CA2248080A1 - A cleaning formulation for equipment used in the food industry, its use and a process for cleaning such equipment - Google Patents
A cleaning formulation for equipment used in the food industry, its use and a process for cleaning such equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2248080A1 CA2248080A1 CA002248080A CA2248080A CA2248080A1 CA 2248080 A1 CA2248080 A1 CA 2248080A1 CA 002248080 A CA002248080 A CA 002248080A CA 2248080 A CA2248080 A CA 2248080A CA 2248080 A1 CA2248080 A1 CA 2248080A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- cleaning
- hydroxide
- cleaning formulation
- edta
- formulation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 115
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 title claims description 45
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 title claims description 7
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 72
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-] XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000005374 membrane filtration Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 30
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000012466 permeate Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000001728 nano-filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000006052 feed supplement Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium hydroxide Substances [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 8
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 159000000001 potassium salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003995 emulsifying agent Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- XAEFZNCEHLXOMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium benzoate Chemical compound [K+].[O-]C(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 XAEFZNCEHLXOMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 3
- OCUCCJIRFHNWBP-IYEMJOQQSA-L Copper gluconate Chemical class [Cu+2].OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C([O-])=O.OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C([O-])=O OCUCCJIRFHNWBP-IYEMJOQQSA-L 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000008044 alkali metal hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910001413 alkali metal ion Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000021317 phosphate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000003013 phosphoric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011118 potassium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 claims 11
- 235000011121 sodium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 claims 3
- 229910001854 alkali hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 150000004679 hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 abstract 3
- 239000012459 cleaning agent Substances 0.000 abstract 2
- 229940072033 potash Drugs 0.000 description 27
- BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium carbonate Substances [K+].[K+].[O-]C([O-])=O BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 27
- 235000015320 potassium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 27
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 16
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000011026 diafiltration Methods 0.000 description 7
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 4
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001172 regenerating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003623 enhancer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000020477 pH reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001415 sodium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 159000000000 sodium salts Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 235000019832 sodium triphosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- UNXRWKVEANCORM-UHFFFAOYSA-I triphosphate(5-) Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])(=O)OP([O-])(=O)OP([O-])([O-])=O UNXRWKVEANCORM-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 description 2
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-gluconic acid Natural products OCC(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)=O RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QXNVGIXVLWOKEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Disodium Chemical class [Na][Na] QXNVGIXVLWOKEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZGTMUACCHSMWAC-UHFFFAOYSA-L EDTA disodium salt (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].OC(=O)CN(CC([O-])=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC([O-])=O ZGTMUACCHSMWAC-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-SQOUGZDYSA-N Gluconic acid Natural products OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C(O)=O RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-SQOUGZDYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FKNQFGJONOIPTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium cation Chemical compound [Na+] FKNQFGJONOIPTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000008139 complexing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000009295 crossflow filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002425 crystallisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008025 crystallization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000249 desinfective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000174 gluconic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012208 gluconic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 159000000003 magnesium salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021049 nutrient content Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001414 potassium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/02—Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
- C11D3/04—Water-soluble compounds
- C11D3/044—Hydroxides or bases
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
- C11D17/0047—Detergents in the form of bars or tablets
- C11D17/0056—Lavatory cleansing blocks
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/20—Organic compounds containing oxygen
- C11D3/2075—Carboxylic acids-salts thereof
- C11D3/2086—Hydroxy carboxylic acids-salts thereof
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D7/00—Compositions of detergents based essentially on non-surface-active compounds
- C11D7/02—Inorganic compounds
- C11D7/04—Water-soluble compounds
- C11D7/06—Hydroxides
-
- C11D2111/20—
Abstract
The aqueous alkaline cleaning agent proposed contains, as its hydroxide constituent, only potassium hydroxide or a mixture of potassium hydroxide and another alkali, the potassium hydroxide content being at least 20 % by wt., calculated as hydroxide, relative to the total amount of hydroxide present in the agent. The agent proposed enables cleaning to be carried out much more economically than with prior art agents. The method according to the invention includes regeneration of the cleaning agent by means of membrane filtration.
Description
A Cleaning Formulation for Equipment Used in the Food Industry, its Use and a Process for Cleaning Such Equipment This invention relates to a water-containing alkaline cleaning formulation containing potash Iye for equipment used in the food industry.
The invention also relates to a process for cleaning equipment used in the food industry with an alkaline cleaning formulation which is regenerated by membrane filtration, the permeate being recycled.
It is known that equipment used in the food-processing industry, for example tanks, pipelines, bottling plants and the like, can be cleaned with alkaline cleaning solutions. These cleaning solutions or liquors essentially consist of a 2% soda Iye containing added cleaning enhancers, for example defoamers and emulsifiers. In principle, potash Iye could be used instead of soda Iye because it produces the same cleaning result. However, soda Iye is used for reasons of cost. Only where low outside temperatures prevail is potash Iye added in small quantities to the soda Iye in order to lower the crystallization point of the cleaning concentrate. However, the potash Iye always makes up considerably less than 20% by weight of the hydroxide total.
The alkaline cleaning solutions often contain an addition of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the form of its disodium salt because EDTA- as the only complexing agent in aqueous alkaline cleaning solutions - is capable of dissolving mineral soils, such as calcium and magnesium salts, for example in the form of limescale, milk scale, beer scale and the like.
