | 2013-10-16 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Offshore windmill |
GB2479415A (en) | 2010-04-09 | 2011-10-12 | Vestas Wind Sys As | Wind Turbine Independent Blade Control Outside The Rated Output |
GB2479413A (en) | 2010-04-09 | 2011-10-12 | Vestas Wind Sys As | Wind Turbine Independent Blade Control Outside The Rated Output |
FR2966175B1 (en) * | 2010-10-18 | 2012-12-21 | Doris Engineering | DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING A WIND TURBINE FOR PRODUCING ELECTRIC ENERGY AT SEA, INSTALLATION FOR PRODUCING CORRESPONDING ELECTRIC ENERGY IN SEA. |
EP2489872B1 (en) * | 2011-02-15 | 2013-03-20 | SSB Wind Systems GmbH & Co. KG | Blade load reduction for wind turbine |
BRPI1100050A2 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2016-05-03 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | "Blade Tilt Control System, Wind Turbine Generator, and Blade Tilt Control Method". |
DE102012110466A1 (en) * | 2012-10-31 | 2014-04-30 | 2-B Energy B.V. | Method for operating a wind turbine, wind turbine and control device for a wind turbine |
JP6025869B2 (en) * | 2012-12-19 | 2016-11-16 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Windmill and its driving method |
GB201223088D0 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2013-02-06 | Statoil Asa | Controlling motions of floating wind turbines |
CN107503885B (en) * | 2012-12-26 | 2019-06-07 | 菱重维斯塔斯海上风力有限公司 | The control device and control method of float type wind power generation plant |
US10024303B2 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2018-07-17 | Mhi Vestas Offshore Wind A/S | Method and device for controlling floating body wind turbine power generating apparatus, and floating body wind turbine power generating apparatus |
DK177730B1 (en) * | 2013-01-15 | 2014-05-05 | Envision Energy Denmark Aps | Partial pitch wind turbine with floating foundation |
KR101540329B1 (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2015-07-30 | 삼성중공업 주식회사 | Wind power generator and method of controlling thereof |
DE102015209109A1 (en) * | 2015-05-19 | 2016-11-24 | Wobben Properties Gmbh | Measuring arrangement on a wind turbine |
NL2015992B1 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2017-07-13 | Univ Groningen | Biomimetic wind turbine design with lift-enhancing periodic stall. |
US11149711B2 (en) | 2015-12-23 | 2021-10-19 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Control method for a wind turbine |
US10539116B2 (en) | 2016-07-13 | 2020-01-21 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods to correct induction for LIDAR-assisted wind turbine control |
EP3324043A1 (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2018-05-23 | LM WP Patent Holding A/S | Method for controlling a floating offshore wind turbine, wind turbine control system and floating offshore wind turbine |
US20220307472A1 (en) * | 2019-05-09 | 2022-09-29 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Wind turbine control using predicted steady-state deflection |
CN111271224B (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2020-09-29 | 杭州沃门峡电子科技有限公司 | Wind power generation tower convenient to maintain |
CN115680902B (en) * | 2022-10-13 | 2024-05-03 | 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 | Method for adjusting axial force of aero-engine rotor |
Family Cites Families (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2655026C2 (en) * | 1976-12-04 | 1979-01-18 | Ulrich Prof. Dr.-Ing. 7312 Kirchheim Huetter | Wind energy converter |
US4297076A (en) | 1979-06-08 | 1981-10-27 | Lockheed Corporation | Wind turbine |
US4339666A (en) * | 1980-12-24 | 1982-07-13 | United Technologies Corporation | Blade pitch angle control for a wind turbine generator |
US4410806A (en) * | 1981-09-03 | 1983-10-18 | Brulle Robert V | Control system for a vertical axis windmill |
US4420692A (en) * | 1982-04-02 | 1983-12-13 | United Technologies Corporation | Motion responsive wind turbine tower damping |
US4435647A (en) * | 1982-04-02 | 1984-03-06 | United Technologies Corporation | Predicted motion wind turbine tower damping |
US4515525A (en) * | 1982-11-08 | 1985-05-07 | United Technologies Corporation | Minimization of the effects of yaw oscillations in wind turbines |
US4656362A (en) * | 1982-11-08 | 1987-04-07 | United Technologies Corporation | Blade pitch angle control for large wind turbines |
JPS59183085A (en) * | 1983-04-01 | 1984-10-18 | Yamaha Motor Co Ltd | Windmill equipped with rotating speed control device for rotor |
US4584486A (en) * | 1984-04-09 | 1986-04-22 | The Boeing Company | Blade pitch control of a wind turbine |
US5178518A (en) * | 1990-05-14 | 1993-01-12 | Carter Sr J Warne | Free-yaw, free-pitch wind-driven electric generator apparatus |
US5584655A (en) * | 1994-12-21 | 1996-12-17 | The Wind Turbine Company | Rotor device and control for wind turbine |
DE19628073C1 (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 1997-09-18 | Aerodyn Energiesysteme Gmbh | Wind-powered generation plant rotor blade angle correction method |