In recent years, an integrated cleaning and disinfecting technique known as cleaning in place (CIP) has been successfully applied. The corresponding fully automatic cleaning systems clean all storage tanks and pipelines automatically after each production cycle. The cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention are particularly suitable for use in the CIP process.
It is known that wastewater pollution by spent cleaning solutions can be reduced and the economy of the cleaning process improved by regenerating the spent cleaning solution in membrane filtration units. To this end, part of the cleaning solution is transferred from a collecting tank to a buffer tank and pump-circulated from there through a membrane system in which it undergoes crossflow filtration. One such regenerating process is known from WO 95/27681 A1. The permeate consisting of water and soda Iye is returned to the collecting tank for the cleaning solution. The organic soils collect in the buffer tank of the membrane filtration unit and are periodically removed for disposal as waste. Since, in cases where EDTA-containing cleaning solutions are used, any introduction of EDTA into the wastewatershould be avoided on account of the poor biodegradabilityof this compound and its ability to remobilize heavy metals in the environment, Israeli patent application IS 109 249 proposes recovering the EDTA from the concentrates collecting in the buffer tank by acidic precipitation. However,the addition of EDTA to the cleaning solutions affects the performance of the nanofiltration unit which is reflected in distinctly reduced flow. In addition, in the case of cleaning equipment for the dairy industry and in the case of EDTA-free cleaning solutions, it is known that the concentrate can be freed from the alkaline constituents by diafiltration and subsequently used as an animal feed or animal feed supplement. Diafiltration is necessary to reduce the sodium content of the concentrate which is too high for its use as an animal feed. Unfortunately, the large volume of wastewater accumulating in the diafiltration process and the high cost of diafiltration are disadvantages.
The problem addressed by the present invention was to provide an alkaline cleaning formulation and a process for cleaning equipment used in the food industry of the type mentioned at the beginning which would enable cleaning to be carried out far more economically than in the prior art.
In the case of the water-containing alkaline cleaning formulation, the solution to this problem as provided by the invention is characterized in that the cleaning formulation contains only potash Iye or a mixture of potash Iye and another alkali, more particularly soda Iye, containing at least 20% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation, as its hydroxide component.
In the case of the cleaning process according to the invention, the solution to the problem stated above as provided by the invention is characterized in that it is carried out with a cleaning solution of which the hydroxide component consists solely of potash Iye or of a mixture of potash Iye and another alkali, more particularly soda Iye, containing at least 20% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning solution.
It has surprisingly been found that the partial or complete replacement of sodium hydroxide by potassium hydroxide increases the performance of the membrane unit by at least 10 to 50%. Performance in this case is based on the permeate flows achieved. Investment costs and the energy consumption of the membrane filtration unit can thus be reduced. Higher concentrations of the soil load removed are possible so that the volume of the soil load is reduced and the yield of regenerated solution is increased.
Another advantage was discovered. In contrast to the prior art where the concentrate obtained is a mass which is fairly solid at room temperature and which leads to problems during discharge from the buffer tank and during subsequent processing, the concentrate obtained where the cleaning formulation according to the invention is used and in the practical application of the process according to the invention is a mass containing the soils which is liquid at room temperature and even at a temperature of 0~C. On the one hand, this simplifies the waste logistics; on the other hand, greater concentration can be achieved, providing for a higher nutrient content where the concentrate is used as an animal feed and for a higher energy content where it is used as a fuel.
The advantages mentioned above were achieved with a minimum of only 20% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation. The disadvantage of the higher cost of using potash Iye instead of soda Iye is negligible because the potash Iye is largely regenerated.
In the nanofiltration of EDTA-containing cleaning solutions, the performance of the membrane filtration unit is likewise increased by replacement of the sodium salts by potassium salts. Disadvantages arising during filtration through the use of EDTA can thus be compensated or even overcompensated simply by using potash Iye and EDTA in the form of the free acid or its potassium salt. The disodium salt of EDTA may also be used providing this does not increase the sodium ion content of the formulation beyond certain limits. If all alkali metal ions are counted as alkali metal hydroxide, the potash Iye content of the cleaning formulation, based on the total amount of hydroxide present therein, should not fall below 20% by weight. Generally speaking, the performance of the filtration unit increases with the ratio of potassium to sodium ions in the cleaning formulation, i.e.
sodium-free cleaning solutions produce the highest throughflow rates in l/m2h.
The cleaning formulation preferably contains a mixture of potash Iye and another alkali, preferably soda Iye, containing at least 50% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation.
The advantage of the EDTA-free cleaning formulation containing at least 50% by weight of potash Iye lies in the possibility of directly using the soils filtered off without any aftertreatment as an animal feed, for example as a pig feed, because a high potassium salt content can be tolerated more readily than a high sodium salt content.
In one particularly preferred embodiment, the EDTA-free cleaning formulation contains potash Iye alone as its hydroxide component. By virtue of its high content of potassium ions, the membrane filtration concentrate obtained in this case is a valuable animal feed supplement, particularly for pigfeed.
Where the soils removed are to be used as an animal feed, it is also of advantage for the cleaning formulation to contain additives which are all suitable as animal feed supplements. Special physiologically safe cleaning enhancers of the type in question, which are not used in known cleaning formulations, include in particular phosphates, gluconates and/or approved food-quality defoamers and emulsifiers.
In another advantageous embodiment, the cleaning formulation contains additives present in the form of potassium salts in addition to the hydroxide components. On the one hand, the performance of the membrane filtration unit can be additionally increased in this case. A permeate flow of, for example, 50 I/m2h in the case of a conventional cleaning formulation based on soda Iye can be increased to 70 I/m2h by replacing the soda Iye with potash Iye. If the cleaning formulation additionally contains potassium tripolyphosphate to enhance cleaning, the permeate flow additionally rises to 74 I/m2h.
Another advantage of these additives present in the form of potassium salts is their particular suitability as an animal feed supplement.
As mentioned above, the cleaning formulation according to the invention may be used with advantage for food-processing equipment having a regeneration unit for spent cleaning solutions. The cleaning formulation is particularly preferred for cleaning dairy equipment because the concentrate obtained may be used without any further aftertreatment as an animal feed.
There is generally no need for diafiltration or other additional working-up. Notonly is there no need for expensive waste-disposal of the soils separated off, these "soils" actually constitute a new useful material. If, however, the high salt content is to be reduced by diafiltration, the filtration process may be carried out much more quickly and hence economically in the case of the cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention.
The concentrates obtained in the nanofiltration of EDTA-containing cleaning solutions can be subjected to step-by-step acidification to recover the EDTA. If the concentrate is nonspecifically acidified (as described in Israeli patent application IS 109 249), almost all the dirt present in the concentrate is precipitated besides the EDTA. When the precipitated EDTA
filtered off is redissolved with a Iye, the dirt is also redissolved. If the resulting solution is added to the solution cleaned by nanofiltration, the degree of soiling prevailing before nanofiltration is virtually reestablished. By acidification in steps (fractional precipitation), most of the dirt can be precipitated before the precipitation point for EDTA. The precipitated dirt can then be removed by simple filtration. If the pH value of the filtered solution is further reduced, EDTA precipitates with a far lower content of residual soil.
The EDTA filtered off can be reconverted into a soluble form with alkali and added, for example, to the nanofiltration permeate. Since EDTA remains to a certain extent both in the precipitated sludge and in the solution from which it was precipitated, 80 to 90% of the EDTA originally used can be recycled by this method. However, the dirt filtered off can no longer be used as an animal feed on account of its residual EDTA content.
Alkali-resistant nanofiltration membranes with a D value of 100 to 2,000 dalton are preferably used in the process according to the invention to regenerate the cleaning solution. Membranes such as these are permeable to molecules with a molecularweight up to the D value mentioned, but retain molecules with a higher molecular weight.
In one particular embodiment, the membrane filtration is carried out on the crossflow principle with a transmembranal pressure difference of 8 to 25 bar.
In another preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, a cleaning solution containing only additives suitable as animal feedsupplements besides the hydroxide components is used for cleaning dairy equipment and the membrane filtration concentrate obtained is used as an animal feed or animal feed supplement.
A concentrate with a particularly high potassium content is far more suitable for use as an animal feed, for example as a pig feed, than concentrates with high sodium contents. In another embodiment, therefore, the hydroxide components of the cleaning solution consist solely of potash Iye.
The known cleaning process is described first in the following with reference to the accompanying drawing which is a simplified flow chart of a CIP cleaning system followed by a regeneration unit for the cleaning solution.
The description of the known process is followed by some Examples which demonstrate the superiority of the process and cleaning formulation according to the invention to the prior art.
From a collecting tank 1 for the cleaning solution with a volume of 5 to 30 m3, the solution which contains about 2% by weight of soda Iye in the prior art and 2% by weight of potash Iye according to the invention and which is heated to 60-70~C is fed to the equipment (tanks, pipelines, etc. denoted by the reference numeral 2 in Fig. 1) to be cleaned. The cleaning solution is circulated.
The soils gradually collecting in the cleaning solution are removed in the regenerating section shown on the right of Fig. 1. To this end, part of the cleaning solution is transferred to the buffer tank 4 through a pipe 3. This part of the cleaning solution is circulated through a membrane module 6 by a pressure pump 5. The soils collecting and settling in the buffer tank 4 are periodically removed through a pipe 7. The permeate issuing from the membrane module is returned to the collecting tank 1through the return pipe 8.
Example 1 (Comparison Example) An artificially soiled solution corresponding to practical conditions with a temperature of 60 to 65~C was used. It had been passed through a single-tube module with a membrane area of 0.042 m2 and an MPT 34 nanofiltration membrane (a product of Membrane Products) for 75 to 120 mins. at a throughput of 1000 I/h (entry pressure 18 bar, exit pressure 14 bar). The permeate side of the membrane was at atmospheric pressure.
In the case of a cleaning solution containing only 2% soda Iye, the permeate flow was 50 I/h m2.
Where a cleaning solution containing only 2% potash Iye was used, the permeate flow increased to 701/h m2.
When 0.1% by weight of gluconic acid was added to the cleaning solution containing the potash Iye, a permeate flow of 651/h m2 was observed.
When 0.25% by weight of potassium tripolyphosphate was added to the cleaning solution containing potash Iye, a permeate flow of 73 to 75 I/h m2 was observed.
These results reflect the clear superiority of the cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention over the prior art because far higher performances were achieved. An additional advantage lies in the low sodium content of the concentrate obtained so that the concentrate may readily be used without further aftertreatment as an animal feed. In particular,there is no need for expensive diafiltration which is necessary in the known process in order to reduce the sodium content to tolerable levels.