JPH1150945A (en) * | 1997-08-04 | 1999-02-23 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Method for controlling power generating amount of wind power generator |
US6327957B1 (en) * | 1998-01-09 | 2001-12-11 | Wind Eagle Joint Venture | Wind-driven electric generator apparatus of the downwind type with flexible changeable-pitch blades |
AU2046499A (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 1999-08-02 | Dancontrol Engineering A/S | Method for measuring and controlling oscillations in a wind turbine |
WO2000009885A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-24 | Neg Micon A/S | A method and a device for adjusting the pitch and stopping the rotation of the blades of a wind turbine |
ES2228121T3 (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2005-04-01 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | PROCEDURE FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF AN ELECTRIC TURBINE AND ELECTRIC TURBINE FOR USE IN THIS PROCEDURE. |
EP1126163A1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2001-08-22 | Turbowinds N.V./S.A. | Blade pitch angle control device for wind turbine |
DE10016912C1 (en) * | 2000-04-05 | 2001-12-13 | Aerodyn Eng Gmbh | Operation of offshore wind turbines dependent on the natural frequency of the tower |
WO2004074681A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2004-09-02 | Forskningscenter Risø | Method of controlling aerodynamic load of a wind turbine based on local blade flow measurement |
US7121795B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-10-17 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for reducing rotor blade deflections, loads, and/or peak rotational speed |
DE102005048805A1 (en) * | 2005-10-10 | 2007-04-12 | Daubner & Stommel GbR Bau-Werk-Planung (vertretungsberechtigter Gesellschafter: Matthias Stommel, 27777 Ganderkesee) | Method for operating a wind energy plant |
DE102005059888C5 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2016-03-10 | Nordex Energy Gmbh | Method for torque and pitch control for a wind turbine depending on the speed |
-
2004
- 2004-03-22 NO NO20041208A patent/NO20041208L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2005
- 2005-03-18 US US10/599,109 patent/US20070212209A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-03-18 KR KR1020067020476A patent/KR101145255B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-03-18 AU AU2005224580A patent/AU2005224580B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-03-18 EP EP05731806A patent/EP1738073A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-03-18 CA CA2564635A patent/CA2564635C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-03-18 JP JP2007504903A patent/JP5006186B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-03-18 WO PCT/NO2005/000096 patent/WO2005090781A1/en active Application Filing
-
2006
- 2006-10-23 NO NO20064791A patent/NO342746B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP5006186B2 (en) | 2012-08-22 |
AU2005224580B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 |
US20070212209A1 (en) | 2007-09-13 |
KR20070002038A (en) | 2007-01-04 |
NO20064791L (en) | 2006-12-21 |
NO20041208D0 (en) | 2004-03-22 |
JP2007530856A (en) | 2007-11-01 |
EP1738073A1 (en) | 2007-01-03 |
WO2005090781A1 (en) | 2005-09-29 |
CA2564635A1 (en) | 2005-09-29 |
NO342746B1 (en) | 2018-08-06 |
NO20041208L (en) | 2005-09-23 |
KR101145255B1 (en) | 2012-06-01 |
AU2005224580A1 (en) | 2005-09-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2564635C (en) | A method for reduction of axial power variations of a wind power plant | |
US7351033B2 (en) | Wind turbine load control method | |
EP2306007B1 (en) | Method and system for controlling a wind turbine | |
US9372201B2 (en) | Yaw and pitch angles | |
KR101634727B1 (en) | Method for controlling a wind power plant | |
US6441507B1 (en) | Rotor pitch control method and apparatus for parking wind turbine | |
US9523352B2 (en) | Methods and systems for alleviating the loads generated in wind turbines by wind asymmetries | |
EP2489872B1 (en) | Blade load reduction for wind turbine | |
EP1907695B8 (en) | Wind flow estimation and tracking using tower dynamics | |
US20090079192A1 (en) | Method for controlling and adjusting a wind turbine | |
US20100014969A1 (en) | Wind turbine with blade pitch control to compensate for wind shear and wind misalignment | |
US20140030090A1 (en) | Systems and methods for controlling tower clearance in a wind turbine | |
EP2754890B1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Controlling an Operational Parameter of a Wind Turbine | |
EP1442216A1 (en) | Rotor with extendable blades and control criteria therefor | |
KR102018579B1 (en) | Pitch controller of control system of Wind turbine | |
TW201447103A (en) | Wind turbine and method of operating a wind turbine | |
JP6997049B2 (en) | Wind power generators and their control methods | |
WO2023078521A1 (en) | A method for reducing blade flap loads in a wind turbine | |
KR20240013755A (en) | Single-point-mooring wind turbine having two wind energy conversion units each with a rotor | |
ES2829201T3 (en) | Wind turbine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20160318 |