Example 2 An artificially soiled solution corresponding to practical conditions with a temperature of 60 to 65~C and an EDTA content of 0.7% by weight was used. It had been passed through a single-tube module with a membrane area of 0.042 m2 and an MPT 34 nanofiltration membrane (a product of Membrane Products) for 180 mins. at a throughput of 10001/h (entry pressure 18 bar, exit pressure 14 bar). The permeate side of the membrane was at atmospheric pressure.
In the case of a cleaning solution containing only 2% soda Iye, the .. ~ . .
permeate flow was 50 I/h m2.
When 0.7% by weight of EDTA was added to the cleaning solution containing the soda Iye, a permeate flow of only 30 I/h m2 was observed.
Where a cleaning solution containing only 2% potash Iye was used, the permeate flow increased to 70 I/h m2.
When 0.7% by weight of EDTA was added to the cleaning solution containing the potash Iye, a permeate flow of 60 I/h m2 was observed, i.e. a 20% improvement over the EDTA-free cleaning solution containing soda Iye.
These results reflect the clear superiority of the cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention over the prior art because far higher performances were achieved and were not as badly affected by the addition of EDTA as the known cleaning formulations and cleaning processes.
The invention also relates to a process for cleaning equipment used in the food industry with an alkaline cleaning formulation which is regenerated by membrane filtration, the permeate being recycled.
It is known that equipment used in the food-processing industry, for example tanks, pipelines, bottling plants and the like, can be cleaned with alkaline cleaning solutions. These cleaning solutions or liquors essentially consist of a 2% soda Iye containing added cleaning enhancers, for example defoamers and emulsifiers. In principle, potash Iye could be used instead of soda Iye because it produces the same cleaning result. However, soda Iye is used for reasons of cost. Only where low outside temperatures prevail is potash Iye added in small quantities to the soda Iye in order to lower the crystallization point of the cleaning concentrate. However, the potash Iye always makes up considerably less than 20% by weight of the hydroxide total.
The alkaline cleaning solutions often contain an addition of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the form of its disodium salt because EDTA- as the only complexing agent in aqueous alkaline cleaning solutions - is capable of dissolving mineral soils, such as calcium and magnesium salts, for example in the form of limescale, milk scale, beer scale and the like.
In recent years, an integrated cleaning and disinfecting technique known as cleaning in place (CIP) has been successfully applied. The corresponding fully automatic cleaning systems clean all storage tanks and pipelines automatically after each production cycle. The cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention are particularly suitable for use in the CIP process.
It is known that wastewater pollution by spent cleaning solutions can be reduced and the economy of the cleaning process improved by regenerating the spent cleaning solution in membrane filtration units. To this end, part of the cleaning solution is transferred from a collecting tank to a buffer tank and pump-circulated from there through a membrane system in which it undergoes crossflow filtration. One such regenerating process is known from WO 95/27681 A1. The permeate consisting of water and soda Iye is returned to the collecting tank for the cleaning solution. The organic soils collect in the buffer tank of the membrane filtration unit and are periodically removed for disposal as waste. Since, in cases where EDTA-containing cleaning solutions are used, any introduction of EDTA into the wastewatershould be avoided on account of the poor biodegradabilityof this compound and its ability to remobilize heavy metals in the environment, Israeli patent application IS 109 249 proposes recovering the EDTA from the concentrates collecting in the buffer tank by acidic precipitation. However,the addition of EDTA to the cleaning solutions affects the performance of the nanofiltration unit which is reflected in distinctly reduced flow. In addition, in the case of cleaning equipment for the dairy industry and in the case of EDTA-free cleaning solutions, it is known that the concentrate can be freed from the alkaline constituents by diafiltration and subsequently used as an animal feed or animal feed supplement. Diafiltration is necessary to reduce the sodium content of the concentrate which is too high for its use as an animal feed. Unfortunately, the large volume of wastewater accumulating in the diafiltration process and the high cost of diafiltration are disadvantages.
The problem addressed by the present invention was to provide an alkaline cleaning formulation and a process for cleaning equipment used in the food industry of the type mentioned at the beginning which would enable cleaning to be carried out far more economically than in the prior art.
In the case of the water-containing alkaline cleaning formulation, the solution to this problem as provided by the invention is characterized in that the cleaning formulation contains only potash Iye or a mixture of potash Iye and another alkali, more particularly soda Iye, containing at least 20% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation, as its hydroxide component.
In the case of the cleaning process according to the invention, the solution to the problem stated above as provided by the invention is characterized in that it is carried out with a cleaning solution of which the hydroxide component consists solely of potash Iye or of a mixture of potash Iye and another alkali, more particularly soda Iye, containing at least 20% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning solution.
It has surprisingly been found that the partial or complete replacement of sodium hydroxide by potassium hydroxide increases the performance of the membrane unit by at least 10 to 50%. Performance in this case is based on the permeate flows achieved. Investment costs and the energy consumption of the membrane filtration unit can thus be reduced. Higher concentrations of the soil load removed are possible so that the volume of the soil load is reduced and the yield of regenerated solution is increased.
Another advantage was discovered. In contrast to the prior art where the concentrate obtained is a mass which is fairly solid at room temperature and which leads to problems during discharge from the buffer tank and during subsequent processing, the concentrate obtained where the cleaning formulation according to the invention is used and in the practical application of the process according to the invention is a mass containing the soils which is liquid at room temperature and even at a temperature of 0~C. On the one hand, this simplifies the waste logistics; on the other hand, greater concentration can be achieved, providing for a higher nutrient content where the concentrate is used as an animal feed and for a higher energy content where it is used as a fuel.
The advantages mentioned above were achieved with a minimum of only 20% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation. The disadvantage of the higher cost of using potash Iye instead of soda Iye is negligible because the potash Iye is largely regenerated.
In the nanofiltration of EDTA-containing cleaning solutions, the performance of the membrane filtration unit is likewise increased by replacement of the sodium salts by potassium salts. Disadvantages arising during filtration through the use of EDTA can thus be compensated or even overcompensated simply by using potash Iye and EDTA in the form of the free acid or its potassium salt. The disodium salt of EDTA may also be used providing this does not increase the sodium ion content of the formulation beyond certain limits. If all alkali metal ions are counted as alkali metal hydroxide, the potash Iye content of the cleaning formulation, based on the total amount of hydroxide present therein, should not fall below 20% by weight. Generally speaking, the performance of the filtration unit increases with the ratio of potassium to sodium ions in the cleaning formulation, i.e.
sodium-free cleaning solutions produce the highest throughflow rates in l/m2h.
The cleaning formulation preferably contains a mixture of potash Iye and another alkali, preferably soda Iye, containing at least 50% by weight of potash Iye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation.
The advantage of the EDTA-free cleaning formulation containing at least 50% by weight of potash Iye lies in the possibility of directly using the soils filtered off without any aftertreatment as an animal feed, for example as a pig feed, because a high potassium salt content can be tolerated more readily than a high sodium salt content.
In one particularly preferred embodiment, the EDTA-free cleaning formulation contains potash Iye alone as its hydroxide component. By virtue of its high content of potassium ions, the membrane filtration concentrate obtained in this case is a valuable animal feed supplement, particularly for pigfeed.
Where the soils removed are to be used as an animal feed, it is also of advantage for the cleaning formulation to contain additives which are all suitable as animal feed supplements. Special physiologically safe cleaning enhancers of the type in question, which are not used in known cleaning formulations, include in particular phosphates, gluconates and/or approved food-quality defoamers and emulsifiers.
In another advantageous embodiment, the cleaning formulation contains additives present in the form of potassium salts in addition to the hydroxide components. On the one hand, the performance of the membrane filtration unit can be additionally increased in this case. A permeate flow of, for example, 50 I/m2h in the case of a conventional cleaning formulation based on soda Iye can be increased to 70 I/m2h by replacing the soda Iye with potash Iye. If the cleaning formulation additionally contains potassium tripolyphosphate to enhance cleaning, the permeate flow additionally rises to 74 I/m2h.
Another advantage of these additives present in the form of potassium salts is their particular suitability as an animal feed supplement.
As mentioned above, the cleaning formulation according to the invention may be used with advantage for food-processing equipment having a regeneration unit for spent cleaning solutions. The cleaning formulation is particularly preferred for cleaning dairy equipment because the concentrate obtained may be used without any further aftertreatment as an animal feed.
There is generally no need for diafiltration or other additional working-up. Notonly is there no need for expensive waste-disposal of the soils separated off, these "soils" actually constitute a new useful material. If, however, the high salt content is to be reduced by diafiltration, the filtration process may be carried out much more quickly and hence economically in the case of the cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention.
The concentrates obtained in the nanofiltration of EDTA-containing cleaning solutions can be subjected to step-by-step acidification to recover the EDTA. If the concentrate is nonspecifically acidified (as described in Israeli patent application IS 109 249), almost all the dirt present in the concentrate is precipitated besides the EDTA. When the precipitated EDTA
filtered off is redissolved with a Iye, the dirt is also redissolved. If the resulting solution is added to the solution cleaned by nanofiltration, the degree of soiling prevailing before nanofiltration is virtually reestablished. By acidification in steps (fractional precipitation), most of the dirt can be precipitated before the precipitation point for EDTA. The precipitated dirt can then be removed by simple filtration. If the pH value of the filtered solution is further reduced, EDTA precipitates with a far lower content of residual soil.
The EDTA filtered off can be reconverted into a soluble form with alkali and added, for example, to the nanofiltration permeate. Since EDTA remains to a certain extent both in the precipitated sludge and in the solution from which it was precipitated, 80 to 90% of the EDTA originally used can be recycled by this method. However, the dirt filtered off can no longer be used as an animal feed on account of its residual EDTA content.
Alkali-resistant nanofiltration membranes with a D value of 100 to 2,000 dalton are preferably used in the process according to the invention to regenerate the cleaning solution. Membranes such as these are permeable to molecules with a molecularweight up to the D value mentioned, but retain molecules with a higher molecular weight.
In one particular embodiment, the membrane filtration is carried out on the crossflow principle with a transmembranal pressure difference of 8 to 25 bar.
In another preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, a cleaning solution containing only additives suitable as animal feedsupplements besides the hydroxide components is used for cleaning dairy equipment and the membrane filtration concentrate obtained is used as an animal feed or animal feed supplement.
A concentrate with a particularly high potassium content is far more suitable for use as an animal feed, for example as a pig feed, than concentrates with high sodium contents. In another embodiment, therefore, the hydroxide components of the cleaning solution consist solely of potash Iye.
The known cleaning process is described first in the following with reference to the accompanying drawing which is a simplified flow chart of a CIP cleaning system followed by a regeneration unit for the cleaning solution.
The description of the known process is followed by some Examples which demonstrate the superiority of the process and cleaning formulation according to the invention to the prior art.
From a collecting tank 1 for the cleaning solution with a volume of 5 to 30 m3, the solution which contains about 2% by weight of soda Iye in the prior art and 2% by weight of potash Iye according to the invention and which is heated to 60-70~C is fed to the equipment (tanks, pipelines, etc. denoted by the reference numeral 2 in Fig. 1) to be cleaned. The cleaning solution is circulated.
The soils gradually collecting in the cleaning solution are removed in the regenerating section shown on the right of Fig. 1. To this end, part of the cleaning solution is transferred to the buffer tank 4 through a pipe 3. This part of the cleaning solution is circulated through a membrane module 6 by a pressure pump 5. The soils collecting and settling in the buffer tank 4 are periodically removed through a pipe 7. The permeate issuing from the membrane module is returned to the collecting tank 1through the return pipe 8.
Example 1 (Comparison Example) An artificially soiled solution corresponding to practical conditions with a temperature of 60 to 65~C was used. It had been passed through a single-tube module with a membrane area of 0.042 m2 and an MPT 34 nanofiltration membrane (a product of Membrane Products) for 75 to 120 mins. at a throughput of 1000 I/h (entry pressure 18 bar, exit pressure 14 bar). The permeate side of the membrane was at atmospheric pressure.
In the case of a cleaning solution containing only 2% soda Iye, the permeate flow was 50 I/h m2.
Where a cleaning solution containing only 2% potash Iye was used, the permeate flow increased to 701/h m2.
When 0.1% by weight of gluconic acid was added to the cleaning solution containing the potash Iye, a permeate flow of 651/h m2 was observed.
When 0.25% by weight of potassium tripolyphosphate was added to the cleaning solution containing potash Iye, a permeate flow of 73 to 75 I/h m2 was observed.
These results reflect the clear superiority of the cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention over the prior art because far higher performances were achieved. An additional advantage lies in the low sodium content of the concentrate obtained so that the concentrate may readily be used without further aftertreatment as an animal feed. In particular,there is no need for expensive diafiltration which is necessary in the known process in order to reduce the sodium content to tolerable levels.
Example 2 An artificially soiled solution corresponding to practical conditions with a temperature of 60 to 65~C and an EDTA content of 0.7% by weight was used. It had been passed through a single-tube module with a membrane area of 0.042 m2 and an MPT 34 nanofiltration membrane (a product of Membrane Products) for 180 mins. at a throughput of 10001/h (entry pressure 18 bar, exit pressure 14 bar). The permeate side of the membrane was at atmospheric pressure.
In the case of a cleaning solution containing only 2% soda Iye, the .. ~ . .
permeate flow was 50 I/h m2.
When 0.7% by weight of EDTA was added to the cleaning solution containing the soda Iye, a permeate flow of only 30 I/h m2 was observed.
Where a cleaning solution containing only 2% potash Iye was used, the permeate flow increased to 70 I/h m2.
When 0.7% by weight of EDTA was added to the cleaning solution containing the potash Iye, a permeate flow of 60 I/h m2 was observed, i.e. a 20% improvement over the EDTA-free cleaning solution containing soda Iye.
These results reflect the clear superiority of the cleaning formulation and cleaning process according to the invention over the prior art because far higher performances were achieved and were not as badly affected by the addition of EDTA as the known cleaning formulations and cleaning processes.
Claims (17)
1. A water-containing alkaline cleaning formulation for equipment used in the food industry, characterized in that the cleaning formulation contains only potash lye or a mixture of potash lye and another alkali, more particularlysoda lye, containing at least 20% by weight of potash lye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation, as its hydroxide component.
2. A cleaning formulation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that it contains a mixture of potash lye and another alkali, preferably soda lye, containing at least 50% by weight of potash lye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation.
3. A cleaning formulation as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that it contains only potash lye as its hydroxide component.
4. A cleaning formulation as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that it contains additives which are all suitable as animal feed supplements.
5. A cleaning formulation as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that it contains phosphates, gluconates and/or approved food-quality defoamers and emulsifiers as additives.
6. A cleaning formulation as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that, besides the hydroxide components, it contains additives present in the form of potassium salts.
7. A cleaning formulation as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that, besides the hydroxide components, it contains ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA).
8. A cleaning formulation as claimed in the preceding claim, characterized in that the EDTA is used in the form of the free acid or a potassium salt.
9. A cleaning formulation as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the disodium salt of EDTA is used, in which case the potash lye content- if all the alkali metal ions are counted as hydroxides - amounts to at least 20% by weight, based on the total quantity of hydroxide present in the cleaning formulation.
10. The use of the cleaning formulation claimed in any of the preceding claims for food-processing equipment provided with a regeneration unit for spent cleaning solutions.
11. The use of the cleaning formulation according to the preceding claim for dairy equipment.
12. A process for cleaning equipment used in the food industry with an alkaline cleaning solution regenerated by membrane filtration, the permeate being recycled, characterized in that it is carried out with a cleaning solutionof which the hydroxide component consists solely of potash lye or of a mixture of potash lye and another alkali, more particularly soda lye, containing at least 20% by weight of potash lye, expressed as hydroxide and based on the total amount of hydroxide present in the cleaning solution.
13. A process as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that alkali-resistant nanofiltration membranes with a D value of 100 to 2,000 dalton are used to regenerate the cleaning solution.
14. A process as claimed in claim 9 or 10, characterized in that the membrane filtration is carried out on the crossflow principle with a transmembranal pressure difference of 8 to 25 bar.
15. A process as claimed in any of claims 9 to 11, characterized in that a cleaning solution containing only additives suitable as animal feed supplements besides the hydroxide components is used for cleaning dairy equipment and the membrane filtration concentrate obtained is used as an animal feed or animal feed supplement.
16. A process as claimed in the preceding claim, characterized in that the hydroxide components of the cleaning solution consist solely of potash lye.
17. A process as claimed in any of claims 12 to 16, characterized in that the EDTA in concentrates obtained in the nanofiltration of EDTA-containing cleaning solutions is recovered by fractional precipitation and filtration of most of the dirt before precipitation of the EDTA and, after dissolution with alkali hydroxide, is delivered to the nanofiltration permeate.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19607800.8 | 1996-03-01 | ||
DE19607800A DE19607800A1 (en) | 1996-03-01 | 1996-03-01 | Detergents for equipment in the food industry, its use and processes for cleaning these equipment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2248080A1 true CA2248080A1 (en) | 1997-09-04 |
Family
ID=7786862
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002248080A Abandoned CA2248080A1 (en) | 1996-03-01 | 1997-02-20 | A cleaning formulation for equipment used in the food industry, its use and a process for cleaning such equipment |
Country Status (14)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6204231B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP0883676B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2000506910A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE200792T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU714812B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9707898A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2248080A1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE19607800A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0883676T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2156360T3 (en) |
GR (1) | GR3035881T3 (en) |
NO (1) | NO983115L (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ331625A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997032000A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19726287A1 (en) * | 1997-06-20 | 1998-12-24 | Henkel Ecolab Gmbh & Co Ohg | Process for washing laundry, in particular workwear |
US7575687B2 (en) * | 2005-08-16 | 2009-08-18 | Ge Osmonics, Inc. | Membranes and methods useful for caustic applications |
US7909179B2 (en) * | 2005-08-16 | 2011-03-22 | Ge Osmonics, Inc. | Modified polyamide matrices and methods for their preparation |
US20100151094A1 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2010-06-17 | Choudhury Gour S | Methods, apparatuses, and systems for the removal of peels from agricultural produce |
ES2868145T3 (en) * | 2012-06-07 | 2021-10-21 | Diversey Inc | Compositions and methods of cleaning, disinfection and sanitation that are neutral in effluents |
US8835140B2 (en) | 2012-06-21 | 2014-09-16 | Ecolab Usa Inc. | Methods using peracids for controlling corn ethanol fermentation process infection and yield loss |
TR201812405T4 (en) | 2015-10-16 | 2018-09-21 | Georg Hagleitner Hans | Liquid detergent concentrate. |
GB201801230D0 (en) * | 2018-01-25 | 2018-03-14 | Univ Leuven Kath | Cross-linked nanofiltration membranes |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4243543A (en) * | 1979-05-11 | 1981-01-06 | Economics Laboratory, Inc. | Stabilized liquid enzyme-containing detergent compositions |
US4230592A (en) * | 1979-05-31 | 1980-10-28 | Chemed Corporation | Controlled foam detergent additive |
EG18543A (en) * | 1986-02-20 | 1993-07-30 | Albright & Wilson | Protected enzyme systems |
US5093031A (en) * | 1986-06-27 | 1992-03-03 | Isp Investments Inc. | Surface active lactams |
US4787999A (en) * | 1986-09-22 | 1988-11-29 | Dingess John A | Compositions for cleaning aluminum |
US4836948A (en) * | 1987-12-30 | 1989-06-06 | Lever Brothers Company | Viscoelastic gel detergent compositions |
US5273675A (en) * | 1990-02-16 | 1993-12-28 | Rohm And Haas Company | Phosphate-free liquid cleaning compositions containing polymer |
US5064561A (en) * | 1990-05-09 | 1991-11-12 | Diversey Corporation | Two-part clean-in-place system |
DE4206772A1 (en) * | 1992-03-04 | 1993-09-09 | Kramaschke Gmbh Dr | Compsn. for cleaning oil used in processing oil seeds and oil fruits - contg. high content of base esp. potassium hydroxide |
EP0551245B1 (en) | 1992-03-06 | 1996-09-11 | Filtrox-Werk AG | Process for the filtration of polluted lye and apparatus for implementing this process |
DE4319935A1 (en) * | 1993-06-16 | 1994-12-22 | Basf Ag | Use of glycine-N, N-diacetic acid derivatives as complexing agents for alkaline earth and heavy metal ions |
US5484549A (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 1996-01-16 | Ecolab Inc. | Potentiated aqueous ozone cleaning composition for removal of a contaminating soil from a surface |
US5514282A (en) * | 1994-04-01 | 1996-05-07 | Hibbard; David C. | Food processing wastewater treatment and recovery process |
IL109249A0 (en) | 1994-04-07 | 1994-07-31 | Weizmann Kiryat Membrane Prod | Process and system for purifying a contaminated caustic feed solution |
US5486315A (en) * | 1994-05-20 | 1996-01-23 | Lonza Inc. | Low foam branched alkyldimethylamine oxides |
US5746920A (en) * | 1994-06-08 | 1998-05-05 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Foerder Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. | Process for purifying dairy wastewater |
AU2064795A (en) * | 1994-06-09 | 1996-01-04 | Agricultural Research Institute Of Ontario | Process for clarifying milkhouse wastewater |
NO942341L (en) * | 1994-06-20 | 1995-12-21 | Arne Pedersen | Liquid, aqueous detergent |
ZA955295B (en) * | 1994-06-27 | 1996-02-13 | Diversey Corp | Non-silicated soft metal safe product |
US5520835A (en) * | 1994-08-31 | 1996-05-28 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Automatic dishwashing compositions comprising multiquaternary bleach activators |
DE19524211A1 (en) * | 1995-07-03 | 1997-01-09 | Henkel Ecolab Gmbh & Co Ohg | Plant cleaning process with integrated pre-rinse |
US5571446A (en) * | 1995-07-27 | 1996-11-05 | Diversey Corporation | Anionic stabilized enzyme based clean-in-place system |
CA2190235A1 (en) * | 1995-11-20 | 1997-05-21 | Barry Weinstein | High alkali-containing cleaning concentrates |
-
1996
- 1996-03-01 DE DE19607800A patent/DE19607800A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
1997
- 1997-02-20 AU AU17929/97A patent/AU714812B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-02-20 ES ES97903331T patent/ES2156360T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-02-20 JP JP9530558A patent/JP2000506910A/en active Pending
- 1997-02-20 AT AT97903331T patent/ATE200792T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-02-20 BR BR9707898A patent/BR9707898A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-02-20 DK DK97903331T patent/DK0883676T3/en active
- 1997-02-20 DE DE59703437T patent/DE59703437D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-02-20 CA CA002248080A patent/CA2248080A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-02-20 EP EP97903331A patent/EP0883676B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-02-20 US US09/142,098 patent/US6204231B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-02-20 WO PCT/EP1997/000799 patent/WO1997032000A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 1997-02-20 NZ NZ331625A patent/NZ331625A/en unknown
-
1998
- 1998-07-06 NO NO983115A patent/NO983115L/en unknown
-
2001
- 2001-05-16 GR GR20010400734T patent/GR3035881T3/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2156360T3 (en) | 2001-06-16 |
DK0883676T3 (en) | 2001-08-13 |
DE59703437D1 (en) | 2001-05-31 |
ATE200792T1 (en) | 2001-05-15 |
WO1997032000A3 (en) | 1997-12-11 |
EP0883676A2 (en) | 1998-12-16 |
JP2000506910A (en) | 2000-06-06 |
AU1792997A (en) | 1997-09-16 |
NO983115L (en) | 1998-07-06 |
WO1997032000A2 (en) | 1997-09-04 |
EP0883676B1 (en) | 2001-04-25 |
US6204231B1 (en) | 2001-03-20 |
GR3035881T3 (en) | 2001-08-31 |
DE19607800A1 (en) | 1997-09-04 |
AU714812B2 (en) | 2000-01-13 |
BR9707898A (en) | 1999-07-27 |
NZ331625A (en) | 1999-11-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5888311A (en) | Process for cleaning factory equipment with integrated prerinse | |
KR101329523B1 (en) | Ammonium/ammonia removal from a stream | |
CN101119930A (en) | Process to prepare salt | |
US6204231B1 (en) | Cleaning agent for food-industry facilities, its use and method of cleaning such facilities using the agent | |
CN108658345B (en) | Method and system for refining salt from high-salt wastewater | |
JPH1066972A (en) | Cleaning and regenerating method of separation membrane for water treatment | |
EP3004316A1 (en) | Aqueous solutions containing a complexing agent in high concentration | |
CN1036074C (en) | Prescription of composite detergent | |
WO1995027681A1 (en) | Process and system for purifying a contaminated caustic feed solution | |
US6331261B1 (en) | Water softener salt formulation | |
JP4850467B2 (en) | Cleaning method for membrane deaerator | |
JPS59112890A (en) | Desalination by reverse osmosis membrane device | |
CA2257450A1 (en) | Process for the partial desalination of water | |
US4540715A (en) | Surfactant and alkali metal citrate composition for recharging a water softener | |
US5151196A (en) | Method for regenerating scale solvent | |
CN104086011A (en) | Zero discharge process suitable for waste water of viscose fiber industrial acid station | |
US5352296A (en) | Process for cleaning metal surfaces | |
MXPA98006896A (en) | Cleaning formulation for the equipment that is used in the food industry, its use and a process to clean this equipment | |
EP1060135B1 (en) | Process for controlling scale in the sugar process | |
JPS6090816A (en) | Regeneration of alkali detergent containing alkali solution for washing vessel, particularly bottle | |
CN112607890B (en) | Zero-discharge water treatment process for high-salt-content water containing calcium and magnesium ions | |
CN1025114C (en) | Method for purifying kelp immersion water | |
RU2049074C1 (en) | Method of purifying waste water | |
EP0369831B1 (en) | Process for the chemical treatment of regeneration effluents of ion exchange resins from sugar decoloration solutions, and their regenerative use | |
EP1022254B1 (en) | Method and installation for the recycling of a residue of flue gas cleaning |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |